GF-WPK-J-CA-2001 - WP-K Calculation Note For Piping Stress Analysis - Rev 1 - R
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001 - WP-K Calculation Note For Piping Stress Analysis - Rev 1 - R
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001 - WP-K Calculation Note For Piping Stress Analysis - Rev 1 - R
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001 PAGE 1 OF 32
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS
OPERATIONS
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
The signing, countersigning or other endorsements of any drawings and documentation by PCIHBV’s Representative, agents or
employees shall neither be interpreted as implying the responsibility for the correctness and accuracy of such documents nor
relieving the CONTRACTOR of its obligations to review all information, data, drawings, and specifications provided by PCIHBV.
Class 1
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
REVISION HISTORY
Reviewed by:
Hafiz Md Sin
20th Nov 2020
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
2 DOCUMENT SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................... 5
3 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 6
4 DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 7
CHAPTER 1: PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 8
1 INPUTS........................................................................................................................................................... 9
2 STRESS SKETCH ....................................................................................................................................... 22
3 STRESS RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 22
4 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 23
5 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................. 23
CHAPTER 2: PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 25
1 DESIGN DATA............................................................................................................................................. 26
2 STRESS SKETCH ....................................................................................................................................... 29
3 STRESS RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 30
4 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 31
5 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................. 31
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
1 GENERAL
Garraf Development and Production Service Contract (DPSC) was signed on 18th January
2010 by South Oil Company of the Republic of Iraq (SOC) of one part and PETRONAS Carigali
Iraq Holding B.V, Japan Petroleum Exploration Company (JAPEX) and North Oil Company
(NOC) of the second part for the Garraf Contract Area which was subsequently made effective
on 10th February 2010.
Garraf field takes its name from the Shatt Al Garraf waterway, a tributary of the River Tigris. It
is one of a group of undeveloped fields sometimes referred to as the Garraf axis fields. The
others include Nasiriyah and Rafidain.
Garraf Contract Area (GCA) is located onshore in the province of Thi Qar, approximately 250
km southeast of Baghdad, 275km northwest of Basra and 85 km from Nasiriyah town. Garraf
is within Widyan Mesopotamia Basin which covers an area of 350 sq km.
Two (2) proven formation in Garraf are being considered for development, namely Mishrif and
Yamama. At the same time, there are opportunities available to appraise deeper Zubair and
Ratawi formations.
Garraf Oil Development are envisaged into several phases based on the full field development
production forecast of Mishrif formation.
The following picture depicts the wellpad and trunk lines network in all phases of development
from Mishrif formation.
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
The scope of work for this PROJECT will consist of the following main items:
Development of two (2) new wellpads, i.e. Wellpad G (2 Sectors) and Wellpad K (5
Sectors) complete with trunkline for each wellpad. Wellpad G trunkline to Wellpad B
while Wellpad K trunkline to Wellpad H;
Expansion of existing new sector (sector 1) in existing Wellpad C;
Execution of Well Tie-in works from wellhead to isolation valves upstream of MPFS
for existing Wellpad D (2 nos), Wellpad E (8 nos), Wellpad F (4 nos), Wellpad H (7
nos), and Wellpad J (3 nos).
Installation of three (3) units of new MPFM (free issue by PCIHBV) at existing
wellpad P, wellpad J and wellpad C.
2 DOCUMENT SCOPE
The purpose of this document is to show the calculations performed to check stress levels in
the pipeline/Piping according to ASME B31.4 and B31.3 Code.
Analysis has been performed according to:
Code: ASME B31.4 and ASME B31.3
Software used: CAESAR II Version 2018
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
3 REFERENCES
The following Codes and Standards, to the extent specified herein, form a part of this
specification. When an edition date is not indicated for a code or standard, the latest edition in
force at the time of VENDOR’s proposal submitted shall apply.
4.1 Definitions
For the purpose of this report, the following definitions shall be applying:
SUBCONTRACTOR/ : The party(s) which carries out all or part of the design,
procurement, installation and testing of the system(s) as
SUBVENDOR
specified by the EPCC CONTRACTOR
4.2 Abbreviations
1 INPUTS
The Piping calculations were performed based on the following design data.
Location
Site conditions and climate conditions are as per Doc no. GF-OGF4-G-RE-0502 - Design
Basis Memorandum (General).
The geotechnical data used for this calculation is based on the Doc. No. GF-OGF4-C-SP- 1001
- Geotechnical Investigations Report.
Earthquake load shall be calculated in accordance with IBC-2012, Section 1613. Site Class
for Seismic Design is Class D.
Earthquake acceleration factor U = 0.257 g’s
Direction Two main orthogonal axes in horizontal directions (±)
U1 U2
GX 0.257 0
GY 0 0
GZ 0 0.257
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
Class 091440XG
All nodes connection between wellheads and piping are displaced in vertical direction (+Y) as
imposed displacement D1, D2 and D3.
Support Loads
Combination
Compliance
Stress Type
B31.3 Code
Reference
method
Caesar II Description Load case
2 STRESS SKETCH
3 STRESS RESULTS
Allowable Stress
Load case Code Stress Ratio (%)
(N/mm2)
Hydrotest B31.3 241.3 38
Sustained 2 B31.3 137.9 77.6
Maximum Expansion B31.3 344.7 47.9
Maximum Occasional B31.3 183.4 44.9
All load cases are satisfied
Hydrotest = 91.8/241.3 = 38% -->OK
Sustained2 = 107/137.9 = 77.6% -->OK
Max Expansion = 165.3/ 344.7 = 47.95% -->OK
Max Occasional = 82.4/183.4 = 44.9% -->OK
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
1) CONTRACTOR to clarify whether applied load is based on design
DOC. NO.
pressure or operating pressure. GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
2) CONTRACTOR REVISION
to put remarks1 on 96% load factor whether it is
acceptable or not.
PAGE 23provide
If acceptable, to OF 32 basis of 96% acceptance
Maximum
Allowable NODE LOAD
Load case Applied Load
Load (kN) NUMBER FACTOR
(kN)
12”-900# Axial Direction 30 18 11040 0.6
12”-900# Transverse
10 4 14790 0.4
Direction
6”-900# Axial Direction 30 29 1760 0.96
6”-900# Transverse
10 2.2 22330 0.22
Direction
The restraint loads and displacements are acceptable. Refer Restraint summary for loadings
at each of the support locations, the support and supporting steel shall be designed for these
loads. The supporting steel near to the nozzle shall have negligible deflections.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The new pipe work satisfies the requirements of ASME B31.3 process piping code.
The loads and movements at supports are acceptable.
The terminal point loads are tabulated which are acceptable.
5 APPENDICES
Stress Summary
Report.pdf
Restraint Summary
Report.pdf
Displacement
Report.pdf
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
Flange Leakage
Check.pdf
Static Input
Listing.pdf
5.3 P&ID
Material
Specification for Piping and Valves.pdf
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
25 OF 32
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
26 OF 32
1 DESIGN DATA
The pipeline calculations were performed based on the following design data.
Location
Al Garraf Republic of Iraq
Site Conditions (Climatic Data)
Site conditions and climate conditions are as per Doc no. GF-OGF4-G-RE-0502 - Design
Basis Memorandum (General).
Geotechnical Data / Conditions
The geotechnical data used for this calculation is based on the Doc. No. GF-OGF4-C-SP- 1001
- Geotechnical Investigations Report.
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
27 OF 32
Earthquake load shall be calculated in accordance with IBC-2012, Section 1613. Site Class
for Seismic Design is Class D.
Earthquake acceleration factor U = 0.257 g’s
Direction Two main orthogonal axes in horizontal directions (±)
U1 U2
GX 0.257 0
GY 0 0
GZ 0 0.257
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
28 OF 32
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
29 OF 32
2 STRESS SKETCH
Detail 1
Detail 2
Detail 1
Detail 2
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
30 OF 32
3 STRESS RESULTS
Allowable Stress
Load case Code Stress Ratio (%)
(N/mm2)
Hydrotest B31.4 403.3 42.3
W+T1+P1 B31.4 403.3 47
1
Sustained B31.4 322.7 21.6
Maximum Operating B31.4 403.3 66.9
Maximum Expansion B31.4 403.3 42.2
Maximum Occasional B31.4 235.7 62.4
All load cases are satisfied
All stress ratio %
3.3 Loads on anchor flange are OK
According to Monolithic Isolating Joint Vendor data the external allowable loads in operating
Condition are listed in the following table:
Axial Load Shear Bending Torsion
(kN) (kN) (kN.m) (kN.m)
1240 248 570 93
The following loads on Monolithic Isolating Joint at WP-K side were calculated:
Axial Load Shear Bending Torsion
Node
(kN) (kN) (kN.m) (kN.m) 1
30030 99.3 6.6 98.4 5.2
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
31 OF 32
The following loads on Monolithic Isolating Joint at WP-H side were calculated:
Axial Load Shear Bending Torsion
Node
(kN) (kN) (kN.m) (kN.m)
1
31030 118 4.8 106.4 5.9
All External loads for Insulation joints are satisfied and are in the allowable limits.
Stress for MIJ for
3.5 Restraint load summary WPH --> OK
4 CONCLUSIONS
The new pipe work satisfies the requirements of ASME B31.4 Pipeline Transportation Systems
for Liquids and Slurries code.
The calculated stresses do not exceed allowable stresses stated by ASME B31.4 code.
The loads and movements of Pipeline are acceptable.
5 APPENDICES
Stress Summary
Report.pdf
Restraints Summary
Report.pdf
1
Displacemts
Report.pdf
Static Input
Listing.pdf
EPCC OF OIL GATHERING FACILITIES (PHASE 4)
GF-WPK-J-CA-2001
1
32 OF 32
1
STRESS ISO.pdf
5.3 P&ID
GF-WPK-B-14-4004-
1 Pig Launcher.pdf
Pipeline Material
Class.pdf
MIJ DSH.pdf