Kuchipudi
Kuchipudi
Kuchipudi
The traditional Kuchipudi was performed by all males troupe. A Kuchipudi dancer
dancer in a male role would be in Agnivastra, also known as Native name కూచిపూడి నృత్యం
Bagalbandi, wear a dhoti (a single pleated piece of cloth hanging
Genre Indian classical
down from the waist).[15][16] A dancer in a female role would
dance
wear a Sari with light makeup.[16] The Kuchipudi performance
usually begins with an invocation. Then, each costumed actor is Instrument(s)
Mridangam
introduced, their role stated, and they then perform a short
preliminary dance set to music (dharavu). Next, the performance Cymbals
presents pure dance (nritta).[17] This is followed with by the Veena
expressive part of the performance (nritya), where rhythmic hand
Flute
gestures help convey the story.[17][18] Vocal and instrumental
Carnatic music in the Telugu language accompanies the Tambura
performance.[19] The typical musical instruments in Kuchipudi are Origin Kuchipudi, Krishna
mridangam, cymbals, veena, flute and the tambura.[20] The district, Andhra
popularity of Kuchipudi has grown within India and it is Pradesh
performed worldwide.[21][22]
History
Kuchipudi, like other classical dance forms in India, traces its roots
to the Sanskrit Natya Shastra, a foundational treatise on the
performing arts.[4][5] Its first complete compilation is dated to
between 200 BCE and 200 CE,[27][28] but estimates vary between
500 BCE and 500 CE.[29] The most studied version of the Natya
Shastra text consists of about 6000 verses structured into 36
chapters.[27][30] The text, states Natalia Lidova, describes the
theory of Tāṇḍava dance (Shiva), the theory of rasa, of bhāva,
expression, gestures, acting techniques, basic steps, standing
postures – all of which are part of Indian classical dances.[27][31]
Dance and performance arts, states this ancient text,[32] are a form
of expression of spiritual ideas, virtues and the essence of A Kuchipudi hasta (mudra).[1]
scriptures.[33]
According to Manohar Varadpande, the Kuchipudi dance emerged in the late 13th century, when Ganga
rulers from Kalinga were patrons of performance arts based on the 12th-century Sanskrit scholar Jayadeva,
particularly the Gita Govinda.[4] This royal sponsorship, states Varadpande, encouraged many poets and
dance-drama troupes to adopt Radha-Krishna themes into the then prevailing versions of classical
Kuchipudi.[4] These were regionally called Vaishnava Bhagavatulu.[4]
The modern version of Kuchipudi is attributed to Tirtha Narayanayati, a
17th-century Telugu sanyasin of Advaita Vedanta persuasion and
particularly his disciple, a Telugu Brahmin[15] orphan named Sidhyendra
Yogi.[40][39][41][note 1] Tirtha Narayanayati authored Sri Krishna Leela
Tarangini and introduced sequences of rhythmic dance syllables at the
end of the cantos, he wrote this work as a libretto for a dance-drama.[10]
Narayanayati lived for a while in the Tanjore district and presented the
dance-drama in the Tanjore temple.[10]
Kuchipudi enjoyed support from medieval era rulers.[9] Copper inscriptions suggest that the dance-drama
was seen by the royalty and was influential by 1502 and through the late 16th century.[47][9] The court
records of the Vijayanagara Empire – known for its patronage of the arts – indicate that drama-dance
troupes of Bhagavatas from Kuchipudi village performed at the royal court.[9] However, various historical
inscriptions often indicate that this dance form can be tracked back to the first century BCE.[48]
The region saw wars and political turmoil with Islamic invasions and the formation of Deccan Sultanates in
the 16th century.[49] With the fall of Vijayanagara Empire and the destruction of temples and Deccan cities
by the Muslim army around 1565, musicians and dance-drama artists migrated south, and Tanjore kingdom
records suggest some 500 such Kuchipudi artist families arrived from Andhra, were welcomed and granted
land by the Hindu king Achyutappa Nayak, a settlement that grew to become modern Melattur near
Tanjore (also called Thanjavur).[9] Not everyone left the old Andhra village of Kuchipudi, and those
remaining became the sole custodians of its tradition in Andhra.[9]
Kuchipudi declined and was a dying art in 17th-century Andhra,[49] but in 1678, the last Shia Muslim
Sultan of Golkonda, Abul Hasan Tana Shah, saw a Kuchipudi performance and was so pleased that he
granted the dancers lands around the Kuchipudi village, with the stipulation that they continue the dance-
drama.[43][46] The Shia Sultanate was overthrown in 1687 by the Sunni Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.[49]
In order to regulate public and private morals, as well as end un-Islamic practices,[50] Aurangzeb banned
public performances of all music and dance arts, along with ordering the confiscation and destruction of
musical instruments in Indian subcontinent under control of his Mughal Empire.[51][52]
After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, the Mughal Empire collapsed, Hindu rebellion sprouted in many
parts of India, including the Deccan region.[53] In the second half of the 18th century, during this period of
political turmoil, the colonial Europeans arrived, the Madras Presidency was formed by the East Indian
Company officials and became part of the British Empire.[54] Andhra was part of the Madras Presidency.
During the colonial era, Hindu arts and traditions such as dance-drama
were ridiculed. Christian missionaries and British officials stereotyped and
denigrated dancers, calling Indian classical dances as evidence of a
tradition of "harlots, debased erotic culture, slavery to idols and priests".
Christian missionaries launched the "anti-dance movement" in 1892, to
ban all such dance forms.[55][56][57] The anti-dance camp accused the
various classical Indian dance forms as a front for prostitution, while
revivalists questioned the constructed histories by the colonial
writers.[58][59]
After the ban, many Indians protested against the caricature and cultural A Kuchipudi dance in
discrimination, launching their efforts to preserve and reinvigorate their progress.
culture.[55][62][63] Due to these efforts from 1920s onwards, the classical
Indian dances witnessed a period of renaissance.[61] Vedantam
Lakshminarayana Sastri (1886–1956) was the influential figure who led the effort to save, reconstruct and
revive Kuchipudi performance art. Sastri worked closely with other revivalists, between 1920 and 1950,
particularly Balasaraswati and others determined to save and revive Bharatanatyam.[64][65]
Modern period
The three influential figures in Kuchipudi, during the first half of twentieth century, were Vedantam
Lakshminarayana Sastri, Vempati Venkatanarayana Sastri and Chinta Venkataramayya.[66] Sastri focused
on reviving and relaunching Kuchipudi after classical Hindu dances came under sustained ridicule and
political degradation in the British Raj, while Venkataramayya was influential in productions for public
performances and developing specialized forms of Yakshagana – another classical Indian dance, and
Kuchipudi.[66] Sastri is also remembered for encouraging and teaching Indian women to dance Kuchipudi
as solo performers and in teams, as well as working with artists of other classical dances such as the
Bharatanatyam that enabled the sharing and cross flow of ideas.[66] Vempati Venkatanarayana Sastri was
the guru of Sastri, taught him Kuchipudi, and was a key figure in helping preserve Kuchipudi.[66] The
historic All India Dance Seminar, organized by the national arts organization Sangeet Natak Akademi in
1958, thrust Kuchipudi to the national stage.[67]
Some Western dancers joined the Indians in preserving dance. The American dancer Esther Sherman, for
example, moved to India in 1930, learnt Indian classical dances, changed her name to Ragini Devi, and
joined the movement to save and revive classical Indian dances.[68] Her daughter Indrani Bajpai (Indrani
Rahman) learnt and became a celebrated Kuchipudi dancer.[69] The public performances of Kuchipudi by
Indrani Rahman and Yamini Krishnamurti outside of Andhra region, created wider enthusiasm and more
interest through new students and the expansion of Kuchipudi as a creative performance art both within
India and internationally.[67] The latter half of the twentieth century was dominated by the Kuchipudi
school of Vempati Chinna Satyam, whose efforts to further codify the modern repertoire earned him
multiple accolades, including the Padma Bhushan.
Some of the Indian movie actresses such as Hema Malini started their career as a Kuchipudi and
Bharatanatyam dancer.[70] Kuchipudi performances have now spread world-wide.[67]
The largest group performance with a total of 6,117 dancers in Vijayawada got into the Guinness World
Records[71]
Repertoire
Kuchipudi is a team performance, with roots in Hindu religious
festivals.[7] The drama-dance involves extensive stage movements
and exacting footwork, wherein the underlying drama is mimed by
expressive gestures of hand (mudras), eye and face
movements.[72][14] The expressive style is through a sign language
that follows the classical pan-Indian Sanskrit texts such as Natya
Shastra, Abhinaya Darpana and Nrityararnavali.[7][18][73] The
dance is accompanied with Carnatic music, while the recital is in
Telugu language.[7][74] Just like the Carnatic music style,
Kuchipudi shares many postures and expressive gestures with
Bharatanatyam, such as the Ardhamandali (half seating position or
a partial squat, legs bent or knees flexed out).[73] However, there
are important differences, such as Bharatanatyam as a Hindu temple
tradition trending towards geometric perfection and the spiritual,
while Kuchipudi as a Hindu festival tradition trending towards
more sensual supple and the folksy.[72][75]
Traditionally the traveling dance troupe consisted entirely of men A dancer in a costume, an
[15]
(often Brahmins ), who moved from village to village, and expressive part of a Kuchipudi
[9]
performed on a stage set next to a Hindu temple. The male artists performance.
would dress up and act out the female role in a drama performed by
these traveling troupes.[76] In modern times, Kuchipudi has
diversified, women have joined Kuchipudi dance, outnumber male artists, and are among its most
celebrated artists.[7][15][77] In some cases now, it is the Kuchipudi girl artists who dress up and act out the
role of boys.[15]
The repertoire of Kuchipudi, like all major classical Indian dance forms, follows the three categories of
performance in the ancient Hindu text Natya Shastra. These are Nritta, Nritya and Natya.[73][78]
The Nritta performance is abstract, fast and rhythmic aspect of the dance.[79][80] The viewer
is presented with pure movement in Nritta, wherein the emphasis is the beauty in motion,
form, speed, range and pattern. This part of the repertoire has no interpretative aspect, no
telling of story. It is a technical performance, and aims to engage the senses (prakriti) of the
audience.[81]
The Nritya is slower and expressive aspect of the dance that attempts to communicate
feelings, storyline particularly with spiritual themes in Hindu dance traditions.[79][80] In a
nritya, the dance-acting expands to include silent expression of words through gestures and
body motion set to musical notes. The Kuchipudi actor articulates a story (particularly of
Krishna) or a spiritual message. This part of a repertoire is more than sensory enjoyment, it
aims to engage the emotions and mind of the viewer.[81]
The Natyam is a play, typically a team performance, but can be acted out by a solo performer
where the dancer uses certain standardized body movements to indicate a new character in
the underlying story. A Natya incorporates the elements of a Nritya.[80] Kuchipudi, in its
history relied on a team of dance-actors, while in modern times Kuchipudi productions
include solo or duo performances.[15]
Sequence
A complete Kuchipudi show sequence always consists of nritta and nritya in solo or group performance,
but when the underlying text is a play, it may include a natya. The nritta or pure abstract dance parts of
Kuchipudi, states Reginald Massey, may include parts such as darus, jatis, jatiswarams, tirmanas and
tillanas.[82] The nritya or expressive performance in Kuchipudi includes padams, varnams, shabdams and
shlokas.[82]
A Kuchipudi performance traditionally is a night performance,[83] when rural families return from their
farms and are free of their daily work. It has been performed in or next to a Hindu temple, and the stage lit
by the yellow lights of castor oil burning torches.[83][84] The dance-drama begins with an invocation
(melavimpu, puvaranga). This may be an on stage prayer to Ganesha, the Hindu god of good beginnings,
or may be an invocation expressing reverence to various Hindu gods, goddesses, earth, or one's guru
(teacher).[72][84][85]
The conductor of the performance enters and plants an "Indra's banner" staff,[83] then introduces all the
actors and the characters they play, who are revealed behind a curtain, and when each actor arrives, colored
resin is thrown into the flame of one or more torches for dramatic color effects and audience's
attention.[83][84] Each actor performs a short dance called the Pravesa Daru[note 4] accompanied by a short
musical piece, as the vocalist describes his or her role.[84] The conductor is typically present throughout the
performance, on the stage, explains the play, talks and humors the audience.[83]
After the actors have been introduced, the nritta part of the Kuchipudi performance starts. The actors
present a pure dance (jatis or jatiswarams), performed rhythmically to a musical raga, and these are called
Sollakath or Patakshara.[73][86] A basic unit of dance in Kuchipudi is called a adugu (or adugulu), and
these correspond to the karana in Natya Shastra.[87] Each basic unit combines hand and foot movement
into a harmonious sthana (posture) and chari (gait), that visually appeals to the audience wherever he or
may be sitting.[87] Each dance unit, according to the ancient text, is best performed to certain recitation of
mnemonic syllables and musical beat.[87] A series of karana form a jati, formalized originally as an oral
tradition through Sanskrit mnemonics, later written, and these form the foundation of what is performed in
nritta sequence of Kuchipudi.[88]
Thereafter comes the nritya, the expressive part called abhinaya, and this is the heart of the play.[89] The
actor-dancer uses hand mudras and facial expressions inspired by the sign language in ancient Sanskrit
texts, with an exacting footwork, to communicate the underlying story to the audience.[89] A solo play or
solo part of the performance is called a Shabdam, and this may be set to a poem, a verse or a prose.[73][21]
A varnam combines dance with mime in order to draw out and express the rasa (emotional taste), and this
can be solo or group. Parts set to poetry that are love lyrics or express deeper sentiments are called a
padam, and this part constitutes expressing the emotional, the allegorical and the spiritual aspects of the
play.[90][91]
Kavutvams are a feature of the performance that is distinctive to Kuchipudi. These are performed either as
nritta or nritya, to different talas, wherein the dancer adds acrobatics to the complexity of presentation. For
example, the dancer may perform the footwork, rhythmically to music, while balancing a series of pots on
his or her head, and then add burning Diya (lamp) in both hands, as the show goes on.[92] Some artists dip
their foot on a wet ink pad, then dance rhythmically on a blank white piece of paper, thus painting it;
alternatively, the troupe places coloured rice powder on floor and on top the white piece of paper, then
dances the musical composition on it, their weight and steps causing the pigment to stick.[93] At the end of
the performance, the artist shows the audience the nature scenery or bird or flower or Ganesha or
something that results.[93] A Mayura Kavutvam dance produces a painting of a peacock, a Vinayaka
Kavutvam of Ganesha, a Simhanandi Kavutvam yields the painting of a lion, each set to a certain classical
composition and beat, for instance.[93]
Costumes
The traditional Kuchipudi was performed by all males troupe. A dancer in a male role would be in
Angavastra, also known as Bagalbandi, wear a dhoti (a single pleated piece of cloth hanging down from
the waist).[15][16] A dancer in a female role would wear a Sari with light makeup.[16]
Modern productions retain the male dress, but are more elaborate and Bharatanatyam-like for the female
roles. Women artists wear a brilliantly colourful Sari (or a body fitting dress) with a pleated fan stitched in
front to help highlight the exacting footwork.[16] The end of the wrapped Sari is held fast under a light
metallic (golden or brass) belt at waist. A Kuchipudi artist braids her hair somewhat differently than a
Bharatanatyam artist, to reflect the regional traditions, yet wearing flowers are common. Both have
symbolic elements embedded in their hair and face jewelry, such as the Vedic symbolisms for the sun and
the moon, the soul and the nature, and she sometimes sets her hairdo in the tribhuvana style which
represents the three worlds.[16] Her jewelry may include hair jewelry, ear, nose, armlets, necklaces and
often a leather anklet piece with little bells (gajjelu or ghungroo).[15] The forehead has a round red bindi or
a symmetric tillaka, while the eyes are typically ringed with black collyrium to ease the viewing of
expressions by the audience.[72]
Some special Kuchipudi plays may include unusual costumes and theatrics, such
as round bottom water pot balanced on the head, dancing with gymnastics or
stilt athletics.[84] Other plays may include wing props, a transparent head sheet,
or peacock feathered crown to identify the actor playing Krishna.[84]
Musical instruments
Styles
Kuchipudi has several regional banis (styles), which developed because of the uniqueness and creativity of
gurus (teachers).[95] This openness and flexibility has been a historic tradition in Indian dance culture, and
is traceable to early times in Kuchipudi as the Margi and Desi styles in the text Nrittaratnavali of Jaya
Senapati.[96][note 5] According to Senapati, the Desi styles referred to one that incorporated innovations to
the conservative Margi styles.[96] Senapati lists examples of each. For Margi styles, he describes Vedayata,
Veddangam, Bommalata, Perani, Chindu, Bahurupam, Pagativeshalu and others; while for Desi styles,
Senapati describes Rasaka, Charchari, Bhandika, Kollata and others.[96] Some of these styles are
discernible in Warangal sculptures of the 13th century.[101]
The dance styles are based on the standard treatises, Abhinaya Darpana and Bharatarnava of
Nandikeswara, which is sub-divided into Nattuva Mala and Natya Mala. Nattuva Mala is of two types —
the Puja dance performed on the Balipitha in the temple and the Kalika dance performed in a Kalyana
Mandapam. Natya Mala is of three kinds — ritual dance for gods, Kalika dance for intellectuals and
Bhagavatam for common place.
See also
Vilasini Natyam
Andhra Natyam
Perini Sivatandavam
Bharatanatyam
Notes
1. His name is sometimes spelled Siddhendra Yogi.[15]
2. Parijatapaharana means "The Stealing of the Parijata Flower".
3. There are three versions of the story. In the first, Lord Krishna appears before Sidhyendra
and promises moksha if he told this love epic.[40][43] In another, Sidhyendra promises
Krishna to dedicate his life to bhakti if his life was saved during a dangerous river-
crossing.[44] In the third, Sidhyendra was simply inspired by his devotion and love for God to
compose the work.[45] The Parijatapaharana tells the story of how Rukmini asked Krishna to
get her the Parijata tree from the garden of the god Indra and Satyabhama's jealousy as a
result.
4. This is called Dhruva in the ancient text Natya Shastra, which explains its purpose as 'form
an emotional connection between the actor and the audience'.[83]
5. Margi and Deshi styles are found in other classical Hindu dances as well, with Margi being
those that aim to uplift thoughts, imagination or devotional, focus on spiritual ideas, while
Deshi are festive, folksy, focus on celebration and entertainment.[97][98][99] According to
Kothari and Pasricha, the styles are reflected in the adugulu or the basic building blocks of
the dance in Kuchipudi.[100]
References
1. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 117.
2. Williams 2004, pp. 83–84, the other major classical Indian dances are: Kathak, Odissi,
Bharatanatyam, Kathakali, Manipuri, Chhau, Satriya, Kuchipudi and Mohiniyattam..
3. " 'Art has to be nurtured to sustain' " (http://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/dance/%E2%8
0%98Art-has-to-be-nurtured-to-sustain%E2%80%99/article16993784.ece). The Hindu.
Retrieved 5 April 2017.
4. Manohar Laxman Varadpande (1982). Krishna Theatre in India (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=TaF603WEv4IC). Abhinav Publications. p. 133. ISBN 978-81-7017-151-5.
5. Ragini Devi 1990, pp. 60–68.
6. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 43–46, 80 footnote 8.
7. James G. Lochtefeld (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M (https://books.go
ogle.com/books?id=5kl0DYIjUPgC&pg=PA376). The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 376–
377. ISBN 978-0-8239-3179-8.
8. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 79–81.
9. Ragini Devi 1990, pp. 67–68.
10. Krishna Chaitanya (1987), "Arts of India.", pages.74
11. Ragini Devi 1990, p. 73.
12. Banham, edited by James R. Brandon ; advisory editor, Martin (1993). The Cambridge guide
to Asian theatre (https://books.google.com/books?id=ttnH5W9qoBAC) (Pbk. ed.).
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-58822-5.
{{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)
13. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001.
14. Farley P. Richmond, Darius L. Swann & Phillip B. Zarrilli 1993, p. 173.
15. Bruno Nettl; Ruth M. Stone; James Porter; et al. (1998). The Garland Encyclopedia of World
Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinent (https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOlNv8MA
XIEC&pg=PA516). Routledge. pp. 516–518. ISBN 978-0-8240-4946-1.
16. Shovana Narayan (2011). "Kuchipudi". The Sterling Book of Indian Classical Dance (https://
books.google.com/books?id=zLOiaGDLYOAC). Sterling. pp. 50–51. ISBN 978-81-207-
9078-0.
17. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 43–45, 97–104, 117–121.
18. Cornelia Müller (2013). Body – Language – Communication (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=VPjbBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA309). De Gruyter. pp. 310–319. ISBN 978-3-11-026131-8.
19. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 147–149.
20. Farley P. Richmond, Darius L. Swann & Phillip B. Zarrilli 1993, pp. 172–173.
21. Ragini Devi 1990, pp. 73–76.
22. Gijsbert Oonk (2007). Global Indian Diasporas: Exploring Trajectories of Migration and
Theory (https://books.google.com/books?id=BkwsMTyShi8C). Amsterdam University Press.
p. 109. ISBN 978-90-5356-035-8.
23. Ragini Devi 1990, p. 67.
24. A. K. Ramanujan; Velcheru Narayana Rao; David Dean Shulman (1994). When God is a
Customer: Telugu Courtesan Songs by Kṣētrayya and Others (https://books.google.com/boo
ks?id=Uhix8nKXGnQC). University of California Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-520-08069-0.
25. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 80–81.
26. Monier Williams (1872). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and philologically
arranged (https://books.google.com/books?id=uqlRAAAAcAAJ). Oxford University Press.
p. 243.
27. Natalia Lidova 2014.
28. Tarla Mehta 1995, pp. xxiv, 19–20.
29. Wallace Dace 1963, p. 249.
30. Emmie Te Nijenhuis 1974, pp. 1–25.
31. Kapila Vatsyayan 2001.
32. Guy L. Beck (2012). Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition (https://books.google.
com/books?id=UzUMCAAAQBAJ). University of South Carolina Press. pp. 138–139.
ISBN 978-1-61117-108-2. "Quote: "A summation of the signal importance of the Natyasastra
for Hindu religion and culture has been provided by Susan Schwartz, "In short, the
Natyasastra is an exhaustive encyclopedic dissertation of the arts, with an emphasis on
performing arts as its central feature. It is also full of invocations to deities, acknowledging
the divine origins of the arts and the central role of performance arts in achieving divine
goals (...)"."
33. Coormaraswamy and Duggirala (1917). "The Mirror of Gesture" (https://archive.org/stream/c
u31924012568535#page/n5/mode/2up). Harvard University Press. p. 4.; Also see chapter
36
34. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 23–24.
35. Emmie te Nijenhuis (1970). Dattilam: A Compendium of Ancient Indian Music (https://books.
google.com/books?id=Q8MUAAAAIAAJ). Brill Archive. pp. 25, 291–293.
36. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 29.
37. Sunil Kothari (1979). Parata Nāṭṭiyam (https://books.google.com/books?id=UEs7AQAAIAA
J). Marg Publications. p. 13.
38. Mohan Khokar; Gurmeet Thukral (1985). The splendors of Indian dance (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=RUvRAAAAMAAJ). Hyperion. p. 76. ISBN 978-81-7002-002-8.
39. Reginald Massey 2004, p. 80.
40. Khokar, Mohan (1984). Traditions of Indian Classical Dance. India: Clarion Books. p. 158.
41. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 31, 45.
42. Khokar, Mohan (1984). Traditions of Indian Classical Dance. India: Clarion Books. p. 169.
43. Massey, Reginald; Massey, Jamila (1989). The Dances of India: A General Survey and
Dancers' Guide. United Kingdom: Tricolour Books. p. 27. ISBN 0-948725-04-4.
44. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 32.
45. Bhavnani, Enakshi (1965). The Dance in India: The Origin and History, Foundations, the Art
and Science of the Dance in India – Classical, Folk and Tribal. India: D. B. Taraporevala
Sons & Co. Private Ltd. p. 57.
46. Kothari, Sunil; Pasricha, Avinash (2001). Kuchipudi: Indian Classical Dance Art. India:
Abhinav Publications. p. 33. ISBN 9788170173595.
47. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 79–80.
48. Putcha, Rumya S. (December 2013). "Between History and Historiography: The Origins of
Classical Kuchipudi Dance" (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/dance-research-journ
al/article/abs/between-history-and-historiography-the-origins-of-classical-kuchipudi-dance/1
397F05407968103AC437521E6726D84). Dance Research Journal. 45 (3): 91–110.
doi:10.1017/S0149767713000260 (https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0149767713000260).
ISSN 0149-7677 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0149-7677). S2CID 191350966 (https://api.s
emanticscholar.org/CorpusID:191350966).
49. Bilkees I. Latif (2010). Forgotten (https://books.google.com/books?id=3-SCyobP0koC).
Penguin Books. pp. 132, 71–74. ISBN 978-0-14-306454-1., Quote: "(...) the last Golconda
ruler Abul Hasan, known as Tana Shah, who was credited with reviving the dying art of the
Kuchipudi dance".
50. Ahsan Jan Qaisar; Som Prakash Verma; Mohammad Habib (1996). Art and Culture:
Endeavours in Interpretation (https://books.google.com/books?id=Hic3XnRU-VgC&pg=PA
7). Abhinav Publications. p. 7. ISBN 978-81-7017-315-1.
51. Abraham Eraly (2000). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Mughals (ht
tps://books.google.com/books?id=04ellRQx4nMC). Penguin Books. pp. 408–409.
ISBN 978-0-14-100143-2.
52. Mohan Khokar (1984). Traditions of Indian classical dance (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=prjnAAAAMAAJ). Peter Owen. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-7206-0574-7.
53. John F. Richards (1995). The Mughal Empire (https://books.google.com/books?id=HHyVh29
gy4QC). Cambridge University Press. pp. 273–286, 290–291. ISBN 978-0-521-56603-2.
54. Kulke, Hermann; Dietmar Rothermund (2004). A History of India. Routledge. p. 245. ISBN 0-
415-32919-1.
55. Mary Ellen Snodgrass (2016). The Encyclopedia of World Folk Dance (https://books.google.
com/books?id=DMGpDAAAQBAJ). Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 165–168. ISBN 978-1-4422-
5749-8.
56. Nalini Ghuman (2014). Resonances of the Raj: India in the English Musical Imagination,
1897–1947 (https://books.google.com/books?id=BkVZAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA97). Oxford
University Press. pp. 97 footnote 72. ISBN 978-0-19-931489-8.
57. Margaret E. Walker (2016). India's Kathak Dance in Historical Perspective (https://books.goo
gle.com/books?id=nC83DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA94). Routledge. pp. 94–98. ISBN 978-1-317-
11737-7.
58. Amrit Srinivasan (1983). "The Hindu Temple-dancer: Prostitute or Nun?". The Cambridge
Journal of Anthropology. 8 (1): 73–99. JSTOR 23816342 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/23816
342).
59. Leslie C. Orr (2000). Donors, Devotees, and Daughters of God: Temple Women in Medieval
Tamilnadu (https://books.google.com/books?id=F___xKcP8lMC). Oxford University Press.
pp. 5, 8–17. ISBN 978-0-19-535672-4.
60. Pallabi Chakravorty; Nilanjana Gupta (2012). Dance Matters: Performing India on Local and
Global Stages (https://books.google.com/books?id=KQly7wn0C5sC&pg=PA30). Routledge.
p. 30. ISBN 978-1-136-51612-2.
61. Debra Craine; Judith Mackrell (2010). The Oxford Dictionary of Dance (https://archive.org/de
tails/oxforddictionary0000crai_a8h2). Oxford University Press. pp. 420 (https://archive.org/de
tails/oxforddictionary0000crai_a8h2/page/420). ISBN 978-0-19-956344-9.
62. Margaret E. Walker (2016). India's Kathak Dance in Historical Perspective (https://books.goo
gle.com/books?id=nC83DAAAQBAJ). Routledge. pp. 99–102. ISBN 978-1-317-11737-7.
63. Ester Gallo (2016). Migration and Religion in Europe: Comparative Perspectives on South
Asian Experiences (https://books.google.com/books?id=TswFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA32).
Routledge. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-317-09637-5.
64. Douglas M. Knight (2010). Balasaraswati: Her Art and Life (https://books.google.com/books?
id=Q3EsA2NooW4C). Wesleyan University Press. pp. 77, 138–141, 179, 289. ISBN 978-0-
8195-6906-6.
65. Ananda Lal (2004). The Oxford Companion to Indian Theatre (https://books.google.com/boo
ks?id=DftkAAAAMAAJ). Oxford University Press. pp. 180, 225, 327, 422–428. ISBN 978-0-
19-564446-3.
66. Kothari, Sunil; Pasricha, Avinash (2001). Kuchipudi: Indian Classical Dance Art. Abhinav
Publications. pp. 120, 155–161. ISBN 978-8170173595.
67. Kothari, Sunil (2001). Kuchipudi: Indian Classical Dance Art. India: Avinash Publications.
pp. 7, 39–40, 192–193. ISBN 9788170173595.
68. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage (https://bo
oks.google.com/books?id=4CfA4uDwCKwC). Wesleyan University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-
8195-6837-3.
69. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 190.
70. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 203.
71. Rao, G.V.R. Subba. "6,117 Kuchipudi dancers put A.P. in Guinness book" (http://www.thehin
du.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/6117-Kuchipudi-dancers-put-A.P.-in-Guinness-book/article1
6943005.ece). The Hindu. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20161226153418/http://ww
w.thehindu.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/6117-Kuchipudi-dancers-put-A.P.-in-Guinness-boo
k/article16943005.ece) from the original on 26 December 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
72. Beth Osnes; Sam Gill (2001). "Kuchipudi". Acting: An International Encyclopedia (https://boo
ks.google.com/books?id=WTkCI62oXjEC). ABC-CLIO. pp. 183–184. ISBN 978-0-87436-
795-9.
73. Shovana Narayan (2011). "Kuchipudi". The Sterling Book of Indian Classical Dance (https://
books.google.com/books?id=zLOiaGDLYOAC). Sterling. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-81-207-
9078-0.
74. Farley P. Richmond, Darius L. Swann & Phillip B. Zarrilli 1993, pp. 23–24, 173–174.
75. James G. Lochtefeld (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M (https://archive.o
rg/details/illustratedencyc0000loch). The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 103–104, 376–377.
ISBN 978-0-8239-3179-8.
76. Farley P. Richmond, Darius L. Swann & Phillip B. Zarrilli 1993, pp. 173–174.
77. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 20–21, 190–204.
78. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 83–84.
79. Ellen Koskoff (2008). The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: The Middle East,
South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia (https://books.google.com/books?id=73MO0eiQD_EC
&pg=PA955). Routledge. p. 955. ISBN 978-0-415-99404-0.
80. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 33–38, 83–84.
81. Janet Descutner (2010). Asian Dance (https://books.google.com/books?id=8tCYjXOtkdgC).
Infobase. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-1-4381-3078-1.
82. Reginald Massey 2004, p. 83.
83. Ragini Devi 1990, pp. 68–69.
84. James R. Brandon; Martin Banham (1997). The Cambridge Guide to Asian Theatre (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=ttnH5W9qoBAC). Cambridge University Press. pp. 96–97.
ISBN 978-0-521-58822-5.
85. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 102.
86. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 102, 120.
87. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 117–121.
88. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 120–142.
89. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 97–102.
90. Samuel L. Leiter (2007). Encyclopedia of Asian Theatre: A-N (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=JttNAAAAYAAJ). Greenwood. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-313-33530-3.
91. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 102–109.
92. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 109–112.
93. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 112–113.
94. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 153.
95. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 9.
96. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 24–25.
97. Reginald Massey 2004, pp. 32.
98. Kapila Vatsyayan (1997). The Square and the Circle of the Indian Arts (https://books.google.
com/books?id=vwLJc3pBzzUC). Abhinav Publications. pp. 41–47. ISBN 978-81-7017-362-
5.
99. Phillip B. Zarrilli (2000). Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play (h
ttps://archive.org/details/kathakalidancedr0000zarr). Routledge. p. 35 (https://archive.org/det
ails/kathakalidancedr0000zarr/page/35). ISBN 978-0-415-13109-4.
100. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 129–142.
101. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, p. 28.
102. Kothari, Sunil; Pasricha, Avinash (2001). Kuchipudi: Indian Classical Dance Art. India:
Abhinav Publications. p. 38. ISBN 978-8170173595.
103. Bhavnani, Enakshi (1965). The Dance in India: The Origin and History, Foundations, the Art
and Science of the Dance in India – Classical, Folk and Tribal. India: D. B. Taraporevala
Sons & Co. Private Ltd. p. 62.
104. Reginald Massey 2004, p. 82.
105. Sunil Kothari & Avinash Pasricha 2001, pp. 120–121.
106. Massey, Reginald (2004). India's Dances: Their History, Technique, and Repertoire (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=t6MJ8jbHqIwC&dq=kuchipudi+dance+technique&pg=PA5).
Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-434-9.
107. Basa, Murali (1 March 2021). "INHERITANCE AND GROWTH OF KUCHIPUDI DANCE" (ht
tps://www.researchgate.net/publication/349710129).
Bibliography
Ragini Devi (1990). Dance Dialects of India (https://archive.org/details/dancedialectsofi0000
ragi). Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0674-0.
Sunil Kothari; Avinash Pasricha (2001). Kuchipudi (https://books.google.com/books?id=Xa8
FamiJJKgC). Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-359-5.
Natalia Lidova (2014). Natyashastra. Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fobo%2F978019539931
8-0071).
Natalia Lidova (1994). Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=3TKarwqJJP0C). Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1234-5.
Williams, Drid (2004). "In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian
Dancing" (https://web.archive.org/web/20130625041405/http://jashm.press.illinois.edu/12.3/
12-3IntheShadow_Williams78-99.pdf) (PDF). Visual Anthropology. Routledge. 17 (1): 69–
98. doi:10.1080/08949460490274013 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F08949460490274013).
S2CID 29065670 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:29065670). Archived from the
original (http://jashm.press.illinois.edu/12.3/12-3IntheShadow_Williams78-99.pdf) (PDF) on
25 June 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
Tarla Mehta (1995). Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient India (https://books.google.com/boo
ks?id=l7naMj1UxIkC). Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1057-0.
Reginald Massey (2004). India's Dances: Their History, Technique, and Repertoire (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=t6MJ8jbHqIwC). Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-434-
9.
Emmie Te Nijenhuis (1974). Indian Music: History and Structure (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=NrgfAAAAIAAJ). BRILL Academic. ISBN 90-04-03978-3.
Kapila Vatsyayan (2001). Bharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra (https://books.google.com/books?id=zK
W1PAAACAAJ). Sahitya Akademi. ISBN 978-81-260-1220-6.
Kapila Vatsyayan (1977). Classical Indian dance in literature and the arts. Sangeet Natak
Akademi. OCLC 233639306 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/233639306)., Table of Contents
(http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/toc/z2008_2719.pdf)
Kapila Vatsyayan (1974). Indian classical dance. Sangeet Natak Akademi. OCLC 2238067
(https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/2238067).
Kapila Vatsyayan (2008). Aesthetic theories and forms in Indian tradition. Munshiram
Manoharlal. ISBN 978-8187586357. OCLC 286469807 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/2864
69807).
Kapila Vatsyayan. Dance In Indian Painting (https://books.google.com/books?id=58fUibaZd
GYC). Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-153-9.
Wallace Dace (1963). "The Concept of "Rasa" in Sanskrit Dramatic Theory". Educational
Theatre Journal. 15 (3): 249–254. doi:10.2307/3204783 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F320478
3). JSTOR 3204783 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3204783).
Farley P. Richmond; Darius L. Swann; Phillip B. Zarrilli (1993). Indian Theatre: Traditions of
Performance (https://books.google.com/books?id=OroCOEqkVg4C). Motilal Banarsidass.
ISBN 978-81-208-0981-9.
External links
Kuchipudi Academies in India (http://www.narthaki.com/kuchipudi/kuch1ai.htm), Narthaki