6 Mo
6 Mo
6 Mo
1
TABLE 1
6 Mo Austenitic Stainless Steels and Other Austenitic Grades
UNS Common C!!~mic!!l Cgmpgsition {wt"/g}*
Number Name Producers Cr Ni Mo Cu N c
$31254 254 SMO<'> Avesta 19.50-20.50 17.5Q-18.50 6.00-6.50 0.50-1.00 0.18-0.22 0.020 max
J93254 Cast 254 SMo<' > Various licencees 19.50-20.50 17.50-18.50 6.00-6.50 0.50-1.00 0.18-0.22 0.020 max
CK-3MCuN
N08366 AL-6X<2 > Allegheny Ludlum 20.00-22.00 23.50-25.50 6.00-7.00 0.035 max
N08367 AL-6XN<2 > Allegheny Ludlum 20.00-22.00 23.50-25.50 6.00-7.00 0.75 max 0.18-.025 0.030 max
N08925 1925 hMo VDM Technologies 19.00-21.00 24.00-26.00 6.0-7.0 0.8-1.5 0.10-Q.20 0.020 max
25-6MO Inca Alloys International
N08026 20Mo-6<3 > Carpenter Technology 22.00-26.00 33.00-37.20 5.00-6.70 2.00-4.00 0.03 max
$30403 Type 304L Many 18.00-20.00 8.00-12.00 0.10 max 0.030 max
$31603 Type 316L Many 16.00-18.00 10.00-14.00 2.00-3.00 0.10 0.030 max
N08904 Alloy 904L Many 19.00-23.00 23.00-28.00 4.0-5.0 1.0-2.0 0.020 max
grades are all produced and marketed through densers for power plants. Since 1973, about 24 mil-
stainless steel manufacturers and distribution chan- lion ft (8 million m) of AL-6X condenser tubing has
nels. been placed in service.
254 SMO evolved from the standard austenitic AL-6XN,™ the nitrogen-enhanced version of
grades, .with the addition of nitrogen. Nitrogen is AL-6X, was introduced in 1984. AL-6XN has largely
economical because it decreases the need for nickel replaced AL-6X commercially. The addition of nitro-
to stabilize the austenitic structure. Nitrogen is es- gen allows AL-6XN to be produced over a full
sential to quality in the 6 Mo austenitics because it range of forms and sizes, with all of the benefits of
delays formation of the chromium-molybdenum nitrogen described above. The nickel content is re-
intermetallic sigma phase; provides higher strength; tained at its original high level and provides advan-
and, in particular, improves pitting resistance. The tages in some reducing acids. The high strength
precise control of composition needed for these originally attributed to AL-6XN is being revised to
grades, made possible by modern refining equip- somewhat lower values to reflect production experi-
ment, is demonstrated by the narrow ranges in the ence.
ASTM specifications. For 254 SMO, the producer The grade most commonly designated
has documented an optimal contribution to both 1925 hMo, and more recently offered as 25-6MO, is
sulfuric acid and chloride resistance by the particu- a modification of the lower-molybdenum sulfuric
lar level of copper addition. This grade has pulp acid grade, 904L. Neither 904L nor 1925 hMo-
bleach plant equipment installations dating from 25-6MO-are patented. The nitrogen and copper
1977 still in service for replacement of rapidly failed levels in their specifications are being modified to
type 317L and alloy 904L. In addition, several thou- levels com2arable to 254 SMO.
sand tons o£254 SMO have been used in critical 20Mo-6™ is a 6% molybdenum modification of
piping systems for the North Sea oil production alloy 20. It is significantly higher in chromium and
platforms. nickel than the other 6 Mo grades. Because of its
AL-6X™ evolved from a nickel-based alloy and higher nickel and copper contents, the resistance of
relies on nickel to stabilize the austenitic structure. 20Mo-6 in reducing acids would be expected to be
Without a nitrogen addition, AL-6X could be pro- superior.
duced only as light gage strip and tubing, with a
thickness maximum of about 0.065 in. (1.7 mm), Corrosion Resistance
because of its tendency to form sigma phase rap- The primary corrosion environments for the
idly. It has found wide use in seawater-cooled con- application of the 6 Mo austenitics are chlorides.
2 MP/December 1988
TABLE 2 TABLE 3
Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) for Some Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of the
6 Mo and Other Common Austenitic Stainless Steels 6 Mo Austenitics and Commori Stainless Steels
(P = Pass, F = Fail)
Critical Crevice Corrosion
Temperature in UNS Balling Balling
UNS 10% FeCI 3 ·H3 0 !pH 1) Number Grade 42% MgCI2 Wick Test 25% NaCI
Number Grade (F) (C)
Many operating engineers think of their chemical to remedy SCC problems. Service experience with
processing environments in terms of the major pro- 6 Mo austenitics confirms these test results. Thou-
cess reaction (or reactions). But for a stainless steel, sands of tons of 254 SMO, AL-6X, and now
more often it is correct to focus on minor constituents AL-6XN, are in service in pulp and paper bleach
and to think of the operating environment in terms plants, seawater applications, and process industry
of a strong chloride solution with varying tempera- equipment, and no sec has been reported after
ture and acidity. more than 10 years' exposure.
Table 2 shows the critical crevice temperature
(CCT) in 10% FeC13 6H2 0 (pH 1) for several of the Design and Fabrication
6 Mo austenitics and some of the more common
stainless steels. For a particular environment and The 6 Mo austenitics have strength levels about
crevice geometry, each stainless steel will have a 50% higher than those of type 316L. As shown in
critical temperature above which crevice corrosion Table 4, these higher strengths are reflected in the
initiates. Comparing the 6 Mo austenitics to some allowable design stresses in the ASME Code tables.
common austenitics, a dramatic improvement of These values have been confirmed by extensive sta-
corrosion resistance is noted by increasing molybde- tistical surveys for commercial production of
num and nitrogen. Among the 6 Mo grades, nitro- 254 SMO product forms over a full range of thick-
gen has a powerful effect, but nickel and copper nesses. The values for AL-6XN were originally
seem to have almost no effect. The ferric chloride based on experience with light gage product forms,
test is effective in ranking materials, but the CCT is and were overstated in the Code for heavier sec-
not necessarily predictive of results in other envi- tions; they are being revised downward. The values
ronments. shown for 1925 hMo/25-6MO are conservative; es-
The 6 Mo austenitics offer a practical engineer- pecially once the nitrogen level is formally
ing solution to chloride stress corrosion cracking increased to be comparable to the level of 254 SMO
(SCC) in sodium chloride environments. The sus- and AL-6XN. There appears to be no basis to sug-
ceptibility of type 316 to sec has many engineers gest that any particular 6 Mo grade has an advan-
concerned about the use of any austenitic stainless tage over the other grades in mechanical strength
steel in heat transfer situations in high-chloride en- properties.
vironments. As shown in Table 3, the 6 Mo austeni- Although of high strength, the 6 Mo austenitics
tics are not resistant to the standard laboratory test exhibit the excellent toughness and ductility charac-
in boiling 42% magnesium chloride, but this test is teristic of the 300 series austenitics. The design en-
far too severe to be representative of practical applications gineer upgrading from types 304/304L and 316/316L
involving environments containing sodium chloride. to the 6 Mo austenitic grades has the opportunity
The "Wick Test" and the boiling 25% sodium for construction economies by down-gaging. The
chloride test correlate well with field experience for 6 Mo austenitics are readily fabricated with stan-
both success and failure of austenitic grades in sec dard equipment once allowances are made for the
applications. All 6% Mo grades resist cracking indef- higher strength levels and the slightly higher
initely in sodium chloride tests. Alloy 20 and also springback.
alloy 2205, a duplex stainless steel, show similar If the 6 Mo austenitics need to be annealed or
laboratory test behavior and are used successfully stress relieved, they must be given a full anneal and
MP/December 1988 3
TABLE 4
Design Stress (ksi), ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1 for Plate< 1 >
UNS Temperature (F)
Number Grade 100 200 300 400 500 600 650 700 750 BOO
831254 254SMO 23.5 23.5 21.4 19.9 18.5 17.9 17.7 17.5 17.3
254 SM0<2 l 23.5 23.5 22.4 21.3 20.5 20.1 19.9 19.9 19.8
N08367 AL·6XN<2 l 26.0 24.3 22.7 20.9 19.9 19.3 19.3 18.7 18.4
N08925 1925 hMo 21.7 20.9 19.6 18.3 17.3 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9
25·6MO
N08026 20Mo-6 20.0 20.0 18.9 17.5 16.3 15.3 14.9 14.6 14.2 13.9
20Mo-6<2 J 20.0 20.0 19.6 19.2 18.5 18.1 17.8 17.5 17.3 17.0
530451 Type 304N 20.0 19.1 16.7 15.0 13.9 13.2 13.0 12.7 12.5 12.3
Type 304N<2 l 20.0 20.0 19.0 18.3 17.8 17.4 17.3 17.1 16.9 16.6
831603 Type 316L 16.7 14.1 12.7 11.7 10.9 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 9.6
Type 316L<2 l 16.7 16.7 16.0 15.6 14.8 14.0 13.8 13.5 13.2 13.0
N08904 Alloy 904L 17.8 16.7 15.1 13.8 12.7 12.0 11.7 11.4
water quench. Some disagreement exists among the Welding the 6 Mo austenitics is relatively sim-
producers whether 2050 F (1120 C) or 2150 F (1175 ple: use filler metals that are sufficiently overalloyed
C) is the minimum annealing temperature; the dif- with molybdenum that the weldsare more resistant
ferent positions all are based on sound technical to corrosion than the base metal. The filler metal
reasoning. The fabricator should follow the produ- most frequently used has been alloy 625 with 9%
cer's recommendations for annealing his grade with molybdenum, but some fabricators prefer alloy
special attention to ensure that the workpiece has C-276 or C-22. These filler metals are sufficiently
minimal temperature decrease from the annealing overalloyed to compensate for the lower resistance
temperature to the instant of water quench. Heat of the as-welded structure. Welds made with these
treatments that permit the 6 Mo austenitics to fillers can be used in the as-welded condition. In
spend time in the 1300 to 1900 F (705 to 1040 C) every case, it is essential that the welder follow
range risk extensive sigma phase formation with conscientious practices of cleanliness before and
loss of corrosion resistance and possibly toughness. after welding, and superior gas or slag shielding
during welding. The heat inputs and weldment
There are some important differences between sizes are restricted to avoid hot cracking of these
the 300 series stainless steels and the 6 Mo austeni- high-nickel filler metals.
tics in welding. Because of their high alloy con-
tents, the 6 Mo austenitics are particularly suscepti- Specifications and Availability
ble to molybdenum segregation during solidification Tables 5 and 6 list the available product forms,
of an autogenous weld, or a weld without filler applicable specifications, and common availability
metal. Although a few exceptions relate to high channels of the 6 Mo austenitics. Some producers
speed, automatic welding with low heat input and may argue that various product forms are "avail-
rapid quenching (for example, production of thin able," but the end user usually thinks of availability
wall condenser tubing), autogenous welding with- in terms of timely delivery of required product
out subsequent full annealing reduces the corrosion forms and quantities, not just production capability.
resistance of the 6 Mo austenitic grades. The fabri- Also, availability can change rapidly as producers
cator should never create an autogenous weld on and distributors are increasingly responsive to user
the 6 Mo austenitics unless prepared to perform a sub- needs.
sequent full anneal and quench. This prohibition ap- Since the 6 Mo grades appear both in stainless
plies to both primary welding and to any minor re- steel specifications and in nickel-based alloy
pair and patch welding. specifications the user should be careful to select
4
TABLE 5
6 Mo Austenitics Meet a Variety of
ASTM Specifications and ASME Codes
ASME
UNS Section VIII, Section Ill,
Grade ASTM
Number Divison 1 Divison 1
J93254 Cast254 SMO A351,A743,A744 Code Case 2036 Code Case N-440
CK-3MCuN
N08366 AL-6X 8675, 8676, 8688, Table UNF-23.3 Code Case N-304
8690, 8691
N08367 AL-6XN 8366, 8462, 8472, Table UNF-23.3 Code Case N-438
8564, 8675
8676, 8688, 8690, 8691
N08925 1925 hMo 8625, 8649, 8673, 8764, Table UNF-23.3<1 > Code Case N-453,
25-6MO 8677 N-454, N-455