Chapter 17
Chapter 17
Page
17.1 General 17-3
17.1.1 Overview 17-3
17.1.2 Site Reconnaissance 17-3
17.1.3 Field Investigation 17-3
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-1
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-2
Chapter 17 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs,
Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
17.1 General
17.1.1 Overview
This chapter covers the geotechnical design of lightly loaded structures which include: noise barriers,
sign bridges, cantilevered signs and signals, strain pole standards, luminaires, culverts not supported on
foundation elements, and small buildings. Small buildings typically include single story structures such
as structures in park and ride lots, rest areas, or WSDOT maintenance facilities. Standard Plan designs
found in the WSDOT Standard Plans For Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction – M21-01 have been
developed for all of these structures except for small buildings and culverts. Both shallow (e.g. spread
footings) and moderately deep foundations (trenches and shafts) have been designed to support these
lightly loaded structures in a variety of soil and site conditions. The structural design of these facilities is
addressed in the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual and WSDOT Design Manual.
During the site reconnaissance, observations of the condition of existing slopes (natural and cut) in the
immediate vicinity of the structures should be inspected for performance. It is especially important to
establish the presence of high ground water and any areas of soft soil. Many of these structures have very
shallow foundations and the investigation may only consist of general site reconnaissance with minimal
subsurface investigation. The geotechnical designer should have access to detailed plan views showing
existing site features, utilities, proposed construction and right-of-way limits. With this information,
the geotechnical designer can review structure locations, making sure that survey information agrees
reasonably well with observed topography. The geotechnical designer should look for indications of soft
soil and unstable ground. Observation of existing slopes should include vegetation, in particular the types
of vegetation that may indicate wet soil. Equisetum (horsetail), cattails, blackberry and alder can be used
to identity wet or unstable soils. Potential geotechnical hazards such as landslides that could affect the
structures should be identified. The identification and extent/condition (i.e., thickness) of existing
man-made fills should be noted, because many of these structures may be located in engineered fills.
Surface and subsurface conditions that could affect constructability of the foundations, such as the
presence of shallow bedrock, or cobbles and boulders, should be identified.
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-3
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
exploration and laboratory test program should be developed to obtain information to analyze foundation
stability, settlement, and constructability with respect to:
• Geological formation(s)
• Location and thickness of soil and rock units
• Engineering properties of soil and rock units such as unit weight, shear strength and compressibility
• Groundwater conditions (seasonal variations)
• Ground surface topography
• Local considerations, (e.g., liquefiable soils, expansive or dispersive soil deposits, underground voids
from solution weathering or mining activity, or slope instability potential)
Standard foundations for sign bridges, cantilever signs, cantilever signals and strain pole standards
are based on allowable lateral bearing pressure and angle of internal friction of the foundation soils.
The determination of these values can be estimated by Standard Penetration Test (SPT). Portable
Penetrometer Tests (PPT) may be used to obtain the soil data provided the blow count data is properly
converted to an equivalent standard penetrometer “N” value. The designer should refer to WSDOT
GDM Chapter 3 for details regarding the proper conversion factors of PPT to SPT. Every structure
foundation location does not need to be drilled. Specific field investigation requirements for the structures
addressed in this chapter are summarized in Table 17-1.
Noise barriers For noise barriers less than 100 ft in length, the exploration should occur
approximately midpoint along the alignment and should be completed on the
alignment of the noise barrier face. For noise barriers more than 100 ft in length,
exploration points should be spaced every 200 to 400 feet, depending on the
uniformity of subsurface conditions. Locate at least one exploration point near the
most critical location for stability. Exploration points should be completed as close
to the alignment of the noise barrier face as possible. For noise barriers placed on
slopes, an additional boring off the wall alignment to investigate overall stability of
the wall-slope combination should be obtained.
Table 17-1 Field investigation requirements for cantilever signals, strain poles,
cantilever signs, sign bridges, luminaires, noise barriers, and buildings.
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-4
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
The depth of the borings will vary depending on the expected loads being applied
to the foundation and/or site soil conditions. The borings should be extended to
a depth below the bottom elevation of the building foundation a minimum of 2.5
times the width of the spread footing foundation or 1.5 times the length of a deep
foundation (i.e., piles or shafts). Exploration depth should be great enough to fully
penetrate soft highly compressible soils (e.g., peat, organic silt, soft fine grained
soils) into competent material suitable bearing capacity (e.g., stiff to hard cohesive
soil, compact dense cohesionless soil or bedrock).
Culverts (without If no new fill is being placed, the culvert diameter is 3 ft or less, soft soil is known
foundation to not be present immediately below the culvert, and the culvert is installed by
elements) excavating through the fill, only a site and office review conducted as described
in WSDOT GDM Chapter 2 is required, plus hand holes to obtain samples for pH
and resistivity sampling for corrosion assessment for the culvert. If new fill is being
placed, the borings obtained for the design of the fill itself may suffice (see WSDOT
GDM Chapter 9), provided the stratigraphy below the length of the culvert can be
defined. Otherwise, a minimum of two borings should be obtained, one near the
one-third or one-quarter points toward each end of the culvert. For culverts greater
than 300 ft in length, an additional boring near the culvert midpoint should be
obtained. Borings should be located to investigate both the subsurface conditions
below the culvert, and the characteristics of the fill beside and above the culvert if
some existing fill is present at the culvert site. If the culvert is to be jacked through
existing fill, borings in the fill and at the jacking and receiving pit locations should
be obtained, to a depth of 3 to 5 ft below the culvert for the boring(s) in the fill, and
to the anticipated depth of the shoring/reaction frame foundations in the jacking
and receiving pits.
Hand holes and portable penetrometer measurements may be used for culverts
with a diameter of 3 ft or less, if the depth of exploration required herein can be
obtained. Otherwise, SPT and/or CPT borings must be obtained.
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-5
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
A friction angle for the soil is also needed for the foundation design for these structures, typically to
evaluate torsional stability. See WSDOT GDM Chapter 5 for the determination of soil friction angles,
either from correlation to SPT N values, or from laboratory testing.
Table 17-2 should be used to check if standard foundation designs are applicable for the specific site.
The values in Table 17-2 may also be used for special site specific foundation design to adjust depths or
dimensions of standard foundations (except noise barriers) to address soil conditions that are marginal
or poorer than the conditions assumed by the standard foundation design, or to address nonstandard
loadings. In such cases, the values from Table 17-2 should be used as the allowable soil pressure S1
in Article 13.10 of the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs,
Luminaires, and Traffic Signals (AASHTO, 2001).
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-6
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Table 17-2 Design parameter correlations for the design of signal, signs,
sign bridge, and luminaire foundations.
Some additional requirements regarding characterization of marginal soil conditions are as follows:
• Consider the soil throughout the entire depth of the proposed foundation. Where the foundation
soil is stratified, a weighted average N value should be used to design the foundation. An exception
would be where soft soils are encountered at the ground surface, in which case the use of a weighted
average is not appropriate.
• For foundations installed in embankments constructed from select or gravel borrow compacted using
Method B or C in the WSDOT Standard Specifications, it can generally be assumed that standard
foundations can be used, as such embankments will generally have “N” values of 25 or more, which
are more than adequate for standard foundations. A standard foundation may also be used where 75%
or more of the foundation is to be placed in new fill, provided that the foundation soil below the fill
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-7
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
has a SPT of 8 or more. For Common Borrow compacted using Method B or C in the WSDOT
Standard Specifications, standard foundations designed allowable lateral bearing pressures of 2,000
psf or less may be used.
• In general, vertical loads for sign, signal, and luminaire structure foundations are very low (i.e., 2 ksf
or less) and usually do not control design. However, if it is discovered that very soft silts, clays, or
peat (say, N = 4 or less) is present within the bottom 1 to 2 ft or more of the foundation, consideration
should also be given to a special foundation design in this case to avoid direct bearing on these very
soft soils.
The allowable lateral soil bearing values in Table 17-2 apply only to relatively flat conditions. If sloping
ground is present, some special considerations in determining the foundation depth are needed. Always
evaluate whether or not the local geometry will affect the foundation design. For all foundations placed
in a slope or where the centerline of the foundation is less than 1B for the shoulder of the slope
(B = width or diameter of the Standard Foundation), the Standard Plan foundation depths should be
increased as follows, and as illustrated in Figure 17-1:
• For slopes 3H:1V or flatter, no additional depth is required.
• For 2H:1V or flatter, add 0.5B to the depth.
• For 1.5H:1V slopes, add 1.0B to the depth.
Interpolation between the values is acceptable. These types of foundations should not be placed on slopes
steeper than 1.5H:1V. If the foundation is located on a slope that is part of a drainage ditch, the top of the
standard foundation can simply be located at or below the bottom of the drainage ditch.
X
1 D = foundation depth
d = increase in foundation
B
depth due to slope
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-8
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Note that these sloping ground recommendations do not apply to luminaire foundations.
When a nonstandard foundation design using Table 17-2 is required, the geotechnical designer must
develop a table identifying the soil units, soil unit boundary elevations, allowable lateral bearing pressure,
and soil friction angle for each soil unit. The structural designer will use these data to prepare the
nonstandard foundation design.
17.2.2 Special Design for Cantilever Signals, Strain Poles, Cantilever Signs,
Sign Bridges, and Luminaires
For foundations in rock, a special design is always required, and Table 17-2 is not applicable. Fracturing
and jointing in the rock, and its effect on the foundation resistance, must be evaluated. In general, a
drilled shaft or anchored footing foundation will be required. Foundation designs based on Table 17-2
are also not applicable if the foundation soil consists of very soft clays, silts, organic silts, or peat. In
such cases, a footing designed to “float” above the very soft compressible soils, over-excavation and
replacement with higher quality material, or very deep foundations are typically required.
For shaft type foundations in soil, the Broms Method as specified in the AASHTO Standard Specifications
for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals (AASHTO, 2001) or the
procedures specified in WSDOT GDM Chapter 8 for lateral load analysis of deep foundations (e.g.,
P-y analysis) should be used for conditions where Table 17-2 is not applicable, or as an alternative to
Table 17-2 based design. For shafts in rock, nominal lateral resistance should be estimated based on
the procedures provided in WSDOT GDM Chapter 8. This means that for special lateral load design
of shaft foundations, the geotechnical designer will need to provide P-y curve data to the structural
designer to complete the soil-structure interaction analysis. For spread footing design, the design
methods provided in WSDOT GDM Chapter 8 to estimate nominal bearing resistance and settlement
should be used, but instead of the referenced load groups and resistance factors, the AASHTO Standard
Specifications for Highway Bridges (2002) combined with a minimum bearing capacity safety factor
of 2.3 for Load Factor Design (LFD), or 3.0 for allowable stress or service load design (ASD) should
be used for static conditions, and a safety factor of 1.1 should be used for seismic conditions, if seismic
conditions are applicable. Note that in general, the foundations for the types of structures addressed in
this chapter are not mitigated for liquefaction (see WSDOT GDM Chapter 6). For anchored footing
foundations over bedrock, anchor depth, spacing, and nominal resistance shall be assessed considering
the degree of fracturing and jointing in the rock (see WSDOT GDM Chapters 5, 8, and 12 for design
requirements).
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-9
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
withstanding the design lateral soil bearing pressure created by wind and dead loads. The details on the
foundation designs can be found in Section J-7 of the Standard Plans and in Chapter 8 of the WSDOT
Design Manual.
For round shafts, the standard foundation designs assume for torsional stability that the soil to foundation
contact friction angle is 30o, which is typical for concrete cast against soil for moderate strength soils.
Deep shaft foundations greater than 9 ft may require the use of temporary casing, slurries or both.
Generally in most cases, the temporary casing can be removed. Special foundations designs may be
required if the geotechnical designer determines that permanent casing is necessary. In this situation, the
structural designer must be informed of this condition. These structures are under lateral and rotational
loads. The shear capacity of the foundation under a rotational force is reduced if steel casing remains
in the ground. It is important to note here that if the foundation design assumes that the soil around the
shaft, assuming the contractor makes an open excavation and then backfills the excavation cavity around
the formed foundation, is properly compacted, the degree of compaction is somehow verified in the field.
The geotechnical designer needs to make sure that the construction specifications are clear in this regard,
and that the project inspectors know what needs to be done to enforce the specifications. If the degree of
compaction cannot be verified in the field due to the depth of the open excavation and safety regulations,
this needs to be taken into consideration in the selection of soil design parameters. The specifications also
need to be clear regarding the removal of temporary forms (e.g., sonotubes) for the foundations. If for
some reason they cannot be removed due to the depth of the hole or other reasons, sonotubes should not
be used. Instead, corrugated metal pipe should be used so that torsional resistance of the foundation is
maintained.
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-10
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
There are three cantilever sign foundation types in the WSDOT Standard Plans. The structural details
are shown in Standard Plan G-3a. These foundations are similar to the sign bridge foundations. Type
1 cantilever sign foundations consist of two 10 ft long drilled shafts. The Type 2 and 3 foundations are
a massive concrete trench foundation that is 3 ft by 10 ft in plan area with an embedment that can vary
between 8 ft and 12.5 ft. Embedment depth of the foundation is controlled by the total square feet of
exposed sign area. All designs assume a concrete to soil contact.
The geotechnical designer must evaluate the stability of open excavations. Obviously, high groundwater
could affect the stability of the side slopes of the excavation. Casing for drilled shafts or shoring boxes
for the trench footing would be required under these conditions. All of these foundations have been
designed assuming a concrete to soil contact. Generally in most cases, the temporary casing for drilled
shafts can be removed. Special foundations designs may be required if the geotechnical designer
determines that permanent casing is necessary. In this situation, the structural engineer must be informed
of this condition. These structures are under lateral and rotational loads. The shear capacity of the
foundation under a rotational force is reduced if steel casing remains in the ground.
It is important to note here that if the foundation design assumes that the soil around the shaft, assuming
the contractor makes an open excavation and then backfills the excavation cavity around the formed
foundation, is properly compacted, the degree of compaction is somehow verified in the field. The
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-11
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
geotechnical designer needs to make sure that the construction specifications are clear in this regard, and
that the project inspectors know what needs to be done to enforce the specifications. If the degree of
compaction cannot be verified in the field due to the depth of the open excavation and safety regulations,
this needs to be taken into consideration in the selection of soil design parameters. The specifications also
need to be clear regarding the removal of temporary forms (e.g., sonotubes) for the foundations. If for
some reason they cannot be removed due to the depth of the hole or other reasons, sonotubes should not
be used. Instead, corrugated metal pipe should be used so that torsional resistance of the foundation is
maintained.
The standard foundation designs assume for torsional stability that the soil to foundation contact friction
angle is 30o, which is typical for concrete cast against soil for moderate strength soils.
< 1.5 ft
2 max
1 D = foundation depth = 8 ft (standard)
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-12
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Deep shaft foundations (i.e., special designs) greater than 9 ft may require the use of temporary casing,
slurries or both. Generally, in most cases, the temporary casing can be removed. Special foundations
designs may be required if the geotechnical designer determines that permanent casing is necessary.
In this situation, the structural designer must be informed of this condition. These structures are under
lateral and rotational loads. The shear capacity of the foundation under a rotational force is reduced if
steel casing remains in the ground.
It is important to note here that if the foundation design assumes that the soil around the shaft, assuming
the contractor makes an open excavation and then backfills the excavation cavity around the formed
foundation, is properly compacted, the degree of compaction is somehow verified in the field. The
geotechnical designer needs to make sure that the construction specifications are clear in this regard, and
that the project inspectors know what needs to be done to enforce the specifications. If the degree of
compaction cannot be verified in the field due to the depth of the open excavation and safety regulations,
this needs to be taken into consideration in the selection of soil design parameters. The specifications also
need to be clear regarding the removal of temporary forms (e.g., sonotubes) for the foundations. If for
some reason they cannot be removed due to the depth of the hole or other reasons, sonotubes should not
be used. Instead, corrugated metal pipe should be used so that torsional resistance of the foundation is
maintained.
Three foundation options are available for the cast-in-place and pre-cast concrete barriers. They include
round shafts and spread footings. The spread footing foundation option has two designs. One design
consists of an offset panel and a second design consists of a uniform panel where the panel wall bears
in the middle of the footing. The following is a summary of the critical design elements of noise barrier
walls:
• All noise barrier spread footing standard foundations have been designed assuming an allowable
bearing pressure of 2 kips per square foot (ksf).
• The diameter and length of the standard shaft foundations can also vary with soil condition, exposed
panel height and loading condition. The lengths vary from 4.75 ft to 13.25 ft, and shaft diameters
vary between 1.0 to 2.5 ft.
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-13
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
In addition, the geotechnical designer shall perform a global stability analysis of the noise barrier when
the barrier is located on or at the crest of a cut or fill slope. The design slope model must include a
surcharge load equal to the footing bearing stress. The minimum slope stability factor of safety of the
structure and slope shall be 1.3 or greater for static conditions and 1.1 for seismic conditions. Note that in
general, the foundations for noise barriers are not mitigated for liquefaction (see WSDOT GDM
Chapter 6).
All Standard Plan noise barrier structures have been designed to retain a minimal amount of soil that must
be no more than 4 ft in height with a level backslope. The retained soil above the noise barrier foundation
is assumed to have a friction angle of 34o and a wall interface friction of 0.67φ, resulting in a Ka of 0.26
for the retained soil, and a unit weight of 125 pcf. All standard and non-standard noise barrier foundation
designs shall include the effects of any differential fill height between the front and back of the wall.
The noise barrier footing shall be designed to be stable for overturning and sliding. The methodology and
safety factors provided in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges (2002) applicable to
gravity walls in general for overturning and sliding (FS of 2.0 and 1.5, respectively for static conditions,
and 1.5 and 1.1 for seismic conditions), shall be used to assess noise barrier stability for these two limit
states, using service loads.
The geotechnical designer will also be responsible to estimate foundation settlement using the appropriate
settlement theories and methods as outlined in WSDOT GDM Chapter 8. The geotechnical designer
will report the estimated total and differential settlement.
The soil properties (unit weight, friction and cohesion) shall be determined using the procedures described
in WSDOT GDM Chapter 5.
Noise barrier footings shall be located relative to the final grade to have a minimum soil cover over the
top of the footing of 2 ft.
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-14
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
For the Standard Plan noise barrier footing foundation, the geotechnical designer shall use the procedures
described above to estimate the allowable bearing resistance for the foundation with consideration to
the actual site and subsurface conditions for the wall, and to verify that the allowable bearing resistance
is greater than the standard foundation design bearing stress of 2.0 ksf. Note that the standard noise
barrier foundations have been designed to resist a PGA of 0.35g. This corresponds to a peak bedrock
acceleration (PBA) from Figure 6-6 in WSDOT GDM Chapter 6 of 0.3g and an amplification factor of
1.18, corresponding to stiff soil.
For nonstandard noise barrier designs, use Mononabe-Okabe analysis in accordance with WSDOT GDM
Chapter 15 to determine the seismic earth pressure if the noise barrier retains soil.
The standard foundation designs used for the Standard Plan noise barriers are based on the following
assumptions:
• Noise barrier standard foundation designs assume one of the following:
o The wall is founded at the crest of a 2H:1V slope with a minimum of 3 ft of horizontal distance
between the panel face and the slope break. The top 2 ft of passive resistance below the assumed
ground surface at the noise barrier face is ignored in the development of the wall pressure
diagram. For this case, groundwater must be at or below the bottom of the noise barrier
foundation.
o The wall is founded on a near horizontal slope (i.e., 6H:1V or flatter) with a minimum of 3 ft of
horizontal distance between the panel face and the slope break. The top 2 ft of passive resistance
below the assumed ground surface at the noise barrier face is ignored in the development of the
wall pressure diagram. For this case, groundwater must be at or below 5 ft below the top of the
noise barrier foundation.
• The standard shaft foundation designs have been designed for two different soil conditions,
assuming the slope conditions in front of the wall as indicated above. One design assumes an
average soil friction angle of 32 degrees (D1), resulting in a design Kp of 1.45 (2H:1V slope) or 5.7
(near horizontal slope) and Ka of 0.29, and the second design assumes an average soil friction angle
of 38 degrees (D2), resulting in a design Kp of 2.2 (2H:1V slope) or 8.8 (near horizontal slope) and
Ka of 0.22. All values of Ka and Kp reported above have been corrected to account for the angular
deviation of the active or passive force from the horizontal (in these design cases, the correction
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-15
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
factor, Cos (δ), where δ is the interface friction angle, is approximately equal to 0.9 to 0.93). The
standard shaft foundation designs are based on standard earth pressure theory derived using
logarithmic spiral method for Kp and the Coulomb method for Ka, assuming the interface friction
between the foundation and the soil to be 0.67φ. A unit weight of 125 pcf was also assumed in the
design. This unit weight assumes that the ground water level at the site is below the bottom of the
noise barrier foundation. For the case where groundwater is considered, the effective unit weight of
the soil is used below the water table (i.e., 62.6 pcf). For the shaft foundation design, it is assumed
that the passive earth pressure is applied over a lateral distance along the wall of 3B, where B is the
shaft diameter and 3.0 is the magnitude of the isolation factor for discrete shafts, or the
center-to-center spacing of the shafts, whichever is less. A factor of safety of 1.5 should also applied
to the passive resistance.
• The PGA for seismic design is assumed to be 0.35g. This corresponds to a peak bedrock acceleration
(PBA) from Figure 6-6 in WSDOT GDM Chapter 6 of 0.3g and an amplification factor of 1.18,
corresponding to stiff soil. Kae, the seismic lateral earth pressure coefficient, was developed
assuming that the acceleration A = 0.5PGA.
• All standard foundation designs assume a concrete to soil contact.
• Figures 17-3 and 17-4 illustrate the assumptions used for the standard trench or shaft foundation
designs.
Special designs will be required if the site and soil conditions differ from those conditions assumed for
design.
Ignore top 2 ft
of passive resistance
Fore-slope is
6H:1V or flatter I = 34o, Ka = 0.26
J = 125 pcf, Kae = 0.38 4 ft max.
B
Use 3Kp applied to foundation width, B, for discrete foundation units (shafts), and 1.0Kp for trench foundation.
Use FS = 1.5 applied to Kp (Kp values shown above have not been factored).
Ka is applied over foundation width, B.
Figure 17-3 Standard foundation design assumptions for shaft or trench foundations,
assuming near level ground conditions and ground water above bottom of foundation.
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-16
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Ignore top 2 ft
of passive resistance
Fore-slope is
2H:1V or flatter I = 34o, Ka = 0.26
J = 125 pcf, Kae = 0.38 4 ft max.
I = 32o, Kp = 1.45
J = 125 pcf
or, I = 32o, Ka = 0.29
J = 125 pcf
I = 38o, Kp = 2.2
J = 125 pcf or,
I = 38o, Ka = 0.22
J = 125 pcf
W.T. B
Use 3Kp applied to foundation width, B, for discrete foundation units (shafts), and 1.0Kp for trench foundation.
Use FS = 1.5 applied to Kp (Kp values shown above have not been factored).
Ka is applied over foundation width, B.
Figure 17-4 Standard foundation design assumptions for shaft or trench foundations,
assuming 2H:1V slope in front of wall and ground water below foundation.
If non-standard foundation designs are required, the geotechnical designer should provide the following
information to the structural designer:
• Description of the soil units using Unified Soil Classification System (WSDOT GDM Chapters 4
and 5).
• Ground elevation and elevation of soil/rock unit boundaries.
• Depth to the water table along the length of the wall.
• Earth pressure diagrams and design parameters developed in accordance with WSDOT GDM
Chapter 15 and this section. Soil unit strength parameters that include effective unit weight,
cohesion, φ, Ka, Kp, and Kae. For shaft foundations, passive pressures are assumed to act over 3 shaft
diameters, and a factor of safety of 1.5 should be applied to the passive resistance.
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-17
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
• The allowable bearing resistance for spread footings and estimated wall settlement.
• Overall wall stability.
• Any foundation constructability issues resulting from the soil/rock conditions.
The structural designer will use this information to develop a special foundation design for the noise
barrier.
17.4 Culverts
17.4.1 Overview
This section only addresses culverts, either flexible or rigid, that do not require foundation elements such
as footing or piles. Culverts that require foundation elements are addressed in WSDOT GDM
Chapter 8.
For case 1, little geotechnical design is needed. The soil conditions in the fill and just below the culvert
should be investigated, primarily to assess constructability issues such as excavation slopes and shoring
design (usually done by the contractor). If soft soils are present near the bottom of the culvert, the
feasibility of obtaining stable excavation slopes of reasonable steepness should be assessed. The presence
of boulders in the fill or below the fill, depending on the shoring type anticipated, could influence
feasibility. However, settlement and bearing issues for the new or replaced culvert should not be
significant, since no new load is being placed on the soil below the culvert.
For case 2, the effect of the soil conditions in the fill on the ability to jack the culvert through the fill
should be evaluated. Very dense conditions or the presence of obstructions in the fill such as boulders
could make jacking infeasible. Ground water within the fill or the presence of clean sands or gravels that
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-18
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
could “run” could again make jacking problematic, unless special measures are taken by the contractor
to prevent caving. Since a stable jacking platform must be established, along with the shoring required
to form the jacking and receiving pits, deeper test hole data adequate for shoring design must be obtained
and analyzed to assess earth pressure parameters for shoring design, and to design the reaction frame for
the jacking operation.
For case 3, differential and total settlement along the culvert is the key issue that must be evaluated,
in addition to the case 1 issue identified above. See WSDOT GDM Chapter 9 for the estimation of
settlement due to new fill.
17.5 Buildings
17.5.1 Overview
The provisions of this section cover the design requirements for small building structures typical of
WSDOT rest areas, maintenance and ferry facilities. It is assumed these buildings are not subject to
scour or water pressure by wind or wave action. Typically, buildings may be supported on shallow spread
footings, or on pile or shaft foundations for conditions where soft compressible soils are present.
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-19
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Table 17-3 Allowable Foundation and Lateral Pressure, as provided in 2003 IBC,
in Table 1804.2.
In addition to using the 2003 IBC design code, the geotechnical designer should perform a foundation
bearing capacity analyses (including settlement) using the methods outlined in WSDOT GDM Chapter
8 to obtain nominal resistance values. These design methods will result in ultimate (nominal) capacities.
Normally, allowable stress design is conducted for foundations that support buildings and similar
structures. Appropriate safety factors must be applied to determine allowable load transfer. Factors of
safety to be used for allowable stress design of foundations shall be as follows:
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-20
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
The results of the ASD foundation bearing capacity analyses, after reducing the foundation bearing
capacity by the specified FS from Table 17-4, and further reduced to meet settlement criteria for the
foundation (normally, no FS is applied for settlement analysis results), should be checked against the IBC
design code, and the most conservative results used.
For allowable stress design, spread footings on sandy soils may alternatively be designed for bearing and
settlement by using Figure 17-5. When using Figure 17-5, a FS from Table 17-4 does not need to be
applied, as the bearing stresses in the figure represent allowable bearing resistances. The design bearing
resistance in Figure 17-5 has been developed assuming footing settlement will be limited to no more than
1 inch. The N-values needed to estimate bearing resistance in the figure should be determined from SPT
blow counts that have been corrected for both overburden pressure and hammer efficiency, and hence
represent N160 values (see WSDOT GDM Chapter 5).
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-21
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Note that other issues may need to be addressed regarding the design of buildings and associated
structures. For example, significant earthwork may be required. For cut and fill design, see WSDOT
GDM Chapters 9 and 10. For the stabilization of unstable ground, see WSDOT GDM Chapter 13. If
ground improvement is required, see WSDOT GDM Chapter 11. If retaining walls are required, see
WSDOT GDM Chapter 15.
If septic drain field(s) are needed, local regulations will govern the geotechnical design, including who is
qualified to perform the design (i.e., a special license may be required). In general, the permeability of
the soil and the maximum seasonal ground water level will need to be assessed for septic system designs.
Note that in general, the foundations for the types of structures addressed in this chapter are not mitigated
for liquefaction (see WSDOT GDM Chapter 6). However, for building foundations, liquefaction and
other seismic hazards are at least assessed in terms of the potential impact to the proposed structures.
Liquefaction and other seismic hazards are mitigated for building and other structures for which the
International Building Code (IBC) governs and mitigation is required by the IBC.
17.6 References
AASHTO, 1988, AASHTO Manual on Subsurface Investigations.
AASHTO, 1989, AASHTO Guide Specifications for Structural Design of Sound Barriers
(including 2002 interim).
AASHTO, 2001, AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs,
Luminaires, and Traffic Signals.
AASHTO, 2002, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials, Seventeenth Edition, Washington, D.C., USA, 686 p.
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-22
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
AASHTO, 2004, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials, Third Edition, Washington, D.C., USA.
International Code Council, Inc., (2002), 2003 International Building Code. Country Club Hills, IL.
Patterson, D., 1962, How to Design Pole-Type Buildings, American Wood Preservers Institute, Chicago,
3rd edition.
Peck, R. B., W. E. Hanson, and T. H. Thornburn. 1974. Foundation Engineering. 2nd ed. John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York, NY, p. 514.
WSDOT Standard Plans For Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction (M 21-01)
Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03 Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers,
December 2006 Culverts, and Buildings
Chapter 17-23
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Culverts, and Buildings
Foundation Design for Signals, Signs, Noise Barriers, Geotechnical Design Manual M 46-03
Culverts, and Buildings December 2006
Chapter 17-24