Natural Ventilation in Nursing Facility
Natural Ventilation in Nursing Facility
Natural Ventilation in Nursing Facility
© Copyright 2007
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. It is pre-
sented for educational purposes only. This article may not be copied and/or distributed elec-
tronically or in paper form without permission of ASHRAE.
Natural Ventilation
In Nursing Facility
By Matthew Younger, P.E., Associate Member ASHRAE • Build a facility that attracts and
retains staff.
T
he Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs’ mis- Once the entire design team was as-
sembled as part of the predesign phase,
sion is, “Serving Those Who Served.” In keeping with this all members participated in a charette
that focused on sustainability. The simple
mission, planning began in 1998 with the department and NBBJ concepts of connections from the indoors
to outdoors, access to fresh air, views,
Architects for a new skilled nursing facility. The Veterans Affairs daylighting, and passive/unobtrusive
systems would contribute to each of the
existing campus located in Retsil, Wash., required an additional project goals. To summarize, sustainable
design was not the objective. However, it
259-bed facility to serve its assisted living needs. The project enabled the design to achieve the goals.
One key goal that emerged was to
goals included the following components: naturally ventilate as much of the proj-
• Provide the best possible living envi- • Balance a respect for privacy with the
ronment for the residents; need for socialization; About the Author
• Create a state-of-the-art facility; • Design outdoor spaces that enhance the Matthew Younger is a principal at Stantec Con-
• Construct a non-institutional facility quality of life for residents and staff; sulting in Seattle. The project’s design won a first
that fosters aging in place; and place 2007 ASHRAE Technology Award.
single-sided natural ventilation. In general, the residents are ex- cross-ventilation. The concrete structure is used in these areas
pected to operate their living spaces in the same manner as any as well. High and low windows facilitate natural convection
homeowner. These windows were also selected to provide more currents of warm air rising to flow out of the high windows with
accessibility to daylight. The main building spine is oriented cool fresh air entering at the height of the occupants.
from east to west, with shading devices in the form of overhangs
and fins to control solar heat gain from the south. The nursing Mechanical System Features
wings have occupant-controlled, motorized, exterior venetian Minimum ventilation air-handling units. These AHUs
blinds to control solar gain on the north and south sides. supply minimum ventilation air to each building wing. In heat-
Cost transfer was a key to implementing many of these fea- ing mode, the rooftop units temper the ventilation air through
tures. Based on the need for thermal mass to enable passive hydronic heating coils. In summer mode, these units continue
cooling strategies, a detailed analysis of a steel structure and to provide 100% outside air (without added cooling energy)
a precast concrete structure showed that a $400,000 premium when activated by CO2 sensors. For the remainder of the time,
was required to obtain the necessary thermal mass within the the spaces operate in natural ventilation mode. Heat recovery
building structure. However, the cost transfer to offset this (captured from the residence restroom exhaust) is used to pre-
premium was easily demonstrated by comparing the cost of heat this ventilation air.
the $800,000 premium for a fully air-conditioned building to Steam heat exchanger. The campus had an existing district
a naturally cooled facility with ducted minimal ventilation. steam heating system. The hydronic heating water from the heat
The project used a general contractor/construction manage- exchangers supplies hot water to all heating components.
ment approach, enabling the design team to source accurate Baseboard heaters. To allow for increased user control and
construction cost data for determining the effectiveness of cost ultimately a higher degree of individual comfort, each occupied
transfer concepts. space was designed with adjustable baseboard heaters. These
At the department of health’s request, rough-ins for split units are controlled in each space by the occupant and are de-
system air-conditioning units were added in common areas signed to compensate for skin heat loss as well as to provide
throughout the building (to address a handful of marginally heating of ventilation air through operable windows.
acceptable spaces), however, these were not purchased or in- This building section illustration (Figure 1) shows the major
stalled. Acceptable comfort conditions have been demonstrated components of the air-side heating and cooling concepts. High
during the past two years using passive cooling techniques only, and low level operable windows allow for increased air circu-
and supplemental mechanical comfort cooling in the common lation and passive cooling. To control solar heat gain, motor
areas is not required. controlled exterior blinds were installed.
Within resident rooms, high ceilings, concrete mass and
high and low operable windows combine to create a radiant Energy Efficiency
cooling effect in conjunction with natural cooling air currents Energy conservation was achieved as a result of a whole
that are effective even on warmer, windless days. In the dining building, integrated, high-performance design. Key efficiency
and multipurpose rooms, the building is designed to promote factors included the deletion of air conditioning for cooling,