Group C - DEI Notes and Discussion Questions - 2
Group C - DEI Notes and Discussion Questions - 2
Group C - DEI Notes and Discussion Questions - 2
Employees are the ones who value diversity, according to Glassdoor, 57% of employees think
their companies should be more diverse.
According to McKinsey, companies that are in the top quartile for ethnic diversity are 35% more
likely to have better financial returns than industry medians.
Historically, diversity efforts have focused narrowly on the core dimensions within the inner
circles of the diversity wheel, neglecting others. However, according to "The Future of Jobs
Report" by the World Economic Forum, numerous studies have consistently shown that diversity
in the workforce brings significant business advantages. There is a pressing need for
fundamental changes in how diversity issues are perceived and addressed to overcome
longstanding barriers. It's only a matter of time before a genuinely diverse human capital,
encompassing all three circles, becomes integral to a company's financial metrics. While it may
seem like a distant goal, demonstrating the financial benefits of diversity will greatly advance
these efforts, bridging the gap between aspiration and reality.
Article 3: Why corporate diversity programmes fail and how small tweaks can have a big
impact
- Example: incident at Starbucks in 2018 to show the limitations of diversity training
programs.
- Highlights the need for systemic changes to address structural racism in corporations.
Bias patterns:
- Describes various patterns of bias, including "prove it again," "the tightrope," and "the
maternal wall."
- Provides examples and research findings to illustrate how these biases
disproportionately affect marginalized groups.
- The article highlights various forms of bias that affect workplaces, including having to
prove oneself constantly, limited acceptable behaviours, and challenges faced by women
with children.
- Focus on interrupting bias: While anti-bias training often fails, managers can actively
interrupt bias. Individual leaders can play a significant role in interrupting bias within their
teams. Understanding and addressing biases in everyday interactions is key.
- Hiring practices: To help mitigate the bias, the article suggests creating a diverse hiring
pool by using objective criteria, avoiding referral hiring, and structuring interviews with
skills-based questions.
- Performance reviews and promotions: Clear evaluation criteria with a focus on
performance and skills are crucial. Encouraging self-promotion and having a transparent
process for promotions can help reduce bias.
Article 5: 10 steps businesses can take to improve Diversity and Inclusion in their
workplace
We often quickly form opinions about others based on learned habits and prejudices that are
deeply ingrained in our culture. These biases are so deeply rooted that we absorb them
unconsciously, much like breathing air.
The text discusses various biases that exist in society, such as confirmation bias, similarity bias,
and beauty bias. It illustrates how these biases influence our perceptions and interactions,
shaping our social norms and cultural expectations. Furthermore, the text delves into the
concept of white privilege, highlighting its pervasive influence in American society and providing
examples of its manifestations.
Moreover, the text calls for action to address diversity and inclusion in the workplace,
recognizing the significant impact of workplace culture on individuals' experiences and
opportunities. It seeks insights from Black and minority leaders in various fields to contribute to
the discussion on diversity and inclusion initiatives.
In summary, the text encourages readers to confront biases, actively engage in anti-racism
efforts, and promote diversity and inclusion in both societal and workplace contexts.
The text outlines ten actionable steps that businesses can take to enhance diversity and
inclusion within their workforce:
Questions
Q1. Is the emphasis on diversity and inclusion in companies driven by a genuine commitment to
social justice, or are there underlying motives tied to improving financial performance and public
image?
Q2. In what ways do the bias patterns perpetuate inequality and hinder progress toward
achieving genuine diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace?
Q3. What role do individual leaders play in interrupting bias within their teams?
Q4. Is the concept of "color-blindness" in the workplace truly effective in promoting equity and
inclusion, or does it perpetuate a system of ignoring systemic inequalities?
Q5. Are employee resource groups (ERGs) effective in fostering inclusivity, or do they
inadvertently lead to segregation and reinforce divisions within the workforce?