The Modes of Discourse - Notes
The Modes of Discourse - Notes
The Modes of Discourse - Notes
Speech events and schemata are important concepts in discourse analysis. It contributes to our
understanding of how language is used in communication.
Speech Event
A speech event refers to a communicative situation or context in which language is used for
specific purposes and within particular social norms and conventions. It involves not only the
verbal exchange but also the broader situational and cultural factors that influence
communication. Speech events can vary widely in terms of their characteristics, participants,
goals, and settings. Key elements of a speech event include:
Schemata
Schemata (singular: schema) refers to mental frameworks or cognitive structures that individuals
use to organize and interpret information. Schemata are developed through past experiences,
cultural knowledge, and social interactions, and they help individuals make sense of new
information by providing a framework for understanding and categorizing it. In the context of
discourse analysis, schemata influence both the production and comprehension of discourse,
shaping how language is used and interpreted.
Types of schemata include:
• Semantic Schemata: These involve knowledge about the meanings of words, concepts,
and symbols. Semantic schemata help individuals understand the content and significance
of discourse by relating it to their existing knowledge and experiences.
• Syntactic Schemata: These involve knowledge about the grammatical structure and
organization of language. Syntactic schemata help individuals interpret the syntax and
grammar of discourse, enabling them to extract meaning from sentences and texts.
• Pragmatic Schemata: These involve knowledge about the social and cultural conventions
governing language use in specific contexts. Pragmatic schemata help individuals
interpret the intended meanings of discourse by considering factors such as context, tone,
and speaker intentions.
A person's schema for a "restaurant" includes expectations about the types of food served, the
layout of the establishment, and the typical interactions with waitstaff.
A reader's schema for a "mystery novel" includes expectations about plot structure, character
development, and narrative conventions.
A listener's schema for a "job interview" includes expectations about appropriate behavior,
communication style, and interview questions.
In summary, speech events and schemata are both important concepts in discourse analysis,
providing insight into the social, cognitive, and cultural dimensions of communication. Speech
events help us understand the contextual factors shaping communication, while schemata help us
understand how individuals interpret and make sense of discourse based on their existing
knowledge and cognitive frameworks.
Spoken discourse and written discourse are two primary modes of communication, each with its
own characteristics shaped by factors such as context, audience, medium, and purpose. Here are
some key characteristics that distinguish spoken discourse from written discourse:
• Immediacy and Interactivity: Spoken discourse occurs in real-time and allows for
immediate interaction between speakers and listeners. It often involves turn-taking,
interruptions, overlaps, and backchannel cues (e.g., "uh-huh," "yeah") that signal
engagement and participation.
• Temporal Constraints: Spoken discourse is subject to temporal constraints, with speakers
producing language on the fly and adjusting their speech in response to the immediate
context. This can result in spontaneity, hesitations, repairs, and disfluencies (e.g., pauses,
repetitions).
• Paralinguistic Features: Spoken discourse includes paralinguistic features such as
intonation, stress, pitch, volume, and nonverbal cues (e.g., facial expressions, gestures,
body language) that convey additional layers of meaning, emotion, and emphasis.
• Informality: Spoken discourse often exhibits a more informal register compared to
written discourse. It may include colloquial language, contractions, slang, and
conversational fillers that reflect the natural rhythms and norms of everyday speech.
• Contextual Dependence: Spoken discourse relies heavily on contextual cues, shared
knowledge, and situational factors to convey meaning and facilitate understanding.
Participants may draw on shared experiences, cultural references, or shared knowledge to
co-construct meaning.
• Ephemeral Nature: Spoken discourse is typically ephemeral and transient, with utterances
disappearing once they are spoken. While recordings or transcripts can capture spoken
discourse, the live interaction and immediacy of spoken communication cannot be fully
replicated.
Overall, spoken discourse and written discourse each have unique characteristics that reflect the
dynamics of oral and written communication. While spoken discourse emphasizes immediacy,
interaction, and informal language, written discourse prioritizes permanence, complexity, and
formality. Understanding these differences is essential for effective communication in various
contexts and mediums.
In discourse analysis, the modes of discourse refer to different forms or styles of communication
that are used to convey meaning and achieve specific communicative goals. Each mode of
discourse has its own characteristic features, structures, and conventions, which shape how
information is organized and presented. Understanding the modes of discourse can help analyze
and interpret various types of communication, including written texts, spoken language, visual
media, and digital communication. There are several common modes of discourse:
1. Narrative Mode: The narrative mode involves telling a story or recounting a sequence of
events. Narratives typically have a plot structure, with characters, settings, conflicts, and
resolutions.
• Persuasive Mode: Similar to the argumentative mode, the persuasive mode aims to
influence the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors of the audience. However, persuasive
discourse may rely more on emotional appeals, rhetorical devices, and appeals to values
or desires.
• Interactive Mode: The interactive mode involves direct interaction and communication
between participants. It includes spoken dialogue, conversation, and other forms of
interactive discourse.
• Multimodal Mode: The multimodal mode involves the combination of different modes of
communication, such as text, images, sound, and video. Multimodal discourse can
convey meaning through various sensory channels simultaneously.
• Digital Mode: The digital mode involves communication mediated through digital
technologies, such as the internet, social media, and digital platforms. Digital discourse
may have unique characteristics, including interactivity, immediacy, and global reach.
These modes of discourse are not mutually exclusive, and texts or communicative acts often
combine elements from multiple modes to achieve their communicative goals. Analyzing the
mode of discourse helps uncover the underlying strategies and conventions used to create
meaning and engage with the audience.
Discourse Structure
Discourse structure refers to the organization and arrangement of elements within a piece of
discourse, whether it's spoken or written. It involves how ideas are sequenced, how sentences
and paragraphs are connected, and how the overall coherence and cohesion of the discourse are
achieved. Understanding discourse structure helps to analyze how meaning is constructed and
conveyed to the audience. There are several key components of discourse structure:
1. Macrostructure:
Macrostructure refers to the overarching organization of the entire discourse, including its main
sections or parts. These parts may include introduction, body, and conclusion in a written text, or
opening, development, and closing in a speech.
Example: In an academic essay, the macrostructure typically consists of an introduction
(providing background information and a thesis statement), body paragraphs (presenting
arguments or evidence), and a conclusion (summarizing key points and providing closure).
2. Microstructure:
Microstructure refers to the organization of smaller linguistic units within the discourse, such as
sentences, paragraphs, and clauses. It involves the sequencing of ideas, the use of transitions, and
the arrangement of information within individual units.
Example: In a paragraph discussing the causes of climate change, the microstructure might
include a topic sentence introducing the main idea, followed by supporting details and examples
arranged in a logical order.
Coherence refers to the overall sense of unity and logical flow within the discourse. Cohesion
refers to the linguistic devices used to create connections and relationships between different
parts of the discourse.
Example: Cohesive devices such as pronouns (e.g., "it," "they"), conjunctions (e.g., "and,"
"but"), and lexical repetition help maintain coherence and cohesion by linking ideas and
providing continuity between sentences and paragraphs.
4. Textual Features:
Textual features include elements such as headings, subheadings, bullet points, and formatting
styles that help structure and organize the discourse visually.
Example: In a technical report, headings and subheadings are used to divide the content into
sections and subsections, making it easier for readers to navigate and locate specific information.
5. Rhetorical Structure:
Example: A persuasive speech may follow a rhetorical structure that includes an attention-
grabbing introduction, a clear thesis statement, supporting arguments with evidence,
counterarguments addressed and refuted, and a memorable conclusion that reinforces the main
message.
Understanding discourse structure allows analysts to identify patterns, strategies, and
conventions used in communication, and to assess how effectively a piece of discourse achieves
its intended purpose and engages with its audience.
In discourse analysis, genres refer to recognizable patterns or types of communication that are
characterized by specific linguistic, structural, and functional features. Genres are social and
cultural constructs that emerge within particular communities or contexts, shaping how language
is used to achieve communicative goals. Analyzing genres in discourse provides insights into the
conventions, norms, and strategies employed by speakers or writers to create meaning and
interact with their audience. Here are key aspects of genres in discourse analysis:
1. Form and Structure: Genres exhibit characteristic forms and structures that help distinguish
them from other types of communication. This includes features such as organization, layout,
rhetorical devices, and linguistic choices.
Example: The form and structure of a news article typically include a headline, lead paragraph
summarizing the main points, body paragraphs providing details and analysis, and a conclusion.
2. Function and Purpose: Each genre serves specific communicative functions and purposes,
which may include informing, persuading, entertaining, or instructing the audience. The purpose
of a genre influences its content, style, and conventions.
3. Audience Expectations: Genres are shaped by the expectations and needs of their intended
audience. They fulfill specific audience expectations regarding content, format, tone, and style.
Example: Academic essays are tailored to meet the expectations of academic audiences,
including professors, peers, and researchers, by following conventions such as clear
argumentation, citation of sources, and adherence to academic standards.
4. Contextual Factors: Genres are influenced by the social, cultural, and situational contexts in
which they are used. Contextual factors such as cultural norms, institutional practices, and
historical traditions shape the conventions and conventions of genres.
Example: Legal documents, such as contracts or court judgments, adhere to specific legal
conventions and terminology that reflect the norms and practices of the legal profession.
5. Variability and Hybridity: While genres exhibit recognizable patterns and conventions, they
are not rigid or fixed categories. Genres can vary and evolve over time, and they may also blend
or hybridize with other genres to create new forms of communication.
Example: Digital genres, such as blogs or social media posts, combine elements of traditional
written genres with interactive features and multimedia content.
6. Genre Analysis: Genre analysis in discourse analysis involves examining the characteristics,
functions, and communicative purposes of different genres within specific contexts. It focuses on
identifying the conventions and rhetorical strategies employed in each genre to achieve its goals.
Example: A genre analysis of political speeches might explore the language, rhetoric, and
persuasive techniques used by politicians to appeal to their audience and advance their political
agendas.
Overall, genres play a central role in shaping communication practices and organizing discourse
within social and cultural contexts. Analyzing genres in discourse provides valuable insights into
how language is used to construct meaning, negotiate identities, and enact social roles within
different communities and contexts.
Example: Job interviews, research interviews, or media interviews with public figures.
Example: Formal debates in academic settings, political debates, or debates on current affairs.
Example: Folk tales, bedtime stories, personal anecdotes, or stand-up comedy routines.
1. Narrative: Narratives are written accounts of events, experiences, or stories. They typically
follow a chronological sequence and include elements such as characters, plot, setting, and
conflict.
4. Journalistic Writing:
Journalistic writing involves reporting news, events, or stories for newspapers, magazines, or
online publications. It follows journalistic conventions such as objectivity, accuracy, and balance.
These examples illustrate the diversity of genres in both spoken and written discourse, each
serving different purposes, audiences, and contexts. Understanding the conventions and
characteristics of genres helps writers and speakers effectively communicate their messages and
engage with their audiences.