240-129686484 Minimum Level of Automation
240-129686484 Minimum Level of Automation
240-129686484 Minimum Level of Automation
Revision: 1
Total Pages: 28
Supported by SCOT SC
…………………………………..
Dr. Craig Boesack
Power Plant C&I SC Chair
Date: ……………………………
CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
2. SUPPORTING CLAUSES ........................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Applicability................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 4
2.2.1 Normative .................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.2.2 Informative ................................................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Disclosure Classification ........................................................................................................................... 7
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 7
2.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................... 8
2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................................... 8
3. LEVEL OF AUTOMATION TECHNICAL DISCUSSION ......................................................................................... 9
3.1 CONTROL CONCEPT ...................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 ANALOGUE (MODULATING) CONTROL ...................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Hierarchical levels for analogue control .................................................................................................. 10
3.2.1.1 Unit Control Level ............................................................................................................................ 10
3.2.1.2 Group Control Level (GC) analogue controls .................................................................................. 10
3.2.1.3 Sub-group Control Level (SGC) analogue control. ......................................................................... 10
3.2.1.4 Drive Control Level (For Analogue and Binary control). ................................................................. 11
3.3 BINARY (SEQUENCE) CONTROL. ................................................................................................................ 13
3.3.1 Hierarchical levels for binary control ....................................................................................................... 13
3.3.1.1 Unit Control level for binary control ................................................................................................. 13
3.3.1.2 Group Control level (GC) for binary control .................................................................................... 13
3.3.1.3 Sub-group Control level (SGC) for binary control ........................................................................... 14
3.3.1.4 Auxiliary Group Control Level (AXGC) for binary control ................................................................ 14
3.3.1.5 Drive Control Level for Binary Control. ........................................................................................... 14
3.4 LEVEL OF AUTOMATION – MINIMUM ESKOM OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ................................... 16
3.4.1 Typical Unit Start-ups – Cold, Warm and Hot. ........................................................................................ 16
3.4.1.1 Unit sequencer ................................................................................................................................ 16
3.4.1.2 Unit Start-up sequences .................................................................................................................. 17
3.4.2 Typical BOP Plant Start-up operations ................................................................................................... 18
3.4.3 Unit: Normal Shut-Down .......................................................................................................................... 18
3.4.4 BOP: Normal Shut-Down ........................................................................................................................ 18
3.4.5 Unit: Emergency Shut-Down ................................................................................................................... 18
3.4.5.1 Scenario 1 - Boiler trip (with Turbine Inter-trip) and auxiliary power available. .............................. 18
3.4.5.2 Scenario 2 - Boiler trip (with Turbine Inter-trip) no auxiliary power except for essential power
for critical drives. .................................................................................................................................... 19
3.4.5.3 Scenario 3 – When power is restored after a unit black-out ........................................................... 19
3.4.5.4 Scenario 4 - When power is restored after a Power Station black-out ........................................... 19
3.4.6 Redundant Plant on standby ................................................................................................................... 19
3.4.6.1 Redundant Main Plant on standby .................................................................................................. 19
3.4.6.2 Redundant Auxiliary Plant on standby ............................................................................................ 19
3.4.7 Modes of Unit Operation ......................................................................................................................... 20
3.4.7.1 Co-ordinated Boiler Follow mode .................................................................................................... 20
3.4.7.2 Co-ordinated Turbine Follow mode ................................................................................................. 20
3.4.7.3 Other Modes of Unit Operation ....................................................................................................... 20
3.4.8 Unit Co-ordinator ..................................................................................................................................... 20
3.4.8.1 Unit Co-ordination during start-ups ................................................................................................. 20
3.4.8.2 Unit Co-ordination during load operation ........................................................................................ 21
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 3 of 28
FIGURES
Figure 1: Hierarchical structure of a Control System .................................................................................................... 9
Figure 2: Example of an analogue hierarchical structure (Unit Control) .................................................................... 12
Figure 3: Example of a binary hierarchical structure (Unit Control) ........................................................................... 15
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 4 of 28
1. INTRODUCTION
The level of automation at Eskom’s existing coal-fired power station fleet is high, considering the
technologies that were available when they were built (1970s-1990s). DCS technology available today
affords the control engineer an opportunity to provide highly automated start-up and shutdown control
strategies for operations.
Changes in the industry have stimulated interest in plant automation. Base load stations are being used
in cycling service and two shift operation. Modern DCS are easily able to accommodate additional IO
required for start-up and shutdown automation and have extended functionality to be able to keep the
operator informed of start-up and shutdown progress. The demands of reliability and availability on our
plant and the introduction of legislation which governs the minimum network connection conditions (the
South African Grid Code), requires a certain level of automation from our new plant that must not
compromise on operational flexibility, reliability and availability of the plant.
Power plant automation requires significant investment for implementation and therefore, cost savings
from improved operations (Consistent best practice operation, optimised start-up and shutdown times,
real-time operator guidance) need to justify this investment.
2. SUPPORTING CLAUSES
2.1 SCOPE
This guideline covers the typical level of automation typically expected at an Eskom Coal Fired Power
Plant with a focus on the Control System hierarchical structures and operational requirements.
2.1.1 Purpose
Eskom Power Station plant designs vary widely from station to station including the level of automation
that was implemented at the station at the time of construction. This document describes to the reader
the minimum level of automation for Eskom power plants expected to achieve ESKOM’s operational
requirements for high plant reliability, availability and flexibility.
2.1.2 Applicability
This document applies to Unitised (Boiler and Turbine) and Balance of plant control systems of the coal
fleet of power stations at Eskom Holdings SOC for Greenfield (New) and Brownfield (Refurbishment)
projects. While this document provides examples for supercritical boilers, the requirements apply to drum
type boilers as well.
2.2.1 Normative
[1] VGB R 170Ce: Function-related documentation of power plant instrumentation and control in line
with operational requirements.
[2] VGB R 170B2e: Design standards for instrumentation and control equipment-Automation function.
[3] VGB B 106B4e: Identification of instrumentation and control tasks/functions in process systems
and identification of functions in instrumentation and control systems.
[4] 240-56030600: Steam Turbine Unit Islanding, Load Rejection and Speed Control Verification
Standard.
[5] 240-105453648: Fossil Fuel Firing Regulations Standard
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 5 of 28
2.2.2 Informative
[6] Chambers Dictionary of Science and Technology – 2007 edition.
[7] Automation of Fossil Plant Startup/Shutdown, Instrumentation and Controls Technology
Assessment, 1015710. Technical Update, March 2009, EPRI.
[8] 240 - 119416400 Generation AGC Design Standard for Power Plants
[9] The South African Grid Code as specified in the terms of the South African Electricity Regulation
Act
[10] SPC 46-8: Certification and Performance Monitoring Of Generation Reserves - System Operations
and Planning Procedure.
2.3 DEFINITIONS
Automation
Industrial closed-loop control system in which manual operation of controls is replaced by servo
operation.
Balance of Plant
The Balance of Plant refers to the supporting process plant that are common to all unitised process plant
areas of a Power Station. The balance of plant is required to be operational for the unit plants (Boiler and
Turbine) to operate. For Coal Fired Power Stations the balance of plant typically includes the following
plant areas:
Water Treatment plant including Condensate Polishing Plant
Coal Handling Plant
Ash Handling Plant
Low Pressure Services:
Compressor Plant
Auxiliary Cooling plant
Demineralised, Potable and Raw Water Distribution Plant
Fuel Oil Plant
Flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) plant
Decentralised control system structure
A control system structure in which the software is functionally distributed at all hierarchical levels of
control.
Level of Automation
The level of automation states the general functions and the structure of automation of a power plant
(technological) process.
Operating Modes
Where local control in the plant is required, three distinct modes of operation are provided at control
system level to the control room operator: Remote (also referred to Automatic), Remote Manual and
Local Manual. Selection of the mode of control can be available at group, sub group, auxiliary group and
drive level depending on the particular process plant at hand. For the Local Manual Control Mode, a
Local Control Station (LCS) or Local Control Panel (LCP) is provided to the local operator. The LCS /
LCP typically have the following operating modes: Remote, Local and Maintenance. Sections 3.5.1,
3.5.2 and 3.5.3 detail the operating modes further.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 6 of 28
Hierarchical structure
The control system is divided into several control levels forming a hierarchical structure, as shown in
Figure 1.
Unit
A unit is a steam generator, steam turbine-alternator and all the related equipment, including the step-up
transformer, operating together to produce electricity.
Unit co-ordinator
The Unit co-ordinator, residing within the highest automation level for a unit, co-ordinates the unit and
includes a unit start-up and shut-down sequencer and handling of major disturbances via capability
computation.
Supervised Fully Automatic
The term “supervised fully automatic” refers to an operating scenario where the operator monitors the
sequence steps of the fully automatic start-up or shut-down sequence. The sequence steps will typically
have hold points, where essential plant parameters to be aligned and checked or actions required by the
operator, (with the possibility of hold points being programmed) will be implemented in the start-up and
shut-down sequences.
Operator guide
A function within an automation Group or Sub-group sequencer that allows the operator to temporarily
pause a start-up or shut-down sequence at the specific step that the programme is in. This function
negates having to stop a running step programme completely and having to restart it from the first step.
Automatic Generation Control AGC – (Not to be confused with Auxiliary Group Control AXGC)
This is the automatic centralised closed loop control of generating units by means of the computerised
Energy Management System (EMS), currently TEMSE, at National Control. The AGC control system
regulates the system frequency during normal conditions by adjusting the power set-points of individual
generators.
Primary Frequency Control – Instantaneous Reserve
Primary Frequency Control is the automatic adjustment of a generator output (or customer load
reduction) in response to deviations in the system frequency, by means of the local governor control
system of the turbine. This control is proportional to the system frequency deviation. The governor dead
band is set at 0.15Hz.
Secondary frequency control – Regulating reserve
Secondary Frequency Control is mainly performed via automatic control of generator outputs to provide
a balance between the supply and demand in a control area. Automatic control is performed by the
Automatic Generation Control (AGC) system at the National Control Centre.
Dead band
With reference to Primary Frequency Control, dead band is the maximum frequency range over which
there is no automatic adjustment of the generator output or governing response.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 7 of 28
Unit Islanding
Unit Islanding is the ability of a generating unit to suddenly disconnect from the Transmission System by
opening the High Voltage breaker and to control all the necessary critical parameters automatically to a
sufficient degree to maintain the turbine generator at speed and excited and supplying its own auxiliary
load.
Load Rejection
Load Rejection is the separation of a unit from the Transmission System by the opening of the generator
breaker after which the turbine returns to nominal synchronous speed.
Permissive Interlocks
Logic intended to be fulfilled in order for a drive to accept a start of stop command. e.g Start and Stop
Permissives.
Drive Protection
Logic utilised to initiate a trip of the related drive. e.g. Safety OFF.
Definition Description
Approved by The accountability of the Approver of the document is equivalent to the
specified role of Functional Responsible/Owner as identified in 240-
53114186 and 32-6 for Documents and Records Management.
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Description
AGC Automatic Generation Control
AXGC Auxiliary Group Control
BOP Balance Of Plant
CPP Condensate Polishing Plant
FFFR Fossil Fuel Firing Regulations
FGD Flue-gas desulfurization
GC Group Control
HMI Human Machine Interface
IO Input/Output
LCP Local Control Panel
LCS Local Control Station
LOA Level of Automation
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
SGC Sub-Group Control
UC Unit Co-ordinator
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 8 of 28
UNIT CONTROL
LEVEL
GROUP CONTROL
LEVEL
SUB-GROUP
CONTROL LEVEL
AUXILIARY GROUP
CONTROL LEVEL
DRIVE CONTROL
LEVEL
PLANT INTERFACES
Figure 1: Hierarchical structure of a Control System
The control system is divided into several control levels or layers. The higher the control level, the higher
the degree of automation, and the lesser the degree of manual control interventions will be necessary. A
higher level of control introduces operational comfort and brings in a higher degree of controllability and
safety to a complex process, as the system will react automatically in the specified manner, should any
abnormal condition be detected.
Each hierarchical control level has its own specific tasks and always depends on the subordinated lower
control levels. If a higher control level fails, the next lower control level will not be affected and will allow
the levels to control the power plant with full controllability and safety, but this state will require additional
supervision and/or manual interventions by the operator.
Hierarchical structures as shown in figure 1 ensure a higher level of operational flexibility. Manual
interventions at all levels of control should be possible at any time, without any specific operations
necessary on the superimposed levels, such as transfer from automatic to manual. This will eliminate the
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 10 of 28
operational risk of operating a complex plant in full manual mode, when the operator only requires
making a single or a limited number of operational interventions.
In the hierarchical structure the auxiliary group control level may or may not be required and will be used
where necessary.
BOP: Water Treatment Plant: Demineralised water production trains, Individual Compressor and Dryers,
Coal/Ash Conveyors streams
UNIT CO-
ORDINATOR
Hot PA damper
FW Valve A control
FW Valve B control
Figure 2: Example of an analogue hierarchical structure (Unit Control)
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 13 of 28
The Balance of Plant process plants in the above examples, in particular, have plant sections that reside
in the units and that serve as a common plant:
The CPP plant consists of the CPP unit plant and the CPP regeneration plant in the Water Treatment
Plant area that functions as a common plant for the unit CPPs. The sequence control of the CPP plant is
however typically still fully controlled by the Water Treatment plant control system and supervised by the
Water Treatment Plant operator. A similar methodology applies for the sample analysis plant, which also
consists of unitised plant and common plant. The Water Treatment Plant control system, supervised by
the WTP operator, makes control decisions, such as increasing or decreasing the chemical dosing set-
points, based on the sample analysis measurements taken in the unitised plant.
GROUP CONTROL
GROUP CONTROL BOILER FEED PUMPS
LAY00EA100
LEVEL
SELECTOR
LAY00EA111
A B C
SUB-GROUP
START-UP PROGRAMME
LAY10EA001
Start-
down
Shut-
up
SHUT-DOWN PROGRAMME
LAY10EA051
LEVEL
AGC
DRIVE CONTROL (DC) LEVEL
BFP A 11 KV CB
11BBA02GS301
BFP A DIS VLV
LAB30AA003Y
BFP A DRIVE
LAB11AA001
LAB10AA003
BPA10AP071
LAB11AP001
LAC10AP202
LAC10AP203
LAC10AP201
LAC10AP001
Figure 3: Example of a binary hierarchical structure (Unit Control)
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 16 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 17 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 18 of 28
A start-up initiation of a main group via SGC will place the drives and lower level AXGC into operation
through an automatic sequence. When the last sequence step is completed, the entire main group is
deemed to be fully in operation.
Typically main groups may be in operation independently from other main groups and these can be
started by the operator from the respective group control level, as per the plant area start-up procedure.
The start-up of the Balance of Plant is performed by operators located in the Outside Plant and Water
Treatment Control rooms. One operator is dedicated to control the Coal, Ash and Low Pressure Services
plants in the Outside Control Room. The other operator is dedicated to control the Water Treatment
Plant in the Water Treatment Plant Control Room. Power Stations equipped with Flue-gas
desulfurization technology have a dedicated control room and FGD plant operator.
3.4.5.1 Scenario 1 - Boiler trip (with Turbine Inter-trip) and auxiliary power available.
The automation system must automatically safeguard the plant without any operator intervention. Trips
are usually initiated by a protection system such as the Boiler Protection System or Turbine Protection
system independent of the Control System.
Boiler: the automation system must maintain the boiler secondary air flow at the value prior to the trip
and then reduce or increase the total air flow to minimum as required by the FFFR. The Mills must
automatically be shutdown per requirements as laid down by the Boiler OEM.
Status feedbacks are required in order to obtain the releases required to proceed with the Post Boiler
Trip Purge. Under this scenario, Post Boiler Trip Purge is then manually initiated.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 19 of 28
Turbine: Following a boiler trip, the turbine trip is immediately initiated automatically (turbine emergency
stop valves trip close) and the generator breaker is opened when reverse power is detected. All turbine
plant and auxiliaries are kept in service or automatically shut down, as required for safe plant shut-down.
If a restart is decided, the unit sequencer will be used to restart the unit.
3.4.5.2 Scenario 2 - Boiler trip (with Turbine Inter-trip) no auxiliary power except for essential
power for critical drives.
Boiler and turbine essential plant as defined by the boiler and turbine OEM’s will automatically be driven
to the status that is safe for the unit. This operation must not require any operator initiation.
Auxiliaries required for the safe run-down of the plant, for example emergency lube oil pumps, will be
started automatically.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 20 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 21 of 28
will be ready for Co-ordinated Boiler Follow mode of operation, provided the boiler firing and turbine load
demands are matched.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 22 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 23 of 28
Plant areas that have exposed or moving machinery are required to include an Emergency Push button
on the LCS. The Emergency Push button should be hardwired directly to the Electrical Switchgear of the
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 24 of 28
affected drive(s) to trip the drive and a signal sent to the control system in parallel for information
purposes.
There are Balance of Plant areas that do not have process storage or an operational buffer and are vital
to the units operation, an examples is the Main Cooling Water plant. These plants are classified as
critical and their unavailability could lead to a MUT, even if unavailable for only a short period of time. It
is recommended, that for the critical Balance of Plant areas, the LCSs and LCPs are configured to have
an automatic release to Local Mode should the control room HMI fail and allow the local operators to
monitor and control the plant further with all process interlocks in place. As a further save guard, it is
recommended that the LCSs and LCPs for the critical plants are tying into the process or automation
layer of the control system and not at the application layer to minimize the risk of LCSs or LCPs
becoming unavailable due to an application server failure.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 25 of 28
4. AUTHORISATION
This document has been seen and accepted by:
Name & Surname Designation
Craig Boesack C&I Plant COE
Andre Van Den Berg C&I Plant COE
Charles Kigozi C&I Plant COE
Christoph Kohlmeyer C&I Plant COE
Eugene Motsoatsoe C&I Plant COE
Isaac Sibiya C&I Plant COE
Khaya Sobuwa C&I PEI
Mlondi Nkambule C&I Plant COE
Ndoda Mazibuko C&I Plant COE
Pravin Govender C&I Plant COE
Xolelwa Siboza C&I Plant COE
Mapula Majola C&I Plant COE
Paul Du Plessis C&I PEI
5. REVISIONS
Date Rev. Compiler Remarks
November 2018 0.1 Z Y Moola Initial draft as mandated through SCOT Charter. Medupi
specific LOA (N. Baruffa) revised to fleetwide document and
combined with BOP LOA and Plant Control Modes
documents.
January 2020 0.2 Z Y Moola Comments Update after Review Process
January 2020 1 Z Y Moola Final Document for Authorisation and Publication
6. DEVELOPMENT TEAM
The following people were involved in the development of this document:
Zubair Y Moola
Nerino Baruffa
Christoph Kohlmeyer
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following people were involved in the development of Medupi Level of Automation document which
was used as the basis for this Fleetwide Guideline:
Nerino Baruffa (PEI – C&I Engineering)
Zubair Moola (GTD – C&I Engineering)
Karlheinz Jordan (Integration Consultant – EVONIK)
Volkmar Bobon (Project Manager – EVONIK)
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 26 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 27 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Power Plant Controls and Instrumentation; Control Systems; Unique Identifier: 240-129686484
Level of Automation; System Hierarchy and Control Revision: 1
Philosophy Guideline
Page: 28 of 28
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.