EREGL DCF Model
EREGL DCF Model
EREGL DCF Model
STATEMENT
12/30/2019 12/30/2020 12/30/2021
7,243,107 7,315,515 5,716,945
-1,622,352 -3,119,368 -7,520,856
-3,568,048 -1,743,044 -3,425,756
10,577,931 13,510,993 23,109,359
-1,422,829 -2,144,742 -3,862,055
7,219,324 6,292,079 9,162,437
-5,908,300 -7,367,260 -5,949,348
5,820,278 5,170,773 1,854,890
Equity/Asset 86.81% 10-year government bond rate 25%
Debt/Asset 13.19% Turkey CDS 7%
Risk-free rate 18%
NWC
Change in NWC -2,518,054 2,911,593 2,237,389 -14,453,489
WACC
Discount factor
Discount period
Terminal growth rate
NPV of FCF
Terminal value
NPV of terminal value
2. Gross margin, EBIT margin, and EBITDA margin for coming years is estimated by taking the average of the world
account. Margins are rather conservative.
3. CAPEX for coming years is estimated by setting a benchmark for the CAPEX/Sales, which seems steady over the
4. Change in the NWC for coming years is estimated by taking the weighted average of the historical data since ther
have taken into account very seriously.
et expectations. These market expectations include the investment reports of Citi, Info Research, Finbox, etc.
g the average of the worldwide steel industry (as your feedback suggested), historical data, and also taking the market expecta
ch seems steady over the past years. The benchmark is rather conservative.
e historical data since there is one year that could be considered as an outlier. Estimations are parallel with the market expectat
ox, etc.