Livelihood Strategy Approach To Community-Based PL
Livelihood Strategy Approach To Community-Based PL
Livelihood Strategy Approach To Community-Based PL
net/publication/247897029
CITATIONS READS
43 1,427
3 authors, including:
Bruce Mitchell
University of Waterloo
145 PUBLICATIONS 3,079 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Bruce Mitchell on 25 November 2014.
Livelihood strategy
I
A livelihood strategy is an organized set of life- N RURAL AREAS in many countries, local peo-
style choices, goals and values, and activities ple combine subsistence and income-generating
influenced by biophysical, political/legal, econo- activities in varied and, typically, shifting patterns
mic, social, cultural, and psychological compo- to meet basic needs (Kutsch, 1981; Wismer, 1996;
nents. The evolution of livelihood strategies was Leach et al, 1997; Margolius and Salafsky, 1998).
Livelihood decisions are strategic and dynamic,
examined in Molas, a coastal village in North
based on changing relationships among people, their
Sulawesi province, Indonesia, near the famous opportunities for access to, and control over, use of
coral reefs of Bunaken National Park. Molas local resources, and their capacity to make use of
was selected to assess how these strategies, espe- those opportunities for subsistence and/or income-
cially those of farmers and fishers, are affected generating purposes. This study involves a case
in the anticipation stage of tourism development. study, which uses livelihood strategy analysis as a
Study results indicate that documenting the means of developing recommendations for improved
historical evolution, and present and emerging decision making with respect to planned tourism
patterns, of livelihood strategies is an essential development in one small community in Sulawesi,
foundation for successful development and im- Indonesia (Figures 1 and 2).
plementation of community-based strategies for Our interest in livelihood strategies has emerged
environmental planning and management. in response to the shortcomings we have identified
in social impact processes regarding proposed tour-
ism development in Molas, Indonesia as a result of
Keywords: livelihood strategies; Indonesia; tourism development
lack of attention to: examination of impacts and their
effects during project anticipation, that is, during the
planning/policy development stage; and basic liveli-
Jennifer Walker is with the Delphi Group, 428 Gilmour Street, hood characteristics, processes and strategies during
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0R8, Canada. Bruce Mitchell is in the the formal process of social impact assessment in
Department of Geography, and Susan Wismer (to whom corre- Indonesia (Walker et al, 2000).
spondence should be directed) is in the Department of Environ- Our concept of a livelihood strategy approach has
ment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, been developed with reference to the growing litera-
Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada; E-mail: skwismer@fes.uwaterloo.ca. ture on ‘sustainable livelihoods’ in which attention is
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Asia
Pacific Foundation of Canada and the University Consortium on being directed toward the ways in which local peo-
the Environment (UCE).1 The authors would also like to ac- ple can seek to meet basic and ongoing needs for
knowledge the contribution of two anonymous referees, whose food and shelter, as well as for security and dignity,
comments were most helpful in improving the paper. through meaningful work, while simultaneously
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal December 2001 1461-5517/01/040297-13 US$08.00 IAIA 2001 297
Livelihood strategy in community-based planning
striving to minimize environmental degradation, ac- • biophysical (loss of access to resources, environ-
complish rehabilitation, and address concerns about mental change and constraints);
social justice. Strategies for sustainable livelihoods • political/legal (impacts of new laws, promotion of
normally strive to achieve diversity of opportunities, governmental ideals);
efficiency, and sufficiency related to food security • economic (increased perceived needs, changes in
and shelter, and also to realize social equity and opportunities);
sensitivity to environmental integrity (Li, 1991; • social (changes in interaction patterns, values or
Scoones, 1998; Li, 1999; Carney et al, 2000). well being);
The livelihood strategy approach used here is • cultural (changes in traditional practices and be-
based on the idea that changes in livelihood strategy liefs); and
are normally adaptive responses to changes in six • psychological (stress, future outlook).
key interacting components:
The main focus in this study was to examine the ex-
tent to which development or environmental pla n-
ning and management initiatives are experienced as
positive (opportunities), negative (threats) or neutral
with respect to any (or all) of the six components
identified above, depending primarily on how com-
munities perceive those initiatives. Past experiences,
the current climate in the community, and future
goals are fundamental elements influencing capacity
to identify, define and respond to opportunities and
threats from development or resource management
initiatives (Couch and Kroll-Smith, 1994; Westley,
1995; Burdge and Vanclay, 1996). Livelihood, then,
is a dynamic concept, which encompasses not only
current activities but also historical experience and
future aspirations.
We define livelihood strategy as:
level. A major criticism of development pla nning, livelihood approach, in this paper our intent is first
and its associated processes such as impact assess- to elaborate on the basic components of the ap-
ment, and of many resource management initiatives proach, and then explain how field work was con-
has been that public involvement that gives affected ducted in the village of Molas in North Sulawesi, to
groups power and a voice in decisions and recog- outline the historical context for development and
nizes the diversity within and among social groups planning decisions with significant implications for
at the local level, is typically very weak (Morse and the livelihood of the villagers, especially farmers
Berger, 1992; Biswas and Agarwala, 1992; Artini, and fishers, identify and assess the evolution of live-
1994; Smith and van der Wansem, 1995; Mitchell, lihood strategies in the context of development in i-
1997; Grenier, 1998). tiatives, and finally to consider the overall va lue of
Examining livelihood strategies places a focus on the livelihood strategy approach in environmental
the values and goals, choices, and activities which planning and management. We believe that the
matter to local people, and provides one means for lessons from the case study village have general
ensuring that local concerns are central to informa- implications, and thus deserve attention from those
tion gathering and analysis, thus contributing to bet- involved in understanding planning and develop-
ter planning and decision making (Finsterbusch, ment processes.
1995; Burdge and Vanclay, 1996). .
Documenting the historical evolution and present
and emerging patterns of livelihood strategies can Components of livelihood strategy approach
help to:
Figure 3 illustrates that historical change and the
• identify important historical changes or events, evolution of values, aspirations and livelihood
which have affected communities and various so- strategies in communities affect how people per-
cial groups within them; ceive and respond to current and anticipated changes
• reveal how a social group has responded or in the opportunities and circumstances embedded in
adapted to these changes or events; the mix of components from which they create their
• reveal the values and future orientation of livelihood strategies. A thorough understanding of
individuals and social groups, important for un- the impacts and effects of historical events provides
derstanding how they will perceive and respond to a strong foundation for anticipating how people are
development or resource management initiatives; likely to respond to future development and for cre-
• provide an indication of existing capacity to re- ating plans which effectively anticipate and account
spond adaptively to policies, plans, projects, or for a variety of frequently occurring dynamics, such
new legislative provisions that will affect access as: inequality in the distribution of benefits and costs
to and/or control over the use of local natural of development; impacts on community cohesion;
resources; changes to local and regional power structures with
• provide an essential foundation for successful consequent changes in patterns of access to and use
development and implementation of community- of local resources; disruption of family and individ-
based resource management strategies. ual ways of life; differential responses of diverse
cultural, religious or ethnic groups; and specific
The livelihood strategy approach allows us to take a gender-related impacts and effects.
focused look at how people interact with resources The literature review for this study identified the
and institutions to construct a way of life; in partic u- following key livelihood concerns associated with
lar, we consider patterns of change. A community each major component of our approach. Table 1
quality of life perspective would have allowed us to summarizes key attributes of the six components
do something similar (Wismer, 1999). In Indonesia, recognized in the literature as being significant
however, concepts of quality of life are affected by
national guidelines specifying that the result of dev-
elopment should be improvements in quality of life.
These have resulted in a relatively narrow (and con-
tested) view of what constitutes quality of life (Soer- Historical change and the evolution of
jani, 1999; Manning and van Diermen, 2000). values, aspirations and livelihood
For our purposes, the livelihood strategy approach
allowed us to: embrace key concerns consistent with strategies in communities affect how
a quality of life perspective; focus our analysis on people perceive changes in
patterns of change in the varied activities related to opportunities and circumstances
income generation, subsistence production and
community resource management, which constitute embedded in the mix of components
livelihood; and, within the local context, step outside from which they create their livelihood
of a debate that was not directly germane to our strategies
research.
Given the characteristics of a sustainable
Livelihood strategy
Dynamic nature
regarding livelihood strategies during the project indigenous patterns of resource consumption, use
anticipation stage of development planning. and management, as well as influence current and
future values, aspirations and livelihood strategies
Biophysical component (Smith, 1995; Crawford et al, 1997).
Development often changes and challenges local
The manner in which a community values the bio- control over and access to use of resources (Olive,
physical environment is influenced by local and 1997), and can undermine existing resource needs
national attitudes to, and relationships with, the bio- and uses (Li, 1991). The manner in which proposed
physical environment and natural resources, and development consumes and changes natural re-
their ability to satisfy local needs and wants (Li, sources will affect how locals appraise proposed
1991; Bourke, 1994; Freudenburg and Frickel, 1994; development and its influence on biophysical health
Forsyth, 1994; Freudenburg, 1997; Olive, 1997). and safety (Malchis and Force, 1988; Krannich and
Historical events, activities and influences can alter Albrecht, 1995; Freudenburg, 1997). Competing
the biophysical resource base and orientation and resource use needs in the host community will also
Component affected Aspects of component that can be changed during project anticipation
Biophysical Anticipated construction; anticipated lack of maintenance and decay of existing structures and facilities;
anticipated degradation or improvement of human and/or biophysical health; unknowns regarding size and extent
of development growth
Political/legal Potential changes in local or other political structures; litigation to stop, regulate or win compensation from
project; heightened political claims -making; political activities in favor of/opposed to planned development
Economic Anticipated alteration of economic system; anticipated distribution of benefits and burdens from development;
decline or increase in property values; speculation and investment; ‘goodness of fit’ between development and
community
Social Potential increase or decrease in social opportunities; anticipated maintenance or decay of social cohesion and
patterns of interaction; differential construction of opportunities and threats; investment of time, money or energy
for support or resistance of project; organizational changes; changes in social stability
Cultural Perceived potential of development to destroy or preserve culture; anticipated new values needed for altered
livelihood; perceived impacts of initial and long-term contact with new development
Psychological Changes in mental health; increases/decreases to stress, anxiety, anger (through ability to benefit/lose);
increases/decreases in perceived efficacy; speed of change and ability to cope; degree of
participation/uncertainty regarding development; pressure to conform to dominant attitude regarding the
development
help to form opinions regarding opportunities and power of the anticipated development to change so-
threats from a proposed development (Freudenburg cial well being, and the rate and scale of those
and Frickel, 1994). changes are important factors affecting social stabil-
ity and the way in which a community will respond
Political/legal component to development (Malchis and Force, 1988; Rickson
et al, 1995).
The political ideology of a country with respect to
resource use, resource orientation and national de- Cultural component
velopment priorities contributes to how a host com-
munity evaluates the opportunities and threats Where culture is strong and important to the local
associated with a development (Freudenburg and community, project proposals not culturally appro-
Frickel, 1994). National priorities can be encouraged priate or suitable will be viewed negatively. Culture
through directed funding or enforced through trans- is also important to how a society views and man-
fer of power from the local to the national level. ages natural resources. A strong culture will be less
Both of these can decrease the stability or certainty open to new or drastically different land and re-
of local legal rights to land or resources (Li, 1991; source uses, and may be quite strongly tied to locally
Peluso, 1995; Rocheleau and Ross, 1995; Olive, available resources (Morse and Berger, 1992). A
1997). Legal security and trust in the deci- community in which historical events and activities
sion-making powers responsible for the proposed have undermined culture and local patterns of re-
development project can shape how opportunities source consumption, use, need and management
and threats are perceived (Li, 1991; Krannich and may be more open to new land uses (Smith, 1995).
Albrecht, 1995; Rickson et al, 1995).
Psychological component
Economic component
Commonly identified psychological components of
In locations in which residents perceive the local livelihood strategy change include uncertainty re-
economy to be poor and in need of improvement, garding development plans and activities, and fear,
and particularly where alternative economic options anger or stress associated with decisions and activ i-
are few, local people are more likely to be favorable ties occurring during project anticipation. Psycho-
about development and to identify positive eco- logical reactions to development can be the most
nomic opportunities in proposed development pro- significant factor in determining how a community
jects (Freudenburg, 1992; Bourke, 1994; will adapt to development over the long term (Gram-
Freudenburg and Frickel, 1994; Krannich and ling and Freudenburg, 1992; Bourke, 1994; Couch
Albrecht, 1995; Forsyth, 1994). However, this link is and Kroll-Smith, 1994; Freudenburg and Frickel,
not a simple one (Freudenburg and Gramling, 1993). 1994; Krannich and Albrecht, 1995; Rickson, et al,
The historical evolution of the socio-economic sig- 1995; Burdge and Vanclay, 1996).
nificance of natural resources, peoples’ perception of
their capacity to take advantage of changed circum-
stances, and the economic circumstances that influ- Case study
ence changes in resource use and valuation
determine how community members evaluate oppor- Research approach
tunities and threats associated with a development
proposal. In some circumstances, this results in a Research applying the livelihood strategy approach
situation in which, despite apparent economic need, to a case study community was conducted from late
communities strongly resist planned development or September to early December 1997 in Molas, a
resource management initiatives (Freudenburg and coastal village in the North Sulawesi province of
Frickel, 1994; Rickson et al, 1995). Indonesia, close to the famous coral reefs of Bu-
naken National Park (Figures 1 and 2). Fieldwork in
Social component Molas was carried out in co-operation with Envi-
ronmental Studies Center (ESC) staff at Sam Ratu-
The social valuation of the environment and of de- langi University (UNSRAT) in Manado, the capital
velopment or resource management proposals is im- of North Sulawesi. ESCs provide consulting services
portant in influencing how a community identifies for Indonesia’s AMDAL (environmental impact as-
opportunities and threats from anticipated develop- sessment) process for proposed projects in their
ment (Freudenburg and Frickel, 1994; Freudenburg, province. Results from the field research were meant
1997). Social values can depend on the historical to contribute to capacity building and enhancement
development of the area, ideology, education, and in environmental planning and assessment for the
the productivity and security of natural resources ESC.
(Li, 1991; Freudenburg, 1997; Olive, 1997). Extensive plans for resort-based tourism devel-
The strength of a social group to manage social opment in Molas and surrounding villages have been
changes inherent in development, the perceived created by the provincial and national governments,
Siau Island after the eruption of Karangetan volcano shellfish and firewood for personal consumption,
in 1974. Most of dusun 3 residents are of Sangihe odd jobs assisting neighbors or the village, and mak-
ethnicity and arrived in the 1960s. As dusun 3 is ing and selling tolu (traditional hats made by
fairly close to Manado City, many city workers have women).
settled there more recently and commute to work. Families are changing their livelihood strategies
Five ethnic groups are present in Molas, each speak- to multiple job holdings, in part because of land
ing a different tribal language and having specific fragmentation. As increases in population put more
customs and traditions. and more pressure on remaining land in Molas,
Several community welfare programs exist. Fish- ownership of land has changed from the traditional
ers’ and farmers’ co-operatives assist with finances, clan- and community-based structure (called hukum
equipment and training. Andel, a small-scale, adat) to individual ownership. Under the system of
government-sponsored loan program for farmers private ownership, a family’s plot of land is equally
needing financial support to address a sickness or divided among all children, which in more recent
death in the family, to replant crops destroyed by years often does not leave anyone with a suitably
some natural phenomena, or to live off until the next sized plot of land. Many are like the villager who
harvest season, started in 1947. PKK (Family Wel- reported owning land in five different locations: two
fare Movement) is a national program, which deals plots on mainland Sulawesi and three on different
primarily with family health and welfare and pro- outlying islands.
vides family planning and parenting education and Population growth has meant that the majority of
support. landholders in Molas only own 1 to 2 hectares of
land. Residents do not consider this to be enough to
Livelihood context support a family, nor is it enough to pass on to chil-
dren as an inheritance. A representative from the
The research in Molas mainly focused on the evolu- Department of Agriculture agreed that at least 2 hec-
tion of livelihood strategy by farmers and fishers. tares are needed to support a family through agricul-
Farming and fishing are the two original occupations ture without engaging in additional work. In
in the village. Decisions with regard to land and re- addition, the majority of children in Molas are not
sources by farmers and fishers have shaped many of interested in traditional agriculture. As a result, par-
the changes in the village. Almost all residents have ents have considered selling their land and investing
been involved in farming or fishing at some time, in their children’s education, Placing a high priority
either for personal consumption or for profit. Local on investment in education is a common trend
natural resources associated with the land or the sea throughout other parts of Indonesia as well, but par-
are still central to the livelihood of about 60% of the ticularly prominent in the Minahasa region (Clauss,
population. Farmers and fishers are also being the 1982; McKean, 1982; Volkman, 1983; Bucholt and
most dramatically affected of all villagers by exist- Mai, 1994; Sondakh, 1994).
ing and proposed tourism development. In many ways, the pull of modernization is usher-
Although farming and fishing continue to be of ing in a transitional generation, which is moving
great importance to the village, the number of people away from land-based occupations and towards
who report this as their primary activity is decreas- wage-based ones. For the majority of villages such
ing. Thirty-five per cent (n=247) of employed vil- as Molas, land-owning parents feel that their chil-
lagers are officially identified as farmers. An dren are uninterested in adopting the backbreaking,
additional 22% of the employed population (n=154) ‘dirty’ occupation of a traditional farmer. The Cen-
is classed as working on someone else’s land, either tral Government has also placed a strong emphasis
employed by, or borrowing land from, other farmers. on education and has designed a financial support
Only 15 families (2%) engage in fishing as their program (GNOTA) to assist families that normally
primary source of income. By comparison, 20% could not finance their children’s primary school
(n=142) are identified as public servants or private education.
company employees and 15% are classified as con- Access to education became easier for village
struction workers. These figures do not take into residents in 1993 when a junior high school was
account non-income-generating subsistence activi- built in the neighboring village of Tuminting and
ties, which remain important, especially for women transportation improvements opened up the opportu-
(Profil Desa/Kelurahan Molas, 1996). nity for access to higher-level education in Manado.
In terms of secondary work, construction was Before, children had to walk into Manado (a dis-
most commonly reported, either in the city, for vil- tance of 10 km) for education beyond the elementary
lage infrastructure, or around the homes of other level. Investing in children’s education was consid-
villagers. Some reported working on others’ fields ered a priority by all parents interviewed, and well-
during coconut harvests. Other part-time or seasonal off and poor families alike worried about financing
productive activities included raising chickens or their children’s education to an acceptable level. For
pigs for personal consumption or sale, renting out many, selling their land provided an opportunity to
cows and carts during harvest seasons, opening acquire the finances to do so.
small stores attached to the home, collecting This emphasis on schooling is creating a more
highly educated generation, which is not tied to of individuals in the village, leaving each person
farming traditions. One parent jokingly said of her with the opportunity to decide how to respond. Other
children’s disinterest in working the land: “I do not studies have found that, even without the anticipa-
have traditional children”. Weber (1994) also indi- tion of tourism development, ‘modernization’ forces
cated that generational and family divisions can be are leading many people in rural villages of Indone-
created through education, as older and younger sia to move toward income-based rather than subsis-
generations become spatially and cognitively tence-oriented activities, when they can find such
segregated. work (see for example, Robinson, 1998).
Tribal elders in Molas feel the competition be- The presence of multiple interacting forces pre-
tween modern and traditional ways. They want to sents a dilemma, since it is not possible to isolate
teach the younger generation about their culture, clearly the effect of any one factor (in this case, an-
traditions, how their ancestors lived, and particularly ticipated tourism development) relative to the other
about ethnic unity and ‘brotherhood’. They also drivers (education, modernization), which are also
want to teach traditional farming methods and the influencing livelihood decisions. Therefore, in the
uses of traditional plants for medicinal purposes. following sections, the emphasis is on identifying
However, increasingly le ss land and fewer re- patterns of attitudes, decisions and behavior in order
sources are available for them to teach with. In the to infer the relative importance of anticipated tour-
schools, modern subjects and practices, including ism development for decisions about livelihood.
those for agriculture, are replacing traditional ones
(such as how to make traditional farming equip- Changing livelihood strategies in Molas
ment), and children want to learn modern ways. Par-
ents who still work the land also feel that they are Table 2 provides some of the key elements of the
losing ground, as it is increasingly difficult to get changing livelihood strategies documented during
children to help them on their land. the fieldwork. The main changes to components and
In the past, children and young people (under the impacts relevant to live lihood strategies of proposed
age of 16) played important economic roles in the tourism development in Molas are summarized in
family. They sold hats (tolu) made by their mothers Table 3.
to other villagers, climbed coconut trees to collect Village leaders in Molas are aware that the human
the fruit and made coconut oil for cooking, worked environment has already undergone significant
alongside parents in the fields, or did other small change since the village was targeted for tourism.
jobs for the family. Respondents, who noted the de- They saw benefit in this study, and also in docu-
cline in young people’s participation in the eco- menting the changes that were taking place in the
nomic activities of their parents, have labeled this village, in order to alert other villages about the op-
new generation as lazy, saying that today’s children portunities and consequences involved in this type of
did not want to work hard. Indeed, very few young development.
children were observed to be engaged in economi- Leaders in the neighboring village of Meras, who
cally productive activities. also were interviewed during this study, had just
Most people commented that one of the major started discussing the impacts from anticipated tour-
problems in the village was the difficulty young ism development and how they should address them.
people were having in finding employment. Unem- As Meras is also part of the Kotamadya Manado, the
ployment for young people is also a problem in In- provincial government has placed it on the same
donesia as a whole (Editorial Staff for Travel and
Tourism Intelligence, 1996). Village leaders stated Table 2. Key elements of new livelihood strategies of Molas
that it was a lack of initiative and ability to look for villagers
jobs, but others suggested that too many people
were seeking a limited number of employment
Actors Activities or actions
opportunities, and that this would continue to cause
unemployment to be a problem for at least another National and - Designation and promotion of location as
decade (Sondakh, 1994). provincial a tourist destination
With the increased emphasis on education as a governments - Incorporation of Kecamatan Molas into
Kotamadya Manado, infrastructure
means of avoiding a life of manual labor, the development
younger generation’s general disdain towards farm - Preparation of Bunaken National Park
work, and the decreasing amount of available farm- management plan
- Designation of protected forest and
ing work, unemployed young people, mainly young regulations for its use
men, have begun to ‘hang out’ together in the vil-
Local government - Assisted land speculators and developers
lage, and to smoke and drink. to find residents willing to sell their land
Diverse forces influence livelihood decisions in
Land speculators - Actively purchasing land
Molas village. Some are external to the village, and and developers - Coercing land-holders to sell their land
even external to Sulawesi, such as decisions by the
Land brokers - Pairing land-holders with speculators
Central Government based in Jakarta. Others, such - Coercing land-holders to sell their land
as ‘modernization’, are, at least in part, in the hands
Biophysical - Altered access to resources Difficulty accessing resources dependent on, altered livelihood patterns
- Anticipated change to land cover and roles, some fear of environmental decline or loss of livelihood through
tourism
Political/legal - Transfer of decision-making power Enforced new land uses and economic activities, no decision-making
- Promotion of a favorable attitude power, decreased legal rights to the land, pushed to view tourism
toward tourism positively
Economic - Land speculation Provided cash to finance needs/wants, new livelihoods, education, ability
- Altered economic orientation of the to borrow land temporarily, occupational change, potential threat to other
village occupations (fishing), new jobs on speculators/developers’ land, happy for
new economic orientation but anticipate limited and unequal distribution of
economic benefits, particularly to unskilled or older residents
Social - Incorporation into the Kotamadya Urban mindset, altered social values, norms, aspirations, livelihood
Manado strategies, socio-economic differences, social unrest, theft, changed family
- Alterations to social cohesion, dynamics, anticipate increased social decline through contact with tourists
patterns of interaction, and stability
- Anticipated social decline with
tourism
Cultural - Incorporation into the Kotamadya Modern values replacing traditional ones, adat less important, loss of
Manado traditional knowledge and skills in young, anticipate increased cultural
- Altered cultural environment decline through tourism development
Psychological - Pressures to conform to the Convinced to view tourism positively, or at least not to oppose it,
dominant attitude towards tourism uncertainty and fear concerning ability to benefit economically from tourism
- Fear, anxiety and uncertainty jobs has discounted tourism from livelihood strategies
type of development path as Molas. Meras leaders from tourism, seem to be the most signif icant factors
reported that they want to take measures to slow or causing other residents to discount tourism as a fea-
halt the changes that have begun to take place. They sible long-term economic opportunity.
are hoping to use the community- and clan-based The evolution of livelihood strategies in Molas is
land-use traditions of hukum adat, which are still occurring in response to changes in valued compo-
relatively strong in their community, to forestall or nents such as: altered orientation toward, and stabil-
reverse economic changes in Meras, which are simi- ity and productivity of, the biophysical environment;
lar to those taking place in Molas, to avoid negative decreased economic security and increased multiple
changes in all the other components. job holdings; transfers of political power and promo-
For many parents and young people, moderniza- tion of ideology; decline of cultural strength and
tion ideals changed their relationship and aspirations significance; increased emphasis on education and
towards the traditional economic orientation and social change in the younger generation; and, the
biophysical land uses of the village, causing them to adoption of values, goals and aspirations based on
view favorably speculation activities, and the modernization.
changes that they would bring. New values, or a per- For farmers, these changes have generated new
ceived need for change, coupled with the limitations livelihood strategies based mainly on off-farm work,
imposed by political regulations and plans, appear to which are aimed at establishing more economic sta-
have prepared some villagers, especially younger bility, decreasing manual- or agriculture-based labor,
men, to view tourism favorably. Psychological im- permitting parents to invest in children’s education,
pacts, most notably the fear that many villagers will and providing opportunities for women to become
be unable to benefit economically in the long term secondary wage earners. Livelihood strategies for
fishers were also focusing on achieving more eco-
nomic opportunity and stability, but fishers are
seeking to do this through adoption of modern
For many parents and young people, methods of fishing, rather than adding new types of
modernization ideals changed their livelihood activities as farmers have done. Neverthe-
less, they too are seeking to invest in their children’s
relationship and aspirations towards education to enable them to have more livelihood
the traditional economic orientation options in the future.
and biophysical land uses, causing The form of tourism development being intro-
duced to Molas requires large amounts of land to be
them to view speculation activities purchased and converted from agricultural use. Land
favorably and natural resources remain central to the liveli-
hood for 60% of the population whose main occupa-
tion depends on them. Much of the remaining 40%
In addition, the younger generation is increasingly was gradual, allowing for experimentation and trial-
unfavorable toward pursuing agriculture as a liveli- and-error learning as people adapted to changing
hood, causing the older generation to discount conditions. If the proposed changes come as quickly
further its role in livelihood strategies for the future. as planners suggest, the requirements in terms of
This perspective, however should be tempered by new learning and creative response will be more
the observation that those who stand to lose the most challenging, not only because of a lack of connec-
in terms of livelihood security through the sale of tion to historically traditional pursuits, but also be-
land also have the least chance of securing employ- cause of accelerated time frames.
ment through the new economic orientation of the The research strongly supports the idea that host
village. communities should be involved in planning and
In general, it is important not to assume homoge- decision making for projects, both to enhance the
neity of response or of benefits and costs for all local potential for success of the projects and to provide
people with respect to planned tourism development, maximum opportunity for local people to anticipate,
even within one small village. Different groups adapt and realize whatever potential there might be
within Molas village (based on livelihood orienta- to develop altered or new livelihood strategies
tion, age bracket, social status, degree of access to and/or to find ways to maintain existing strategies.
various resources, degree of innovation and entre- However, environmental assessment and public con-
preneurship and so on) are responding to new envi- sultation processes associated with land-use devel-
ronmental planning and management initiatives in opment in developing countries typically do not
different ways. begin until plans have been confirmed and construc-
Their varied responses provide guidance regard- tion is imminent.
ing types of intervention measures which could Livelihood strategy analysis offers one tool for
minimize negative social and environmental impacts tracking local responses to planned development
and enhance adaptation to the proposed changes for during the earliest stages, for involving local people
different groups within the village. In particular, in in discussion about the development, and for provid-
our research, a split in impact between the older and ing useful input into the planning process. In this
younger generations is strongly evident. Changes to study, the livelihood strategy approach enabled the
the social and cultural components were viewed as identification of how the biophysical, political/legal,
negative by the older generation, but positive by the economic, social, cultural and psychological compo-
younger generation which is less interested in tradi- nents of livelihood are changing during project an-
tional values and less inclined toward traditional ticipation and how these changes are affecting the
livelihood strategies. perceived quality of life of local residents.
Our research suggests that, despite a recent (1999) Further research and application of the livelihood
Indonesia n national commitment to decentralization strategy approach at other stages in the development
of decision-making, village residents may become process, and in other locations, is needed to test the
increasingly disempowered in decisions regarding wider usefulness of the approach. In this study, a
land use and economic activities in the village. This longer research period would have allowed more
potential disempowerment, coupled with changes in: emphasis on factors that may contribute more indi-
access to land and resources; the relative security of rectly, rather than directly, to livelihood strategies,
‘ownership’ of land and influence over decisions such as the role of voluntary organizations, which
regarding its use; the economic orientation of house- are widely understood to be central to the strength of
holds and the village; and the associated effects on community life, but which did not figure strongly in
social and cultural norms, cohesion, interaction and this study’s data sets for Molas.
stability will all affect capacity to adapt at the indi- Our experience with this case study and with con-
vidual level. tinued research making use of the livelihood strategy
Data generated through the interviews suggest approach suggests that the importance of livelihood
that, in the past, evolution of livelihood strategies should not be underestimated. Tools for analyzing
the historical, current and potential livelihood strat-
egies of local people are essential for achieving an
understanding of how to carry out effective devel-
Host communities should be involved opment planning and environmental management.
in planning and decision making, to
enhance opportunity for success and
allow local people to anticipate, adapt Note
and realize whatever potential there
1. UCE is a collaborative project involving the Faculties of Envi-
might be to develop altered or new ronmental Studies at the University of Waterloo and York
livelihood strategies University in Canada, and seven Environmental Study Centers
in Sulawesi and Java, Indonesia with the aim to enhance envi-
ronmental management in general, and environmental impact
assessment (AMDAL in Indonesian), ecosystem management,
and gender and development. UCE is the education and train- Kutsch, T (1981), “Modernization, everyday life and social roles:
ing component of the Collaborative Environmental Project in benefits, costs and lives in ‘developed’ societies”, in M O Attir,
Indonesia (CEPI), funded by the Canadian International B Holzner and Z Suda (editors), Directions of Change: Mod-
Development Agency. ernization Theory, Research, and Realities (Westview Press,
Boulder CO) pages 153–169.
Leach, M, R Meams and I Scoones (1997), “Challenges to com-
munity-based sustainable development”, IDS Bulletin, 28(4),
References pages 4–14.
Li, T (editor) (1999), Transforming the Indonesian Uplands: Mar-
Artini, T (1994), Environmental Impact Assessment of the Kedun- ginality, Power and Production (Harwood Academia, Amster-
gombo Dam Project in Indonesia: Public Involvement and dam).
Social Aspects , unpublished MA thesis, University of Waterloo, Li, T, in cooperation with S Mamar (1991), Culture, Ecology and
Department of Geography, Waterloo, Ontario. Livelihood in the Tinombo Region of Central Sulawesi, EMDI
Beebe, J (1995), “Basic concepts and techniques of rapid Environmental Reports no 6 (Atlantic Nova Print, Halifax).
appraisal”, Human Organization, 54(1), pages 42–51. Mai, U (1994), “The local association as a modern institution of
Biswas, A K, and SB Agarwala (1992), Environmental Impact socialization”, in Buchholt and Mai (1994), pages 68–90.
Assessment for Developing Countries (Butterworth– Malchis, G E, and J E Force (1988), “Community stability and
Heinemann, Oxford). timber-dependent communities”, Rural Sociology, 53(2), pages
Bourke, L (1994) “Economic attitudes and responses to siting 220–234.
hazardous waste facilities in rural Utah”, Rural Sociology, Manning, C, and P van Diermen (editors) (2000), Indonesia in
59(3), pages 485–496. Transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis (Zed
Buchholt, H, and U Mai (editors) (1994), Continuity, Change and Books, London).
Aspirations. Social and Cultural Life in Minahasa, Indonesia Margoluis, R, and N Salafsky (1998), Measures of Success
(Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore). (Island Press, Washington DC).
Burdge, R J and F Vanclay (1996), “Social impact assessment: a McCracken, J A, J N Pretty and G R Conway (1988), Introduction
contribution to the state of the art s eries”, Impact Assessment, to Rapid Rural Appraisal for Agricultural Development (Inter-
14(1), March, pages 59–86. national Institute for Environment and Development, London).
Carney, D, M Drinkwater, T Rusinow, K. Neefjes, S Wanmali and McKean, P F (1982), “Tourists and Balinese”, Cultural Survival
N Singh (2000), Livelihood Approaches Compared, available Quarterly, 6(3), pages 32–34.
at www.undp.org/sl/documents/, draft prepared November Mitchell, B (1997), Resource and Environmental Management
1999, revised February 2000. (Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, Essex).
Chambers, R (1994a), “The origins and practice of participatory Mitlin, D, and J Thompson (editors) (1994), “Special issue on
rural appraisal”, World Development, 22(7), pages 953–969. participatory tools and methods in urban areas”, RRA Notes ,
Chambers, R (1994b), “Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analy- 21, International Institute for Environment and Development,
sis of experienc e”, World Development, 22(9), pages 1253– London.
1268. Morse, B, and T Berger (1992), Sardar Sarovar. The Report of the
Clauss, W (1982), Economic and Social Change Among the Si- Independent Review (Resource Futures Inc (RFI), Ottawa).
malungun Batak of North Sumatra (Brietenbach, Saarbrhcken, Neuman, W L (1997), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and
Fort Lauderdale). Quantitative Approaches (Allyn & Bacon, New York, third edi-
Couch, S R and S Kroll-Smith (1994), “Environmental controver- tion).
sies, interactional resources, and rural communities: siting Olive, C (1997), Land Use Change and Sustainable Development
versus exposure disputes”, Rural Sociology, 59(1), pages in Segara Anakan, Java, Indonesia: Interactions Among
25–44. Society, Environment and Development, unpublished PhD dis-
Crawford, B R, C Rotinsulu, JD Kusen, E Mantjoro and A J sertation, University of Waterloo, Department of Geography,
Siahainenia (1997), “A community based coastal resource Waterloo, Ontario.
management approach: results of initial baseline surveys in Peluso, N L (1995), “Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping
the villages of Bentenan and Tumback, North Sulawesi, Indo- forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia”, Antipode, 27(4),
nesia”, paper presented at the International Seminar on Mari- pages 383–406.
time Communities in a Changing World, Manado, Indonesia, Profil Desa/Kelurahan Molas (1996), “Daftar Isian”, Departamen
23–26 September. Dalam Negeri Republic Indonesia, 13 February.
Editorial Staff for Travel and Tourism Intelligence (1996), Interna- Rickson, R E, M Lane, M Lynch-Blosse and J S Western (1995),
tional Tourism Reports , (2), pages 21–40. “Community, environment, and development: social impact
Finsterbusch, K (1995) “In praise of SIA? A personal review of the assessment in resource-dependent communities”, Impact As-
field of social impact assessment feasibility, justification, his- sessment, 13(4), pages 347–369.
tory, methods, issues”, Impact Assessment, 13(3) pages 229– Robinson, K (1998), “Love and sex in an Indonesian mining
252. town”, in K Sen and M Stivens (editors), Gender and Power in
Forsyth, C J (1994) “Society: the interaction of people, environ- Affluent Asia (Routledge, London) pages 63–86.
ment and technology”, Sociological Spectrum, 16(4), pages Rocheleau, D, and L Ross (1995), “Trees as tools, trees as text:
339–345. struggles over resources in Zambrana–Ahacuey, Dominican
Freudenburg, W R (1992) “Addictive economies: extractive indus- Republic”, Antipode, 27(4), pages 407–428.
tries and vulnerable localities in a changing world”, Rural Scoones, I (1998), Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework
Sociology, 57(3), pages 305–332. for Analysis (Institute of Development Studies, University of
Freudenburg, W R (1997), “MSSA plenary address: the crude and Sussex, UK).
the refined: Sociology, obscurity, language and oil”, Sociologi- Scoones, I, and J McCracken (editors) (1989), Participatory Rapid
cal Spectrum, 17(1), pages 1–28. Rural Appraisal in Wollo: Peasant Association Planning for
Freudenburg, W R, and S Frickel (1994), “Digging deeper: Natural Resource Management (International Institute for Envi-
mining-dependent regions in historical perspective”, Rural ronment and Development, London).
Sociology, 59(2), pages 226–288. Smith, D B, and M van der Wansem (1995), Strengthening EIA
Freudenburg, W R, and R Gramling (1993), “Socioenvironmental Capacity in Asia: Environmental Impact Assessment in the
factors and development policy: understanding opposition and Philippines, Indonesia and Sri Lanka (World Resources Insti-
support for offshore oil”, Sociological Forum, 8(3), pages 341– tute, Washington DC).
364. Smith, R C (1995), “GIS and long range ec onomic planning for
Gramling, R, and W R Freudenburg (1992), “Opportunity -threat, indigenous territories”, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18(4),
development, and adaptation: toward a comprehensive pages 43–48.
framework for social impact assessment”, Rural Sociology, Soerjani, M (1999), “ Environmental education in support of
57(2), pages 216–234. sustainable development: the case of Indonesia”, in Y Itakura,
Grenier, L (1998), Working with Indigenous Knowledge (IDRC, J S Eades, F D’Iltri, M Kawashima, S Endoh and H Kitamuru
Ottawa). (editors), Intergrated Environmental Management: Develop-
Krannich, R S, and S L Albrecht (1995), “Opportunity/threat ment, Information and Education in the Asian–Pacific Region
responses to nuclear waste disposal facilities”, Rural Sociol- (Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washing-
ogy, 60(3), pages 435–453. ton DC) pages 189–197.
Sondakh, L (1994), “Employment patterns and the role of off-farm Mai (1994), pages 91–105.
labor in rural North Sulawesi”, in Buchholt and Mai (1994), Westley, F (1995), “Governing design: the management of social
pages 167–175. systems and ecosystems management”, in L Gunderson, C S
Volkman, T (1983), “A view from the mountains”, Cultural Survival Holling and S Light (editors), Barriers and Bridges (Columbia
Quarterly, 7(4), page 21. University Press, New York) pages 391–427.
Walker, J L, B Mitchell and S Wismer (2000), “Impacts during Wismer, S (1996), “The nasty game”, Alternatives , 22(4), pages
project anticipation in Molas, Indonesia: implications for social 10–17.
impact assessment”, Environmental Impact Assessment Re- Wismer, S (1999), “From the ground up: quality of life indicators
view, 20, pages 513–535. and sustainable community development”, Feminist Econom-
Weber, H (1994a), “The division of generations”, in Buchholt and ics, 5(2 ), pages 109–114.