Pathway HHHH
Pathway HHHH
Pathway HHHH
www.engineersireland.ie
Phase 1 – Experiential Learning Route
Applications for Chartered Engineer are assessed in two phases; Phase 1 (Educational Requirements)
and Phase 2 (Initial Professional Development).
You will note from the regulations that you are required to receive approval from the Membership and
Qualifications Board (MQB) to proceed with the Phase 1 Experiential Learning Route application. You should
not prepare any of the Phase 1 Experiential Learning Route application until this approval has been granted
by the MQB. Please note you must be a member in good standing in order to apply for this assessment.
When you meet the requirements as outlined in the regulations, you can apply for this pre-approval by
submitting the following by email to membership@engineersireland.ie :
• 200 - 400 words (approx) statement for each of the seven learning criteria as described in Section
5.3.2 of the regulations. Your submission should provide specific examples of how through your
experience you have developed the learning outcomes substantially equivalent to an accredited
engineering masters degree. This can be demonstrated through a combination of qualifications,
experience, and CPD.
• Summary of your Career.
• Continuing Professional Development Record (CPD).
• €50 Assessment Fee - if your company is part of the Professional Subscription Group Scheme this fee
is waived.
The purpose of the assessment is to assess if you have developed the learning criteria required to the
substantial equivalence of an accredited engineering Masters qualification. This is a totally different
assessment to Phase 2. Phase 2 deals with the competences. Phase 1 deals with the learning achieved
through experience CPD and qualifications. Applicants must demonstrate that they meet the deficits
between their qualification and an accredited engineering Masters qualification. These criteria can be
demonstrated through a combination of qualifications/CPD (particularly technical CPD/and engineering
experience.
The assessment is to consider how you have deepened and broadened your technical ability. You should
provide specific examples of the engineering technical projects you have been involved with, highlighting
your technical involvement, rather than your managerial input.
It is essential that you carefully read the regulations and the guidance document which outlines how to
approach each criterion.
(1) You must provide specific examples and demonstrate how you meet the requirement for each learning
criterion, ensuring you provide the information required under each of the learning criterion.
(2) It is essential you highlight your personal role and responsibilities on the projects.
(3) General statements should be avoided, such as “I have developed my knowledge through my 10 years
of experience” – you need to demonstrate how you developed this knowledge with specific examples.
(4) Use examples of non-standard / complex projects to highlight the depth and breadth of your design
and technical knowledge. This will help to demonstrate that you have deepened and developed your
design and technical ability to the required level.
(5) Learning gained from any accredited or unaccredited qualifications or modules completed at a level
8/9 may help to demonstrate the criteria. Particularly if the qualification is in a
technical/engineering/scientific level 8 or 9 qualification.
(6) Your application must be written in the first person and be descriptive, avoid the use of bullet points.
The specific examples of projects you provide must highlight your personal role and responsibility
within the projects;
(7) Proof read application to ensure there are no grammatical or spelling errors.
Knowledge: This is about your technical knowledge rather than your managerial skills. This is to
demonstrate your knowledge of maths, engineering and science and how you use these to make your
decisions on projects i.e. understanding the principles and theory of engineering.
Design: What is important in Phase 1 is that you show how you acquired knowledge relevant to design that
is equivalent to that acquired in a level 9 degree. The candidate must have broadened or deepened their
knowledge of a particular area of design from their work experience and technical CPD beyond the
requirements of Level 7 or 8 qualification.
You should be able to demonstrate that you have undertaken design calculations at an appropriate level
beyond, for example, basic design of steel and reinforced concrete beams, which is covered in many Level 7
courses. Co-ordination and management of the design process is unlikely to satisfy the criterion. While
sourcing of information from documents such as Eurocodes, SUDS manuals, etc. may contribute significantly
to the design aspect, please note, it is unlikely to satisfy the research aspect of the criterion for Assessment
Route A & B.
A contractor’s engineer could be involved in the design of temporary works, for example, at a feasibility or
conceptual stage, using their knowledge of both site conditions and construction methods to propose and
evaluate the most feasible scheme. The detailed design could well be the realm of another consultant or
supplier. The conceptualisation and selection of the scheme design is still design and an important part of
design. A contractor’s engineer could be the designer of a work process used in construction using their
knowledge of materials, construction methods and plant to design the process to be used in construction.
This could involve sampling and testing of material and processing methods, for example. Other possible
areas would be materials (soils, bituminous materials, soil stabilization, concrete repair materials);
temporary works design; processes or techniques involving new technology.
Research:
Definition of Research
Level 9 research typically involves the systematic investigation to establish facts and reach conclusions.
Research is a process supported by a critical review of peer reviewed literature, scientific methods, data
collection, analysis and interpretation to meet specified objectives. Therefore, the candidate will be required
to demonstrate:
- How you defined the research question;
- How you collected the data required;
- How you analysed the data;
- Based on the data collected, on what grounds did you come to your conclusion?
This could be achieved by taking a project that you have been involved in and use the data you have access
to and explore the technical issues in detail. It may require a more in-depth analysis to be carried out than
what would have been undertaken as part of the work project.
Try to engage in project(s) that have a potential research dimension. One such example (but there are
others) would be a project that requires a significant element of site investigation. Such an investigation
seeks to gain information to address particular questions and/ or concerns. Decisions are made based on
the analysis and interrogation of measured data. Should the candidate be intimately involved with the
collection, analysis, interrogation and presentation of such data to address a particular question, this would
go some way to satisfying the research requirement, providing it demonstrates how the involvement
contributes to the deepening of technical knowledge and understanding.
Criterion 1 – Knowledge
“Demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the mathematics, engineering sciences and
technologies underpinning your branch of engineering.” For this criterion you could demonstrate:
Your knowledge and understanding of the principles, Do you know it and how to
concepts, limits and range of applicability of use it?
established mathematical and analytical
methods/tools
Your knowledge of the engineering principles Your specialist knowledge
underpinning your area of expertise
Your knowledge and understanding of engineering Engineering practices
materials and processes
Show how you are aware and remain informed of Maintaining your
developing technologies and how they might impact knowledge
on your area of expertise
• Investigated new products when proposing their adoption when implementing in a design.
• Deepened your knowledge and understanding of specialist engineering principles.
• Evaluated and examined the characteristics of a wide range of construction materials.
• Developed your ability to conduct statistical analysis including accident and incident causation.
• Knowledge of the principles underpinning your area of expertise, such as the application of maths to
partial factors in design; the geometric constraints in road design; or the science behind
water/wastewater quality.
• A broad knowledge of principles and standards of practice within your area of expertise and within
other areas of engineering.
• Researched current trends, analysis, and facts to advance and inform your existing knowledge, such as
understanding storm predictions in storm water networks but ensuring you remain informed on
current and future trends in rainfall frequencies/climate shift.
• Knowledge of best practice with regard to your area of engineering, what are the processes and
practices expected. Through this knowledge and understanding you can begin to introduce more non
routine or innovative solutions to your practice.
• Continued to develop your knowledge of engineering sciences and principles through formal training
and post graduate qualifications.
• Made a hypothesis and designed and tested using that hypothesis. Then how you evaluated your design
and proceeded or used another iteration of your hypothesis. For example, using alternate
materials/layout/geometry in your design. Show how you completed the design piece making more
informed and detailed assumptions and iteration changes required to optimise the design.
• Used and synthesised statistical analysis, research and results from previous tests and experiments to
resolve design complexities.
• Completed a critical appraisal of a range of standards, a literature review of results in other
countries/locations, implementation of local materials using new design techniques.
• Knowledge of Health and Safety Law and its application to the work environment
• Developed knowledge of safety systems and standards.
“Demonstrate your ability to identify, formulate, analyse and solve engineering problems” For this
• Justified creative solutions to complex problems through the synthesis of ideas and information from a
range of sources.
• Defined the constraints/boundary conditions to a problem on an informed basis.
• Used a hypothesis to develop a solution through an iterative process by exercising appropriate
judgement.
• Completed a feasibility report for a project.
• Appraised an engineering problem using analytical, mathematical, and scientific principles.
• Selected appropriate computer modelling methods to assist in analysis of a problem.
• Analysed and evaluated risks within the problem-solving process.
• Completed modules of study in modelling/analysis tools.
• Thought ‘outside of the box’ in solving a non-routine problem. For example, how have you modified
your solution when in construction/production.
• Developed your intuitive approach to problem solving through your knowledge and understanding of
engineering principles and their application.
• Analysed and developed a solution to a complex health and safety issue in the workplace
• Conducted accident and incident investigation using range of techniques to identify root cause and
develop future control
• Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) Planning
Criterion 3 – Design
“Demonstrate your ability to design components, systems and processes to meet specific needs” For this
• Developed your knowledge of standards of practice, such as the Eurocodes, in your design work.
• Investigated and defined a problem by identifying constraints.
• Adopted general design principles and techniques.
• Carried out risk assessments and hazard identification during your design process.
• Investigated design alternatives and iterations, such as using alternative design processes or different
materials.
• Formulated design solutions while understanding design limitations and constraints. For example,
knowing from your design what will work and what won’t, water source location, traffic management
etc.
• Ensure designs are ‘fit for purpose’.
• Implemented safety requirements into your design.
• Understood organisational quality management systems such as ISO or OHSAS systems.
• Understood project documentation such as project specifications, environmental impact statements etc.
• Completed cost/benefit analysis for your designs.
• A working knowledge of BIM (Building Information Model).
• Simplified your design to deliver while meeting cost and programme constraints.
• Used software packages and analysed/interpreted results to deliver designs.
Civil/Structural Undertook design of structures/ structural elements including:
➢ Structural steel beams, columns and trusses
➢ Reinforced concrete beams, slabs and columns
➢ Pre-stressed concrete
➢ Steel portal frames
➢ Masonry
➢ Timber (including glulam and ply web beams and racking
resistance of timber framed structures)
➢ Composite steel/timber
➢ Bridges Bracing
➢ Shear walls
Criterion 4 – Research
“Demonstrate your ability to design and conduct experiments and to apply a range of standard and specialised
research tools and techniques.” For this criterion you could demonstrate:
How you have found and understood information How you approach
relevant to a non-routine problem through research?
research/literature review?
Examples of how you designed and conducted How do you test your
experiments and analysed the results research?
How you have evaluated the impact of new Your ability to assess
developments in your area of engineering impact
Examples of how you have consulted with and How you broaden the
incorporated aspects of engineering outside of your scope of knowledge in a
area of expertise. project
How you have contributed to the progression and Your contribution to the
development of engineering knowledge body of engineering
knowledge
• Researched and evaluated literature from a range of sources in the pursuit of informed design solutions
in which a range of alternatives are investigated.
• Appraised environmental, cost and society impacts of your proposed solutions.
• Created and conducted a range of experiments to test design assumptions.
• An understanding of, and expertise in, research tools to provide evidence to prove your design
assumptions, such as literature research, testing, interviewing, comparing standards for different
materials, etc
• Used a non-standard solution to an engineering problem which was influenced by the results of
research you carried out.
• Applied solutions learned from another design that did not obviously fit with the current problem you
were solving. For example using knowledge from a roads project to solve an issue in a water/waste
water project.
• Developed and broadened your engineering knowledge through investigative learning.
• Have you analysed and implemented solutions based on your familiarity with new
insights/developments in your area of expertise. For example studying the impact of global warming on
design assumptions for flood works or storm networks.
• Reviewed and evaluated designs after implementation to identify the lessons learned.
• Prepared papers and publications for presentation to peers and to your professional body.
• Consulted with peers from other areas of expertise in your projects.
• Input into industry best practice documents.
• Researched new construction/production methods.
• Attended professional body CPD events, learning sessions, trade shows etc.
• Been mentored through a research project and can therefore demonstrate how you have evaluated your
research tools on an ongoing basis.
• Planned and specified safety measures in the design of projects to eliminate or minimise hazards during
construction and future use of a structure.
Fire • Show how you have approached research, test and assess it. Show
your contribution to engineering knowledge
• How you have found and understood information relevant to a
non-routine problem through research/literature review?
• How you have evaluated the impact of new developments in your
area of engineering.
• Examples of how you have consulted with and incorporated
aspects of engineering outside of your area of expertise.
• How you have contributed to the progression and development of
engineering knowledge
Experiential Learning Assessment Route
Criterion 5 – Ethics
“Demonstrate your understanding of the need for high ethical standards in the practice of engineering,
including the responsibilities of the engineering profession towards people and the environment.”
• Given due consideration to the impact of your work on the environment, society and the
construction/production team.
• Reviewed and analysed both the purpose and detail of legislative requirements.
• Researched, reviewed and ensured your familiarity with both current and impending legislative
requirements.
• A thorough understanding and knowledge of the Engineers Ireland Code of Ethics for professional
engineers. For example you know the expectations of abiding by the code and you understand why it is
important.
• Understanding of the role of other professional institutions.
• Assessed lessons learned from previous solutions.
• Not taken on responsibility for functions you are inadequately qualified or prepared for.
• Understanding of Health and Safety Law and the human impact of poor H&S in the workplace
“Demonstrate your ability to work effectively as an individual, in teams and in multidisciplinary settings.
Together with the capacity to undertake lifelong learning.” For this criterion you could demonstrate:
“Demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively with the engineering community and with society at
large”