1 s2.0 S1359836816310939 Main
1 s2.0 S1359836816310939 Main
1 s2.0 S1359836816310939 Main
Composites Part B
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesb
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In the present paper fatigue behavior of glass/epoxy composite materials under different stress ratios and
Received 20 June 2016 for various plies orientation angles has been established. Experimental and numerical analysis (Finite
Received in revised form Element Method) were performed on various specimens subjected to cyclic tensile tests in order to
21 September 2016
outline the influences of stress ratios and the stacking sequence ([02/902]s; [902/02]s; [03/90]s; [903/0]s)
Accepted 16 October 2016
Available online 20 October 2016
on glass/epoxy fatigue properties. Static analysis is done experimentally to identify the stress-strain
diagrams, strain to failure, Young's modulus and tensile strength for each stacking sequence. Compari-
son between experimental and numerical prediction show good agreement. The Results of this inves-
Keywords:
Composite
tigation can lead us to choose the most optimal stacking sequence for giving boundary conditions to
Fatigue achieve the maximum fatigue life.
Stress ratio © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Stacking sequence
Finite element method
1. Introduction interface properties). Many studies [1e3] shows that the fatigue
behavior of composite materials is mainly due to the stiffness
The increased demand for composites is mainly due to their changes during cycles, which can be divided into three stages: the
variant applications in several areas in which lightness, rigidity and first stage is characterized by a rapid decrease in stiffness and the
good resistance to damage are requested. Their use became more formation of ‘‘damage zones’’ with multiple microscopic crack.
and more important in a wide range of structural components After in the second stage the stiffness degradation became lower
which must withstand various types of constant and variable and substantially linear in function of the number of cycles, more
amplitude fatigue loads, such on the construction of several serious types of damage appears such emergence and growth of
frameworks in various areas (buildings, public works and delamination, this stage lasts about 90% of the total life. Finally the
transportations). third stage is characterized by a high level of stiffness degradation
The glass/epoxy material is one of the most used composite, associated with a rapid development of all types of fatigue damage,
especially in aerospace and automotive applications, due to their including fiber/matrix interface failure and fiber fracture leading to
high mechanical performances and low specific weight comparing an accelerated decline. Authors [4e9] have investigated the various
to other materials. In that fact, engineers and research scientists are parameters (ply-drop configuration, number of plies dropped at
required to reconsider fatigue loading as an important factor which one location, stress ratios, laminate thickness, fabric type, loading
may lead to the fracture of this composite. Therefore, mechanical condition, fiber content) influencing the fatigue properties of
properties of glass/epoxy composite were a subject of thorough and composite structures. Brillaud and El Mahi [10] show the significant
extensive studies. However, it's more complex to characterize their influence of stacking sequence on transverse ply cracking in com-
fatigue behavior comparing to metal materials due to their micro- posite laminates subjected to cyclic and repeated fatigue tests. Th.
structural composition (anisotropy, heterogeneity, fiber/matrix Johannesson [11] experimentally investigates the fatigue strain
limit of glass fiber/epoxy composite, in order to determine the in-
fluence of improved ductility of the matrix material on the strain
* Corresponding author. limits. F. Wu and Plumtree [12e14] have studied the damage
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.044
1359-8368/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
W. Roundi et al. / Composites Part B 109 (2017) 64e71 65
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the specimen dimensions used for static and fatigue tests (in mm).
evolution in a [±45]2S CFRP laminate under block loading condi- description and characterization of effects of the applied stress
tions and damage development in carbon fiber epoxy laminates ratios on the glass/epoxy fatigue proprieties. In this way specimens
during fatigue tests. were submitted to cyclic loading under various stress ratios
In that reason the aim of this study is to highlight at first the (R ¼ 0.1; R ¼ 0.2; R ¼ 0.3; R ¼ 0.4; R ¼ 0.5). Afterward, a finite
influence of the stacking sequence on the fatigue behavior of a element analysis was carried out to predict the fatigue behavior of
glass/epoxy composite submitted to cyclic tensile tests. Specimens specimens under similar conditions used in the experimental part,
have been manufactured with different stacking sequences ([02/ with the same stacking sequences and applied stress ratio values.
902]s; [902/02]s; [03/90]s; [903/0]s), in order to observe the impact of Numerical obtained results will be compared and validate with
this geometric parameter in damage and crack development due to experimental data.
fatigue. The second part of the experimental study will focus on the
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of the four studied stacking sequences (in mm).
66 W. Roundi et al. / Composites Part B 109 (2017) 64e71
Table 1 Three to five specimens were tested for each test in order to check
Mechanical properties of Glass fiber. the validity of the results. The tests were carried out with a tensile
Glass fiber properties machine equipped with a 100 kN load cell. The strains in the tensile
Areal Tensile Poisson's Strain to Tensile
direction were measured by means of an extensometer with a
density strength ratio failure modulus gauge length of 50 mm. The static tests were performed with a
displacement rate of 1 mm/min. The fatigue tests were performed
300 g/m2 2500 0.25 4.8% 74 GPa
MPa using sinusoidal waveform with load control at a frequency of 10 Hz
for all the tests. Specimens were tested under various maximum
stress levels (smax). The applied stress ratio RF (ratio between the
Table 2 minimum and maximum applied stress: RF ¼ smin/smax) was varied
Mechanical properties of Epoxy resin. from 0.1 to 0.5 (R1 ¼ 0.1; R2 ¼ 0.2; R3 ¼ 0.3; R4 ¼ 0.4; R5 ¼ 0.5). All
the fatigue tests were carried out until the failure of specimens. The
Epoxy resin properties
results allow us to plot the Wo €hler curves for the different com-
Young's Modulus Tensile strength Flexural strength
posites combinations and the fatigue life under the various stress
2900 MPa 74 MPa 310 MPa ratios. Afterward, special interest was focused on the analysis of all
the obtained results to deduce the influence of these parameters on
the fatigue behavior and damage development on the tested
2. Material and manufacturing specimens.
s0 f
εa ¼ ð2NÞb þ ε0 f ð2NÞc (1)
E
Where:
Fig. 5. Stress e Strain curves for the different stacking sequences: a) [02/902]s, b) [902/902]s, c) [03/90]s and d) [903/0]s.
Fig. 6. Static properties: a) Tensile Strength, b) Young's Modulus.
€ hler curves for different stacking sequences (R ¼ 0.1): a) [02/902]s, b) [902/02]s, c) [03/90]s and d) [903/0]s.
Fig. 7. Wo
W. Roundi et al. / Composites Part B 109 (2017) 64e71 69
Table 3 results), which exceeds the results obtained for the three others
Experimental results of the mean values of fatigue life for the four stacking se- sequences (see Fig. 7). The Gap increase when specimens are sub-
quences (R ¼ 0.1).
mitted to lower cyclic loading. It's also observed that specimens
Applied Stress 130 MPa 175 MPa 260 MPa 305 MPa 350 MPa with the stacking sequences [903/0]s have the lowest fatigue
Sequences strength among the four composites (Table 3).
At applied stresses above the fatigue limit, fracture of specimens
[02/902]s 106 8.7 104 2 103 8 102 5 102
[902/02]s 106 6.2 104 1.5 103 5 102 3 102 was observed. The proposed results show that with decreasing of
[03/90]s 106 2.6 105 1.3 104 8 103 4.3 103 the applied stress, Wo€hler curves obtained from experimental and
[903/0]s 4 103 4 102 0 0 0 numerical fatigue tests for different stacking sequences converge
and the percentage gap will be less. Three fatigue life behaviors
namely low-cycle, high-cycle and infinite life can be distinguished.
c is the Fatigue Ductility Exponent, slope of the static strain line All predictions of the applied stress versus cycles to failure
(Coffin eManson's exponent). curves are rearranged into the form of Basquin's formula, as
expressed in Eq. (2). Where sa is the applied stress, A and b are
respectively the constant and the curve exponent, N is the number
5. Results and discussions of cycles (Basquin's equations are shown on the curves).
Fig. 8. Fatigue life under R ¼ 0.1 and smax ¼ 390 MPa for [902/02]s composite.
70 W. Roundi et al. / Composites Part B 109 (2017) 64e71
Fig. 9. Lifetime vs Apllied stress ratios for different stacking sequences: a) [02/902] s, b) [902/02]s, c) [03/90]s and d) [903/0]s.
6. Conclusion composites. For structures under higher applied stress, it's more
adequate to use the [03/90]s fiber orientations to achieve the
Fatigue tests under various stress ratio levels have been inves- maximum fatigue life. This study also highlights the strong influ-
tigated. Fatigue behavior of different stacking sequences has been ence of the stress ratio R on glass/epoxy lifetime, and put in light
compared. The Results show the significant effect of fiber orienta- the harmful impact of the stiffness degradation on fatigue strength.
tion angle on the static and fatigue performances of glass/epoxy Therefore, it's essential to choose the suitable glass/epoxy
Fig. 10. Damage evolution in the glass/epoxy specimens during fatigue tests.
W. Roundi et al. / Composites Part B 109 (2017) 64e71 71
composite configuration for each application. sequence on transverse ply cracking in composite laminates. Compos Struct
1991;17(1):23e35.
Good agreement with experiment suggests that the glass/epoxy
[11] Johannesson Th. Fatigue strength of glass fiber/epoxy angle.ply laminates with
behavior is being correctly modeled by the numerical finite different matrix ductility. Mech Compos Mater 1993;28(5):439e44.
element analysis. [12] Wu F, Yao W. A fatigue damage model of composite materials. Int J Fatigue
2010;32(1):134e8.
[13] Plumtree A, Melo M, Dahl J. Damage evolution in a [±45]2S CFRP laminate
References under block loading conditions. Int J Fatigue 2010;32(1):139e45.
[14] Talreja R. Damage and fatigue in composites e a personal account. Compos Sci
[1] El Mahi A, Berthelot J-M, Brillaud J. Stiffness reduction and energy release rate Technol 2008;68(13):2585e91.
of cross-ply laminates during fatigue tests. Compos Struct 1995;30:123e30. [15] Downing SD, Socie DF. Simple rainflow counting algorithms. Int J Fatigue
[2] Kashtalyan M, Soutis C. Stiffness degradation in cross-ply laminates damaged 1982;4(1):31e40.
by transverse cracking and splitting. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf [16] Olagnon Gue de
Z. Rainflow fatigue analysis for loads with multimodal power
2000;31(4):335e51. spectral densities. Mar Struct 2008;21(2e3):160e76.
[3] Zhang Y, Vassilopoulos AP, Keller T. Stiffness degradation and fatigue life [17] Marsh G, Wignall C,R, Thies P, Barltrop N, Incecik A, Venugopal V, et al. Review
prediction of adhesively-bonded joints for fiber-reinforced polymer compos- and application of Rainflow residue processing techniques for accurate fatigue
ites. Int J Fatigue 2008;30(10e11):1813e20. damage estimation. Int J Fatigue 2016;82(2):757e65.
[4] Khan R, Alderliesten R, Badshah S, Benedictus R. Effect of stress ratio or mean [18] Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress. Jpn Soc
stress on fatigue delamination growth in composites: critical review. Compos Mech Eng 1968:37e40.
Struct 2015;124:214e27. [19] Browell R, Hancq A. The ANSYS fatigue module: calculating and displaying
[5] Botting AD, Vizzini AJ, Lee SW. Effect of ply-drop configuration on delami- fatigue results. 2006.
nation strength of tapered composite structures. AIAA J 1996;34(8):1650e6. [20] Dowling NE. Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stressestrain his-
[6] Andersons J, Hojob M, Ochiaic S. Empirical model for stress ratio effect on tories. J Mater 1972;7(1):71e87.
fatigue delamination growth rate in composite laminates. Int J Fatigue [21] Amzallag C, Gerey JP, Robert JL, Bahuaud J. Standardization of the rainflow
2004;26(6):597e604. counting method for fatigue analysis. Int J Fatigue 1994;16(4):287e93.
[7] Mili F, Necib B. The effect of stacking sequence on the impact-induced damage [22] Colombia P, Dolin ~ skib K. Fatigue lifetime of welded joints under random
in cross ply E-glass/epoxy composites plates. Archive Appl Mech 2009;79(11): loading: rainflow cycle vs. cycle sequence method. Probabilistic Eng Mech
1019e31. 2001;16:61e71.
[8] Bedewi NE, Kung DN. Effect of fatigue loading on the modal properties of [23] Rychlik I, Gupta S. Rain-flow fatigue damage for transformed gaussian loads.
composite structures and its utilization for prediction of residual life. Compos Int J Fatigue 2007;29(3):406e20.
Struct 1997;37(3e4):357e71. [24] Martin JF. Cyclic Stress-Strain behavior and fatigue resistance of two struc-
[9] Rebiere J-L, Gamby D. Analytical and numerical analysis of transverse cracking tural steels. University of illinois at urbana-champaign; 1973. Fracture control
in a cross-ply laminate. Influence of the constraining effect. Compos Struct program report no.9.
1992;20(2):91e101.
[10] Brillaud J. El Mahi a. Numerical simulation of the influence of stacking