@

Numerous companies throughout the world have adopted "leadership" as an area of study as a result of
its significance for greater improvements. However, the fact that there are countless definitions or
philosophies of leadership is not surprising. The numerous theories make an effort to explain the diverse
political, communal, and corporate leaders' various leadership philosophies. The leadership of Mahatma
Gandhi, who is widely regarded as a political leader in India's history, will be briefly examined in this
essay. To understand his leadership, Groan's conception of leadership as a career and Greenleaf's
servant leadership theories are applied.

When leadership is studied from a professional standpoint, it not only enables the leadership student to
have a thorough awareness of the different contextual variables in which leaders lead, but it also
imparts strong knowledge about the significance of a leader’s biographical experiences. The diverse
environmental systems and the individual’s unique life experiences basically nurture the leaders. The
four stages of a leader’s life cycle—formation, accession, incumbency, and divestiture—are described by
the career model of leadership.

An Investigation examining the effects of green human resource management practices on universities’
organizational effectiveness was conducted in Kenya. The study used employee satisfaction,
organizational commitment from employees, environmental productivity and sustainability, and
employee loyalty to assess organizational success. Establishing the relationship between managing
employee performance and organizational effectiveness was the goal of this study. Role clarity and
employee performance reviews will be used in the study to gauge performance management methods,
while customer happiness and corporate image will gauge organizational effectiveness.

The theory of organizational effectiveness is based on the significance and preferences of evaluators,
and several definitions have emerged, such as: attaining goals and objectives, obtaining necessary
resources, fulfilling stakeholder expectations, using high-quality processes, recognizing simultaneous
oppositions, promoting flourishing, and adhering to moral and ethical principles. Each of these
definitions has a legitimate claim to being a useful method for analyzing and achieving results that are
desirable, but having various criteria for measuring effectiveness

&

Organizations communicate with the public as open systems. They are made up of tools and other kinds
of workers who collaborate to accomplish predetermined goals. Mentoring is one means through which
employees of organizations are led, instructed, and given information with which to carry out assigned
job tasks.

&
There are various forms of mentoring. It can take the shape of a direct one-on-one contact or
interaction sometimes, or it can be an organization-wide idea or practice. We have all either been
mentors or been mentored; mentoring is nothing new. We may apply mentoring connections and their
beneficial benefits to our professional lives. It is a sort of interpersonal interaction that is utilized to
support an employee’s career development, competence acquisition, character development, and
decision-making. Using the knowledge and experience of more seasoned workers as resources for those
new to the firm or less experienced in certain areas within the organization, mentoring in the workplace
is a comprehensive business approach.

This study focuses on collective leadership, which is the premise that many people within a system lead,
aiding Networks and organizations in moving forward toward a common objective, moving away from
the well-known impacts of LDPs on individuals. The efficiency of an organization is said to be influenced
by the collective leadership capacity. This study examines how the leadership development
programmed (LDP) promoted collective leadership capacity to impact organizational level outcomes and
contribute to organizational effectiveness using a constructivist approach through in-depth interviews
with Executive leaders whose firms invested in an LDP for Employees. Constructivism takes into account
how humans create reality by making sense of their experiences and how they grow from them rather
than just being passive consumers. Members of the group make sense of what is going on around them
and use their experience.

To comprehend the emphasis of this study, it is vital to distinguish between leadership development and
leadership. Leadership development focuses on the collective growth of an organization’s entire leader
population as a unit, as opposed to leader development, which stresses improving the abilities and
competencies of specific individuals. To build inclusive social capital ethically and equitably, leaders can
come together to jointly generate positive actions across an organization. This is known as collective
leadership capacity. Enhancing leadership development is believed to create and mobilize human and
social capital to aid in an organization’s systemic growth. According to meta-analyses of LDPs, there isn’t
much emphasis on connecting the leadership development process to specific organizational goals and
performance. In light of recent global shifts and quick adjustments, collective leadership development.

In organizations, managers and leaders play a range of functions. Managers oversee and maintain
institutions while leaders work to reform them. At different times and points in their lives, organizations
have varying requirements for these positions. Leaders need to manage creativity and change in order
for their organizations to succeed. To ensure that followers are motivated and understand their mission,
leaders employ a range of strategies. These strategies range from covert use of authority to subtle
persuasion. To help workers accomplish company goals, they also rearrange the workplace, such as by
allocating finances and changing communication styles.

Traits, conduct, authority, communication styles, work, interpersonal relationships, and occupation in an
administrative function have all been used to characterize leadership. Leadership is the capacity to
inspire, empower, and encourage others to make a positive difference in the success and development
of the organizations they are a part of. A power process involving two or more people is what is known
as leadership. They demonstrate that the target of the impact campaign must ascribe and identify it as
coming from a particular individual. Some writers have made an effort to define leadership as a whole.
For instance, leadership can be defined as the qualities of a leader’s influencing process and how it
affects others, as well as how these influencing processes are reflected in the follower’s expectations
and attributions and the context in which they occur.

The connection between servant leadership and service innovation has been studied in the past.
According to research findings, servant leadership significantly improved service innovation.
Additionally, there is a strong and favorable link between servant leadership and corporate
competitiveness. The link between corporate sustainability and servant leadership. The findings
revealed a strong and constructive trend. Fernando’s research, however, revealed a negligible
Relationship. Examined the link between corporate competitiveness and service innovation. The study’s
findings indicated a significant and favorable link. Business transformation and corporate
competitiveness are related. The study discovered a strong and favorable association.

Servant leadership also has an impact on changes in corporate competitiveness. At PT ASDP Indonesia,
improving servant leadership boosts corporate competitiveness. The leaders at PT ASDP are dependable
and capable of competing in the industry. Technology-based Competition strategy is the main emphasis
of globalization Era strategy development. Leaders of the PT ASDP should be receptive to shifting
business trends. The direction of the organization is decided by the leader. By addressing this obstacle,
PT ASDP may improve its servant leadership. Pressure from the competition motivates PT ASDP to boost
corporate competition to raise selling value. The amount of corporate competitiveness is thought to be
suitable for servant leadership. Leaders that can think strategically about long-term objectives and
marketing plans will be able to advance their organizations.

Following is a description of the findings:

1. Better service will result from more servant leadership Innovation.

2. PT ASDP's Business Transformation initiative has not been able to enhance Service Innovation.

3. PT ASDP's level of corporate sustainability and competitiveness will be impacted by improved servant
leadership.

4. Business Transformation has a significant and favorable impact on corporate sustainability and
competitiveness.

5. A key mediator for the link between servant leadership and corporate sustainability and corporate
competitiveness is service innovation.