Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Borrow Pits - Rev 4 - 8 November 2013

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Road Building, Borrow Pits,

Construction Material, Quarries:

Affects on the Commercial


Quarry Industry
Revision No.: 4 Page 2 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

FORWARD

Aspasa has been working on the issue of trying to get level playing fields in the quarry industry
for many years.

The issue of illegal mining, borrow pits and inconsistent issuing of mining permits have been a
focus area.

This document is a working document addressing the issues that need attention to ensure a
healthy and vibrant quarry industry.

Input to Aspasa will be appreciated.

NICO PIENAAR
DIRECTOR
Revision No.: 4 Page 3 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

CONTENTS
Page No
Forward 3
Background 4
Introduction 4
Why a committee to look at aggregate resources & the way forward 5/6
Mining License scale operations 7
Mining & Rehabilitation guidelines 7
Putting issues into perspective 8
- Pre-mining phase 9
- Site evaluation 9
- Understanding site drainage 9
- Site preparation 9
- Land clearing & grubbing activities 10
- Stripping activities 10
Mining Phase 11
- Aggregate wash plant area (wet) 11
- Aggregate processing plant area (dry) 11
- Maintenance Areas 12
- Oil discharge response & clean-up 12
- Procedure to be followed in event of discharge 12
Post Mining Phase 13
- Site stabilisation 13
- Slope stability 13
- Diversion 13
- Chutes 13
- Soil Conservation 13
- Debris & Waste Removal 14
- Property grading 14
- About Borrow Pits 14
- Buffer Areas 14
- Hours of Operation 15
- Hot mix facilities 15
Other uses of the Pit 15
- Pit access road and hauling 16
- Visual screening 16
- Excavation below the water table/water-se 16
- Property lines 16
- Utility easement 16
- Erosion control 16
- Concurrent rehabilitation 17
The Way Forward 17
Once Borrow Pit is closed 18
Planning for the Borrow Pit 18
What about no mining plans 18
When is rehabilitation necessary 18
Left open Borrow Pits 19
Operations should take certain measures to ensure that these areas
are secured – some ideas 19
What happens after the contractor leaves the area? 19
What about the roads & vegetation on the site? 19
Topsoil requirements 19
What about the looks of the quarry area? 20
What happens to the land once the contractors have left & the area
has been rehabilitated? 20
Who is responsible for the area once operations have been completed? 21
What are the financial implications? 21
Borrow Pits mitigation measures 21
Management system audit for Borrow Pits 22 – 26
Important Attachments 27
Revision No.: 4 Page 4 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

ROAD BUILDING, BORROW PITS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, QUARRIES:


AFFECTS ON THE COMMERCIAL QUARRY INDUSTRY

1. BACKGROUND

Over many years Aspasa has had to defend the formal quarry industry against illegal
mining, misuse of borrow pits and unfair competition.

Aspasa has had to convince authorities that the playing fields have not been level while
there are clear rules and legislation governing the mining industry in SA which includes
quarries, borrow pits or any other form of extraction from the earth.

At the Road Pavement Forum held in November 2012, Resolution was passed that reads
as follows:

“RPF to form a task team led by Dave Rose:

- To create a common understanding of the impacts of current legislation on borrow


pits approval/usage amongst all public and private sector stakeholders operating in
road delivery.
- To raise the concerns of the road industry with DMR and DEA and to identify and
agree on appropriate approaches to enable road authorities to fulfil their mandates”

The reason for this resolution was that there was a “blockage”: on Borrow Pits by the DMR.

At the recent meeting held in Cape Town 7 – 8 March 2013, Mr. Rose reported back that he
had not achieved much and that there was still a problem.

A new Resolution was passed in May 2013 which read as follows:

“With respect to the planned negotiation with DMR and other bodies on the issue of Borrow
Pits, that Aspasa be included in the exercise, and that Aspasa be tasked to work together
with the COTO Road Materials Committee to resolve this critical issue‟.

Aspasa has indicated that it needs to be involved and some understanding, services, etc.
could be forthcoming if the matter is resolved in such a way that Aspasa members with
formal quarries are not jeopardised.

The problem that is being experienced by some of the contractors is due to the pressure
Aspasa has been putting on the DMR, Green Scorpions and SARS due to the whole illegal
mining issue and serious misuse of borrow pits

2. INTRODUCTION

Sand, gravel and crushed stone are the main types of material aggregate. They are all
essential resources for use in construction today.

The manner in which these resources are mined are under more scrutiny today because of
some bad practices in the past not only in the formal quarry industry but largely also due to
the way construction materials have been extracted in S.A over many years.

The formal aggregate and sand industry has been focused on by authorities but the
informal industry has, it seems, been left out of the scenario.
Revision No.: 4 Page 5 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

Over the last few years Aspasa has been requested to become more involved with
Government agencies in setting up and develop best management practices for part of the
mining industry.

Aspasa and its members have made huge commitments on issues such as Health and
Safety and Environmental issues. Compulsory Audits have been introduced on these
subjects to ensure member companies are legally compliant.

The present issues being raised is due to pressure that ASPASA has been putting on
Regulators to ensure the playing fields are level.

Aspasa‟s goal is to ensure sustainability in the Aggregate production for the future. To
rebuild deteriorating roads, highways, bridges, airports, seaports, waste disposal and
treatment facilities, water and sewer treatment systems and private and public buildings will
require enormous quantities of aggregate to be mined.

An area‟s geology, land ownership, land use and transportation infrastructure are factors
that affect aggregate supply. Although potential sources of sand, gravel and crushed stone
are wide spread and large, land-use choices, economic considerations and environmental
concerns may limit their availability

Providing aggregate resources for S.A.‟s increasing needs will be an ongoing challenge.

Aggregate resources are vital to our way of life because they are the major raw materials
used in the construction of roads, bridges, rail lines, hospitals, schools, homes and
factories.

Aggregate producers can meet the nation‟s demand for aggregate without causing undue
harm to the environment. The question is how to achieve a balance among economic,
social and environmental aspects of aggregate resource development.

3. WHY A COMMITTEE TO LOOK AT AGGREGATE RESOURCES AND THE WAY


FORWARD

As stated in the background section there has been a need established for issues
concerning the need for and the use of aggregate resources. The use of this resource is
ubiquitous, usually overlooked and under developed – but critical to contemporary society.

Aspasa created this committee to examine aggregate issues because of their national
importance and several pressing concerns. The need for infrastructure in S.A. is leading to
a stronger economy and growing population is driving an increased demand for aggregate
resources. The question being asked is:

“Will this resource be available and at what costs, financial, environmental and
social?”

Aspasa estimates that the annual demand for aggregate is over 150 million tons per year,
but due to bad record keeping by the institutions regulating the industry; it is difficult to get a
true reflection on the real figure. Aspasa has for many years been requesting true figures
from the DMR, Stats SA, etc.

The Quarry Industry – Commercial Aggregate and Sand Producers supply aggregates and
sand in all provinces of S.A. Operations are forced to supply resources further from where
they are mined, which results in delivered material costs increasing dramatically due to
Revision No.: 4 Page 6 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

transport costs of the material, therefore competing with unfairly advantaged suppliers,
makes it important to focus on the problem.

Commercial operations have to contend with environmental and social costs associated
with mining aggregates and delivering them to the marketplace. The mining of aggregate
and sand is often opposed by neighbouring residents objecting to noise, dust and the
increased traffic needed to deliver commodities to the marketplace.

Furthermore, when a quarry proposal becomes public, even in a jurisdiction where local
zoning and comprehensive planning are in place and mining is a permitted use, the
response to the proposal by local government varies.

The Aspasa Committee has proposed that certain recommendations be put forward as part
of this exercise:

3.1 That Best Practices for aggregate mining be developed, both in the Commercial
operations as well as other operations that remove material from the earth‟s crust.

This best practice be discussed and agreed to by all role players in the industry,
including regulating bodies etc.

3.2 Minimum rehabilitation standards must be developed for all aggregate and sand
mining.

There is a national set of legislation for mining and also municipal standards. All of
these are confusing, not implemented, not regulated fairly or equitably which forces
the Commercial Quarry Industry to have to comply, but the “others” are not focused
on.

Recent court cases have shown that better regulations have been demanded.

Operating concerns such as noise, dust, hours of operation, traffic, and final
rehabilitation are frequently addressed in local authorisations. The regulations are not
conforming to each other and different standards apply to commercial and non-
commercial aggregate and sand operations.

3.3 That mine planning be filed for all aggregate mining operations. This includes the 5Ha
permit sites as well as the borrow pits, municipal pits etc. Each mine plan will
describe all aspects of mining including interim and final rehabilitation. This will be the
same as what is presently required from a commercial operation that is legal.

3.4 That all parties in the bigger picture of aggregate mining, which includes sand mining,
gravel mining recognises that the consequences of the depletion of the construction
aggregate resources will have a serious impact on the economy. The viability of S.A.
Aggregate resources is fundamental for the public‟s good. If aggregate resources are
not properly identified and managed, both the environment and the public will suffer
detrimental consequences.

It is therefore essential that other interested parties be educated which includes the
public, local government, national government and all those responsible for the
permitting of aggregate mining. The goal of this type of education would be to
minimise the detrimental consequences should long term planning and conservation
of the aggregate resources be ignored.
Revision No.: 4 Page 7 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

4. MINING LICENSE SCALE OPERATIONS

Again Section 22 of the MPRDA requires the necessary application for authorisation to
mine.

Section 23 titled „Granting and duration of mining right‟ makes provision for the Minister
to issue a MINING LICENSE for mining activities larger than those of a Mining Permit and
for periods up to 30 years.

The Mining Permit application requirements are well set out in the DMR web site address

http://portal.samradonline.co.za/forms/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fdefault.aspx

Look for the page titled „SAMRAD ONLINE APPLICATION‟ and extend to the sub-section
titled „MINING RIGHT‟.

The requirements for the issue of a MINING LICENSE are more detailed and stringent than
those required for the issue of a MINING PERMIT and are too detailed to be included here.
Users of this Guideline should refer to the DMR Guideline document included under the
MINING RIGHT section titled –

“Guideline for the Compilation of an Environmental Impact Assessment


and an Environmental Management Programme”.

5. MINING AND REHABILITATION GUIDELINES

Whether mining under a Mining Permit or a Mining License the basic environmental
management principles and legal requirements remain the same. All mining must comply
with –

5.1 the requirements of the Approved Environmental Management Plan for a Mining
Permit, or an Environmental Management Programme for a Mining License;

5.2 requirements of the MPRDA and MHSAct;

5.3 requirements of „other‟ applicable legislation, in particular Section 37 of the MPRDA


refers to the requirements of NEMA. Other legislation includes, but is not limited to,
the NEM:AQA; NWA, NFA, NVFFA, NHRA etc;

5.4 requirements of any authority imposed condition or directive – included in letters of


approval and/or directives from the Authorities;

5.5 the requirements of the operations Environmental Policy; and,

5.6 the requirements of any community or industry agreements the operation may have
entered into.

A rehabilitation plan or programme description should be compiled to outline a staged


approach to mining and, wherever possible should include „Concurrent Rehabilitation‟. The
plan needs to cover the „Pre-mining Environment‟ (wherever possible), the „Development
Phase‟, the „Operational Phase‟ and the „Decommissioning Phase‟ of the operation –
essentially a “Cradle to Grave” approach. The plan should also deal with „Closure
Revision No.: 4 Page 8 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

Rehabilitation‟ and possible post-closure care and maintenance where it is suspected this
will be required.

Typically the following aspects might be covered in a successful plan –

5.7 Objectives of the programme with attention to land use and environment of the
neighbouring areas and to the proposed end-use of the site;

5.8 Sectors to be rehabilitated in successive stages including the timing of these stages,
or justification for delaying rehabilitation until operations are completed;

5.9 Rehabilitation techniques embracing earthworks, top-soil and overburden return,


ripping and any other soil amelioration leading to seedbed preparation, plant species
selection and establishment techniques to be used;

5.10 Outline of any anticipated rehabilitation maintenance programme covering such


aspects as periodic watering, re-fertilisation, irrigation, control of alien and invasive
species, control of vermin, insects and diseases, replacing significant losses, control
of erosion and/or water resource pollution or degradation, etc.; and,

5.11 Intended removal or retention of the various services (water, power, telephone etc.)
and infrastructure elements (unnecessary buildings, foundations, roads, stockpile
areas and berms) on completion of operations, through to the disposal of waste and
the final site clean-up.

6. PUTTING ISSUES IN PERSPECTIVE

Aggregate and sand (includes gravel) mining may be one of the least- regulated of all
mining activities, however aggregate and sand commercial operations have to follow all
National and Provincial regulatory procedures but the informal borrow pits, municipal and
sand wetting operations don‟t seem to have to comply. Developers of buildings often “mine”
under the auspicious that they are not mining but building, the problem being that the
“mined” material is sold.

The mining permit applications for the 5Ha (hectares) don‟t require stringent rules where as
the formal operation has to comply to various standards.

Issues such as appropriate application forms, proof of right to mine the land, maps of the
vicinity and site and rehabilitation plans, a mining plan including plans for pollution control
and water stream protection, a rehabilitation plan, and a rehabilitation fund, all need to be
included in all mining activities.

NB:
The running of a proper commercial operation has various steps that have to be met:

Also see Aspasa‟s document on “Environmental Management of Quarries”.


Revision No.: 4 Page 9 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

6.1 Pre-Mining Phase:


The pre-mining phase of a project requires advanced planning of the mining process
itself and consideration of post-closure options for the site. The property to be mined
should be evaluated to determine whether a sufficient amount of reserves of
adequate quality exists in order to profitably mine the site. This evaluation also
typically includes the location of the property with respect to existing transportation
network and the end market.

6.2 Site Evaluation


The target property to be mined should be evaluated in terms of how the overall
mining process will take place. This is typically called a Mine Plane. The typical
location of the processing plant, office and support facilities, haul road and/or access
routes, product staging areas and overburden placement are important. An evaluation
of the soil type(s) in the area planned for mining is valuable. Susceptibility of erosion
to these aggregates should be known in the pre-planning stages. Since sands, slits
and clays act differently when worked by earthmoving equipment, knowledge of the
geology can reduce the cost incurred during site preparation.

6.3 Understanding Site Drainage


It is important to determine the pre-existing drainage patterns and the areas where
concentrated flow may exist for a potential mine site. Drainage areas are those
locations of the site where runoff will flow in one preferential direction or towards
particular discharge points.

6.3.1 Surface Water Flow


Identifying the receiving water (i.e. lake, stream, pond or wetland) is vital
before site preparation can take place. If sensitive water bodies are
downstream (i.e. wild and scenic rivers, recreational streams, natural
aquatic sites, private ponds and lakes or receiving streams) extra erosion
measures may be needed.

6.3.2 Ground Water Conditions


It is important to preserve the quality of ground water. Ground water
comes from aquifers which transmit water through the subsurface. It is
important to understand that mining of potable aquifer can negatively
affect the well yield of a potable well.

6.4 Site Preparation


Site preparatory activities should be initiated at the mine site only after surface water
drainage and ground water conditions are thoroughly understood.

Once the proposed mine site is understood in terms of surface water drainage and
ground water conditions, site preparation can be initiated.

6.4.1 Construction of Access and Haul Roads


Accesses or secondary and/or haul roads are a necessary component of
a sand and gravel mining operation, especially on a large piece of
property which can require the construction of several roads. Care must
be taken in the construction of those roads so as to minimise affecting the
environment. Roads should be designed to drain at all time by using
crowning, graveling, compacting, ditching, and/or culverting. Proper
construction and maintenance of permanent or temporary access or haul
roads is of vital importance. Road systems should be kept in serviceable
condition to minimise erosion by rainfall runoff and normal vehicle use.
Revision No.: 4 Page 10 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

Where necessary, road surfaces should be gravelled if the base does not
already contain sufficient aggregate.

6.4.1.1 Crowning of Roads – Road surfaces, when constructed,


should be crowned or out-sloped to dissipate surface runoff
and minimise erosion of the road bed.
6.4.1.2 Graveling and Compacting – Graveling and compacting of
the road surface allows for a more permanent and less
maintenance-required road surface. It minimises loose
sediment runoff or tracking of sediment during wet periods
onto public roadways or highways.
6.4.1.3 Ditching and Culverting – Ditches v (diversion, lateral and/or
wing ditches) and culverts can be temporary or permanent
drainage structures that, when adequately sized for specific
use, carry water flow from rainfall alongside or underneath a
roadbed. Ditches and culverts should be sized based on
anticipated rainfall events for the specific region of the country
where it is being constructed. These structures should be
installed at the time of roadway construction. Ditches should
be sloped to prevent silting and to allow for maintenance (i.e.,
digging out of sediment build-up). Ditches and culverts should
be kept free of debris and obstructions in order for them to
allow unrestricted passage of water. Typically ditches can be
used for routing surface water flow away from adjacent
properties offsite.

6.5 Land Clearing and Grubbing Activities


Experienced and trained equipment operators should be used during this stage of the
mining process so that soil disturbance, compaction and displacement are only
provided on those areas ready for immediate use. It is prudent construction practice
to install/construct sediment holding basins before major site grading takes place.
These basins can catch and hold surface runoff before it leaves the site. Additionally,
diverting up-slope water around a planned area for disturbance is also good practice.
It is strongly recommended that areas not to be disturbed until absolutely necessary.
The time of year of land clearing and grubbing activities takes place can also
minimise the impact that inclement weather can have on disturbed/.affected areas. If
possible, disturbed areas should be temporarily stabilised or covered as soon as
possible to minimise impacts on the environment.

It is very important to only clear and grub acreage needed for the immediate term.
Clearing or grubbing too much land too early in the construction phase of the mining
operation will dramatically increase the potential for environmental impacts from
surface water runoff and will increase the cost to control runoff from the mining site.

6.6 Stripping Activities


Stripping is a term used to describe the removal of overburden material or material
which is present atop the valuable sand and gravel reserves. The overburden
material is typically comprised of the valuable topsoil near the immediate ground
surface and then the vadose zone soil (i.e., soil above the normal water table).
Composition or makeup of the overburden material is typically clay, silt and fine sand.
The topsoil material can be temporarily stockpiled for future use in post-mining
activities.
Revision No.: 4 Page 11 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

However, physical space limitations may limit the amount of overburden material that
may be stockpiled at any given time. The cost to strip the material, typically using a
trackhoe and haul truck, can outweigh the value of holding on to this material for
future use. Once mining operations has created a mine pit, concurrent rehabilitation
allows for much of the overburden material to be place back into the mine pit. This
negates or minimises the cost of hauling it an area of the mine property for temporary
storage.

During the stripping phase of the mining process, care should be taken to not affect or
disturb too great of an area such that surface runoff cannot be controlled effectively.
Such a case might allow an excessive build-up of silt or clay in ditches constructed to
control the surface water flow across the site. Normally, surface water flow is directed
to the pit to keep the water table high in extended periods of dry weather.

7. MINING PHASE

7.1 Aggregate Wash Plant Area (Wet Processing)


Process waste water is any water that is used for or results from the production,
clean-up, or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-
product, or waste product. Wastewater treatment alters the characteristics of the
wastewater before discharge and it is often required to achieve compliance.
Examples of treatment include pH adjustment and either physical or chemical means
to settle solids prior to discharge to surface water.

Requirements during this portion of the mining process include proper berming and/or
ditching of pump water from the dredge to the wash plant and back into the mining pit
to avoid unpermitted process water from potentially leaving the property.

Runoff from the stockpiles should be controlled by routing this water back to the open
pit. Rainfall runoff from these stockpiles should also be directed to the open pit.

7.2 Aggregate Processing Plant Area (Dry Processing)


Although significant amounts of sand and gravel are used for fill, bedding, sub base,
and base course without processing, most domestic sand and gravel is processed
prior to use. The processing of sand and gravel for a specific market involves the use
of different combinations of washers, screens, and classifiers to segregate particle
sizes; crushers to reduce oversized material; and storage and loading facilities.

After being transported to the processing plant, the wet sand and gravel (raw feed) is
stockpiled or emptied directly into a hopper, which typically is covered with a set of
parallel bars to screen trash or debris. From the hopper the material is transported to
fixed or vibrating scalping screens by gravity, belt conveyors, hydraulic pump, or
bucket elevators. The scalping screens separate the oversize material from the
smaller size reduction, to produce crushed aggregate or manufactured sand.
Crushing generally is carried out in one or two stages. Following crushing, the
material is returned to the screening operation for additional sizing.

Alternatively, oversize material may be used for erosion control, rehabilitation, or


other uses. The material that passes through the scalping screen is feed into a
battery of sizing screen, which generally consist of horizontal or sloped, single or
multi-deck vibrating screens. Rotating trammel screens with water sprays are used to
process and wash wet sand and gravel. Screening separates the sand and gravel into
different sizes. Water is sprayed onto the material throughout the screening process
Revision No.: 4 Page 12 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

in order to remove clays and other deleterious material. After screening, the sized
gravel is transported to stockpiles, storage bins, or, in some cases, to crushers by belt
conveyors, bucket elevators, or screw conveyors. The sand is freed from the clay and
organic impurities by log washers or rotary scrubbers. After scrubbing, the sand
typically is sized by water classification. Wet and dry screening is rarely used to size
the sand. After classification, the sand is dewatered using screw, cyclones, or hydro
separators.

7.3 Maintenance Areas


Good site management is critical to the control of contamination of storm water.
Storm water quickly picks up pollutants from improperly stored materials, spills and
erosion. Coverage for toxic materials, site grading, channelling of storm water,
preventative maintenance, and employee training are very usual and prudent to
curtail potential problems associated with pollutant-laden storm water discharge.
Source control should be provided for activities such as fuelling, loading and
unloading liquids, and outside storage of raw materials. A Spill Prevention Control&
Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan must be in place to implement spill prevention and
response. Ongoing inspection assures that site management is having the desired
effect.

Fuel and oil storage and handling facilities should be located some distance from the
main sediment and wash water retention facilities. All such facilities should be
equipped with approved containment, monitoring, and collection systems. It is
recommended that fuel storage be done above ground. Runoff from adjacent
surfaces should be routed to a retention pond that can be monitored and cleaned in
the event of a spill.

7.4 Oil Discharge Response & Cleanup


In the event of an oil discharge within the plant area, all manpower and equipment
available should be utilised to prevent the discharge from reaching a navigable
waterway. The most important steps that need to be taken are stopping the discharge
and controlling its impact to the environment.

7.5 Procedure to be followed in the event of discharge:


7.5.1 The first person to notice the discharge should immediately notify the plant
manager, the other service, in turn, should simultaneously implement best
management practices to capture the discharge.
7.5.2 Depending on the size of the spill, the Local Emergency Services should be
notified.
7.5.3 If possible, the source of the leak should be plugged and/or valves closed to
prevent further leakage.
7.5.4 A front-end loader should be immediately available to build a berm or dike
with dry sand to absorb the discharge if the secondary containment should
fail
7.5.5 If the discharge is too large for plant personnel to contain and clean-up, a
contractor should be contacted.

After the leak is repaired, the discharged product should be recovered from the
secondary containment and used as intended, if possible, or disposed of in
accordance with current local or national regulations. If contaminated surface soils
are generated, they must be disposed of in accordance with current local or national
regulations.
Revision No.: 4 Page 13 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

If the amount of discharge is sufficient to be reportable or if the discharge


leaves the plant property, notification should be made to the appropriate
environmental department as soon as possible.

8. POST-MINING PHASE

8.1 Site Stabilization


The Post Mining Phase rehabilitation is dependent on the agreement with the
landowner. These activities may involve the stabilisation of the inactive mining pit or
borrow area with herbaceous perennial plants, stabilising the soil, preventing wind or
water erosion from causing on-site or off-site damage and improving the aesthetic
appeal and the ability of the site to support wildlife. This practice is applicable to sand
and gravel borrow areas which have had the soil profile replaced to approximate
original conditions or where the soil profile has been removed.

Soil characteristics need to be evaluated to help maintain soil stability and prevent
erosion. Some sites may require specific and detailed engineering plans, while others
should apply general guidelines to meet site stabilisation objectives. The following
guidelines may be used to ease the tasks of meeting site stabilisation objectives.

8.2 Slope stability: Cut and fill slopes should not exceed 2:1 to provide better stability.
Gentler slopes (3:1) are preferred to facilitate seeding efforts. Long slops should be
avoided to help prevent erosion and to allow access for seeding, mulching, and
maintenance.

8.3 Diversion: Construct diversion at tops of slope to divert runoff away from the slope
banks to a stable outlet.

8.4 Chutes: Construct aggregate lined chutes or equivalent to conduct concentrated flow
of water to stable outlets.

8.5 Soil Conservation: Rehabilitation of abandoned roads requires reshaping, re-


contouring, and resurfacing with topsoil and seeding for vegetative growth. Removal
of structures such as bridges, culverts, cattle guards and signs is recommended. In
addition, the regarding of sand stockpiles should be removed from property
boundaries to eliminate the potential for offsite discharge from storm water flow.

It is prudent to practice good soil conservation and seed bare ground during the post-
mining phase to aid in minimising and/or reducing the potential for storm water to
wash sediment loads from un-vegetated areas into nearby waterways. Natural
regeneration takes time and during that process much sediment could be washed
away as sheet, rill or gully erosion over that period.

If active re-vegetation is selected, seeds that are conducive to the season and type of
soil present should be used to vegetate any bare areas. Mulching (using hay or
erosion control blankets, for example) also aids in seed germination and helps
prevent or minimise sheet, rill and gully erosion.
Revision No.: 4 Page 14 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

8.6 Debris & Waste Removal


Typical debris from sand and gravel mining usually involves trees and shrubs
generated from the land clearing stage of the mining process. These trees and shrubs
may be placed back into the mined portion of the property and covered with
overburden material. This debris can also be stockpiled and burned if the local Fire
Department and local authority allows and approves of this process beforehand.

The following guidelines apply to the open burning of trees, brush, grass, wood, and
any vegetation in the clearing of land, right-of-way maintenance operations, and
agricultural crop burning. This includes the open burning of structures and material
for fire training; open burning for management of forest and wildlife or disposal of a
fire hazard.

8.6.1 Prevailing winds during the burn should always be away from any city or
occupied residence likely to be affected by the smoke to the best extent
possible;
8.6.2 The amount of dirt in the material being burned should be minimised to
reduce smouldering;
8.6.3 Oils, rubber tyres, railroad ties, treated wood, and any other material creating
unreasonable amounts of smoke or air pollutants may not be burned;
8.6.4 No hazardous waste or material shall be burned;
8.6.5 Opening burning should be conducted between sunrise and before sunset.
This allows for good smoke dispersion;
8.6.6 Fuel should not be added outside the timeline listed above;
8.6.7 An open burn should be extinguished completely to ensure smouldering of
material does not persist;
8.6.7 Open burning should not obscure visibility or create a traffic hazard on any
public road or airport right of way;
8.6.8 The following entities should be notified of when and where the open burn
will occur: local fire department, municipality nearest the burn, South African
Police Services, and any military, commercial, or private airport or landing
strip that may be affected by the open burn. Many complaints and disputes
can be avoided by informing people ahead of time of the open burn. It is very
important to contact your local fire department. This will ensure that sufficient
personnel will be available in the event that control of the burn is lost;
8.6.9 Common sense precautions, such as having someone watch the fire until it
is extinguished and assuring smoke doesn‟t impact residences or impair
vehicular travel on highways should be followed.

8.7 Property Grading


After the mining activities are completed, grading of the property should be
conducted. This minimises non-point source storm water pollution (i.e., sediment
fines) from impacting potential pathways such as stream, creeks tributaries, lakes etc.

8.8 About Borrow Pits


A borrow pit is a land use involving the excavation or digging of material for use as fill
at another site and incudes the pit area, stockpiles, haul roads, entrance roads,
scales, crusher, and all related facilities.

8.9. Buffer Areas


8.9.1 The buffer between the property line of a pit and adjacent parcels containing
a residence or public/semi-public-building shall be 30 meters in order to
quality as a residence or public/semi-public use, such a parcel must have the
principal structure within 91 meters of the property line adjacent to the
Revision No.: 4 Page 15 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

proposed pit. The 30 meter buffer may be altered through an agreement


with the adjacent property owner. Proof of the agreement shall be filed with
the DMR and mines validity and the agreement shall specifically state what
activities may take place within the buffer area.
8.9.2 The buffer area may be used under the following circumstances:
8.9.2.1 It may contain the haul road if it is determined by the public road
authority that the pit access needs to be within the buffer area
because of safety purposes.
8.9.2.2 The haul road may be placed in the buffer area to avoid wetlands.

In either case 1 or 2 above, the haul road must be moved away from the
property line as soon as possible unless permission is obtained by the
adjacent property owner.
8.9.3 There shall be a 15 meter no disturbance buffer area for all other parcels not
listed above, unless the adjacent property owner provides a written
authorisation of reduced buffer. The 15 meter buffer shall apply to all
highways and the buffer area shall begin at the edge of the highway right-of-
way.

8.10 Hours of Operation


Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. Monday through Saturday.
The hours may be expanded either through conditional use permit approval or by the
pit operator obtaining the signatures of two thirds of the resident property owners
within one quarter mile of the pit. The petition must be renewed on an annual basis.

8.10.1 Equipment maintenance may take place at any time if done within an
enclosed structure or if maintenance is part of an extended hour petition.
8.10.2 Hours and days of operation may also be extended when an emergency
exists. An emergency is a short-term, unplanned and unexpected event
where an immediate need for borrow material exists in order to address a
significant threat to the public safety.
8.10.3 No operations may take place on Public holidays.

8.11 Hot Mix Facilities


8.11.1 Permanent hot mix facilities require specific approval from the
DMR/Municipality or Department of Environmental Affairs.
8.11.2 Portable hot mix facilities are allowed for special projects without a permit if
no residence is located within 300 feet of the pit and the facility is limited to
being in the pit two working days per 1,000 tons of hot mix. The time of the
pit shall begin with the start-up of production.

9. OTHER USES OF THE PIT

A borrow pit shall be used soley for operations directly related to a borrow pit. Any other
use shall require a conditional use approval from the DMR/Environmental Affairs.

It shall be the responsibility of the pit operator or owner to control activity within the pit area
and to clean up debris or other material left on site. If done in conjunction with a hot mix
operation, the recycling of asphalt may be done in a borrow pit. Storage of asphalt,
including concrete, is permitted in a general purpose or public works pit provided it is part of
an on-going recycling effort.
Revision No.: 4 Page 16 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

9.1 Pit Access Road and Hauling


9.1.1 All entrances and exits shall be constructed so as to avoid creating a safety
hazard. The pit access road shall be placed in a manner that minimises the
view into the pit from the public road or any residence unless the road
authority required improved visibility for safety purposes.
9.1.2 During the hours of pit operation, “Trucks Hauling” signs shall be placed
along all public roadways leading to the pit at a distance not less than 500
feet from the pit access road.
9.1.3 A pit shall have a barrier controlling access and such barriers shall be clearly
visible to prevent safety hazards to the public. The use of cable, chain or
similar barrier is prohibited. The control barrier shall deny access when the
pit is not in operation.
9.1.4 Dust control measures shall be utilised on non-paved routes in accordance
with the policy of the local road authority. Dust control measures shall also
take place within the pit itself, if adjacent properties would be affected by
dust leaving the site.

9.2 Visual Screening


Existing vegetation shall remain as a screen between the pit site and surrounding
residences, public roads, or parks. If screening is not sufficient to block the view of
the borrow pit from any residence, road or park, the Regulator may require additional
screening or placement of a fence and/or berm, when such additional screening is
topographically feasible.

9.3 Excavation below the Water Table/Water Use


Excavation below the water table is permitted with appropriate Department of Water
permits provided there is no adverse impact upon the quality and quantity of nearby
surface water or wells.
The Department shall receive proof of any authorisation from the Department of
Mineral Resources for use of surface or ground water used in borrow pit operations.

9.4 Property Lines


All property lines shall be located by a Registered Land Survey – or with the line
location approved by the Surveyors. This requirement may be waived if the adjacent
property owners and the borrow pit owner/operator agree to the property lines and the
agreement is recorded and submitted to the DMR.

9.5 Utility Easements


All utility easements shall be observed and any encroachment into the utility right of
way shall only be permitted with the written approval of the utility.

9.6 Road Weight Limits


All road weights limits and other road restrictions placed in effect by the local road
authority shall be observed.

9.7 Erosion Control


9.7.1 Erosion control measures must be taken in all parts of the pit operation,
including the access road, in order to avoid potential damage to adjacent
land and to control sedimentation that has potential to leave the site.
9.7.2 Erosion and sediment control measures shall conform to the standards of the
Department of Environment.
Revision No.: 4 Page 17 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

9.7.3 All erosion and sediment control measures must be approved by the
Department of Environment. The owner or operator shall maintain all such
practices until the pit area is permanently stabilised or reclaimed.

9.8 Concurrent Rehabilitation


9.8.1 A concurrent rehabilitation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
DMR. The stripping and stockpiling of the upper six inches of soil is a
required component and all rehabilitation plans. These stock piles shall be
seeded and only used for rehabilitation purposes.

10. THE WAY FORWARD

To meet the industry needs properly, regulations and control is required.

The control of borrow pits is not yet optimal. Commercial quarries are discarding suitable
material, which is being supplied by nearby borrow pits. The granting of commercial
licences does not consider density or cumulative impact.

There is a growing awareness of the importance of sound environmental management


amongst Aspasa members. Strategies need to be developed to offset inconsistencies and
non-availability of comprehensive regulatory standards and guidelines, as well as
monitoring and enforcement.

Some suggestions are:

10.1 The DMR, Environmental Agency like DEA, Water Affairs, and Municipalities have
the responsibility of prescribing standards and guidelines to prevent all forms of
environmental damage including sand and gravel borrow pits. This should be done
in consultation and harmonisation with formal Commercial Quarries and/or
Aspasa. It should also be done Nationally, Provincially and by Municipalities.
10.2 The Regulators need to ensure that gravel pits, borrow pits, construction pits and
municipal quarries adhere to guidelines and standards as outlined in the present
legislation. In the case of failure to adhere to the prescribed guidelines proposed
should therefore deny the contractor the right to mine.
10.3 An Integrated Environmental Assessment Management and Monitoring program
should be part of any gravel, borrow pit or other extraction operation and
encouraged at national, regional municipal and local levels. Assessment should be
used to predict possible environmental impacts and to encourage public
participation at the decision level. A mitigation and restoration strategy should be
included in any management programme. Monitoring must be used to determine if
the assessments were correct to detect environmental changes, and to support
future decisions.
10.4 Best Management Practices will be followed for the general investigation
measures for the borrow pit, gravel or municipal quarries:
10.5 Minimising the surface area of the borrow pit where possible;
10.6 Minimise rock and borrow pit cuts where possible;
10.7 Maintain the floor of the borrow pit slightly above the elevation of the surrounding
area to promote drainage to avoid creating quarry lakes and to prevent permanent
degradation in borrow pits;
10.8 Prevent erosion and sedimentation through appropriate control measures;
10.9 Protect archaeological resources
10.10 Maintain air quality through dust control/suppression;
10.11 Use progressive rehabilitation in closing borrow pits no longer than needed.
Revision No.: 4 Page 18 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

11. ONCE BORROW PIT IS CLOSED

During the course of borrow pit excavations, operations should be planned in such a way
that the amount of work that will be necessary for the finishing off of the borrow pit is
reduced as far as possible. Indiscriminate excavation without due regard for the desired
final shape of the borrow pit should not be permitted and should be rectified immediately.

12. PLANNING FOR THE BORROW PIT

Ideally Closure Objectives should have been set as part of the Mining Plan. These
objectives would guide environmental management during the cessation of mining
operations and subsequent closure and determine the “legacy of what gets left behind”
pursuant to the abandonment of the site. At the point where closure is eminent, the Closure
Objective should be revisited and reviewed, and the measures that need to be
implemented to achieve these objectives should be confirmed as part of a
closure/rehabilitation process. It may be appropriate at this stage to revisit any potential
residual impacts and ensure that the identified measures are adequate to address these.

13. WHAT ABOUT NO MINING PLANS?

Yes, there are often circumstances where a Mining Plan may not have been developed for
a particular borrow pit, e.g. where the pit is a historic site, which has been abandoned, or
where the development and operation of the pit preceded the legal and good practice
requirements were not followed. In these circumstances, a Closure Plan would need to be
developed to identify the key Closure Objectives and highlight the remedial/rehabilitation
measures required to achieve these.

The first step in formulating a Closure Plan would be to undertake a risk assessment.
During the development of this Closure plan the key questions are “What mitigation
measures are required to leave the borrow pit in an acceptable state” and “What are
the potential residual risks and how should these be mitigated”.

14. WHEN IS RABHILITATION NECESSARY?

The timing of rehabilitation is important, and rehabilitation of disturbed areas should ideally
be programmed to occur as soon as practically possible following the cessation of the work
in a specific area. The period between cessation of activities associated with the mining of
materials and the onset of rehabilitation for that area should ideally not exceed 1 month.

Rehabilitation operations should ideally be conducted in parallel with extraction.


Accordingly, progressive rehabilitation, in which depleted sections of a borrow pit are
reclaimed while extraction is on-going in other sections of the same pit is encouraged. This
approach is particularly well suited to large borrow pits and to long-term operations, and is
especially effective when the intended end-use is “nature area”, as it enhances the
establishment of plant communities. In addition to this approach:
14.1 Reduces the visual impact of the borrow pit or quarry;
14.2 Facilitates adequate conservation and utilisation of topsoil;
14.3 Simplifies the management of runoff and attended erosion;
14.4 Minimises the effect of operations on nearby communities and plan/animal
population.
Revision No.: 4 Page 19 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

15. LEFT OPEN BORROW PITS

In SA there are many borrow pits that have been left with no rehabilitation or measures
taken to secure the areas. Public safety has not been seen as an important issue in the
past and many animals and children have drowned in abandoned borrow pits.

16. OPERATORS SHOULD TAKE CERTAIN MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT THESE


AREAS ARE SECURED – SOME IDEAS:

16.1 Where the borrow pit is likely to impose a significant risk after rehabilitation, e.g.
dangerous slopes (steeper than 1 : 2 or unstable), not free draining, developed as
a farm dam, not visible etc., then the perimeter of the borrow pit, as defined by the
expropriation or landowner agreement, should be secured with permanent fencing.
16.2 Stock-proof fencing, in concert with appropriate signage, should be utilised as a
minimum and should be maintained in a satisfactory condition.
16.3 A gate should be provided to permit access to the site for the on-going monitoring
and management of the site rehabilitation.
16.4 Care should be taken not to damage existing fences and gates.

17. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE CONTRACTOR OPERATOR LEAVES THE


AREA?

It is essential that site areas are cleaned up and returned to an acceptable state when an
operation is closed down.

Some measures to assist with this are:


17.1 Infrastructure that has been erected at the site should be demolished and
removed.
17.2 All equipment, plant, concrete footings, fencing, etc., should be removed from site;
17.3 All services should be dismantled and removed from site;
17.4 All foreign materials should be removed from site;
17.5 Domestic or other waste should not be disposed of in the borrow pit, but should be
removed from site and disposed of ay an appropriate landfill; and
17.6 Soil contaminated with oil, grease, fuel or other hydrocarbon should not be
disposed of in the excavation.

18. WHAT ABOUT THE ROADS AND VEGETATION ON THE SITE?

Access roads should be:


17.7 Made specifically for the mining activities, and which are not required by the
landowner, should be rehabilitated.
17.8 Be rehabilitated by ripping the surface crust to ensure the re-growth of vegetation.
In some cases it may be necessary to plough the area and re-vegetation to ensure
that a sustainable and desirable land use is achieved.
17.9 The requisite permanent drainage works and erosion protection measures should
be set in place.
Revision No.: 4 Page 20 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

19. TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS

19.1 Approximately 50 to 100mm of previously stripped and stockpiled overburden


material should be applied to the newly shaped and scarified/.ripped borrow pit.
19.2 Before placing topsoil, all visible weeds should be removed from the placement
areas and from the topsoil. The previously stripped and stockpiled topsoil should
generally be spread evenly over the prepared surface to a depth of 75 to 150mm
on slopes of 1: 3 or steeper.
19.3 Topsoil placement shall occur in a phased manner, concurrent with the phased
operation of the borrow pit. Topsoil should be placed in the same areas from which
it was stripped.
19.4 Where amounts are inadequate to cover the entire area, slopes should receive
priority treatment.

20. WHAT ABOUT THE LOOKS OF THE QUARRY AREA?

20.1 Areas not properly rehabilitated are an eye sore and therefore screening is
necessary to ensure acceptable and sustainable environmental areas are left
behind. Some requirements:

20.1.1 The most effective way to mitigate the visual impacts associated with a
borrow pit is via the effective implementation of the rehabilitation process,
and the attainment of stable slopes and acceptable vegetation.
20.1.2 For some sights rehabilitation may not be adequate to address the impact
on the visual aesthetics. Hence, consideration should be given to the
visual screening of sites that are unsightly, are highly visible or are located
in visually sensitive areas.

20.2 Visual screening could include:

20.2.1 Erecting earth bunds of at least 1 m high on the boundary/periphery of the


borrow pit;
20.2.2 Planting vegetation, viz. trees, shrubs or tall grasses. In some areas it
may be appropriate to use alien plant species, such as pines, to facilitate
visual screening e.g. within or adjacent to forestry plantations.

21. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE LAND ONCE THE CONTRACTORS HAVE LEFT AND
THE AREA HAS BEEN REHABILITATED?

It is often found that other operators or opportunist visit areas that have been mined to
continue with the removal of material. These situations are often than not controlled or
regulated and deteriorate into gaping holes.

21.1 Re-vegetation should not occur in any areas until all operations within those areas
have been complete.
21.2 Once re-vegetation, areas should be protected to prevent tramping and erosion.
21.3 No construction equipment, vehicles or unauthorised personnel should be allowed
onto areas that have been vegetated.
21.4 Only persons or equipment required for the preparation of areas, application of
fertilizer and spreading of topsoil should be allowed to operate on these areas.
21.5 Where rehabilitation sites are located within actively grazed areas, they should be
fenced.
21.6 Fencing should be removed once a sound vegetation cover has been achieved.
Revision No.: 4 Page 21 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

21.7 Any runnels, erosion channels or wash away developing after re-vegetation should
be backfilled and consolidated and the areas restored to a proper stable condition.
The erosion should not be allowed to develop on a large scale before effecting
repairs and all erosion damage should be repaired as soon as possible.

22. WHO IS RESPONSBILE FOR THE AREA ONCE OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED?

The licence/permit holder stay liable until a Closure Certificate has been issued for the site
by the DMR

23. WHAT ARE THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS?


In terms of the requirements of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act,
financial provision must be made for the closure or sudden cessation of any work and for
any rehabilitation/re-vegetation work

The issue of financial provisions and applicability to road maintenance activities being
undertaken by Provinces has specifically been raised with DMR and the following has been
agreed:
23.1 Where the road maintenance is undertaken by an independent Contractor, since
the Contractor will sign a formal Contract with Province, financial provision for
closure or sudden cessation of work be provided for via the Contract Agreement.
The financial guarantees provided by the Contractor would also be available for
any remedial work. Given the scale of mining activities associated with borrow pits,
it is anticipated that this would be more than adequate to meet the remedial
requirements.

24. BORROW PITS MITIGATION MEASURES


24.1 The ranking of mitigation options is as follows:

24.1.1 Avoidance – using an alternate site or technology to avoid the adverse


effect all together. This is the most desirable;
24.1.2 Minimisation - taking actions to minimise and/or contain effects to the
maximum extent possible during engineering design, construction,
operation and closure;
24.1.3 Rectification – taking actions to rehabilitate or restore the affected
environment after the fact; and
24.1.4 Compensation – this is used as a last resort to offset adverse
environmental effects. This is the least desirable.

24.2 Best management practices will employ the following general mitigation measures
for the borrow pits:

24.2.1 Minimise the surface area of borrow pits where possible;


24.2.2 Minimise rock and borrow pit cuts where possible;
24.2.3 Maintain the floor of the borrow pits slightly above the elevation of the
surrounding area to promote drainage, to avoid creating quarry lakes and
to prevent permafrost degradation in borrow pits;
24.2.4 Prevent erosion and sedimentation through appropriate control measures;
24.2.5 Carry out testing and water quality monitoring in support of mitigation
measures;
24.2.6 Protect archaeological resources;
24.2.7 Maintain air quality through dust control/suppression; and
24.2.8 Use progressive rehabilitation in closing borrow pits no longer needed.
Revision No.: 4 Page 22 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

25. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT FOR BORROW PITS

25.1 Introduction

The scope of this audit document is designed to cover the implementation of safety
standards associated with the management of all borrow pit operations.

The audit is split up into section covering management systems, induction,


procedures and training, statutory compliance, accident/incident reporting and
investigation, occupational health, behaviour and culture, mobile plant, fixed plant,
workshop, isolation and tagging and emergency plan.

Where, in the intent, the word “verify” is used, this means that it is a regulatory
requirement, which is mandatory and has to be complied with. Where, in the
intent, the word, “ensure” is used, it is not a mandatory requirement, but it does set
out a recommended safe method which, if followed, should minimise the potential
for an adverse incident to take place.

25.2 Management Systems


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. There is a current written policy
statement that sets out the Safety and
Health Policy of the organisation.
2. Contractors employed at the site are
required to comply with the principal
employer‟s Safety and Health Policy.
3. Management have provided the
applicable statutory mine record books
required.
4. A current site organisation chart is
available.
5. Management have established
documented permit systems for certain
categories of work.
6. The principal employer has developed
and implemented a Safety and Health
Plan for the site and each work group.
7. Management have established a
system of employee input with regard
to safety and health.
8. Safety and Health Meetings are held.
9. Personal protective clothing and
equipment (PPE) is provided to all
employees at no cost.
10. Means of internal and external
communications are available on site.
Revision No.: 4 Page 23 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

25.3 Inductions, procedures, training and supervision


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. There is a safety induction process for this
site.
2. Safe systems of work have been
developed and implemented by each
employer.
3. Management issues clear on the job safety
instructions prior to any work being
commenced at the site.
4. Personnel are trained and assessed as
competent to perform allocated tasks.
5. Management maintains a file record of
each employee‟s training history.
6. Management have appointed competent
personnel to supervise employees.

25.4 Statutory Compliance


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. Management carries out its statutory
responsibilities in respect to the inspection
of workplaces.
2. The Registered Manager ensures that
appointed persons perform all duties
imposed on them in writing under the Act.
3. Management has complied with the
primary statutory responsibilities in respect
of the installation, operation and licensing
of its electrical installation.
4. Management carries out its statutory
responsibilities in respect of the
registration, inspection and maintenance of
Classified Plant.

25.5 Accident / Incident Reporting and Investigation


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. Management have established an
immediate hazard/occurrence/accident
reporting, control and rectification process.
2. Management carries out its statutory
responsibilities in respect of the recording
and reporting of serious accidents and
potentially serious accidents.
3. Management carries out its statutory
responsibilities in respect of the recording
and reporting of injuries to workers and the
total hours worked by employees and the
number of employees.
4. Management carries out its statutory
responsibilities in respect of the recording
and reporting of occurrences and
potentially serious occurrences.
5. Formal procedures are in place to
investigate accidents, occurrences and
property damage.
Revision No.: 4 Page 24 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

25.6 Occupational Health


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. Occupational health hazards have been
identified.
2. Control measures are in place to reduce
occupational health hazards identified.
3. The control measures implemented to
reduce occupational health hazards are
effective.
4. Employees have been educated in the
occupational health hazards identified.
5. The exposure level of employees to
occupational health hazards has been
evaluated.
6. Management has caused a noise report to
be complied.
7. Where necessary, employees wear
appropriate personal protective equipment
to reduce exposure to occupational health
hazards identified.

25.7 Behaviour and Culture


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. Disciplinary procedures are in place for
unacceptable behaviour and unsafe acts.
2. The disciplinary procedure is enforced by
management.

25.8 Mobile Plant


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. A competent person is appointed to
supervise maintenance.
2. There is a system of maintenance for
mobile plant.
3. Records are kept for maintenance of
mobile plant.
4. There is a system to make checks and
approve the arrival of all company and
contractors‟ mobile plant.
5. There is a document to show that operator
pre-start checks are carried out for mobile
plant.
6. There is a procedure to report operational
faults on mobile plant.
7. The faults are rectified in an acceptable
timeframe.
8. Operational mobile plant is provided with a
functioning two way radio communication.
9. ROPS, where necessary, is provided and
maintained.
10. FOPS, where necessary, is provided and
maintained.
11. Mobile plant operators are trained and
assessed for competency.

12. The access road into the mine is


Revision No.: 4 Page 25 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

segregated from mobile off-highway


earthmoving equipment operations.
13. Access roads, haul roads and benches are
maintained in a safe condition.

25.9 Fixed Plant


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. Fixed plant drives and moving parts are
suitably guarded.
2. Fixed plant is provided with safe access
including walkways, platforms.
3. Fixed plant and buildings so far as is
practicable are provided with alternative
means of egress.
4. The walkways and platforms provide
access to major items for both operation
and maintenance.
5. Handrails and guard rails are provided for
elevated walkways and platforms.
6. Items of fixed plant have a primary isolator.
7. The applicable items of fixed plant have a
local isolator.
8. The isolation switches are labelled.
9. The isolation switches have provision for
securing an isolation device.
10. The hazards associated with the manual
cleaning of fixed plant have been
identified.
11. The procedure for the manual cleaning of
fixed plant requires that, where a hazard
exists, the plant directly involved is
stopped, isolated and tagged.

25.10 Workshop
1. A workshop facility is provided for the
maintenance of fixed and mobile plant.
2. The facility is appropriate for the types of
tasks undertaken.
3. The workshop has adequate facilities for
the stable jacking of mobile equipment.
4. Proper material handling and support
equipment is provided for the tasks
undertaken.
5. Adequate lighting is available for work to
be carried out safely at the workshop.
6. The workshop facility is maintained in a
tidy condition.
7. Signs are provided to warn of possible
eye, hearing and other safety hazards.
8. Fire control equipment is available at the
workshop.
9. Machinery is maintained on a regular
basis.
10. Gas cylinders are restrained.
11. Gas hoses and gauges are free from
damage.
Revision No.: 4 Page 26 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

12. Flash back arrestors are adequately sized


and fitted to portable and mobile oxy-fuel
gas systems for welding, cutting and
heating metal.
13. Electrical tools and equipment at the
workshop are periodically checked and
tagged.
14. Electrical welding machines are
maintained in a safe condition.

25.11 Isolation and Tagging


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. OUT OF SERVICE tags are used to warn
against the use of plant which is unsafe to
be used or which may be damaged if it is
used.
2. DANGER tags are used to prohibit the use
of plant on which an employee is
undertaking work.
3. Each employee removes his own
DANGER tag after completing the work
and prior to leaving the worksite at the end
of the shift.
4. OUT OF SERVICE tags are attached prior
to removing DANGER tags when work on
plant is not completed.
5. The effectiveness of devices used to
isolate plant is proved prior to attaching
DANGER or OUT OF SERVICE tags.

25.12 Emergency Plan


Point Standard Standard Met Comments
1. The operation has prepared and
emergency plan.
2. The emergency plan is known by the site
personnel.
3. The emergency plan includes a means of
employee and visitor control.
4. The emergency plan identifies the types of
incidents which may affect the site.
5. On-site first aid services and facilities are
available at the site.
6. On-site fire fighting resources, include
trained personnel are available.
7. Muster points are installed at the site.
8. Underground sites have established a
mine rescue capability including SCBA, fire
fighting and resources and trained
personnel.
Revision No.: 4 Page 27 of 27

Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013

26. IMPORTANT ATTACHMENTS

The guidelines as per:

26.1 South African Pavement Engineering Manual, Chapter 8, Material


Sources will be followed.
(See SANRAL – dated January 2013 – Version 1) -
www.nra.co.za/content/SAPEM_Chapter_8_Jan2013.pdf

26.2 Environmental Management of Quarries (Attached)

This manual to be applicable to all Borrow Pits Nationally, Regionally and by Municipalities,
Government Departments, Provincial Departments and Municipalities.

You might also like