Agronomy 11 01586
Agronomy 11 01586
Agronomy 11 01586
Article
The Evaluation and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources
Collected in Lithuania
Denise F. Dostatny 1, * , Aleksandra Korzeniewska 2 , Grzegorz Bartoszewski 2 , Ryszard Rawski 3 ,
Karolina Kaźmińska 2 and Bronislovas Gelvonauskis 4
1 National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, National Research
Institute, Radzików, 05-870 Błonie, Poland
2 Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life
Sciences, Nowoursynowska, 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland; aleksandra_korzeniewska@sggw.edu.pl (A.K.);
grzegorz_bartoszewski@sggw.edu.pl (G.B.); karolina_kazminska@sggw.edu.pl (K.K.)
3 Polish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden, Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin,
ul. Prawdziwka, 2, 02-973 Warsaw, Poland; pomologia@obpan.pl
4 Plant Gene Bank, Stoties 2, Akademija, 58343 Kedainiai, Lithuania; b.gelvonauskis@agb.lt
* Correspondence: d.dostatny@ihar.edu.pl
Abstract: The present work compiles the results of three-year expeditions organized between 2011
and 2013 aimed at plant crop collection in the area of Lithuania, an Eastern European country.
Accessions of fruit trees, vegetables, cereals, forage, industrial, fibrous, medical, and spice crops
as well as accompanying segetal plants were collected in 5 ethnographic regions of Lithuania. In
total, 1010 samples of seeds, bulbs, and plant grafts were obtained. The majority of the collected
samples belonged to the Cucurbitaceae, Fabaceae, Solanaceae, Alliaceae, and Rosaceae families. The
Citation: Dostatny, D.F.;
accessions were described and deposited in the long-term storage in Lithuanian and Polish Gene
Korzeniewska, A.; Bartoszewski, G.;
Banks. Almost all collected cucumbers, pumpkins, squashes, and oat plants were morphologically
Rawski, R.; Kaźmińska, K.;
Gelvonauskis, B. The Evaluation and
characterized in field experiments. Cucurbita pepo accessions showed high morphological diversity,
Conservation of Plant Genetic while limited diversity of cucumber accessions was observed. Oat plants were characterized by high
Resources Collected in Lithuania. morphological diversity and resistance to diseases present in some of the investigated accessions.
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586. https:// Further characterization of collected apple trees and other accessions is underway. Obtaining
doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081586 germplasm in the area of Lithuania fulfills a gap in current plant crop collections. Collected material
could be valuable for pre-breeding evaluation and further breeding programs as well as the study of
Academic Editors: genetic diversity.
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis and
Iakovos Pantelides Keywords: agrobiodiversity; collection missions; gene bank; genetic erosion; evaluation
In Lithuania, the National Plant Genetic Resources (PGR) program was founded in
1993 with the Lithuanian Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry as its coordination
center. The Baltic-Nordic Plant Genetic Resources project was initiated by the Nordic Gene
Bank (NGB) in 1994. The main objective of these projects was to develop the national
PGR conservation network in Lithuania. Eight institutions are involved in the activity of
collection, investigation, and conservation of plant genetic resources. The Government of
the Republic of Lithuania decided to establish the Gene Bank on the 1 January 2004. Its
main functions include coordination activities for the collection, research, conservation,
and use of the national plant genetic resources in Lithuania and preservation of the genetic
material in long-term storage [5].
The area for the collection of the plant genetic resources in this study is connected
with the historical association of Lithuania and Poland [6]. This area was to a certain
extent inhabited by the Poles; therefore, similar cultivation methods and practices can
be observed in some regions of Lithuania. In those times, an extensive exchange of seed
material and information concerning running a homestead occurred. Thus, the joined
search for common gene resources in these two countries.
During expeditions, besides passport data, the collectors recorded valuable knowledge
shared by farmers about traits that they valued in the plants, and the ways they cultivated,
harvested, and processed them. This information is a treasure trove of data that can
also help us understand the consequences of climate changes and changes in agricultural
practices better [7].
The purpose of field expeditions to Lithuania was to collect seeds, bulbs, and plant
grafts for further propagation and evaluation, and to deposit the collected accessions in
long-term storage and in the collection of living plants both in the National Center for Plant
Genetic Resources at Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute—the National Research
Institute (NCPGR-PBAI-NRI) in Radzików, Poland and in the Lithuanian Gene Bank.
2. Study Area
Lithuania is situated on the east coast of the Baltic Sea. Distance from the Baltic
Sea coast to the eastern border is 373 km and from the north to south, 276 km. The
area of Lithuania is 65.3 -km2 and its agricultural area is 29.5 km2 [8]. The lowlands
make up approximately 75% of the area. Because of the geographic location, the climate
is transitional, maritime and continental. The average monthly temperature in winter
(December, January, February) is −2.8 ◦ C, in spring (March, April, May) 6.5 ◦ C, in summer
(June, July, August) 16.8 ◦ C and in autumn (September, October, November) 7.1 ◦ C. The
Baltic Sea’s influence on the climate is observed only in the coastal region. The temperature
in autumn and winter is 2–3 ◦ C higher in the west than in the east while in spring and
summer it is relatively higher in the east. The soil temperature in winter is 0.5 ◦ C lower
than the air temperature, and in summer it is 3–6 ◦ C higher whereas the highest soil surface
temperature is observed on the coast. Furthermore, the vegetation period in the west lasts
for 145–160 days and is shorter in the eastern parts of Lithuania. Annual precipitation varies
from 560 to 910 mm with an average of 695 mm. The smallest amount of precipitation
falls in April and February (36–38 mm) and the highest in July and August (77 mm).
The highest yearly precipitation amount falls on the western and south-western Žemaičiai
Upland whereas the smallest falls on the north-eastern parts of this region. Climate changes
observed in the last decade (2001–2010) caused an increase in the average air temperature,
mostly in the spring months and in July. Furthermore, climate anomalies, including heavy
rainfalls, are becoming more frequent [9].
According to the World Bank, agricultural land (% of land area) in Lithuania was
reported at 47.16% in 2016 [10]. About 2.5 million ha constitute land under agricultural
crops (corn, forage grasses, and pastures). Large (apple, pear, sour cherry) and small
(strawberry, black and red currants, raspberry, high bush blueberry) fruits trees are grown
commercially in more than 8.5 thousand ha.
Agronomy 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 24
(strawberry, black and red currants, raspberry, high bush blueberry) fruits trees are grown
commercially in more than 8.5 thousand ha.
Soil
Soiltypes
typesvaryvaryfrom
from region
region to to
region in Lithuania
region in Lithuania [11].[11].
Low-fertility acid soddy
Low-fertility pod-
acid soddy
zolic sandy
podzolic loams
sandy as well
loams as sands
as well and and
as sands drained podzolic
drained gleysgleys
podzolic occupy about
occupy 63%63%
about of the
of
area. Fertile
the area. soddy
Fertile calcareous,
soddy predominantly
calcareous, predominantlyloams, and drained
loams, soddy
and drained gleysgleys
soddy covercover
26%
of theof
26% area.
the Four
area. regions in terms
Four regions in of soil types
terms of soilare identified.
types In the central
are identified. In the part of Lithua-
central part of
Lithuania,
nia, the most the most productive
productive soils aresoils are located;
located; the westernthe western
part has part hasacid
wetter wetter
soils;acid
the soils;
east
thethe
of east of the has
country country
sandy hashills
sandyandhills and woodlands;
woodlands; in northern in northern areas,
areas, there is there is a of
a region region
cal-
of calcareous
careous typeThe
type soils. soils. The
soil typesoil
intype in the regions
the regions where the where the material
material was collected
was collected is varied.is
varied.
More Moreabout
details detailsthe
about the distribution
distribution of soilare
of soil types types are provided
provided by Jukneviciute
by Jukneviciute and Lauri-and
Laurinavicius
navicius [11]. [11].
Lithuania is divided
Lithuania divided into
into55ethnographic
ethnographicregions:
regions: Aukštaitija, DzDzūkija,
Aukštaitija, ūkija, Mažoji
MažojiLietuva,
Lie-
Suvalkija, and Žemaitija (Figure
tuva, Suvalkija, and Žemaitija (Figure 1). 1).
result of a very diversified landscape, the multitude of hills, lakes, and forests, owing to
which each village has become a separate world of its own.
2.2. Dzūkija
The south-eastern part of Lithuania, called Dzūkija or Dainava, has a different local
dialect and a distinctive culture. Most of this region belongs to the Alytus District, which
is characterized by the lowest population density and the highest percentage of forest
cover. In this part of Lithuania, there are many areas protected under the EU Nature 2000.
Because of the higher quality of soils, agriculture plays an important role there. The life
of many people in Dzūkija is still connected with the forest. Dzūkija was not subject to
strong civilization influences and social changes as was the case in other parts of Lithuania.
Owing to this, one can find here villages with traditional wooden architecture located near
the mosaic of plots, pastures, and meadows lying by the rivers.
2.5. Žemaitija
This is a region in the north-western part of Lithuania. In geographical terms, it
constitutes the Žemaitija Lake District with moraines which are built of clays, sands, and
marls. The soils are of medium fertility. There are many marshes and lakes formed by the
glacier. The hilly and wavy surface is covered with cultivable fields, meadows, pastures,
and spruce forests.
these acronyms have been abbreviated to the last three letters and the year: LIT11, ZAP12,
and CEN13.
During the collection of material, passport data for each accession were completed and
documented. In the case of wild-type harvest, the site was described [17]. The collection
of genetic material was made in accordance with international and national regulations
and the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) was assigned [18]. A part of the
collected material has been forwarded to the Lithuanian Gene Bank and the second part is
kept at National Center for Plant Genetic Resources at the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization
Institute—National Research Institute (NCPGR-PBAI-NRI), Radzików, Poland.
A part of the cereal accessions was collected in the form of blends. During the cleaning
of these materials, they were divided into separate accessions, according to the belonging
species. When the study area was explored, most of the plants accompanying cultivation,
segetal plants, had already been damaged in the fields after the harvest. Because of this,
in order to identify this plant group, seeds in the collected cereal crop accessions, both
from blends and from individual species, were marked. Separated seeds were identified
according to Kulpa [19].
crown rust). The descriptors were used according to International Board for Plant Genetic
Resources (IBPGR) [25]. The resistance scale was used instead of the susceptibility scale
(where 9 is a healthy non-lodging plant, and 1 refers to a less resistant, lodging plant)
according to the guidelines used in Poland (COBORU) [26].
4. Results
During three expeditions organized in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013 in 5 ethnographic
regions of Lithuania, seeds, bulbs, and grafts of 1010 accessions belonging to 5 plant groups
were collected and described (Table 1). The highest number of accessions was collected
in the Žemaitija region; it constituted 39.4% of all accessions. A big number of accessions
was collected in the Aukstaitija Region: 24.5% and Dzūkija Region: 21.5%. In other regions,
fewer accessions were collected: in Suvalkija 10.0% and in Mažoji Lietuva 4.7%. Among the
accessions collected, the biggest group was constituted by local populations or local varieties
of vegetable plants—632 accessions and it constituted as much as 62.5% of all collected
accessions. A lot of fruit trees and bushes varieties (13.7%, 139 accessions) and cereal plants
(13.6%, 125 accessions) were collected. Also, 43 accessions of medical and spice plants were
collected (4.7%); this share was bigger than in the case of forage (34 accessions, 3.3%) and
industrial crops (24 accessions, 2.2%) (Table 1). Together with cereals seeds, several segetal
species were collected (38 species of plants, which were not included in Table 1).
Table 1. Accessions collected during three expeditions to Lithuania in 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Table 1. Cont.
Table 1. Cont.
‘Meelis’ and others. The second group is made of varieties coming also from the countries
bordering the Baltic Sea, but they often occur in other European countries; these include,
among others: ‘Ananas Berżenicki’, ‘Strumiłłówka’ (Sierinka), different varieties of ‘An-
tonówka’, ‘Oliwka Żółta’ (Papierówka), ‘Suislepskie’, ’Glogierówka’ (Pepinka Litewska),
‘Truskawkowe Nietschnera’, ‘Charłamowskie’ and ‘Czarnoguz’. The third group consists of
varieties coming from Poland, Germany, France, England, or the Netherlands. This group
includes ‘Grafsztynek Inflancki’—a Dutch variety frequent in the whole area of Lithuania,
an equally popular French variety—‘Kronselska’, a Polish variety—‘Kosztela’, a German
variety—‘Reneta Landsberska’, or French varieties—‘Kalwila Biała Zimowa’ and ‘Reneta
Szara Francuska’.
In Table 2, 14 varieties are listed, divided according to their occurrence into individual
ethnographic regions. These are varieties chosen from 132 varieties marked during the
cataloging in the area of Lithuania which have proper names. Most of them were bred or
found in the area of the countries bordering the Baltic Sea and they are best adapted to the
climatic and soil conditions in the area. Additionally, the varieties were grouped by regions
in which they occurred. Some apple fruits and trees representing collected accessions of
Malus × domestica Borkh. are shown in Figure 2.
Table 2. Varieties of apple trees according to the ethnographic region of the collection.
4.2. Vegetables
A total of 632 accessions of vegetable crops were collected during the three expedi-
tions in the following regions: Žemaitija—240 accessions, Aukstaitija—183 accessions, and
Dzūkija—113 accessions. A lower number of accessions was collected in the Suvalkija
Region (62), and the fewest in the Mažoji Lietuva Region (34). The majority of the collected
accessions were annual (73%) and the others were biennial and perennial (27%) vegetable
species (Table 1). The 460 annual vegetable accessions belonged to five families: Fabaceae
(28.4%), Cucurbitaceae (22.5%), Solanaceae (18.5%), Apiaceae (2.2%), and Asteraceae (1.3%).
The other 172 accessions of biennial and perennial vegetable crops belonged to the families
Alliaceae (23.6%), Chenopodiaceae (1.43%) Apiaceae (0.95%), Brassicaceae (0.48%), Aster-
aceae (0.47%), and Polygonaceae (0.16%). Varieties and ecotypes from the families Fabaceae
(179), Cucurbitaceae (142) and Solanaceae (117) dominated among the collected accessions
of annual vegetable plants. Less numerous local populations of annual vegetable plants
were observed in families Apiaceae (14) and Asteraceae (8 accessions). Fourteen (14) local
populations of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) were collected, of which 10 accessions came from
the Žemaitija Region, as well as 8 local populations of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) coming
from the Suvalkija Region (5 accessions) (Table 1). Examples of collected vegetables are
shown in Figure 3.
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 10 of 25
Agronomy 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 24
Figure
Figure 2.
2. Apple
Apple fruits
fruits and
and aa tree
tree representing
representing collected
collected accessions
accessions of
of Malus
Malus ×
×domestica
domestica Borkh.
Borkh. Fruits
Fruits of
of ‘Pepina
‘Pepina Jana’
Jana’ (A),
(A),
‘Śmietankowe’ (B), ‘Cukrówka Litewska’, (C) and a tree of ‘Cukrówka Litewska’ (D).
‘Śmietankowe’ (B), ‘Cukrówka Litewska’, (C) and a tree of ‘Cukrówka Litewska’ (D).
Table 2. Varieties of apple trees according to the ethnographic region of the collection.
4.2.1. Cucurbit Vegetables
Ethnographic Region Local varieties and populations from the Cucurbitaceae
Varieties family (142 altogether) con-
stituted an Barchatnoje,
equally numerous Malinówka
group Bierżenicka,
among the Paniemuńskie
collected accessions Białe, Reneta
belonging to annual
Aukštaitija (Vilnius Region)
vegetable plantsLitewska,
(Table 1).Uspiech
The group included: Cucurbita pepo L. (55), Cucumis sativus L.
Dzūkija (Alytaus Region) Cukrówka
(47), Cucurbita maxima Litewska
Duchesne (39), and Citrullus lanatus (Thumb.) Matsum & Nakai (1).
The biggest number of accessions
Birutes belonging
Pepinas, Lofen, to Pepina
Meelis, this family
Jana,came from
Synap the Dzūkija
Bieloruskij, Region:
Śmietan-
Žemaitija (Šiaulių Region)
C. pepo (22), C. maxima (21), and C. sativus (17). In this region, cucurbits were grown in the
kowe, Talvenauding
Žemaitija (Raseinių Region) majority in home gardens.
Pepina Czernienko
To characterize the biological diversity of C. pepo, 23 accessions were selected and
examined
4.2. in a field experiment conducted in 2014. The accessions came from various
Vegetables
regions of Lithuania: Dzūkija (14), Aukstatija (5), Žemaitija (3), and Suvalkija (1). It
A total of 632 accessions of vegetable crops were collected during the three expedi-
was found that the examined accessions belonged to four different varietal groups of
tions in the following regions: Žemaitija—240 accessions, Aukstaitija—183 accessions, and
C. pepo. The majority of evaluated accessions were populations of pumpkins, vegetable
Dzūkija—113 accessions. A lower number of accessions was collected in the Suvalkija Re-
marrow, zucchini, or a mixture of pumpkin with vegetable marrow and zucchini. A
gion (62), and the fewest in the Mažoji Lietuva Region (34). The majority of the collected
single accession of the scallop was identified (LIT11 265). High diversity of evaluated
accessions were annual (73%) and the others were biennial and perennial (27%) vegetable
morphological features was observed within individual accessions collected. The most
species (Table
frequently 1). Thefruit
observed 460 annual vegetable
skin color accessions
was dark green orbelonged
green withto yellow
five families: Fabaceae
or orange spots
(28.4%), Cucurbitaceae (22.5%), Solanaceae (18.5%), Apiaceae (2.2%), and
or stripes, plain or with a different number of small bumps. There were also fruits withAsteraceae
(1.3%). The other 172 accessions of biennial and perennial vegetable crops belonged to the
Agronomy 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 24
Figure 3.
Figure Examplesof
3. Examples ofvegetables
vegetablescollected
collected in
in Lithuania
Lithuania during
during the
the expedition
expedition in
in 2012.
2012. Vegetables
Vegetables
belonging to the Cucurbitaceae
belonging Cucurbitaceae(A–C),
(A–C),Fabaceae
Fabaceae(D–F),
(D–F),Solanaceae
Solanaceae(G,H) and
(G,H) Alliaceae
and families
Alliaceae (I–L).
families (I–
L).
The second species of the Cucurbitaceae family, which is very frequently found in
Lithuania,
4.2.1. especially
Cucurbit in the Dzūkija (17 accessions) and Žemaitija (16 accessions) regions,
Vegetables
was cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Mature fruit traits and sex expression of 30 accessions
Local varieties and populations from the Cucurbitaceae family (142 altogether) con-
were characterized in the field experiment (Table 4). Plants of a single accession were
stituted an equally numerous group among the collected accessions belonging to annual
gynoecious (LIT11 034), whereas plants of four accessions were segregated for monoecious
vegetable plants (Table 1). The group included: Cucurbita pepo L. (55), Cucumis sativus L.
and gynoecious (LIT11 035, LIT11 128, LIT11 147, and LIT11 161), while the plants of 25
(47), Cucurbita maxima Duchesne (39), and Citrullus lanatus (Thumb.) Matsum & Nakai (1).
remaining accessions were monoecious. Limited variability of fruit features was observed
The biggest number of accessions belonging to this family came from the Dzūkija Region:
within the examined accessions. Mature fruits showed cream or brown skin color and for
C. pepo (22), C. maxima (21), and C. sativus (17). In this region, cucurbits were grown in the
many accessions, segregation for this trait within accession was observed. The color of
majority in home gardens.
fruit spines was white or dark (=brown or black) and also segregation for this trait within
To characterize the biological diversity of C. pepo, 23 accessions were selected and
accession was observed. The length of mature fruit ranged from 17.0 to 25.6 cm with an
examined
average ofin18.7a field
cm experiment
and 17.3 cmconducted in 2014.
for the ‘Trakai’ The accessions
reference variety. came fromof
The fruits various re-
collected
gions of Lithuania: Dzūkija (14), Aukstatija (5), Žemaitija (3), and Suvalkija
accessions, except two of them (LIT11 010 and LIT11 257), were similar in length and also (1). It was
found
similarthat the examined
to fruits accessions
of the ‘Trakai’ belonged
variety. to four different
Fruit diameter varietal
ranged from 6.4 groups
to 8.6 cmof with
C. pepo.
an
The majority
average ofcm
of 7.6 evaluated
and 8.3 accessions were populations
cm for reference. of pumpkins,
The majority of the testedvegetable marrow,
accessions were
zucchini,
similar toorthea ‘Trakai’
mixturevariety
of pumpkin with vegetable
of cucumber which was marrow and in
developed zucchini. A single
Lithuania acces-
in the region
sion of the scallop was identified
of Trakai for open-field cultivation. (LIT11 265). High diversity of evaluated morphological
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 12 of 25
Table 3. Varietal type, fruit, and seed traits of several collected Cucurbita pepo L. accessions.
Table 4. Plant sex and mature fruit characteristics of cucumber accessions (Cucumis sativus L.).
Within the accessions of C. maxima, a diversity of fruit skin color, weight, yield per
plant, and seed color was observed. C. maxima fruits had various skin colors (from green,
through grey, orange, to various shades of pink and red) and they often had two or more
colors. In the Dzūkija Region, it was observed that whole mature fruits of winter squash
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 14 of 25
were soured together with cabbage. A single accession of C. lanatus was collected in the
Mažoji Lietuva Region. The plants were grown undercover in a small foil tunnel. The fruit
size was about 2 kg, and it had green skin and pink flesh. According to the grower, the
seeds were brought from Georgia.
According to the farmers, it is the first bulb plant whose green chives were very tasty and
fit for consumption early in spring. The bulbils which formed gradually during the plant
growth were rarely used for consumption—they were used as a multiplication material.
Single accessions of three perennial species were collected and they belonged to the
Alliaceae family: Allium schenoprasum L. (chives) and Allium fistulosum L. (brunching onion)
as well as one species of biennial Allium ampeloprasum ssp. porrum J. Goy (leek).
In the group of biennial vegetables, seeds of single local populations of the Apiaceae
family were collected: carrots—Daucus carota L. (1), common parsnip—Pastinaca sativa L.,
(1) and common parsley—Petroselinum sativum L. ssp. crispum (4), from the Chenopodiaceae
family: red beet—Beta vulgaris L. (9), from the Brassicaceae family: head cabbage—Brassica
oleracea L. var. capitata L. f. alba (2) and cultivable swedes—Brassica napus L. var. napobrassica L.
Peterm. (1) as well as from the Polygonaceae family—rhubarb—Rheum rhaponticum L. (1).
4.3. Cereals, Forage, Industrial and Fibrous Crops as Well as Segetal Plants Included in the Crop
Collected Material
A total of 125 accessions of cereal plants were collected and some of them were blends.
The blends were very well prepared by the local populations. The majority of them are
cereals grown for feeding. More detailed results for common oat were obtained, for which
evaluation was conducted in a 2-year field experiment (2012 and 2013) with the material
collected in 2011 and 2012. The accessions collected in 2013 were not included in the results
of this article because they come only as mixtures.
PART A (2012)
2.50 45
40
2.00 35
30
TGM [g]
1.50 25
Yield [kg]
1.00 20
15
0.50 10
5
0.00 0
PART B (2013)
2.50 40
35
2.00 30
TGM [g]
1.50 25
Yield [kg]
20
1.00 15
0.50 10
5
0.00 0
ZAP12 006
ZAP12 184
ZAP12 008
ZAP12 190
ZAP12 217
ZAP12 240
ZAP12 308
ZAP12 153
ZAP12 023
ZAP12 028
ZAP12 046
ZAP12 338
ZAP12 360
ZAP12 289
ZAP12 309
ZAP12 218
ZAP12 389
ZAP12 390
ZAP12 383
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Figure 5. Yield parameters of Avena sativa L. accessions gathered in Lithuania and evaluated in 2012 and 2013 (modified
Figure 5. Yield parameters of Avena sativa L. accessions gathered in Lithuania and evaluated in 2012 and 2013 (modified
from Kloc and Dostatny, 2020) [27].
from Kloc and Dostatny, 2020) [27].
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 18 of 25
Agronomy 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 24
PART A (2012)
10 10
8 8
6 6
4 4
2 2
0 0
PART B (2013)
10 10
6 6
4 4
2 2
0 0
ZAP12 184
ZAP12 390
ZAP12 008
ZAP12 190
ZAP12 217
ZAP12 240
ZAP12 308
ZAP12 153
ZAP12 023
ZAP12 028
ZAP12 046
ZAP12 338
ZAP12 360
ZAP12 006
ZAP12 289
ZAP12 309
ZAP12 218
ZAP12 389
ZAP12 383
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Celer
Figure 6. Resistance to powdery mildew and crown rust in cultivated Avena sativa L. gathered in Lithuania and evaluated
Figure 6. Resistance to powdery mildew and crown rust in cultivated Avena sativa L. gathered in Lithuania and evaluated
in Poland in 2012 and 2013 (modified from Kloc and Dostatny, 2020) [27].
in Poland in 2012 and 2013 (modified from Kloc and Dostatny, 2020) [27].
5. Discussion
Accessions collected in 2012 and observed in 2013 presented a large variability with
Plant germplasm
low individuals (100 cm) is collected
and highin orderup
plants to to
preserve
160 cmit, as well4B).
(Figure as to
Forconserve
the 2012and expand
population
the genetic collected
accessions base that in canŽemaitija,
be used inthe breeding
observed programs
trend was or can
not have
similarpotentially direct use
to the populations
[28]. Bioversity
collected International
in other regions: thesupported a series of
lower individuals collecting
did not always expeditions
have highworldwide,
TGW and most with
the objective
of them had to
lowsystematically
yields, most collect and conserve
likely because they werelandraces
eithercultivated by farmers
blended (i.e., and
came from
cerealcrop
their mixtures) or grown
wild relatives for feed,
which were as a from
lost forage plant.
fields and During
naturalobservations
habitats [7]. conducted
Plant collect-in
2013,
ing a yield from
activities 1 to 1.58
date back to thekg/2.5 m2 was
beginning of observed
agriculture, and the the
with TGW ranging
first steps offrom
plant 19domes-
to 33 g
(Figure 5B)
tication [29].was noted. Eight (8) out of 19 accessions showed no infection with powdery
mildew, whereas
Situated in thecrown
Neman rustBasin
was observed
of the Balticin most
Sea, of the accessions
Lithuania is one (Figure 6B). While
of the Eastern Euro-in
reference
pean varieties,
countries which powdery
shares mildew infection was
its south-western found
border in Poland.
with the range between
The 4 and 6,sit-
geographical in
the case of collected local varieties it was between 7 and 9.
uation of Lithuania and the relatively severe climate in this part of Europe results in low
The segetal
diversity of plantplants
geneticconstituted
resources; anhowever,
additionalingroup that was
Lithuania not included
tradition of home in gardens
the table,ex-
as
they and
ists, weresuch
separated
gardens from areuncleaned
recognized cereal material and
as hotspots not collected as separate
of agrobiodiversity accessions.
[30]. Recently, lo-
Thirty-eight
cally grown (38) weed species
landraces were found.including
and populations, Among segetal
home plants
gardens, in collected
have been accession cere-
substituted
by Chenopodium
als,modern album
varieties, L. was
thus the speciesexpeditions
collaborative occurring most often. the
to protect However,
diversityGalium aparine L.,
of Lithuanian
Fallopia convolvulus (L.) Á. Löve,
local crop biodiversity were organized. Artemisia vulgaris L., Galeopsis tetrahit L., Polygonum lapathi-
folium L., Stellaria media (L.) Vill., Viola arvensis Murray also occurred frequently.
The interview was an important part of the expedition as, for example, one can learn
about the ripening time of fruit trees’ fruits, important performance parameters of the
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 19 of 25
5. Discussion
Plant germplasm is collected in order to preserve it, as well as to conserve and expand
the genetic base that can be used in breeding programs or can have potentially direct
use [28]. Bioversity International supported a series of collecting expeditions worldwide,
with the objective to systematically collect and conserve landraces cultivated by farmers
and their crop wild relatives which were lost from fields and natural habitats [7]. Plant
collecting activities date back to the beginning of agriculture, with the first steps of plant
domestication [29].
Situated in the Neman Basin of the Baltic Sea, Lithuania is one of the Eastern European
countries which shares its south-western border with Poland. The geographical situation
of Lithuania and the relatively severe climate in this part of Europe results in low diversity
of plant genetic resources; however, in Lithuania tradition of home gardens exists, and
such gardens are recognized as hotspots of agrobiodiversity [30]. Recently, locally grown
landraces and populations, including home gardens, have been substituted by modern
varieties, thus collaborative expeditions to protect the diversity of Lithuanian local crop
biodiversity were organized.
The interview was an important part of the expedition as, for example, one can learn
about the ripening time of fruit trees’ fruits, important performance parameters of the
collected local varieties of vegetable and agricultural plant species, and can find out how
individual plants grown by a farmer are used. It was confirmed in the publication of
Genebank Standards [21].
Later maturing time and the selection of varieties occurring in Lithuania result from the
climatic and soil conditions, while the economic and cultural factors contribute to the high
occurrence of old fruit trees, whereas the reserve of species and varieties results from the
local climate. The maturing time of apple tree varieties found in Lithuania is also different
from the maturing time of the same varieties in the climatic conditions of Poland. Mentioned
varieties of apple trees cited in this article are relatively tolerant to lower temperatures, which
determines their scope in the environmental conditions of Lithuania.
Varieties of apple trees that were cataloged in Lithuania were bred in that country
or came from neighboring countries having similar climates. The biggest source of the
multiplication material included orchards remaining from old estates or left by known
growers who lived in the area of Lithuania at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.
An eminent biologist, breeder, and pomologist, Hrebnicki (1857–1941) was one of them,
and he published a pomology, ‘Atlas owoców’ (Fruit atlas) in Polish and Russian in Saint
Petersburg in 1906 [31]. Hrebnicki grew and described many varieties of apple trees, which
are not only known and grown in Lithuania but also in other European countries. The
researcher collected about 512 varieties of apple trees, 256 varieties of pear trees, and about
100 varieties of plum trees as well as many other species and varieties of fruit plants in
the Rous Estate near Dukštas in the Aukstaitija Region. Trees gathered there came from
Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, Poland (from the orchards of P. Hoser,
E. Jankowski, and J. Ślaski), and from Germany and North America. Apart from known
apple tree varieties occurring almost throughout Europe, there were some very rare ones
known only in Lithuania, bred or described by Hrebnicki, which were listed in the results
of this article.
Varieties obtained during the expeditions to Lithuania made it possible to learn about
the abundance of fruit crops and their health. The results show that many varieties occur
only in the area of Lithuania and they are the so-called local varieties which, according to
the literature, were grown or found in this territory within specific places and can only
be encountered there. ‘Paniemuńskie Białe’ is one of such varieties. According to Tuinyla
et al. [2], it comes from a place called Panemunia near Kaunas and was first described by
Hrebnicki. It occurs not only near Kaunas but also in the rest of the country. Another very
old variety found in Lithuania is ‘Cukrówka Litewska’ (Figure 2C,D), most often occurring
in the Alytaus Region, which is confirmed in the description by Smardzewski [32]. The
origin of this variety is unknown; it is very vital, which is confirmed by the occurrence of
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 20 of 25
very old specimens whose age was determined to be about 100 years during the expedition.
‘Birutės pepinas’ is another variety associated with this area of Europe. Tuinyla et al. [2]
wrote in their description that it comes from the vicinity of Kaunas, but it can also be
found in other regions of the country; however, it is not as popular as ‘Pepinka Litewska’
from which it originates. ‘Pepina Jana’ is a variety that was found and described by
Hrebnicki [31]. It occurs mainly in the Šiauliu˛ Region; however, to a smaller extent,
it can also be found in other regions of Lithuania. It does not typically occur outside
Lithuania. ‘Śmietankowe’ is a very interesting variety with delicious fruits. According to
Smardzewski [33], it comes from Žemaitija, but very frequently it can be found in the north
of Lithuania, in the Šiauliu˛ Region. Another variety that is very characteristic for the area
of Lithuania is ‘Malinówka Bierżenicka’. According to Hrebnicki [31], at the beginning of
the 20th century, it occurred in large numbers in the Ignalinos Region, but presently it is
very rare there; during the expedition, it was found only once in the Vilniaus Region.
There is a group of fruit tree varieties, which quite often occur in old orchards in
Poland and other European countries. They come mostly from countries bordering the
Baltic Sea and Russia, but also from France, the Netherlands, and Germany. In these
varieties, a significant difference can be observed between the fruit maturing time in
Lithuania and the time given in the literature. ‘Ananas Berżenicki’, ‘Antonówka Zwykła’,
‘Pepinka Litewska’, ‘Grafsztynek Inflancki’, ‘Kronselska’, ‘Oliwka Żółta’ (‘Papierówka’) and
‘Suislepskie’ are examples of such varieties. The difference in maturing time is from three
to four weeks, depending on the variety. According to Smardzewski [32] and Rejman [34],
‘Grafsztynek Inflancki’ matures at the end of August and at the beginning of September,
while in Lithuania it happened at the end of September and at the beginning of October.
Another variety that is very high in the popularity structure of the Lithuanian varieties is
‘Pepika Litewska.’ In Lithuania, the fruits mature at the beginning of October, whereas,
the maturing time in Poland is in mid-September [34]. According to Rejman [34], ‘Oliwka
Żółta’ and ‘Suislepskie’ are ready for consumption in Poland already at the end of July and
at the beginning of August, while in Lithuania—at the end of August and at the beginning
of September. ‘Kronselska’ deserves special attention. This variety is of French origin and
according to Smardzewski [32] it was grown in Cronsels near Troyes. Despite the fact that it
comes from areas with a warmer climate, it does very well in Lithuania and is often found
in old orchards. According to Rejman [34], in Poland, the ‘Kronselska’ variety matures
at the beginning of September, whereas in Lithuania at the end of September and at the
beginning of October.
The area of Lithuania constitutes a northern border of cultivation of several vegetable
crops including cucurbits, beans, and tomatoes. Collection of vegetable accessions in
Lithuania fulfilled the gaps in germplasm collections representing Central and Eastern
Europe. Regions that are most affluent in various vegetable plant genotypes included
Žemaitija, Aukstaitija, and Dzūkija.
Dzūkija is the region in which the cultivation of pumpkin, squashes, and cucumbers
in home gardens was observed most often. The highest number of cucurbits—C. pepo (22),
C. maxima (21), and C. sativus (17)—was collected there which constituted 36%, 40%, and
54% of all collected accessions for these species during the three expeditions to Lithuania
(Table 1), respectively. This is probably due to the climatic conditions favorable for the
cultivation of stenothermal plants in this region. In Lithuania, different varietal types of C.
pepo pumpkins and squashes are grown. The majority of C. pepo accessions were collected
in the Dzūkija (22), Žemaitija (15), and Aukstaitija (14). High diversification of performance
parameters was observed in the individual accessions of C. pepo. This is due to the fact
that C. pepo is an entomophilous species that crosses easily within botanical varieties.
In Lithuania and Poland, certain types of C. pepo pumpkins are called and recognized
as ‘Artroka’. The authorship of the ‘Artroka’ variety is attributed to a farmer named
Hejbowicz, who—at the beginning of the 20th century—obtained from Argentinian Indians
pumpkin seeds with strong medicinal properties. However, the fruits of this pumpkin did
not mature in the Lithuanian climate; therefore, he crossed it with a cold-tolerant variety
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 21 of 25
from the area of Trakai. Hejbowicz called the new variety ‘Artroka’ (a combination of words
Argentina and Trakai) and emphasized that it inherited all the medicinal properties from
the Argentinian Indian variety. Landrace ‘Artroka’ was characterized by dark green fruit
skin color with yellow spots, smooth surface or with little bumps and the flesh was yellow
and orange with a lot of hulled seeds. It seems that the ‘Artroka’ landrace does not exist
anymore because it was not maintained; however, this type of fruit can be observed in some
local pumpkin populations grown by farmers in Lithuania and Poland [35]. Collected C.
pepo accessions could be carefully studied and possibly useful to restore this landrace. There
are examples of successful restoration of local Cucurbita landraces for example ‘Berrettina
di Lungavilla’ in the Po valley in northern Italy [36].
Most of the cucumber accessions collected during the expeditions showed character-
istics typical for the ‘Trakai’ variety. Plants were monoecious with medium-sized (about
18 cm long) dark-thorned fruits. Only two accessions were characterized by longer fruits
(about 25 cm), one was gynoecius and four were segregated for sex type (Table 4). The
‘Trakai’ variety, famous in Lithuania, comes from the vicinity of the Trakai town near
Vilnius and is closely related to Karaimes. The ‘Trakai’ cucumber is considered to be
introduced in the 15th century when the Karaimes came to Lithuania from the Crimea and
specialized in growing ‘oriental’ vegetables including cucumber [37,38]. In 1844, Strumiłło
described ‘Trakai’ cucumbers as equally fruitful and juicy as the cucumbers of Russian
variety ‘Muromskij’ but bigger, longer, and better for traditional pickling in brine. He also
wrote that Karaimes and Tartars living in the surroundings of Vilnius grew them for sale
in Vilnius [39]. As mentioned by Krywko in 1926 ‘Trakai’ cucumber (locally called also
Karaimes’ cucumber) was listed in the Welter’s seed catalog [38]. The variety was also
well-known and grown in central Poland from the 1930s to the 1970s until the time when
the first high-yield hybrid varieties characterized by non-yellowing fruits with white thorns
were introduced. Recovery of this landrace could be considered; however, it is monoecious
and susceptible to major diseases (unpublished data), thus it will require extensive disease
management and it will be low-yielding as compared to modern hybrids.
Tomato and Capsicum seeds were collected from small plastic or glass greenhouses
located in the backyards. In the Lithuanian climate, tomatoes and pepper are cultivated
only in conditions that are rather unfavorable (limited chemical protection, changes in
light intensity and temperature, accumulation of pathogens and fertilizers in the soil).
Local growers collect, for the next season, seeds from plants that are healthy and fruits
whose taste is preferred locally. Thus, collected accessions could be an interesting source of
resistance/tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Such germplasm could be useful to
study multiple stress resilience mechanism(s) to develop solanaceous varieties for organic
or low-input agriculture. Combined multiple stress tolerance is of great interest [40,41] and
there are efforts to achieve resilient tomatoes that keep unique flavor [42,43]. Therefore,
valorization of collected accessions with a focus on stress tolerance and description of
locally adapted flavor would be of great interest.
Collected accessions of garlic and onions could be characterized by early resistance/tolerance
to stresses and long storage overall high adaptability for Eastern European climatic conditions.
Growers used to collect the bulbs and dry them in simple conditions. Due to extensive global
garlic and Alliums exchange, more serious viral infections of those vegetables have been
observed recently [44–46]. Thus, it would be interesting to analyze bulb storage parameters of
the accessions and virus resistance of the accessions.
Whole bean plants with pods drying on the fences or under the eaves of outbuildings
were a frequent view in the Aukstaitija and Žemaitija Regions. A similar sight can still be
encountered in some regions of eastern and southern Poland [47]. Field beans are grown in
this region in a similar way as beans, to obtain dry seeds, and they are harvested in the
stage of green immature seeds for direct consumption only in a small percentage, unlike
in Poland or other regions in Europe, where field beans are mainly used in the form of
immature seeds. It is observed that field beans are used in a similar way as in Lithuania
in Central America, Egypt, Ethiopia, and China where dry field bean seeds constitute the
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 22 of 25
basic source of protein in the nutrition of people and form the basis of their everyday diet.
High protein content in seeds is one of the most important indicators of the nutritional
value of beans. Beans are good to excellent sources of protein, fibers, carbohydrates, and
micronutrients, which often are lacking in diets [48,49]. Human plant protein intake is on
the rise in many EU regions and the market for meat and dairy alternatives is undergoing
annual growth rates of 14% and 11% respectively. The characterization and maintenance
of food legume genetic resources and their exploitation in pre-breeding form the core
development of both more sustainable agriculture and healthier food products [50]. The
collected material can be a rich source for further exploitation.
It is puzzling that not a single accession of common pea (Pisum sativum L.), either field
(dry) pea or garden (vegetable) pea, was found (only as a field pea, but in the composition
of the feed mixture). Also, no cultivation of tomato was observed in open soil, which is
understandable, as the climatic conditions in northern Lithuania do not allow the growth
of such a stenothermal plant as a tomato.
According to Arlauskienė et al. [51], the highest concentration of cereals (up to 80%)
was found in the crop production farms of Central Lithuania (31–100 ha), but oats have
been grown on the least productive soils (in Western and Eastern Lithuania). In recent
years, organic farming oats have been grown all over Lithuania, while in western Lithuania,
because of adverse wintering or poor autumn conditions, farmers tend to choose spring
cereals instead of winter ones. During the collection missions, more cereals’ accessions
were collected in Eastern Lithuania (Žemaitija Region), but also in the southern and central
part of Lithuania (Dzūkija and Suvalkija Regions) due to the fact that the goal of these
expeditions was to collect local varieties, instead of new varieties which are grown mainly
in central Lithuania.
Cereals and legume mixtures for forage production are very popular in Lithuania.
The share of legumes in the mixture has a positive effect on the value of the site for
successive crops, and pea seeds, rich in protein, increase their fodder efficiency. In addition,
these mixtures are less susceptible to weed infestation and infestation by diseases and
pests, which makes them less demanding in relation to the expenditure on chemical plant
protection products [52]. The segetal plant species found in the collected accession cereals
are common in cereal intercrops in Lithuania [51]. No rare species of weed were found.
The observed oat landraces plants from both 2012 and 2013 experiments conducted
in Radzików were characterized by a large diversity of phenotypic traits. In the plots in
2012, low individuals were characterized by high TGW, whereas high individuals had low
TGW. In the experiment conducted in 2013, the landraces of oat plants were very variable.
The results of the observations do not allow to state the existence of any stable correlation
between characters of the observed collected accessions—it can be said that each of them is
individual. According to Kordulasińska and Bulińska-Radomska [53] and Pszczółkowski
and Sawicka [54], a large variety of traits opens the way for the selection of beneficial traits
for breeding. Varieties with the best morphological or agricultural traits (collected in 2011)
could be used in the breeding process to create genotypes with the desired traits [55].
Oat landraces have considerable potential for improving disease and abiotic stress
tolerance, and additionally, there are no obstacles to transfer the favorable characteristics
from the landraces to new varieties of crops. Oat landraces provide a wide spectrum of
starting materials for plant growth, as they make it possible to choose the characteristics
which are best suited to local needs. They are adapted to grow in the local environment
and local climate and immune to local diseases. Iannucci et al. [56] also emphasize that the
lack of strong links between the observed traits allows obtaining ‘useful combinations’ for
breeding. Besides that, a high level of variability in the analyzed indigenous oat landraces
increases their ability to compete with weeds. Therefore, it has to be concluded that oat
landraces should also be grown and conserved on farms. This, however, requires both
scientific expertise and traditional knowledge of farmers who should grow and manage
oat landraces in the place where they originated.
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 23 of 25
Collection missions are important sources of germplasm that can be used, among
others, in organic farming production and other sustainable agriculture programs, which
is necessary in the face of global climate changes and the need to ensure local and global
food security [28]. Genetic diversity is the key to maintain and improve agriculture.
6. Conclusions
The main purpose of collecting plant genetic material is to create collections that
represent the widest possible genetic diversity of the gene pool of a given population. Field
expeditions that took place in the area of Lithuania between 2011 and 2013 allowed us to
get acquainted with the abundance of this country in the remnants of old orchards, where
interesting fruit tree varieties, mainly apple trees grown at the turn of the 19th and 20th
centuries, can be found even today. During the expeditions, attention was paid to the
diversification of species and the age of trees. The geographical situation of Lithuania and
the relatively severe climate in this part of Europe definitely influence a low diversity of
fruit tree varieties and a limited number of such varieties. Despite the climatic conditions,
which are not favorable for growing fruit crops, a relatively big pool of very old fruit trees
was observed. There is no program for the preservation of old varieties of fruit trees in
Lithuania; therefore, there is also no awareness allowing to save them. For many apple tree
varieties, it was the last moment to save them by grafting. Poor health of trees was often an
obstacle in collecting material for multiplication. Field expeditions to Lithuania proved to
be appropriate and of great value, as they allowed to localize precious genetic resources,
such as many old apple tree varieties becoming extinct (the collected material will be used
for new planting and, thus, saving the diversity found there).
A part of the collected material can serve as a basic material for plant breeding, in
search of a better adaptation of these species to different soil and climatic conditions.
Germplasm collecting in Lithuania resulted in the preservation of many genetic plant
resources, representing a high genetic variability in the country, which are now safely
conserved and maintained for the benefit of present and future generations.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, D.F.D.; methodology, D.F.D., A.K., R.R.; formal analysis,
D.F.D., G.B., A.K., K.K.; investigation, D.F.D., A.K.; data curation, D.F.D., A.K., G.B., B.G.; writing—
original draft preparation, D.F.D., A.K., R.R.; writing—review and editing, D.F.D., G.B.; visualization,
D.F.D., G.B., K.K.; supervision, D.F.D.; funding acquisition, D.F.D., G.B. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by the Multi-annual program: “Establishment of a scientific
basis for biological progress and preservation of plant genetic resources as a source of innovation
in order to support sustainable agriculture and food security of the country” coordinated by Plant
Breeding and Acclimatization Institute—National Research Institute (PBAI-NRI) and financed by the
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Poland.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: We thank Wiesław Podyma, the head of the National Research Institute (PBAI-
NRI), who provided a factual review of the manuscript, and Valdemaras Degulis who performed the
duties of a guide, translator, and assistant during all three expeditions.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
References
1. Frison, E. After Vavilov: Collecting germplasm in the 21st century. In Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines. 2011
Update; Guarino, L., Ramanatha, R.V., Goldberg, E., Eds.; Bioversity International, published by CABI: Rome, Italy, 2011. Available
online: http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=390&Itemid=557 (accessed on 10
January 2021).
2. Tuinyla, V.; Lukoševičius, A.; Bandaravičius, A. Lietuvos Pomologija: Atlasas, t. I-V; Mokslas: Vilnius, Lithuania, 1990; p. 333.
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 24 of 25
3. Lazauskas, J. Augalininkystė Lietuvoje (1895–1995); Dotnuva Akademija: Akademija, Lithuania, 1998; p. 388.
4. Bobinas, Č. Lietuvos sodininkystės ir daržininkystės instituto mokslinė veikla 1938–2008. Sodininkystė Daržininkystė 2008, 27,
3–23.
5. Dabkevičius, Z.; Gelvonauskis, B.; Leistrumaitė, A. Investigation of genetic resources of cultivated plants in Lithuania. Biologija
2008, 54, 51–55. [CrossRef]
6. Davies, N. Europe: A History; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1996; p. 1365.
7. Bioversity International. The History of Biodiversity International Collecting Missions. Available online: https://www.
bioversityinternational.org/e-library/databases/collecting-missions/history/ (accessed on 12 May 2021).
8. FAO Country Profiles: Lithuania. Available online: http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index/en/?iso3=LTU (accessed on 10
February 2020).
9. Galvonaitė, A.; Valiukas, D.; Kilpys, J.; Kitrienė, Z.; Misiūnienė, M. Climate Atlas of Lithuania; Lithuanian Hydrometeorological
Service: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2013; p. 175.
10. Trading Economics. Available online: https://tradingeconomics.com/lithuania/agricultural-land-percent-of-land-area-wb-data.
html (accessed on 10 February 2020).
11. Juknevičiūtė, L.; Laurinavičius, A. Analysis and evaluation of depth of frozen ground affected by road climatic conditions. Balt. J.
Road Bridge Eng. 2008, 34, 226–232. [CrossRef]
12. Biesiada, R.; Lenczewski, T.; Ratajski, L.; Rychlowski, B. Słownik Geografii ZSSR; Wiedza Powszechna: Warszawa, Poland, 1974; p.
74. (In Polish)
13. Ochmański, J. Historia Litwy; Zakład Narodowy im; Ossolińskich: Wrocław, Poland, 1990; pp. 43–48. (In Polish)
14. Litva (Lietuva). Available online: http://litwa.probaltic.pl/ (accessed on 8 June 2021).
15. Skoniu˛ Kelias. Available online: http://www.skoniukelias.lt/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
16. Moss, H.; Guarino, L. Gathering and recording data in the field. In Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines; Guarino,
L., Ramanatha, R.V., Reid, R., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1995; pp. 367–417.
17. Alercia, A.; Diulgheroff, S.; Mackay, M. FAO/Bioversity Multi-Crop; Passport Descriptors, V. 2.1 (MCPD V. 2.1); Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy; Bioversity International: Rome, Italy, 2015.
18. FAO. Opinions and Advice of the Ad Hoc Technical Advisory Committee on the Multilateral System and the Standard Material Transfer
Agreement; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2015.
19. Kulpa, W. Nasionoznawstwo Chwastów; Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne: Warszawa, Poland, 1974; p. 413. (In Polish)
20. Kloc, G.; Dostatny, D.F.; Sekutowski, T.; Podyma, W. The role of collection missions in gathering plant genetic resources material.
Agron. Sci. 2018, 73, 135–147. [CrossRef]
21. FAO. Genebank Standards for Plant. Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014.
22. Valcárcel, J.V.; Peiró, R.M.; Pérez-de-Castro, A.; Díez, M.J. Morphological characterization of the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)
collection of the COMAV’s Genebank. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2018, 65, 1293–1306. [CrossRef]
23. Paris, H.S. A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 1986, 61, 133–138.
24. Minimum Descriptors for Cucurbita spp., Cucumber, Melon and Watermelon. ECPGR Secretariat, August. 2008. Available online:
https://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/fileadmin/templates/ecpgr.org/upload/NW_and_WG_UPLOADS/Cucurbits_DescriptorLists.
pdf (accessed on 26 February 2021).
25. IBPGR—International Board for Plant Genetic Resources; Oat Descriptors: Rome, Italy, 1985; p. 21.
26. COBORU—Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych. Lista Opisowa Odmian Roślin Rolniczych 2020; Wydawnictwo
COBORU: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2020; p. 11.
27. Kloc, G.; Dostatny, D.F. Przydatność dla hodowli miejscowych populacji owsa siewnego o szerokim zróżnicowaniu cech
fenotypowych zebranych na terenie Litwy. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Roślin 2020, 290, 5–8. [CrossRef]
28. Walter, B.M.T.; Cavalcanti, T.B.; Bianchetti, L.B.; Valls, J.F.M. Coleta de germoplasma vegetal: Relevância e conceitos básicos.
In Fundamentos Para a Coleta de Germoplasma Vegetal; Walter, B.M.T., Cavalcanti, T.B., Eds.; EMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e
Biotecnologia: Brasília, Brasil, 2005; pp. 27–56.
29. Rocha, F.; Gaspar, C.; Barata, A.M. The legacy of collecting missions to the valorisation of agro-biodiversity. Agric. For. 2017, 63,
25–38. [CrossRef]
30. Galluzzi, G.; Eyzaguirre, P.; Negri, V. Home gardens: Neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers.
Conserv. 2010, 19, 3635–3654. [CrossRef]
31. Hrebnicki, A. Atlas Owoców; Współczesny sadownik: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 1906.
32. Smardzewski, W. Atlas Owoców; part 2; manuscript in the possession of Polish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden in Warsaw;
Ogród Botaniczny PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1917.
33. Smardzewski, W. Atlas Owoców; part 3; manuscript in the possession of Polish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden in Warsaw;
Ogród Botaniczny PAN: Warsaw, Poland, 1932.
34. Rejman, A. Pomologia; PWRiL: Warszawa, Poland, 1975; pp. 45–59.
35. Korzeniewska, A.; Gałecka, T.; Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. Charakterystyka form dyni zwyczajnej (Cucurbita pepo L.) pod wzgl˛edem
cech owoców i nasion. In Proceedings of the Zasoby genowe roślin użytkowych na rzecz hodowli, Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, 6–8
September 2017; p. 73. (In Polish)
Agronomy 2021, 11, 1586 25 of 25
36. Camerini, G.; Manelli, E.; Masanta, M. Storia del Recupero Della Varietà Zucca Berrettina di Lungavilla (Pv)—History of a Recovery
Project: Lungavilla’s Pumpkin Landrace; Assoc. Zucca Berrettina: Lungavilla, Italy, 2014; Volume 6, p. 41.
37. Gediminas, A. The Karaim of Lithuania: A case of ethnic survival. J. Balt. Stud. 1997, 28, 235–246. [CrossRef]
38. Krywko, J. O Ogórku Trockim; Towarzystwo Wydawnicze Pogoń: Wilno, Lithuania, 1926; p. 26. (In Polish)
39. Strumiłło, J. Piel˛egnowanie poprawne ogórków gruntowych. In Strumiłło J. Ogrody Północne, Part III, 4th ed.; Ruben Rafałowicz
Ki˛egarnia Wileń: Wilno, Lithuania, 1844; pp. 69–76. (In Polish)
40. Bai, Y.; Kissoudis, C.; Yan, Z.; Visser, R.G.F.; van der Linden, G. Plant behaviour under combined stress: Tomato responses to
combined salinity and pathogen stress. Plant J. 2018, 93, 781–793. [CrossRef]
41. Arena, C.; Conti, S.; Francesca, S.; Melchionna, G.; Hájek, J.; Barták, M.; Barone, A.; Rigano, M.M. Eco-physiological screening
of different tomato genotypes in response to high temperatures: A combined field-to-laboratory approach. Plants 2020, 9, 508.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Massaretto, I.L.; Albaladejo, I.; Purgatto, E.; Flores, F.B.; Plasencia, F.; Egea-Fernández, J.M.; Bolarin, M.C.; Egea, I. Recovering
tomato landraces to simultaneously improve fruit yield and nutritional quality against salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1778.
[CrossRef]
43. Dwivedi, S.; Goldman, I.; Ortiz, R. Pursuing the potential of heirloom cultivars to improve adaptation, nutritional, and culinary
features of food crops. Agronomy 2019, 9, 441. [CrossRef]
44. Conci, V.C.; Canavelli, A.; Lunello, P.; Di Rienzo, J.; Nome, S.; Zumelzu, G.; Italia, R. Yield losses associated with virus-infected
garlic plants during five successive years. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 1411–1415. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Chodorska, M.; Paduch-Cichal, E.; Kalinowska, E.; Szyndel, M.S. Assessment of Allexiviruses infection in garlic plants in Poland.
Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2014, 13, 176–186.
46. Mansouri, F.; Krahulec, F.; Duchoslav, M.; Ryšánek, P. Newly identified host range of viruses infecting species of the genus Allium
and their distribution in six habitats in the Czech Republic. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 1496–1507. [CrossRef]
47. Dostatny, D.; Korzeniewska, A.; Hodun, G.; Hodun, M. Ekspedycje Krajowego Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych
przeprowadzone na terenie Polski w latach 2009–2011. Pol. J. Agron. 2014, 17, 3–10. (in Polish)
48. Egorova, G.; Perchuk, I.; Solovyeva, A.; Buravtseva, T. Sources of high protein content in common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris)
from the VIR collection. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breed. 2019, 180, 44–50. [CrossRef]
49. Winham, D.; Webb, D.; Barr, A. Beans and good health. Nutr. Today 2008, 5, 201–208. [CrossRef]
50. INCREASE. Intelligent Collections of Food Legumes Genetic Resources for European Agrofood Systems Project from the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 862862. 2020. Available
online: https://www.pulsesincrease.eu/it/about (accessed on 10 June 2021).
51. Arlauskienė, A.; Šarūnaitė, L.; Kadžiulienė, Ž.; Deveikytė, I.; Maikštėnienė, S. Suppression of annual weeds in pea and cereal
intercrops. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 1765–1774. [CrossRef]
52. Arlauskienė, A.Ž.K.; Deveikytė, I.; Šarūnaitė, L.; Semaškienė, R.; Karbauskienė, E.; Masilionytė, L.; Jablonskytė-Raščė, D.
Crop diversity and productivity under organic farming in Lithuania. In Proceedings of the Nordic View to Sustainable Rural
Development, the 25th NJF Congress, Riga, Latvia, 16–18 June 2015; pp. 85–90.
53. Kordulasińska, I.; Bulińska-Radomska, Z. Ocena cech morfologicznych, użytkowych i składu chemicznego obiektów owsa
zgromadzonych w Krajowym Centrum Roślinnych Zasobów Genowych w Radzikowie. Pol. J. Agron. 2014, 16, 3–12. (In Polish)
54. Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B. Zmienność form i odmian owsa w Polsce. Pol. J. Agron. 2016, 27, 106–117. (In Polish)
55. ˛ ecia i perspektywy hodowli owsa w Polsce. Biul. IHAR 2003, 229, 13–20. (In Polish)
Nita, Z.T. Współczesne osiagni˛
56. Iannucci, A.; Codianni, P.; Cattiveli, L. Evaluation of genotype diversity oat germplasm and definition of ideotypes adapted to
the Mediterranean Environment. Int. J. Agron. 2011, 8. [CrossRef]