DD Swarajya Approvals
DD Swarajya Approvals
DD Swarajya Approvals
1 | P1 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
By-
Quantum ProjectInfra Pvt. Ltd.
www.quantumrealty.co.in
2 | P2 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
List of Tables
Table 1: Brief Details of the Location........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Table 2: Project Details Provided by Developer......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Table 3: Building wise Details of the Project.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 15
Table 4: List of Consultants.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Table 5: Approvals for the Project............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Table 6: Approval Status............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table 7: Risk Matrix for Balance Approvals............................................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Table 8: Area Calculations........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Table 9: Loading Calculation areas as per Developer............................................................................................................................................................................. 32
Table 10: Proposed Parking......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
Table 11: Approval Premium Cost Comparison....................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table 12: Paid Challans................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 37
Table 13 : Status of theBuilding - (Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4).............................................................................................................................................................................. 40
Table 14 : Project Timeline as per Developer- Phase Wise.................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table 15: Project Schedule Comparison- Developer Vs Quantum..........................................................................................................................................................42
Table 16: Cost Estimate as per Developer -Building Cost (Building B,C,D,E,F,G,H)*..........................................................................................................................44
Table 17: Escalation Calculation-Tower.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Table 18: Cost Estimate comparision Developer V/s Quantum – Building Cost Building (B,C,D,E,F,G,H).....................................................................................46
Table 19: Cost Estimate comparision Developer V/s Quantum – Commercial Cost...........................................................................................................................47
Table 20: Cost Estimate comparision Developer V/s Quantum - Total Project...................................................................................................................................49
Table 21 : List of Specifications..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64
Table 22 : List of Amenities........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
List of Figures
3 | P3 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
4 | P4 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
List of Abbreviations
5 | P5 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
6 | P6 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
Section 1. Background
Nippon (“Fund”) intends to invest in a projects by Arvind Smart Spaces (“Developer”), located at Pune.
Fund has assigned Quantum Project Infra Pvt. Ltd. (“Quantum”) to conduct Technical Due-Diligence for said project as per scope under Section 2.
Quantum submitted the draft Letter of Engagement to Developer on 21 st September 2022. Thereafter, Quantum received the Letter of Engagement from
the Developer on 23rd September 2022.
Fund has requested Quantum to set cut-off date of … which will be used for all the project related analysis such as status of approvals, status of
progress and cost incurred.
List of requirements/information/data to conduct the Technical Due-Diligence was sent by Quantum on 16 th September 2022. First set of information
was received on 1st October 2022.
The information was exchanged between Developer and Quantum upto 1st December 2022.
First Draft report was submitted to Fund on 15th March 2022. All the calculations and regulations are based on regulations valid until 15th March 2022,
further to that only updates have been made in approvals.
7 | P7 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
Buildability
Review of zoning regulation, development & policy regulation and other aspects to determine the total buildability of the project.
Check prevailing bye-laws and norms applicable for the project (including but not limited to):
o Permissible FSI
o Permissible TDR and other incentive FSI
o Height restrictions
o Setbacks, OSR norms etc.
o Parking norms
o TOD Norms
Any reservations for LIG/EWS or any other reservation.
Setbacks required from nalla / road / HT line / Road etc.
Reviewing and commenting on Project massing (applicable for land stage project if required details are made available).
Reviewing FSI and Non FSI area components
Reviewing Construction area, Carpet area and Saleable area workings
Commenting on appropriates of the total buildability of the project and recommending the changes if any.
8 | P8 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
Quantum shall basis the available information calculate the estimated saleable area for the project, it shall also check the fitment of the same based
on the concept plans / site survey plan shared by Developer.
Construction Schedule
Reviewing proposed project phasing and recommendations, if any.
Review Schedule from the point of accuracy and completeness of major activities/ milestones during Pre-construction, during construction and
Post construction stage including approvals required at various stages.
Recommending commencement data and completion dates for the buildings/ towers based on proposed procurement method, scale of work,
approvals states, etc.
9 | P9 a| gP ea g e
Technical Due-Diligence
10 |10
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Project Brief
The project is a residential development at Kothrud, Pune and it is under
construction. There is a total of 2 residential towers (A & B) + 1 Inclusive
housing (C). The proposed configuration of the project is B + G + UG + 12
Floors and P + 4 Floors for Inclusive housing.
11 |11
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
12 |12
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
13 |13
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
14 |14
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
List of Consultants
Table 4: List of Consultants
Sr. No Consultants Names
1. Architect - Design Vikas Achalkar
2. Architect- Liasoning Not Provided
3. Structural Not Provided
4. Plumbing & Electrical Not Provided
5. Fire & HVAC Not Provided
6. Landscape Not Provided
7. Environment Consultants Not Provided
8. IGBC Consultants Not Provided
Statutory Approvals
15 |15
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
The table below enlists the major approvals obtained by the Developer for the project.
Table 5: Approvals for the Project
Competent
Sr List of Comments by
Issuing Status Observations from the Approvals
No approvals Quantum
Authority
Entity: Neptune Developers Pvt Ltd.
Approval No/ Letter No: 601 - 281
Survey No: S.no.75, 76/8, 9(pt), 10, 2/3,
Validity: 1 Year from the date of receiving
Details: Developer has received IOD for the development of 3877.20
Sq Mt of proposed FSI area out of the total plot area of 16644.91 Sq
Mt for the following buildings
Building B1 to B5 – (G+3) (Residential)
Specific Conditions - A Quarterly report on the use of Fly ash bricks
and fly ash composite materials in the development of the project is
Obtained on to be submitted to the authority.
1. IOD KDMC POA of the other names mentioned in 7/12 to be submitted before
26.03.2009
obtaining CC.
POA of the successors of the co-owners of the plot who aren’t alive
anymore to be submitted before obtaining CC.
12 Mt wide road to be made before obtaining CC
Design & Construction should be observed and certified by
competent professional in terms of Earthquake resistant construction
for Building Plan Approval as well as OC
As HT line passes from plot NOC from MSEB to be obtained before
starting construction with the necessary changes required.
NOC from Fire Dept along with approved Layout Plan to be
submitted.
2. Layout Plan Entity: Neptune Developers Pvt. Ltd
Approval Approval No/ Letter No: IOD/601-281
Obtained on Survey No: Survey no. 75, 76/8, 9(pt), 10, 2/3,
KDMC
26.03.2009 Validity: N/A
Details: Developer has received Building Plan Approval with the
conditions mentioned in IOD 601-281 for the development of the
16 |16
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
17 |17
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
18 |18
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
19 |19
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
20 |20
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
21 |21
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
22 |22
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
23 |23
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
24 |24
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
25 |25
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
26 |26
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
27 |27
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
28 |28
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
29 |29
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
33. OC Approved
Entity: Neptune Developers Pvt. Ltd
As Built Plans
Obtained on Approval No/ Letter No: OCC/218/18
KDMC
12.04.2018 Survey No: S.no.1/3,S.no.4/1-5,6/2,7-10,12,14. S.no. 5/1 2. S.no
75,76/8-10, S. no.2/3,4, S.no. 76/28(Pt),24,12, S.no. 74/9-13
30 |30
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
31 |31
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
32 |32
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
33 |33
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Status of Approvals
Table 6: Approval Status
Sr.
Approval Commercial B C D E F G H
No
1. Sub Division Plan
2. Amalgamation Plan
3. Layout Plan Approval
4. Environmental Clearance
5. Consent to Establish
6. Fire IOD
7. Provisional Fire NOC
8. Defense NOC for height clearance
9. Royalty
10. Garden NOC
11. Tree Cutting Permission
12. NA Order
13. Building Plan Approval and CC
14. Plinth Checking Certificate
34 |34
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Not Applicable
35 |35
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Assumptions
Quantum has not verified any title & ownership documents.
Timelines represented by the Quantum are from the date of application by Developer with all the requisite documents and on a smooth functioning
of the authorities. The same shall have an impact based on functionality of the authority or congestion in the process or delay in application.
The risk assumed by the Quantum is based on its impact on the project. Low suggesting minimum impact & high suggesting maximum impact.
Developer has not provided any forged document for Quantum’s analysis. Quantum has asked for the latest documents available for the project
and Developer has provided the same for Quantum’s analysis.
36 |36
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
37 |37
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
38 |38
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Land Area: The plot area of 28,613.66 Sq Mt is as per the approved plan.
Road / reservations / Other Deductions: Deductions like road width or reservations are considered from the approved plan.
Non Developable areas: The project is affected by River Protection Belt which is demarcated on approved plan.
Land use Zone as per DP and Building use: Land use as per DP is Residential and Developer has proposed residential and commercial building
which is permissible as per UDCPR.
Inclusive housing: As the plot area is more than 4000 Sq Mt and Developer is proposing a residential development. Developer shall have to make
provisions for Inclusive housing in the layout at 20% of the base FSI
o In lieu of this Developer shall be entitled for equivalent FSI to be utilized on the remaining plot or TDR if Developer decides not to utilize
this additional FSI
o TDR shall be calculated based on the formulae – (Land Rate of generating plot / Land rate of receiving plot) X un-utilized additional FSI
Land Area for FSI calculation: The plot area for the purpose of FSI calculation is 20,602.49 Sq Mt, which is derived after deducting the reservation,
road and amenity areas from the plot area, which is appropriate as per the UDCPR.
Permissible FSI: The total permissible FSI for road width 30 Mt is 3.00 as per UDCPR.
Maximum Permissible FSI including additional FSI :
o Permissible Base FSI is 1.10 i.e., 22,700.81 Sq Mt
o Permissible Premium FSI is 0.50 i.e., 14,306.83 Sq Mt
o Permissible TDR is 1.40 i.e., 40,059.12 Sq Mt
o Permissible Ancillary FSI area is 46,240.06 Sq Mt.
Proposed FSI utilization for the project
o Proposed Base FSI area of 21,267.94 Sq Mt (Since FSI for Building A has been retained by landowner)
o Proposed Premium FSI area of 10,010.00 Sq Mt
o Development Right generated from the project 14,027.68 Sq Mt
o When Amenity Space, road area is surrendered 2 times TDR for the area surrendered is generated, when River protection belt area is
surrendered 1 time TDR is generated.
o TDR area to be purchased is 23,604.00 Sq Mt.
39 |39
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Loading Calculations
All figures mentioned below are in Sq Mt unless specified
40 |40
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Parking calculation
Table 10: Proposed Parking
for every tenant having no of cars no of scooter car park scoter park
Tenant having carpet no of units
carpet area per unit per uit required required
For Residential
Bldg B tene. Betn 40 - 80 sqmt ( for 2 tene.) 1 5 60 30 150
tene. Betn 80 - 150 sqmt ( for 1 tene.) 1 3 60 60 180
Visitor car parking (5%) 5 17
Total Parking 95 347
Bldg C tene. Betn 40 - 80 sqmt ( for 2 tene.) 1 5 60 30 150
tene. Betn 80 - 150 sqmt ( for 1 tene.) 1 3 60 60 180
Visitor car parking (5%) 5 17
Total Parking 95 347
41 |41
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
42 |42
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Assumptions
Quantum has calculated the loading factors based on the data represented by Developer, comments on the loading factor are based on the general
market practice, and variation based on the design is possible.
Quantum has analyzed all the area calculations considering the present byelaws. Any change in the byelaws after submission of the report may
change the area calculations.
Carpet area represented above is as represented by Developer which is cross checked based on standard thumb rules but it is not verified from
measurements of drawings.
RERA carpet area is the net usable floor area of an apartment, excluding the area covered by the external walls, areas under services shafts,
exclusive balcony or verandah area and exclusive open terrace area, but includes the area covered by the internal partition walls of the apartment.
All the above calculation are based on the proposed designs / approved plans as per Developer, if there is any change in them these calculations
shall not hold good.
Quantum has not physically measured the land area or the extent of reservations and other deductions; it is assumed that these are true
representations by Developer.
43 |43
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Particular Area in Sq Mt
Basic FSI
TDR
Premium FSI
Ancillary FSI
Total
Premium towards the Building A approval shall be paid by the Landowner
44 |44
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
45 |45
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
46 |46
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
25.2.2 9448/2
4541 Slum C BLUERAYS DEVELOPERS LLP D - - 1 7325 7325 13,00,97,600 39,33,000
019 022
25.2.2 10221/
4541 Slum C BLUERAYS DEVELOPERS LLP D - - 1 600 600 1,06,56,360 3,49,700
019 2022
47 |47
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Approval Premiums
The Land ready reckoner rate has been considered for FY 21-22 at Rs 29,180.00 per Sq Mt, it might vary at the time of payment of premium.
However, escalation in RR rate is not considered in Quantum’s recommended premiums.
As mentioned in area calculation section DR of 14027 Sq Mt is generated, balance TDR of 23,604 Sq Mt (refer calculation in section) will have to be
purchased from market; which is taken in the calculations.
The TDR area of 23,543.9 Sq Mt has already been purchased without GST at 36.98 Cr. This is the total market TDR required for the proejct.
The premium FSI has been considered at 35% of RR based on current regulations.
Ancillary FSI has been considered at 15% of RR based on current regulations.
The other approval costs are considered at Rs 50 per Sq Ft of total saleable area which includes revision of approvals, final approvals, and other
minor approvals like water, electrical, drainage noc, amendment in EC, amendment in CTE, OC etc.
Developer has proposed installment payment scheme for Ancillary FSI area and Premium FSI area, hence interest towards it has been calculated. As
per UDCPR initial 10% payment has to be made then equal instalments of 18% each year in 4 years has to be paid at 8.5% interest rate.
Total approval premium cost going forward as per Developer is 50.56 Cr and as per Qunatum it is 58.60 Cr.
o The major difference between Developer’s estimate and Qunatum’s estimate is the miscellaneous approval cost.
Assumptions
It is assumed that the paymmet for all the approvals already obtained has been cleared by Developer, this estimate is only for the going forward
approvals.
Escalation of 0% is considered in the calculation however, actual escalation of RR rate depends on revision of RR which is controlled by the Govt.
hence can change from the assumption taken in the calculation.
48 |48
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Project Schedule
The Developer has proposed Residential development named “Arvind Elan” located at Kothrud in Pune district. The entire layout of the project has 2
residential + 1 MHADA buildings namely Tower A, B and C (MHADA). The developer is proposing configuration of B+G+UG+12 floors for Tower A, B
and MHADA building having the configuration of P+4 floors. The total work is proposed in 1 Phase. The Developer has not provided the detailed schedule
for the project and Quantum has considered the start and end date for the complete project as per the RERA certificate. Quantum conducted the site visit
on 18.10.2022, work for RCC work for 12 th floor slab is completed in Tower A and B, Internal Finishing activity is started. Based on available information,
Quantum has analyzed the same in the section below. Any changes in configuration will have a subsequent effect on the schedule of the project &
accordingly comments will change.
Project Schedule
Table 14 : Project Timeline as per Developer – Tower Wise
Sr. No Particular A B C
Nov-18
1. Start Date
Dec-23
2. Finish Date
61
3. Total Duration
13
4. Remaining Duration from Dec’22 (In months)
49 |49
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Quantum has assumed that, after completion of RCC work, finishing will commence in full fledge for all buildings by the developer.
Quantum has estimated the project timelines for remaining activities based on the following assumption.
o 45 days of duration for RCC work to completed LMR & OHWT.
o 21 days of floor cycle for MEP works.
o 25 days floor cycle for Finishing works.
o External Development will commence after completion of RCC work of individual buildings.
o The developer will deploy necessary machinery like tower cranes, material hoist & other construction equipment.
Based on above comments below is schedule comparision between Developers and Quantum:
Table 15: Project Schedule Comparison- Developer Vs Quantum
As per the Developer As per Quantum
Sr. No Particular Duration in Duration in
Start Date End Date Start Date End Date
months months
1. Tower A Nov-18 Dec-23 61
2. Tower B Nov-18 Dec-23 61 Nov-18 Dec-23 61
3. Tower C (MHADA) Sep-21 Sep-23 24
4. External Development Jan-23 Sep-23 9
Overall Timeline Nov-18 Dec-23 61 Nov-19 Dec-23 61
Remaining Duration from Dec’22 (In months) 13 13
Note: Saleable area (SA) of 1,34,952 Sq Ft is used for calculations.
Assumptions
Construction work is not affected by the slow pace of sales, lack of finances or non-payment of contractors/vendors during the estimated
construction duration.
Optimum resources are deployed by the Developer and contractors as and when required for the project based on the project schedule.
Construction work is not affected because of the lack of statutory approvals.
Construction work is not affected by the condition of “Force Majeure”
50 |50
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Cost Estimate
The Developer has proposed Residential development named “Arvind Elan” located at Kothrud in Pune district. The entire layout of the project has 2
residential + 1 MHADA buildings namely Tower A, B and C (MHADA). The developer is proposing configuration of B+G+UG+12 floors for Tower A, B
and MHADA building having the configuration of P+4 floors. The total work is proposed in 1 Phase. The Developer has not provided the detailed schedule
for the project and Quantum has considered the start and end date for the complete project as per the RERA certificate. The construction was started back
in 2018 and as per the observation during the site visit on 18.10.2022, work for RCC work for 12 th floor slab is completed in Tower A and B, Internal
Finishing activity is started. Developer has not provided the detailed cost breakup for the project and as the construction was started in 2018, there is
limitation to calculate the exact escalation. Hence Quantum has worked out the CTC for the project for the balance activity based on the available
information in the section below. Any changes in configuration and specification will have a subsequent effect on the budget of the project & accordingly
comments will change.
11.1.1. Cost Estimates as represented by Developer
Table 16: Cost Estimate as per Developer
1 Civil
2 Finishing
3 MEP
4 External Development
5 Other Cost 2,890 39.00 16.43 22.57
6 EWS
7 Consultant Fees
8 Contingency
9 Escalation
Total Construction Cost (with Tax) 2,890 39.00 16.43 22.57
9 Tax @ 18% 441 5.95 2.51 3.44
Total Cost Excluding Tax 2,449 33.05 13.92 19.13
Note: Saleable area (SA) of 1,34,952 Sq Ft is used for calculations.
51 |51
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
52 |52
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Escalation: The budget shared by the Developer is inclusive of escalation. Quantum has analyzed the completion date for the project as Dec’23 with
the said assumptions and has not considered the escalation. However, if the project timeline is revised beyond the completion date an escalation of 4%
YOY will get added for the balance work.
Based on the above comments Quantum’s recommended cost estimate for the project is as shown below in the table below:
Table 17: Cost Estimate Comparison: Developer Vs Quantum
As per Developer As per Quantum
Sr. Cost Cost
Particulars Rate Per Budget Balance Rate Per Budget Balance
No. Incurred Incurred
Sq Ft of SA in Cr CTC in Cr. Sq Ft of SA in Cr CTC in Cr.
till Jun'22 till Jun'22
1 Civil 1,527 20.61
2 Finishing 594 8.01
3 MEP 466 6.29
4 External Development 135 1.82
16.43
5 Other Cost 2,890 39.00 16.43 22.57 27 0.36 24.04
6 EWS 114 1.54
7 Consultant Fees 68 0.91
8 Contingency 51 0.69
9 Escalation - -
Total Construction Cost with Taxes 2,890 39.00 16.43 22.57 2,982 40.24 16.43 23.81
10 Tax @ 18% 441 5.95 2.51 3.44 455 6.14 2.51 3.63
Total Cost Excluding Tax 2,449 33.05 13.92 19.13 2,527 34.11 13.92 20.18
Note: Saleable area (SA) of 1,34,952 Sq. Ft is used for calculations
53 |53
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Based on the above comments Quantum’s recommended cost estimate for the project is as shown below in the Graph:
20.61
6.29
8.01
54 |54
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Assumptions
Cost of Land, brokerage, approvals cost, sales office, advertising, admin & marketing expenses, site running cost etc. are not included in the budget.
Cost of Project Management Consultants and Cost Consultants (if any) is not included in the cost estimate.
Cost of Design Consultants is included in the budget
The budget is estimated based on the construction area given by Developer; hence any change in the construction area can change the project
budget.
Any significant design/specification change during the project life cycle after the completion of this report is not included in the budget.
Construction work is not affected by the condition of “Force Majeure”
Commencement of construction/completion of construction is not delayed beyond the timelines assumed in the project schedule section of the
report.
Construction will be carried out on B grade contractor on labour basis. Any significant change in the contracting strategy can lead to changes in the
budget.
Escalation is estimated as 4% year on year during the project duration. However, actual escalation in cost can be different.
Cost of any utility line (like power, water) from the source to the boundary of the project is not considered in the budget.
The budget is prepared based on Work Order / Purchase Orders shared by the Developer for awarded works. For all other works for which WO
/PO are not shared or works are not awarded, rates are considered based on current market rates.
The cost incurred numbers do not include any advances given to Vendors, Contractors or Consultants.
The value of inventory lying on site is not excluded from cost to complete.
The budget does not consider any past claims (if any) for completed works of contractors, vendors consultants or any anticipated claims in future (if
any).
55 |55
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Site Photographs
56 |56
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Club House Area STP, Transformer Room Area Ramp for Upper Ground Parking
57 |57
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Sample Flat - Hall Sample Flat - Kitchen Sample Flat - Terrace (Master Bed)
Sample Flat - Master Bedroom with Wooden Flooring Sample Flat - Bedroom Sample Flat - Toilet
58 |58
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Annexures
Proposed Site
Annexure 1 : DP Remark
59 |59
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Building A – LandOwner
60 |60
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
61 |61
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
62 |62
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
63 |63
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
64 |64
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
65 |65
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
66 |66
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
67 |67
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
68 |68
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
69 |69
P a| Pg aeg e
Technical Due-Diligence
Quantum has relied on information or opinions, both written and verbal, as current obtained from the Fund, Developer as well as from third parties
provided with, including limited information on the approvals, construction, which has been accepted as accurate in bona-fide belief. No responsibility is
assumed for technical information furnished by Lender, Developer and this is bonafidely believed to be reliable.
This Report is not based on the detailed technical assessment of the project site/construction. In this connection, Quantum has relied solely on the
information supplied to Quantum by Fund, and Developer.
Quantum's total aggregate liability to the Fund, and Developer including that of any third party claims, in contract, tort including negligence or breach of
statutory duty, misrepresentation, restitution or otherwise, arising in connection with the performance or contemplated performance of the services is
limited to an aggregate sum not exceeding the total fees paid for each instructions accepted. Quantum shall not be liable for any pure economic loss, loss of
profit, loss of business, depletion of goodwill, in each case whether direct or indirect or consequential or any claims for consequential loss compensation
whatsoever which, arise out of or in connection with services provided under this engagement.
Quantum endeavors to provide services to the best of ability and in bona-fide good faith. The proposed services and/or work product of Quantum shall be
only for the use of Fund, and Developer. If Fund, and Developer allows any third party to use or rely thereon the work product of Quantum, it shall be at
the sole risk of the Fund, and Developer and there shall be no liability on Quantum (including its Directors, and employees) towards any third party claim
for damages, economic loss or damage suffered arising out of or in connection with the services proposed to be rendered, direct or indirect due to
whatsoever reasons and however the loss or damage is caused. Fund and Developer shall assist and cooperate with Quantum to defend any third party
claim before any court of law or authorities, and indemnify Quantum of the cost of such proceedings.
This engagement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Indian laws and any dispute arising out of or in connection with the engagement,
including the interpretation thereof, shall be submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts in Mumbai.
*******
70 |70
P a| Pg aeg e