Devovled Governments
Devovled Governments
Devovled Governments
Supremacy of the Constitution means that the devolution is no longer optional and
discretional. It is solidly established by the supreme law and everyone including state and
private entities must be bound by that reality. Further, the fact that devolution is buttressed by
the sovereign power of the people means that whatever governance aspirations and
commitments are done at both national and counties levels of governance shall be done on
behalf of and for the people. Indeed Article one of the constitution clearly stipulates that all
state organs exercise their powers as delegated by the Kenyan people. Kenyans have a choice
to exercise these powers either directly or indirectly through state organs – at both levels of
government.
It is also important to note that devolution in Kenya is also based on a public participation
constitutional principle. That is to say that although state organs at both levels of government
exercise delegated powers from the people, the same people do retain some residual powers
and constitutional rights to be engaged on all major decisions made on their behalf by those
elected or appointed into state offices.
investment decisions. In a devolved system, local governments have clear and legally
recognized geographical boundaries over which they exercise authority and within which
they perform public functions.
The devolved form of government in Kenya is very ambitious because it collapsed three
previous levels of administrations into one level. That is to say, the current counties resulted
from the collapse of former provincial administrations, local authorities and national
functions that were being done at the local levels
Devolution in Kenya would need to be seen in the context of Kenyans historical clamor for
equitable distribution of national resources. For a time, it was perceived that central
government had skewed arrangement where certain regions in Kenya did benefit more from
state resources and developmental programs. Further, devolution clamor was informed by
Kenya being a very diverse country with over forty two ethnic groups; diverse climatic
realities with northern Kenya being arid and semi arid and other areas being arable among
other political and economic realities (World Bank, 2012).
Actually, the strong provisions for devolution in the new Constitution were a key source of
public support for the draft of the Constitution. The World Bank (2012) has indicated that just
under 20 percent of supporters of the new Constitution did so because of the strong
provisions for devolution; this is the second most common response after a simple desire for
change, which measured at just over 20 percent.
The actual philosophy and reason behind Kenyans’ majority support for devolution can be
deduced from the constitution itself. A consideration of the objectives and principles of
devolution as clearly itemized in article 174 and 175 of the constitution would make these
aspirations of Kenyans more clearer.
1. The Constitution
The constitution is the main legal backbone of the entire devolution architecture. It outlines
the objectives and principles of devolution, the actual governance structures at this level, the
relationship between national and county governments, the functions that have been devolved
to counties among others. All other laws borrow and derive their authority from the
constitution.
The County Governments Act, 2012 stipulates the structure, functions and operations of the
county assembly including its membership, election and removal of the speaker as well as the
entire staffing arrangement of the assembly. The Act also provides for the entire arrangement
of the county executive including the appointment, and removal, procedures of county
executive committee members, chief officers, county secretaries and other senior staff at that
level. The law further provides for the powers and functions of the governor and his or her
deputy.
The law also provides, pursuant to Article 200 of the Constitution, for the manner of
nomination or appointment of persons to, and their removal from, offices in county
governments, including the qualifications of voters and candidates; the procedure of
assemblies and executive committees including the chairing and frequency of meetings,
quorums and voting; and the suspension of assemblies and executive committees.
It is important to note that this law came into effect immediately after the last general
election. It therefore follows that the law would need to be re-evaluated and possible
amendments included to make it more contextual and speak to prevailing realities. For
example, the law does not envision a desired complete dichotomy of staffing between the
county assembly and county executive at county level. Although the law provides for both
county assembly service board as well as county public service board to recruit and manage
staff, it does not completely give space for the two boards to conclusively deliver on their
mandate with absolute independence from the other.
Devolution in Kenya
Functions for both County and National governments are spelled out in the fourth schedule of
the constitution and the Transition Authority Gazette Notice 2013. The National Government
has a preserve of thirty four functions while the County Government preserves fourteen
functions as spelled out below;
coordination and administration of the national government functions both at national and
county levels. This law has not necessarily eased the tension between the national and county
governments. Indeed there has been a heated national discourse around the relationship
between the two levels of government. Obuya Bagaka (2010) in light of this tension has
said:-
‘The Provincial Administration will also need to re-orient its officials towards the broader
concept of devolution, and more specifically re-train them on the implications of the politics
of devolution. As laid out in the 2010 Constitution, Kenya’s politico-administrative system
will comprise the national and county governments headed by politicians. At the county
level, politicians such as governors will be accountable to their electorate and thus will not be
controlled by the central government.’ Moving forward, there will be need to re-evaluate the
relationship and inter-linkages between the national and county governments and how this
can be strengthened and systematized.
a) Auditor-General.
This office is provided for in the new constitution. The office has statutory objective and role
of ensuring that resources are used and applied for the good of the public. The office ensures
that there is value for money and its prudent use.
b) Controller of Budget.
This office is also provided for under the new constitution. Its constitutional objective and
role is broadly to ensure that there is prudent and legal formulation and implementation of
budgets by both national and county governments.
Conclusion
Devolved governments are new. The counties only came in place in 2013 after the general
elections. This means that these five years are likely to be bumpy and a lot more experiential.
However, the expectations of Kenyans on service delivery remains high. This is after having
largely a central government since independence in 1963.
It has been noted in this paper that many laws and arrangements put in place are still being
tried and tested. It follows therefore that these laws will need to be reviewed and possibly
updated based on real experiences on the ground moving forward. An opportune time to
evaluate and review the devolution laws and arrangement would possibly be after the lapse of
this electoral tenure, in 2017.
This paper has sought to outline the over-arching devolved government architecture and
processes. Other and further studies would need to be done to specifically deal with various
aspects of the devolved government in a more comprehensive manner.
References
Kenya Section of the International Commission of Jurists, 2013. Handbook of Devolution.
ICJ. Nairobi
World Bank (2012) Devolution Without Disruption; Pathways to a successful new Kenya.
World Bank. Nairobi
Roselyne Obala (2014) Insecurity dominates Uhuru, governors third Summit meeting.
Standard newspaper. Available at:http://www.sde.co.ke/pulse/article/2000144072/insecurity-
dominates-uhuru-governors-third-summit-meeting?pageNo=2
Jane Goin (2014) Senate usurping role of county assemblies, say MCAs. Available at:
http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2014/10/senate-usurping-role-of-county-assemblies-say-
mcas/
Obuya Bogaka (2009) Restructuring the Provincial Administration : An Insider’s View. SID.
Nairobi.
Republic of Kenya (2014) Laikipia County Public Participation Act. Government Printers.
Nairobi
Author: Hon. Patrick Mariru
Speaker: Laikipia County