Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-Temperature

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-temperature Reheater of 600

MW Supercritical Boiler
To cite this article: Jia’an Wang and Jun He 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 721 012061
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 185.201.130.8 on 07/01/2020 at 17:16

2019 International Conference on Boilers and Heat Exchangers (ICBHE2019) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 721 (2020) 012061 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/721/1/012061
Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-temperature

Reheater of 600 MW Supercritical Boiler
Jia’an Wang, Jun He

China Huadian Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author’s e-mail: jiaan-wang@chder.com
Abstract. Failure analysis of SA-213TP347H steel tube for high-temperature reheater of

600MW supercritical boiler was studied by means of macroscopic analysis, chemical
composition, mechanical properties, microstructure, scanning electron microscopy and energy
spectrum analysis. The results show that the chemical composition, hardness and strength of
the tube samples meet the limit of ASTM A213/A213M standard. The microstructure of tube-
burst sample is austenite, there are some precipitates containing Cr and Nb element at the grain
boundaries. The test results for the spare part sample near elbow show that the hardness
exceeds the limit of SA-213TP347H steel, there are a lot of slip lines and some non-metallic
inclusions containing S in the microstructure. It is concluded that solid solution treatment
missing in its manufacturing is the main reasons for the fracture, which makes Cr precipitate
on the grain boundary and form the Cr-depleted zone, which is easy to cause intergranular
stress corrosion and lead to the tube burst.
1. Introduction
SA-213TP347H austenitic stainless steel not only has good intergranular corrosion resistance, high-
temperature oxidation resistance, creep performance, but also has good welding and thermal
processing performance, which has been widely used in the high-temperature heating surface tubes of
ultra-supercritical or supercritical large-capacity boiler [1]. However, in the production of SA-
213TP347H steel, some domestic manufacturers did not carry out solid solution heat treatment after
cold processing in strict accordance with the standard requirements, or even did not carry out solid
solution treatment at all, which caused a great impact on the service performance of TP347H steel,
especially the performance of elbow.
On June 22, 2018, the high-temperature reheater of a power plant leaked. On July 12, the leakage
of the high-temperature reheater tube happened again. After the leakage, the relevant personnel of the
Electric Power Academy rushed to the scene for the first time, and preliminarily judged that the first
explosion port was the sixth of the 40nd screen tube from the left of the furnace, and the burst tube
was the inside of the U-shaped elbow of the high-temperature reheater. The burst tube material was
SA-213TP347H, and the specification was Φ 51 mm x 4.5 mm. The burst tube sample (No. 1) and the
spare part (No. 2) were cut off on site, and the tube was analyzed by optical microscope (OM),
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), etc., so as to find out
the reason why the high-temperature reheater frequently leaked.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
2. Experiment
2.1 Macroscopic morphology analysis

The explosion position of the high-temperature reheater is located on the arc side of the elbow, and the
explosion is extended along the axial direction of the tube. It’s found that the high-temperature
reheater elbow is not well formed, and the elbow is triangular in section, forming an indentation
during the pressing process. There are excessive defects in the elbow. The surface of the spare part is
bright, and it has not been subjected to solution treatment after cold working, and it is magnetically
measured by a magnetic measuring instrument. At the same time, the ellipticity of the elbow is
measured, and the maximum ellipticity is 17%, which seriously exceed the standard requirements.
2.2 Chemical composition analysis

Table 1 show the chemical composition of sample No.1 and No.2 tubes. The results show that the
main composition of the material conforms to the chemical composition requirements of SA-
213TP347H steel in ASTM A213/A213M.
Table 1. Chemical analysis results of samples (mass fraction, %)
Chemical composition C Mn S Si Cr Ni Nb
No.1 0.07 1.5 0.004 0.5 17.81 10.88 0.778
No.2 0.08 1.5 0.002 0.5 17.81 10.25 0.919
Standard value 0.04-0.10 ≤2.00 ≤0.030 ≤1.00 17.0-19.0 9.0-13.0 0.8-1.10
2.3Mechanical performance analysis

Table 2 shows the hardness test results of the explosion position (No. 1-1), the distance from the
explosion position 400 mm (No. 1-2), and the spare part straight section (No. 2-1), the inner arc
surface on the elbow of the spare part (No. 2-2) and the outer arc surface (No. 2-3), each position is
measured 3 times. The results show the hardness is consistent with the requirements of ASTM
A213/A213M. The hardness of the explosion position is low, and the hardness of the spare part is
obviously increased. It may be due to incomplete or no solution treatment of the spare part, and other
microstructures existed in the microscopic phase.
Table 3 shows the mechanical tensile test on the fire side (No. L1) and the backfire side (No. L2) of
the burst tube, and the spare part (No. L3 and No. L4). The tensile properties meet the requirements of
the standard specification.
Table 2. The hardness results of samples (HRB)
Sample No. ① ② ③ Average value Standard value
No.1-1 58.3 63.0 62.6 61.3
No.1-2 69.0 72.5 73.0 71.5
No.2-1 83.2 80.0 81.4 81.5 ≤90
No.2-2 85.7 85.0 86.0 90.6
No.2-3 83.3 83.8 82.0 83.0
Table 3. The tensile test results of samples (MPa)
Sample Sampling Rp0.2/MPa Rm /MPa A/%
No. locations ≥205 ≥515 ≥35
L1 284 605 47
No.1
L2 279 600 53
L3 284 655 50
No.2
L4 274 655 48
2
2.4 Microstructure analysis

Figure 1 shows the microstructure of the sample on the burst tube, and Figure 2 shows the
microsturcture of the sample at the elbow of the spare part. The microstructure of the tube is austenite
and grain boundary carbide, and the grain size is 8 grade. No twins and slip lines are observed. The
microstructure at the elbow of the spare part is austenite and a small amount of carbide distributed
along the grain boundary, and the twins and the slip line can be clearly observed.
Figure 1. Microstructure of the burst tube Figure 2. Microstructure of the spare part
Figure 3. SEM of the sample No.1-1. (a) low-magnification; (b) high-magnification
Figure 4. EDS of the precipitates. (b) EDS of the precipitates on grain boundary of (a)
2.5SEM and EDS analysis

The microstructure is further analyzed by SEM. Figure 3 shows the microstructure of the No. 1-1
sample with low-magnification and high-magnification. It can be seen that the precipitates are
aggregated into a linear shape at the grain boundary. Figure 4 shows EDS of the precipitates. The
results of EDS show that the precipitates are rich in Cr and Nb, which aggregate along the grain
boundary.
3
3. Results and Discussion

The results of chemical composition analysis and mechanical property test at room temperature on the
sample of the burst tube and the spare part show that the sample conforms to the requirements of
ASTM A213/A213M on SA-213TP347H, which indicating that the chemical composition is normal.
The operation time of the boiler is short, and no oxide layer is found on the inner and outer wall of the
explosion position, and there are no signs such as bulging, bulging, etc., indicating that it is not caused
by overheating [2]. There are excessive defects in the elbow, and the maximum ellipticity is 17%,
which seriously exceeds the standard requirements. According to the requirements, the solution
treatment should be carried out after the cold working of the elbow is completed. The solution
treatment can reduce the residual stress and dislocation generated by the processing. The literature [3]
points out that the residual stress and the dislocations accelerate the precipitation of chromium in the
grain boundary, the chromium boundary is sharply depleted, and the deformation-induced martensite
potential is low, which seriously weakens the resistance of the grain boundary. As well, this high-
temperature reheater elbow has not been solution treated after processing. Therefore, the unsolvent
treatment after cold working is an important cause of high hardness on the sample of the spare part and
the presence of more slip lines [4].
Scanning electron microscopy and energy spectrum analysis show that there are precipitates of
oxides and carbide particles with Cr and Nb at the grain boundary of the burst tube. Precipitates
containing Cr are precipitated at the grain boundaries, which resulting in the formation of a chromium-
depleted region at the grain boundaries, which deteriorates the corrosion resistance of the grain
boundaries. The formation and development of chromium-depleted regions is controlled by the
diffusion of Cr [5]. The large number of dislocations and vacancies generated during the cold
processing of the elbows greatly promote the diffusion of elements. And the effect of deformation is
accelerated sensitization for 18Cr-9Ni steel with carbon content of 0.04% or more. It is controlled by
the diffusion of Cr and further accelerates the sensitization. It can be seen that the unsolvent treatment
of the elbow severely reduces the corrosion performance of the grain boundary [6].
In addition, the flue gas, coal ash contains chloride and excessive sulfide, sulfate, etc., may affect
the solubility of oxides in the vicinity of the crack tip, thereby increasing the corrosion rate [7] The
literature [8-9] shows that the main reason for the failure of austenitic stainless steel tubes is that sulfur
element promotes grain boundary stress corrosion cracking. It can be seen that inclusions such as S
can adversely affect the performance of the tube.
4. Conclusion
Based on the above analysis, one of the reasons for the frequent bursting of the high-temperature
reheater is that due to the influence of the manufacturing quality, the defects in the bending process
and the elliptic deformation exceed the standard, resulting in a decrease in the mechanical strength of
the tube. Since the high-temperature reheater tube is not solution treated, the dislocations and residual
stresses at the elbow increase, which accelerate the precipitation of the Cr element carbide at the grain
boundary, and the grain boundary is sharply depleted in Cr, resulting in a decrease in grain boundary
corrosion resistance. With the operation of the unit, the SA-213TP347H without solution treatment of
the high-temperature superheater is frequently bursting under the combined action of steam pressure,
thermal stress, residual stress and corrosive medium.
References
[1] Li, Z.L., Wang, J.A., Xiao, M.Y. (2015) Failure analysis of SA-213TP347H steel reherater
tube. Heat Treatment of Metals., 40: 191-194.
[2] Ma, Q., Liang, P., Yang, S.E., et al. (2009) Investigation of high-temperature steam
oxidation for TP347H steel. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment., 30: 172 -176.
[3] Ma, G.B., Li, X.H., Xie, A.M. (2008) Short-time cracking analysis of TP347H tubes of
high temperature heat delivery surfaces of boilers. Engineering Journal of Wuhan
University., 40: 80-84.
4
[4] Tao, J., Yao, Z.J., Xue, F. (2006) Fundamentals of Material Science. Chemical Industry
Press, BeiJing.
[5] Wang, J.A., Li, J.P., Li, J. et al. (2015) Failure analysis of tube-burst of SA-213TP347H
high-temperature reheater of 600 MW supercritical unit. Transactions of Materials &
Heat Treatment., 36:122-127.
[6] Zhang, D.K. (1982) Local Corrosion of Stainless Steel. Science Press, BeiJing.
[7] Long, H.G., Chen, H.D., Wan, K.Y. (2008) Failure analysis of high temperature super-
heater bend for boiler. Corrosion & Protection, 29: 157-159.
[8] Natesan, K., Kraus, C. (1998) Corrosion performance of structural alloys in oxygen/ sulfur/
chlorine-containing environments. In: 12th Fossil Energy Materials. Knoxville. pp. 18-
30.
[9] Natesan, K., Baxter, D.J. Oxygen-sulfhr corrosion of metals in mixed-gas atmospheres. In:
3rd Corrosion-Erosion Wear of Materials at Elevated Temperatures. Houston. pp. 67-86.

Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-Temperature

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-Temperature

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-Temperature

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-temperature Reheater of 600

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 185.201.130.8 on 07/01/2020 at 17:16

Failure Analysis of SA-213TP347H High-temperature

Jia’an Wang, Jun He

Abstract. Failure analysis of SA-213TP347H steel tube for high-temperature reheater of

2.1 Macroscopic morphology analysis

2.2 Chemical composition analysis

2.3Mechanical performance analysis

2.4 Microstructure analysis

Figure 3. SEM of the sample No.1-1. (a) low-magnification; (b) high-magnification

2.5SEM and EDS analysis

3. Results and Discussion

You might also like