9692 28723 1 PB
9692 28723 1 PB
9692 28723 1 PB
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
471
English Language & Literature International Conference p-ISSN: 2579-7549
Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2579-7263
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
472
English Language & Literature International Conference p-ISSN: 2579-7549
Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2579-7263
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
aims, attitude, concluding facts, and major idea. The third level is critical,
where pupils must study, evaluate, and judge material. The writer employs
language that can direct readers' understanding based on the data offered,
the writer's point of view, intent, and honesty. It discusses examining and
evaluating language quality using some standards. In general, the greatest
level is the creative level, which works with readers' involvement in the
material to rethink the ideas. Responding using literary techniques of
various kinds, styles, and structures is required. As a result, each level has
different learning objectives, and it is preferable for pupils to master the
lower levels before moving on to the higher ones.
Literal reading as a low level of comprehension encompasses
behaviours in the learning process that are said to be crucial as the
foundation of higher-level comprehension growth. According to Saadatnia
et al. (2017), literal understanding necessitates students extracting specific
information from a paragraph. This requires the capacity to process words
individually and recognize individual words in order to derive meaning
from a long string of words that includes propositions and sentences. Literal
reading comprehension should contain the context, facts, and sequence that
can exist in a text, according to research. The context can be defined as the
entire image formed by the correlation of facts, where facts are information
placed in a text and sequences are how the information is organized in
chronological order of occurrences. This level of understanding also
requires pupils to determine the correct and accurate meaning of words or
terminology used in a book at the word or sentence level, to gather
information from reading, and to paraphrase what they learn. This diagram
depicts the skills that students should have mastered by the end of the
literal reading course.
Literal reading, being the lowest level of understanding, is regarded
important because it needs pupils to develop skills. This highlights the need
of assisting children with literal comprehension using a variety of tactics.
Naniwarsih & Andriani (2018) reveal in their study that pupils in their third
year of junior high school have a strong degree of literal reading
comprehension. However, the questionnaire results suggest that pupils
struggle with vocabulary since they have inadequate vocabulary
knowledge. Given the importance of vocabulary acquisition in literal
reading comprehension, the study's findings cannot be justified as valid.
This present study attempts to answer the gap among the previous
researches about how literal comprehension in reading affects the higher
levels of comprehension; interpretive, critical, creative. It is important to
observe how literal comprehension plays roles in the development of
comprehension skill especially in reading skill.
473
English Language & Literature International Conference p-ISSN: 2579-7549
Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2579-7263
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
METHOD
The design used in the present study is Longitudinal case study. In a study
presented by Šamo & Mikulec (2018), the design was used to observe the
development of reading metacomprehension of EFL students. In this present
study, longitudinal cases study was employed to observe how literal reading
comprehension they get on the 1st semester affects their skill in interpretive
reading level on 2nd semester, critical reading level on 3rd semester and the creative
reading level on 4th semester.
This study involves 20 students of English Literature as the subjects.
In each semester, their achievement in each semester is recorded to be
used as the benchmark for their achievement on the next semester. The
achievement included the mastery of each aspect of reading comprehension
according to the criteria of the level.
The findings revealed that 22 students with good level of literal reading
comprehension with score between 81-85 showed good level of interpretive
reading comprehension by being able to completing assignment in each level
with types of questions that are suitable to the level of the comprehension.
When students reached the interpretive level, they had no problems
working on questions about the meaning of the text, noting numerous
relationships in the text, making a comparison, drawing a conclusion, and
generalizing information. Since they have mastered the notion of literal reading
comprehension, it includes reasoning with information such as getting the tone
of the writer, the purposes, the attitude, concluding facts, and the primary idea.
Related to the ability of critical level, the students easily learn,
evaluate, and judge information since they have no problems in
understanding main idea of a paragraph which is gained in literal reading
level.
When the students reached the creative level, they no longer have
difficulties in completing questions such as delivering opinions on a text since
they have comprehended the text thoroughly by building the ability to
understand words in literal reading level. This understanding is supported by
having strong foundation built in every level of comprehension.
The findings above support the idea of Oakhill et al. (2015, p.12) which
state that it is important to have the ability to process words before actually
works with language comprehension. Literal reading comprehension builds
students ability by starting to introduce words meaning before working
with longer texts.
CONCLUSION
474
English Language & Literature International Conference p-ISSN: 2579-7549
Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2579-7263
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
REFERENCES
Cabral, A., & Tavares, J. (2002). Practising college reading strategies. The
Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–16.
Douglas, K. (2019). The reading lab : ‘ failure ’, dynamic teaching and
reflective practice in growing the skill of reading. Higher Education
Research and Development, 38(1), 124–141.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1538202
Kazemi, A., Bagheri, M. S., & Rassaei, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment in
English classrooms : Fostering learners ’ reading comprehension and
motivation. Cogent Psychology, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912
Nanda, D. W. (2020). Poor reading comprehension issue in EFL classroom
among Indonesian secondary school students : Scrutinizing the causes
, impacts and possible solutions. Englisia: Journal of Language,
Education, and Humanities, 8(1), 12–24.
https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v8i1.6771
Naniwarsih, A., & Andriani, A. (2018). The students’ ability in literal reading
comprehension. Journal of Foreign Language and Educational Research,
1(1), 1–8.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and teaching reading
comprehension: A handbook. Routledge.
Saadatnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Ketabi, S. (2017). Levels of Reading
Comprehension Across Text Types : A Comparison of Literal and
Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in
Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5),
1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9481-3
Šamo, R., & Mikulec, A. (2018). EFL reading metacomprehension from the
developmental perspective: A longitudinal case study. Journal of
Language and Education, 4(1), 105–116.
https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-1-105-116
Sari, D. P. (2015). An analysis of students’ reading comprehension based on
the four levels comprehension skills. Journal of Linguistics and
475
English Language & Literature International Conference p-ISSN: 2579-7549
Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2579-7263
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
476