Maze Learning
Maze Learning
Maze Learning
Manual
for
HUMAN
MAZE
LEARNING
HML-Bv
Dr. Vivek Bhargava
Secretary
Harprasad Institute of Behavioural Studies
41-42, Hardeep Enclave, Sikandra
AGRA (U.P.)
OLOGIC
OR)
AG
T. M. Regd. No. 564838
Copyright Regd. No. O A-73256/2005 Dt. 13.5.05
An ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Company ISBN:978-93-85002-88-5
www.npcindia.com s: (0562) 2601080
Estd. 1971
NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION
Definition
lthe term very broadly in saying that
(1) J. P. Guilford (1956)-We may define
in behaviour resulting from behaviour".
change
Leaming is any
(1967)-"We may define Learning as
and Atkinson
a relatively
(2) Hilgard of praclice"
behaviour that occurs as the result
parmanent change in
Types of Learning
Theories of Learning
Later psychologists like Hull and Skinner though accepting the basic principle of
conditioning emphasise certain other factors like drive, reward, etc. in explaining the
learning process. Their approach is known as instrumental conditioning as opposed
to Pavlov's classical
conditioning.
A third group of psychologists mainly belonging of the Gestalt School disagreee
with the above approaches and stress the importance of what they call Insight. Some
psychologists like Tolman, take an intermediary position and accommodate both
conditioning and insightful learning. The Bulk of the psychologists today, however, agree
at learning of different types of skills cannot be explained by any single theory. They
Cognise more than one type of learning, like sign learning, response learning. etc.
of material some
Cxperiments in the field of learning have used a wide variety the
VOVing motor and muscular behaviour and others involving language. Among
for the learning experiments
Own pieces of apparatus that have been devised Lashelv
types of the Skinner problem box, the jumping stand, the
erent mazes,
Yerkes multiple choice apparatus etc.
4 Instructional Manual lor HML -BV
-
In his 1937 APA presidential address, the noted neobehaviorist Edward Chace
Tolman, PhD, made a startling claim: "Everything imporlant in psychology..can be
investigated in essence through the continued experimental and theoretical analysis
of the determinants of rat behavior at a choice-point in a maze."
Even in its day, this was quite an assertion: psychology boils down to what makes
a rat trun left or right in a maze. Tolman was known to overstate the case for effect, but
the quote does say something about the importance of maze leaning to psychological
scientists in the 1930s.
What are the origins of this iconic apparatus, and how did the maze come to be
held in such esteem ?
Most historians agree that the animal
maze was first developed at Clark University
in the late
1890s, in the laboratory of Edmund Sanford, PhD, in a
student, Willard Srmall. At about the
study by his graduate
same time, Edward Thorndike, of cats-in-puzzile
DOXes tame, had been experimenting with baby chicks in maze-like devices (he caled
them
pens') constructed by placing books on end in various
Clark experiments were the first real maze configurations, but tne
tradition that continues to studies. They launched a rats-in-tidEo
this day.
ne idea for the first maze study was sparked by a conversation between anford
and another Clark
graduate student, Linus Kline. Small and Kline were both
in the then-new
Darwin-inspired field of
interebeen
comparative psychology. They nau
ability,
ability, Kline
Kline told
told cspecially interested in what they called the rat's"home-finding
Sanford he had eir
SiS observed "runways...made by
under the porch of an old cabin on Ihisl larg
in Virginia. /hen these
ways Were exposed during an father's farm
suggested to Sanford using the excavation. their maze-like appearance din
Hampto
npton Court Maze design to study
Instructional Manual for HML-Bv 5
At that time, the Hampton Court Maze in England was a popular tourist
ston
araiuably the world's most famous hedge maze. it was part of the sprawling attraction
ofHamoton Court, just outside London, built as a home away from throne for the British
ral familv. Built in 1690, the maze consists of twists and turns and six-foot-tall
hedges
that continue to perplex visitors today. At the time of his conversation with Kline, Sanford
had iust returned from London; it is conceivable that he had visited the maze on
that
trip.
Whatever the origins of Sanford's suggestion, the Clark lab soon had its own mini-
version of the Hampton Court Maze, redesigned slightly to make it
rectangular instead
of trapezoidal. The 6' x 8' maze had a wooden floor and wire mesh walls. Small became
the lead researcher on the project when Kline had to step
away for other research. In
1899, Small began his research, publishing his results two years later. This was a time
when psychology was the science of mental life, so it is not
surprising that Smal
described his maze study in "mentalistic" terms, rather than in the kind of
language
one might expect to read in a more modern
"learning" study. So instead of reporting
results in terms of error rates and time to completion, Small ried to infer what the rats
were doing as they made their way through the maze.
Although Small was criticized by Thorndike for being overly anthropomorphic, his
resulits make for fascinating reading. For example, describing a rat almost making a
wrong turn, he wrote that the rat "hesitated as if 'scratching his head, then entered this
dead end path] slowly and doubtfully-only a few steps, however; then with a sudden
turn and a triumphant flick of his tail he returned to the correct path" (Small, 1901).
Despite the anthropomorphism, Small made important observations that were
verified by subsequent studies. For instance, two of his rats were blind, yet they leamed
then maze just as easily as their sighted compatriots.Small's conclusions that vision
Was not needed to learn the maze, and that learning resulted from "the gradual
and motor responses
establishment of direct associations" between maze stimuli
were supported a few years later
in a famous series of studies by
(Small, 1901),
behaviorism's founder, John Watson.
Watson thought,
complex than either Small
or
learning
Maze turned out to be more
than for the fact that it initiated
a
Small's work is less important for its conclusions
but decades, versions of the Hampton
of research using mazes. Over the next few
flood the academic landscape,
Court Maze and many variations of it appeared throughout
6 Instructional Manual for HML-Bv
as research ----
psychologists used the maze to explore the basic
Rats weren't the only subjects making their way through the proCesses of learning
twists and a ing
maze studies appearing, ranging from
began simple table-op devices that blindiolded
humans tried to learn by runninga stylus through grooves cut
mazes in the spirit of Hampton Court.
into wood, to hurnani
One such study wasattempted by E.G. Boring. psychology's famous historian.
a graduate student at Cornell, the center of Titchenerian
As
intrOspective peycholooy
Boring constructed an outdoor maze similar to the Hampton maze but with a
circutar
design ("walls" were created with wooden stakes and wire). Blindfolded, Boring and
several fellow grad students wound their way through the maze,
ratting off introspective
reports about theexperience they went along. They even tied sacks of flour to their
as
backs with holes piercing the bottom so they could later trace their progress (if only
they had taken pictures).The results were inconclusive. Boring later said that the main
outcome of his only maze study was that the fell in love with one of his fellow
maze
running colleagues, Lucy Day, whom he eventually married.
Mazes reached their experimental heyday in the 1930s and 1940s, when Tolman
could claim that rat behavior at a choice point was the
key to psychological knowledge
and not be laughed off the stage. In those
days, mazes were the apparatus of choice
in the battles among competing learning theorists (e.g., Tolman, Hull). Today, mazes
continue to be used by experimental psychologists. The goal is no longer to understand
maze learning perse; rather, the maze is just another useful tool for examining such
topics as drug effects and spatial memory.
Yet the maze holds an exalted
position in psychology's history, thanks to Kline's
t comments about rats burrowing under a
and Small's landmark
porch, Sanford's knowledge of Hampton Count,
study.
a The T-maze is one of a
group of various mazes of differing sizes and many sriapes.
i s one of the most simple, consisting of justtwo turns- right or left. The maze is
S only able to be altered by
blocking one of the two paths.The basis behind tne i-nia
al IS to place the
rat at the base of
the maze, By placing a reward at one arm or DO
arms or the
maze, the rat must make the
ru made by the rat choice of which path to take. Ine dt
can be a cause
of a natural oreterence within the rat. AS0uy
Su
iernaton can be performed by repeating the experiment multiple times with no
rewan
Gner arm
of the maze. Another experiment that can he performed is the alternauo
Instructional Manual lor HML-Bv 7
r d s each time the experiment is performed, proving the rat will choose the arm
the experiment starts.
not visited each time
that was
Rewards within the rats can be types of food, another rat within a cage, an odor, or
detemined. Examples of this could be a rat's food preferences, its familiarity with
Specific smells and scents, the attraction of the male and female within the maze, and
whether a young rat prefers an aduit female or an adult male. These simple experiments
can determine the rat's psyche on multiple subjects, and ultimately divulge further into
the rat's psychological characteristics. It is also important to consider the rodent's
behaviour. The use of spatial and non-spatial cues is very influential to research findings
on memory, spatial learning and the long-term potential (LTP). These cues include the
orientation of the maze, extra-maze cues and room configuration cues. Strategies
may be affected by the rodent's ability to find cues in the room, the presence of absence
of polarizing cues in the room, and the stability of the maze in the room. When analyzing
and interpreting experimental data, researchers have to consider the orientation and
configuration of the apparatus and cues in the room.
Hypothesis
There is a positive effect of practice on learning process.
Variables
Experimental Instructions
Following instructions were given to the subject before starting the experiment:
(1) Start moving forward by touching different points of the Maze Learning by Stylus
on hearing indication of 'Start".
(2) During experiment you take stylus/finger on the point just above or below that
point or point just on right or left from that point.
(3) You will not take stylus/finger on any point or transversely.
(4) You will not leave any point while doing work.
(5) You have to move forward by touching only those points by which bulb does not
glow.
(6) If bulb glows on touching any point by stylus, bring back stylus to that immediate
point from which you lifted the stylus.
(7) During different efforts of the experiment you have to work as above and have
to reach that last point line on which 'aim
point (end) is written by touching right
points (bulb not glowing) with the stylus.
(8) During experiment keep strict sight on glowing of bulb. Write your that error 0.1
which bulb glows on touching the point.
Experimental Method
First of all subject kept his stylus/finger on starting point and started efforts for
reaching the aim. In finger maze (wooden) error was noted on finger touching the
bOundry of grooved track or going on wrong track and in maze simple this action was
repeated with stylus. Similar action was repeated in Maze T-shaped Electrical. In other,
Maze (Maze Learning pointed electrical. Maze Learning electrical with reset counter,
Maze Learning electronic with reset counter) error was noted on glowing of bulb or by
counter. In pointed maze we moved right or left and above or below on glowing of bulb
not transversely. Similarly 20 efforts are done.
10 Instructional Manual for
*:"".".
HML-Bv
Results Table
Trial Time(Sec.)Errors Trial Time (Sec.)| Errors
1 11
2 12
3 13
4 14
5 15
16
17
8 18
9 19
10 20
Statistical Analysis
Mean of First Three Trials of Time M= ZX
N
Conclusion
Accroding to the results, we accept/reject
our hypothesis.