Welcome To The Webinar On FEMA P-749: Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts (Part B) !

2/15/2023
Welcome to the Webinar on FEMA P-749

Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts (Part B)!
Instructor. Ronald O. Hamburger, P.E., S.E., is a

Consulting Principal at Simpson Gumpertz & Heger and
author of the FEMA P-749 report.
Handouts. Webinar handouts will be sent in the chat and are available at this link: tinyurl.com/2p8tpy3c
PDH Certificates. Participants who are both registered and in attendance today will receive a PDH
certificate by email within 4 weeks.
Q&A. Use the Q&A window at the bottom of your screen to pose questions. Some questions will be
answered live; others will be distributed by email within 4 weeks.
Recording. A link to the recording will be sent by email after the event.
1
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
An Introduction to Seismic-Resistant
Building Practices in the U.S.
Part B
Technical Criteria
FEMA P-749: Training Part B
2
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
 An introduction to the U.S. building regulation
process as it relates to seismic safety and
sustainability
 Audience
A. The General Public – including regulators,
emergency planners, lenders, developers and
others with an interest in earthquake risk and
safety
B. Design Professionals – including engineers,
architects, students and others who want a
detailed introduction into the design
requirements in current building codes
FEMA P-749: Training Part B 3
3
2/15/2023
Poll Question
 Which best describes your technical background

 Architecture or engineering student
 Practicing Architect
 Practicing Civil or Structural Engineer
 Other type of Engineer
4
2/15/2023
Poll Question
 Rate your experience level with seismic design

 I have not designed a structure for seismic
resistance
 I have some experience in seismic design
 I have extensive seismic design experience
5
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 6
Seismic Design Process
6
2/15/2023
Linear Elastic Response
F 2F m
x 2x
7
2/15/2023
Period of Vibration - T
x T
𝑚 𝑊
𝑇 2𝜋 2𝜋
𝑘 𝑘𝑔
8
2/15/2023
Linear SDOF Dynamic Response
9
2/15/2023
Damped Response
• Damping is a function of
• Materials of construction
• Level of response
• It is common to express the amount of damping present as a % of critical damping
• Critical damping is the amount of damping that will bring a displaced SDOF structure to rest
in one cycle (time T)
• Building codes use 5% damping as a reasonable average value for most structures
responding to design earthquakes
10
10
2/15/2023
Linear SDOF Response to Ground Shaking
m(ẍ(t) + ü(t)) + cẋ(t) + k(x)x(t) = 0
11
11
2/15/2023
Linear Response to Ground Shaking
1‐Second Structure 2‐Second Structure 4‐Second Structure
12
12
2/15/2023
Acceleration Response Spectrum
13
13
2/15/2023
Acceleration Response Spectrum

F
x
 Structure has a period of T = 2 seconds
 Entering the response spectrum plot find at T= 2 seconds, the spectral
acceleration (Sa) has a value of 0.2g
 Find the maximum force in the structure as 𝐹 𝑚𝑎 𝑊 ⁄𝑔 𝑆 0.2𝑊
 Find the maximum displacement as x=F/k, or 𝑆 𝑔
14
14
2/15/2023
Nonlinear Response
Linear Response Nonlinear Response
15
15
2/15/2023
Seismic Design Process
1. Determine the structure’s use (occupancy) and Risk Category

2. Based on the building site, determine the design ground shaking,
3. Determine the building’s Seismic Design Category, based on
ground shaking and Risk Category
4. Select an appropriate seismic force-resisting system
5. Design the seismic force resisting system, considering the effects
of structural irregularities, if present
6. Design the nonstructural components in the building
This presentation follows the design process as it is embedded in the

ASCE 7-22 standard, which will be referenced by IBC-2024
16
16
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 7
Determine Seismic Design Criteria
17
17
2/15/2023
1- Determine Building’s Use - Risk Categories

 ASCE 7-22 Table 1.5-1 defines
risk categories in a general
manner
 The building code provides
more specific definition of the
types of structures assigned to
each category.
 Here we focus primarily on the
ASCE 7 criteria, but also talk to
the IBC requirements
 Note that where adopted, the
IBC takes precedence over
ASCE 7
18
18
2/15/2023
Risk Category Performance Intent

I. Structures not usually used for human occupancy
(barns, greenhouses)
II. Ordinary occupancy structures <10% chance of collapse in MCER shaking
(stores, offices, homes, warehouses)
III. Structures with:
 Very large occupancies (high rise office buildings) <5% chance of collapse in MCER shaking
 Occupants with limited mobility (schools, nursing homes, prisons) limited potential for release of materials
 Contain potentially hazardous materials
IV. Structures:
 Essential to post earthquake response and recovery <2.5% chance of collapse in MCER shaking
remain functional following most earthquakes
 Contain highly hazardous materials
19
19
2/15/2023
2- Determine Design Ground Shaking
Smoothed, design spectra, specified by the building code are intended to

represent the response expected of many possible earthquakes, each of
which will have somewhat different motion
20
20
2/15/2023
Design Spectra
 The design response spectrum will be different for each site.

 The design spectrum is affected by:
 Regional seismicity
 Earthquake magnitudes
 Frequency of occurrence
 Soil type and depth
 Distance to the earthquake source (fault)
 Depth of source
 Mechanism of fault rupture
21
21
2/15/2023
Determining Design Response Spectrum

Chapter 11
1. Determine Site Class

 Detailed procedures of Chapter 20
 Default Site Class
2. Determine spectral response ordinates
 USGS Values (obtained from ASCE Hazards tool)
 Site-specific Study (Chapter 21)
3. Determine design spectral response
parameters (Chapter 11)
22
22
2/15/2023
Site Classification
23
23
2/15/2023
Example 𝒗𝒔 Calculation
ASCE 7 20.4-1
Stiff Clay
vs=600 ft/sec
40’
𝑣̅ ⁄
=1082 ft/sec
, ,
Dense Sand
20’
vs=1600 ft/sec
Rock
vs=3000 ft/sec
24
24
2/15/2023
Default Site Class
25
25
2/15/2023
Determine Spectral Response Ordinates
 Design spectral ordinates are

obtained from an online USGS
database.
 Access to this database is
available through the free
ASCE 7 Hazard Tool at
https://asce7hazardtool.online/
 Enter building address (or
coordinates), Site Class, Risk
Category
26
26
26
2/15/2023
Full Report Format
Summary Input Data Results
27
27
2/15/2023
Full Report Format
28
28
2/15/2023
Alternate - Seismic Maps – Chapter 22
2
𝑆 𝑆
3
2
𝑆 𝑆
3
29
29
2/15/2023
2-Period Response Spectrum
TL
30
30
2/15/2023
Actual v Default Site Class
Site Class C Default Site Class
0.5g
0.3g
31
31
2/15/2023
3- Determine Seismic Design Category
 ASCE 7 categorizes structures according to their seismic risk, that is

the consequences of their failure.
 There are 6 Seismic Design Categories ranging from A to F, with

SDC A being the least seismic risk (low occupancy, low hazard).
 The Seismic Design Category affects many aspects of the design
32
32
2/15/2023
Determining Seismic Design Category

ASCE 7 Section 11.6
33
33
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 8
Design the Structure
34
34
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 8
Design The Structure
35
35
2/15/2023
4 - Select Seismic Force Resisting System
 The available seismic force-resisting systems depend on:
 Seismic Design Category
 Structure Type
 Building Structure
 Non-building Structure
 Structure Height
36
36
2/15/2023
Structure Types
 Typically enclosed
Buildings  Intended for human occupancy
 Common structural systems
 Load bearing walls
 Braced frames
 Moment frames
 Dual systems
Design of buildings is governed by ASCE 7 Chapter 12
37
37
2/15/2023
Structure Type
Non-building structures with  May be enclosed, partially
structural systems like buildings enclosed or open
 Human occupancy is incidental
to its intended use
 Common structural systems
 Load bearing walls
 Braced frames
 Moment frames
 Dual systems
Design of building‐like structures is governed by ASCE 7 Chapters 12 and 15

38
38
2/15/2023
Structure Type
Non-building structure not like a  May be enclosed, partially
building enclosed or open
 Human occupancy, if it occurs,
is incidental to its intended use
 Does not have a building type
structural system
Design of non‐building not like buildings is governed by ASCE 7 Chapter 15

39
39
2/15/2023
Structural System Selection
 After the designer determines:

 Design ground motion for the site
 Type of structure
the designer chooses a structural system to use for the Seismic
Force Resisting System (SFRS).
 Structural systems are categorized by material and behavior.
40
40
2/15/2023
Structural System Selection: Buildings
 Buildings and structures classified as SDC A can use any structural

system.
 Buildings classified as SDC B-F must use one of the specific SFRS
or combinations of systems provided in Table 12.2-1 of the ASCE 7
standard.
41
41
2/15/2023

 ASCE 7 Table 12.2-1 restricts
structural systems that have
proven to exhibit poor behavior in
past earthquakes to SDC A and
possibly SDC B.
 In other SDCs the structural

system may be restricted based on
maximum heights or weights.
42
42
2/15/2023
Structural System Selection Nonbuilding Structures

Table 12.2‐1 Table 15.4‐1
 All three ASCE/SEI 7 tables
provide:
 System SDC and height limits
 Values for three design parameters:
 Response Modification Factor – R
 Overstrength factor - o
 Deflection amplification factor - Cd
Table 15.4‐2
43
43
2/15/2023
5- Design the seismic force-resisting system

considering irregularities, if present
 ASCE 7 requires that structures be provided with sufficient strength

to resist specified earthquake forces in combination with other loads.
 The specific combinations of seismic load with other loads, including

dead and live loads, that members of the structural system must be
proportioned to resist are specified in the ASCE 7, Chapter 2.
 The structure must be analyzed independently in each of two orthogonal
directions.
 For each direction, the fundamental period (T), seismic base shear force (V),
and individual story forces (Fi) may be different.
 In some cases, the structure is designed for response in both directions
simultaneously
 Irregular structures are designed for larger forces
44
44
2/15/2023
Required Strength - SDC A
 Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category A are required to

have adequate strength to resist three different types of specified
forces:
 Global system seismic forces
 Continuity forces, and
 Wall anchorage forces
45
45
2/15/2023
Required Strength - SDC A

 The SFRS is designed
by applying a static
lateral force, equal to 1
percent (0.01) of the
structure’s weight
at each level.
46
46
2/15/2023
Required Strength – SDC A

 Continuity forces apply
to those elements that
“tie” or interconnect a
small piece of a
structure.
 Continuity forces equal

to 5 percent (0.05) of the
weight of the smaller
portion of the structure.
47
47
2/15/2023
Determining the Lateral Seismic Design Force

SDC B, C, D, E and F
Four methods:
 Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) method ASCE 7-22 Section 12.8
 Simplified Method also available for some structures Section 12.14
 Modal Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) ASCE 7-27 Section 12.9.1
 Linear Response History Analysis (LRHA) ASCE 7-27 Section 12.9.2
 Non-linear Response History Analysis (NLRHA) ASCE 7-27 Chapter 16
48
48
2/15/2023
Required Strength
 The specified earthquake forces are typically lower than the forces
that the design level earthquake will cause in these structures.
 The magnitude of the specified forces and how they are determined
depends on:
 Seismic Design Category (Seismic Hazard)
 Type of Structure
 Type of Element within the Structure
49
49
2/15/2023
Seismic Design Categories B through F
 The procedures used to calculate seismic lateral forces in SDC B

through F are similar, although for SDC B and C the ELF analytical
procedure is commonly used. IN SDC D, E and F it is more common
to use modal response spectrum or response history analysis.
 Structures must be designed for the effects of lateral and vertical
seismic forces
 The magnitude of the lateral seismic forces is determined accounting
for the structure’s inelastic response.
50
50
2/15/2023
Vertical Response
 The forces due to vertical earthquake shaking are taken as a fraction
of the demands on individual elements due to dead load, D.
Ev  0.2S DS D
51
51
2/15/2023
Structural Design Coefficients for Lateral Forces
Sa(T)
 R, Cd and Ω0 are intended to
approximate the beneficial effects of
Linear elastic
F=Sa(T)W structure
nonlinear behavior and ductility
 R – Response Modification factor
Nonlinear
structure reduces the theoretical elastic
Ω 𝐹 𝑅
earthquake force to consider yielding
 Ω0 is an overstrength factor that
𝐹
𝑅 recognizes that peak strength is
larger than yield strength

𝛿  Cd is a factor used to determine drift,
𝛿
𝑅 𝐶  considering nonlinear behavior
𝑅
52
52
2/15/2023
Configuration and Regularity
 ASCE 7 attempts to encourage the design of structures with regular

configurations:
 Uniform distribution of mass
 Uniform distribution of strength
 Uniform distribution of stiffness
 Continuous structural systems
 Continuous load path
53
53
2/15/2023

 Some irregularities result in requirements to perform
a more detailed analysis to better account for the
effects on the distribution of forces and associated
deformations.
 Some irregularities result in portions of the structure

being required to have higher strength to counter the
irregularity effects.
54
54
2/15/2023
 Two basic categories of irregularity are identified in ASCE 7:

 Horizontal, associated with irregular distribution of seismic force resistance in
plan
 Vertical, which cause a significant change in performance from one story to
another
55
55
2/15/2023
Horizontal Irregularities
Torsional & Extreme Torsional Re‐entrant Corner
Diaphragm Discontinuity Out‐of‐plane Offset
FEMA P-749: Training Unit B 56
56
56
2/15/2023
Vertical Irregularities
Weak or soft story In‐plane Offset
57
57
2/15/2023
Determining Lateral Forces
 Force magnitudes depend on:

 Deflected shape of the structure
 Weight of structure
 Location within structure
58
58
2/15/2023
 The total lateral force or base shear, V, is:
V  C sW
where,
V  the total base shear
Cs  seismic base shear coeff.
W  Weight of Building
59
59
2/15/2023
 The value of Cs depends on:
 The fundamental period of the structure
 The Risk Category
 The structural system used
60
60
2/15/2023
 Cs equals the lesser of
S DS
Cs 
 or
R I 
S D1
Cs 
 
R I T
61
61
2/15/2023
 For structures with a fundamental period of vibration greater than TL
S D1T L
Cs 
 
R I T2
 However, for any structure
C s  0.44S DS I
62
62
2/15/2023
Determining Required Strength – Near Fault Sites
 In SDC E and F, where S1 ≥ 0.6g, the base shear coefficient has an

additional lower bound imposed (i.e., the minimum seismic loads are
increased).
S1
C s  0.5
min
 R I 
63
63
2/15/2023
Vertical Distribution of Loads
 The base shear is then distributed vertically to each level of the

structure using
w i hik
Fi  n
V
w
j 1
j
h k
j
k  1.0 for T  0.5 sec.

k  2.0 for T  2.5 sec.
Interpolate for 0.5  T  2.5sec.
64
64
2/15/2023
Stiffness and Stability
 Lateral deflections (drift) must be checked if the simplified analysis

procedure is not used.
 The drift checks are used to:

 Protect nonstructural components
 Assure stability
 Avoid pounding with neighboring structures
65
65
2/15/2023
 Story drift, that is the ratio the

lateral movement in a single
story to the story height is used
to evaluate stiffness
 The drift for the 3rd story is
δ3/h3
66
66
2/15/2023
 The allowable story drift depends on the structural system and Risk
Category.
 The check is a comparison of estimated inelastic deflections to

allowable deflections:
Cd  i
   a hi
I
67
67
2/15/2023
 A calculation is required to evaluate stability

Px 

V x hx C d
 If this exceeds 0.1, then a P-Δ analysis must be included
0.5
 max   0.25
C d
68
68
2/15/2023
Strength Considerations – SDC D, E and F
 Strength considerations in these SDCs must include a check on

redundancy.
 Redundancy is considered sufficient if removal of any one element in

the SFRS does not:
 Reduce the lateral strength by more than 1/3
 Create an extreme torsional irregularity
 If the structure does not meet these redundancy requirements, its

strength must be increased by 30 percent.
69
69
2/15/2023
 Once member sizes are confirmed adequate for strength and drift,
the structure must be configured and detailed to meet the specific
requirements of the associated material design standard
 ACI 318 - concrete
 AISC 341 - steel
 TMS 402 - masonry
 NDS - wood
 Chapter 14 of ASCE 7 adds some requirements to these standards,
however, the IBC does not adopt chapter 14
70
70
2/15/2023
Final Step – Detail the Structure
71
71
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 9
Anchor and Brace the Nonstructural
Components
72
72
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749
Part B Chapter 9
Anchor and Brace the Nonstructural
Components
73
73
2/15/2023
Nonstructural Components and Systems
 In SDCs C, D, E and F, the attachment of nonstructural components must

be designed for the seismic forces per ASCE 7 Chapter 13.
 Exceptions:
 Mechanical and electrical components in SDC C (except those assigned Ip = 1.5)
 Mechanical and electrical components in SDCs D, E or F mounted at floor level, Ip =
1.0, weigh < 400 lbs., and connected with flexible connections.
 Mechanical and electrical components in SDCs D, E or F, Ip = 1.0, mounted > 4 feet
above the floor, weigh <20 pounds, and connected with flexible connections
 Component Importance Factor (Ip) must be determined:

 Ip =1 except:
 Ip=1.5 when:
 Required for Life Safety (e.g., Fire Suppression)
 Containment of Hazardous Materials
 Essential to Risk Category IV function
74
74
2/15/2023
 Components not exempt must be anchored to resist the seismic

forces and withstand displacements without failing and endangering
life-safety.
 Strength of attachments is determined as
𝐻 𝐶
0.3𝑆 𝐼 𝑊 0.4𝑆 𝐼 𝑊 1.6𝑆 𝐼 𝑊
𝑅 𝑅
75
75
2/15/2023
Lateral Design Force
𝐻 𝐶
0.4𝑆 𝐼 𝑊
𝑅 𝑅
76
76
2/15/2023
 Designated seismic systems (Components with I=1.5) must be

certified by their manufacturers to have been tested or have survived
previous earthquakes with acceptable performance
77
77
2/15/2023
FEMA P-749, Chapter 10: Special Topics
 Performance-based Design
 Design for Tsunami
 Soil-Structure Interaction
 Protective Systems
 Seismic Isolation
 Energy Dissipation
 Nonbuilding Structures
78
78
2/15/2023
Poll Question
 How do you feel about seismic design criteria

now?
 It looks really complex and I am not sure if I can do
it
 I understand what this is about now and think I can
do it better
 I still have lots of questions
79
79

Welcome To The Webinar On FEMA P-749: Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts (Part B) !

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Welcome To The Webinar On FEMA P-749: Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts (Part B) !

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Welcome To The Webinar On FEMA P-749: Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts (Part B) !

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2/15/2023

Welcome to the Webinar on FEMA P-749

Instructor. Ronald O. Hamburger, P.E., S.E., is a

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 3

 Which best describes your technical background

 Rate your experience level with seismic design

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

Linear Elastic Response

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 7

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 8

Linear SDOF Dynamic Response

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 9

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 10

Linear SDOF Response to Ground Shaking

m(ẍ(t) + ü(t)) + cẋ(t) + k(x)x(t) = 0

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 11

Linear Response to Ground Shaking

1‐Second Structure 2‐Second Structure 4‐Second Structure

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 12

Acceleration Response Spectrum

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

Acceleration Response Spectrum

Linear Response Nonlinear Response

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 15

Seismic Design Process

1. Determine the structure’s use (occupancy) and Risk Category

This presentation follows the design process as it is embedded in the

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

1- Determine Building’s Use - Risk Categories

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 18

Risk Category Performance Intent

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 19

2- Determine Design Ground Shaking

Smoothed, design spectra, specified by the building code are intended to

 The design response spectrum will be different for each site.

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

Determining Design Response Spectrum

1. Determine Site Class

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 22

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 23

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 24

Default Site Class

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 25

Determine Spectral Response Ordinates

 Design spectral ordinates are

Full Report Format

Summary Input Data Results

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 27

Full Report Format

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 28

Alternate - Seismic Maps – Chapter 22

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 29

2-Period Response Spectrum

FEMA P-749: Training Part B

Actual v Default Site Class

Site Class C Default Site Class

FEMA P-749: Training Part B 31

3- Determine Seismic Design Category