AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L.

Geneve

PLANT PROPAGATION
Robert L. Geneve
Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Keywords: apomixis, automation, budding, cryopreservation, cuttings, graft

incompatibility, grafting, micropropagation, micrografting, seeds, seed coating, seed
priming, seed purity, seed vigor, somatic embryogenesis, tissue culture.

Contents

1. Sexual propagation
1.1. Seed testing
1.2. Treatments to enhance seed germination
1.3. Seed storage and germplasm preservation

S
TE S
2. Asexual propagation

R
AP LS
2.1. Apomixis
2.2. Cutting propagation
2.3. Grafting propagation
C EO
2.4. Micropropagation in tissue culture
3. Somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seeds
4. Automation and robotics in propagation
Glossary
Bibliography
E –
H

Summary
PL O
M SC

The preponderance of food and fiber for human consumption is derived from plants.
The ability to domesticate crop plants was a pivotal point in human evolution. It
permitted the transition from a predominantly nomadic lifestyle to one of more
centralized communities of towns and villages. In turn, this allowed for stratification in
SA NE

the community for specialized activities not directly related to acquiring food. Several
agricultural disciplines have evolved from the need to domesticate crops. These include
disciplines for selection of crops for superior characteristics (plant breeding),
U

multiplication of selected crops (plant propagation), cultivation of these crops

(agronomy, horticulture, forestry, entomology, plant pathology, etc.), and processing
and preserving harvested crops (food technology). This chapter will be a brief overview
of plant propagation. It is not possible to provide a detailed description of all the
techniques used for plant propagation (Table 1), but I will attempt to highlight some of
the current emerging technologies with their potential for future crop production. The
chapter will be divided into methods for sexual (seed) and asexual (vegetative)
propagation.

Propagation
Description Commercial use
method
Seeds form the sexual generation of Seed propagation is the most
the plant's life cycle. Seeds are either common form of propagation used to
Seeds
directly sown in the field to produce produce agronomic, horticultural and
seedlings or sown under protected forestry plants.

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

environments (greenhouses) to
produce transplants.
Cuttings are detached plant organs
(stem, leaf or root) used for clonal
propagation. Stem cuttings are the Cutting propagation is the most
Cuttings most common form of cutting common form of commercial clonal
propagation and require the (vegetative) propagation.
regeneration of a new (adventitious)
root system.
Grafting is the clonal propagation
method of choice in cases where
Grafting is the joining of two or plants will not easily root from
Grafting and
more genotypes in a way that they cuttings. It is also used in cases
budding
unite and form a single plant. where there is a distinct advantage to
using a special understock (such as
dwarfing or disease resistance).
Micropropagation is used to mass

S
TE S
propagate high-value crops that are
Micropropagation is the formation
Micropropagation slow to multiply by other clonal
of new plantlets in tissue culture.

R
AP LS
propagation methods. It is also used
to produce disease-free stock plants.
Many plants naturally multiply by
Division is the separation of a single division. It is an inexpensive
C EO
plant into multiple pieces each propagation method for perennial
Division
containing a portion of the growing species that form crowns or modified
point and root system. stems like many geophytes (bulb
crops).
A layer is analogous to a stem Layering is a relatively inexpensive
E –

cutting, but the stem forms roots propagation method that requires no
H

while it is still attached to the special equipment. It is not a major

Layering
PL O

mother plant. Plants that produce commercial practice except for

stolons or runners naturally mound layering (stooling) in apple
propagate by layers. and runners in strawberry.
M SC

Table 1. Summary of Propagation methods used for Crop Production

SA NE

1. Sexual Propagation

Among the many adaptations plants have made to cope with environmental stresses, the
evolution of seeds is one of the most important. Most commercial food, oil, timber, fiber
U

and ornamental bedding plant crops are propagated using seeds. Seeds are both the
starting point and final product of our most important agricultural commodities (i.e.
cereal and legume crops) and therefore, they are the foundation of our agricultural
cropping systems. There are significant challenges for the seed industry to maintain and
improve germination characteristics of seeds to meet the demand for food production
predicted for an increasing world population. Emerging technologies for seed
production and germination can be seen in the areas of testing, germination
enhancement, storage, and germplasm preservation.

1.1. Seed testing

Seed producers use seed testing to evaluate seed quality during seed production,
handling and storage, as well as to comply with international, federal or local seed laws.

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

High quality seeds are evaluated by tests for seed purity, viability, vigor and seed health.
Of these, the areas of seed purity and seed vigor evaluation are being significantly
impacted by emerging technologies.

Purity is the percentage by weight of the “pure seed” present in a sample. Purity
determination requires a trained seed analyst usually certified by a national or
international agency. Seed purity is comprised of both a physical and a genetic
component. During purity testing, seed lots must be evaluated for physical contaminants
such as soil particles, plant debris, other inert material, and weed seeds. However, it is
the genetic component of the evaluation process that is undergoing significant change.

S
TE S
R
AP LS
C EO
E –
H
PL O
M SC
SA NE
U

Figure 1. An example of seed vigor in greenhouse grown pansy seedlings. Both flats
show similar percentage emergence, but seedlings from the higher vigor seed lot in the
upper panel are germinating quickly and more uniformly.

For genetic purity, the seed analyst determines if the sample is the proper cultivar and
identifies the percentage of seeds that are either other contaminating cultivars or inbreds

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

in a hybrid seed lot. The analyst has relied upon field evaluation, physical characteristics
such as seed color, morphology, and various chemical tests to determine genetic purity.
More recently, direct methods of genetic evaluation of seed lots have been employed
including isozyme (characteristic seed proteins) separation by electrophoresis, and DNA
fingerprinting. These methods have become increasingly relevant due to the need to
evaluate seed lots for genetic modifications generated through genetic transformation
(GMOs). Currently, the two most important genetic modifications in commercial crops
are for insect resistance (i.e. the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis) and herbicide
resistance (i.e. gene for glyphosate tolerance), while cultivars with improved nutrition
will become important in the future (e.g. golden rice). Testing has become important to
ensure purity of the seed lot, but also to prevent unlicensed use of modified seeds and to
certify that a seed lot is GMO-free where this might be important for use of the
harvested crop.

Machine vision has the potential to make a significant impact on seed conditioning and

S
TE S
purity evaluation. Machine vision utilizes a digital camera to capture images of seeds

R
AP LS
that are subsequently evaluated by computer for either surface seed characteristics or
internal chemical makeup. This has the potential for speeding up evaluation of seeds for
purity by reducing the time required for direct analyst evaluation of the seed lot. For
C EO
example, physical characteristics of grass seeds have been utilized to separate tall fescue
from ryegrass seeds using machine vision.

Internal characteristics of seeds can also be evaluated by machine vision by using

cameras that evaluate in wavelengths other than the visual spectrum. For example, near-
E –

infrared spectroscopy can be used to evaluate a number of seed characteristics including

H

seed moisture, oil composition, and contaminating fungi. Machine vision may also
PL O

become an important aspect of evaluating seed lots for seed vigor. Seed vigor is the
ability of a seed to produce usable seedlings under less than optimal environments
M SC

(Figure 1). Compared with standard germination tests that evaluate seed viability, seed
vigor is a better predictor of field emergence. Vigor also declines in stored seeds prior to
any noticeable loss in viability. This makes measures of seed vigor a good predictor of
SA NE

imminent loss of viability in storage.

U

Figure 2. Evaluating seedling size for vigor determination. Digital image of impatiens
seedlings on the left were detected by computer analysis and measured for length and
area in the right panel.

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

The most common commercially used vigor tests are the cold test and accelerated aging
test. These tests are relatively labor intensive and can be difficult to standardize between
seed labs, but they have proven useful tests for seed producers. An alternative is to use
seedling growth under controlled environments as an indicator of seed vigor. There are
commercially available systems that analyze either digital images of emerged seedlings
in a plug tray or seedling length (radicle) in controlled petri dish germination conditions
(Figure 2). These are useful for small-seeded crops like ornamental bedding plants or
vegetables that are difficult to test using standard cold or accelerated aging tests for
vigor. However, as this technology improves and becomes mechanized, machine vision
may prove useful for testing a variety of crop seeds for viability and vigor.

1.2. Treatments to enhance seed germination

There are a number of commercial seed treatments to enhance seed propagation either
by facilitating mechanical sowing or improving the ability of the seed to germinate over

S
TE S
a wide range of environments. Three worth highlighting are seed coatings, priming and

R
AP LS
pregermination.
C EO
E –
H
PL O
M SC
SA NE
U

Figure 3. Pelleted or film coated seeds. Pelleted seeds have a round shape (upper panel),
while film coated seeds retain the original shape of the seed (lower panel).

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

Seeds are coated to change the shape of the seed (pelleting) to allow precision
mechanical sowing or covered with a thin polymer film (film coating) that acts as a
carrier for seed protectants (Figure 3). The technology to coat seeds comes from pill
manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. Pelleting builds inert material around the
seed to make it a uniform, round shape. Many small-seeded ornamental bedding plant
and vegetable crops are pelleted for precise mechanical sowing. In contrast, film coating
adds only 1 to 5% to the weight of a seed compared to over 1000% for pelletized seed.
Even so, this can still aid in precision sowing by improving flowability. Fungicides and
beneficial microbes can be added to both pellets and film coatings and is the major
benefit to film coating. Although chemical treatments (i.e. fungicides) dominate
industry seed treatments, the novel use of treating seeds with beneficial microbes
presents an interesting alternative to chemical treatments. Various biocontrol agents
provide protection to seeds by the production of antibiotic substances; competition for
space and nutrients; and parasitism. Common biocontrol agents include bacterial strains
like Eterobacter, Pseudomonas, Serratia, and fungal strains like Gliocladium and

S
TE S
Trichoderma. Several studies show disease prevention with biologicals to be as

R
AP LS
effective as chemical treatment with fungicides. In addition, seed coatings can include
nitrogen-fixing bacteria or seed safners to guard against herbicide injury during seedling
emergence.
C EO
Seed priming is a controlled seed hydration treatment that can reduce the time it takes
for seedlings to emerge (Figure 4). Seeds are hydrated under conditions that allow
physiological processes associated with germination to proceed, but do not allow the
radicle to emerge from the seed coat. After hydrating seeds for an extended time, seeds
E –

are dried back to near their original dry weight. These seeds can be handled as normal
H

raw seeds or pelletized prior to sowing. Techniques used to prime seeds include
PL O

osmotic, matric, and drum priming.

M SC
SA NE
U

Figure 4. Seed germination in primed versus non-primed seeds. Both groups of seeds
germinate at about the same percentage (95%), but the speed and uniformity of
germination is superior for the primed seeds.

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

Osmotic priming is currently the most common technique used to prime seeds. It
involves suspending seeds in an aerated osmotic solution (either salts or polyethylene
glycol). Concentration of the osmotic solution determines hydration of the seeds. Matrix
priming takes advantage of the water relations properties (matric potential) of various
moist, solid carriers (like vermiculite or calcined clay) to partially hydrate seeds. It is
most often practiced with large seeded crops such as corn.

The newer of these techniques to prime seeds is drum priming. This is a patented
practice where seeds are tumbled in a rotating drum that is mounted on a weighing
balance. As the drum rotates, water is sprayed uniformly on the seeds until a
predetermined hydration weight is obtained. This is often a preferred method because it
avoids having waste (salts of polyethylene glycol) to dispose of after priming is
complete. In all cases, seeds are held in a controlled hydrated state for several days
usually at cool temperature (~15o C). However, parameters for optimum seed priming
(hydration level, time in controlled hydrated state, and temperature) are not the same for

S
TE S
all seeds and needs to be determined for each species being primed.

R
AP LS
Primed seeds will usually show higher seed vigor compared to raw seeds. This is
especially noticeable when primed seeds are germinated under less than favorable
C EO
germination environments. For example, it is common to prime lettuce seeds to
overcome germination problems associated with high summer field temperatures
(thermodormacy). Growth substances or biologicals (termed biopriming) can also be
included in the priming solution for added seed enhancement.
E –

In contrast to seed priming, pregermination allows germination to proceed to the point

H

where the emerging radicle cracks the seed coat or the radicle is allowed to emerge a
PL O

few mm beyond the seed coat. Germinated seeds are separated from non-germinated
seeds and then seeds are dried slowly to near their original dry weight. Pregerminated
M SC

seeds were introduced commercially in 1995 for bedding plant species (Impatiens) and
is currently available for only a few high value ornamental crops.
SA NE

The advantages of using pregerminated seeds include: production of 95% or better

usable seedlings; fast, uniform germination; and because the seeds are dry, mechanical
seeders can be used to sow seeds. The fact that these seeds are dry is a major
U

improvement over older technologies to sow hydrated seeds with the radicle exposed in
a protective gel termed fluid drilling. Fluid drilling was not a viable sowing technique
because it was extremely time sensitive and required specialized sowing equipment. Dry
pregerminated seeds have a shelf life of weeks and use current mechanical seeders.

-
-
-

TO ACCESS ALL THE 21 PAGES OF THIS CHAPTER,

Visit: http://www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

Bibliography

General reference
Hartmann H.T., Kester D.E., Davies F.T. Jr. and Geneve R.G. (1997). Plant Propagation: Principles and
Practices. 6th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [This book is a comprehensive discussion of both the
basic and applied aspects of plant propagation. It contains details on many of the subjects covered in this
article]
Seed propagation
Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA). (1983). Seed vigor testing handbook.
Bewley J.D. and Black M. (1994). Seeds: Physiology of development and germination. New York:
Plenum Press. [A comprehensive book on basic physiology of seed development and germination]
Churchill D.B., Cooper T.M. and Carone R.A. (1993). Separation of mixed lots of tall fescue and ryegrass
seed using machine vision. Transactions American Society Agricultural Engineers 35:1383-1386.
[Demonstrates the ability of machine vision to automatically separate seeds with similar physical
characteristics]

S
TE S
Contribution No. 32. Association of Official Seed Analysts. [Describes vigor tests that are currently being

R
used by seed labs]

AP LS
Copeland L.O. and McDonald M.B. (1995). Principles of Seed Science and Technology (3rd edition).
New York: Chapman and Hall. [A comprehensive book on seed testing including seed purity]
C EO
Howarth M.S. and Stanwood P.C. (1993). Measurement of seedling growth rate by machine vision.
Transactions American Society Agricultural Engineers 36:959-963. [This article describes the potential
for using machine vision to evaluate seed vigor]
McDonald M.B. (2000). Seed priming. Seed Technology and its Biological Basis. (ed. M. Black and J.D.
Bewley), pp. 257-286. London, UK: Sheffield Academic Press. [Discusses the current knowledge on seed
E –

priming]
H

McDonald M.B. and Copeland L.O. (1997). Seed Production : Principles and Practices. New York:
PL O

Chapman and Hall. [This book covers basic and applied aspects of seed production]
M SC

Robani, H. (1994). Film-coating horticultural seed. HortTechnology 4:104-105. [A review article on film
coating seeds]
Roos, E.E. (1989). Long-term seed storage. Plant Breeding Reviews (ed. J. Janick). pp. 129–158. Oregon:
Timber Press. [Discusses aspects of germplasm preservation and cryopreservation of seeds]
SA NE

Shadow W. and Carrasco A. (2000). Practical single kernel NIR/visible analysis for small grains. Cereal
Foods World 45:16-18. [Shows the potential for use of machine vision to determine chemical properties
in a single seed]
U

Taylor A.G., Allen P.S., Bennett M.A., Bradford K.J., Burris J.S. and Misra M.K.. (1998). Seed
enhancement. Seed Science Research 8:245-256. [Review article on various seed treatments including
seed coating, priming and pregermination]
TeKrony D.M. and Egli D.B. (1991). Relationship of seed vigor to crop yield: a review. Crop Science
31:816–822. [A review article that discusses the relationship between seed vigor and crop yields]
Warren J.E. and Bennett M.A. (1999). Bio-osmopriming tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seeds
for improved stand establishment. Seed Science Technology 29:489-499. [An example of biopriming—
treating seeds with beneficial biological organisms to protect seedlings from pathogen attack]
Apomixis
Asker S.E. and Jerling L. (1992). Apomixis in Plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [A book covering most
aspects of apomixis]
Van Dijk P. and van Damme J. (2000). Apomixis technology and the paradox of sex. Trends in Plant
Science 5:81-84. [A review article on the basics of apomixis and its potential uses]

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

Cutting Propagation
Altman A.Y. and Waisel Y. (1997). Biology of Root Formation and Development. New York and
London: Plenum Pub. [A collection of review articles on the basic physiology of adventitious root
formation in cuttings]
Chriqui D., Guivarc A., Dewitte W., Prinsen E. and van Onkelen H. (1996). Rol genes and root initiation
and development. Plant and Soil 187:47-55. [A review article discussing the basic biology behind root
induction by Agrobacterium rhizogenes]
Davis T.D., Haissig B.E. and Sankhla N. (1988). Adventitious Root Formation in Cuttings. Oregon:
Dioscorides Press. [A compilation of review articles on fundamental and applied aspects of cutting
propagation]
Falasca G., Reverberi M., Lauri P., Caboni E., de Stradis A. and Altamura M.M. (2000). How
Agrobacterium rhizogenes triggers de novo root formation in a recalcitrant woody plant: an integrated
histological, ultrastructural and molecular analysis. New Phytologist 145:77-93. [A detailed description of
root formation in walnut induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes]
Hackett W.P. (1985). Juvenility, maturation, and rejuvenation in woody plants. Horticultural Reviews

S
TE S
7:109–155. [A comprehensive discussion of the fundamental basis for plant maturation and its impact on
plant propagation]

R
AP LS
Lindroth A.M., Gronroos R., Clapham D., Svensson J. and von Arnold S. (1999). Ubiquitous and tissue-
specific gus expression in transgenic roots conferred by six different promoters in one coniferous and
three angiosperm species. Plant Cell Reports 18:820-828. [An interesting paper showing expression of
C EO
genes thought to be involved with adventitious root formation after cuttings are infected with
Agrobacterium rhizogenes]
Grafting Propagation
Errea P. (1998). Implications of phenolic compounds in graft incompatibility in fruit tree species. Scientia
E –

Horticulturae 74:195-205. [A review article that discusses the evidence for phenolic compounds being
H

associated with compatible grafts]

PL O

Feucht W. (1988). Graft incompatibility of tree crops: an overview of the present scientific status. Acta
Horticulturae 227:33-41. [A discussion of graft compatibility in fruit trees]
M SC

Garner R.J. (1988). The Grafter's Handbook (5th edition). London: Cassell. [This is a classic reference
first printed in 1949. It contains much useful information on grafting including many of the different
techniques]
SA NE

Honma S. (1977). Grafting eggplants. Scientia Horticulturae 7:207-211. [An example of grafted vegetable
propagation to avoid soil-borne disease pests]
Lockard R.G. and G.W. Schneider. (1981). Stock and scion growth relationships and the dwarfing
mechanism in apple. Horticultural Reviews 3:315-375. [A summary discussion of dwarfing understocks
U

for grafting]
Rom R.C. and R.F. Carlson. (1987). Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. New York: John Wiley. [A discussion of
available understocks for fruit tree grafting]
Santamour F.S. Jr. (1989). Cambial peroxidase enzymes related to graft incompatibility in red maple.
Journal of Environmental Horticulture 7:8-14. [This is one of several articles by this author relating
peroxidase isozymes with compatible grafts]
Micropropagation
DeBergh P.C. and Zimmerman R.H. (1991). Micropropagation. Technology and Application. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Pub. [General discussion of the use of micropropagation in commercial propagation]
Donnelly D.J. and Vidaver W.E. (1988). Glossary of plant tissue culture. Portland, Oreg.: Dioscorides
Press. [A comprehensive listing of the terms used in tissue culture]
Etienne-Barry D., Bertrand B, Vasquez N. and Etienne H. (1999). Direct sowing of Coffea arabica
somatic embryos mass-produced in a bioreactor and regeneration of plants. Plant Cell Reports 19:111-
117. [An example of using a bioreactor approach to develop synthetic seeds]

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Plant Propagation - Robert L. Geneve

George E.F. (1993). Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Part I. The technology. Edington, Wilts:
Exegetics Ltd. [Textbook on aspects of tissue culture]
Jain S.M., Gupta P.K. and Newton R.J. (1994). Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Pub. [Compilation of articles on somatic embryogenesis in commercially important
woody perennials]
Kim K.W. and de Hertogh A.A. (1997). Tissue culture of ornamental flowering bulbs (geophytes).
Horticultural Reviews 18:87-169. [Review of micropropagation in flowering bulbs]
Kurata K. and T. Kosai. (1992). Transplant Production Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[Symposium papers that contain information on autotrophic micropropagation]
Merkle, S.A. (1997). Somatic embryogenesis in ornamentals. Biotechnology of Ornamentals. (ed. R.L.
Geneve, J.E. Preece, and S.A. Merkle) Biotechnology Agricultural Series No. 16. Wallingford, UK: CAB
International. [Review article on basic principles of somatic embryogenesis]
Paul H., Kaigny G. and Sangwan-Norreel B.S. (2000). Cryopreservation of apple (Malus x domestica
Borkh.) shoot tips following encapsulation-dehydration or encapsulation-vitrification. Plant Cell Reports
19:768-774. [This article serves as a good example of the technology being proposed for ultra low

S
TE S
temperature germplasm storage of vegetative tissue]
Pierik R.L.M. (1999). In Vitro Culture of Higher Plants.4th ed. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

R
AP LS
[Textbook on micropropagation]
Redenbaugh, K. (1993). Synseeds: Application of Synthetic Seeds to Crop Improvement. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL. [Review of the use of somatic embryos for potential crop production]
C EO
Automation and Robotics
Brown F.R. (1992). Robotics and image analysis applied to micropropagation. Transplant production
systems. (ed. K. Kurata and T. Kosai), pp. 103-115. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[Automation of micropropagation systems]
E –
H

Kurata K. (1992). Transplant production robots in Japan. Transplant production systems. (ed. K. Kurata
and T. Kosai), pp. 103-115. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [A review of robots being
PL O

developed for micropropagation, grafting and seedling transplants]

M SC

Miwa Y. and I. Karube. (1990). Automation of Plant Tissue Culture Process. Automation in
Biotechnology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers. [Robot is described for automating
bulb micropropagation]
Oda M., Okada K., Sasaki H., Akazawa S. and Sei M. (1997). Growth and yield of eggplants grafted by a
SA NE

newly developed robot. HortScience 32:848-849. [An example of robotics for grafting a vegetable crop]
Simonton W. (1991). Robotic end effector for handling greenhouse plant material. Transactions of the
American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34:2615-2621. [Discusses use of machine vision and robotics
for cutting propagation]
U

Simonton W. (1992). Issues in robotic system design for transplant production systems. Transplant
production systems. (ed. K. Kurata and T. Kosai), pp. 103-115. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[discusses greenhouse transplant systems]
Ting K.C. and Giacomelli G.A. (1988). Robot automates plug transplanting. American Vegetable Grower
36:44-46. [Describes use of machines for plug transplanting]

©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)