Borrow Pits - Rev 4 - 8 November 2013
Borrow Pits - Rev 4 - 8 November 2013
Borrow Pits - Rev 4 - 8 November 2013
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
FORWARD
Aspasa has been working on the issue of trying to get level playing fields in the quarry industry
for many years.
The issue of illegal mining, borrow pits and inconsistent issuing of mining permits have been a
focus area.
This document is a working document addressing the issues that need attention to ensure a
healthy and vibrant quarry industry.
NICO PIENAAR
DIRECTOR
Revision No.: 4 Page 3 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
CONTENTS
Page No
Forward 3
Background 4
Introduction 4
Why a committee to look at aggregate resources & the way forward 5/6
Mining License scale operations 7
Mining & Rehabilitation guidelines 7
Putting issues into perspective 8
- Pre-mining phase 9
- Site evaluation 9
- Understanding site drainage 9
- Site preparation 9
- Land clearing & grubbing activities 10
- Stripping activities 10
Mining Phase 11
- Aggregate wash plant area (wet) 11
- Aggregate processing plant area (dry) 11
- Maintenance Areas 12
- Oil discharge response & clean-up 12
- Procedure to be followed in event of discharge 12
Post Mining Phase 13
- Site stabilisation 13
- Slope stability 13
- Diversion 13
- Chutes 13
- Soil Conservation 13
- Debris & Waste Removal 14
- Property grading 14
- About Borrow Pits 14
- Buffer Areas 14
- Hours of Operation 15
- Hot mix facilities 15
Other uses of the Pit 15
- Pit access road and hauling 16
- Visual screening 16
- Excavation below the water table/water-se 16
- Property lines 16
- Utility easement 16
- Erosion control 16
- Concurrent rehabilitation 17
The Way Forward 17
Once Borrow Pit is closed 18
Planning for the Borrow Pit 18
What about no mining plans 18
When is rehabilitation necessary 18
Left open Borrow Pits 19
Operations should take certain measures to ensure that these areas
are secured – some ideas 19
What happens after the contractor leaves the area? 19
What about the roads & vegetation on the site? 19
Topsoil requirements 19
What about the looks of the quarry area? 20
What happens to the land once the contractors have left & the area
has been rehabilitated? 20
Who is responsible for the area once operations have been completed? 21
What are the financial implications? 21
Borrow Pits mitigation measures 21
Management system audit for Borrow Pits 22 – 26
Important Attachments 27
Revision No.: 4 Page 4 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
1. BACKGROUND
Over many years Aspasa has had to defend the formal quarry industry against illegal
mining, misuse of borrow pits and unfair competition.
Aspasa has had to convince authorities that the playing fields have not been level while
there are clear rules and legislation governing the mining industry in SA which includes
quarries, borrow pits or any other form of extraction from the earth.
At the Road Pavement Forum held in November 2012, Resolution was passed that reads
as follows:
The reason for this resolution was that there was a “blockage”: on Borrow Pits by the DMR.
At the recent meeting held in Cape Town 7 – 8 March 2013, Mr. Rose reported back that he
had not achieved much and that there was still a problem.
“With respect to the planned negotiation with DMR and other bodies on the issue of Borrow
Pits, that Aspasa be included in the exercise, and that Aspasa be tasked to work together
with the COTO Road Materials Committee to resolve this critical issue‟.
Aspasa has indicated that it needs to be involved and some understanding, services, etc.
could be forthcoming if the matter is resolved in such a way that Aspasa members with
formal quarries are not jeopardised.
The problem that is being experienced by some of the contractors is due to the pressure
Aspasa has been putting on the DMR, Green Scorpions and SARS due to the whole illegal
mining issue and serious misuse of borrow pits
2. INTRODUCTION
Sand, gravel and crushed stone are the main types of material aggregate. They are all
essential resources for use in construction today.
The manner in which these resources are mined are under more scrutiny today because of
some bad practices in the past not only in the formal quarry industry but largely also due to
the way construction materials have been extracted in S.A over many years.
The formal aggregate and sand industry has been focused on by authorities but the
informal industry has, it seems, been left out of the scenario.
Revision No.: 4 Page 5 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Over the last few years Aspasa has been requested to become more involved with
Government agencies in setting up and develop best management practices for part of the
mining industry.
Aspasa and its members have made huge commitments on issues such as Health and
Safety and Environmental issues. Compulsory Audits have been introduced on these
subjects to ensure member companies are legally compliant.
The present issues being raised is due to pressure that ASPASA has been putting on
Regulators to ensure the playing fields are level.
Aspasa‟s goal is to ensure sustainability in the Aggregate production for the future. To
rebuild deteriorating roads, highways, bridges, airports, seaports, waste disposal and
treatment facilities, water and sewer treatment systems and private and public buildings will
require enormous quantities of aggregate to be mined.
An area‟s geology, land ownership, land use and transportation infrastructure are factors
that affect aggregate supply. Although potential sources of sand, gravel and crushed stone
are wide spread and large, land-use choices, economic considerations and environmental
concerns may limit their availability
Providing aggregate resources for S.A.‟s increasing needs will be an ongoing challenge.
Aggregate resources are vital to our way of life because they are the major raw materials
used in the construction of roads, bridges, rail lines, hospitals, schools, homes and
factories.
Aggregate producers can meet the nation‟s demand for aggregate without causing undue
harm to the environment. The question is how to achieve a balance among economic,
social and environmental aspects of aggregate resource development.
As stated in the background section there has been a need established for issues
concerning the need for and the use of aggregate resources. The use of this resource is
ubiquitous, usually overlooked and under developed – but critical to contemporary society.
Aspasa created this committee to examine aggregate issues because of their national
importance and several pressing concerns. The need for infrastructure in S.A. is leading to
a stronger economy and growing population is driving an increased demand for aggregate
resources. The question being asked is:
“Will this resource be available and at what costs, financial, environmental and
social?”
Aspasa estimates that the annual demand for aggregate is over 150 million tons per year,
but due to bad record keeping by the institutions regulating the industry; it is difficult to get a
true reflection on the real figure. Aspasa has for many years been requesting true figures
from the DMR, Stats SA, etc.
The Quarry Industry – Commercial Aggregate and Sand Producers supply aggregates and
sand in all provinces of S.A. Operations are forced to supply resources further from where
they are mined, which results in delivered material costs increasing dramatically due to
Revision No.: 4 Page 6 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
transport costs of the material, therefore competing with unfairly advantaged suppliers,
makes it important to focus on the problem.
Commercial operations have to contend with environmental and social costs associated
with mining aggregates and delivering them to the marketplace. The mining of aggregate
and sand is often opposed by neighbouring residents objecting to noise, dust and the
increased traffic needed to deliver commodities to the marketplace.
Furthermore, when a quarry proposal becomes public, even in a jurisdiction where local
zoning and comprehensive planning are in place and mining is a permitted use, the
response to the proposal by local government varies.
The Aspasa Committee has proposed that certain recommendations be put forward as part
of this exercise:
3.1 That Best Practices for aggregate mining be developed, both in the Commercial
operations as well as other operations that remove material from the earth‟s crust.
This best practice be discussed and agreed to by all role players in the industry,
including regulating bodies etc.
3.2 Minimum rehabilitation standards must be developed for all aggregate and sand
mining.
There is a national set of legislation for mining and also municipal standards. All of
these are confusing, not implemented, not regulated fairly or equitably which forces
the Commercial Quarry Industry to have to comply, but the “others” are not focused
on.
Recent court cases have shown that better regulations have been demanded.
Operating concerns such as noise, dust, hours of operation, traffic, and final
rehabilitation are frequently addressed in local authorisations. The regulations are not
conforming to each other and different standards apply to commercial and non-
commercial aggregate and sand operations.
3.3 That mine planning be filed for all aggregate mining operations. This includes the 5Ha
permit sites as well as the borrow pits, municipal pits etc. Each mine plan will
describe all aspects of mining including interim and final rehabilitation. This will be the
same as what is presently required from a commercial operation that is legal.
3.4 That all parties in the bigger picture of aggregate mining, which includes sand mining,
gravel mining recognises that the consequences of the depletion of the construction
aggregate resources will have a serious impact on the economy. The viability of S.A.
Aggregate resources is fundamental for the public‟s good. If aggregate resources are
not properly identified and managed, both the environment and the public will suffer
detrimental consequences.
It is therefore essential that other interested parties be educated which includes the
public, local government, national government and all those responsible for the
permitting of aggregate mining. The goal of this type of education would be to
minimise the detrimental consequences should long term planning and conservation
of the aggregate resources be ignored.
Revision No.: 4 Page 7 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Again Section 22 of the MPRDA requires the necessary application for authorisation to
mine.
Section 23 titled „Granting and duration of mining right‟ makes provision for the Minister
to issue a MINING LICENSE for mining activities larger than those of a Mining Permit and
for periods up to 30 years.
The Mining Permit application requirements are well set out in the DMR web site address
http://portal.samradonline.co.za/forms/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fdefault.aspx
Look for the page titled „SAMRAD ONLINE APPLICATION‟ and extend to the sub-section
titled „MINING RIGHT‟.
The requirements for the issue of a MINING LICENSE are more detailed and stringent than
those required for the issue of a MINING PERMIT and are too detailed to be included here.
Users of this Guideline should refer to the DMR Guideline document included under the
MINING RIGHT section titled –
Whether mining under a Mining Permit or a Mining License the basic environmental
management principles and legal requirements remain the same. All mining must comply
with –
5.1 the requirements of the Approved Environmental Management Plan for a Mining
Permit, or an Environmental Management Programme for a Mining License;
5.6 the requirements of any community or industry agreements the operation may have
entered into.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Rehabilitation‟ and possible post-closure care and maintenance where it is suspected this
will be required.
5.7 Objectives of the programme with attention to land use and environment of the
neighbouring areas and to the proposed end-use of the site;
5.8 Sectors to be rehabilitated in successive stages including the timing of these stages,
or justification for delaying rehabilitation until operations are completed;
5.11 Intended removal or retention of the various services (water, power, telephone etc.)
and infrastructure elements (unnecessary buildings, foundations, roads, stockpile
areas and berms) on completion of operations, through to the disposal of waste and
the final site clean-up.
Aggregate and sand (includes gravel) mining may be one of the least- regulated of all
mining activities, however aggregate and sand commercial operations have to follow all
National and Provincial regulatory procedures but the informal borrow pits, municipal and
sand wetting operations don‟t seem to have to comply. Developers of buildings often “mine”
under the auspicious that they are not mining but building, the problem being that the
“mined” material is sold.
The mining permit applications for the 5Ha (hectares) don‟t require stringent rules where as
the formal operation has to comply to various standards.
Issues such as appropriate application forms, proof of right to mine the land, maps of the
vicinity and site and rehabilitation plans, a mining plan including plans for pollution control
and water stream protection, a rehabilitation plan, and a rehabilitation fund, all need to be
included in all mining activities.
NB:
The running of a proper commercial operation has various steps that have to be met:
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Once the proposed mine site is understood in terms of surface water drainage and
ground water conditions, site preparation can be initiated.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Where necessary, road surfaces should be gravelled if the base does not
already contain sufficient aggregate.
It is very important to only clear and grub acreage needed for the immediate term.
Clearing or grubbing too much land too early in the construction phase of the mining
operation will dramatically increase the potential for environmental impacts from
surface water runoff and will increase the cost to control runoff from the mining site.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
However, physical space limitations may limit the amount of overburden material that
may be stockpiled at any given time. The cost to strip the material, typically using a
trackhoe and haul truck, can outweigh the value of holding on to this material for
future use. Once mining operations has created a mine pit, concurrent rehabilitation
allows for much of the overburden material to be place back into the mine pit. This
negates or minimises the cost of hauling it an area of the mine property for temporary
storage.
During the stripping phase of the mining process, care should be taken to not affect or
disturb too great of an area such that surface runoff cannot be controlled effectively.
Such a case might allow an excessive build-up of silt or clay in ditches constructed to
control the surface water flow across the site. Normally, surface water flow is directed
to the pit to keep the water table high in extended periods of dry weather.
7. MINING PHASE
Requirements during this portion of the mining process include proper berming and/or
ditching of pump water from the dredge to the wash plant and back into the mining pit
to avoid unpermitted process water from potentially leaving the property.
Runoff from the stockpiles should be controlled by routing this water back to the open
pit. Rainfall runoff from these stockpiles should also be directed to the open pit.
After being transported to the processing plant, the wet sand and gravel (raw feed) is
stockpiled or emptied directly into a hopper, which typically is covered with a set of
parallel bars to screen trash or debris. From the hopper the material is transported to
fixed or vibrating scalping screens by gravity, belt conveyors, hydraulic pump, or
bucket elevators. The scalping screens separate the oversize material from the
smaller size reduction, to produce crushed aggregate or manufactured sand.
Crushing generally is carried out in one or two stages. Following crushing, the
material is returned to the screening operation for additional sizing.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
in order to remove clays and other deleterious material. After screening, the sized
gravel is transported to stockpiles, storage bins, or, in some cases, to crushers by belt
conveyors, bucket elevators, or screw conveyors. The sand is freed from the clay and
organic impurities by log washers or rotary scrubbers. After scrubbing, the sand
typically is sized by water classification. Wet and dry screening is rarely used to size
the sand. After classification, the sand is dewatered using screw, cyclones, or hydro
separators.
Fuel and oil storage and handling facilities should be located some distance from the
main sediment and wash water retention facilities. All such facilities should be
equipped with approved containment, monitoring, and collection systems. It is
recommended that fuel storage be done above ground. Runoff from adjacent
surfaces should be routed to a retention pond that can be monitored and cleaned in
the event of a spill.
After the leak is repaired, the discharged product should be recovered from the
secondary containment and used as intended, if possible, or disposed of in
accordance with current local or national regulations. If contaminated surface soils
are generated, they must be disposed of in accordance with current local or national
regulations.
Revision No.: 4 Page 13 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
8. POST-MINING PHASE
Soil characteristics need to be evaluated to help maintain soil stability and prevent
erosion. Some sites may require specific and detailed engineering plans, while others
should apply general guidelines to meet site stabilisation objectives. The following
guidelines may be used to ease the tasks of meeting site stabilisation objectives.
8.2 Slope stability: Cut and fill slopes should not exceed 2:1 to provide better stability.
Gentler slopes (3:1) are preferred to facilitate seeding efforts. Long slops should be
avoided to help prevent erosion and to allow access for seeding, mulching, and
maintenance.
8.3 Diversion: Construct diversion at tops of slope to divert runoff away from the slope
banks to a stable outlet.
8.4 Chutes: Construct aggregate lined chutes or equivalent to conduct concentrated flow
of water to stable outlets.
It is prudent to practice good soil conservation and seed bare ground during the post-
mining phase to aid in minimising and/or reducing the potential for storm water to
wash sediment loads from un-vegetated areas into nearby waterways. Natural
regeneration takes time and during that process much sediment could be washed
away as sheet, rill or gully erosion over that period.
If active re-vegetation is selected, seeds that are conducive to the season and type of
soil present should be used to vegetate any bare areas. Mulching (using hay or
erosion control blankets, for example) also aids in seed germination and helps
prevent or minimise sheet, rill and gully erosion.
Revision No.: 4 Page 14 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
The following guidelines apply to the open burning of trees, brush, grass, wood, and
any vegetation in the clearing of land, right-of-way maintenance operations, and
agricultural crop burning. This includes the open burning of structures and material
for fire training; open burning for management of forest and wildlife or disposal of a
fire hazard.
8.6.1 Prevailing winds during the burn should always be away from any city or
occupied residence likely to be affected by the smoke to the best extent
possible;
8.6.2 The amount of dirt in the material being burned should be minimised to
reduce smouldering;
8.6.3 Oils, rubber tyres, railroad ties, treated wood, and any other material creating
unreasonable amounts of smoke or air pollutants may not be burned;
8.6.4 No hazardous waste or material shall be burned;
8.6.5 Opening burning should be conducted between sunrise and before sunset.
This allows for good smoke dispersion;
8.6.6 Fuel should not be added outside the timeline listed above;
8.6.7 An open burn should be extinguished completely to ensure smouldering of
material does not persist;
8.6.7 Open burning should not obscure visibility or create a traffic hazard on any
public road or airport right of way;
8.6.8 The following entities should be notified of when and where the open burn
will occur: local fire department, municipality nearest the burn, South African
Police Services, and any military, commercial, or private airport or landing
strip that may be affected by the open burn. Many complaints and disputes
can be avoided by informing people ahead of time of the open burn. It is very
important to contact your local fire department. This will ensure that sufficient
personnel will be available in the event that control of the burn is lost;
8.6.9 Common sense precautions, such as having someone watch the fire until it
is extinguished and assuring smoke doesn‟t impact residences or impair
vehicular travel on highways should be followed.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
In either case 1 or 2 above, the haul road must be moved away from the
property line as soon as possible unless permission is obtained by the
adjacent property owner.
8.9.3 There shall be a 15 meter no disturbance buffer area for all other parcels not
listed above, unless the adjacent property owner provides a written
authorisation of reduced buffer. The 15 meter buffer shall apply to all
highways and the buffer area shall begin at the edge of the highway right-of-
way.
8.10.1 Equipment maintenance may take place at any time if done within an
enclosed structure or if maintenance is part of an extended hour petition.
8.10.2 Hours and days of operation may also be extended when an emergency
exists. An emergency is a short-term, unplanned and unexpected event
where an immediate need for borrow material exists in order to address a
significant threat to the public safety.
8.10.3 No operations may take place on Public holidays.
A borrow pit shall be used soley for operations directly related to a borrow pit. Any other
use shall require a conditional use approval from the DMR/Environmental Affairs.
It shall be the responsibility of the pit operator or owner to control activity within the pit area
and to clean up debris or other material left on site. If done in conjunction with a hot mix
operation, the recycling of asphalt may be done in a borrow pit. Storage of asphalt,
including concrete, is permitted in a general purpose or public works pit provided it is part of
an on-going recycling effort.
Revision No.: 4 Page 16 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
9.7.3 All erosion and sediment control measures must be approved by the
Department of Environment. The owner or operator shall maintain all such
practices until the pit area is permanently stabilised or reclaimed.
The control of borrow pits is not yet optimal. Commercial quarries are discarding suitable
material, which is being supplied by nearby borrow pits. The granting of commercial
licences does not consider density or cumulative impact.
10.1 The DMR, Environmental Agency like DEA, Water Affairs, and Municipalities have
the responsibility of prescribing standards and guidelines to prevent all forms of
environmental damage including sand and gravel borrow pits. This should be done
in consultation and harmonisation with formal Commercial Quarries and/or
Aspasa. It should also be done Nationally, Provincially and by Municipalities.
10.2 The Regulators need to ensure that gravel pits, borrow pits, construction pits and
municipal quarries adhere to guidelines and standards as outlined in the present
legislation. In the case of failure to adhere to the prescribed guidelines proposed
should therefore deny the contractor the right to mine.
10.3 An Integrated Environmental Assessment Management and Monitoring program
should be part of any gravel, borrow pit or other extraction operation and
encouraged at national, regional municipal and local levels. Assessment should be
used to predict possible environmental impacts and to encourage public
participation at the decision level. A mitigation and restoration strategy should be
included in any management programme. Monitoring must be used to determine if
the assessments were correct to detect environmental changes, and to support
future decisions.
10.4 Best Management Practices will be followed for the general investigation
measures for the borrow pit, gravel or municipal quarries:
10.5 Minimising the surface area of the borrow pit where possible;
10.6 Minimise rock and borrow pit cuts where possible;
10.7 Maintain the floor of the borrow pit slightly above the elevation of the surrounding
area to promote drainage to avoid creating quarry lakes and to prevent permanent
degradation in borrow pits;
10.8 Prevent erosion and sedimentation through appropriate control measures;
10.9 Protect archaeological resources
10.10 Maintain air quality through dust control/suppression;
10.11 Use progressive rehabilitation in closing borrow pits no longer than needed.
Revision No.: 4 Page 18 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
During the course of borrow pit excavations, operations should be planned in such a way
that the amount of work that will be necessary for the finishing off of the borrow pit is
reduced as far as possible. Indiscriminate excavation without due regard for the desired
final shape of the borrow pit should not be permitted and should be rectified immediately.
Ideally Closure Objectives should have been set as part of the Mining Plan. These
objectives would guide environmental management during the cessation of mining
operations and subsequent closure and determine the “legacy of what gets left behind”
pursuant to the abandonment of the site. At the point where closure is eminent, the Closure
Objective should be revisited and reviewed, and the measures that need to be
implemented to achieve these objectives should be confirmed as part of a
closure/rehabilitation process. It may be appropriate at this stage to revisit any potential
residual impacts and ensure that the identified measures are adequate to address these.
Yes, there are often circumstances where a Mining Plan may not have been developed for
a particular borrow pit, e.g. where the pit is a historic site, which has been abandoned, or
where the development and operation of the pit preceded the legal and good practice
requirements were not followed. In these circumstances, a Closure Plan would need to be
developed to identify the key Closure Objectives and highlight the remedial/rehabilitation
measures required to achieve these.
The first step in formulating a Closure Plan would be to undertake a risk assessment.
During the development of this Closure plan the key questions are “What mitigation
measures are required to leave the borrow pit in an acceptable state” and “What are
the potential residual risks and how should these be mitigated”.
The timing of rehabilitation is important, and rehabilitation of disturbed areas should ideally
be programmed to occur as soon as practically possible following the cessation of the work
in a specific area. The period between cessation of activities associated with the mining of
materials and the onset of rehabilitation for that area should ideally not exceed 1 month.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
In SA there are many borrow pits that have been left with no rehabilitation or measures
taken to secure the areas. Public safety has not been seen as an important issue in the
past and many animals and children have drowned in abandoned borrow pits.
16.1 Where the borrow pit is likely to impose a significant risk after rehabilitation, e.g.
dangerous slopes (steeper than 1 : 2 or unstable), not free draining, developed as
a farm dam, not visible etc., then the perimeter of the borrow pit, as defined by the
expropriation or landowner agreement, should be secured with permanent fencing.
16.2 Stock-proof fencing, in concert with appropriate signage, should be utilised as a
minimum and should be maintained in a satisfactory condition.
16.3 A gate should be provided to permit access to the site for the on-going monitoring
and management of the site rehabilitation.
16.4 Care should be taken not to damage existing fences and gates.
It is essential that site areas are cleaned up and returned to an acceptable state when an
operation is closed down.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
20.1 Areas not properly rehabilitated are an eye sore and therefore screening is
necessary to ensure acceptable and sustainable environmental areas are left
behind. Some requirements:
20.1.1 The most effective way to mitigate the visual impacts associated with a
borrow pit is via the effective implementation of the rehabilitation process,
and the attainment of stable slopes and acceptable vegetation.
20.1.2 For some sights rehabilitation may not be adequate to address the impact
on the visual aesthetics. Hence, consideration should be given to the
visual screening of sites that are unsightly, are highly visible or are located
in visually sensitive areas.
21. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE LAND ONCE THE CONTRACTORS HAVE LEFT AND
THE AREA HAS BEEN REHABILITATED?
It is often found that other operators or opportunist visit areas that have been mined to
continue with the removal of material. These situations are often than not controlled or
regulated and deteriorate into gaping holes.
21.1 Re-vegetation should not occur in any areas until all operations within those areas
have been complete.
21.2 Once re-vegetation, areas should be protected to prevent tramping and erosion.
21.3 No construction equipment, vehicles or unauthorised personnel should be allowed
onto areas that have been vegetated.
21.4 Only persons or equipment required for the preparation of areas, application of
fertilizer and spreading of topsoil should be allowed to operate on these areas.
21.5 Where rehabilitation sites are located within actively grazed areas, they should be
fenced.
21.6 Fencing should be removed once a sound vegetation cover has been achieved.
Revision No.: 4 Page 21 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
21.7 Any runnels, erosion channels or wash away developing after re-vegetation should
be backfilled and consolidated and the areas restored to a proper stable condition.
The erosion should not be allowed to develop on a large scale before effecting
repairs and all erosion damage should be repaired as soon as possible.
22. WHO IS RESPONSBILE FOR THE AREA ONCE OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED?
The licence/permit holder stay liable until a Closure Certificate has been issued for the site
by the DMR
The issue of financial provisions and applicability to road maintenance activities being
undertaken by Provinces has specifically been raised with DMR and the following has been
agreed:
23.1 Where the road maintenance is undertaken by an independent Contractor, since
the Contractor will sign a formal Contract with Province, financial provision for
closure or sudden cessation of work be provided for via the Contract Agreement.
The financial guarantees provided by the Contractor would also be available for
any remedial work. Given the scale of mining activities associated with borrow pits,
it is anticipated that this would be more than adequate to meet the remedial
requirements.
24.2 Best management practices will employ the following general mitigation measures
for the borrow pits:
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
25.1 Introduction
The scope of this audit document is designed to cover the implementation of safety
standards associated with the management of all borrow pit operations.
Where, in the intent, the word “verify” is used, this means that it is a regulatory
requirement, which is mandatory and has to be complied with. Where, in the
intent, the word, “ensure” is used, it is not a mandatory requirement, but it does set
out a recommended safe method which, if followed, should minimise the potential
for an adverse incident to take place.
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
25.10 Workshop
1. A workshop facility is provided for the
maintenance of fixed and mobile plant.
2. The facility is appropriate for the types of
tasks undertaken.
3. The workshop has adequate facilities for
the stable jacking of mobile equipment.
4. Proper material handling and support
equipment is provided for the tasks
undertaken.
5. Adequate lighting is available for work to
be carried out safely at the workshop.
6. The workshop facility is maintained in a
tidy condition.
7. Signs are provided to warn of possible
eye, hearing and other safety hazards.
8. Fire control equipment is available at the
workshop.
9. Machinery is maintained on a regular
basis.
10. Gas cylinders are restrained.
11. Gas hoses and gauges are free from
damage.
Revision No.: 4 Page 26 of 27
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
Revision Date: 08/11/2013 File ID: ASPASA – BORROW PITS – REV 4 – 08 NOVEMBER 2013
This manual to be applicable to all Borrow Pits Nationally, Regionally and by Municipalities,
Government Departments, Provincial Departments and Municipalities.