Maint Philsp N Devlp Progr
Maint Philsp N Devlp Progr
Maint Philsp N Devlp Progr
Definition
Philosophy A set of ideas or beliefs relating to a particular field or activity. Maintenance The process (includes inspection, servicing, overhaul, repair, preservation, and replacement) of ensuring that a system continually performs its intended function at its designed in level of reliability and safety. and preventive maintenance. Maintenance Program Program which define logical sequence of maintenance action to be performed as even or pieces of whole which when performed collectively result in achievement of the desired Maintenance Standard. It is compiled of individual maintenance and inspections functions utilized by an operator to fulfill its total maintenance needs. It includes corrective maintenance
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Generally, Prevention Cost and Correction Cost are inverserly to each other. Generally, Maintenance Cost is sum of Prevention Cost and Correction Cost. Using Reliability Control Program, Maintenance Cost is adjusted to Minimum.
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Safe Life
Fail Save
Damage Tolerant
Page 12
Page 13
Hard Time
Page 15
On Condition
Potential failure : Point where functional failure is imminent. Scheduled inspection or test interval Functional failure : Point where the system does not longer fulfill its minimum required performance
Condition
Time
Page 16
Condition Monitoring
FOR EXAMPLE , THE AIRCRAFT COMPONENT HAS 10 FLIGHT CYCLES LIFE TIME
MOST OF THE AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS LIFE TIME ARE MORE THAN 10.000 FLIGHT CYCLES.
Page 17
Page 18
MSG-2 weakness
1. MSG-2 does not treat hidden functional failures adequately (this is even more critical in todays electronic aircraft where many redundant systems are hidden). 2. MSG-2 logic needs to be more rigorous. A user can determine what he/she wants to be done to a component and work the logic so that that outcome is generated. Emotion is not precluded from the decision making process. 3. MSG-2 does not address current FAA regulations, e.g. FAR 25.571 (damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structures), aging aircraft concerns, Corrosion Prevention and Control Program (CPCP) requirements, Enhanced Zonal Analysis Procedures (EZAP) that specifically address wiring concerns and promotes a clean as you go culture or analysis for Lightning/High Intensity Radiated Field (HIRF) tasks and intervals. 4. MSG-2 does not provides a strong and well tested analytical logic which helps eliminate and minimize emotion from the decision making process of determining if a maintenance task is needed or not.
Page 19
MSG-3 is better
Top down approach resulting in less task . Integration redundancy. Task oriented avoid confusing task to be done. Clear differentiate safety task and economical task. Promoted by FAA. Significantly impact to economical return by 30 % in reducing man-hour usage and reduce A/C ground time for routine maintenance. CPCP and Structural Inspection eliminate
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
5
Page 29
Page 30
OPERATIONAL or VISUAL Identification of failures must be CHECK possible. (OP or VC) Reduced resistance to failures must INSPECTION or be detectable, and there exists a FUNCTIONAL reasonably consistent interval CHECK between a deteriorated condition and (IN or FC) functional failure. The item must show functional degradation characteristics at an RESTORATION identifiable age and a large proportion of (RS) units must survive to that age. It must be possible to restore the item to a specific standard of failure resistance. DISCARD (DS)
Not applicable.
The task must reduce the risk of failures to assure safe operation
The item must show functional A safe-life limit must degradation characteristics at an reduce the risks of failure identifiable age and on a large proportion to assure safe operation of units are expected survive to that age.
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Maintenance Reference
Page 34
Maintenance interval
Page 35
1. 2. 3. 4.
Page 36
1. 2. 3. 4.
Page 37
1. 2. 3. 4.
Page 38
Service Bulletin
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Affectivity Issue date Alert / not alert Subject Content and task Economic evaluation Warranty etc
Page 39
Airworthiness Directive
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Affectivity Issue date Due date Subject Content and task Implementation reference etc
Page 40
Engineering Order
1. Affectivity 2. Mandatory or not 3. Issue date 4. Due date 5. Subject 6. Content and task 7. Work load / man-hour 8. Required feed back 9. Implementation reference 10. etc
Page 41
Job Card
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Affectivity Mandatory or not Issue date Subject Content and task Work load / man-hour Implementation reference etc
Page 42
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Affectivity Issue date Subject Content and task Work load / man-hour Required material Implementation reference etc
Page 43
Evaluate the source (basic of CAMP) or Analyze The Dirty Records by Engineers (TEA-TER)
MRB Document CMR Document ALI Document CPCP Document SSID Document Repair Document Existing AD Service Bulletin Service Letter Operators Experience
Physical Factor Care about the limitation of : five human senses, brain
Care about the worse condition of : mind function, among humans communication, human and machine communication, conflict, and stress. Understanding of theory by course, study, and training. Work experience by benchmarking, on the job training, and work practicing. Enthusiastic for new information, new knowledge, and new technology.
Page 45
Summary
1. Maintenance shall be implemented to achieve Inherent Reliability. 2. Manufacturer, Authority and Operator are close involved on Maintenance Program development. 3. Maintenance Cost shall be considered during Maintenance Program development. 4. Human Factor shall be considered during Maintenance Program implementation. 5. Garuda Indonesia has experienced to develop Maintenance Program refer to MSG-2 (DC-10, B747-200 and B737-Clasic) as well as Maintenance Program refer to MSG-3 (MD-11, B747-400, B737-NG, A330-200/300 and A320).
Page 46