NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.

Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information

Designation: D 4280 – 04

Standard Specification for

Extended Life Type, Nonplowable, Raised Retroreflective
Pavement Markers1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 4280; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

1. Scope D 2171 Test Method for Viscosity of Asphalts by Vacuum

1.1 This specification covers nonplowable, retroreflective Capillary Viscometer
raised pavement markers for nighttime lane marking and D 2172 Test Methods for Quantitative Extraction of Bitu-
delineation. men from Bituminous Paving Mixtures
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the D 2669 Test Method for Apparent Viscosity of Petroleum
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information Waxes Compounded with Additives (Hot Melts)
only. D 4402 Test Method for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt
1.3 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the at Elevated Temperatures Using a Rotational Viscometer
test methods portion, Section 9, of this specification: This D 5329 Test Methods for Sealants and Fillers, Hot-Applied,
standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, for Joints and Cracks in Asphaltic and Portland Cement
if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user Concrete Pavements
of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health E 177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in

iTeh Standards
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limita- ASTM Test Methods
tions prior to use. E 284 Terminology of Appearance
E 691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards: 2
(https://standards.iteh.ai) E
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
808 Practice for Describing Retroreflection

Document Preview
C 184 Test Method for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by
the 150-µm (No. 100) and 75-µm (No. 200) Sieves 3
E 809 Practice for Measuring Photometric Characteristics
of Retroreflectors
C 430 Test Method for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by E 811 Practice for Measuring Colorimetric Characteristics
the 45-µm (No. 325) Sieve of Retroreflectors Under Nighttime Conditions
D 5 Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials
ASTM D4280-042.2 Federal Specifications:4
D https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04
36 Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring- TT-T-291 Thinner, Paint, Mineral Spirits, Regular and
and-Ball Apparatus) Odorless
D 70 Test Method for Specific Gravity and Density of 2.3 AASHTO Standards:5
Semi–Solid Bituminous Materials (Pycnometer Method) AASHTO M237 Epoxy Resin Adhesive for Bonding Traffic
D 92 Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Markers to Hardened Concrete
Open Cup Tester
3. Terminology
D 1754 Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on Asphaltic
Materials (Thin-Film Oven Test) 3.1 Definitions:
D 1785 Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plas- 3.1.1 cleanability—the ability of a raised retroreflective
tic Pipe, Schedules 40, 80, and 120 marker to keep its optical surfaces clean under traffic and
D 1856 Test Method for Recovery of Asphalt from Solution environmental conditions.
by Abson Method 3.1.2 coeffıcient of luminous intensity, RI—the ratio of the
luminous intensity (I) of the retroreflector in the direction of
1
observation to the illuminance (E) at the retroreflector on a
This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D04 on Road
and Paving Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D04.38 on
plane perpendicular to the direction of the incident light,
Highway Traffic Control Materials. expressed in candelas per lux (cd/lx) (see Practice E 808 and
Current edition approved July 1, 2004. Published July 2004. Originally approved Terminology E 284).
in 1983. Last previous edition approved in 2003 as D 4280 – 03.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
4
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
5
the ASTM website. Available from American Association of State Highway and Transportation
3
Withdrawn. Officials (AASHTO), 444 N. Capitol St., NW, Suite 249, Washington, DC 20001.

Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

1
 D 4280 – 04
3.1.2.1 Discussion—When values are low, the coefficient of 5.1.5 Flexural strength, if needed.
(retroreflected) luminous intensity may be given in millican- NOTE 1—Flexural strength is not critical when application is to portland
delas per lux. In inch-pound units, RI is given in candelas per cement concrete pavement, but is critical when application is to some soft
footcandle (cd/fc). Historically, the term “specific intensity” asphaltic concrete pavements.
and symbol (“SI”) have been used to designate this term but
“RI” is preferred. 6. Requirements for Retroreflective Markers
3.1.3 color—chromaticity, according to the CIE (Commis- 6.1 Construction:
sion Internationale de l’Eclairage) 1931 colorimetric system. 6.1.1 The marker shall be comprised of materials with
3.1.4 horizontal entrance angle—the angle in the horizontal adequate chemical, water, and UV resistance for the intended
plane between the direction of incident light and the normal to use.
the leading edge of the marker. 6.1.2 Marker height shall not exceed 20.3 mm (0.80 in.).
3.1.4.1 Discussion—This angle corresponds to the entrance 6.1.3 Marker width shall not exceed 130 mm (5.1 in.).
angle b2 when the marker is positioned for photometry. The 6.1.4 The angle between the face of the marker and the base
direction given in Practice E 808 should be used when desig- shall be no greater than 45°, except as provided in 6.1.4.1.
nating this angle. 6.1.4.1 If the angle between the face of the marker and the
3.1.5 observation angle—the angle between the illumina- base is greater than 45°, or if the marker front has protuber-
tion axis and the observation axis. (See also Practice E 808.) ances of more than 1 mm (0.04 in.), then as part of type
3.1.6 retroreflection—reflection in which radiation is re- acceptance, the marker shall be subjected to a 6-month road
turned in directions close to the direction from which it came, test during the time of the year when weather and traffic
this property being maintained over wide variations of the conditions are most critical to cleanability. Cleanability is
direction of incident radiation. determined by measuring coefficient of luminous intensity
3.1.7 retroreflective element—a minimal optical unit that before and after washing the marker lens.
produces retroreflection, for example, a cube corner or a 6.1.5 The base of the marker shall be substantially free from
biconvex structure. gloss or substances that may reduce its bond to adhesive.
4. Classification
iTeh Standards
4.1 Markers should be classified as to type, color, and
6.1.6 The base of the marker shall be flat within 1.3 mm
(0.05 in.). If the bottom of the marker is configurated, the

(https://standards.iteh.ai)
protruding faces of the configurations shall not deviate more
abrasion resistance. than 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) from a plane.
4.1.1 Types of Markers: 6.1.7 Construction not meeting the requirements of 6.1.2,
Document Preview
4.1.1.1 Type A—Two-way reflective markers, one color. 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.1.6, or 6.1.7, but meeting the performance
4.1.1.2 Type B—One-way reflective markers, one color. requirements of 6.2, will be acceptable following a 12-month
4.1.1.3 Type E—Two-way reflective markers, two colors. road test to determine cleanability, durability, and adhesion to
4.1.2 Retroreflected Color of Markers: the road.
4.1.2.1 W—White. ASTM D4280-04
6.2 Performance Requirements:
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04
4.1.2.2 Y—Yellow. 6.2.1 Retroreflectivity:
4.1.2.3 R—Red. 6.2.1.1 For new markers, coefficient of luminous intensity
4.1.2.4 B—Blue. (RI) measured in accordance with 9.1 shall be not less than the
4.1.2.5 G—Green. values in Table 1.
4.1.3 Abrasion Resistance: 6.2.1.2 For abrasion resistant markers, after abrading the
4.1.3.1 Designated H—Marker with hard, abrasion-resistant marker per 9.5, coefficient of luminous intensity at 0° entrance
lens surface. angle measured in accordance with 9.1 shall be not less than
4.1.4 Flexural Strength: the values in Table 1 multiplied by 0.5.
4.1.4.1 Designated F—Marker with sufficient longitudinal
strength for application to flexible, asphaltic concrete pave- NOTE 2—No abrasion resistance test has been established for markers
ment. having biconvex optical elements.
4.2 Show classification in the order detailed in 4.1.1 through NOTE 3—Some two-color markers may intentionally have only one of
4.1.3.1: type, color, abrasion resistance, and flexural strength. the retroreflective faces abrasion resistant, in which case, the second face
should not be abraded.
For example, ERWF is a two-way red-and-white marker
NOTE 4—No laboratory abrasion test can be expected to model the full
without abrasion resistant surface and with sufficient flexural
range of surface wear of pavement markers in use.
strength for application to flexible pavement.
6.2.2 Because no practical laboratory procedures have been
5. Ordering Information determined to provide complete, reliable, and predictive infor-
5.1 Orders for material under this specification should mation on adhesive bond strength, the user is encouraged to
include the following information: seek information from alternative sources such as field tests. A
5.1.1 Quantity, field test of duration 12 months is recommended. A control
5.1.2 Type of marker: retroreflective one way, or retrore- marker is chosen with known satisfactory adhesion. The test
flective two way, markers may be required to experience no more than 1.5 times
5.1.3 Color of marker, as great an adhesion failure rate as the controls. The test
5.1.4 Abrasion resistance, if needed, and severity should be such that between 3 % and 20 % of the

2
 D 4280 – 04
TABLE 1 Coefficient of Luminous Intensity RI
NOTE 1—The retroreflector axis and datum axis of the marker are as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
NOTE 2—Entrance angle component b1 and rotation angle e are 0°.
NOTE 3—The SI values in the table are to be regarded as the standard. The inch-pound values are provided for information.
Minimum Value RI, mcd/lx
Entrance Angle Component b2 Observation Angle a
White Yellow Red Green Blue
0° 0.2° 279 167 70 93 26
+ 20°/−20° 0.2° 112 67 28 37 10
Minimum Value RI, cd/fc
Entrance Angle Component b2 Observation Angle a
White Yellow Red Green Blue
0° 0.2° 3.0 1.8 0.75 1.0 0.28
+ 20°/−20° 0.2° 1.2 0.72 0.30 0.4 0.11

controls fail during the field test. There must be adequate Point No. x y
numbers of test markers and controls for statistical validity. 1 0.310 0.348
2 0.453 0.440
6.2.3 Physical Properties: 3 0.500 0.440
6.2.3.1 Flexural Strength (designation F markers only)— 4 0.500 0.380
When tested in accordance with 9.2.1, a marker shall withstand 5 0.440 0.380
6 0.310 0.283
8914 N (909 kgf, 2000 lbf) without breakage.
6.2.4.2 Yellow
NOTE 5—Method 9.2.1 tests longitudinal flexural strength, distinct
from the flexural strength tested in previous editions of this specification. Point No. x y
1 0.545 0.424
6.2.3.2 Compressive Strength—When tested in accordance 2 0.559 0.439
3 0.609 0.390
with 9.2.2, a marker shall support a load of 2727 kg (6000 lb) 4 0.597 0.390

in.).
iTeh Standards
without breakage or significant deformation of the marker.
6.2.4.3 Red
Significant deformation shall be understood to be 3.3 mm (0.13
Point No. x y

(https://standards.iteh.ai)
6.2.4 Color—When the retroreflector is illuminated by CIE
Standard Source A and when measured in accordance with 9.3,
1
2
3
0.650
0.668
0.734
0.330
0.330
0.265

Document Preview
the color of the retroreflected light shall fall within the color 4 0.721 0.259

gamuts given by the following corner points and shown in Fig.

6.2.4.4 Blue
1. Point No. x y
6.2.4.1 White 1 0.039 0.320
ASTM D4280-04 2 0.160 0.320
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04
3
4
0.160
0.183
0.240
0.218
5 0.088 0.142

6.2.4.5 Green
Point No. x y
1 0.009 0.733
2 0.288 0.520
3 0.209 0.395
4 0.012 0.494

6.2.5 Resistance to Lens Cracking:

6.2.5.1 Lens Impact Strength—When impacted in accor-
dance with 9.4.1, the face of the lens shall show no more than
two radial cracks longer than 6.4 mm (0.25 in.). There shall be
no radial cracks extending to the edge of the abrasion resistant
area. There shall be no delamination.
6.2.5.2 Temperature Cycling—When subjected to tempera-
ture cycling in accordance with 9.4.2, there shall be no
cracking or delamination.

7. Sampling
7.1 For markers not resistant to abrasion, sample size shall
be 20 markers for each lot of 10 000 markers or less and 40
markers for each lot of more than 10 000 markers. For markers
with an abrasion-resistant surface, ten additional samples shall
FIG. 1 Color Gamut per 6.2.4 be required. Lot size shall not exceed 25 000 markers.

3
 D 4280 – 04
8. Number of Tests and Retests larger than 0.1°. Angular aperture of the retroreflective ele-
8.1 For coefficient of luminous intensity (9.1.1), the entire ments shall be no larger than 0.02°. If the retroreflective
sample of retroreflective pavement markers shall be tested. elements are no larger than 5.3 mm (0.21 in.) in diameter,
Failure of more than 10 % of the reflective faces shall be cause suggested test dimensions are 15.2-m (50-ft) distance,
for rejection of the entire lot represented by the sample. For 25.4-mm (1.0-in.) diameter receptor, and 25.4-mm (1.0-in.)
abrasion resistant markers, in addition to the test of 9.1.1, four diameter source. Other test distances are acceptable provided
reflective faces passing the photometric requirements of 9.1.1 that the stated angular aperture requirements are met and that
shall be subjected to abrasion (9.1.2) and remeasured; failure of the marker subtends no more than 1° at the source. Measure the
more than one sample shall be cause for rejection of the entire distance from the light source exit pupil to the center of the
lot. retroreflective face of the marker. The base of the marker shall
8.2 For longitudinal flexural strength (9.2.1), compressive lie on a plane parallel to the illumination axis and perpendicu-
strength (9.2.2), and color (9.3), three specimens shall be lar to the observation half-plane. Refer to Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and
tested. Specimens previously subjected to photometry (9.1.1), Practice E 809. Any vertical surfaces on the marker, for
color (9.3), and the abrasion specified for 9.1.2 are acceptable example, on its leading edge, that could specularly reflect the
for tests of longitudinal flexural strength (9.2.1) and compres- source into the receiver shall be covered. The tolerance on
sive strength (9.2.2). Failure of more than one specimen shall entrance angle shall be 60.5°. Maintain laboratory and condi-
be cause for rejection of the entire lot. tion markers to 23 6 2°C, 50 6 25 % RH.
8.3 For lens impact strength (9.4.1) and resistance to tem- 9.1.1.1 Before photometry, gently wipe the face of the
perature cycling (9.4.2), ten specimens shall be tested for each marker with a soft damp towel, then dry with a soft towel.
requirement. Failure of more than one of the specimens in 9.1.2 Interlaboratory Study of Precision6:
either test shall be cause for rejection of the entire lot. 9.1.2.1 The calculations, results, and terminology used to
8.4 In the event of failure that would result in rejection of a prepare this statement are in accordance with Practice E 691.
lot, and at the discretion of the purchaser, a resample may be 9.1.2.2 A set of markers conforming to this specification
taken consisting of double the number of samples originally was photometered at six laboratories. The set comprised 150

iTeh Standards
tested. Tolerances for resamples shall be in the same ratio as lenses, equally divided among the five colors of 6.2.4 and also
specified above. equally divided among three optical types: those having prisms
approximately 2.5 mm in diameter; those having prisms
9. Test Methods
(https://standards.iteh.ai)
9.1 Coeffıcient of Luminous Intensity:
approximately 0.3 mm in diameter; and those having discrete
biconvex elements.

Document
9.1.1 Procedure—Measure coefficient of luminous intensity
in accordance with Practice E 809. Angular aperture of the Preview 6
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may
source and angular aperture of the receiver shall each be no be obtained by requesting Research Report RR: D04–1026.

ASTM D4280-04
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04

FIG. 2 Position of Marker for Photometry, 0° Entrance Angle

4
 D 4280 – 04

iTeh Standards
FIG. 3 Position of Marker for Photometry, +20° Entrance Angle

(https://standards.iteh.ai)
9.1.2.3 Each laboratory photometered each lens at 0.2° 9.2.1.2 Place two 12.7 by 25.4 mm (0.5 by 1.0 in.) steel
Document12.7-mm
observation angle at each of 0°, +20°, and −20° entrance angles
in accordance with 9.1.1, and the measurements were repeated
Preview
bars, each longer than the width of the marker base, on their
(0.5-in.) faces, onto the platen of the compression
on a second day. apparatus. Place durometer 70 Shore A elastomeric pads
9.1.2.4 The precision statistics are given in TableASTM 2. For D4280-04
approximately 3 mm (0.12 in.) thick onto the bars. Place
each lens, precision statistics were calculated as percentages of marker base down onto the pads. Marker shall have its
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04
the interlaboratory mean RI value for that lens. The precision lengthwise (roadway) direction perpendicular to the two bars.
statistics were averaged over the ten specimens of like color Spacing of bars shall depend on length of marker base, being
and optical type. The precision statistics for +20° entrance as great as possible without bars protruding beyond the
angle and for −20° entrance angle were averaged for the extreme lengthwise points of the marker base. Place a durom-
reported 620° entrance angle. The differences in precision eter 70 Shore A elastomeric pad approximately 25 mm (1 in.)
statistics among the five colors was small enough to allow thick and larger than the marker top on top of marker. Place a
average values to be reported. The differences in precision third 12.7 by 25.4 mm (0.5 by 1.0 in.) steel bar, longer than the
statistics among the three optical types was small enough to
width of marker top, on its 12.7-mm (0.5-in.) face onto the top
allow average values to be reported.
of the pad, positioned parallel to the other bars and centered
9.1.2.5 There is no estimate of bias. There is no reference
over the marker top (see Fig. 4).
laboratory in North America by which to establish bias for this
measurement. 9.2.1.3 Apply load to the top of the marker at a rate of 5.0
9.2 Physical Properties: mm (0.2 in.)/min through the top steel bar until the marker
9.2.1 Longitudinal Flexural Strength: breaks. Breakage shall constitute complete rupture or other loss
9.2.1.1 Condition markers at 23.0 6 2.0°C (73.4 6 3.6°F) of integrity evidenced by a sudden decrease in load. Record
for 4 h prior to testing. load at break to the nearest N (kgf, lbf).
9.2.1.4 Precision and Bias:
TABLE 2 Precision for Coefficient of Luminous Intensity (a) Interlaboratory Test Program—An interlaboratory study
Entrance sr sR r R of longitudinal flexural strength for nonplowable raised pave-
Angle Repeatability Reproducibility 95 % 95 % ment markers for extended life was conducted in accordance
Standard Standard Repeatability Reproducibility with Practice E 691 in eight laboratories using four marker
Deviation Deviation Limit Limit
models with ten nearly identical specimens of each model for
0° 1.5 % 6.7 % 4.1 % 18.5 %
620° 4.0 % 9.0 % 11.1 % 25.0 % each laboratory. The four marker models were of the following
constructions:

5
 D 4280 – 04

iTeh Standards
(https://standards.iteh.ai)
Document Preview
FIG. 4 Longitudinal Flexural Strength Test

1. marker with molded ABS body ASTM D4280-04

9.2.2.2 Position marker base down at the center of a 13-mm
2. marker with molded polycarbonate shell and interior
(0.5-in.) thick flat steel plate larger than the marker.
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/728c16e3-9866-4eb0-b59e-6d5821655f62/astm-d4280-04
3. marker with molded acrylic shell and urethane potting
4. marker with molded acrylic shell and urethane potting 9.2.2.3 On top of the marker, place a 9.5-mm (0.37-in.)
(1) Mean measurement values for the four models varied thick elastomeric pad larger than the marker and having a
from 990 kg to 1370 kg. Shore A durometer of 60.
(2) The individual statistical results for each set were 9.2.2.4 On top of the elastomeric pad, place a 13-mm
averaged to obtain one set of repeatability and reproducibility (0.5-in.) thick flat steel plate larger than the marker.
results. 9.2.2.5 Apply a load at a rate of 2.5 mm (0.1 in.)/ min.
(3) The terms repeatability limit and reproducibility limit are 9.3 Color—Measure color in accordance with Practice
used as specified in Practice E 177. E 811 at 0.2° observation angle and 0° entrance angle. The
(4) The precision statistics are given in Table 3. source and receptor angular apertures shall each be 6 min of
(b) Bias—Since there is no accepted reference material arc.
suitable for determining the bias for the procedure in this test
method for measuring longitudinal flexural strength, no state- 9.4 Resistance to Lens Cracking:
ment on bias is being made. 9.4.1 Lens Impact Strength—Condition the markers in a
9.2.2 Compressive Strength: convection oven at 55°C (130°F) for 1 h.
9.2.2.1 Condition markers at 23.0 6 2.0°C (73.4 6 3.6°F) 9.4.1.1 While at the elevated temperature, impact the reflec-
for 4 h prior to testing. tive face of the marker by allowing a 0.19-kg (0.42-lb) dart
fitted with a 6.4-mm (0.25-in.) radius semi-spherical head to
drop 457 mm (18 in.) perpendicularly onto the approximate
TABLE 3 Precision for Longitudinal Flexural Strength center of the reflective surface. For impact testing, set the
Material Repeatability Reproducibility Repeatability Reproducibility marker on a steel fixture designed to hold the reflecting face
Std. Dev. Std. Dev. Limit Limit
(%) (%) (%) (%)
horizontal, and place the fixture on a solid surface, such as a
concrete floor.
4 by 4 in. RPM 4.54 6.94 12.72 19.44
9.4.1.2 Inspect for cracking and delamination.