IN

NTERNA
ATIONA
AL HYD
DROGRA
APHIC ORGAN
O NIZATIO
ON

MA
ANU
UAL
L ON
O
H DRO
HYD OGR
RAP
PHYY
Pub
blication M-13
M

1st Edition
n
M 2005
May 5

PUBL
LISHED BY
Y THE

INTERNA
ATIONAL
L HYDROG
GRAPHIC BUREAU

MONACO
IN
NTERNA
ATIONA
AL HYD
DROGRA
APHIC ORGAN
O NIZATIO
ON

MA
ANU
UAL
L ON
O
H DRO
HYD OGR
RAP
PHYY
Pub
blication M-13
M

1st Editio
on
M 200
May 05

Puublished by the
t
International Hydrograp phic Bureau
4, Quai
Q Antoinee 1er
B 445 - MC
B.P. C 98011 MO ONACO Cedeex
Princcipauté de Monaco
Telefaxx: (377) 93 10 81 40
E-mmail: info@ihhb.mc
Web: www.iho.sh hom.fr
 i

PREFACE

The IHO Manual on Hydrography general objective is to provide knowledge on the concepts involved in
hydrography as well as guidance to plan and execute hydrographic surveys. The Manual is considered to
be a professional guide for hydrographic surveyors and a tool for teachers and students involved in
hydrographic courses or programs.

The preparation of this Manual started after the majority of IHO Member States (MS) responded in favour
of proceeding with a project that could result in a Hydrographic Manual (1999). The IHB proposed then
the establishment of a Working Group that met for the first time at the IHB premises, 20-22 June 2001,
where the Table of Contents was agreed; Team Leaders were identified to deal with specific subjects,
being responsible for the compilation of experts’ contributions, and a work program was defined. In 2004
a second meeting took place to review the result obtained and decide on a draft version of the Manual.
After collecting comments from MS, the final version was prepared and the IHO Manual on Hydrography
was published.

The Manual is considered to be a worthy product that contributes to the mission of the IHO, whose
objectives are:

• The co-ordination of the activities of national hydrographic offices;

• The greatest possible uniformity in nautical charts and documents;
• The adoption of reliable and efficient methods of carrying out and exploiting hydrographic
surveys;
• The development of the sciences in the field of hydrography and the techniques employed in
descriptive oceanography.

It has to be acknowledged that several Hydrographic Offices (HO) have made great efforts in preparing
and keeping up to date their version of a Hydrographic Manual, almost since their establishment, but the
resources, both, in time and manpower required for this activity have precluded several HOs from
continuing this practice, thus agreeing in the need to co-operate and co-ordinate the efforts for the
preparation of an IHO Hydrographic Manual. A Manual that could be useful to everybody, containing
specific aspects on hydrography and other matter only in general terms, as they are much more
thoroughly covered in existing textbooks which refer to them in considerably greater detail.

The content of this Manual is divided into seven chapters:

• Chapter 1 refers to the principles of hydrographic surveying, including its specifications;

• Chapter 2 refers to positioning;
• Chapter 3 to refers to depth determination, including both the principles and techniques used;
• Chapter 4 provides information on sea floor classification and object detection;
• Chapter 5 refers in particular to water levels and flow;
• Chapter 6 is devoted to topographic surveying applied to hydrography;
• Chapter 7 provides, in a structured way, complete details on hydrographic practice;
• Annexes with Acronyms, Bibliography and other relevant information.

M-13
 ii

It is the IHB responsibility to keep this Manual up dated, following inputs from MS and other
organisations who are encouraged to provide the IHB with relevant information in this regard. If needed,
the IHB will request the advice of the FIG/IHO/ICA International Advisory Board on Standards of
Competence for Hydrographic Surveyors and Nautical Cartographers, on the best way to include new
material and/or organise the relevant chapter(s).

The IHB will keep the digital version of this Manual on the IHO web page and will print hard copies on
demand. With the assistance of readers and of Member States, the IHB will aim to maintain this
publication on a regular basis..

The IHB is particularly grateful to Admiral Ritchie of the United Kingdom for his encouragement and
support in writing the Introduction to this Manual.

The IHB would like to thank the following principal authors for their efforts in preparing the final text,
whilst acknowledging that they were ably assisted by many others who remain unnamed:

Capt Muhammad ZAFARYAB (Pakistan), Cdr Lamberto LAMBERTI (Italy), Lt Antonio DI

LIETO (Italy), Lt Cdr Paul LAWRENCE (UK), Lt Cdr Fernando ARTILHEIRO (Portugal), Lt Cdr Peter
JOHNSON (Australia), Cdr Jerry MILLS (USA), Mr Stephen GILL (USA), Mr Federico
MAYER (Argentina), Mr Hector SALGADO (Argentina), Lt Cdr Bob WILSON (UK) and Lt Cdr David
WYATT (UK).

__________

M-13
 iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................i

INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................. 1
Brief history of hydrography.................................................................................................................. 1
Importance of hydrography..................................................................................................................... 2
Fields of competence associated with hydrography................................................................................ 3

CHAPTER 1 “PRINCIPLES OF HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING” ........................................... 7

1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7
2. Hydrographic Surveying ......................................................................................................... 8
2.1 Survey Specifications ................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Survey Planning .......................................................................................................... 11
2.3 Data Gathering ............................................................................................................ 13
2.4 Data Processing........................................................................................................... 13
2.5 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................. 15
2.6 Data Quality ................................................................................................................ 15
2.7 Data Quality - Presentation ......................................................................................... 16
2.7.1 Chart Reliability Diagrams ............................................................................ 16
2.7.2 Zone of Confidence (ZOC) ............................................................................ 17
2.8 Data Production .......................................................................................................... 21
2.9 Nautical Information System (NIS) ............................................................................ 22
2.9.1 Compilation Process ................................................................................... 24
2.9.2 Presentation ................................................................................................ 26

Annex A – Acronyums .................................................................................................................... 29

References .................................................................................................................... 30
URL Addresses .................................................................................................................... 31
Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 32

CHAPTER 2 “POSITIONING” ....................................................................................................... 33

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 33
2. Principles of Positioning ........................................................................................................ 33
The Earth 33
2.1.1 The Ellipsoid .............................................................................................. 34
2.1.2 The Local Sphere ........................................................................................ 35
2.1.3 The Geoid ................................................................................................... 36
2.2 Datum .................................................................................................................... 36
2.2.1 Horizontal Datum ....................................................................................... 37
2.2.2 Type of Datum ............................................................................................ 38
2.2.3 Datum Transformation ............................................................................... 39
2.2.4 Vertical Datum ........................................................................................... 41
2.3 Coordinates Systems .................................................................................................. 43
2.4 Principles of Cartography ........................................................................................... 43
2.5 Projections .................................................................................................................. 45
2.5.1 Perspective (or geometric) projections ....................................................... 45
2.5.2 Conic projections ........................................................................................ 45
2.5.3 Cylindrical projections ............................................................................... 45

M-13
 iv

2.5.4 Representations........................................................................................... 46
2.5.5 Universal Transverse Mercator projection ................................................. 48
3. Horizontal Control Methods ................................................................................................ 49
3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 49
3.2 Classic Method ........................................................................................................... 49
3.2.1 Triangulation .............................................................................................. 49
3.2.2 Trilateration ................................................................................................ 54
3.3 Mixed method ............................................................................................................. 55
3.3.1 Traverse ...................................................................................................... 55
3.3.2 Not Oriented Open Traverse....................................................................... 57
3.3.3 Oriented Open Traverse.............................................................................. 58
3.3.4 Not Oriented Closed Traverse .................................................................... 60
3.4 Photogrammetry method............................................................................................. 62
3.4.1 Aerophotogrammetry.................................................................................. 63
3.5 Intervisibility of Geodetic Stations ............................................................................. 66
4. Vertical Control Methods......................................................................................................68
4.1 Geometric leveling ...................................................................................................... 68
4.1.1 Principles and specifications ...................................................................... 68
4.1.2 Measurements and quality control .............................................................. 70
4.1.3 Sources of error .......................................................................................... 70
4.1.4 Computation and compensation ................................................................. 70
4.2 Trigonometric levelling .............................................................................................. 72
4.2.1 Principles and specifications ...................................................................... 72
4.2.2 Correction for sphericity............................................................................. 73
4.2.3 Correction for refraction ............................................................................. 74
4.2.4 Correction of height .................................................................................... 75
4.2.5 Sources of error .......................................................................................... 75
4.2.6 Computation and Compensation ................................................................ 76
4.3 Altimetry with GPS .................................................................................................... 77
5. Instruments used to establish Horizontal and Vertical Control ........................................ 78
5.1 GNSS Receiver (GPS) ................................................................................................ 78
5.2 Electronic instruments ................................................................................................ 78
5.2.1 Electronic Distance Measuring of phase .................................................... 78
5.2.2 Electronic Distance Measuring of impulses ............................................... 80
5.2.3 Precision and range of EDM ...................................................................... 82
5.2.4 Total stations .............................................................................................. 83
5.3 Optic instruments ........................................................................................................ 83
5.3.1 Marine sextant (Circle to reflection) .......................................................... 83
5.3.2 Theodolites ................................................................................................. 84
5.3.3 Levelling instruments (Levels) and Stadia ................................................. 86
6. Positioning Methods (Techniques of Positioning) ............................................................... 87
6.1 GNSS (GPS) ............................................................................................................... 87
Description of Global Positioning System (GPS) .................................................................... 87
Principles of positioning .......................................................................................................... 89
Performances of the system and sources of error .................................................................... 91
GPS tracking and signal acquisition techniques ...................................................................... 92
DGPS 94
RTK 95
Treatment of the data ............................................................................................................... 96
6.2 Electromagnetic .......................................................................................................... 98
6.2.1 Accuracy in the position determination ...................................................... 99
6.2.2 Lines of position (LOPs) .......................................................................... 100

M-13
 v

6.2.3 Circular lines of position (CLOPs) ........................................................... 100

6.2.4 Hyperbolic lines of position (HLOPs) ...................................................... 101
6.2.5 Determination methods of electromagnetic wave lines of position ......... 101
(EW LOPs) ............................................................................................. 101
6.2.6 Measures of differences of phase ............................................................. 101
6.2.7 Measure of difference of time .................................................................. 103
6.3 Acoustic Systems ...................................................................................................... 103
6.3.1 Acoustic Techniques................................................................................. 104
6.3.2 Principles of Measurement ....................................................................... 108
6.3.3 Accuracy and errors sources ..................................................................... 111
6.4 Optical Techniques ................................................................................................... 112
6.4.1 Tag Line Positioning (Cable sounding) .................................................... 113
6.4.2 Sextant resection Positioning (Inverse intersection)................................. 113
6.4.3 Triangulation/intersection Positioning (Direct intersection) .................... 113
6.4.4 Range-Azilmuth Positioning (Mixed system optic and
electromagnetic) ..................................................................................... 113

References .................................................................................................................. 114

Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 116

CHAPTER 3 “DEPTH DETERMINATION” ............................................................................... 119

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 119
2. Acoustic and Motion Sensors Fundamentals..................................................................... 120
2.1 Sea water acoustic waves and physical characteristics ............................................. 120
Acoustic Field 120
Sonar Equation 121
Temperature 126
Salinity 126
Pressure 126
Density 126
2.2 Salinity, Temperature and Sound Velocity Determination ...................................... 127
2.2.1 Instrumentation ......................................................................................... 127
2.2.2 Instrument operation ................................................................................. 127
2.2.3 Data recording and processing ................................................................. 128
2.2.4 Sound velocity computation ..................................................................... 128
2.3 Sea water sound propagation .................................................................................... 128
2.3.1 Attenuation ............................................................................................... 128
2.3.2 Refraction and reflection .......................................................................... 129
2.4 Acoustic parameters ..................................................................................................130
2.4.1 Frequency ................................................................................................. 130
2.4.2 Band width................................................................................................ 131
2.4.3 Pulse length .............................................................................................. 131
3. Motion Sensors .................................................................................................................. 132
3.1 Principles of operation .............................................................................................. 133
3.1.1 Inertial sensors .......................................................................................... 133
3.1.2 Inertial sensors with the integration of GPS information ......................... 133
3.2 Roll, pitch and heave measurement .......................................................................... 133
3.3 Heading .................................................................................................................. 134
3.4 Accuracy of measurement......................................................................................... 134
4. Transducers .................................................................................................................. 135
4.1 Classification with Regard to Operation ................................................................... 135
4.1.1 Magnetostrictive .......................................................................................... 135

M-13
 vi

4.1.2 Piezoelectric ................................................................................................. 135

4.1.3 Electrostrictive ............................................................................................. 136
4.2 Beam width ............................................................................................................... 136
4.3 Classification with Regard to Beam ......................................................................... 143
4.3.1 Single Beam ................................................................................................. 143
4.3.2 Multibeam .................................................................................................... 144
4.4 Classification with Regard to installation ................................................................. 144
4.4.1 Keel mounted ............................................................................................... 145
4.4.2 Towed .......................................................................................................... 145
4.4.3 Portable ........................................................................................................ 145
4.5 Coverage ................................................................................................................... 147
5. Acoustic Systems .................................................................................................................. 148
5.1 Single beam echo sounders ....................................................................................... 148
5.1.1 Principles of operation .............................................................................. 148
5.1.2 Installation and calibration ....................................................................... 152
5.1.3 Operation and data recording ................................................................... 154
5.1.4 Source of errors and quality control techniques ....................................... 154
5.2 Swath Systems .......................................................................................................... 166
5.2.1 Multibeam systems ................................................................................... 166
5.2.2 Interferometric sonars ............................................................................... 180
6. Non acoustic systems............................................................................................................ 181
6.1 Airborne Laser Systems ............................................................................................ 181
6.1.1 Principles of operation .............................................................................. 181
6.1.2 Capabilities and limitations ...................................................................... 183
6.2 Airborne Electromagnetic Systems........................................................................... 183
6.2.1 Principles of operation .............................................................................. 184
6.2.2 Capabilities and limitations ...................................................................... 184
6.3 Remote Sensing ........................................................................................................ 184
6.3.1 Photobathymetry....................................................................................... 185
6.3.2 Others ....................................................................................................... 185
6.4 Mechanic Systems .................................................................................................... 186
6.4.1 Lead Line and sounding pole.................................................................... 186
6.4.2 Bar sweep ................................................................................................. 187
6.4.3 Wire sweep ............................................................................................... 188

References .................................................................................................................. 189

Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 191

Annex A Reference and Coordinate Systems ....................................................................... 195

CHAPTER 4 “SEAFLOOR CLASSIFICATION AND FEATURE DETECTION” ................. 199

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 199
2. Seafloor Feature Detection .................................................................................................. 199
2.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 199
2.2 Standards .................................................................................................................. 199
2.2.2 IHO S-44 – Minimum Standards for Hydrographic Surveys ................... 199
2.2.3 IHO S-57 – Transfer Standards for Digital Hydrographic Data ............... 200
2.2.4 Detection of Hazardous Features .............................................................. 201
2.2.5 Military Requirements .............................................................................. 202
2.2.6 Reporting Features.................................................................................... 202
2.3 Methods of feature detection .................................................................................... 202
2.3.1 Overview .................................................................................................. 202

M-13
 vii

2.3.2 Sidescan Sonar (SSS) ............................................................................... 203

2.3.3 Theoretical Considerations ....................................................................... 204
2.3.4 Operational Constraints ............................................................................ 206
2.3.5 Distortions of Sonar Records .................................................................... 208
2.3.6 Feature Detection...................................................................................... 210
2.3.7 Calculation of Speed of Advance (SOA).................................................. 212
2.3.8 Track-Keping Errors ................................................................................. 214
2.3.9 Practical use of Sidescan Sonar ................................................................ 214
2.3.10 Positions Errors of Sonar Contacts ........................................................... 218
2.3.11 Plotting and Measurements from Sonar Records ..................................... 219
2.3.12 Multibeam Echosounders (MBES) ........................................................... 220
2.3.13 Considerations when using MBES ........................................................... 221
2.3.14 Magnetometer ........................................................................................... 222
2.3.15 Other Methods of Feature Detection ........................................................ 223
2.3.16 Obtaining Definitive Least Depth over a Feature ..................................... 223
2.3.17 Echosounder Least Depth ......................................................................... 224
2.3.18 Use of Divers ............................................................................................ 224
2.3.19 Other Methods .......................................................................................... 225
2.3.20 Methods of Wire Sweeping Wrecks ......................................................... 225
2.4 Sidescan Sonar records ............................................................................................. 226
2.4.2 Wreck Records ......................................................................................... 227
2.4.3 Sonar Coverage Records .......................................................................... 228
3. Seafloor Characterisation ................................................................................................... 230
3.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 230
3.1.2 Seafloor Characterisation Models ............................................................ 231
3.1.3 Seafloor Samples ...................................................................................... 232
3.1.4 Nature of the Seafloor............................................................................... 232
3.1.5 Classifying Samples ................................................................................. 233
3.1.6 Methods of Obtaining Seafloor Samples .................................................. 234
3.1.7 Seafloor Sample Records.......................................................................... 236
3.2 Classification Sensors ............................................................................................... 236
3.3 Classification - Theory.............................................................................................. 237
3.3.2 Backscatter Imagery ................................................................................. 237
3.3.3 Sidescan Registration ............................................................................... 238
3.3.4 Mosaicing ................................................................................................. 238
3.3.5 Classification - General ............................................................................ 239
3.3.6 RoxAnn..................................................................................................... 240
3.3.7 Classification using MBES ....................................................................... 241
3.3.8 Textural Mapping ..................................................................................... 242
3.3.9 Power Spectra ........................................................................................... 242
3.3.10 Grey level Co-occurrence Matrices .......................................................... 243
3.3.11 Echo Amplitude Peak Probality Density Function ................................... 243
3.3.12 Angular Dependence ................................................................................ 244
3.3.13 Acoustic Backscatter Data Interpretation ................................................. 245
3.3.14 Military Classification Models ................................................................. 246

References ..................................................................................................................252

CHAPTER 5 “WATER LEVELS AND FLOW” ......................................................................... 253

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 253
2. Tides and Water Levels ....................................................................................................... 253
2.1 Principles of Tides and Water Levels ....................................................................... 253

M-13
 viii

2.1.1 Astronomical Tide Producing Forces ....................................................... 253

2.1.2 Tidal Characteristics ................................................................................. 258
2.1.3 Non-Tidal Water Level Variations ........................................................... 266
2.1.4 Tide and Water Level Datums .................................................................. 267
2.1.5 Harmonis Analysis and Tide Prediction ................................................... 268
2.2 Operational Support Functions ................................................................................. 274
2.2.1 Error Budget Considerations .................................................................... 275
2.2.2 Tide and Water Level Requirement Planning .......................................... 275
2.2.3 Preliminary Tide and Water Level Zoning ............................................... 277
2.2.4 Control Water Level Station Operation .................................................... 279
2.2.5 Supplemental Water Level Station Requirements .................................... 279
2.2.6 Data Processing and Tabulation ............................................................... 284
2.2.7 Computation of Tidal Datums .................................................................. 287
2.2.8 Final Zoning and Tide Reducers .............................................................. 290
2.2.9 Using Kinematic GPS for Vertical Control .............................................. 292
3. Water Level Flow and Tidal Currents ............................................................................... 293
3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 293
3.2 Principles of Tidal Currents ...................................................................................... 293
3.3 Measurements of Currents ........................................................................................ 295
3.4 Tidal Current Prediction ........................................................................................... 297

References ............................................................................................................................... 299

CHAPTER 6 “TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING” .......................................................................... 301

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 301
2. Topography, Coastline Delineation and Aids to Navigation Positioning ........................ 302
2.1 Specifications ............................................................................................................ 302
2.2 Positioning Methods and Accuacies ......................................................................... 303
GNSS 303
Triangulation 307
Traverse 311
Intersection and Resection319
Usual Algorithms 323
Levelling and its Errors 330
2.3 Coastal and Harbour Ground Surveys ...................................................................... 331
2.3.1 Application of Direct Topographic Methods ............................................ 331
2.3.2 Density of points to be surveyed .............................................................. 331
2.3.3 Applicable Methods.................................................................................. 331
2.3.4 Relief Representation ............................................................................... 332
3. Remote Sensing .................................................................................................................... 333
3.1 Photogrammetry........................................................................................................ 334
3.1.1 Principles and applications of aerial photographs .................................... 335
3.1.2 Aerial Photograph acquisition elements ................................................... 337
3.1.3 Flight Planning ......................................................................................... 338
3.1.4 Restitution................................................................................................. 340
3.1.5 Aerotriangulation ...................................................................................... 341
3.1.6 Ground control.......................................................................................... 344
3.1.7 Stereo plotter generalities. Digital processing .......................................... 345
3.1.8 Photo interpretation .................................................................................. 346
3.2 Not Photogrammetric Remote Sensing Imagery ...................................................... 347
Satellite and sensors for earth Resources Remote Sensing ................................................................. 348
Main Remote Sensing Systems ........................................................................................................... 352

M-13
 ix

Image Structure and Support .............................................................................................................. 358

Interpretation and Processing Fundamentals ...................................................................................... 360
Image preprocessing and complementary data ...................................................................................362
Image processing 364
Altimetry 372
Cartographic application 376

Acronyms .................................................................................................................. 381

References .................................................................................................................. 383
Web sites .................................................................................................................. 386
Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 389

Annex A Algorithms for the Transverse Mercator Representation ......................................... 391

Annex B Commercial Equipment Examples .............................................................................. 405

CHAPTER 7 “HYDROGRAPHIC PRACTICE” ......................................................................... 409

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 409
2. Hydrographic Survey Planning .......................................................................................... 409
2.1 The Hydrographic Project ......................................................................................... 409
2.2 Assessment of the Survey Task ................................................................................ 410
2.3 Detailed Survey Planning ......................................................................................... 412
2.4 Horizontal Control .................................................................................................... 412
2.5 Vertical Control ........................................................................................................412
2.6 Tidal Streams ............................................................................................................413
2.7 Sounding ................................................................................................................... 413
2.8 Sida Scan Sonar ........................................................................................................ 414
2.9 Seabed Sampling....................................................................................................... 414
2.10 Coastline Delineation, Conspicuous Objects and Topography ................................. 415
2.11 Ancillary Observations ............................................................................................. 415
2.12 Surveying Team Organisation .................................................................................. 415
2.13 Compilation and Checking of Data........................................................................... 416
2.14 Data Rendering Requirements .................................................................................. 416
2.15 Operation Programme Development ........................................................................ 417
2.16 Operation Duration and Cost Estimates .................................................................... 417
2.17 Liaison with Outside Authorities .............................................................................. 417
3. Survey Reconnaissance........................................................................................................ 418
3.1 General Reconnaissance ........................................................................................... 418
3.2 The Geodetic Reconnaissance .................................................................................. 418
3.3 The Tidal Reconnaissance ........................................................................................ 419
4. Data Acquisitionl.................................................................................................................. 419
4.1 Horizontal Control and Calibration .......................................................................... 420
4.1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 420
4.1.2 Horizontal Control Ashore ....................................................................... 420
4.1.3 Horizontal Control at Sea ......................................................................... 421
4.1.4 Field Preparation ...................................................................................... 422
4.1.5 Alignment and Calibration of Positioning Systems.................................. 424
4.1.6 Horizontal Control Methods and Equipment ............................................ 425
4.2 Vertical Control and Calibration ............................................................................... 451
4.2.1 General Description .................................................................................. 451
4.2.2 Tidal Modelling for RTK Surveys............................................................ 452
4.3 Environmental Observations ..................................................................................... 456
4.4 Line Guidance ........................................................................................................... 457

M-13
 x

4.5 Check Lines .............................................................................................................. 461

4.6 Main Lines ................................................................................................................ 461
4.7 Inter-lines and Investigations .................................................................................... 463
4.8 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations...................................................................... 464
5. Coastline Delineation ........................................................................................................... 466
5.1 Coastlining General .................................................................................................. 466
5.2 Coastal Details Required .......................................................................................... 466
5.3 Detail of Concern to the Mariner .............................................................................. 467
5.4 Topography ............................................................................................................... 467
5.5 Delineation of the Drying Line ................................................................................. 468
5.6 Heights of Land Features .......................................................................................... 468
5.7 Charting the Foreshore.............................................................................................. 468
5.8 Coastline Overlay ..................................................................................................... 469
5.9 Use of Air Photo Plots .............................................................................................. 469
5.10 Coastlining Methods ................................................................................................. 470
5.11 Plotting the Coastline ................................................................................................ 471
5.12 Coastline Delineation Report .................................................................................... 471
6. Data Processing .................................................................................................................... 472
6.1 Bathymetric ............................................................................................................... 472
6.2 Seafloor Characterisation .......................................................................................... 472
6.3 Feature Detection ...................................................................................................... 474
6.4 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations...................................................................... 475
6.5 Compliance with the Plan ......................................................................................... 475
7. Data Rendering .................................................................................................................... 476
7.1 The Report of Survey ................................................................................................ 476
7.2 Data Requirement .................................................................................................... 476
7.3 Data Format and Density .......................................................................................... 476
7.4 Media Requirement................................................................................................... 477

References .................................................................................................................................. 478

Bibliography .................................................................................................................................. 480

Appendix 1 – Survey Planning and Estimation Guide ................................................................ 483

Appendix 2 – Table 1 – Horizontal Positioning Systems and Selection Criteria ...................... 487
Appendix 3 – Table 2 – Bandwith Classification of Electronic Positioning Systems
used in Hydrographic Surveying ......................................................................... 489
Table 3 – Field Application of Electronic Positioning Systems used
in Hydrographic Surveying.................................................................................. 489
Appendix 4 - System Diagrams..................................................................................................... 491
Appendix 5 - Specimen Report of Survey .................................................................................... 501

__________

M-13
 1

INTRODUCTION

BRIEF HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPHY

The oldest navigational chart known today is the Carte Pisane, so named as it was bought in 1829 from a
Pisan family by the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. It was drawn on an animal skin towards the end of
the 13thC, probably in Genoa where a school of marine cartography had been established; there was a
similar school in Venice, while a third school was developed on the isle of Majorca. Known as
‘portolans’ the charts produced by each of these schools were similar in style and content. The most
striking feature was networks of interconnecting rhumb lines emanating from compass roses representing
32 winds directions, each one of which could be used with dividers to set a ship’s course. The entire
Mediterranean coastline was depicted, the coastal names shown on the land leaving the sea area clear for
track plotting. There were a few symbols including the cross for submerged rock but no depth soundings.

By the 15thC Portuguese and Spanish portolans enabled Mediterranean seamen to sail to southern England
and Flanders to load wool.

For generations the northern seamen had navigated from one headline to another using written directions
and soundings handed down from their forebears, a method of pilotage known as ‘caping the ship’. With
the development of printing Pierre Garcie of Rouen was the first to publish caping information in his
‘Routier de la Mer’, which he illustrated with simple woodcut coastal views.

Cornelius Anthonisz, a draughtsman of Amsterdam realised that woodcut blocks could be used to print
charts on paper, his first being his ‘Karte van Ostland’ of the Baltic and North Seas. Whilst adopting
rhumb lines and other portolan features, he used Ptolomy’s projection which had recently been
rediscovered in Constantinople.

Anthonisz had shown the way but it was Lucas Janszoon Waghenaer of Enkhuizen in Holland who, forty
years on, printed paper charts from copper plate engravings. For many years he had travelled widely as a
sea pilot gathering hydrographic information and when he came ashore at the age of 49 he enlisted fellow
mariners to supply him with such material for compiling his charts. In 1584 Waghenaer published his
great atlas ‘Spieghel der Zeevaerdt’ (Mirror of the Sea) containing 45 charts covering the European coasts
from Norway to the Strait of Gibraltar. He introduced many new features such as coastal recognition
profiles behind the coastlines; reducing the distances between harbours so that their approaches could be
shown on a larger scale; the introduction of symbols for buoys, beacons, church spires etc. and soundings
reduced to their depth at half tide.

Waghenaer had made the great breakthrough in producing a paper chart designed by a seaman for
seamen. He had a number of Dutch followers so that, for over 100 years, Dutch charts were widely
available, even of British waters; eventually King Charles decided that the whole of Britain’s coasts and
harbours should be surveyed.

For this massive task he selected a naval officer named Greenville Collins, granted him the title
‘Hydrographer to the King’ and provided him with the yacht Merlin. The work began in 1681 and took
eleven years.

M-13
 2

There was no general topographic map of the Kingdom to which Collins could relate his charts, nor did
he have any method of finding his longitude and only the quadrant to assess his latitude; his soundings
reduced to low water were fixed by compass bearings of shore marks which in turn were fixed by
compass and measuring chain. In 1693 the resulting charts were published in an atlas entitled ‘Great
Britain’s Coasting Pilot’, which contained 47 charts and 30 pages of tide tables, sailing directions and
coastal views. Precisely engraved, the charts included soundings and leading lines for harbour entry etc.
The Pilot appealed to British seamen, a further twenty editions being published during the next hundred
years.

During the 16thC a school of hydrography was formed in Dieppe by the many sea pilots who sailed to
distant shores. In 1661 Jean Baptiste Colbert became Chief Minister to Louis XIV and among his many
tasks was that of revitalising the French Navy. He not only took over the Dieppe school but established
similar hydrographic centres in a number of other French ports. This enabled him to have surveys made of
the whole French coastline, every chart being directly connected to the national triangulation established
by the Cassini dynasty.

Colbert’s cadre of hydrographers were working in New France and the mass of material coming from
Quebec led to the establishment in Paris of the ‘Dépôt Général des Cartes et Plans’, now recognised as the
first national Hydrographic Office. Denmark was the next nation to establish a Hydrographic Office,
followed closely by the British in 1795; a further twenty or so countries established such offices in 19thC.

About 1775 two British surveyors, Murdoch Mackenzie and his nephew of the same name were largely
responsible for the invention of the station pointers, a device with which a vessel’s position could be
precisely plotted by the observation of two horizontal angles between three fixed marks onshore. This
was a major technical advance which revolutionised sea surveying throughout the 19thC during which the
demands for navigational charts both for war and peace increased dramatically.

Even before World War I a number of national Hydrographers were considering how international co-
operation could lead to the exchange of and the standardisation in chart design. With the end of the War
the British and French Hydrographers jointly called for an international Conference at which delegates
from 22 countries gathered in London in June 1919. Many Resolutions were adopted by the Conference
concerning chart standardisation and finally a Resolution to form an International Hydrographic Office
with three Directors.

H.S.H. Prince Albert I of Monaco, who had been kept in touch with the Proceedings of the Conference,
generously agreed to provide a building in the Principality to house the Bureau where it remains.

The history of hydrography during the 20thC, during which there have been many technical developments,
can be followed in the 75th Anniversary Commemorative Issue of the International Hydrographic Review
dated March 1997.

IMPORTANCE OF HYDROGRAPHY

Firstly it is necessary to consider the IHO definition of Hydrography, which stands as follows:

That branch of applied sciences which deals with the measurement and description of the features
of the seas and coastal areas for the primary purpose of navigation and all other marine purposes
and activities, including –inter alia- offshore activities, research, protection of the environment,
and prediction services. (IHO Pub. S-32)

M-13
 3

Therefore, the development of a National Maritime Policy requires a well developed capability to conduct
all these activities which will allow the obtaining of basic knowledge of the geographical, geological and
geophysical features of the seabed and coast, as well the currents, tides and certain physical properties of
the sea water; all of this data must then be properly processed so that the nature of the sea bottom, its
geographical relationship with the land and the characteristics and dynamics of the ocean can be
accurately depicted in all zones of national shipping. In brief, Hydrography, as defined, is the key to
progress on all maritime activities, normally of great national economic importance.

To adequately address areas of safe and efficient operation of maritime traffic control; coastal zone
management; exploration and exploitation of marine resources; environmental protection and maritime
defence, it is necessary to create a Hydrographic Service. The Hydrographic Service, through systematic
data collection carried out on the coast and at sea, produces and disseminates information in support of
maritime navigation safety and marine environment preservation, defence and exploitation.

To adequately address areas such as:

• Safe and efficient operation of maritime traffic control;

• Coastal Zone Management;
• Exploration and Exploitation of Marine Resources;
• Environmental Protection;
• Maritime Defence.

It is necessary to create a Hydrographic Service. The Hydrographic Service, through systematic data
collection carried out on the coast and at sea, produces and disseminates information in support of
maritime navigation safety and marine environment preservation, defence and exploitation.

FIELDS OF COMPETENCE ASSOCIATED WITH HYDROGRAPHY

Maritime Transport

More than 80% of international trade in the world is carried by sea. Maritime commerce is a basic
element for a nation's economy. Many areas and ports in the world do not have accurate nor adequate
nautical chart coverage. Modern nautical charts are required for safe navigation through a country's
waters and along coasts and to enter its ports. A lack of adequate nautical charts prevents the
development of maritime trade in the waters and ports of the concerned nations.

The shipping industry needs efficiency and safety. Poorly charted areas and the lack of information can
cause voyages to be longer than necessary, and may prevent the optimum loading of ships, thus increasing
costs. The saving of time and money resulting from the use of shorter and deeper routes and the
possibility to use larger ships or load ships more deeply may produce important economies for national
industry and commerce. It is also very important to note that the SOLAS Convention Chapter V
considers a ship unseaworthy if it does not carry up-to-date charts necessary for the intended voyage.

A solution to these problems would not be possible without the quality maps and charts produced and
continually updated and distributed by a Hydrographic Service. These charts, produced by means of
modern hydrographic surveys, are required to enable the larger ships of today to navigate through national
waters and enter ports the access to which was formerly insecure and therefore are essential tools for the
creation of coastal nations' incomes.

M-13
 4

Modern charts also provide information required to create the routeing systems established by
international conventions and to meet the economic interests of the coastal state.

Coastal Zone Management

Adequate coastal zone management includes items such as construction of new ports and the maintenance
and development of existing ones; dredging operations for the maintenance of charted depths and for the
establishment, monitoring and improvement of channels; control of coastal erosion; land reclamation
from the sea; establishment and monitoring of dumping grounds for industrial waste; extraction of
mineral deposits; aquacultural activities; transportation and public works projects including construction
of near shore infrastructure.

Precise large-scale surveys provide the primary data essential for projects involving all items mentioned
above. Due to the rapid changes to which shorelines are subject, these surveys must be updated with the
frequency dictated by the monitoring and analysis process. The information collected by Hydrographic
Offices about the coastal zone provides essential input to coastal zone GIS (Geographic Information
Systems) which are increasingly being used for better overall management and decision-making with
regard to conflicting uses within the coastal region. The users of hydrographic information go beyond the
traditional user group, mariners, to include government agencies, coastal managers, engineers, and
scientists.

Exploration and exploitation of marine resources

Although intended primarily to support safety of navigation, the extensive data-bases amassed over the
years by Hydrographic Offices, together with their various products and services, are of considerable
economic value in assisting the management and exploitation of natural marine resources. In recent
years, it has become more evident that inadequate hydrographic services not only restrict the growth of
maritime trade but also lead to costly delays in resource exploration.

Coastal and offshore sedimentary areas may contain mineral deposits, in particular hydrocarbons, which
require adequate surveys in order to be identified. If the existence of these hydrocarbons is confirmed,
this will lead to the coastal nation's undertaking development of hydrocarbon production which implies
interpretation of the sea floor morphology; navigation safety for the transportation of these hazardous
cargoes; safety of offshore platforms and related sea floor transmission systems and the placement of
production wells and the laying of pipelines. Bathymetric, tidal and meteorological data provided by a
Hydrographic Service is a fundamental element in the development of a hydrocarbon industry.

The fishing industry is also a source of national wealth. Fishermen need marine information not only for
the safe navigation of their vessels but also for safe deployment of their fishing gear, which will prevent
costly losses. In addition, oceanographic charts, compiled and produced by Hydrographic Offices, are
now being extensively used by the fishing industry.

Fishery activities need detailed charts in order to:

- avoid loss of fishing gear and fishing vessels on undetected or poorly charted
obstructions;
- identify fishing areas;
- locate areas where fishing is limited or prohibited.

M-13
 5

This kind of information is subject to frequent changes and therefore needs constant updating.
Hydrographic surveying is essential to obtain timely and up-to-date information and should be
periodically repeated.

The trend of modern fishery science is orientated towards habitat management; bathymetry and other
ocean data will provide important input for proper species management and development.

Environment Protection and Management

An essential factor for the protection of the environment is safe and accurate navigation. Pollution caused
by wrecks and oil spills are a major damage factor, the economic consequences of which are more
devastating than is commonly imagined, but which, in some cases, have been estimated at US $ 3 billion
for a single incident.

The value of navigation services for the protection of the marine environment has been internationally
recognized. In this respect, it should be noted that Chapter 17 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations
Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED), held in 1992, recognized that
"Hydrographic charting is vitally important to navigational safety"

Marine Science

Marine science depends largely on bathymetric information. Global tide and circulation models, local
and regional models for a wide variety of scientific studies, marine geology/geophysics, the
deployment/placement of scientific instrumentation and many other aspects of marine science depend on
bathymetry provided by Hydrographic Services.

National Spatial Data Infrastructure

In the information age it is realised by governments that good quality and well managed spatial data are
an essential ingredient to economic and commercial development, and to environmental protection. For
this reason many nations are establishing national spatial data infrastructures, bringing together the
services and data sets of major national spatial data providers, for example topography, geodesy,
geophysics, meteorology, and bathymetry. The Hydrographic Service is an important part of the national
spatial data infrastructure.

Maritime Boundary Delimitation

Good hydrographic data is essential to proper delimitation of the maritime boundaries as detailed in the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Maritime Defense

Navies are major users of nautical chart products in that they must be prepared for deployment to many
areas in the world and typically must maintain a large set of charts. The unique risks associated with the
carriage of munitions and nuclear material make it important for such vessels to have up-to-date
information. The marine data and information provided by national Hydrographic Offices support a
variety of products used in naval operations. Surface, submarine, anti-submarine, mine-hunting and air-
sea naval operations need nautical information products very different one from another. Hydrographic
and oceanographic data necessary for the preparation of such products must be available if national
investment in defence is to be optimised.

M-13
 6

Tourism

Good charts are particularly important to the development of the economically important industry of
tourism, especially involving cruise ships. The potential of the cruise ship industry is especially
important to developing nations. Yet this important source of revenue cannot be properly developed if
safe navigation to remote touristic landscapes is prevented or limited by a lack of adequate charts.
Tourism is one of the major growth industries of the 21st Century.

Recreational boating

The recreational boating community represents a large percentage of mariners. It is generally not
mandatory for leisure craft to carry charts and recreational mariners often do not update their charts;
however, the advent of digital chart information is making it possible for the recreational user to have
updated chart information readily available along with many types of value added information such as
marina locations, etc. This development is likely to result in the recreational leisure sector becoming a
significantly larger user of the hydrographic data as greater numbers of people become able to afford boat
ownership. Again income from this sector is increasingly significant to many countries.

As it can be seen, it is extremely difficult to quantify the economic and commercial benefits which flow
from a national hydrographic programme, but several studies by IHO Member States have suggested that
the cost to benefit ratio is about 1:10 for major maritime nations. It is also true that volumes of maritime
trade are growing continuously and, in the future, the exploitation and sustainable development of the
national maritime zones will become a major pre-occupation of government and industry.

It should also be noted that, in economic parlance, the national hydrographic programme is regarded as a
"Public Good". That is to say the necessary services required in the public interest will not be supplied at
optimal levels by market forces alone. In every IHO Member State the provision of hydrographic
services is a responsibility of central government, as an essential component of national economic
development. This overall and important economic dimension of the work has sometimes been obscured
by the emphasis on sector interests served by hydrographic services, and more recently by legislative or
regulatory requirements. It is clear that the economic dimension of Hydrography deserves greater
attention than it has received in the past.

__________

M-13
 7

CHAPTER 1
PRINCIPLES OF HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING

1. INTRODUCTION

Hydrographic surveying deals with the configuration of the bottom and adjacent land areas of oceans,
lakes, rivers, harbours, and other water forms on Earth. In strict sense, it is defined merely as the
surveying of a water area; however, in modern usage it may include a wide variety of other objectives
such as measurements of tides, current, gravity, earth magnetism, and determinations of the physical and
chemical properties of water. The principal objective of most hydrographic surveys, is to obtain basic
data for the compilation of nautical charts with emphasis on the features that may affect safe navigation.
Other objectives include acquiring the information necessary for related marine navigational products and
for coastal zone management, engineering, and science1.
2
The purpose of hydrographic surveying is :

• To collect, with systematic surveys at sea, along the coast and inland, georeferenced data related to:

♦ Shoreline configuration, including man made infrastructure for maritime navigation i.e. all those
features on shore that are of interest to mariners.
♦ Depths in the area of interest (including all potential hazards to navigation and other marine
activities).
♦ Sea bottom composition.
♦ Tides and Currents.
♦ Physical properties of the water column.

• To process the information collected in order to create organized databases capable of feeding the
production of thematic maps, nautical charts and other types of documentation for the following most
common uses :

♦ Maritime navigation and traffic management.

♦ Naval operations.
♦ Coastal zone management.
♦ Marine environment preservation.
♦ Exploitation of marine resources and laying of submarine cables/pipelines.
♦ Maritime boundaries definition (Law of the Sea implementation).
♦ Scientific studies.

Mariners have unquestioning faith in nautical charts and where no dangers are shown, they believe that
none exist. Nautical chart is an end product of a hydrographic survey. Its accuracy and adequacy depend
3
on the quality of the data collected during the surveys . A nautical chart is a graphic portrayal of the

1
NOAA Hydrographic Manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-1-3, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf
2
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, National Maritime Policies and Hydrographic
Services (M-2), P-13.
3
NOAA Hydrographic manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-1-3, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf

M-13
 8

marine environment; showing the nature and form of the coast, depths of the water and general character
and configuration of the sea bottom, locations of dangers to navigation, rise and fall of the tides, cautions
of manmade aids to navigation, and the characteristics of the Earth’s magnetism. The actual form of a
chart may vary from a traditional paper chart to an electronic chart.

An electronic chart is not simply a digital version of a paper chart; it introduces a new navigation
methodology with capabilities and limitations very different from paper charts. The electronic chart has
become the legal equivalent of the paper chart as approved by the International Maritime Organization.
Divergences in purpose have led to the publication of various “new-generation” charts. Bathymetric
charts developed from digital data or created from multi-beam sounding data allow the underwater relief
to be visualised by means of varying blue tints and isobaths. Similarly, side-scan sonar mosaics have
been published in the form of charts or atlases to characterise the large geomorphological structures.
Such charts no longer have, as their object, the safety of navigation, but rather, the knowledge of the
environment required for submarine navigation, oceanographic research or industrial applications, such as
cable laying, seabed mining and oil exploitation.

Hydrographic surveying is undergoing fundamental changes in measurement technology. Multibeam

acoustic and airborne laser systems now provide almost total seafloor coverage and measurement as
compared to the earlier sampling by bathymetric profiles. The capability to position the data precisely in
the horizontal plane has been increased enormously by the availability of satellite positioning systems,
particularly when augmented by differential techniques. This advance in technology has been particularly
significant since navigators are now able to position themselves with greater accuracy than that of the data
on which older charts are based4.

2. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING

2.1 Survey Specifications

Requirements for hydrographic surveys arise as the result of policy decisions, product user reports or
requests, national defence needs, and other demands. The inception of a specific hydrographic survey
project follows an evaluation of all known requirements and the establishment of priorities. Among the
many objective and subjective factors that influence the establishment of priorities are national and
agency goal, quantitative and qualitative measures of shipping and boating, the adequacy of existing
5
surveys, and the rate of change of the submarine topography in the area .

To accommodate in a systematic manner different accuracy requirements for areas to be surveyed, four
orders of survey are defined by IHO in publication S-44 edition 98. These are described in subsequent
paragraphs. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the overall, requirements and are in fact the essence of the
6
complete standard .

2.1.1 Special Order hydrographic surveys approach engineering standards and their use is intended to
be restricted to specific critical areas with minimum under keel clearance and where bottom
characteristics are potentially hazardous to vessels. These areas have to be explicitly designated by the
agency responsible for survey quality. Examples are harbours, berthing areas, and associated critical
channels. All error sources must be minimized. Special Order requires the use of closely spaced lines in

4
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, National Maritime Policies and Hydrographic
Services (M-2), P-19.
5
NOAA Hydrographic manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-2-1, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf
6
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (S-44),
P-14-8, fourth edition 1998.

M-13
 9

conjunction with side scan sonar, multi-transducer arrays or high resolution multibeam echosounders to
obtain 100% bottom search. It must be ensured that cubic features greater than 1m can be discerned by
the sounding equipment. The use of side scan sonar in conjunction with a multibeam echosounder may
be necessary in areas where thin and dangerous obstacles may be encountered.

2.1.2 Order 1 hydrographic surveys are intended for harbours, harbour approach channels,
recommended tracks, inland navigation channels, and coastal areas of high commercial traffic density
where under keel clearance is less critical and the geophysical properties of the seafloor are less
hazardous to vessels (e.g. soft silt or sandy bottom). Order 1 surveys should be limited to areas with less
than 100 m water depth. Although the requirement for seafloor search is less stringent than for Special
Order, full bottom search is required in selected areas where the bottom characteristics and the risk of
obstructions are potentially hazardous to vessels. For these areas searched, it must be ensured that cubic
features greater than 2 m up to 40 m water depth or greater than 10% of the depth in areas deeper than 40
m can be discerned by the sounding equipment.

2.1.3 Order 2 hydrographic surveys are intended for areas with depths less than 200 m not covered by
Special Order and Order 1 and where a general description of the bathymetry is sufficient to ensure there
are no obstructions on the seafloor that will endanger the type of vessel expected to transit or work the
area. It is the criteria for a variety of maritime uses for which higher order hydrographic surveys cannot
be justified. Full bottom search may be required in selected areas where the bottom characteristics and the
risk of obstructions may be potentially hazardous to vessels.

2.1.4 Order 3 hydrographic surveys are intended for all areas not covered by Special Order, and
Orders 1 and 2 in water depths in excess of 200 m.

Notes:

For Special Order and Order 1 surveys the agency responsible for the survey quality may define a depth
limit beyond which a detailed investigation of the seafloor is not required for safety of navigation
purposes.

Side scan sonar should not be used for depth determination but to define areas requiring more detailed
and accurate investigation.

TABLE 1.1
Summary of Minimum Standards for Hydrographic Surveys

ORDER Special 1 2 3
Examples of Harbours, berthing Harbours, harbour Areas not described Offshore areas not
Typical Areas areas, and approach channels, in Special Order and described in Special
associated critical recommended tracks Order 1, or areas up Order, and Orders 1
channels with and some coastal areas to 200 m water depth and 2
minimum under with depths up to 100
keel clearances m

Horizontal 2m 5 m + 5% of depth 20 m + 5% of depth 150 m + 5% of depth

Accuracy (95%
Confidence
Level)

M-13
 10

ORDER Special 1 2 3
Depth Accuracy a = 0.25 m a = 0.5 m a = 0.1.0 m Same as Order 2
for Reduced b.= 0.0075 b.= 0.013 b.= 0.023
Depths (95%
Confidence
Level) (1)
100% Bottom Compulsory (2) Required in selected May be required in Not applicable
Search areas (2) selected areas
System Cubic features > 1 Cubic features > 2 m Same as Order 1 Not applicable
Detection m in depths up to 40 m;
Capability 10% of depth beyond
40 m (3)
Maximum Line Not applicable, as 3 x average depth or 3-4 x average depth 4 x average depth
spacing (4) 100% search 25 m, whichever is or 200 m, whichever
compulsory greater is greater

(1) To calculate the error limits for depth accuracy the corresponding values of ‘a’ and ‘b’ listed
in Table 1 have to be introduced into the formula

± √ [a2 +(b*d)2]
with
a constant depth error, i.e. the sum of all constant errors
b*d depth dependent error, i.e. the sum of all depth dependent errors
b factor of depth dependent error
d depth

(2) For safety of navigation purposes, the use of an accurately specified mechanical sweep to
guarantee a minimum safe clearance depth throughout an area may be considered sufficient
for Special Order and Order 1 surveys.
(3) The value of 40 m has been chosen considering the maximum expected draught of vessels.

(4) The line spacing can be expanded if procedures for ensuring an adequate sounding density
are used

The rows of Table 1 are explained as follows:

- Row 1 "Examples of Typical Areas" gives examples of areas to which an order of

survey might typically be applied.

- Row 2 "Horizontal Accuracy" lists positioning accuracies to be achieved to meet each

order of survey.
- Row 3 "Depth Accuracy" specifies parameters to be used to calculate accuracies of
reduced depths to be achieved to meet each order of survey.

- Row 4 "100% Bottom Search" specifies occasions when full bottom search should be
conducted.

- Row 5 "System Detection Capability" specifies the detection capabilities of systems

used for bottom search.

M-13
 11

- Row 6 "Maximum Line Spacing" is to be interpreted as

- spacing of sounding lines for single beam sounders, and
- distance between the outer limits of swaths for swath sounding systems.

2.2 Survey Planning

Survey planning covers a wide range of activities from the development of an idea for a survey within the
Hydrographic Office and its subsequent issue as Project Instructions / Hydrographic Instructions (HIs), to
the detailed planning and organisation of a surveying ship to fulfil a practical task. It covers inter
departmental liaison at Government level, diplomatic cooperation and the allocation of numerous
expensive resources. It also covers prioritization of resources and day to day running of a survey ship
employed on surveying task. Survey planning involves blending of these activities into a coherent pattern
aimed at the achievement of a specific task.
7
A survey begins long before actual data collection starts. Some elements, which must be decided, are :

• Exact area of the survey.

• Type of survey (reconnaissance or standard) and scale to meet standards of chart to be produced.
• Scope of the survey (short or long term).
• Platforms available (ships, launches, aircraft, leased vessels, cooperative agreements).
• Support work required (aerial or satellite photography, geodetics, tides).
• Limiting factors (budget, political or operational constraints, positioning systems limitations,
logistics).

Once these issues are decided, all information available in the survey area is reviewed. This includes
aerial photography, satellite data, topographic maps, existing nautical charts, geodetic information, tidal
information, and anything else affecting the survey. HO will normally undertake this strategic planning of
surveys in cooperation with other organisations and, from this, Projects Instructions / Hydrographic
Instructions (HIs) will be compiled by the Hydrographer and issued for compliance. Details provided in
Project Instructions / HIs will include some or all of the following, depending on the type of survey
8
required :

• Survey limits.
• Data requirement and resolution.
• Method of positional control, together with the accuracy expected.
• Use to be made of sonar.
• How the survey report is to be rendered and target date if appropriate.
• A general, and at times detailed, description of the reason for the survey priorities, methods to be
employed, particular observations to be made and other relevant guidance or instruction.

In addition, appendices to HIs will give instruction or guidance on the following:

• Horizontal datum, projection and grid to be used.

• Wrecks in the area.
• Tidal datum and observations required.

7
Bowditch -The American Practical Navigator, P-411, http://www.irbs.com/bowditch/
8
Admiralty, General Instructions for Hydrographic Surveys (GIHS), Sixth Edition, 1992, P- 5-3.

M-13
 12

• Particular instructions regarding the collection of data in respect of oceanography, geophysics,

sailing directions, air photography etc.

On receipt of Project Instructions/HIs, the survey planners then compile sound velocity information,
climatology, water clarity data, any past survey data, and information from lights lists, sailing directions,
and notices to mariners. Tidal information is thoroughly reviewed and tide gauge locations chosen. Local
vertical control data is reviewed to see if it meets the expected accuracy standards, so the tide gauges can
be linked to the vertical datum used for the survey. Horizontal control is reviewed to check for accuracy
and discrepancies and to determine sites for local positioning systems to be used in the survey.

Development of a general survey plan and subsequent site specific survey plans will create a more
efficient survey. The general survey plan addresses the way that surveys are planned, performed, and
processed. This plan must be well thought out and robust to account for as many contingencies as
possible. This plan includes training, software, equipment maintenance and upgrades, logistics, all data
requirements, schedule, safety, and weather. The site specific survey plan will address local notifications,
survey lines, datum, data density, and specific equipment and personnel that will meet the general survey
plan requirements. Few are described below:

• Training of surveyors should be catered during a survey operation in order to ensure appropriate
competencies are maintained.

• Data logging and processing software are critical in a survey operation. These should be user friendly
and personnel employed on these need to be well conversant with its all functions.

• Suitable survey platform and equipment should be selected. Some equipment will lend itself to
particular types of surveys and others will be more general in use. It is paramount that a proper
selection is made.

• The purpose for the survey will usually dictate the data requirement (density, coverage, and
precision). However, if there are no impact to cost and schedule, then as many requirements should be
addressed as possible.

• Schedule is often a critical element in a hydrographic survey. The data requirement usually has as a
specific deliverable date assigned, such that the survey data collection and processing occur within a
very specific time frame. This requires that the personnel and equipment resources be adequate to
meet this need. In some cases, if the schedule cannot be met, then the survey simply will not be
requested and other sources will be used. Considering this, it is important to plan and analyze all
aspects of a general survey plan with the ability to meet schedule as a prime element.

• Safety is the primary consideration. It is incumbent on the person in charge in the field to evaluate
every situation for possible hazards. If there is an identified hazard, then it needs to be addressed
before continuing with the activity.

• Notifications to the local authorities / harbourmaster office should be made with enough time to allow
them to notify the local mariners.

• Survey lines for multibeam surveys should follow the contours of the harbour bottom. This will
reduce the changes in bottom coverage created by different water depths. However, when using a
single beam survey system, the lines should run perpendicular to contours. This will help in

M-13
 13

determining changes in the bottom relief. Multibeam survey lines also need to be spaced so as to
achieve the proper amount of overlap or data density to meet the survey standard.

• An integral part of the data of a survey is the reference datum. It is required, by good survey practice,
to clearly indicate by note on the published survey the actual vertical and horizontal reference used,
and the procedures used to establish the datum for the survey. WGS-84 is being used worldwide.
• Data density will vary based on method of survey, water depth, and need. The method of survey will
be determined by equipment available for the survey, the personnel, and survey site conditions. If
only a single beam survey system is available, then data density will be less. With a multibeam
system, the greater the water depth the less dense the data will be, unless multiple passes are made.
The type of survey will dictate the data redundancy or data overlap requirements.

• It is important to standardize the equipment as much as possible to limit training, maintenance and
overheads.

2.3 Data Gathering

Data gathering is dependent upon various factors. The survey requirements, the platform and equipment
available and the time specified for a particular task will determine the amount of data to be collected. A
large amount of data can be collected using latest hydrographic software’s and tools like multibeam echo
sounders. In particular, the purpose of the survey will usually dictate the data requirement (data density,
data coverage, and data precision). However, if there is no impact to cost and schedule, then as many data
may be collected as possible during field survey. The data collection be made in methodical manner
starting from one side of the area ending on other.

It should be noted that data redundancy and data density are not the same thing. Data density is the
number of soundings per unit of area, while data redundancy refers to data overlap or data collected at a
different time at the same location. The type of survey defines data redundancy or data overlap
requirements. Full coverage surveys deal more with data density insuring that all bottom
features/obstructions have been located. These need to be clearly understood by those requesting the
survey and those doing the survey to insure compliance with the standards specified by IHO.

2.4 Data Processing

Data processing must be done under strict quality control criteria. Hydrographic data is either collected by
automated systems or converted into an automated format. Final data processing and plotting are
accomplished using onboard or office-based computer systems. A standard approach for a hydrographic
9
survey is the collect-process-collect methodology . The data collected is processed and subsequently gaps
and areas with questionable data re-surveyed. Most of the hydrographic systems are capable of
performing “field-finish” operations, wherein survey data is collected, processed, plotted and analyzed in
the field. Comprehensive survey planning is required for an integrated approach that generates the base
line for all real-time and post processing operation with the system. An example of such a model is given
10
below :

9
B. Bourgeois, F. Petry, M. Harris & P. Alleman, “A GIS Integration Approach for Dynamically Reconfigurable Surveys”,
The Hydrographic Journal, January 1999, P 3-10.
10
Pentti Junni & Ralf Lindgren, “The Hydrophic Information System – Co-operation, Concept and Future”, Finish Maritime
Administration, http://www.esri.com/library/userconf/proc97/proc97/pap619/p619.html

M-13
 14

Data + Process = Job

Job Progress Log

b

Source Document
Process

Process steps
Features/Raw Data

Fig. 1.1 "Data Processing model"

This model describes the different processes that can ideally handle the hydrographic information. The
process contains several steps. The comments of each process step along with results, statistics should be
recorded in a progress log. Further, the source and general quality information of any new data be
described in source document which is stored in the database.
The core requirement of data processing is the generation of valid data; which has been sufficiently
processed i.e. undergone through various procedures at various stages or represented so that evaluation
can be made. These procedures/processing steps could be applied in real-time or during post processing
but have to ensure that the final product meets the standards and specifications defined by IHO.
Care is to be exercised in processing the raw data. It is to be ensured that all errors have been eliminated
and necessary corrections e.g. system calibration factors and sensor offsets, or variable values such as
sound velocity profiles and tide values for the reduction of soundings, have been applied. The processing
should strive to use all available sources of information to confirm the presence of navigationally
significant soundings and quality data. Few processing steps outlined below are only to be interpreted as
11
an indication, also with regard to their sequence, and are not necessarily exhaustive :

• Position: Merging of positioning data from different sensors (if necessary), qualifying
positioning data, and eliminating position jumps.

• Depth corrections: Corrections should be applied for water level changes, measurements of
attitude sensors, and changes of the draught of the survey vessel (e. g. squat changing with speed;
change over time caused by fuel consumption). It should be possible to re-process data for which
corrections were applied in real-time.

• Attitude corrections: Attitude data (heading, pitch, roll) should be qualified and data jumps be
eliminated.

11
IHO, Monaco, Circular Letter 45/2001, “Guidelines for the Processing of High Volume Bathymetric Data”, Para-3.2, dated
5 Oct 01.

M-13
 15

• Sound velocity: Corrections due to refraction be calculated and applied; If these corrections
have already been applied in real-time during the survey, it should be possible to override them
by using another sound velocity profile with the advent of MBES, the application of S V has
become critical.

• Merging positions and depths: The time offset (latency) and the geometric offset between
sensors have to be taken into consideration.
2.5 Data Analysis
The accuracy of the results of survey measurement should always be quoted to show how good or
reliable they are. Since no equipment is entirely free of errors, therefore, errors are introduced in all
observations. In addition, errors are introduced in computations by approximations in formulae or by
rounding. Observational techniques are designed to eliminate all but small random errors, which can then
be analyzed by rigorous techniques to quantify the accuracy of the observations. Various errors, their
sizes and procedures to eliminate are as under:

ERROR SIZE ELIMINATION

Blunder Large Training, care procedures.
Constant Usually small, but fixed Calibration or procedures
Periodic Usually small, but variable Procedure (repetition), even for
large errors
Random Usually small Only reduced, by repetition

Constant, Systematic and Periodic errors are frequently considered together as ‘Systematic Errors’.
Constant and Systematic errors are accumulative, and thus cannot be reduced by repetition. Random
errors are present in all observations; the result can never be ‘exact’. These errors are as likely to be
positive as negative and more likely to be of small size.

It is important that no method of adjustment can obtain an accurate solution from inaccurate observations.
All errors other than small random ones must be eliminated prior to the adjustment. However, it may be
possible to isolate a ‘systematic’ error by analysis, provided that sufficient data is available. It is clearly
desirable to know when Constant and / or Systematic Errors are present in observations. Constant Errors
are often difficult to detect, and may only become apparent during computation or in special checks, e.g.,
an incorrectly calibrated crystal of a Tellurometer can be detected if that Tellurometer is compared with
another. Periodic and Random Errors however can often be detected by analyzing a series of
observations. The algebraic difference between each observation and the mean of all the observations is
called the Residual of that observation. If only random errors are present, then the Residuals will vary
randomly in magnitude and sign. If systematic errors are present then the magnitudes and / or the signs of
the Residuals will show systematic trends. To assist in data analysis, raw data attributes and metadata
should be mentioned for subsequent evaluation.

2.6 Data Quality

Quality is about “fitness for the use”. It has to do with the extent to which a data set, or map output
satisfied the needs of the person judging it. Error is the difference between actual and true data. Error is a
major issue in quality. It is often used as an umbrella term to describe all the types of the effects that

M-13
 16

12
cause data to depart from what they should be . To allow a comprehensive assessment of the quality of
survey data, it is necessary to record or document certain information together with the survey data. Such
information is important to allow exploitation of survey data by a variety of users with different
requirements, especially as requirements may not be known when survey data is collected. The process of
documenting the data quality is called data attribution; the information on the data quality is called
13
metadata. Metadata should comprise at least information on :

• The survey in general as e.g. date, area, equipment used, name of survey platform.
• The geodetic reference system used, i.e. horizontal and vertical datum; including ties to WGS 84
if a local datum is used.
• Calibration procedures and results.
• Sound velocity.
• Tidal datum and reduction.
• Accuracies achieved and the respective confidence levels.

Metadata should preferably be in digital form and an integral part of the survey record. If this is not
feasible similar information should be included in the documentation of a survey. Data quality can be
14
achieved by effective quality control either by automatic or manual means .

• Automatic (Non-interactive) Quality Control: In this, the coordinates (i.e. positions and
depths) obtained should be controlled automatically by a programme using suitable statistical
algorithms which have been documented, tested and demonstrated to produce repeatable and
accurate results.

• Manual (Interactive) Quality Control: In this, the use of 3-D visualisation tools is strongly
recommended. These tools should allow viewing the data using a zoom facility. The interactive
processing system should also offer different display modes for visualisation, e.g. depth plot,
error plot, single profile, single beam, backscatter imagery etc. and should allow for the
visualisation of the survey data in conjunction with other useful information as e.g. shoreline,
wrecks, aids to navigation etc; editing of data should be possible in all modes and include an audit
trail. If feasible, data displays should be geo-referenced. The flags set during the automatic stage,
which correspond to depths shallower than the surrounding area, should require explicit operator
action, at least, for Special Order and Order 1 surveys. If the operator overrules flags set during
the automatic stage, this should be documented. If a flag is set by the operator, the type of flag
used should indicate this.

2.7 Data Quality - Presentation

2.7.1 Chart Reliability Diagrams

Traditionally, the quality of bathymetric data has been a subjective procedure. For a user, the quality of
the data which is presented is assessed through the chart reliability diagram. This diagram is displayed as
an inset on a chart and indicates the areas surveyed together with some detail, e.g. scale, line spacing, year

12
Patrick McGlamery, “Issues of Authenticity of Spatial data”, University of Connecticut USA, 66th IFLA Council and
General Conference, http://magic.lib.uconn.edu.
13
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (S-44), P-12, fourth edition
1998.
14
IHO, Monaco, Circular Letter 45/200, “Guidelines for the Procesing of High Volume Bathymetric Data”, Para-3.3, dated 5
Oct 01.

M-13
 17

of survey. Unfortunately, the very nature of the information displayed on a reliability diagram, the ability
to qualify data quality is severely limited. For instance, if the chart user is unaware what a pre 1970 sonar
swept area means or what might be inferred from a line spacing of “n” metres, then the reliability diagram
is of little real use in determining the quality of the depth data shown.

The original concept of the reliability diagram was to classify the quality of survey data and depict the
different classifications on a diagram in terms of good, fair or poor quality. The diagram was intended to
provide the mariner with the capacity to assess the danger of deviating from the recommended track.
However, there has been growing concern over the complexity of the reliability diagram and the
increasing difficulty of maintaining it in a form which is simple for the chart user. If they are too
complicated; reliability diagrams become difficult to construct as a cartographic activity, prone to error in
construction, and its use would be ignored by the mariners.

Reliability diagrams fall well short of achieving the fundamental aim of providing an indication of data
quality to the mariner and in a very simple form. Furthermore, given the precise navigation capability
which ENC and the ECDIS can facilitate, users require a far more definitive assessment of data quality to
be available so that they can use the available information prudently. Thus, an alternative to the existing
reliability diagram is required as the final quality indicator.

Source diagrams and similar variants shown on charts are all considered to present similar shortcomings.

2.7.2 Zones of Confidence (ZOC)

The ZOC concept was developed by the IHO to provide a mean of classifying bathymetric data. ZOC
provide a simple and logical mean of displaying to the mariner the confidence that the national charting
authority places on any particular selection of bathymetric data. It seeks to classify areas for navigation
by identifying the various levels of confidence that can be placed in the underlying data using a
combination of the following criteria:

* Depth and position accuracy,

* Thoroughness of seafloor search, and
* Conformance to an approved quality plan.

Under this concept six ZOCs were developed and subsequently approved for inclusion as a part of IHO S-
57. ZOCs A1, A2, and B are generated from modern and future surveys with, critically, ZOCs A1 and A2
requiring a full area search. ZOCs C and D reflect low accuracy and poor quality data whilst ZOC U
represents data which is un-assessed at the time of publication. ZOCs are designed to be depicted on
paper charts, as an insert diagram in place of the current reliability diagram, and on electronic displays.

It must be emphasized that ZOCs are a charting standard and are not intended to be used for specifying
standards for hydrographic surveys or for the management of data quality. The depth and position
accuracy specified for each ZOC refer to the errors of the final depicted soundings and include not only
survey errors but also any other errors introduced in the chart production process. The following
paragraphs summaries individual ZOC specifications:

2.7.2.1 ZOC A1 – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. Surveys conducted using recognized technology with a full area search undertaken with the
aim of ensuring that all significant features are detected and depths measured. Typically, the survey
would have been undertaken on WGS 84, using DGPS or a minimum three lines of position with
multibeam, channel or mechanical sweep system. Due to the intensity of data gathering and the
considerable time required to achieve this standard it can be expected that data with a ZOC A1 rating will

M-13
 18

most likely indicate critical channels, berthing areas, areas with minimum under keel clearances,
navigation channels, recommended tracks, harbours and harbour approaches.

2.7.2.2 ZOC A2 – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. Survey conducted using recognized technology with a full area search undertaken with the aim
of ensuring that all significant features are detected and depths measured. Typically, the survey would
have been conducted using a modern survey echosounder with sonar or mechanical sweep. Although
position and depth accuracies not as high as ZOC A1, seafloor coverage is such that the mariner should
have a high level of confidence in the quality of data.

2.7.2.3 ZOC B – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. However, a full area search has not been achieved and uncharted features, hazardous to surface
navigation, although not expected, may exist. This ZOC indicates to the mariner a reasonable level of
confidence in the quality of data. ZOC B has the same position and depth accuracies as those required for
ZOC A2 and would apply to (e.g.) modern surveys which have not achieved a full seafloor search and
feature detection. The prudent mariner would require more under keel clearance in this ZOC than in ZOC
A1 or A2.

2.7.2.4 ZOC C – Position and depth accuracy less than that achieved for ZOC B as described. Depth
data may originate from sources other than a controlled, systematic hydrographic survey (e.g. passage
sounding). A full area search has not been achieved and depth anomalies may be expected. ZOC C
indicates that the mariner should navigate with special care and allow, with due regard to the depth of
water in which they are navigating, greater safety margins to the charted information.

2.7.2.5 ZOC D – Position and depth data is of a very low quality or cannot be assessed due to a lack of
supporting information. A full area search has not been achieved and large depth anomalies may be
expected.

M-13
 19

2.7.2.6 ZOC U – The quality of bathymetric data has yet to be assessed.

TABLE 1.2

Category of Zones of Confidence in Data – ZOC Table

1 2 3 4 5
ZOC1 Position2 Depth Accuracy3 Seafloor4 Typical Survey5
Accuracy Coverage Characteristics
A1 ± 5m = 0.50 + 1%d Full area search Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy undertaken. All survey6 high position and
(m) significant seafloor depth accuracy, achieved
10 ± 0.6 features4 detected using DGPS or a minimum
30 ± 0.8 have had depths of three high quality lines
100 ± 1.5 measured. of position (LOP) and a
1000 ± 10.5 multibeam, channel or
mechanical sweep system.
ZOC1 Position2 Depth Accuracy3 Seafloor4 Typical Survey5
Accuracy Coverage Characteristics
A2 ± 20m = 1.00 + 2%d Full area search Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy undertaken. All survey6 high position and
(m) significant seafloor depth accuracy less than
10 ± 1.2 features4 detected ZOC A1, and using a
30 ± 1.6 have had depths modern survey
100 ± 3.0 measured. eachosounder7 and a sonar
1000 ± 21.0 or mechanical sweep
system.
B ± 50m = 1.00 + 2%d Full area search not Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy achieved; survey6 achieving similar
(m) uncharted features, depth but lesser position
10 ± 1.2 hazardous to accuracies than ZOC A2,
30 ± 1.6 surface navigation, using a modern survey
100 ± 3.0 are not expected, eachosounder7 but no
1000 ± 21.0 but may exist. sonar or mechanical sweep
system.
C ± 500m = 2.00 + 5%d Full AREA Low accuracy survey or
Depth(m) Accuracy SEARCH NOT data collected on an
(m) ACHIEVED; depth opportunity basis such as
10 ± 2.5 anomalies may be soundings on passage.
30 ± 3.5 expected.
100 ± 7.0
1000 ± 52.0

D Worse than Worse Poor quality or data that

ZOC C Than cannot be assessed due to
ZOC C lack of information.
U Un-assessed

M-13
 20

Notes:

To decide on a ZOC category, all conditions outlined in Columns 2 to 4 of the Table must be met,
Explanatory note numbers quoted in the table have the following meanings:

1. The allocation of a ZOC indicates that particular data meets minimum criteria for position
and depth accuracy and seafloor coverage defined in the Table. ZOC categories reflect a
charting standard and not just a hydrographic survey standard. Depth and position
accuracies specified for each ZOC category refer to the errors of the final depicted soundings
and include not only hydrographic survey errors but also other errors introduced in the chart
production process. Data may be further qualified by Object Class “Quality of Data”
(M_QUAL) sub-attributes as follows:

* Positional Accuracy (POSACC) and Sounding Accuracy (SOUACC) may be used to

indicate that a higher position or depth accuracy has been achieved than defined in this
Table (e.g. a survey where full seafloor coverage was not achieved could not be classified
higher that ZOC B; however, if the position accuracy was, for instance ± 15 metres, the
sub-attribute POSACC could be used to indicate this).

* Swept areas where the clearance depth is accurately known but the actual seabed depth
is not accurately known may be accorded a “higher” ZOC (i.e. A1 or A2) providing
position and depth accuracies of the swept depth meets the criteria in this Table. In this
instance, Depth Range Value 1 (DRVAL1) may be used to specify the swept depth. The
position accuracy criteria apply to the boundaries of swept areas.

* SURSTA, SUREND and TECSOU may be used to indicate the start and end dates of the
survey and the technique of sounding measurement.

2. Position accuracy criteria at 95% CI (2.45 sigma) with respect to the given datum. It is the
cumulative error and includes survey, transformation and digitizing errors etc. Position
accuracy need not be rigorously computed for ZOCs B, C and D but may be estimated based
on type of equipment, calibration regime, historical accuracy etc.

3. Depth accuracy of depicted soundings for (e.g.) ZOC A1 = 0.50 metres + 1% d at 95% CI
(2.00 sigma) where d = depth in metres at the critical depth. Depth accuracy need not be
rigorously computed for ZOCs B, C and D but may be estimated based on type of equipment,
calibration regime, historical accuracy etc.

4. Significant seafloor features are defined as those rising above depicted depths by more than:

Note: Mariners should have due regard to limitations of sounding equipment when assessing
margins of safety to be applied.

Depth Significant Feature

< 10 metres > 0.1 x depth
10 to 30 metres > 1.0 metre
> 30 metres > (0.1 x depth minus 2.0 metres

5. Typical Survey Characteristics – These descriptions should be seen as indicative examples

only.

M-13
 21

6. Controlled, systematic surveys (ZOCs A1, A2 and B) – surveys comprising planned survey
lines, on a geodetic datum that can be transformed to WGS 84.

7. Modern survey echosounder – a high precision single beam depth measuring equipment,
generally including all survey echosounders designed post 1970.

2.8 Data Production

The final data production can both be in digital and analog form. Schematic diagram is given below.

Data Production

Paper Digital

Smooth Sheet Field Records Spatial Data& Meta Data

Attributes

Data Format

Fig. 1.2 "Digital Production schematic diagram"

Digital data should be in defined format to be directly imported into main database. As each survey
typically includes numerous supporting documents and digital data files, deliverables must clearly be
labelled in a manner that is both descriptive and intuitive to hydrographic office personnel. Ideally,
standard operating procedures agreed by IHO and field units which covers such documents and digital
data files, are enforced. Manual data should be clear, concise and in legible form which is properly
labelled and marked15.

After the data is collected, processed and plotted in the form of smooth sheets (manuscript in digital
form), the inventory of the final deliverables is forwarded to Hydrographic office, the inventory of which
16
should generally include :

15
http://www.hydro.navy.gov.au/news/htf/htf.pdf.
16
Lieutenant Eric J. Sipos and Physical Scientist Castle Parker, “NOAA AHB Quality Assurance Inspections for Contract
Hydrographic Surveys”, NOAA Hydrographic Survey Division, USA

M-13
 22

• Smooth Sheets.
• Digital files of smooth sheet with attributes.
• Raw and processed bathymetric data.
• Tide, sound velocity and vessel configuration files.
• Side scan data files.
• Descriptive report and supplemental reports.
• Field logs and documentation of processing.
• Calibration documentation.

2.9 Nautical Information System (NIS)

Nautical Information system is the combination of skilled persons, spatial and descriptive data, analytic
methods and computer software and hardware - all organized to automate, manage and deliver
information through presentation i.e. paper and digital charts. Previously, the main use of nautical chart
databases was in the production of paper charts. Advances in navigation technology have set new
demands on accuracy, reliability and the format of nautical charts. The positional accuracy of the chart
should meet the increased accuracy of the positioning systems. To fully benefit from the dynamics of the
modern positioning methods, the need of digital chart has arisen in parallel to the traditional printed
charts. An international standard for digital hydrographic data has been developed by the International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO). The valid version of the standard, S-57 edition 3.1 was adopted as the
official IHO standard in November 2000 and is also specified in the International Maritime Organization
(IMO) Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). S-57
describes the standard to be used for the exchange of digital hydrographic data between national
Hydrographic Offices and for the distribution of digital data and products to manufacturers, mariners, and
other data users. The most significant digital product being delivered in the S-57 format is the electronic
navigational chart (ENC). The rapidly increased need for electronic navigational charts (ENC) has led to a
situation for many hydrographic offices where there are two separate production lines for the two
products, ENC cells and paper charts. It is essential for the safety of navigation that the products are not
in conflict with one another. A typical NIS has four main functional subsystems17 (Fig 1.3).

• Data Input. The data input subsystem allows the user to capture, collect, and transform
spatial and thematic data into digital form. The data inputs are usually derived from a
combination of hard copy maps, aerial photographs, remotely sensed images, reports, survey
documents, etc.

• Data Base - Storage and Retrieval. Data storage and retrieval subsystem organizes the
data, spatial and attribute, in a form which permits it to be quickly retrieved by the user for
analysis, and permits rapid and accurate updates to be made to the database.

• Data Base - Manipulation and Analysis. The data manipulation and analysis subsystem
allows the user to define and execute spatial and attribute procedures to generate derived
information. This subsystem is commonly thought of as the heart of a GIS, and usually
distinguishes it from other database information systems and computer-aided drafting (CAD)
systems.

• Data Output. The data output subsystem allows the user to generate graphic displays,
normally maps, and tabular reports representing derived information products.

17
Dan Sherrill and Asa Carlsson, “The JANUS Solution for Hydrographic Information”, T-Kartor AB Sweden- Box 5097 - S-
291 05 Kristianstad – Sweden, ds@t-kartor.se & ac@t-kartor.se

M-13
 23

INPUT
Maps
Processing Quality
Conversion
Images & Editing Control
Module
Module
Digital Data

DATABASE
Management

Analysis

OUTPUT
ENC files Paper charts NTMs Queries
in S-57 at various & Other &
format scales publications reports

Fig. 1.3 "NIS Functional Subsystems"

There are four components of NIS; data, hardware, software, and users18. As shown in the Fig 1.4, the
components must be integrated; they must be linked together and work in concert to support the
management and analysis of spatial or mapped data.

Hardware Software

Data Base

Data Users

Fig. 1.4 "NIS Components"

18
Lloyd P. Queen and Charles R. Blinn, “The Basics of geographic Information Systems”,
lqueen@mercurry.forestry.umn.edu and cblinnlqueen@mercurry.forestry.umn.edu

M-13
 24

• Data. All data in a database are either spatial data or attribute data. Spatial data tells us where
something occurs. Attribute data tells what occurs; it tells us the nature or characteristics of the
spatial data.

• Hardware. Computer hardware must be able to support data input, output, storage, retrieval,
display, and analysis.

• Software. Software used should be dynamic and have wide variety of functional capabilities.

• Users. The term "user" may refer to any individual who will use NIS to support project or
program goals, or to an entire organization that will employ.

2.9.1 Compilation Process

Data compilation involves assembling all of the spatial and attribute data in NIS. Map data with common
projections, scales, and coordinate systems must be pooled together in order to establish the centralized
NIS database. Data must also be examined for compatibility in terms of content and time of data
collection. Ultimately, the data will be stored in NIS according to the specific format requirements set by
both the user and the chosen NIS software/hardware environment.

When all of the common data requirements are set by the user, a "base map" has been established. A base
map is a set of standard requirements for data. It provides accurate standards for geographic control, and
also defines a model or template that is used to shape all data into a compatible form. A base map is not
necessarily a map rather, it is a comprehensive set of standards established and enacted to ensure quality
control for the spatial and attribute data contained in the NIS.

Once the data are assembled and base map parameters are set the user must translate manuscript data into
computer-compatible form. This process referred to as "conversion" or "digitizing," converts paper maps
into numerical digits that can be stored in the computer. Digitizing can be performed using various
techniques. Scanning is one technique. Another technique is line digitizing which uses a tablet and a
tracing stylus. Digitizing simplifies map data into sets of points, lines, or cells that can be stored in the
NIS computer. Each NIS software package will impose a specific form and design on the way that these
sets of points, lines, and cells are stored as digital map files.

Following figure shows the various types of compilation processes.

Chart Compilation

Manual Quasi- Computer Assisted

Fig. 1.5 "Chart Compilation Processes"

M-13
 25

2.9.1.1 Manual: Traditional cartographic work, is based on colour separation and manual processes. The
fair drawing is a manual method of preparing linework, symbols and topology (names) in accordance with
the chart specifications. High quality linework is achieved by a process called “scribing” where the image
is engraved on a coated film ensuring that cartographic specifications are carefully adhered to. Each
colour used on a map is scribed on a separate film colour plate and symbols and names are combined
photo-mechanically to produce colour separates for printing. Traditional cartography, defined as the
manual techniques used for the production of a paper chart (before the advent of the computer), can be
split in six components19:

• Compilation Work. The selection of the information collected for the production of the new
edition of the paper chart.

• Image generation. The process of assigning symbol type, shape and structure to features on a
map.

• Image registration. The technique to ensure that individual colour components fit each other in
the map.

• Contact copying at scale. The operation used to produce same-size line, half-tone and
continuous-tone positives and negatives by a direct contact process.

• Image separation/combination. The techniques used to produce multicolour maps by the

sequential overprinting of a number of separate colour components.

• Printing. The charts are printed using offset lithographic process.

Quasi – automatic: Quasi-automatic cartography is the combination of manual and computer assisted
techniques used for the production of a paper chart. Although, it contains the steps involved in manual but
some of them are done by automatic means e.g. contouring is done by drafting machines instead of hands.

2.9.1.2 Computer Assisted Cartography: To improve services and to meet the growing demands for
chart, computer assisted mapping systems are also used. The introduction of computer assisted mapping
and geographic information systems have added new dimensions to cartographic techniques and usage of
spatial data. The computer assisted cartographic steps are generally divided into the following six steps20:

• Acquisition and Input. Digital data is usually obtained from various sources e.g. digital files or
scanning of old charts.

• Verification. All incoming data is verified for various and checked for formats, scale and feature
coding etc.

• Editing and attributing. Main tasks involve ensuring features are topologically correct,
attributed and symbolized according to Cartographic Digital Standards (CDS). Original
manuscripts that were scanned require geo-referencing, and interactive editing and feature
coding. All text or annotation on the map is added interactively.

19
Lt Cdr Luis Pais, “Production and Distribution of ENC – The Portuguese Experience”, Potugal (IHPT),
hidrografia@hidrografico.pt, www.thsoa.org/pdf/h01/7_3.pdf.
20
Vic Dohar and Dave Everett, “Geological Map Production for Dummies”, Natural Resources Ottawa, Canada,
vdohar@nrcan.gc.ca,http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of00-325/dohar.html.

M-13
 26

• Quality Control. A filtering process is used to create a report document that checks the project
for completeness and correct feature attribution. Quality control officers ensure that the chart
meets design specifications and that the digital data conforms to CDS. All maps are reviewed by
the cartographers prior to publication.
• Printing. A final file is created for printing. Modern offset printing process may be single colour
machines or may print multi colours in sequence.

2.9.2 Presentation

The real world is far too complex for a complete description to be practical, therefore a simplified, highly-
specific, view of real world must be used. This is achieved by modelling the reality. The presentation of
hydrographic information may vary to suit a particular use (e.g. it may be presented either graphically,
using symbols or in a textual form). Therefore, the presentation of information should be independent of
its storage. The concept of keeping information storage independent of presentation provides greater
versatility and flexibility. It allows the same data to be used for many purposes without requiring any
change to its structure or content. If the presentation style or medium changes, only the presentation
model has to be changed. Therefore, the model described can be linked to many different presentation
models. For example, ENC and paper charts present the same basic data in different ways via different
presentation models21.

2.9.2.1 Paper Charts. A Nautical Chart is a graphic portrayal that shows the nature and form of the
coast, the depths of the water and general character and configuration of the sea bottom, locations of
dangers to navigation, the rise and fall of the tides, locations of man-made aids to navigation, and the
characteristics of the Earth's magnetism22. In addition to its basic elements, a chart is a working document
used by the mariner both as a "road map" and worksheet and is essential for safe navigation. In
conjunction with supplemental navigational aids, it is used to lay out courses and navigate ships by the
shortest and most economical safe route.

Printed charts present all important information such as chart features with appropriate symbology and
descriptive cartographic information texts and symbols. The volume of information is limited due to the
size of the chart as well as the readability aspects of it. One of the most important aspects of the
preparation work of the data to be published on the printed chart is cartographic generalization and
cartographic editing of the data. These include e.g. displacement, aggregation, selection, rotation and text
width, font and placement.

2.9.2.2 Digital Charts. Digital charts means a standardized database, as to content, structure and format,
as shown in Fig 1.6.

21
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, Specifications for Chart Content and Display Aspects of ECDIS (S-52).
22
http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov/ncd/whatis.html.

M-13
 27

Digital Chart

Vector Chart Raster Chart Hybrid Chart

ENC DNC HCRF BSB

Fig. 1.6 "Digital Chart Types and Formats"

23
Digital charts are a new navigation aid that can provide significant benefits to maritime navigation,
safety, and commerce. More than simply a computer graphics display, digital chart systems combine both
geographic and textual data into a readily useful operational tool. As an automated decision aid capable of
continuously determining a vessel's position in relation to land, charted objects, aids to navigation, and
unseen hazards, ENC are a real-time navigation system that integrates a variety of information that is
displayed and interpreted by the Mariner. The most advanced form of digital chart systems represents an
entirely new approach to maritime navigation.

2.9.2.3 Vector Charts

ENC: An Electronic Navigational Chart (ENC) is vector data conforming to IHO S-57 ENC product
specification in terms of contents, structure and format. Issued for use with ECDIS on the authority of
government authorized hydrographic offices, an ENC contains all the chart information necessary for safe
navigation and may contain supplementary information in addition to that contained in the paper chart
(e.g., sailing directions). In general, an S-57 ENC is an object-oriented, structurally layered data set
designed for a range of hydrographic applications. As defined in IHO S-57 Edition 3, the data is
comprised of a series of points, lines, features, and objects. The minimum size of a data is a “cell” which
is a spherical rectangle (i.e. bordered by meridians and latitude circles). Adjacent cells do not overlap.
The scale of the data contained in the cell is dependent upon the navigational purpose (e.g. general,
coastal, approach, harbour). Other than a 5 Mb size limit to the amount of digital data contained in an
ENC cell, there are no specifications regarding the dimensions of a cell as the smallest packaging.

DNC: The Digital Nautical Chart (DNCTM) is a vector database of selected maritime features that can be
used with shipboard integrated navigation systems (e.g. electronic chart systems), or other types of
geographic information systems (GIS). Similar to IHO S-57 ENCs, the DNC database consists of points,
lines and polygons that contain information regarding hydrography, aid-to-navigation, cultural land
marks, land features, depths, obstructions, etc. Each theme (e.g. hydrography) is stored as thematic layer
with geo-referenced properties. The DNC product is encapsulated using the Digest Annex C Vector
Relational Form (VRF) of encoding which consists of a set of relational database tables. Further the data

23
Lee Alexander, Ph.D., “What is an ENC? It depends who you ask”, Offshore Systems Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada,
http://www.osl.com/Support/what_is_enc.htm.

M-13
 28

is organised into series of “libraries” which are groupings of chart coverage which are commensurate with
NIMA’s groupings of paper nautical charts scales (e.g. General, Coastal, Approach, and Harbour). In the
ECDIS concept a DNC is a “system” electronic navigational chart (SENC) that contains specified data
and display characteristics.

2.9.2.4 Raster Charts

Raster data formats are bitmaps with a geo-reference applied to them. A bitmap is a generic term for a
computer image made up of a rectangular grid of very small (254 per inch is one standard) coloured
squares or pixels. These bitmaps are usually generated by taking the original chart and scanning them to
create a digital picture of the chart. Once this image has been acquired, a geo-reference is applied. This is
the process of relating the grid positions of the bitmap pixels to their corresponding latitude and
longitudes. In this way, a computer can relate pixel position to latitude and longitude. However, the
system has no knowledge of the details of the features and details (such as the coast line) in the raster
images it displays. Raster charts are produced by scanning at high resolution the original colour separates,
which are used to print the paper charts. The digital files are carefully georeferenced to enable navigation
software to map geographic positions to locations in the image. Metadata is added describing the chart, its
datum, projection and other information about the chart and the digital file.

Hydrographic Chart Raster Format. (HCRF): This is the format developed by UKHO and used for its
Admiralty Raster Chart Service (ARCS) and the Australian HO for its Seafarer Chart Service. Raster
charts have the same standards of accuracy and reliability as paper charts. These are used with authorised
compatible Electronic Charting Systems (ECS).

BSB Format: The (BSB) format is basically one or more raster images compressed in to an efficient
package that is accompanied by the chart details within the package. These chart details include the geo
referencing required for determining latitude and longitude as well as other particulars such as, scale,
depth units, chart name, etc. The BSB format separates a chart into images depending on the number of
compartments a chart contains where a 'compartment' is defined as main chart, chart inset, and chart
continuation

2.9.2.5 Hybrid Charts

Ideally the master versions of all discrete digital cartographic product data would be held in vector form.
The rise in capacity of computer systems over recent years has opened up the alternative of transferring
quickly to digital methods by raster scanning the existing printing separates, and then using hybrid
raster/vector techniques during a changeover period. Raster masters are replaced by vector masters in a
sequence determined by costs and business priorities.

M-13
 29

ANNEX A

ACRONYMS

ARCS Admiralty Raster Chart Service

AHO Australian Hydrographic Office
CAD Computer aided drafting
CD Compact Disk
CDS Cartographic Digital Standards
DNC Digital Nautical Chart
ECS Electronic Charting System
ENC Electronic Navigation Chart
ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and Information System
GIS Geographic Information System
HCRF Hydrographic Chart Raster Format
HTF Hydrographic Transfer Format
HI Project Instruction/Hydrographic Instruction
IHO International Hydrographic Organisation
IMO International Maritime Organisation
NHO National Hydrographic Office
NIMA National Imagery and Mapping Agency
NIS Nautical Information System
NTM Notices to Mariners
QC Quality Control
RNC Raster Nautical Chart
SENC System Electronic Navigational Chart
UKHO United Kingdom Hydrographic Office
VRF Vector Relational Form
WGS World Geodetic System

M-13
 30

REFERENCES

D. Russom & H. R. “Some Basic Principles in the International Hydrographic Review,

W. Halliwell Compilation of Nautical Charts” Vol. LV No. 2, July 1978
William G. Swisher “National Ocean Survey Automated International Hydrographic Review,
Information System” Vol. LVIII No. 2, July 1981
N. M. Anderson “Computer Assisted Cartography in the International Hydrographic Review,
Canadian Hydrographic Service” Vol. LVIII No. 2, July 1981
Christer Palm “From Manuscript to Printed Chart” International Hydrographic Review,
Vol. LX No. 2, July 1982

Martin Joseph “Assessing the Precision of Depth Data” International Hydrographic Review,
Vol. LXVIII No. 2, July 1991

E. C. Bouwmeester “Optimal Line Spacing in Hydrographic International Hydrographic Review,

and A. W. Heemink Survey” Vol. LXX No. 1, March 1993
H. Gorziglia “Computer Assisted Cartography at International Hydrographic Review,
Hydrographic and Oceanographic Vol. LXX No, September 1993
Service of Chilean Navy”
Adam J. Kerr “Conceptual Model of a Regionally International Hydrographic Review,
Integrated Data Base For ECDIS” Vol. LXXI No. 2, September 1994
Udo Laube “The Hydrographic and Wrecksearch International Hydrographic Review,
Vessel “DENEB” as an Example for a Vol. LXXII No. 2, March 1995
Modern Survey Vessel”
B. Bourgeois, F. “A GIS Integration Approach for The Hydrographic Journal, January
Petry, M. Harris & Dynamically Reconfigurable Surveys” 1999.
P. Alleman

Patrick McGlamery “Issues of Authenticity of Spatial Data” 66th IFLA Council and General
Conference 2000.

Neal G. Millet and “Hydrographic Management using GIS U.S. Hydrographic Conference
Simon Evans Technologies” 2001.
Lieutenant Eric J. “NOAA AHB Assurance Inspections for U.S. Hydrographic Conference
Sipos Contract Hydrographic Surveys” 2001.
Lt Cdr Luis Pais “Production and Distribution of ENC – U.S. Hydrographic Conference
The Portuguese experience” 2001.

M-13
 31

URL ADDRESSES

1. Ames Remote http://www.amesremote.com

2. Caris Marine http://www.caris.com

3. Coastal Oceanographic, Inc http://www.coastalo.comNational

4. ESRI Software http://www.esri.com/library/

5. Federal Geographic Data Committee http://fgdc.er.usgs.gov/fgdc.html

6. Hydrographic Society of America http://www.thsoa.org

7. Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) http://www.nima.mil

8. International Hydrographic Organisation http://www.iho.shom.fr/iho.html

9. JANUS Technologies http://www.janus-tech.com

10. NOAA National Coast Survey http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov

11. Offshore Systems Ltd. http://www.osl.com/corporate

12. Primar Organisation http://www.primar.org

12. SeaBeam Instruments http://www.seabeam.com/

13. Reson, Inc http://www.reson.com

14. The Laser-scan Ltd., http://www.Laser-Scan.com/papers

15. The GIS Primer http://www.innovativesgis.com

M-13
 32

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Admiralty “Manual of Hydrography” Vol I & Vol II

Bowditch “American Practical Navigator” U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office.
Admiralty “General Instructions for Hydrographic
Surveyors”
Karl B. Jeffers “Hydrographic Manual” U.S. Department of Commerce
IHO Special “IHO Standards for Hydrographic
Publication S-44 Surveys”
IHO Special “Spécifications for Chart Content and
Publication S-52 Display Aspects of ECDIS”
IHO Special “IHO Transfer Standards for Digital
Publication S-57 Hydrographic Data”

IHO Special “Product Specification for Raster

Publication S-61 Navigational Charts (RNC)”

IHO Circular Letter “Guidelines for the Processing of High Dated 5 Oct 2001.
45/2001 Volume Bathymetric Data”
“Map Compilation Color Separation and Headquarters Department of Army,
revision” Washington.
Colonnel Sir Charles “Text Book of Topographical and Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Close & Colonel H. Geographical Surveying”
St. J. L.
Winterbotham

__________

M-13