TuCoop v. 3G Green Gold Group Complaint
TuCoop v. 3G Green Gold Group Complaint
TuCoop v. 3G Green Gold Group Complaint
COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y
CREDITO TUCOOP
CIVIL NO:
Plaintiff,
v. DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT
the undersigned attorneys, and very respectfully Allege and Pray as follows:
I. JURISDICTION
regarding the infringement of federal laws and regulations when a Marijuana Related Business
(“MRB”) located in Puerto Rico disguises its commercial and financial activity as non-MRB
transactions in order to funnel marijuana proceeds through the interstate commerce and deposit
such proceeds in a bank account in Colorado belonging to a corporation whose owners have issued
2. This Court has original jurisdiction to entertain this case as it is a civil action arising
3. Venue lies properly in this Court as all defendants reside in this District and the
events giving rise to this action occurred in the District of Puerto Rico, 28 U.S.C. §1391(b).
Case 3:23-cv-01301-RAM Document 1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 6
2–
it is subject to full compliance with the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970,
also referred to as the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), 12 U.S.C §1951; the provisions in Title III of
the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001; and with the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. Additionally,
as a financial institution, TuCoop is subject to the mandatory regulations and guidelines issued by
its federal regulator, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), a bureau that
operates under the U.S. Department of the Treasury, as well as all guidance issued by the Federal
5. TuCoop is also a Puerto Rico chartered credit union pursuant to the Savings and
Credit Unions Associations Act of Puerto Rico, Act No. 255 of October 28, 2002, as amended, 7
6. 3G Green Gold Group LLC (“3G”), is a limited liability company organized under
the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. It participates in the MRB in Puerto Rico through
III. FACTS
7. Marijuana is an illegal Schedule I drug under the federal Controlled Substance Act
the MRB can form the basis for prosecution under money laundering statutes (18 U.S.C. §§1956
and 1957), the unlicensed money transmitter statute (18 U.S.C. §1960), and the BSA. Sections
1956 and 1957 of Title 18 make it a criminal offense to engage in certain financial and monetary
Case 3:23-cv-01301-RAM Document 1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 6
3–
transactions with the proceeds of certain “specified unlawful activity”, including proceeds from
marijuana-related violations of the CSA, regardless of whether the sale of marijuana is authorized
9. In Puerto Rico, the use of medicinal cannabis has been authorized pursuant to the
Puerto Rico Act to Regulate the Medicinal Cannabis Industry, Act 42 of July 9, 2017, 24 L.P.R.A.
§2621 et seq.
10. Pursuant to Article 18 (d)and (e) of said Act, TuCoop is allowed to provide financial
11. As such, 3G is a client of TuCoop, with an account for the deposit, withdrawal, and
12. Even if TuCoop may provide financial services to 3G pursuant to State law, Article
18(a) of the Act clearly states that “This Act forbids and seeks to establish controls to eliminate
money laundering. It shall be obligatory to comply with the guidelines by the Federal
Government that require clear controls for cash transactions to prevent money laundering”.
13. As the bureau responsible for enforcing the BSA, on February 14, 2014 FinCEN
14. Pursuant to such Guidance, in assessing the risk of providing services to a MRB, a
financial institution like TuCoop should conduct customer due diligence, including ongoing
monitoring for suspicious activity. Some of the red flags identified by FinCEN include 1)
Individuals conducting transactions for the business appear to be acting on behalf of other,
4–
receiving cash deposits from locations outside the state in which the business operates, making or
receiving frequent or large interstate transfers, or otherwise transacting with persons or entities
15. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) serves the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico. The FRBNY has prohibited all financial institutions in Puerto Rico, including
TuCoop, to process through the Fedwire Funds Service (“Fedwire”) funds generated in any MRB.
For that reason, in order to gain access to the Fedwire, financial institutions in Puerto Rico are
required to certify that they will “not use FRBNY accounts or services to process transactions that
16. The Fedwire is the premier electronic funds-transfer service on which banks,
17. TuCoop became aware that 3G created, implemented, and is operating by itself or
with the help of third parties, a scheme to evade the prohibition of the FRBNY and utilize the
Fedwire to transfer marijuana proceeds to the State of Colorado and other jurisdictions. Such
scheme entails disguising purchases of medical marijuana in BWell dispensaries as ordinary non-
MRB commercial transactions, so the impacted financial institution in Puerto Rico cannot
recognize the real source and/or purpose of the payment (a purchase of marijuana) and approve
the transfer of the funds and/or the clearing of such transactions through their Fedwire account or
through their local correspondent banks which maintain Fedwire accounts. See, sales receipts,
Exhibit 1.
18. Upon approval of the disguised transaction, the MRB funds are sent to the account
of a business with a Florida address and then, transferred again and deposited in a Colorado bank.
The owner of the account in Colorado is a Swedish limited liability company that operates a trust
for the benefit of a corporation operating in Nevis. See, flow chart, Exhibit 2.
Case 3:23-cv-01301-RAM Document 1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 5 of 6
5–
19. FinCEN has clearly identified that kind of conduct as red flags that should alert to
possible illegal activity. It also serves as basis for the termination of the relationship between the
to process its masked MRB payments out of the jurisdiction of Puerto Rico, but 3G could not
21. Disregarding applicable federal law, 3G has simply maintained that its actions
comply with the Puerto Rico Act to Regulate the Medicinal Cannabis Industry, Act 42 of July 9,
2017, 24 L.P.R.A. §2626. It has also alerted that the closing of its bank account by TuCoop would
constitute an “undue interference with interstate commerce” and/or that it could be considered a
22. Because 3G has failed to explain its payment scheme through the FRBNY Fedwire,
TuCoop believes 3G’s payment scheme qualifies as suspicious activity, as per the red flags in
FinCENS’ guidance and that it may be covering illegal activity pursuant to the CSA, BSA and
other federal laws. Accordingly, TuCoop asserts that it is entitled to terminate its relationship with
3G and close its bank accounts at TuCoop. Failure to do so may expose TuCoop to fines and
sanctions by FinCen.
24. The scheme devised by 3G for the transferring of marijuana proceeds out of Puerto
Rico through the interstate commerce using third parties and masking the real source of the
financial transaction is illegal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§1956 and 1957, inasmuch as it attempts to
circumvent the BSA and FinCEN’s guidance, and the legal requirements of the FRNY.
Case 3:23-cv-01301-RAM Document 1 Filed 06/07/23 Page 6 of 6
6–
25. Because 3G’s payment scheme utilizing the Fedwire to transfer funds from the
MRB out of Puerto Rico presents a “red flag” under FinCen’s guidance, TuCoop maintains that it
has all legal authority to close Defendant’s account. 3G has contested TuCoop’s authority to do so
26. In view of the above, it is respectfully requested from the Court to declare that,
based on the applicable Federal laws and regulations, TuCoop is entitled to close 3G’s accounts
WHEREFORE TuCoop requests the Court to declare that TuCoop may terminate its
relationship with 3G and close its accounts in the institution based on suspicious and/or illegal