11 IV April 2023

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.50603
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

Comparative Analysis of Composite Structure by

STADD Pro Software
Divya Prakash1, Dr. Praveen Kumar Singhai2, Abhay Kumar JHA3, Barun Kumar4
1, 2, 3, 4
Department of Civil Engineering, Lakshmi Narain College of Technology, Bhopal M.P

Abstract: In comparison to many other emerging nations, India uses a fairly little amount of steel in the construction industry.
Other nations' experiences suggest that this isn't because steel isn't economically viable as a building material. Maximum Axial
Forces On Column Base Of The Structure Column RCC Structure (kN),steel Structure (kN) ,Difference in Foundation Size and
Reinforcement Requirements Property RCC Structure, Steel Structure Size:- are found by staad pro software. .With the existing
development requirements in India, there is a tremendous opportunity for raising the volume of steel in teaching. A significant
loss for the nation results from not utilising steel where it is cost-effective as an alternative construction material. Also, it is clear
that modern composite sections made of steel and concrete are a time, money, and cost-effective alternative for important civil
structures like bridges and tall skyscrapers.
Keywords: G+4, Composite Structure, Zone-IV, Cost Effective, Storey Drift, Base Shear.
.
I. INTRODUCTION
A composite member is a rolled or built-up structural steel shape that is filled with concrete, encased in reinforced concrete, or
physically linked to a slab of reinforced concrete. The use of composite members during construction ensures that the axial
compression and/or bending resistance of the concrete and structural steel shapes. When a concrete component, such as a floor slab
or a bridge, is linked to a steel component, such as an I-section beam, it creates a composite member that allows forces and moments
to be transferred between them. It is important to note that both materials are used as efficiently as feasible in this instance, resulting
in a construction that is advantageously both efficient and affordable. Thermal expansion (coefficient of thermal expansion) is
comparable for steel and concrete. As a result, there are no obvious thermal strains caused by the segment that is experiencing
temperature change. The total shear force at the interface between a concrete slab and steel beam is approximately eight times the
total load carried by the beam. Therefore, mechanical shear connectors are required at the steel-concrete interface. These connectors
are designed to (a) transmit longitudinal shear along the interface and, (b) prevent separation of steel beam and concrete slab at the
interface. THUS, mechanical shear connectors are provided to transmit the horizontal shear between the steel beam and the concrete
slab, ignoring the effect of any bond between the two. It also resistsuplift force acting at the steel interface. Commonly used types of
shear connectors as per IS: 11384 –1985: Code of practice for composite construction in structural steel and concrete.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Lallotra and Singha(2017) The purpose of this work is to conduct a thorough examination of the key characteristics of three
commonly used structural analysis and design software applications, STAAD Pro, SAP-2000, and ETABS. Each software package
has unique characteristics, options for analysis, options for the design and output, limits, and benefits. The user must take full
advantage of all a software program's positive features, but the programme shouldn't be used outside of its intended scope to prevent
a catastrophic failure. The key aspects of all of these software applications are therefore covered in this essay, with a focus on their
usefulness and potential drawbacks. This will provide a designer the confidence to select the necessary software in accordance with
a structure's specifications.
Limbare and Dode (2018) The phrase "composite materials" refers to an usable substance that is created by macroscopically
combining two or more easily identifiable components. The provisions of IS: 1893 part1)-2002 are taken into consideration for
earthquake loading in the current work while comparing RCC structures with steel concrete composite solutions for G+20 storey
buildings located in earthquake zone II. STAAD-PRO software is utilised for the design and analysis of the construction.
Comparing the data, it was discovered that composite structures were more cost-effective.
Sarath et al. (2020) This study's main goal is to design a building's relaxing around a single column. The development of
construction technologies and high-rise commercial structures is influenced by the population's rapid growth and the limited
availability of land. The structure is essential in enhancing a variety of activities. People move quickly from one place to another in

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 2274
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

today's world, mostly for financial gain.Our buildings are supported by a single column for aesthetic reasons, and the response of the
single column and floor to linear and dynamic loading is studied for deflection, bending moment, and shear force. Structural
planning and design is an art and science that focuses on creating structures with economy, elegance, and durability. The entire
process of structural planning and designing requires not only creative creativity and intellectual thinking, but also solid structural
engineering knowledge in addition to practical knowledge of elements like applicable design codes supported by real-world
examples. Standards are meant to ensure and improve safety while carefully balancing economy and safety.
Javaid and Verma (2021) The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of viscous dampers (VDs) and buckling restrained
braces (BRBs) in reducing seismic energy and enhancing seismic performance of irregular composite buildings during earthquake
events. Using ETABS software and the response spectrum method as per IS 1893:2016 for seismic zone V, the seismic response of
steel-concrete composite moment resisting frames of 15 stories with concrete filled steel tubes (CFST) as columns and composite
beams was assessed with and without seismic protection devices. The constructions had both conventional and atypical layouts. C-
and L-shaped buildings are among the irregularly shaped buildings in the plan. All of the structures have BRB and VD installations
in two arrangements: corner bays and centre bays throughout the height. The outcomes demonstrated the superior energy dissipation
capabilities of BRBs and VDs. Contributions from VDs were 5%–8% higher than those from BRBs, making them more effective.
For typical buildings, the most effective placement of VDs was in the centre bays, which reduced the time period by 60%, the
maximum story displacement by 57%, the base shear by 37%, and the maximum interstory drift ratio by 70%. Viscous dampers are
a great option for midrise composite buildings because corner bay placement of VDs was most effective for C and L-shaped
buildings, which reduced time-period by 55%–60%, maximum story displacement by 63%–65%, base shear by 30% and 13%, and
maximum interstory drift ratio by 78%–80%, respectively.
Singh and Singh (2022) The desire for tall structures with good aesthetic appeal and distinctive designs to set them apart from other
structures that result in irregularity in construction grows as a result of the modern, innovative world. It is well known that an
irregular structure is more prone to damage than a regular one, and that irregularity leads to structural instability. There are modern
methods to keep buildings stable and safe, such as shear walls, belt walls, dual systems, etc., because modern issues demand modern
answers. This study uses ETABS, outriggers, and belt truss to analyse various G+9 composite frame structure shapes. Dynamic and
static analyses both take seismic load into account (Response Spectrum method).they also considered the parameters like Story drift,
Story displacement, base shear of the different structures.

III. DATA FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FRAMED STRUCTURE

S. NO PARTICULARS DIMENSION/SIZE/VALUE

1. Model G+4
2. Seismic Zone Factor 0.24 (Zone IV)
3. Floor Height 3.2m
4. Depth Of Foundation 1.5m
5. Building Height 16m
6. Plan Size 12mx12m
7. Total Area 144 m2
8. Earthquake Load As per IS-1893-2002(2016)
9. Type Of Soil Type -II, Medium soil as per IS-1893(2016)
10. Ec 5000√fck N/ mm2(Ec is short term static modulus of elasticity in N/ mm2)
11. Fck 0.7√fc k N/ mm2(Fck is characteristic cube strength of concrete in N/ mm2
12. Live Load 2 kN/ m2 as per IS : 875 (Part II)-1987
13. Floor Finish 1.00kN/ m2
14. Specific Weight Of RCC 25.00 kN/ m2
15. Specific Weight Of Infill 20.00 kN/ m2

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 2275
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

16. Material Used Concrete M-30and Reinforcement Fe-415(HYSD Confirming to IS-1786)

17. Reinforcement Used High strength deformed steel Confirming to IS-786. It is having modulus of
Elasticity as 200 kN/ mm2

18. Static Analysis Equivalent static lateral force method

19. Software Used STAAD-Pro for static analysis, MS Excel For Excel Sheets
20. Specified Characteristics Compressive strength of 150mm cube at 28 days for M-30grade concrete-
30N/ mm2

21. Importance Factor 1

22. Fundamental Naural Time Ta = 0.075 h0.75 for moment resisting RC frame building without infill’s Ta = 0
Period Of Building .09 h/√d for all other building i/c moment resisting RC frame building with brick
infill walls Where h = height of building d = base dimension of building at plinth
level in m along the considered direction of
lateral forces.

Figure 1 Plan and Elevation of the Structure

IV. CONCLUSION
Based on the above study following conclusions can be made
1) Sufficient To comprehend how the composite elements behave, researchers have studied the literature on composite structures.
2) Design loads and exposure conditions are applied in accordance with IS Codes.
3) An analysis, design, and calculation of cost per unit quantities have been completed for a G+4 RCC structure with plan
dimensions of 12m x 12m.
4) Due to its inherent flexibility, steel structures perform better than traditional R.C.C. structures. An equivalent steel structure has
also been studied and developed with earthquake considerations.

V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was completed with the grants and facilities of Lakshmi Narain College of Technology, Bhopal (M.P.). Authors are
thankful to this institute and faculties for extending this cooperation.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 2276
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

REFERENCES
[1] Anamika Tedia ,Dr.Savita Maru ―Cost, Analysis and Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Structure RCC Structure‖ IOSR Journal of Mechanical and
Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) Jan. 2014.
[2] Anish N. Shah, Dr. P.S. Pajgade ―Comparision Of R.C.C. And Comosite Multistoried Buildings‖ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) April 2013.
[3] Balwinder Lallotra, Dhirendra Singhal (2017)State of the Art Report - A ComparativeStudy of Structural Analysis and Design Software - STAAD Pro, SAP-
2000 & ETABS Software, ISSN (Print) : 2319-8613 ISSN (Online) : 0975-4024 Balwinder Lallotra et al. / International Journal of Engineering and Technology
(IJET).
[4] Chintakrindi V. Kanaka Sarath, K. Ashok Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran, S. VigneshKannan, S. Pratheba, Study on analysis and design of a multi-storey building
with a single column using STAAD. Pro, Materials Today: Proceedings,Volume 33, Part 1,2020,Pages 728-731,ISSN 2214-
7853,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.073.
[5] Code of practice for design loads(Other than earthquake) For Building and Structures IS : 875 (Part 1 Dead Loads) 1987
[6] Code of practice for design loads(Other than earthquake) For Building and Structures IS : 875 (Part II Imposed Loads) 1987
[7] Code of practice for design loads(Other than earthquake) For Building and Structures IS : 875 (Part III Wind Loads) 1987
[8] Dan Dubinia “Seismic response of composite structures including actual behaviour of beam to column joints” Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV
© ASCE February 2006
[9] DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1110/1/012038.
[10] DOI:10.1061/40826(186)66
[11] Eiman Mirzaey, Md. Rumaan Shaikh, Muzamil Rasheed, Ayush Ughade, Hasim Ali Khan, Sayan Kumar Shaw, Shape memory alloy reinforcement for
strengthening of RCC structures—A critical review, Materials Today: Proceedings,2023,ISSN 2214-7853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.289.
[12] Eurocode 4 Design of composite steel and concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings BS EN 1994-1-1:2004
[13] Eurocode 4 of Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, CEN, 1994.
[14] Gaurav Swami, Huu-Tai Thai, Xuemei Liu,Structural robustness of composite modular buildings: The roles of CFST columns and inter-module
connections,Structures,Volume 48,2023,Pages 1491-1504,ISSN 2352-0124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.052.
[15] General Construction In Steel, Code Of Practice IS 800:2007
[16] Gurkirat Singh1 and S.K. Singh2Dynamic Analysis of Composite Structures with Outrigger System using Response Spectrum Method Published under licence
by IOP Publishing Ltd IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 1110, International Conference on Advance Earth Sciences &
Foundation Engineering 23/06/2022 - 24/06/2022 Mohali, India Citation Gurkirat Singh and S.K. Singh 2023 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1110 012038

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 2277