Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Ain Shams Engineering Journal

journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com

Civil Engineering

The level of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in

Malaysia
Idris Othman a, Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori a,⇑, Yani Rahmawati a, Y.H. Mugahed Amran b,c,
Mohammed Ali Mohammed Al-Bared a
a
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
b
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 11942 Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
c
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, Amran University, 9677 Quhal, Amran, Yemen

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Building Information Modelling is one of the crucial topics in the construction industry. The construction
Received 17 August 2019 industry has played an important role to assist stakeholders to successfully transfer construction prac-
Revised 25 January 2020 tices to BIM-based technology. Currently, no systematic research that has been carried out to determine
Accepted 13 April 2020
the level of BIM implementation in Malaysia. Therefore, this paper aims to evaluate the diffusion of BIM
Available online 11 June 2020
among Malaysian companies. The results of the 268 responses received revealed that only 13% of the par-
ticipants from both public and private sectors are using BIM in their organization and this is a negative
Keywords:
sign that Malaysia is still far away from the position it supposed to be in BIM implementation. Lack of
Building information modelling
BIM implementation
awareness, costs, slow adaptation, unavailability of a clear guideline to assist organizations and policy-
BIM awareness makers toward BIM implementation transforming and that BIM was not mandated in sufficient time
BIM usage were observed to be responsible for the slow implementation.
BIM benefits Ó 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.
Malaysia This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction been increasingly adopting it [3,4]. In reality, transformation was

seen as a challenging process because it transforms through four
BIM is a new approach introduced in construction projects to main stages; conventional stage (level 0). design-based modelling
manage building design and project data in digital form through- stage (level 1), collaboration-based modelling stage (level 2), and
out a building’s life cycle, an approach that provides the exchange integration-based modelling stage (level 3) which represent the
and interoperability of information among the stakeholders [1]. Its levels of BIM development [5]. The types of processes, tools, tech-
powerful benefits to reduce cost and time and increase productiv- niques, level of information, and collaboration to be used are cate-
ity and efficiency have driven construction players to adopt it and gorized for each stage. Nevertheless, Extent of organizations’
increasingly implement it in various domains [2]. Since 1970 s, performance or ability within a particular stage is measured to
transformation from traditional construction practices to BIM- determine BIM maturity level according to the BIM stages [6,7].
based design has become one of the most widely debated and writ- This paper has briefly highlighted the background of BIM, pre-
ten about topic on construction and therefore the AEC industry has sented the level of BIM implementation in the international con-
text and evaluated the level of BIM in the Malaysian construction
industry. It is aimed to establish the current level of BIM imple-
⇑ Corresponding author. mentation in Malaysia and identify its benefits to Malaysian con-
E-mail addresses: Yasser.alashmori@gmail.com, Yasser_16001693@utp.edu.my struction industry. Previous studies have discussed BIM benefits,
(Y.Y. Al-Ashmori). its challenges, and its technique effectiveness but no efforts have
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University. been undertaken to establish the level of BIM implementation
among local construction companies. This would provide a bench-
mark for the Malaysian construction industry to define a suitable
framework for construction players for successful transformation
Production and hosting by Elsevier through BIM stages.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.007
2090-4479/Ó 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
456 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463

2. Literature review Although, CIDB in Malaysia organizes a yearly program to pro-

mote BIM among construction practitioners to improve construc-
This section presents the background of BIM technology and tion practices, Malaysian construction industry is still controlled
illustrates the BIM implementation in the international and by traditional processes [24] which results in delay, cost overrun,
Malaysian context. Issues in construction and an understanding poor quality, low performance and low productivity, all of which
of their possible impact on construction performance will be elab- impact development and delay its international competitiveness.
orated. Authors have presented the significant progression that has According to Memon et al. [25], while BIM implementation in
been taken by Malaysian construction to improve construction Malaysia has met the requirements during the design phase, it is
performance related to BIM implementation. poor during the construction phase. The application of BIM in the
design stage is more in the modelling parts, while in the construc-
tion stage it is not implemented [25]. This fragmentation in the
2.1. Background of BIM implementation causes delay of BIM application and keeps the
industry at a low level of BIM implementation. There are many rea-
Building Information Modelling (BIM) is a process that trans- sons for this fragmented process such as the lack of understanding
forms construction process from fragmental traditional practices the process of BIM implementation, lack of skill in preparation of
to an integrated digital manner process. It is supported by various plans in BIM and the ability to effectively utilize it with stakehold-
tools, technologies and contracts to gather, generate, analyse, and ers, resistance to changing current ways of working, lack of collab-
manage the digital representation of the produced project model oration and coordination among various disciplines, limited
[8,9]. BIM is well known as n-D Modelling platform for effective availability of usage guidelines, etc. [23].
communication and collaboration and its application has extended
from 3D geometric model to include scheduling, costing, and facil-
ity management [10]. BIM implementation added valuable advan- 3. Methodology
tages to construction industry throughout the project life cycle. In
the design stage, BIM has proved its capability to enhance produc- The objectives of this research are to identify the level of BIM
tivity and efficiency [10–12]. In construction stage, BIM can incor- implementation in Malaysia, compare the finding to international
porate auto scheduling and cost analysis, and allows for enhanced implementation, and identify the important benefits of BIM imple-
coordination and quality of project delivery [3,13]. mentation. To achieve these objectives a questionnaire survey was
designed based on literature review. Then a semi structured inter-
view was conducted to validate the findings. Internet was the basis
2.2. BIM implementation in the international context of the literature review which was conducted to explore the BIM
technology implementation in the global context. Sources such as
Internationally, BIM implementation has achieved a significant journals, books, international conference and governmental
level in certain developed and developing countries. According to reports were used in this research. McGraw Hill Construction
the report from McGraw Hill Construction, BIM implementation 2014 reports on BIM [14] was adopted to evaluate BIM implemen-
is rapidly increasing in the international context [14]. In US, UK tation in the international context and used to identify variables
and other European countries, BIM is mandated. Singapore has for evaluating BIM level based on the awareness of BIM technology
reached 50% adoption and already required all projects to be sub- implementation process, BIM usage, and frequency of using BIM.
mitted via BIM e-submissions. In Native, BIM format since 2016 Therefore, in this research, the questionnaire was designed to
and the government has issued different guides and code of prac- explore the participant background, and their knowledge about
tices for BIM implementation [15,16]. Also, Australia has achieved BIM. Result of the questionnaire was validated by conducting semi
strong adoption whereby around 42% of Australian SMEs use BIM structured interview with two professionals on BIM in Malaysia.
in level 1 and level 2 and around 5% have tried level 3 [17]. So, This methodology developed a clear understanding of the level of
there is a high competition in construction industries in those BIM implementation and benefits influencing companies to con-
countries to adopt technology and transform construction prac- sider BIM in their projects.
tices from conventional process to BIM-based technology.

3.1. Data collection and sample size

2.3. BIM implementation in Malaysian construction industry
The questionnaire was developed based on awareness of
Construction industry in Malaysia plays an important role to respondent to BIM technology implementation process, BIM usage,
the Malaysian economy, contributing approximately 3 to 5 percent and frequency of using BIM. The questionnaire survey adopted in
of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) annually [18]. Therefore, this research was distributed during JELAJAH BIM, MyCREAST, &
Malaysian construction industry has taken very significant steps QLASSIC 2018 seminar which was held in Melaka on the 2nd of
to improve construction performance in the national level through August 2018, Kedah on the 29th of August 2018, Sabah on the
the introduction of BIM since 2007 [19,20]. Malaysian Public Work 20th of September 2018, and Sarawak on the 14th of November
Department (PWD) embraced BIM since then by targeting that BIM 2018. The seminar was open to Malaysian construction organiza-
should be implemented on 10% of public projects under Rancangan tions and was focused on promoting BIM and other construction
Malaysia ke-11 (RMK11) above RM 50 million. In addition, begin- technologies. This method of data collection was supported by
ning in 2018, BIM is mandate for any public project budgeted at the two professionals invited for semi-structured interview as a
RM100 million and above [21]. According to Datuk Seri Dr Roslan perfect strategy to involve companies interested in adopting BIM
Md Taha (PWD Director-General), a total of 18 projects have imple- as a new technology.
mented BIM in different phases in PWD up to 2017 as shown in The population of respondents were calculated based on the
Table 1. The purpose of BIM implementation in these projects dif- available online information under Real Estate & Housing Develop-
fered according to design authoring, visualization, design review, ers’ Association (REHDA) Malaysia for registered developers, the
coordination, documentation quantity, and/or record model [22]. Association of Consulting Engineers (ACE) for registered consultant
In 2015, construction industry launched a transformation program engineers, CIDB information system for registered contractors in
and BIM was promoted to improve productivity [23]. each state, and companies registered with CIDB MYBIM centre
 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463 457

Table 1
BIM Implementation Phases in PWD’S BIM Projects [22].

Project Concept. Prelim. Detailed Procurement Construction As- Project Concept. Prelim. Detailed Procurement Construction As-Build
design design design Build design design design
p p p p p p p
National Cancer Bagan Datuk
Institute Polythecnic
Putrajaya
p p p p
SMK Meru Raya Kemaman
Ipoh Perak Hospital
p p p p p p p p p
Health Clinic Istana Raja
Maran Pahang Muda Perlis Arau
p p p p p p p p
MACC Selangor Besut
Shah Alam Polythecnic
p p p
MARA College Pre-Approved
Banting Plan (PAP)
Selangor
p p p
MBKT Kuala Pendang Hospital
Terengganu
p p p p
Endocrine Pasir Gudang
Complex Hospital
Putrajaya
Hospital
p p p
UTHM Batu Kajang Hospital
Pahat Johor
p p p p
Parit Buntar Seri Iskandar
Hospital Hospital

for registered companies of BIM services. The population were esti- centre. The results collected previously from responses from Mel-
mated to be around 3533. By using Morgan’s table for determining aka state were published by the authors as a case study for BIM
sample size from a given population [26], the sample size repre- level in Melaka [28], and it is merged in this paper with other
senting the total population is determined to be 346. In this states to establish the level of BIM implementation in Malaysia.
research, 590 questionnaires surveys were distributed to the par- The pie chart shown in Fig. 1 illustrates the percentage of the
ticipants and 290 questionnaires were returned; out of the 290 respondent according to the states where the questionnaires were
retuned questionnaires, 268 were evaluated to be valid for further distributed. As shown, the highest number of responses were col-
analysis which covered the main objectives of this research. The lected during the seminar in Kedah (38%) followed by responses
percentage of the returned questionnaire is around 77%, which is from Sarawak, Melaka and Sabah with 31%, 17% and 14%, respec-
acceptable limit by Akadiri [27]. tively. Participants from construction industry were from public
and private sector and included developers, consultants, contrac-
tors, academician, administrations, and others. It was observed
3.2. Respondents demographic analysis that the number of registered participants in the seminar were
around 200 in Kedah and Sarawak, while in Melaka and Sabah
Participants involved in this research were targeted to be from the overall registered participants were about 100. Therefore, over-
public and private sectors which include client/developers, all respondents are applicable to represent the level of BIM imple-
contractors, consultants, and participants from CIDB and MYBIM mentation in Malaysia. Professionals in the interview were asked
about the percentage of respondent and they both agreed that this
can perfectly reflect the level of BIM application in Malaysia.
For the interview, as highlighted two expert professionals were
invited to explore their feedback about the finding and discuss the
level of BIM implementation in details. The background of the
interviewees are as follow:

- Interviewee I: Director in a consultant company, he has a mas-

ter qualification and has been working for eight years. Seven
years of his experience involved BIM projects. He is extremely
aware of BIM implementation.
- Interviewee II: Head engineer for data management represent-
ing clients and developers, he has a Master of Business Admin-
istration and degree of mechanical engineering and he has been
working for 23 years. Two years of his experience involved BIM
projects. He is extremely aware of BIM implementation.

In this research, the authors have classified the respondents

according to their qualification, years of experience, and position
as shown in Table 2. The qualification of respondents was mea-
sured to be 46%, 24%, and 14% for bachelor’s degree, diploma,
and high school, respectively. The percentage of respondents hold-
Fig. 1. Percentage of Data Collection. ing a master’s degree was 10% and only 1% had completed PhD. The
458 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463

Table 2
Classification of Respondents (Demographic Analysis).

Melaka Kedah Sabah Sarawak total

Education Qualification High-school 0.4% 4.9% 4% 4.5% 14%
Diploma 3.7% 11.6% 2% 6.0% 24%
Bachelor degree 8.6% 17.2% 4% 15.7% 45%
Master degree 4.5% 2.6% 0% 2.2% 10%
PhD 0.0% 0.4% 0% 0.7% 1%
Others 0.0% 1.5% 2% 1.9% 5%
Years of Experiece Less than 5 years 5.6% 13.4% 4.5% 9.3% 33%
5 to 10 years 5.2% 9.7% 4.9% 7.1% 27%
10 to 15 years 1.9% 7.1% 1.1% 5.2% 15%
More than 15 years 4.5% 8.2% 3.0% 9.3% 25%
Designation Executive 3.0% 10.1% 1.9% 10.1% 25%
Senior Management 3.7% 9.7% 1.1% 6.7% 21%
Junior Management 3.0% 7.5% 1.9% 3.7% 16%
others 7.5% 11.2% 8.6% 10.4% 38%

figure also shows that around 33% of the respondents have worked
from one to less than 5 year, which is the highest percentage
among other working experience groups. Respondents with a
working experience between 5 and 10 years and more than
15 years were about 27% and 25%, respectively, and only 15% of
the respondents have worked from 10 to15 years, which is the
lowest. In terms of the respondent designation, it can be observed
that 25% of the respondents are executive management, 21% are
junior management, 16% are the senior management and 38% are
others that included engineers, lecturers, QS and admin, which
was the highest percentage among the respondents. The propor-
tion of respondents according to the state of the data collection
is illustrated in the table. According to the interview discussion
about the classification of respondents, both interviewed profes-
sionals believe that the designation could be anything related to
civil or construction project (engineering, management, or a lec-
turer at civil engineering department) as long as the respondent
has knowledge of construction projects and BIM. In terms of qual-
ification, they mentioned that the majority of industry players will
have a bachelor’s degree which was exactly similar to the ques-
tionnaire result. However, they highlighted that the qualification
level was not supposed to affect the quality of the response.
In terms of company establishment, this study classified
Fig. 2. Classification of Respondents’ Sector.
respondents as either public or private. Fig. 2 shows the percentage
of public sector to private sector. It is clearly shown that majority
of the respondents are from the private sector (68%), which was
approximately twice as high than the participants from the public
sector (32%). There is no exact explanation for variation, but the
authors found that Malaysian construction has mandated BIM to
any public project budgeted at RM100 million and above [21]. This
was seen as an acceptable reason to have more respondents from
private sectors seeking to enhance their awareness and under-
standing of this new technology and its application in construction
projects because CIDB has recommended the mandatory use of
Building Information Modelling (BIM) in certain private sector pro-
jects by 2020 [29].
In terms of the Nature of Business, this paper has a diverse
range of respondents from Clients/developers, contractors, civil
and structure engineers, architectures, and Mechanical, Electrical
and Piping engineers (MEP). Fig. 3 illustrated the percentage of
participants from each business according to their related sector.
Total of 45% and 15% from all states represent contractors and cli-
ents, respectively, which is the highest compared to others. In pub-
lic sector, contractors represent 9% and clients was 6%. About only
1% of the total respondent from MEP and architectural engineer in
both sectors. Civil and structural engineers recorded 6% and 3%
Fig. 3. Respondent Nature of Business.
from public sector and private sector respectively. The proportion
 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463 459

of respondents according to the states are clearly illustrated in the

figure.
Since the data of this research were conducted through one of
the promoting programs organized by CIDB to enhance BIM appli-
cation in construction projects, the diversity of participants in such
activities provide a positive sign of future collaboration and readi-
ness of these organizations to adopt BIM-based technology. In
other words, the availability of different organizations, from differ-
ent background, interested in BIM technology shows that there is
initiation and positive motivation to make changes to use a new
technology such as BIM. In the next section, the authors had dis-
cussed the involvement of those companies with BIM application
and the findings of data collected.

4. Results and discussion

Fig. 5. Period of BIM Implementation to Company Establishment.
In this section, the questionnaire results are analysed based on
the research objectives. The result of the level of BIM implementa-
tion and the level of awareness will be elaborated. The results of
the descriptive analysis are then compared to other countries to
have a good indication of the Malaysian level of BIM
implementation.

4.1. BIM implementation in Malaysian construction industry

BIM implementation is always predicted by the readiness of

organization to adopt the technology and apply it in the business
environment. The bar chart in Fig. 4 represents the percentage of
organization that have adopted the implementation of BIM in their
construction projects, and it is clear that in both private and public
sectors, the number of organizations implementing BIM is very
low. This clearly indicates that BIM has not been adopted by those
organizations. The result revealed that only 8.2% from the public
sector are using BIM technology and only 4.9% from the private
sector. Most of the investigated companies reported that they are Fig. 6. Period of Malaysian BIM Implementation Compared to Global Level of BIM
not using BIM due to various reasons such as poor knowledge, cost, Implementation.
lack of awareness, and/or difficulties to shift from traditional prac-
tices. It is clear that this has been an issue since 2013, as previous
reports have also shown that the level of BIM adoption and imple-
mentation is very low due to the similar above mentioned chal- depicts the period of BIM implementation among organizations.
lenges [18,25,30,31]. It is clearly seen that around 10.8% The highest value was observed in the 0-year users in both private
participants from both public and private sectors have no idea and public (56% and 16% respectively). Government supports the
whether their companies are using BIM or not, which could explain application of BIM and the construction industry required BIM as
the lack of knowledge about the technology. part of the agreement in government projects, therefore the appli-
McGraw Hill Construction evaluated the period of using BIM by cation of BIM in the public sectors is relatively higher than the pri-
categorizing the time length to 1–2 year, 3–5 years, 6–10 years, vate sector. On the other hand, private sector faced challenges such
and more than 11 years [14]. This research adopted similar time as business process changes, cost of technology, and professional
frame including 0 years for non-BIM users’ companies. Fig. 5 skills. Similar percentage in both sectors were recorded for compa-
nies using BIM for 1–2 years and 2–10 years, while only 11.1% of
public sector has used BIM more than 11 years.
The length of time that BIM has been utilized in Malaysia com-
panies is far behind the global level adopted from McGraw Hill
Construction report [14]. Fig. 6 compares the period of BIM tech-
nology application in different region and countries reported by
McGraw Hill Construction to result obtain by this research.
Adaptation and familiarity of the Practical BIM application will
have a significant impact to improve professional’s knowledge of
BIM implementation. In Malaysia, it is found that most construc-
tion organizations have not yet adopted the implementation of
BIM. As a result, professionals within the organization environ-
ment will not be able to experience and interact with the technol-
ogy and this would have a significant impact to improve the
technical and management skills of the construction team. Fig. 7
illustrates the frequency that respondents use BIM application.
The levels were designated as never, rarely, sometimes, often,
Fig. 4. Number of Participants Representing Organizations Using BIM in Malaysia. and always. Based on the responses, around 78% of the overall par-
460 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463

Fig. 8. Awareness of BIM Implementation Process.

management decision toward the transformation to BIM-based

technology. BIM implementation is a challenging task and
involves multiple information from different parties, but aware-
Fig. 7. Frequency of Time Professionals Interfere With the BIM. ness of the processing would help to overcome the implementa-
tion challenges. This study has evaluated participants’
ticipant had never used BIM in his/her work and 10% has used it on awareness of BIM process implementation as illustrated in
Fig. 8. The result revealed that majority of the respondents are
a rare basis. Assuming that sometimes is the good level of using
BIM that can help build skills and develop technical competency, not aware of the BIM process. Although, private sector score
higher record than public sector, this does not indicate that pri-
the total responses for those who use BIM in sometimes, often,
vate sector is more aware than the public sector. The difference
and always basis were measured to be only 12%. Those rates give
in this proportion could be due to the difference in the partici-
a drawback indicator of the BIM implementation in Malaysian con-
pants from each sector. The proportion of professionals in both
struction industry. Practical application of the technology is very
sectors that scored a good understanding of the technology appli-
essential to overcome implementation challenges and understand
cation and process (in this study is moderate aware and above) is
when, where and how to use the technology. Therefore, it is recom-
still lower than it is supposed to be. Overall level of awareness
mended that construction companies to initiate the adaptation of
was 55% from all respondents.
BIM and encourage their team to maintain its implementation.
During the seminars, participants discussed the BIM project
This will make it easier for companies to involve BIM in their work
execution and how its information would be transferred through
environment.
different organization or parties in the same project. Participants
However, this finding shows that the level of BIM implementa-
had serious doubts about the model ownership and privacy of
tion is still very low and construction industry needs more effort to
information. They were not clear of the BIM execution procedure.
enhance the practitioners’ orientation to BIM-based technology.
Organizations tended to improve their involvements with BIM
This study has explained the interviewees’ perception on the level
and other technologies in Malaysia by attending CIDB related pro-
of BIM implementation to support and validate the above decision
grams. Many participants have argued that the Malaysian govern-
of BIM implementation level. Interviewee 1 comments that Malay-
ment should provide a comprehensive guide to understand BIM
sia is not implementing BIM and he evaluated it at level 0 ‘‘conven-
execution plan and how different organizations can manage BIM
tional level” because BIM project in Malaysia did not reduce cost,
time, and the productivity is still low. Interviewee 2 believed that projects. Besides, BIM implementation should be mandated in both
public and private sector.
the implementation of BIM is not fully addressed and what Malay-
sia is practicing is just modelling which put it in level 1 modelling A one-way between-groups analysis of variance was conducted
to explore the impact of the technology adoption in the organiza-
stage. Both interviewees agreed that the implementation of BIM
concept as the management and collaboration platform was not tions of the level of professionals’ awareness, as measured by the
usage of BIM in the company as shown in Table 3. Participant’s
adopted and practiced. Interviewee 2 insisted that the BIM project
should fully utilize the concept of BIM through the construction awareness was divided into three groups according to the usage
of BIM (Group 1: Yes; Group 2: No; Group 3: Maybe). There was
process which include the design stage, project execution, commis-
sioning and operation. Therefore, it is recommended that the orga- a statistically significant difference at the p < .001 level in usage
of BIM scores for the five groups: F (2, 17.78) = 15.54, p = .000.
nizations should commit to BIM adoption and start practicing BIM
processes within their projects, collaborate with each other to suc- Despite reaching statistical significance, the actual difference in
mean scores between the groups was quite small. The effect of size,
cessfully manage BIM project. Willingness and commitment
toward BIM technology is essential to make successful enhance- calculated using eta squared, was 0.02. Post-hoc comparisons using
the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for Group 1
ment of BIM implementation. Every sector in the construction
industry should be responsible to work together to improve con- (M = 3.4, SD = 1.22) was significantly different from Group 3
(M = 2.27, SD = 1.13). Group 2 (M = 2.34, SD = 1.05) did not differ
struction performance and achieve international competitiveness.
significantly from either Group 1 or 3. This finding explains the sig-
nificant impact of the usage of BIM within a company to the level
4.2. Awareness of BIM implementation of awareness of its team. As recommended above, organizations
are advised to take the responsibility to adopt BIM processes and
The awareness of BIM implementation and its processing in shift gradually to meet the construction industry transformation
construction projects has a significant impact to enhance top program.
 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463 461

Table 3
One-Way ANOVA Test.

Descriptive
Awareness
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Yes 35 3.40 1.22 0.21 2.98 3.82 1.00 5.00
No 204 2.34 1.05 0.07 2.20 2.49 1.00 5.00
Maybe 29 2.20 1.01 0.19 1.82 2.59 1.00 4.00
Total 268 2.46 1.13 0.07 2.33 2.60 1.00 5.00

Based on the interview discussion, interviewee I agreed that BIM improves con-
ANOVA Test struction productivity and efficiency, reduces cost and time, enhances construction
environment in terms of safety and management. He explained that BIM applica-
Awareness tion is expanded, and the technology is in a continuous development to involve
all construction domains. For example, BIM was known as a 3-D modelling and
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
improved to include time and cost as 4 and 5-D, further development includes
Squares Square the 6-D of facility management. He also mentioned that BIM benefits will be
achieved if everyone is willing and committed to BIM, all parties should take
Between Groups 35.56 2 17.78 15.54 0.00
responsibility for implementation, and project stakeholders must collaborate effec-
Within Groups 303.14 265 1.14 tively. Interviewee II had a different opinion and argued that we know the benefits
Total 338.70 267 from books and journals. In terms of the construction practices improvement, he
has agreed that BIM visualize the project and include component specification
and details and even supplier information. He agreed that BIM could save a lot of
maintenance costs during operation stage but limited proof or real case study to
4.3. BIM benefits motivate companies to use BIM
claim BIM could save cost and time during other stages. To convince practitioners
of BIM benefits, the construction industry should provide evidence to player on
The benefits of BIM have driven construction industry to introduce BIM in
how this technology will benefit them or it must mandate its implementation.
construction projects. The construction industry main goal of adopting BIM is to
increase productivity and efficiency. Of course, literatures have listed a variety of
benefits that have led to significant improvement in construction sustainability.
Those benefits influence construction practitioners’ decision to adopt BIM. This 5. Conclusion
research has identified 18 factors as positive influence factors (IF) that strongly rep-
resent the most discussed benefits achieved by implementing BIM in construction
practices. Across all participants, the top 7 ranked factors -with the highest mean
The primary contribution of this research paper is to establish
of 4 and above- are increase productivity and efficiency, assess time and cost, elim- the current level of BIM implementation in Malaysian construction
inate clashes in design, integrate scheduling and planning, identify time-based industry. The construction industry works hard with CIDB to pro-
clashes, improve multi-party communication and monitor and track progress dur- mote BIM implementation to enhance professionals and organisa-
ing construction. These factors mostly concern professionals for adopting BIM.
tions’ awareness and encourage them to adopt BIM process and
Other factors are also significant and considered valuable to construction industry.
Table 4 shows the list of 18 factors used in this research with their mean score and implement it in their work environment. This research targeted
standard deviation. The result shows a mean between 4.08 and 3.85 and standard local construction organization participated in BIM promoting
deviation between 0.85 and 0.73, indicating a high agreement of the respondent’s seminars organized by CIDB. Questionnaire survey was distributed
perception with significant deviation. The test for consistency were excellent in Melaka, Kedah Sabah, and Sarawak. This study concluded that
according to Cronbach’s Alpha 0.98. According to Bui, Merschbrock and Munkvold
[2], BIM is seen as a catalyst innovation in the construction industry. Therefore,
adoption and usage of BIM technology concept within the organi-
organizations should understand the effective process for implementing BIM in zation has a significant impact to professionals and management
the projects. skills. The level of BIM implementation and team awareness

Table 4
Non-Exhaustive List of Benefits Influences BIM Implementation.

ID Factors Mean Std. a Ranking The important benefits identified were also supported by
Deviation the below listed researchers
IF1 Increase productivity and efficiency design. 4.08 0.77 0.98 1 [10,12,32]
IF2 Assess time and cost associated with design change. 4.07 0.82 2 [12,31,32]
IF3 Eliminate clashes in design. 4.06 0.78 3 [12,14,31,32]
IF4 Integrate construction scheduling & planning. 4.04 0.76 4 [3]
IF5 Identify time-based clashes. 4.03 0.80 5 [3,14]
IF6 Improve multi-party communication and maintain 4.03 0.77 6 [3]
synchronize communication.
IF7 Monitor and track progress during construction. 4.01 0.80 7 [12]
IF8 Effectively collaborate with other teams to successfully 3.99 0.79 8 [12,32]
deliver a product.
IF9 Integrate cost estimation. 3.99 0.80 9 [3,14]
IF10 Facilitate site analysis and planning. 3.98 0.77 10 [3]
IF11 Review design progress. 3.97 0.77 11 [3]
IF12 Increase sustainable goals. 3.91 0.79 12 [3]
IF13 Maintain success interoperability of building component 3.91 0.73 13 [3]
throughout the building lifecycle.
IF14 Enhance collaboration between stakeholders. 3.90 0.81 14 [3,12,14,32]
IF15 Promote transparency. 3.88 0.84 15 [3]
IF16 Support safety management processes. 3.87 0.85 16 [14]
IF17 Allow diversity Management. 3.86 0.79 17 [3,10]
IF18 Facilitate energy efficiency analysis. 3.85 0.81 18 [3]
462 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463

increased when the organization practices BIM in its daily works [8] CIDB, ‘‘Promotion of BIM in Malaysia,” Construction Industry Development
Board Malaysia, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cidb.gov.my/index.php/
and training or promoting seminars will be passive if it is not
en/focus-areas/teknologi-dan-inovasi?id=704.
applied. Willingness and commitment always lead to effective [9] C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, A Guide to Building Information
involvement in adaptation and encourages team work to enhance Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. 2011.
the BIM implementation awareness. In this study, the opinions of [10] Azhar S, Khalfan M, Maqsood T. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Now
and Beyond. Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 2012;12(4):15–28.
expert personal on BIM implementation and its benefits was dis- [11] Bentley, ‘‘How AIA partner Bentley’s BIM applications designed the world-
cussed and recommendations were given accordingly. class architecture of One Blackfriars,” 2017.
The most significant finding of this study is that BIM implemen- [12] Migilinskas D, Popov V, Juocevicius V, Ustinovichius L. The benefits, obstacles
and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia Eng.
tation in Malaysia in both private and public construction sectors 2013;57:767–74.
are still in a very low level. Majority of the surveyed organizations [13] Branz, ‘‘Productivity Benefits of BIM,” 2013.
are not using BIM and the team are not practicing its concept. This [14] McGraw Hill Construction, The business value of BIM for construction in major
global markets. 2014.
results in a delay of the diffusion of BIM implementation. The con- [15] Corenet, ‘‘Building Information Modeling (BIM) e-Submission,” Singapore
struction players have difficulties to understand how BIM could be Government, Corenet e-Information System, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://
executed among parties. The study shows that BIM has been www.corenet.gov.sg/general/building-information-modeling-(bim)-e-
submission.aspx.
implemented in a fragmented environment to produce models [16] BCA - Building and Construction Authority, ‘‘Code of Practice for Building
whereas BIM implementation in whole BIM project management Information Modelling (BIM) e - Submission,” CORENET e-Information Syst.,
is inefficient. Therefore, in this study, it is recommended that 2016.
[17] Hosseini MR et al. BIM adoption within Australian Small and Medium-sized
intensive workshops to promote BIM should illustrate the process
Enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model. Constr. Econ. Build.
of the BIM implementation rather than only promoting the advan- 2016;16(3):71.
tages and the implementation benefits. A case study to show the [18] Z. Zahrizan, Nasly, M. Ali, T. Haron, A. Marshall-ponting, and A. H. Zuhairi,
whole system process and its usefulness to improve work environ- ‘‘Exploring the Barriers and Driving Factors in Implementing Building
Information Modelling (BIM) in the Malaysian Construction Industry : A
ment is essential to build concrete confidence for adoption. As a Preliminary Study,” vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.
matter of fact, professionals are facing difficulties to practice the [19] Latiffi AA, Mohd S, Kasim N, Fathi MS. Building Information Modeling (BIM)
technology and improve technical and implementation skill. This application in Malaysian construction industry. Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manag.
2013;2:1–6.
research recommended organizations to initiate the adoption of [20] Latiffi AA, Mohd S, Brahim J. Application of Building Information Modeling
BIM and encourage professionals to develop their skills on the (BIM) in the Malaysian Construction Industry: A Story of the First Government
BIM implementation. Attending training or seminars will enhance Project. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015;773–774(MARCH):943–8.
[21] PWD and CIDB, ‘‘BIM Execution Plan,” 2018.
the theoretical knowledge of participant, while practicing the tech- [22] CIDB, ‘‘Jelajah BIM, MyCREAST, & QLASSIC 2018,” MYBIM Center, 2018.
nology will increase skills and knowledge. [Online]. Available: https://www.mybimcentre.com.my/jelajah2018/.
This study inevitably has a few limitations. In this study, four [23] CIDB, ‘‘Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) 2016-2020,”
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia, 2016.
states were the survey questionnaire were distributed, while states [24] S. Rahim, F. A. A. Nifa, and M. N. M. Nawi, ‘‘Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in
such as Selangor, Kuala Lumpur, and Johor that have a high level of Malaysian Construction Industry Dealing With Waste Issue,” no. January,
construction developments were not targeted. It is worth to have a 2015.
[25] Memon AH, Rahman IA, Memon I, Azman NIA. BIM in Malaysian construction
future research to evaluate the level of BIM implementation in
industry: Status, advantages, barriers and strategies to enhance the
those states and determine if the level of construction has any implementation level. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014;8(5):606–14.
impact on it. It is also important to highlight that this finding only [26] Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol.
represents the level of BIM implementation in the last quarter of Meas. 1970;30(4):607–10.
[27] O. P. Akadiri, ‘‘Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of
the year 2018 at the time when the data were collected. As a future sustainable materials for building projects,” 2011.
work of this study, the authors are going to deeply study the BIM [28] Y. Y. Al-ashmori, I. Bin Othman, H. Bin Mohamad, Y. Rahmawati, and M.
implementation benefits and investigate the relationship between Napiah, ‘‘Establishing the Level of BIM implementation – A Case Study in
Melaka , Malaysia,” 2019.
BIM benefits and organization decision on BIM implementation [29] Bernama, ‘‘CIDB recommends mandatory use of BIM in certain private sector
which will highlight the important factors of BIM implementation projects,” New Straits Times, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nst.com.
that could drive player to achieve BIM benefits [33]. my/news/nation/2019/03/470468/cidb-recommends-mandatory-use-bim-
certain-private-sector-projects.
[30] B. Zakaria et al., ‘‘Exploring the adoption of Building Information Modelling
(BIM) in the Malaysian construction industry : A qualitative approach.,” 2013.
Acknowledgment [31] A. H. Memon, I. A. Rahman, and I. Memon, ‘‘BIM in Malaysian Construction
Industry : Status , Advantages , Barriers and Strategies to Enhance the ...,” no.
The authors would like to express their utmost gratitude to August, 2014.
[32] A. Tarmizi et al., ‘‘An Industrial Report on The Malaysian Building Information
FRGS grant Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for supporting Modelling (BIM) Taskforce: Issues and Recommendations,” vol. 17, 2015.
this research. [33] Y. Y. Al-Ashmori, I. Othman, Y. Rahmawati et al., BIM benefits and its influence
on the BIM implementation in Malaysia, Ain Shams Engineering Journal,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.002.
References
Dr. Ir. Idris Othman, [ASEAN Chartered Professional Engineer (ACPE-02579/MY),
[1] Ilhan B, Yaman H. Meta-Analysis of Building Information Modeling Literature PJK, P.Eng (BEM PEC113073), TOTAL-FRANCE Cert (Oil & Gas), PhD(UTP), MSc(USM),
in Construction. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 2013;3(4):373–9. BEng(UiTM), DEng (UTM), MIEM(M13558), MCSM(M0510), MyGEOPOLYMER, MQA,
[2] Bui N, Merschbrock C, Munkvold BE. A Review of Building Information EAC(Washington Accord,USA), ETAC(Sydney Accord,Aust), ETeAC (Dublin Accord,
Modelling for Construction in Developing Countries. Procedia Eng. 2016;164 UK].
(1877):487–94.
[3] A. Gha et al., ‘‘Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake : Clear bene fi ts , Yasser is a PhD student at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS since August 2017. He
understanding its implementation , risks and challenges,” vol. 75, no. October
has around 5 years working experiences including the area of oil & gas, stormwater
2015, pp. 1046–1053, 2017.
management, quantity surveying, construction management. He took his degree in
[4] He Q, Wang G, Luo L, Shi Q, Xie J, Meng X. Mapping the managerial areas of
Civil engineering and Master in Construction Management from Universiti Tekno-
Building Information Modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. Int. J. Proj.
Manag. 2017;35(4):670–85. logi Malaysia on 2012 and 2016 respectively. He is interested on BIM implemen-
[5] Succar B. Building information modelling framework : A research and delivery tation and its application on construction projects.
foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 2009;18(3):357–75.
[6] Succar B et al. The Five Components of BIM Performance Measurement. Build. Dr. Yani is currently Senior Lecturer in Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. She
Des. 2014;19(September):287–300. obtained her Degree in Architecture Engineering as well as Master and Doctoral in
[7] K. Barlish and K. Sullivan, ‘‘How to measure the bene fi ts of BIM — A case study Construction Project Management from Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. She
approach,” vol. 24, pp. 149–159, 2012.
 I. Othman et al. / Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12 (2021) 455–463 463

is specialized on Sustainable project development and construction, Building Malaysia (UTM) in 2015, and currently he is pursuing his Ph.D in soft soil stabi-
Information Modelling, and Collaborative Decision Making. She is also active lization using sustainable materials in Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP),
member in Project Management Institute. Malaysia.

Y. H. Mugahed Amran is an assistant professor of structural engineering at the He has 24 research papers published in prestigious journals and international
department of civil engineering, college of engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz indexed conferences. He was the corresponding author of two papers recently
University (PSAU), Saudi Arabia and former assistant professor at Amran University, published in Acta Geotechnica and the Journal of International Measurement
Yemen. He received his B.Eng in civil engineering and M.Eng in structure from Confederation. He also published papers in Geomechanics and Engineering, an
Universiti Tecknologi Malaysia (UTM) and PhD in structural Engineering from International Journal, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Geotechnical and Geolog-
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) in 2011, 2013 and 2016. respectively. His research ical Engineering Journal and Malaysian Construction Research Journal. He is
interests are structural engineering, concrete structures, supplemental cementi- working in soft soil improvement techniques and dynamic and static loading effect
tious materials (SCM), fibrous and porous composites, and smart materials & on soft soils.
structures.

Mohammed Ali Mohammed Al-Bared was born in Dhamar, Yemen in 1989. He

received his Bachelor of Civil Eng. from Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur
(IUKL) in 2013, Master of geotechnical engineering from Universiti Teknologi