ABSTRACT

The Cluster
Plan of the
Resettlement
Cluster is to
relocate
affected
families living
in hazard
prone areas to
safe areas and
to develop
sustainable and
disaster
resilient new
communities.

ANNEX D - RESETTLEMENT
CLUSTER REHABILITATION
AND RECOVERY PLAN

1
Table of Contents

I. GOAL .......................................................................................................................
II. OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................
III. HOUSING NEED AND TARGETS …………………………………….
IV. PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES ...................................................
A. LAND IDENTIFICATION, ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
B. HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
C. CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
D. SOCIAL PREPARATION
E. PROVISION FOR LIVELIHOOD
F. ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT..

V. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
VI. ACCOMPLISHMENTS
VII. BUDGETARY ESTIMATES FOR RESETTLEMENT PROJECTS
VIII. IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURE
A. NHA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS (NPIT)
B. LOCAL INTER-AGENCY COMMITTEE (LIAC)

IX. MONITORING, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION

Tables and Figures

Table 1. Permanent Housing Need and Budget Requirements……………….
Table 2. Resettlement Targets
Table 3. Resilient housing structural design standards
Table 4. Features of standard typhoon resilient rowhouse design with loft
Table 5A. Total Number of community facilities to be Built
Table 5B. Community facilities to be Built per Province/City
Table 6. Ongoing Permanent Housing Projects
Table 7. Cost of a House and Lot Package
Table 8A. Permanent Housing Budget Requirement for 2014-2016 18
Table 8B. Community Facilities Budget Requirement for 2014-2016 18
Table 9. Comprehensive Results Framework for Resettlement Programs and Projects

Figure 1: Local Inter-Agency Committee Structure .................................................................................

2
I. Goal

The goal of the Resettlement Cluster is to develop safe and sustainable new housing units and
communities where affected families living in hazard-prone and unsafe areas can be relocated.

The Cluster is comprised of the following agencies:

Chair: Housing and Urban and Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC)

Members: Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
Department of Agriculture (DA)
Department of Education (DepEd)
Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG)
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
Department of Health (DOH)
Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)
Department of Science and Technology (DOST)
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD)
Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB)
National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC)
National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP)
National Housing Authority (NHA)
Office of Civil Defense (OCD)
Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP)

II. Objectives

Specifically, the Resettlement Cluster aims to:

 Identify and acquire safe and suitable sites for development as resettlement sites, taking
into consideration disaster risks and geo-hazard areas, the housing requirements of hard-hit
cities and municipalities and other housing programs and services of the government and
the private sector;

 Construct permanent housing units in the identified resettlement sites with land
development and basic services in partnership with the local governments and the private
sector;

 Facilitate beneficiary prioritization and selection, social preparation activities and conduct
of capacity building programs (e.g., livelihood skills training, community development) for
target beneficiaries in coordination with the concerned local government units, the
Livelihood Cluster and private sector organizations;

 Identify community facilities requirements and coordinate provision of such as well as

other infrastructure support requirements with the local government units, the
Infrastructure Cluster and the private sector; and

 Relocate affected families living in unsafe zones to the new housing sites.

3
III. Permanent Housing Need and Targets

A. Housing Need. Based on the latest report from the Office of Civil Defense (OCD),
there are 1,035,242 totally and partially damaged houses resulting from the onslaught
of Typhoon Yolanda. Of this number, initial assessment indicates that there are
205,128 families living in unsafe zones in the cities and municipalities along the 50-
kilometer typhoon path that need to be relocated (Table 1).

This data, however, will be validated on the ground during project implementation.
Based on the results of ground validation, the resettlement requirements of each
city/municipality may change, which would require corresponding adjustments in
resources and timetables.

Table 1. Permanent Housing Need and Budget Requirements

REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE

No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

GRAND
117 TOTAL 205,128 59,829,680,000 24,981 180,147
5 REGION IV-B
8,760 2,561,850,000 391 8,369
5 Palawan
8,760 2,561,850,000 391 8,369
1 Busuanga
618 181,010,000 - 618
2 Coron
4,500 1,318,050,000 - 4,500
3 Culion
2,164 629,890,000 391 2,164
4 Agutaya 200 580,580,000
5 Linapacan
1,278 374,330,000 - 1,278
1 REGION V 102 290,880,000 0 102
1 Masbate 102 290,880,000 - 102
1 Balud 102 290,880,000
51 REGION VI
117,203 34,183,940,000 14,338 117,203
11 Aklan
15,948 4,668,640,000 250 15,948
1 Altavas
393 115,110,000 393
2 Buruanga
474 138,830,000 - 474
3 Batan
1,305 381,220,000 100 1,305
4 Ibajay
533 156,120,000 - 533

4
 REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE
No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

5 Kalibo
1,589 465,420,000 - 1,589
6 Makato
802 234,910,000 - 802
7 Malay
402 116,230,000 150 402
8 Nabas
1,068 312,820,000 - 1,068
9 New Washington
8,398 2,459,770,000 - 8,398
10 Numancia
354 103,690,000 - 354
11 Tangalan
630 184,530,000 - 630
12 Antique 18,177 5,296,780,000 2,699 18,177
1 Barbaza
2,025 592,110,000 100 2,025
2 Bugasong
2,603 758,470,000 391 2,603
3 Caluya - 828,614,100 -
4 Culasi
1,974 572,430,000 570 1,974
5 Laua-an
3,500 1,018,480,000 660 3,500
6 Libertad
854 245,890,000 420 854
7 Pandan
3,497 1,024,270,000 - 3,497
8 Patnongon
1,600 465,950,0 00 266 1,600
9 San Remigio 45 13,180,000 45
10 Sebaste
460 134,730,000 - 460
11 Tibiao
609 175,430,000 292 609
12 Valderama 1,010 295,830,000 - 1,010
9 Capiz
12,036 3,504,480,000 2,066 12,036
1 Ivisan
672 195,820,000 100 672
2 Jamindan
535 156,700,000 535
3 Panay
1,600 468,640,000 - 1,600
4 Panitan
572 164,810,000 270 572

5
 REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE
No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

5 Pilar
1,488 435,840,000 1,488
6 Pontevedra
1,168 342,110,000 1,168
7 Pres. Roxas
866 253,650,000 866
8 Roxas City
4,408 1,277,000,000 1,396 4,408
9 Sapi-an
727 219,910,000 300 727
12 Iloilo
43,987 12,850,370,400 3,309 43,987
1 Ajuy 5,956
1,734,630,000 978 5,956
2 Anilao
364 106,62,000 - 364
3 Balasan
139 40,710,000 - 139
4 Banate
2,699 790,54 ,000 - 2,699
5 Barotac Nuevo
275 80,550,000 - 275
6 Barotac Viejo
1,980 579,940,000 - 1,980
7 Batad
1,608 469,470,000 150 1,608
8 Carles
9,638 2,815,090,000 780 9,638
9 Concepcion
4,336 1,264,480,000 548 4,336
10 Dumangas
7,406 2,163,710,000 545 7,406
11 Estancia
5,833 1,700,370,000 308 5,833
12 San Dionisio
3,753 1,099,250,000 - 3,753
Negros
7
Occidental 27,055 7,863,670,000 6,014 27,055
1 Cadiz City
8,742 2,533,720,000 2,655 8,742
2 Escalante City
2,018 591,070,000 - 2,018
3 Manapla
2,973 868,160,000 - 2,973
4 Sagay City
7,850 2,290,390,000 879 7,850
5 Silay City
1,992 563,960,000 1,930 1,992

6
 REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE
No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

6 E.B. Magalona
1,168 339,080,000 300 1,168
7 Victorias City
2,312 667,300,000 250 2,312
16 REGION VII
22,423 6,551,000,000 1,603 20,820
16 Cebu
22,423 6,551,000,000 1,603 20,820
1 Bantayan 3,520
128,990,000 200 3,320
2 Bogo City 1,500
439,350,000 - 1,500
3 Borbon 400
115,,950,000 120 280
4 Daanbantayan 4,363
1,275,110 ,000 278 4,085
5 Madridejos 3,693
1,810,680,000 - 3,693
6 Medellin 1,200
351,480,000 - 1,200
7 Pilar 660
193,310,000 - 660
8 Poro 275
80,550,000 - 275
9 San Francisco 1,960
574,080,000 - 1,960
10 San Remegio
1,224 354,560,000 391 833
11 Santa Fe 2,305
671,160,000 394 1,911
12 Sogod 491
143,810,000 - 491
13 Tabogon
184 530,890,000 - 184
14 Tabuelan
220 62,220,000 220 220
15 Tuburan
170 49,790,000 - 170
16 Tudela 258
75,570,000 - 258
43 REGION VIII
56,140 16,356,050,000 8,413 56,140
20 Leyte
30,632 8,926,590,000 4,507 4,507
1 Babatngon 1,774
519,600,000 - 1,774
2 Barauen 187
540,770, 000 187

7
 REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE
No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

3 Baybay City
356 100,680,000 356 356
4 Carigara
3,524 1,320,180,000 - 3,524
5 Isabel
1,912 558,000,000 200 1,712
6 Inopacan 133
38,960,000 133
7 Julita
150 43,940,000 150
8 Macarthur
112 32,800,000 112
9 Matag-ob
300 87,870,000 300
10 Mayorga
283 82,890,000 283
11 Ormoc City 1,419
413,200,000 240 1,179
12 Palo 1,244
358,100,000 621 623
13 Palompon
984 288,210,000 - 984
14 Pastrana
960 281,180,000 960
15 San Isidro 744
217,920,000 - 744
16 San Miguel 117 33,090,000 -
17 Tabango 200
58,580,000 200
18 Tacloban City 14,433
4,207,880,000 1,935 12,498
19 Tanauan 1,200
343,520,000 788 412
20 Tolosa
600 173,220,000 250 350
12 Eastern Samar 7,573 2,205,190,200 1,281 6,292
1 Balangiga 460 134,730,000 - 460
2 Balangkayan 549
160,800,000 549
General
3 300
McArthur 84,840,000 300 -
4 Giporlos 743 217,620,000 743
5 Guiuan 1,200
347,630,000 381 819
6 Hernani 989
283,620,000 600 389

8
 REGION / NO. OF NO. OF BALANCE
No. of PROVINCE/ FAMILIES BUDGETARY UNITS TO BE NET OF
LGUs CITY/ IN UNSAFE REQUIREMENT GENERATED LGU
MUNICIPALITY ZONES (LGU LAND) LAND

7 Lawaan 949 277,960,000 949

8 Llorente 383
112,180,000 - 383
9 Maydolong 164
48,040,000 164
10 Mercedes 139 40,710,000 139
11 Quinapondan 810 237,250,000 810
12 Salcedo 887 259,800,000 887
4 Samar 8,900 2,585,480,000 2,112 6,788
1 Basey
6,609 1,926,660,000 903 5,706
2 Marabut
1,458 417,670,000 929 529
3 Sta. Rita
280 79,018,000 280 -
4 Villareal
553 161,970,000 553
1 Southern Leyte
130 36,076,000 130 -
1 Silago 130 36,076,000 130 -
6 Biliran 8,905 2,602,020,000 619 8,286
1 Almeria
929 272,100,000 929
2 Biliran
2,852 830,610,000 469 2,383
3 Cabucgayan
631 183,300,000 150 481
4 Caibiran
1,511 442,570,000 1,511
5 Culaba
823 241,060,000 823
6 Naval
2,159 632,370,000 2,159
1 CARAGA 500 146,450,000
1 Dinagat Islands 500 146,450,000
1 Loreto 146,450,000

B. Targets. Based on the identified need, NHA, which is the implementing arm of the
Cluster, targets the construction of the resettlement projects as follows:

9
 Table 2. Resettlement Targets
Year Starts Completion
2014 120,000 20,000
2015 85,128 100,000
2016 0 85,128
Total 205,128 205,128

IV. Programs, Projects and Activities

A. Land Identification, Acquisition and Development. The NHA coordinates with the
concerned local government units in the identification of land for resettlement. The
priority for use as resettlement sites are LGU-owned and titled properties and
government-owned lands. DENR has identified around 4,000 hectares of public land in
the fourteen (14) affected provinces which can be proclaimed for housing purposes.
NHA, together with the LGU concerned, are currently evaluating the feasibility of the
development of these areas for housing and resettlement purposes. Out of the list of
sites submitted by the DENR to the Cluster, NHA has identified about 80 hectares that
can be used for resettlement.

In areas where there are no LGU or government-owned land available suitable for
housing, NHA coordinates with the LGU for identification of privately owned lands
that can be acquired for resettlement use.

Once a resettlement site is identified, NHA secures clearance from the DENR Mines
and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and the DOST that the site is not prone to geohazards
or the geohazards can be addressed by engineering interventions.

Land development involves the subdivision of the site into individual lots and the
construction of roads and drainage systems. At least 30% of the site is allocated for
open spaces, including community facilities.

B. Housing Construction. The NHA’s 40-sq.m lot size and 22-sq.m. area Loftable
Rowhouse (with PVC Gutter) shall be adopted as the standard house and lot model for
Permanent Housing for Typhoon Yolanda affected families. The disaster resilient
housing structural design standards, as recommended by DPWH, are as follows:

Table 3. Resilient Housing Structural Design Standards

Design Parameters Loftable Rowhouse

Wind Load 250 KPH

Strength of Wall and Superstructure 3,000 PSI
Soil Bearing Capacity 95 KPA
Seismic Load Zone 4
Loadings 50 PSF
Fire Resistance 2 Hours
Storm window shutters

10
 Inclined roof beams with embedded purlins

Increase in size of reinforcing steel bars, beam

width and column width
Change of roofing screws from Tekscrew to J-Bolt

The general features and architectural specifications of the housing units based on the
above design standards are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Features of Standard Typhoon Resilient Rowhouse with Loft

COST Php 195,000

33 sqm.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
(22 sqm. G/F AREA and 11 sqm. LOFT)
COST PER SQ. M. Php 6,658.29
ARCHITECTURAL
Loft, Glass Jalousie Windows on Aluminum
Architectural Features
Frame, Wooden Typhoon Shutters
G/F Floor to Loft
2.60 meters
Floor Finish Height
PVC Gutter (20mmx 15mm) and Downspout
Gutter

Height of Firewall 5.80 meters

Roof Thickness 0.40 millimetres thick Corrugated GI Sheet
Roof Purlins 2.0 x 150 x 65 mm
STRUCTURAL
250 x 175 mm, with
Column Size
4-16 mm ø reinforcing bar
B-1 and B-3:
300 x 175 mm and
Beam Size
B-2: 250 x 175 mm, with
4-16 mm ø reinforcing bar
Footing Size 800 x 800 mm
Wall Footing Size 400 mm
ELECTRICAL
Number of Lighting
4
Outlets
Number of Convenience
4
Outlets
Number of Switches 2
2-5.5 mm² ø THHN +
Service Entrance 1-5.5 mm² ø THHN (G) in 20 mm ø RSC
CONDUIT

11
C. Construction of Community Facilities. In the construction of resettlement projects
in sites which are far from existing facilities such as schools, NHA will include in the
project the construction of community facilities, including school buildings. NHA
proposes a three-storey school building design with estimated cost of P25 Million each.
However, the cost of the school building may vary upon DPWH’s release of its
approved design for a disaster-resilient two-storey school building.

The NHA will also construct, in coordination with the DPWH, multi-purpose covered
courts (MPCC), which will also serve as Day Care centers and health centers in the
resettlement sites. The proposed MPCC costs P12 Million each.

The target number of school buildings and community facilities that will be built per
year will depend on the location, size and proximity to existing facilities of the
resettlement sites that will be identified and constructed per year. Depending on the
number of relocatees and estimated school children, NHA will build a three (3) storey,
15-classroom school building at 50 students per classroom (2 shifts). For community
facilities, NHA will build one (1) multipurpose court for every 1,000 families.

Table 5A. Total Number of Community Facilities to be Built

NO. OF UNITS
FACILITIES
TO BE PROVIDED
Multi-purpose Covered Court (1 unit for every 500
families) 202
Classrooms (2 students for every family; 50 students
per classroom; 2 shifts) 537

Table 5B. Indicative Community Facilities per Province/City

MULTI-PURPOSE
Region/ NO. OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS
COVERED COURT (MPCC)
Province/ No. of FAMILIES TOTAL COST
City/ LGUs UNSAFE Cost @ (Php Million)
No. of No. of Cost @
Municipality ZONES Php25M/
Bldgs. MPCC Php12M/Bldg.
Bldg.
GRAND
TOTAL 116 205,128 537 13,425.00 202 2,424 15,849.00
REGION IV-B 5 8,760 24 600.00 9 108.00 708.00
Palawan 5 8,760 24 600.00 9 108.00 708.00
Busuanga 1 618 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Coron 2 4,500 12 300.00 5 60.00 360.00
Culion 3 2,164 6 150.00 2 24.00 174.00
Agutaya 4 200 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Linapacan 5 1,278 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
REGION V 1 102 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Masbate 1 102 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Balud 1 102 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00

12
 MULTI-PURPOSE
Region/ NO. OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS
COVERED COURT (MPCC)
Province/ No. of FAMILIES TOTAL COST
City/ LGUs UNSAFE Cost @ (Php Million)
No. of No. of Cost @
Municipality ZONES Php25M/
Bldgs. MPCC Php12M/Bldg.
Bldg.
REGION VI 50 117,203 305 7,625.00 116 1,392.00 9,017.00
Aklan 11 15,948 41 1,025.00 15 180.00 1,205.00
Altavas 1 393 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Buruanga 2 474 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Batan 3 1,305 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Ibajay 4 533 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
Kalibo 5 1,589 4 100.00 2 24.00 124.00
Makato 6 802 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Malay 7 402 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Nabas 8 1,068 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
New
Washington 9 8,398 22 550.00 8 96.00 646.00
Numancia 10 354 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Tangalan 11 630 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Antique 11 18,177 43 1,075.00 17 204.00 1,279
Barbaza 1 2,025 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Bugasong 2 2,603 7 175.00 3 36.00 211.00
Culasi 3 1,974 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Laua-an 4 3,500 9 225.00 4 48.00 273.00
Libertad 5 854 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Pandan 6 3,497 9 225.00 3 36.00 261.00
Patnongon 7 1,600 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
San Remigio 8 45 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Sebaste 9 460 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Tibiao 10 609 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Valderrama 11 1,010 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Capiz 9 12,036 32 800.00 13 156.00 956.00
Ivisan 1 672 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Jamindan 7 535 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
Panay 3 1,600 4 100.00 2 24.00 124.00
Panitan 4 572 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Pilar 5 1,488 4 100.00 1 12.00 112.00
Pontevedra 6 1,168 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Pres. Roxas 7 866 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Roxas City 8 4,408 12 300.00 4 48.00 348.00
Sapi-an 9 727 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00

13
 MULTI-PURPOSE
Region/ NO. OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS
COVERED COURT (MPCC)
Province/ No. of FAMILIES TOTAL COST
City/ LGUs UNSAFE Cost @ (Php Million)
No. of No. of Cost @
Municipality ZONES Php25M/
Bldgs. MPCC Php12M/Bldg.
Bldg.
Iloilo 12 43,987 118 2,950.00 44 528.00 3,478.00
Anilao 2 364 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Balasan 3 139 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Banate 4 2,699 7 175.00 3 36.00 211.00
Barotac
Nuevo 5 275 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Barotac Viejo 6 1,980 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Batad 7 1,608 4 100.00 2 24.00 124.00
Carles 8 9,638 26 650.00 10 120.00 770.00
Concepcion 9 4,336 12 300.00 4 48.00 348.00
Dumangas 10 7,406 20 500.00 7 84.00 584.00
Estancia 11 5,833 16 400.00 6 72.00 472.00
San Dionisio 12 3,753 10 250.00 4 48.00 298.00
Negros Occ. 7 27,055 71 1,775.00 27 324.00 2,099.00
Cadiz City 1 8,742 23 575.00 9 108.00 683.00
Escalante City 2 2,018 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Manapla 3 2,964 8 200.00 3 36.00 236.00
Sagay City 4 7,850 21 525.00 8 96.00 621.00
Silay City 5 1,992 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
E.B. Magalona 6 1,168 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Victorias City 7 2,321 6 150.00 2 24.00 174.00
REGION VII 16 22,423 59 1,475.00 21 252.00 1,727.00
Cebu 16 22,423 59 1,475.00 21 252.00 1,727.00
Bantayan 1 3,520 9 225.00 4 48.00 273.00
Bogo City 2 1,500 4 100.00 2 24.00 124.00
Borbon 3 400 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Daanbantayan 4 4,363 12 300.00 4 48.00 348.00
Madridejos 5 3,693 10 250.00 4 48.00 298.00
Medellin 6 1,200 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Pilar 7 660 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Poro 8 275 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
San Francisco 9 1960 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
San Remegio 10 1,224 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Santa Fe 11 2,305 6 150.00 2 24.00 174.00
Sogod 12 491 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Tabogon 13 184 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Tabuelan 14 220 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Tuburan 15 170 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00

14
 MULTI-PURPOSE
Region/ NO. OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS
COVERED COURT (MPCC)
Province/ No. of FAMILIES TOTAL COST
City/ LGUs UNSAFE Cost @ (Php Million)
No. of No. of Cost @
Municipality ZONES Php25M/
Bldgs. MPCC Php12M/Bldg.
Bldg.
Tudela 16 258 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
REGION VIII 43 56,140 148 3,700.00 55 660.00 4,360.00
Leyte 20 30,632 81 2,025.00 29 348.00 2,373.00
Babatngon 1 1,774 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Barauen 2 187 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Baybay City 3 356 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Carigara 4 3,524 9 225.00 4 48.00 273.00
Isabel 5 1,912 5 125.00 2 24.00 149.00
Inopacan 6 133 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Julita 7 150 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Macarthur 8 112 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Matag-ob 9 300 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Mayorga 10 283 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Ormoc City 11 1,419 4 100.00 1 12.00 112.00
Palo 12 1,244 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Palompon 13 984 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Pastrana 14 960 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
San Isidro 15 744 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
San Miguel 16 117 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Tabango 17 200 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Tacloban City 18 14,433 38 950.00 14 168.00 1118.00
Tanauan 19 1,200 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Tolosa 20 600 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Eastern
Samar 12 7,573 19 475.00 7 84.00 559.00
Balangkayan 1 549 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
General
McArthur 2 300 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Guiuan 3 1,200 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Hernani 4 989 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Llorente 5 383 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Maydolong 6 164 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Balangiga 7 460 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Giporlos 8 743 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Lawaan 9 949 3 75.00 1 12.00 87.00
Mercedes 10 139 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Quinapondan 11 810 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Salcedo 12 887 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00

15
 MULTI-PURPOSE
Region/ NO. OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS
COVERED COURT (MPCC)
Province/ No. of FAMILIES TOTAL COST
City/ LGUs UNSAFE Cost @ (Php Million)
No. of No. of Cost @
Municipality ZONES Php25M/
Bldgs. MPCC Php12M/Bldg.
Bldg.
Samar 4 8,900 24 600.00 9 108.00 708.00
Basey 1 6,609 18 450.00 7 84.00 534.00
Marabut 2 1,458 4 100.00 1 12.00 112.00
Sta. Rita 3 280 1 25.00 0 0.00 25.00
Villareal 4 553 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
Southern
Leyte 1 130 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Silago 1 130 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Biliran 6 8,905 24 600.00 10 120.00 720.00
Almeria 1 929 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Biliran 2 2,852 8 200.00 3 36.00 236.00
Cabucgayan 3 631 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Caibiran 4 1,511 4 100.00 2 24.00 124.00
Culaba 5 823 2 50.00 1 12.00 62.00
Naval 6 2,159 6 150.00 2 24.00 174.00
REG.XIII
(CARAGA) 1 500 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
Dinagat
Island 1 500 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00
Loreto 1 500 1 25.00 1 12.00 37.00

D. Social Preparation. The resettlement program aims to establish sustainable new

communities. In line with this, the focus is not just on constructing strong and resilient
physical structures within the resettlement site, but more importantly, on the people
themselves who are the center of the resettlement program.

Social preparation is important to assess the socioeconomic status of the target

beneficiaries, identify their strengths and limitations, and design appropriate capacity
building and livelihood programs to appropriately respond to the needs of the
community who were displaced or will be displaced from their usual places of
residence.

It is important that resettlement programs are implemented cognizant of the negative

social and economic effects of dislocation. Some of these effects may include;
- Loss of existing social network/ support system
- Distance from city/town services and amenities (hospitals, drugstores, public
market)
- Lack of access or distance from usual employment or livelihood opportunities
- Challenges of new neighborhood and environment (peace & order)

16
 Social preparation process aims at improving the capacity of the people to adapt to their
new environment once they are resettled.

In view of the magnitude of the Yolanda affected families that will require social
preparation prior to resettlement, there may be a need for NHA to engage the assistance
of other agencies, as well as international and local non-government organizations to
assist in the social preparation process.

E. Provision for Livelihood. The sustainability of the resettlement project hinges on the
availability of and access to livelihood opportunities of the project beneficiaries. The
absence of livelihood opportunities in the resettlement site will compel people to return
to their former places of residence despite their declaration as unsafe and will defeat
the purpose of the resettlement program.

The presence of both skilled and unskilled workers within the vicinity of a resettled
community is an essential factor for a resettlement community to thrive.
Socioeconomic diversity will provide opportunities for livelihoods. With proper
planning, coordination and linkages with other livelihood programs of both national
and local government agencies, the implementation of the resettlement projects can
propel a range of livelihood opportunities from housing construction, cottage industries
or other small-sized entrepreneurial activities.

In line with this, the Cluster shall coordinate with the Livelihood Cluster in the
provision of the necessary assistance to provide beneficiaries livelihood opportunities.
The NHA shall likewise provide the following types of assistance:

 Skills Training: Implementation of relevant skills training programs to introduce or

upgrade the skills of the labor force in order to meet the manpower requirements
set by communal and industrial establishments in the area.

 Capital/Credit Assistance: Coordination with financing institutions for possible

funding assistance to relocatees who want to put up businesses and to those with
existing businesses that require additional capital. The NHA can assist beneficiaries
in the preparation of their business plans if required by financing institutions.
Establishment of credit information facility at the barangay or LGU level for
increased access to credit or livelihood financing may also be undertaken.

 Job Referral and Placement: Linkage/tie up with the Public Employment Service
Office-Department of Labor and Employment (PESO-DOLE) to assess the
available manpower requirement of companies to match with the existing skills
acquired or possessed by relocatees/NHA beneficiaries based on the results of skills
registration and TESDA skills assessment.

 Entrepreneurship Development Program: The target beneficiaries are provided with

assistance packages to enhance their capabilities and potentials, so they can become
successful entrepreneurs for increased opportunities and generation of employment
and income.

17
  Vegetable Seeds Distribution/Urban Gardening: Project beneficiaries are
encouraged to utilize a portion of their lots for backyard gardening and other agri-
based related activities.

 Cooperative Development: Organization and development of transport, market,

water service, credit, consumer and producer, and other service cooperatives is
coordinated with concerned Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) offices
and LGUs to address the immediate needs of project beneficiaries.

F. Estate Management and Community Development. To ensure the sustainability of

the newly resettled community, NHA will assist the LGU and the community
themselves in the transition process by building the capacity of the community
especially on self-governance. NHA, together with the LIAC subcommittee members,
shall facilitate the organization of homeowners associations (HOAs) and capacitate the
community leaders in development activities. Continuing skills enhancement and
livelihood programs will be implemented in coordination with the Livelihood Cluster
to help the community acclimatize in their new environment.

V. Implementation Issues

The Cluster is addressing issues that affect reconstruction efforts of the Resettlement Cluster.
In particular, these issues involve the following:

 Land Availability. Many of the LGUs affected by Yolanda do not own lands or have
available lands but do not have titles (only tax declaration) over the properties they have
allocated for resettlement. Moreover, there are several municipalities where almost the
entire land area is prone to geo-hazards, which makes it difficult to identify suitable
land for resettlement. The Cluster will pursue coordination with DENR in the
identification of government land, facilitate the titling of the LGU identified sites in
coordination with the DENR and the LRA, and work with the LGU in the identification
of private land that can be acquired for this purpose.

 Availability of Construction Materials. The manufacturers of construction supply

materials have raised issues on logistics (e.g., berthing at port areas), timely shipment
and pricing of imported raw materials and limited sources of aggregates in some areas.
The Cluster will continue to coordinate with PPA (re berthing), DOF (re imported
materials) and other concerned agencies/offices to address the bottlenecks in the supply
of construction materials.

 Timetable for the Issuance of Permits, Clearances and Licenses for Housing and
Resettlement. An Administrative Order is being drafted to fast-track the process of
issuing permits, certifications, clearances and licenses for housing projects in Yolanda-
affected areas, directing all government agencies to observe the same and impose
sanctions for non-compliance. The procedures for the proposed One Stop Shop are
being discussed and will include designation of agency representatives with authority
to facilitate the issuance of clearances and permits.

18
VI. Accomplishments

As of 15 July 2014, there are six (6) ongoing housing projects that would generate a total of
2,721 units. Of this number, 285 have been completed.

Table 6. On-going Permanent Housing Projects (As of 15 July 2014)

Project/Location Units Units

Started Completed
Region VIII 1,530 285
1. Kapuso Village (Kawayan Ville Ph. 1), 347 153
Tacloban City, Leyte (GMA)
2. Kawayan Village Ph. 2, Tacloban City, Leyte 190 5
(Habitat)
3. Prime Town Ph. 1, Bgy. Pago, Tanauan, Leyte 822 127
(GK)
4. Kapuso Village-Palo, San Jose, Palo, Leyte 171
(GMA)
Region VI 1,191
1. Roxas City, Capiz 896
2. Dumangas, Iloilo 295
TOTAL 2,721 285

In addition, sixteen (16) resettlement projects have either been packaged or are being packaged
for bidding. These projects include a land area of approximately 35.03 hectares, which will
generate approximately 4,753 housing units.

Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) have also been signed by the NHA with Habitat for
Humanity (HH) and Gawad Kalinga (GK) which will generate approximately 5,135 housing
units in identified resettlement project sites.

VII. Budgetary Estimates for Resettlement Projects

For budgeting purposes, two assumptions are considered:

 LGU or Government owned land is available for resettlement purposes; or

 No government land is available necessitating the acquisition of private land.

19
 Table 7. Cost of a House and Lot Package

LGU/GOV’T. –
ITEM FOR ACQUISITION
OWNED LAND

LAND DEVELOPMENT PHP 85,000.00 PHP 85,000.00

HOUSE CONSTRUCTION PHP 195,000.00 PHP 195,000.00

LAND ACQUISITION
PHP 10,000.00
(for privately owned land)

TOTAL PHP 280,000.00 PHP 290,000.00

ADMIN. COST
PHP 2,800.00 PhP 2,900.00
(1% of Project Cost)

GRAND TOTAL PHP 282,800.00 PHP 292,900.00

Budgetary Requirement. Considering the planned delivery schedule presented in Table 2,

the budget requirement for the resettlement program is as follows:

Table 8A. Budget Requirement for 2014-2016

No. of Housing Units 2014 2015 – 2016 Total Cost

(PhpM) (PhpM) (PhpM)
24,981 housing units to 6,994.68 6,994.68
be built on gov’t./ LGU (@ Php280,000
land per unit)

2. 180,147 housing units to 27,555.51 24,687.12 52,242.63

be built on private lands (@Php290,000
(for acquisition) per unit)

TOTAL 34,588.68 24,185.42 Php59,237.31

Admin. Cost (1%) 592.37
GRAND TOTAL 59,829.68

20
 Table 8B. Budget Requirement for 2014-2016

Community Facilities 2014 2015 – 2016 Total Cost

(PhpM) (PhpM) (PhpM)
School Buildings 7,500.00 5,925.00 13,425.00
(@P25M per building) (for 300 Units) (for 237 Units)

3. Multi-purpose Covered 1,200.00 1,224.00 2,424.00

Court (for 100 Units) (for 102 Units)
4. (@P12M per building)

TOTAL 8,700.00 7,149.00 15,849.00

Mode of Procurement per RA 9184. Under GPPB Resolution 34-2013, which was approved
on November 14, 2013, agencies directly involved in post-Yolanda rescue, relief, and
rehabilitation operations, including those under the Resettlement Cluster, may now procure
goods and services through Negotiated Procurement rather than by Competitive Procurement.
This includes bidding for land development and construction of units under the Permanent
Housing Program for affected families.

Negotiated Procurement, under Section 53 of R.A. 9184, is allowed “In case of imminent
danger to life or property during a state of calamity, or when time is of the essence arising from
natural or man-made calamities or other causes where immediate action is necessary to prevent
damage to or loss of life or property, or to restore vital public services, infrastructure facilities
and other public utilities”.

VIII. Implementation Structure

A. NHA Project Implementation Teams. Cognizant of the urgency to provide

permanent housing units outside the unsafe areas, and to strengthen the existing
workforce in the typhoon-stricken areas, the NHA created Project Implementation
Teams (NPIT) to undertake the development and implementation of resettlement
projects intended for the families rendered homeless by Typhoon Yolanda. The NPIT
is composed of an Over-all Head and three Teams assigned to different affected regions
to supervise the implementation of contract works for land development and
construction of housing units in the selected resettlement areas.

B. Local Inter-agency Committees (LIACs). To ensure participatory approach in

resettlement project implementation, HUDCC/ NHA initiates the establishment of the
Local Inter-agency Committee (LIAC) at the city/municipal level. The Local Chief
Executive issues an Executive Order creating the LIAC, designating members and
identifying the roles of the member-agencies. The LIAC serves as the policy making
and coordinating body to ensure harmonized and efficient implementation of the
various programs and activities related to the development of resettlement projects and

21
relocation of affected families. The LIAC also oversees the overall project
implementation, particularly the selection and prioritization of families for relocation.

At the City or Municipality level, the LIAC is chaired by the Local Chief Executive
and co-chaired by HUDCC/NHA. Members of the LIAC include representatives from
DSWD, DENR, and DPWH. Other national agencies may be called upon by the LIAC
as necessary.

At the local government level, the concerned Department Heads such as the Municipal
Planning and Development Office (MPDO), Municipal Social Welfare and
Development Office (MSWDO), Municipal Engineering Office and Municipal
Assessors Office, are members of the sub-committees created under the LIAC.

LIAC Subcommittees and Functions

Depending on the need and magnitude of the resettlement program, subcommittees may
be created under the LIAC with the following functions:

1. Beneficiary Selection Arbitration and Awards Subcommittee. The subcommittee

is chaired by the Municipal Social Welfare Department and includes representatives
from DSWD, NHA, Presidential Commission for Urban Poor, OCD and other
recognized NGOs. The selection and prioritization of beneficiaries of Yolanda
resettlement projects will be aligned with the provisions of the Urban Development
Housing Act of 1992 (RA 7279).

Tasks:
 Housing survey
 Validation of list of affected families
 Formulation of Code of Policies
 Resolution of requests for inclusion and other claims
 Pre-qualification of households based on NHA’s Apha listing
 Recommendation of the final list of qualified beneficiaries

The Code of Policies outlines the guidelines in the identification and validation of
families qualified to be awarded housing units under the program, the procedures
for request for inclusion for those families not in the masterlist of beneficiaries or
possible delisting of those found to be unqualified based on the guidelines (e.g.,
beneficiary of other housing programs), and process for the award of housing units
to qualified beneficiaries.

2. Site Selection and Project Implementation Subcommittee. The subcommittee is

chaired by the Municipal Planning Development Office and co-chaired by NHA,
with representatives from the DENR, DPWH, Municipal Assessor and Municipal
Engineer’s Offices as members.

Tasks:
 Site selection and identification
 Site acquisition
 Securing of clearances
 Provision of basic services and facilities

22
  Monitoring of project construction

3. Relocation Subcommittee. The subcommittee is chaired by the Municipal

Engineering Office or the MSWDO, with representatives from NHA, DSWD,
PCUP, PNP and other partner NGOs as members.

Tasks:
 Information dissemination/issuance of Transfer Notices
 Community assemblies
 Workplan, budget & logistics for the transfer/transport of families to the
resettlement site

4. Estate Management and Community Development Subcommittee. The

subcommittee is chaired by the MSWDO with representatives from the Municipal
Engineering Office, DSWD and NHA as members.

Tasks:
 Community organization
 Implementation of livelihood programs
 Coordination of various concerns of relocatees
 Collection of monthly amortizations

Figure 1: Local Inter-Agency Committee Structure

23
 IX. Monitoring, Review and Evaluation

Monitoring and Reporting arrangements will continue in compliance with the DBM
requirements mandated for Performance Informed Budgeting. Quarterly monitoring reports
on the physical and financial accomplishments of the Permanent Housing Program, including
status of land development and construction of housing units, shall be submitted to the DBM
and OPARR.

Table 9. Comprehensive Results Framework for Resettlement Programs and Projects

Data
Performance Targets Short- Medium- Sources and Assumptions and
Result Baseline
and Indicators term term Reporting Risks
Mechanism

Recovery Objectives
To relocate affected families
living in hazard prone areas to
safe areas and to develop
sustainable and disaster
resilient settlements

Impact (long-term)

Sustainable, resilient No. of resettlement NHA Assumptions

communities resettled in areas established External growth
serviced resettlement areas and sustained. environment
with opportunities for remains positive
Community NEDA
livelihoods and potential for
sustainable growth, that are economic indicators
able to withstand and achieve regional PDP
targets Risks Visayas
recover from disasters faster OCD
subjected to impact
and better
No. of fatalities due of other natural
to natural disasters disasters
below regional levels

Outcome (medium-term)

All households identified for Assumptions

resettlement relocated into Adequate and
safe areas and appropriately suitable
accommodated. resettlement sites
can be identified
and made available

Housing and resettlement. DSWD, Assumptions

NHA Adequate land
Yolanda-affected families Percent of families made available and
located in designated no- from no-build zones financing provided
build zones resettled to safer resettled

24
 Data
Performance Targets Short- Medium- Sources and Assumptions and
Result Baseline
and Indicators term term Reporting Risks
Mechanism

areas in disaster resilient DSWD, Risks Housing

housing. NHA, DOST stock not adequate
to withstand
possible future
disasters

Social services. Relocated School enrolment DepED Assumptions

communities are able to numbers as a Continuous
access education, health, and percentage of school progress towards
social protection services aged children attaining national
PDP targets for
No. of patients education, health,
DOH
seeking treatment and social
treated in health protection
facilities

No. of interventions
to service vulnerable DSWD
individuals.

Physical infrastructure. Infrastructure needed DPWH Assumptions

Infrastructure facilities for access, including Continuous
required to ensure relocated roads, bridges and DPWH progress towards
communities have access to drainage is attaining national
DOTC
services and markets are constructed PDP targets for
reconstructed or rehabilitated according to PPA sustained
according to improved improved disaster development
disaster resilient standards. resilient standards DOE

Basic utilities and services are LWUA

available to households in the
resettlement areas. DILG

Outputs OPARR Assumptions

Materials and
Housing and resettlement No. of resettlement DSWD finance available to
areas established surveys and homeowners to
Establish resettlement areas reports establish homes
and relocate 201,615
households over three years
No. of resettlement
Resettlement communities housing units Risks Further
established and sustainable constructed typhoons set back
OPARR
reconstruction
DPWH efforts
progress
reports

25
 Data
Performance Targets Short- Medium- Sources and Assumptions and
Result Baseline
and Indicators term term Reporting Risks
Mechanism

Livelihoods and local OPARR Assumptions

economic development Supply chains for
DA, DAR, key products are
Livelihood projects and BFAR, BAI, available
programs implemented to No. of target and DENR
generate productive activities population in progress
for resettled communities. productive work reports
Risks Investments
MSMEs established and No. of businesses DTI, LGUs do not promote
actively trading registered inclusive growth

Social services Assumptions

Government
Education facilities in DepEd standards for OPARR agencies are able
resettlement areas built to student to classroom to program and
improved disaster resilient ratio to be applied to DepED
spend available
standards with necessary staff determine where progress
budgetary
and materials classrooms are to be reports
resources
constructed and effectively
Health facilities in equipped to meet the
resettlement areas built to needs of resettled
improved disaster resilient families.
standards with necessary staff OPARR Risks Government
and materials DOH standards for agencies and
population to health DOH private sector
Vulnerable families and care facility ratio to progress service providers
communities served by social be applied to reports and contractors do
protection programs determine where not have sufficient
health facilities are to capacity and
be constructed and resources to plan
equipped to meet the and implement a
needs of the resettled large-scale
population. relocation program

No. of relocated
families enrolled in
key social protection
programs (e.g.,
conditional cash
transfer program,
cash-for-work, …)

Physical infrastructure

Public and private Relevant output OPARR Assumptions

infrastructure in support of indicators for Government
resettlement areas constructed LGUs agencies are able
- roads and bridges to program and
- telecoms DPWH
spend available

26
 Data
Performance Targets Short- Medium- Sources and Assumptions and
Result Baseline
and Indicators term term Reporting Risks
Mechanism

according to improved - electricity DOTC budgetary

disaster resilient standards - water supply resources
- government LWUA
- roads and bridges buildings
- telecoms DILG
- electricity
- water supply
- government buildings

27