Rule 111 Reviewer
Rule 111 Reviewer
Rule 111 Reviewer
The reservation of the right to institute separately 1. Article 100 of RPC – every person criminally
the civil action shall be made before the liable for a felony is also civilly liable
prosecution starts presenting its evidence and 2. Article 2176 of New Civil Code – whoever by
under circumstances affording the offended party act or omission causes damage to another there
a reasonable opportunity to make such being fault or negligence is obliged to pay for
reservation. When the offended party seeks to the damage done
enforce civil liability against the accused by way
of moral, nominal, temperate, or exemplary Exceptions: No civil action if
damages without specifying the amount thereof 1. The offended party waived the action
in the complaint or information, the filing fees 2. When it reserved its right to institute it
thereof shall constitute a first lien on the separately
judgment awarding such damages. Where the 3. When it has instituted the civil action
amount of damages, other than actual, is prior to the criminal action
specified in the complaint or information, the
corresponding filing fees shall be paid by the Dual Concept of Civil Liability:
offended party upon the filing thereof in court. - Means that civil liability may also arise
from criminal actions or quasi-delicts
Except as otherwise provided in these Rules, no
filing fees shall be required for actual damages. Section 2. When separate civil action
No counterclaim, crossclaim or third-party
complaint may be filed by the accused in the
is suspended.
— After the criminal action has been commenced,
criminal case, but any cause of action which
the separate civil action arising therefrom cannot
could have been the subject thereof may be
be instituted until final judgment has been entered
litigated in a separate civil action.
in the criminal action. If the criminal action is filed
after the said civil action has already been
(b) The criminal action for violation of Batas
instituted, the latter shall be suspended in
Pambansa Blg. 22 shall be deemed to include the
whatever stage it may be found before judgment
corresponding civil action. No reservation to file
on the merits. The suspension shall last until final
such civil action separately shall be allowed.
judgment is rendered in the criminal action.
Upon filing of the aforesaid joint criminal and
civil actions, the offended party shall pay in full
the filing fees based on the amount of the check
involved, which shall be considered as the actual
damages claimed. Where the complaint or
information also seeks to recover liquidated,
Nevertheless, before judgment on the merits is Right to Substitution
rendered in the civil action, the same may, upon Information by Filing a New
motion of the offended party, be consolidated
with the criminal action in the court trying the
one, when:
criminal action. In case of consolidation, the Pursuant to Amendment and
evidence already adduced in the civil action shall Substitution of Information under
be deemed automatically reproduced in the Section 14 of the Rule 110
criminal action without prejudice to the right of
the prosecution to cross-examine the witnesses 1. Shall be no judgment has been
presented by the offended party in the criminal rendered yet
case and of the parties to present additional 2. Shall not place the accused on
evidence. The consolidated criminal and civil double jeopardy
actions shall be tried and decided jointly.
NOTE: This right is not Absolute,
During the pendency of the criminal action, the because it is subject to various
running of the period of prescription of the civil considerations.
action which cannot be instituted separately or
whose proceeding has been suspended shall be
tolled. Section 4. Effect of death on
civil actions.
The extinction of the penal action does not carry — The death of the accused after arraignment
with it extinction of the civil action. However, the and during the pendency of the criminal action
civil action based on delict shall be deemed shall extinguish the civil liability arising from the
extinguished if there is a finding in a final delict. However, the independent civil action
judgment in the criminal action that the act or instituted under section 3 of this Rule, or which
omission from which the civil liability may arise thereafter is instituted to enforce liability arising
did not exist. from other sources of obligation may be
continued against the estate or legal
What are suspended: representative of the accused after proper
1. Only the separate civil action arising substitution or against said estate.
therefrom may be suspended
The heirs of the accused may be substituted for
2. Independent civil actions are not suspended the deceased without requiring the appointment
and may continue even criminal action has of an executor or administrator and the court
been instituted, but only one remedy may be may appoint guardian ad litem for the minor
claimed by the offended party, so he should heirs. The court shall forthwith order said legal
choose the bigger one – criminal institution representative or representatives to appear and
be substituted within a period of thirty (30) days
Section 3. When civil action may from notice.
proceeded independently.
— In the cases provided for in Articles 32, 33, 34 A final judgment entered in favor of the offended
and 2176 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, the party shall be enforced in the manner especially
independent civil action may be brought by the provided in these rules for prosecuting claims
offended party. It shall proceed independently against the estate of the deceased. If the accused
of the criminal action and shall require only a dies before arraignment, the case shall be
preponderance of evidence. In no case, however, dismissed without prejudice to any civil action
may the offended party recover damages twice the offended party may file against the estate of
for the same act or omission charged in the the deceased.
criminal action.
The respondent shall not be allowed to file a No complaint or information may be filed or
motion to dismiss in lieu of a counter-affidavit. dismissed by an investigating prosecutor without
the prior written authority or approval of the
(d) If the respondent cannot be subpoenaed, or if provincial or city prosecutor or chief state
subpoenaed, does not submit counter- prosecutor or the Ombudsman or his deputy.
affidavits within the ten (10) day period, the
investigating officer shall resolve the Where the investigating prosecutor recommends
complaint based on the evidence presented by the dismissal of the complaint, but his
the complainant. recommendation is disapproved by the
provincial or city prosecutor or chief state
(e) The investigating officer may set a hearing if prosecutor or the Ombudsman or his deputy on
there are facts and issues to be clarified from a the ground that a probable cause exists, the
party or a witness. The parties can be present at latter may, by himself, file the information against
the hearing but without the right to examine or the respondent, or direct any other assistant
cross-examine. They may, however, submit to the prosecutor or state prosecutor to do so without
investigating officer questions which may be conducting another preliminary
asked to the party or witness concerned. investigation.
The hearing shall be held within ten (10) days This part, it can be the prosecutor himself
from submission of the counter-affidavits and who can file the information after finding a
other documents or from the expiration of the probable cause
period for their submission. It shall be terminated
within five (5) days. If upon petition by a proper party under such
rules as the Department of Justice may prescribe
(f) Within ten (10) days after the investigation, the or motu proprio, the Secretary of Justice reverses
investigating officer shall determine whether or or modifies the resolution of the provincial or city
not there is sufficient ground to hold the prosecutor or chief state prosecutor, he shall direct
respondent for trial. the prosecutor concerned either to file the
corresponding information without conducting
Section 4. Resolution of investigating another preliminary investigation, or to dismiss or
prosecutor and its review. move for dismissal of the complaint or
— If the investigating prosecutor finds cause to information with notice to the parties. The same
hold the respondent for trial, he shall prepare rule shall apply in preliminary investigations
the resolution and information. He shall conducted by the officers of the Office of the
certify under oath in the information that he, or Ombudsman.
as shown by the record, an authorized officer, has
personally examined the complainant and Section 5. Resolution of investigating
his witnesses; that there is reasonable ground judge and its review.
to believe that a crime has been committed and — Within ten (10) days after the preliminary
that the accused is probably guilty thereof; that investigation, the investigating judge shall
the accused was informed of the complaint and of transmit the resolution of the case to the
the evidence submitted against him; and that he provincial or city prosecutor, or to the
was given an opportunity to submit controverting Ombudsman or his deputy in cases of offenses
evidence. Otherwise, he shall recommend the cognizable by the Sandiganbayan in the exercise of
dismissal of the complaint. (The duty of its original jurisdiction, for appropriate action. The
prosecuting officer) resolution shall state the findings of facts and
the law supporting his action, together with the
Within five (5) days from his resolution, he shall record of the case which shall include:
forward the record of the case to the provincial or
city prosecutor or chief state prosecutor, or to the (a) the warrant, if the arrest is by virtue of a
Ombudsman or his deputy in cases of offenses warrant;
cognizable by the Sandiganbayan in the exercise
of its original jurisdiction. They shall act on the (b) the affidavits, counter-affidavits and other
resolution within ten (10) days from their receipt supporting evidence of the parties;
Trial Court, or Municipal Circuit Trial Court may
be conducted by either the judge or the
(c) the undertaking or bail of the accused and the prosecutor.
order for his release;
When conducted by the prosecutor, the procedure
(d) the transcripts of the proceedings during the for the issuance of a warrant or arrest by the judge
preliminary investigation; and shall be governed by paragraph (a) of this section.
When the investigation is conducted by the judge
(e) the order of cancellation of his bail bond, himself, he shall follow the procedure provided in
if the resolution is for the dismissal of the section 3 of this Rule. If the findings and
complaint. recommendations are affirmed by the provincial
or city prosecutor, or by the Ombudsman or his
Within thirty (30) days from receipt of the deputy, and the corresponding information is
records, the provincial or city prosecutor, or filed, he shall issue a warrant of arrest. However,
the Ombudsman or his deputy, as the case may without waiting for the conclusion of the
be, shall review the resolution of the investigating investigation, the judge may issue a warrant of
judge on the existence of probable cause. Their arrest if he finds after an examination in writing
ruling shall expressly and clearly state the facts and under oath of the complainant and his
and the law on which it is based and the parties witnesses in the form of searching question and
shall be furnished with copies thereof. They shall answers, that a probable cause exists and that
order the release of an accused who is detained if there is a necessity of placing the respondent
no probable cause is found against him under immediate custody in order not to frustrate
the ends of justice.
Section 6. When warrant of arrest
may issue. (c) When warrant of arrest not necessary.
(a) By the Regional Trial Court. — A warrant of arrest shall not issue if the
— Within ten (10) days from the filing of the accused is already under detention pursuant
complaint or information, the judge shall to a warrant issued by the municipal trial court in
personally evaluate the resolution of the accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, or if
prosecutor and its supporting evidence. He may the complaint or information was filed pursuant to
immediately dismiss the case if the evidence on section 7 of this Rule or is for an offense penalized
record clearly fails to establish probable cause. If by fine only. The court shall then proceed in the
he finds probable cause, he shall issue a exercise of its original jurisdiction
warrant of arrest, or a commitment order
if the accused has already been arrested pursuant Section 7. When accused lawfully
to a warrant issued by the judge who conducted arrested without warrant.
the preliminary investigation or when the — When a person is lawfully arrested without a
complaint or information was filed pursuant to warrant involving an offense which requires a
section 7 of this Rule. preliminary investigation, the complaint or
information may be filed by a prosecutor without
In case of doubt on the existence of probable need of such investigation provided an inquest has
cause, the judge may order the prosecutor to been conducted in accordance with existing rules.
present additional evidence within five (5)
days from notice and the issue must be resolved In the absence or unavailability of an inquest
by the court within thirty (30) days prosecutor, the complaint may be filed by the
from the filing of the complaint of information offended party or a peace office directly with the
proper court on the basis of the affidavit of the
offended party or arresting officer or person.
(b) By the Municipal Trial Court.
— When required pursuant to the second Before the complaint or information is filed, the
paragraph of section 1 of this Rule, the person arrested may ask for a preliminary
preliminary investigation of cases falling under investigation in accordance with this Rule, but he
the original jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Trial must sign a waiver of the provisions of Article 125
Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Municipal of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, in the
presence of his counsel.
(10) days after the filing of the complaint or
information, the judge finds no
Delict
- It is the wrongful act or omission
accompanied by intention
- This is the combination of criminal liability
and civil liability
- A civil liability arising from crime.
Punishable under Article 365 of the RPC
pursuant to Art. 100 of RPC
Quasi-Delict
- Wrongful act or omission is accompanied by
negligence
- Civil liability arising from negligence is
punishable under Art. 2176-2194 of Civil
Code
Quasi-delict/extra-contractual
Whoever by act or omission causes damage to
another, by fault or negligence, is obliged to
pay for the damages caused.