114 25 GROUPS

6 Group_Names [A-Z] Member #1 Member #2

5 1 Academic Achievers Rogelio Jr. Dimakiling NOLAN KIRK ESTRELLA
4 1 Assessment Quartet Andrea Dela Paz Retchin Mae Egipto
5 1 Assessors REGINE FERNANDEZ Mary Rose Guan
5 1 Bayanihan Terence Balaoing Jellie Cabas
5 1 BIG5 SHERIDAN YVONNE ALABA Catherine Kaiser
4 1 Darwin's Defenders Agnes Bo Jepanibing Enrique
5 1 Five For Fighting GRACE MOLENO MIKE JERICHO MONJE
4 1 Gems Bond LYKA MARIE SUZANNE ASAYMARY AILEEN DEL FONSO
5 1 KaSiyensya August Anthony Balute John Michael Bayocot
5 1 Lakbay Elaine Bailon Margielyn Batugal
5 1 MABUHAY Reymark Catindoy Reign Gonzales
4 1 Mahinahon Alyssa Micah Esteban Marifel Lapusque
5 1 Masikap Melissa Ann Empig Dexter Gabica
5 1 Mindful Mentors AL ADVINCULA Liezel Bantatua
5 1 Molders Jeun Marianne Alba Jenefer Joy Ferrer
4 1 Motivators Jason Bolima Ilonah Christine Garcia
4 1 New Jeans Jana Clarice Ocampo Daina Marie Quitalig
5 1 OPEN MINDS Jessa Mae Casanoba Ronniel Ena Dizon
5 1 Padayon Joselyn Joy Arciaga Eloisa Bondoc
4 1 Scaffolders Emely Diaz Danilo Hernandez
1 1 SIKHAY MA. JAYANNE MAPUGAY
5 1 Tara Let's Manilene Almendares Desiree Balmes
5 1 Teamwork Jasmin Agtutubo Dorothy Grace Alcantara
5 1 The 5th Power Bernadette Columbres Katrina Dela Fuente
5 1 TheMagic5 Marian Rovilyn Agulto Jonielee Charmaine Bandola
Ω SOLO FLIGHT It's just me.

Note to Students: Request your FIC to initiate the THREAD {"question"} for your group in the Self and Peer Assess
When making a request identify your group. If the request is done in the messaging cabinet
 Member #3 Member #4 Member #5
Michiko Estreller PRINCES LUCAS Isabel Mediavillo
Sean Angela Oaperina Llo Francis Pasco
Jasmine Stephanie Mendiola VICTOR GERALD SALGUET RONALD LEVY SANTOS
SHANNON JOEBELLE MARAAMERAH SULTAN Sunita Venkatesh
Maria Kathrina Manucot Rachel Pahilagmago Germiline Fei San Pedro
Mark Anthony Escabarte Brent Fallarcuna
KIMBERLY MORENO KRISTINA LOU NOBLES Merylle Queral
GEMMA ORDOYO MARK DIZON RITUAL
Jarod Ivan Palla Aryl Cris Pasquin Ave Marinella Sulayao
Jeferson Juan Mhaquel Maureen Mañebo Evangeline Nicolas
MARIA KATRINA SANTIAGO EMMA SURIAGA Samantha Abbygail Tio
Eunice Samson Glory Joy Ting
Jashamier Magarse Lester Piedad Mera Taguchi
Savier Liron Catura Fides Anne San Juan Emil Roi Villanueva
Yuliana Handoyo Darren Lucena Ivy Grace Sarmiento
Mikhaella Javier Filipina Lingat
Bryan Rillorta Danielle Simbajon
DIVINE GRACE HENDERIN Noel Llamar Dessa Marqueses
Lea Salameda NELSA SUVILLAGA Charmaine Torres
Jhea Nica Roxas Yuriko Maikaelle Santos

Maricres Butal CLEO JOHN CASTILLO Veronica Fulleros

LOCEL ALFARO Estelle Kathleen Castelo Acsilyn Miyazaki
Carnalynne Doncillo Clarissa Joy Maribbay ASHLEY-ANN SMITH
Alexander Conde Anna-Marie Esmeralda FATIMA LAGUMBAY

the Self and Peer Assessment SUBMISSION forum if you are unable to post your feedback & upload the form.
e in the messaging cabinet, include the Asst or Exercise# and the Course/Term
 Member #6

ack & upload the form.

 Go to Data Entry Sheet Go to Summative Report
PERFORMANCE RATING
Distinguished; Well-integrated Competent; Proficient
Weight Criteria (1.0-1.25) (1.26-2.0)
30 CONCEPTS: Ideas are well-integrated and Demonstrates good
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration personally synthesized. Rich comprehension & able to
elaboration clearly demonstrates contribute to the clarification of
deep understanding of theory. theoretical concepts. Expresses
ideas in original ways.

30 HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Analysis is systematic, logical, Good practical connections.

Integration; Practical Connections encompassing. Holistic grasp of Recognizes current issues and
relationships to explain events and provides resolutions, which are
situations. Stimulates further good but rather common
applications & explorations, (predictable, expected) rather than
innovations. Offers noteworthy innovative. Analysis is very good
solutions to pertinent issues. but may have a few flaws or may
lack breadth.

20 BEHAVIORS: Significantly keeps the tasks in Usually facilitates motion.

Diligence, initiative, timeliness, motion. Mindful of schedule and Typically prompt and can be relied
cooperation posts on time. Can always be on.
counted on.

20 ARTICULATION: Mostly responsible for organization Good assistance in the

Eloquence; Reader impact; of ideas. Concise without prejudice organization of ideas. Good
Organization of ideas against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and
articulation, grammar and construction. Reader-impact is
construction. Inspiring. Eloquent. good but not exactly stimulating.
Stimulates reflection and further
exploration.
 Elementary Marginal Inadequate
(2.01-2.75) (2.76-3.25) (3.26-4.25)
Superficial processing. Seems to Personal comprehension cannot be Offers personal opinion that lacks
understand key concepts but ascertained due to ambiguity or lack of theoretical basis or is inconsistent
tends to echo (or sound like) text originality (copy-paste). Ideas are mostly with principles. Misconceptions
from learning resources, e.g., as opinion or folk-knowledge rather than strongly evident.
direct responses to questions. anchored on theoretical concepts &
principles. Some misconceptions.

Analysis tends to be narrow and Strongly bound in the context of the Concepts are not integrated into
shallow. Perspectives consider resource material studied. [Fresh] explanations or solutions of
only the immediate context or personal perspectives and connections practical situations. Or
environment. Connections to not incorporated in thought processes. inappropriate connections. May
practice are either weak or too Analysis lacks substance. stimulate disagreement from
common (e.g., drawn from MKOs.
literature or general discussions):
lacks fresh ideas.

Shows interest to support the Needs much prodding and reminding. Tends to pull back the progress of
group, but needs prodding. Responses are too late to be beneficial to the group.
Typically delayed the output.
contributions/responses.

Poor grammar, mechanics. Poorly articulated. Difficult to read/ Lacks logical organization.
Organization affects the effective comprehend. May not invite readership. Inconsistent. Incoherent.
communication of ideas.
 [FAIL]
Insufficient indicators to merit credit
Inactive
(4.26-5.0)
INSTRUCTIONS: Use the dropdown list to fill in the BLUE BOXES (Items in the list below are hyperlinked; click t
(* Click here to go to Rubrics)
STEP 1. Identify your GROUP from the dropdown list. The corresponding boxes will then be automatically filled in b
STEP 2. For each member, fill in the PERFORMANCE LEVEL per criterion (this hyperlink leads to the 1st member o
STEP 3. Fill in the GRADE to the right of each performance level item (this hyperlink leads to the 1st member only,
STEP 4. Go to Summative Report Page and justify the grades. (Some data are auto-filled from this page.)

Please complete the data; form not ready for submission.

1 BIG5 <<< Select your group from the drop-down

Member #1 SHERIDAN YVONNE ALAB1.175

Item
Criteria Performance Level Grade
CONCEPTS: Distinguished 1.25
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Distinguished 1
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES: Competent 1.5
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
WRITING SKILLS: Distinguished 1
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas

Member #2 . Catherine Kaiser 1.225

Criteria Performance Level
CONCEPTS: Distinguished 1.25
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Distinguished 1
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES: Competent 1.5
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
WRITING SKILLS: Distinguished 1.25
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas

Member #3 . Maria Kathrina Manucot 1.325

Criteria Performance Level
CONCEPTS: Distinguished 1
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Distinguished 1.25
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES: Competent 2
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
WRITING SKILLS: Distinguished 1.25
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas
 Member #4 . Rachel Pahilagmago 1.275
Criteria Performance Level
CONCEPTS: Distinguished 1.25
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Distinguished 1
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES: Competent 1.75
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
WRITING SKILLS: Distinguished 1.25
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas

Member #5 . Germiline Fei San Pedro 1.425

Criteria Performance Level
CONCEPTS: Distinguished 1.25
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING: Competent 1.5
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES: Competent 1.75
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
WRITING SKILLS: Distinguished 1.25
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas

Member #6 . ---
Criteria Performance Level
CONCEPTS:
Theoretical Clarity/ Elaboration
HIGH-ORDER THINKING:
Integration; Practical Connections
ATTITUDES:
Diligence, initiative, timeliness,
cooperation
ARTICULATION:
Eloquence; Reader impact;
Organization of ideas
E BOXES (Items in the list below are hyperlinked; click to go to the respective cells.)

The corresponding boxes will then be automatically filled in by the names of the members of the group.
LEVEL per criterion (this hyperlink leads to the 1st member only, light blue boxes). Avoid flat/ same scores.
ance level item (this hyperlink leads to the 1st member only, darker blue boxes). Avoid flat/ same scores.
grades. (Some data are auto-filled from this page.)

<<< Select your group from the drop-down menu. Then fill in the blue boxes below, light blue before

Performance Description
Ideas are well-integrated and personally synthesized. Rich elaboration clearly demonstrates deep understanding of theory.

Analysis is systematic, logical, encompassing. Holistic grasp of relationships to explain events and situations. Stimulates fu

Usually facilitates motion. Typically prompt and can be relied on.

Mostly responsible for organization of ideas. Concise without prejudice against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and

Performance Description
Ideas are well-integrated and personally synthesized. Rich elaboration clearly demonstrates deep understanding of theory.

Analysis is systematic, logical, encompassing. Holistic grasp of relationships to explain events and situations. Stimulates fu

Usually facilitates motion. Typically prompt and can be relied on.

Mostly responsible for organization of ideas. Concise without prejudice against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and

Performance Description
Ideas are well-integrated and personally synthesized. Rich elaboration clearly demonstrates deep understanding of theory.

Analysis is systematic, logical, encompassing. Holistic grasp of relationships to explain events and situations. Stimulates fu

Usually facilitates motion. Typically prompt and can be relied on.

Mostly responsible for organization of ideas. Concise without prejudice against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and
 Performance Description
Ideas are well-integrated and personally synthesized. Rich elaboration clearly demonstrates deep understanding of theory.

Analysis is systematic, logical, encompassing. Holistic grasp of relationships to explain events and situations. Stimulates fu

Usually facilitates motion. Typically prompt and can be relied on.

Mostly responsible for organization of ideas. Concise without prejudice against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and

Performance Description
Ideas are well-integrated and personally synthesized. Rich elaboration clearly demonstrates deep understanding of theory.

Good practical connections. Recognizes current issues and provides resolutions, which are good but rather common (predi

Usually facilitates motion. Typically prompt and can be relied on.

Mostly responsible for organization of ideas. Concise without prejudice against clarity. Excellent articulation, grammar and

Performance Description
 Please complete the data; form not ready for submission.

>

###

& explorati###

###

piring. Eloquen
###

###

###

& explorati###

###

piring. Eloquen
###

###

###

& explorati###

###

piring. Eloquen
###

###
 ###

& explorati###

###

piring. Eloquen
###

###

###

rather than###
in

###

piring. Eloquen
###

###

###

###

###

###

###
 SUMMARY REPORT
Except for blue boxes, this sheet is AUTO-FILLED from the Data Entry Sheet.
Group: 30% 30% 20%
1 BIG5 GRADE CONCEPTS HOTS ATTITUDES
SHERIDAN YVONNE ALABA 1.18 1.25 1.00 1.50

Catherine Kaiser 1.23 1.25 1.00 1.50

Maria Kathrina Manucot 1.33 1.00 1.25 2.00

Rachel Pahilagmago 1.28 1.25 1.00 1.75

Germiline Fei San Pedro 1.42 1.25 1.50 1.75

--- - - -

^ When indicated, member's pledge pending and may not be enlisted in the group at the time this form was prepared.
ry Sheet.
20%
ARTICULATION
1.00
Justification
required-->

1.25
Justification
required-->

1.25
Justification
required-->

1.25
Justification
required-->

1.25
Justification
required-->

-
Justification
required-->
 Go to to Rubrics
Return to Data Entry. Form not ready for submission.
TYPE IN A BRIEF JUSTIFICATION FOR YOUR ASSESSMENT (10-400 characters @blue box)
I made sure to do my part in the group activity. I explained the ideas that I had supporting it with concepts that I have learned about
through the modules. Furthermore, I was a good team player able to compromise with the rest of my teammates.

Although we agreed that there would be no leaders in our group, Ck did great in facilitating the group. She made a schedule that
helped us progress smoothly. She also gave insightful ideas all throughout the activity.

Kath did well in explaining her thoughts. She did not hesitate to impart her knowledge with us and ask questions directly when there
are some items that are unclear or different from her perspectives. At times we struggle to collaborate because of busy schedules
but regardless her inputs were valuable.

Rachel elaborated all her ideas well. She backed them up with theories and concepts related to the topic. She also shared necessary
information and insights that helped us progress throughout the entire activity.

Germie was extremely helpful. She shared her ideas about the different concepts as well as some important theories and concepts
that can support our output. Her outputs were often brief and concise.