Contingency Plan Canarem Es
Contingency Plan Canarem Es
Contingency Plan Canarem Es
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
VICTORIA EAST DISTRICT
CANAREM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Contingency
Plan for
FIRE
CANAREM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 106778
Contingency Plan
for FIRE
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
a. Goal
b. Objectives
CHAPTER I – Background
A. Introduction
Baseline Data A. Infrastructure and Non-Infrastructure
Baseline Data B. (Learners, Teaching and Non-teaching Personnel)
B. CP Form 1 - Hazard Analysis
C. CP Form 2: Anatomy of the Hazard
D. CP Form 3A:
Scenario Generation
CP Form 4A.1:
Affected Learners CP
Form 4A.2: Affected
Personnel
CP Form 4B.1: Breakdown of Affected
Learners CP Form 4B.2: Breakdown
of Affected Personnel
CHAPTER IV – Activation,
Deactivation and Non-
Activation
Annexes
Signatories
PREFACE
A .Goal
Natural disasters and calamities are like thieves that attack and visit us in
times that we are not really expecting to come. As a result, drastic damage to the
life, property and socio-economic lives of the people are the major effects of these
natural hazards. It is therefore indispensable for us to be updated and implement
the DRRM prevention and preparedness measures in school.
The goal of the contingency plan is to provide effective, efficient, timely and well-
coordinated response mechanisms in the event of the occurrence of a Fire
Incident in Canarem Elementary School. Such mechanisms shall help to protect
lives, properties, and the environment, and restore the immediate needs of the
affected communities.
B.General Objective(s)
1. To ensure the protection of lives and properties in the event of the Fire
Incident in Canarem Elementary School;
2. To determine the immediate needs and the resources that will meet the
needs in the event of Fire Incident;
3. To establish coordination and linkages between and among the
stakeholders of CanaremElementary School in the event of Fire Incident;
4. To enhance the capacity, ability and skills of the school personnel, school
head teachers, students and stakeholders on how they will response and
manage themselves before, during and after a Fire Incident;
5. To lessen the effect and impact of the disaster through appropriate
formulation of planned preparedness, mitigation and prevention, response
and rehabilitation & recovery phases programs and activities;
6. To monitor and evaluate and review the School DRRM preparedness and
mitigation planned programs and activities regarding a Fire Incident.
CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
Our educational landscape in the past years has been challenged by the threats brought by the
COVID-19 Pandemic. With that, our country is tasked to create an improved system in the
different sectors of society particularly in the health and education sectors to cope with the
ever-changing needs because of this health crisis. Due to the restrictions implemented by the
government to control the spread of infection, the regular face-to-face class is transitioned into
distance learning whether modular or online. In this way, every Filipino learner is required to
stay and learn at home so that their health will not be at risk.
Various undertakings were conducted by the school head and teachers of Canarem ES to
reach every learner, particularly during enrollment. Aside from the enrollment kiosk in the
school, drop boxes were distributed where they can get and submit their Modified Learner
This activity paved the way for the school to have 260 enrollees and to collect enough
data on what learning mode they will utilize. Based on the results of the survey using the
MLESF, the majority of the parents and pupils in Canarem Elementary School preferred the
Modular Distance Learning-Print as their learning modality because it is cost-efficient, and they
Parents' cooperation is evident even in modular distance learning because some of them serve
as purok parent leaders responsible for getting and submitting the printed modules to the
school. More so, to ensure the continuity of education as well as to enhance the learning of the
pupils, modular distance learning is supplemented with Radio-Based Instruction (RBI) through
the
60
51
50
38 39
40 34
32 30 29
30
20
10 0
Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
00 1 00 4 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0
Television
Radio
Modular Learning
Combination of face to face with other modalities
The graph on distance learning modalities preferred to the child evidently reveals that almost
all the parents preferred the combination of face to face with other modalities. This figure
reflects that the parents really believe that face-to-face class is very important in the learning of
20
15
15
10 7
5 5 4
5 2
0
0
Internet Connection
This graph shows that below half of the total school population or only few pupils have access
In this graph, the most common device available at home that the learner can use for learning is
Owing to the new learning modes, learners undergone lots of adjustment from their routines,
activities, and learning styles. Their motivation and interest in learning are also affected
particularly by the support exerted by their parents or guardians and their learning environment
at home. With that, the teachers conducted home visitation to effectively communicate with
parents specially those who do not have gadgets and to monitor the pupils if they need
instructional assistance.
Furthermore, the school also take part in organizing online kumustahan episodes and
psychosocial support for learners. School-based webinar on parent’s involvement amidst crisis
and virtual kumustahan with parents on distance learning are organized to effectively help the
Despite the challenges, Canarem Elementary School continually exert efforts to ensure
that quality education is delivered to every learner. As a result, achievement rate increased,
the school has a zero drop-out rate, and interventions and remediation activities are conducted
The second school year took a greater challenge as we move to limited face-to-face
education, though it is a positive manifestation that pandemic has passed and that we made to
survive.
The sudden shift from modular to limited face-to-face took the school a lot of preparations. It
has to be compliant with the school safety assessment tool. These preparations include
physical structuring of the classrooms and school grounds, traffic management system,
The school was able to gain the stakeholders’ trust and confidence as 98.46% of the
one the first 4 schools to implement LF2F in the district and a SSAT compliant. We adhere to
health and safety protocols while giving our best to ensure quality education. However,
academic profiling had been undergone and had found out that a number of pupils
unfortunately did not meet the competencies expected of them, mostly are lagging behind in
As a result, teachers and school head had to strategize to resolve the gaps. Close
monitoring of classes, technical supervision and giving of technical assistance were done.
Remediation and interventions were initiated, however, it really takes thorough diagnosis of the
This School Learning Recovery Plan was crafted to address the academic issues. It
To expand the horizon of teaching and learning, Canarem Elementary School employ
practices for the betterment of instruction and to cope with the educational needs and trends.
As a starting point, Mdm. Marilyn G. Olivo presented the Basic Education Learning Continuity
Plan of the school to the teachers and stakeholders during the presentation and commitment
signing. The BEL-COP specify the plan for continuing education strategies to ensure that
In addition, the school head and teachers also implemented various project innovations
under curriculum and instruction that helped improve the teaching and learning process
namely Project CHILD, READ, SAGIP, KALINGA, KAYA, MELCS, PASS, EASE,
PAGKAKAISA, and 3Ps) and under school governance and operations such as Project
ADOPT, STAR, REWARD, 4S, and ADOPT A FAMILY, DONATE A RADIO). More so, to
address the problems on pupils who needs instructional assistance, Modular Distance
Learning- Print is paired with Radio-Based Instruction wherein classes are conducted via radio
broadcast through the school’s radio station 98.9 FM KinigAral sa Radyo (Project CANAREM
ES Radio).
The support given by the stakeholders also produced beneficial results, their voluntary
donations such as bond papers, inks, and printers filled the needs of the school when it comes
to the printing of self-learning modules and learning activity sheets. The printed compendium of
notes and self-learning modules received by the school from the division office is very helpful
Congruent to the SDO Tarlac’s priorities, Canarem ES also ensures that the teaching and
non-Teaching Personnel as well as the learners are protected and secured against the COVID-
19 virus. First, the vaccination of teaching and non-teaching staff supported by the LGU-
Victoria and Provincial Government of Tarlac and CES learners also participated in the
RESBAKUNA for Kids. Second, teachers also participated in various online courses, webinars,
training, and workshops in different levels that paved the way on their professional
development and to equip them with enough knowledge and skills that they can use in the
delivery of quality education. Third, health supplies were also provided like alcohol, facemasks,
and thermal scanners. Lastly, disinfection of the school and classrooms were done to ensure
The school head also provide technical assistance to teachers to guide them as they
utilize or implement the Most Essential Learning Competencies during instruction. The number
The achievements of Canarem ES amidst the pandemic is a collective effort of the school
head, teachers, parents, pupils, and other stakeholders. The school received the Division
Outstanding Research Management 2021 because of its active participation in research writing
Also, CES achieved the Advanced or Level III SBM Level of Practice.
Picture of Canarem Elementary School
BASELINE DATA A.
INFRASTRUCTURE
No. of Classrooms
Type of Year Current Status
Source of Funding
Building Constructed of Building
Instructional Rooms Non-Instructional
(Acad/Non-Acad) Rooms
Marcos Pre- 1969 DepEd GOOD 2 2
Fabricated School
Building (Marcos
Type)
Bagong Lipunan 1977 DepED GOOD 3 0
School Building
(BLSB) Type I
Bagong Lipunan 1988 DepEd GOOD 3 0
School Building
(BLSB) Type I
Canteen 2009 DepED GOOD 0 1
DPWH-BOD 1996 DepEd GOOD 2 0
School Building
Marcos Pre- 1969 DepEd GOOD 1 1
Fabricated School
Building (Marcos
Type)
TOTAL 11 4
NON-INFRASTRUCTURE
Kindgerten 0 2 0 5 20 1 1
Grade 1- 0 2 0 4 22 1 1
Masunurin
Grade 1- 0 2 0 13 0 1 1
Masipag
Grade 2- 0 2 39 0 0 1 1
Mapagmahal
Grade 3 0 2 33 0 0 1 1
Matapat
Grade4 0 2 25 0 0 1 1
Maasahan
Grade 4 Matipid 0 2 25 0 0 1 1
Grade5 0 2 0 4 22 1 1
Mapagbigay
Grade 6 0 2 0 4 31 1 1
Masipnop
Total 0 18 122 30 93 9 9
BASELINE DATA B.1 LEARNERS
GRAND TOTAL 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0
B. HAZARD ANALYSIS
CP Form 1: Hazard Analysis
PROBABILITY IMPACT AVERAGE RANK
HAZARD RATE EARLY WARNING RATE** REMARKS PROBABILITY +
* SIGNS IMPACT 2
The school is
built/located in a
densely populated
residential area, there
Ground Shaking, are no wide areas for
7.2 Magnitude
4 Erratic behavior 5 safe evacuation both 5
Earthquake 1
of animals. inside and outside.
The listed hazards that have a high probability of occurrence in the school served as the foundation for the formulated CP Form 1
(Hazard Analysis). The various hazards are also classified based on their potential impact on the school, learners, personnel, and
school infrastructure. The various hazards are ranked based on their likelihood of occurrence and impact. Each hazard has its own
set of Early Warning Signs except for Earthquake because there is such device can predict for an earthquake. Remarks are based
on the school's existing state and vulnerability to various hazards.
C. Hazard to Plan for: FIRE
● Attend Seminars,
● Huddled
● Limited fire exits Trainings, Lectures and
households and
available in the school Workshops (Fire
faulty electrical
that might cause Prevention).
installation along ● Presence and
stampedes during fire.
the street outside of accumulating smoke,
● Orientation of Family
the school buildup of flames
● Insufficient fire Reunification Plan (Family
premises. detection of fire
equipment (fire Preparedness Plan) to
alarms.
extinguisher, wet/dry Parents and Pupils.
Poor electrical
pipe) to be used for fire
installation of
suppression. ● Procurement of Emergency
Equipment in
Equipment such as Fire
school facilities.
Extinguishers, Emergency
Kits First Aid Kits, Food
Packs.
By identifying the causes of the hazard, CP Form 2 (Anatomy of Hazard) is accomplished. The Annual Fire Inspection conducted by the
BFP-Pasig Fire Department and School Student-led Watching and Hazard Mapping carried out by BERT officers are the basis for the
formulation of fire hazard anatomy. One of the primary causes of fire risk is the school's surrounding infrastructure, which is congested of
residences and has poor electrical installations. Another major factor in school fire incident is improper electrical equipment installation
(including Smart TVs, WiFi modems, electric fans, etc.). Based on the listed triggering factors, all fire mitigation steps are taken.
D. Scenario Generation
Transportation Few roads are unpassable. Several roads are unpassable. All roads are no longer passable.
Even the local responders are
While the responders are
All local responders are able to unable to address the
Response Capabilities mobilized, there is a need
address the situation. situation; they are part of the
for augmentation.
victims as well.
Communication lines are still Communication lines are Communication lines are totally
Communication
operational. disrupted in some areas. cut.
Power is interrupted in some
No power interruption.
areas. Electricity is Total power shutdown in entire
Power / Electricity Electricity is operational in all
operational in several building school buildings.
building floors and
floors and classroom.
classroom.
Scenario Generation CP Form 3.A is a method for providing definite situations based on facts in order to arrive at a plan of
action. It provides us with the ability to lessen, if not completely eliminate, the effects of disasters. The overall number of affected
learners and personnel is calculated based on the proportion assigned to each scenario, from bad to worse. This form
additionally elaborates on the vulnerability of infrastructure and non-infrastructure. CP Form 3.A focuses on the worst-case
scenario of a fire hazard, in which the school is completely consumed/damaged by fire and significant injuries are sustained by
80% of learners, teachers, and non- teaching personnel.
DISPLACED POPULATION
NO. OF
GRADE NO. OF LEARNERS INSIDE NO. OF LEARNERS OUTSIDE REASONS FOR
AREA / LOCATION AFFECTED
EVACUATION CENTER EVACUATION CENTER DISPLACEMENT
LEVEL LEARNERS
Kinder 30 0 30 The school is
Grade 1 22 0 22 built/located in a
Grade 2 39 0 39 densely populated
Bagong Lipunan Grade 3 33 0 33 residential area, there
Building 1 and 2 are no wide areas for
Grade 4 25 1 24 safe evacuation both
Grade 1 19 0 19 inside and outside the
Grade 5 40 0 40 school premises.
Grade 6 31 0 31
BOD and Marcos Grade 4 25 0 25 The households
Buiilding around the school area
TOTAL 264 1 263 are made of light
materials, a substantial
percentage of them are
destroyed by fire.
Based on Baseline Data B.1 as of November 2022, the total number of affected learners in CP Form 4A.1 is projected. It represents the total number of
officially enrolled students in the S.Y. 2022-2023. The overall projected number of displaced population (learners within and outside the evacuation center)
is based on the fire-related situations/scenarios.
BREAKDOWN
NO. OF (FILL-UP ONLY WHEN APPROPRIATE)
AREA/
LEARNERS
LOCATION Learners
AFFECTED IP Muslim ALS
Kinder – Grade 3 Grade 4 - 6 With Others
Learners Learners Learners
Disability
M F Male Female Male Female M F M F M F M F
Marcos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Building 1
44 47 44 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bagong
Lipunan 1
49 28 33 19 16 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bagong
Lipunan 2
Marcos 14 11 0 0 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Building 2
BOD 38 33 0 0 38 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
145 119 77 66 68 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL
The outcome of CP Form 4B.1 (Breakdown of Affected Learners) is based on the projected affected learners in CP Form 4A.1. This form shows the
breakdown of affected learners by grade level, IP learners, learners with disabilities, Muslim learners, and ALS learners. It is also classified per building.
Marcos Building 1 0 0 2 2
Bagong Lipunan 1 0 3 0 0 0
Bagong Lipunan 2 0 3 0 0 0
Marcos Building 2 1 0 0 0 0
BOD 1 2 0 0 0
TOTAL 2 8 2 2 0
The outcome of CP Form 4B.2 (Breakdown of Affected Teaching and Non-teaching Personnel) is based on the projected
affected teaching and non-teaching personnel in CP Form 4A.1. This form shows the breakdown of affected teaching and non-
teaching personnel. It is also classified per building
CHAPTER II: CAPACITIES AND VULNERABILITIES
Risk 1. Understanding of The school conducted Not all Unsafe face to face
Understanding Hazards and its orientation to the students and class may happen.
characteristics parents, teachers and parents are
students about the participating in
hazards of the orientation
implementing face to
face classses.
2. Conduct of Risk Accomplished School Not all students not all students and
Assessment Watching Team and parents is parents know how
Hazard Mapping aware in hazard to hazard map.
mapping
Communication 1. Understanding All is well informed in Some parents Not all parents and
of advisory the advisories. and students is students can
including warning not familiar to afford
signals all advisories gadgets/loads for
telecommunication
.
2. Understanding The SDRRM
and implementation Coordinator / Focal
of DO 21 s.2015 person aware the late update on low
content of DO 21 drrmo connection/school
s.2015 communication drrm coor teaching
/memo overload
3. Equipment Limited tools Lack of budget
The school has
and equipment
equipment in
response to hazard.
Monitoring 1. Monitoring of School Division Office
preparedness/conti regularly Monitored Poor disaster
ngency plan and suggest to make unfinished management
of school conplan for flood contigency plan and high risk.
2. Monitoring of
hazard The LGU monitored
situation, including the hazard
communicating with situation by
school officials, communicating from
district/division DDRRMO to
office and LGU SDRRMO
3. Monitoring
RADaR
completion,
validation and Every
submission to incident/disaters
Central MOVs is submitted in
Office Radar
4. Monitoring of The school is
implementation implementing
of support for the DEPed
learning learning
continuity continuity plan.
cannot provide
5. Emergency able to provide hot mass number of
School Feeding meals minimal fund meals.
6. Learner's Kits Not all students
and personnel No access for
7. Teacher's Kits have personal emergency kits
8. Hygiene kits emergency kits in an emergency
9. Provision of The school installed in Limited facilities
Water different facilities of of hand
Sanitation and Hand Sanitation and sanitation and
Hygiene disinfection disinfection lack of budget
services
10. Updated
disaggregated
data on learners
and master list of
students in school
and alternative
learning schools
(ALS)
11. Clean up drives The school student
organization have
clean up drive
programs and
campaigns
12. Signed With verbal No sgned No guaranteed
memorandum of
agreement
support from
(MOA) with partnership with
memorandum private
private private enterprises
partners.
enterprises for
emergency purchase
Support for 1. Signed
Schools used as memorandum of
Evacuation agreement (MOA)
No guaranteed
Centers between LGU and
support from LGU
school on the use of School is available No signed
incase of damage
schools as whenever needed. memorandum
property during
evacuation center
evacuation.
including the roles
and responsibilities
of both institutions;
2. Repair,
maintenance and
replacement of
schools identified
as evacuation
center by the LGU
3. Resumption
Strategies
including
assessment of
readiness of the
schools
4. Establish
functional referral
pathways to respond
to child protection
concerns using the
existing PNP and
DSWD operational
guidelines
8. Feedback
mechanism to report
gaps in the delivery
of services,
grievances and other
needs to improve
education
interventions
9. Twinning of
schools for
teachervolunteers
for deployment in
the affected schools
that need additional
volunteers
Fund Sources
CHAPTER III: RESPONSE AND ARRANGEMENTS
A. Cluster Identification
AGENCIES/OFFICES INVOLVED
(NUMBER OF FIELDS CAN BE INCREASED OR REDUCED)
LEAD
RESPONSE CLUSTER
MDRRMO AGENCY/OFFICE
MEO/
SDRRMO MHO MSWDO AFP PNP BFP
DPWH /
BDRRMO
Canarem Elementary
Education Cluster / / / / / / / /
School
Food and Non-food / / / / / / / BDRRMO
Law and Order/Safety and
/ / / / / PNP
Security
Search, Rescue and
/ / / / / / / AFP
Retrieval
Water Sanitation and
/ / / / / / / / MHO
Hygiene WASH Area
Logistics / / / / / MDRRMO
Delivery of Essential Relief,
Camp Coordination and / / / / / / / / MSWDO
Camp Management
Emergency
/ / / / / / TARELCO
Telecommunications
Fire Brigade / / / / / BFP
CP Form 5B: Summary of Cluster Identification
All Agencies/Offices involved in the event of a fire were listed on CP Forms 5A and 5B (Cluster Identification). The various Agencies/Offices are
divided into Response Clusters. A Lead Agency/Office is designated to a specific response action based on their capacities and resources.
Each Response Cluster has its own set of members, as does the Lead Agency/Office. When it comes to fire incidents, different Response
Clusters are established based on the needs of the school.
B.Response Activities
RESPONSE
EDUCATION CLUSTER
CLUSTER
Cluster Objective:
Ensures that children and youth are included in community-based disaster risk reduction
and management and climate change adaptation activities in the community;
Ensures that the private and public organizations and agencies are involved in DRR and
CCA activities;
Educates people especially the most vulnerable groups in the community on disaster risk
reduction and management and climate change adaptation;
Develops information education campaign materials on DRR and CCA and share these to
the public.
TIMEFRAME RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES/OFFICES
Before Conduct safety awareness and
preparedness. SDRRM/ SDO TARLAC PROVINCE/BDRRM
⮚ Conduct simulation drill and always
participated in National Simultaneous
Earthquake Drill (NSED) Quarterly.
⮚ Conduct Hazard Mapping and Risk
Assessment.
⮚ Familiarization of Evacuation Map
During Locate Responsible Officer SDRRM/ SDO TARLAC PROVINCE /BDRRM
Provide immediate head count of
learners, Teaching and Non-Teaching.
Immediate attention to those affected
learners, teaching, and non-
teaching.
After (0-24 hours) To provide psychosocial support to MSWD/SDO TARLAC PROVINCE
all learners during calamities.
To ensure the LCP (Learning Continuity
Plan) during calamities.
Within 24 to 72 hours To provide continuous education MSWD/DEPED
through the TLS (Temporary
Learning Space)
Cluster Objective:
To ensure Food Security
To ensure availability of potable water supply
To ensure adequate living conditions of vulnerable displaced people in camps through
adequate shelter and non-food items support.
Cluster Objective:
To provide search and rescue operations for the trapped survivors after Fire Incident
First aid and medical assistance should be provided for earthquake survivors.
Cluster Objective:
To ensure precautions to protect everyone’s safety in the event of a fire incident
To provide timely effective assistance to an affective population.
RESPONSE CLUSTER DELIVERY OF ESSENTIAL RELIEF, CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT
Cluster Objective:
Ensures that the information of each evacuee in the evacuation center or
evacuation area/site are complete and updated;
Ensures that all facilities and materials in the evacuation centers/sites are available
and ready to use during evacuation.
TIMEFRAME RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES/OFFICES
Before Ensures that all persons or staff
involved in evacuation and camp SDRRM/BDRRM/MDRRMO
management are trained or at least
have knowledge of camp
management.
Shall ensure coordination and
communication mechanisms are in-
place during disasters in other offices.
During Activate the SDRRM IMT. SDRRM/BDRRM/MDRRMO
Shall ensure databases of affected
evacuees are available and accessible
shall distribute the hot meals/Food for the
evacuees.
After (0-24 hours) To ensure Safety and Security MSWD/MDRRMO
of Evacuees.
To ensure that evacuees will have safe
and dignified stay in the evacuation centers
during disasters
Within 24 to 72 hours Undertake continuous monitoring, MSWD/DILG/MDRRMO
coordination for the response
from national government.
Cluster Objective:
To ensure effectiveness of communication for responders and support system.
To ensure public safety by providing open communication.
The response clusters involved in the scenario of a fire stated their response cluster objectives and response activities in CP Form 6
- Response Activities, with the timeframe of Before, During, and After the Fire Incident until Day 4. The various Lead Agencies/Offices in the
Response Cluster ensures that all of their duties and responsibilities are carried out within the timeframe specified, with the assistance of
other agencies/offices.
RESOURCE INVENTORY
CP Form 7: Resource Inventory
RESPONSE Search and Rescue
CLUSTER:
TEAM/ RESOURCE QUANTITY REMARKS
COMMITTEE
MDRRM Ambulance,
Emergency Medical
Team
BFP Fire Trucks, Search 2 2 Fire Trucks and 11
and Rescue Team SRT personnel
PNP Security Team
BDRRMO Ambulance, Medical
Team, Search and
Rescue Team
MHO Ambulance,
Emergency Medical
Team
RESPONSE CLUSTER: Law and Order/ Crowd Control/ Traffic/ Safety and
Security
TEAM/COMMITTEE RESOURCE QUANTITY REMARKS
PNP Security Team
AFP Security Team
OPS Security Team
BDRRMO Security Team
TPMO Traffic
Management Team
RESOURCE PROJECTION
CP Form 8: Resource Projection
implementing
agencies,
MOA/ MOU
implementing agencies,
MOA/ MOU
LORENA D. CABUBOS
CO-CHAIRPERSON/SDRRM COORDINATOR
As the Responsible and Accountable Official in the school, the School Head
shall serve as the Chairperson of the Chairperson of the School DRRM
Committee. To help/assist the Chairperson in ensuring that duties and
responsibilities of the SDRRMC are performed religiously, the Chairperson may
designate the School DRRM Coordinator to serve as the Co-Chairperson and
the Alternate SDRRM Coordinator (Non-Teaching) as Secretariat.
Aa
ANALYSIS OF ACTIVATE IMT
THE SCHOOL SCHOOL MOBILIZATION
SITUATION CONPLAN
CREATION OF EXECUTIVE
SCHOOL RESPONSE
CONTINGENCY
OLAN
IF YES
FIRE OCCURS
SITUATION
NORMALIZED
IF YES
IF YES
IF YES
IF YES
DEPLOY
RESPONDERS IMT DEMOBILIZE
IF YES
SITUATION
CONDUCT
NORMALIZED
REGULAR
OPERATION
Prepared by: Noted by:
Recommending Approval:
APPROVED