Combinepdf
Combinepdf
NUMBER OF EXPERIMENT: 7
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
Batch distillation has regained it interest from industries recent years. This is mainly
due to its flexibility and capability to produce high purity product. This interest has drawn
many researcher attentions to invent a fast and reliable model to serve the industry. To date,
several type of simulation model had been presented, and the interest to obtain a better control
and improvement on batch distillation has yet to stop. In this experiment, the problem is to
examine the change in top and bottom composition over time in batch distillation. The
compositions obtained from the experiment were determined using Refractive Index method.
HYPOTHESIS:
The experiment conduct the batch distillation at constant reflux to examine the change in top
and bottom composition.
OBJECTIVES:
● To operate a batch distillation unit at constant reflux
● To examine the change in top and bottom composition over time in batch distillation
● To measure the refractive index of samples using a refractometer
INTRODUCTION:
0 10 0 10 0 5.5494 1.333
1 9 0.789 9 1.7126 4.9945 1.338
2 8 1.578 8 3.4252 4.4395 1.342
3 7 2.367 7 5.1378 3.8846 1.349
4 6 3.156 6 6.8505 3.3296 1.350
5 5 3.945 5 8.5631 2.7747 1.353
6 4 4.734 4 10.276 2.2198 1.353
7 3 5.523 3 11.9883 1.6648 1.355
8 2 6.312 2 13.7009 1.1099 1.357
9 1 7.101 1 15.4135 0.5549 1.360
10 0 7.89 0 17.1261 0 1.361
𝒚 − 𝒚𝟏 𝒙 − 𝒙𝟏
=
𝒚𝟐 − 𝒚𝟏 𝒙𝟐 − 𝒙𝟏
0.9
0.8
0.7
Vapor mol fraction
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Xd Xb
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Liquid mol fraction
0.9
0.8
0.7
Vapor mol fraction
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 Xb Xd
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Liquid mol fraction
30 min Equilibrium Diagram for Ethanol-Water System at 1 atm
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Vapor mol fraction
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Xb Xd
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Liquid mol fraction
0.9
0.8
0.7
Vapor mol fraction
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Xb Xd
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Liquid mol fraction
40 min Equilibrium Diagram for Ethanol-Water System at 1 atm
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Vapor mol fraction
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Xb Xd
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Liquid mol fraction
Time 𝟏
Distillate composition , y Bottom composition, x
(min) 𝒚−𝒙
10 0.0696 0.0754 -172.4138
20 0.1284 0.0531 13.2802
30 0.1575 0.0350 8.1633
40 0.1627 0.0072 6.4309
50 0.1695 0.0072 6.1614
Graph 1: composition vs time
DISCUSSIONS
Batch distillation column can be operated with three reflux policies in order to meet certain
product specification. The reflux policies that can be employed to a batch distillation are either
constant reflux, regulating reflux or optimum reflux.
In this experiment, the aim was to studied constant reflux. For constant reflux, distillate purity
for lighter component will drop over time. In order to maintained the purity of distillate over
time, regulating reflux policy can be employed. Optimum reflux policy is used when maximum
profit from the operation is required; it is a tradeoff policy between constant reflux and
regulating reflux policies.
Batch distillation with constant reflux ratio can be done by using Rayleigh equation in
conjunction with McCabe-Thiele graphical method. Batch distillation under constant reflux
can be analyzed mathematically by considering that the mole lost from the still represent moles
of distillate collected. The purpose of measuring the refractive index is to determine the
composition of samples collected.
For the composition vs time graph, the composition were calculated by using
1
𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 − 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚
Throughout the experiment, some possible error can be identified. The refractive index
must be measured when the samples are completely cooled down. The position of eye should
be directly perpendicular to the scale of measuring cylinder. Record several temperature and
calculate the average temperature.
There are some precaution need to be aware before conduct the experiment. Wear a
safety glove when taking the samples out of the valves to avoid scalding. The distillate and the
bottom product can be hot as it is heated at 80 degree Celsius. It is advised be careful when
handling ethanol as it is highly flammable.
CONCLUSION
In constant reflux condition, the change in the overhead and bottom composition over
time in a batch distillation unit is determined. Theoretically, the mole fraction of ethanol in
both the distillate and bottom product decreases over time. As time elapse, the mole fraction of
ethanol in the evaporator decreases. At constant reflux, the amount of moles left in the
evaporator at any time can be determined. The objectives of this experiment are all achieved.
REFERENCES
1. Ms. Rafizah bt. Zaiton / Dr. Chung Ying Tao (2020). CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
LABORATORY 5 (EP212) LABORATORY MANUAL.
CLO / PLO Indicator Criteria Unacceptable Satisfactory Moderate Good Excellent Percentage Score
(0%) (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) (%)
CLO1/PLO2 Creates Problem No problem Problem Problem statement Problem Problem 5
problem statement statement and statement and and objective miss at statement and statement and
statement and objective objective objective are least one important objective are objective are
including stated irrelevant or not consideration listed, important fully addressed
approximations appropriate to experiment
and the experiment details are
assumptions covered, some
minor details
missing
CLO1/PLO2 Identifies Experimental No procedures Procedures do Procedures are Procedures are Procedure are 5
known and procedures are written in not properly listed, but missing listed in listed in clear
unknown the report. demonstrate information. Known complete, steps. Known
information, the steps taken and unknown known and and unknown
uncertainties in the information, unknown information,
and/or biases experiment. uncertainties and information, uncertainties
biases are not listed. uncertainties and biases are
and biases all listed.
some are not
listed. But some
minor details
are missing.
CLO1/PLO2 Evaluates Discussion/ Incomplete Incomplete / Some of the results Almost all of the Important 10
results Observation and incorrect incorrect have been correctly results have trends and data
interpretation interpretation of interpreted and been correctly comparisons
CLO3/PLO10 Writes Appearance Appearance Sections out of Sections in order; Lab report is Lab report is 10
documents and and formatting order, report is Formatting is rough mostly typed / typed / written
using formatting totally not typed / but readable. written using the in well
engineering inappropriate. written using Appropriate formatted, very
report the appropriate format, all readable.
standards format. sections in
order,
formatting
generally good
but could still be
improved.
CLO3/PLO10 Delivers clear Spelling, Grammar / Frequent Occasional grammar Less than 3 All grammar / 10
and organized grammar, spelling error, grammar and / / spelling errors, grammar / spelling are
formal sentence writing style is or spelling generally readable spelling errors, correct and
presentations structure rough and errors. with some rough mature, very well
with accurate immature. spots in writing style. readable style. written.
use of
technical
vocabulary
CLO5/PLO8 Demonstrates Timeliness Report handed Report handed Up to one day late Report handed Report handed 10
punctuality, in in more in time earlier than the
timeliness, more than than two days given time
responsibility three late
and days late.
appropriate
CLO5/PLO8 Comprehends Precaution No precaution One precaution Two precautions are Three Four or more 10
all the steps steps are is addressed on addressed on the precautions are precautions are
experiment addressed. the following: following: addressed on addressed on
according to 1. Safety 1. Safety the following: the following:
Standard 2. Experiment 2. Experiment SOP 1. Safety 1. Safety
Operating SOP 3. Experimental error 2. Experiment 2. Experiment
Procedures 3. Experimental SOP SOP
(SOP) error 3. Experimental 3. Experimental
error error
Total Mark
(out of 25 points)
[Type text]
Name of Assessor: ____________________ Date & Signature: ____________________