Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor:

Speed-torque curves for Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor are


given in Fig. 6.50. While maximum torque is independent of rotor
resistance, speed at which the maximum torque is produced changes with
rotor resistance. For the same torque, speed falls with an increase in Rotor
Resistance Control of Induction Motor.

Advantage of Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor is that motor


torque capability remains unaltered even at low speeds. Only other
method which has this advantage is variable frequency control. However,
cost of Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor is very low compared
to variable frequency control. Because of low cost and high torque
capability at low speeds, rotor resistance control is employed in cranes,
Ward Leonard Ilgener Drives, and other intermittent load applications.

Major disadvantage is low efficiency due to additional losses in resistor


connected in the rotor circuit. As the losses mainly take place in the
external resistor they do not-heat the motor.

Conventional Methods:

A number of methods are used for obtaining variable resistance. In drum


controllers, resistance is varied by using rotary switches and a resistance
divided in few steps. Variable resistance can also be obtained by using
contactors and resistors in series. High power applications use a slip-
regulator, which consists of three electrodes submerged in an electrolyte,
consisting of saline water. Resistance is varied by changing the distance
between electrodes and earth electrode. When the power is high,
electrodes are driven by a small motor. Advantage of this method is that
resistance can be changed steplessly.

Static Rotor Resistance Control:

Rotor resistance can also be varied steplessly using circuit of Fig. 6.51. The
ac output voltage of rotor is rectified by a diode bridge and fed to a
parallel combination of a fixed resistance R and a semiconductor switch
realized by a transistor Tr (Fig. 6.51).

Effective value of resistance across terminals A and B, RAB, is varied by


varying duty ratio of transistor Tr, which in turn varies rotor circuit
resistance. Inductance Ld is added to reduce ripple and discontinuity in
the dc link current Id. Rotor current waveform will be as shown. in Fig.
6.5104 when the ripple is neglected. Thus rms rotor current will be

Resistance between terminals A and B will be zero when transistor is on


and it will be R when it is off. Therefore, average value of resistance
between the terminals is given by
where δ is the duty ratio of the transistor and is given by Eq. (5.112).

Power consumed by RAB is

From Eqs. (6.88) and (6.89), power consumed by RAB per phase is

Equation (6.90) suggests that rotor circuit resistance per phase is


increased by 0.5R(1 – δ). Thus, total rotor circuit resistance per phase will
now be

RrT can be varied from Rr to (Rr + 0.5R) as δ is changed from 1 to 0.

A closed-loop speed control scheme with inner current control loop is


shown in Fig. 6.52. Rotor current Ir and therefore, Id has a constant value
at the maximum torque point, both during motoring and plugging. If the
current limiter is made to saturate at this current, the drive will accelerate
and decelerate at the maximum torque, giving very fast transient
response. For plugging to occur, arrangement will have to be made for
reversal of phase sequence.
Compared to conventional Rotor Resistance Control of Induction Motor,
static rotor resistance control has several advantages such as smooth and
stepless control, fast response, less maintenance, compact size, simple
closed-loop control and rotor resistance remains balanced between the
three phases for all operating points.

You might also like