Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

hw2 UM101

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

UM 101 : ANALYSIS & LINEAR ALGEBRA – I

“AUTUMN” 2020
HOMEWORK 2

Instructor: GAUTAM BHARALI Assigned: NOVEMBER 26, 2020

1. Let us consider a set A = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 } on which we define two operations + and × as


follows:
a + b := c, a × b := d, (1)
where c and d are obtained as follows:

c = the remainder obtained when dividing (a + b) by 8,


d = the remainder obtained when dividing ab by 8.

(The operations between the unbarred variables a and b above are the usual addition and multipli-
cation between natural numbers.) Is (A, +, ×) a field? Justifiy your answer.

The next three problems are devoted to showing that many statements that we take for granted
about R require proofs based on R being an ordered field. While R has just been introduced, these
problems will rely on the first thing to be presented on November 27: i.e., that Apostol’s
treatment of R is one where its existence and well-definedness are taking to axiomatic. Hence, the
Axioms 1–9 in Apostol, Sections I-3.2 and I-3.4 for R are the properties (1)–(9) — presented in
class — of ordered fields.
2. (a part of Apostol, I-3.5, Prob. 1) Using only the field axioms and the order axioms for R, prove
the following:
Theorem. Let a, b, c ∈ R. If a < b and c < 0, then ac > bc.

3. (Apostol, I-3.5, Prob. 2) Using only the field axioms and the order axioms for R, show that
there is no real number x such that x2 + 1 = 0.

4. Let a, b ∈ R and assume that a > b. Show that there exists a real rumber c such that b < c < a.
Note. You may freely use without proof any of Theorems I.17–I.25 in Apostol, Section I-3.4,
without proof.

You might also like