Microfludics Channel Info
Microfludics Channel Info
Microfludics Channel Info
A top view is what is seen when the chip is looked from top!
Design Tips: The ports need to be properly distanced for access to tubing or connections.
The channels and the ports need to be in a safe distance from the chip edge. This is to
avoid sporadic leakage. Avoid overcrowding the chip with too many channels or wells.
This will facilitate de-molding, saving molds, and eventually saving money. Keep the chip
layout (blue line in the image) as a rectangle if possible. This would help with parts dicing or
cutting, and helps with parts unwanted warping.
Cross Section of the Microfluidic Channel
If the chip is sliced somewhere along the channel, then the cross section of the channel is
Design Tips: Avoid circular cross section. The microfluidic channels are made by
layering. This means to make a circular cross section, two semi-circular channels need to be
perfectly aligned on top of each other. Avoid semi circular cross section as much as
possible too. Most microfluidic molds are made using etching, lithography, electroplating,
CNC micromilling. It is very very difficult to obtain rounded cross sections. Avoid
trapezoids. In your microfluidic design if the cross section has a slope along the channel
width (varying depth), be worried. Larger channels with such trapezoidal cross section might
be built using CNC micromilling, but most microfluidic channel cannot be made with such
slanted bottoms. Best cross section: rectangle, or square. Avoid too wide
microfluidic channel or too narrow channels. A very wide channel in which the width is
much larger than the depth, would cause problems during bonding and sealing. In this case,
the channel top and bottom might collapse on each other, and close the channel. On the other
hand, a too narrow channel is created when the width is much smaller than the depth. Too
narrow microchannel design causes de-molding issues. This means the mold would get stuck
deep in the microfluidic channel and would either break upon ejection or damage the
microchannel. The best rectangular cross section for microfluidic channels’ manufacture is
a square. For example a 50um wide channel that is 50um deep!
Longitudinal profile relates to how the depth varies along the microfluidic channel.
Design Tips: Keep the depth along the channels constant as much as possible. If there
is a need to change the depth then do it stepwise. Less steps is better, and corresponds to
lower fabrication cost. Avoid ramps by all means, such as a 50um deep channel that
linearly becomes 100um at the end. Such profiles may be made using CNC machining, but
CNC machining is not a choice when thing get truly microfluidic!
Draft Angle relates to how vertical the microchannel walls are made for ease of fabrication.
Design Tips: A Positive draft angle helps the tooling come out of the part easily, which is
good (figure). A negative draft angle causes the tool to get stuck, jammed and cause
headache. Negative draft must be avoided in all type of casting parts, including injection
molding, laminating, or embossing of microfluidic channels. PDMS parts are elastomer
and tolerate zero draft molds, but thermoplastic casting process would suffer from it.
The simple answer is “yes”, but they need to be stacked from large width to narrow (from the
Design Tips: Overhung microfluidic channels or features must be avoided by all means.
Two factors directly affect the pressure in the microfluidic channels. 1) Flow rate. Fast flow
creates high pressure builds up at and around the inlet ports. It is a simple linear relationship;
meaning double the flow rate, get doubled pressure. 2) The geometry of microfluidic
channels. Longer channels create higher pressure. Similar to the flow rate effect, this is also
linear. This means if pressure at the inlet is 1 Bar for a 10mm channel, it will be more or less
about 2 Bars if the channel length is increased to 20mm. This statement assumes the flow rate
and the channel cross section is the same in both cases. The cross section of the channel also
affects the amount of pressure built up. Smaller cross section causes higher pressure. This
means pressure at the inlet port of a 100umx100um cross section channel is higher than a
200umx200um channel, for the same flow rates and channel length. Unfortunately the
relationship is not simple and linear. The relationship of pressure to the cross section depends
on things like boundary layer effect and other jargons, but uFluidix engineers have created an
online calculator to estimate the pressure for different fluid viscosity, flow rates, and channel
geometries.
There are several reasons, but the top two reasons are: 1) Bursting. Too much pressure built
up could cause the microfluidic channel to delaminate or fracture depending on how strong
the bonding is. It could also cause the tubing to pop, or connections to burst or leak. As a
general rule relative pressure in PDMs chips should be kept below 2Bars (200kPa, or 9 psi),
and under 3Bars (13.5 psi) as a Maximum of all Maximums. Thermoplastic chips could
take more pressure of up to 10 Bars in rare situations, but question would be if the
tubing/connection could hold! 2) Microparticles’ pressure tolerance. The second reason the
pressure is important in microfluidic channels is the safety and well being of the
micropartciles such as cell or droplets. One should always pay attention to how much
pressure is too much. For example if a tumor cell is supposed to be alive after trapping, what
is the maximum pressure allowed?
I Must Have Small Cross Section for my Device to Work, How Do I Avoid
High Pressure?
Design Tip. Often there are areas that must be small, such as flow focusing junctions,
filters, traps, etc. This doesn’t mean the whole channel network need to be small. Using a
two-layer mold is your answer. To illustrate, if a junction must be 10umx10um, the rest of
microchannel from inlet to just before the junction, and from after the junction to the outlet
could be made as a 100umx100um cross section. This could reduce the pressure at the inlet
few hundred times! A two layer mold is costlier than a single layer (constant depth) one, but
solves the problem.