2024 Technology and Innovation Notes-1
2024 Technology and Innovation Notes-1
2024 Technology and Innovation Notes-1
Morris K. Muketha
BFB 3459: TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
UNIT ONE: INTRODUCTION
Before we delve deeper into this unit let us look at scientific and technological developments that have
fundamentally distinguished the 21st century from the 19th century.
The 21st century has produced innovations such as;
Smartphones and tablets
Drone technology
Electric cars
Self-driving cars
Social media
Fiber optics
3D Printing
Technology and innovation are new areas in management. However, they affect businesses and must
therefore be understood from the management perspective. In the past, the value of a company was
assessed largely on the basis of its capital and physical assets such as land, buildings, equipment, and
inventory. Today, the real value of a company is much more than the value of its physical assets or its
revenue. Technology adds value to the assets of a company.
The role of technology in fostering economic growth of nations and enhancing their industrial
competitiveness has been widely recognized, through its domineering influence over industrial
productivity. Further, technology has emerged as the most important resource that contributes directly to
socio-economic development. Hence, technology is viewed from various perspectives: as an ‘engine for
economic development’, as a ‘strategic resource’, and as a ‘competitive weapon’.
Technological development is becoming very important to all firms competing in global highly
competitive environment. The increasing of customer needs, demand, and expectations and with the
accelerated rates of technological change and development, business owners are becoming more
conscious of the strategic importance of technology in delivering value to their companies and networks
in which they operate. However, adopting new technologies should be aligned with organization’s
vision and strategic goals, and it should support the company’s sustainable development and enhance its
performance.
TECHNOLOGY: DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS
Terms such as ‘technology’, “invention”, “design”, “innovation” and “entrepreneurship” are most times
used interchangeably. In this section we attempt to define these concepts.
Technology
Technology has been defined in a variety of ways. It is important to recognize these various approaches
to the definition before we build one to focus on in this text. This range of definitions demonstrates that
a variety of different perspectives on technology exist. A few of the major definitions of technology
include:
The processes used to change inputs into outputs
The application of knowledge to perform work
The theoretical and practical knowledge, skills, and artifacts that can be used to develop products
as well as their production and delivery system
The technical means people use to improve their surroundings
The application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives; the entire body of
methods and materials used to achieve such objectives.
Technology therefore relates to the design, production and distribution of goods and services in response
to market needs. It is the knowledge, production, processes, tools, and systems used in the creation of
goods or in the provision of services.
Characteristics of technology
Inter-disciplinary
Exists in a historical context-influenced by and influencing culture and society
Uses and produces knowledge
Designed to enhance peoples capabilities and expand human possibilities
Purposeful intervention by design
Invention
An object, process, or technique which displays an element of novelty. Invention is the act of creating
something new and unique. Inventions are irrelevant unless they are put into practice. Once an idea
becomes a reality and economically relevant, it ceases to be an invention and becomes an innovation.
Innovation, invention and creativity
Rubenstein defined innovation as “the process whereby new and improved products, processes,
materials, and services are developed and transferred to a plant and/or market where they are
appropriate. It is therefore broadly thought of as new ideas, new ways of looking at things, new methods
or products that have value.
The ability to generate new and useful ideas is termed creativity. Creativity is defined as the ability to
produce work that is useful and novel. Novel work must be different from work that has been previously
produced and surprising in that it is not simply the next logical step in a series of known solutions.
Innovation contains the idea of output, of actually producing or doing something differently, making
something happen or implementing something new. Innovation almost always involves hard work;
persistence and perseverance are necessary as many good ideas never get followed through and
developed.
Innovation is the entire process by which an organization generates creative new technological ideas
(invention) and converts them into novel, useful and viable commercial products, services, and business
practices for (potential) economic gain.
The initiator of the technology and innovation is an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs are responsible for
creating new products, services, markets and the means through which these products are made, services
produced and markets reached. Entrepreneurs are often responsible for creating new forms of
organization and new ways of managing people. The entrepreneur operates by introducing such changes
directly by having the ability to organize physical information and human resources to bring out
innovation.
The relationship between an entrepreneur and an innovator is that entrepreneurs identify business
opportunities, seize these business opportunities, seek the resources to transform opportunities into
profitable business and the innovator identifies the ideas that are profitable and commercializes the ideas
into practical things, processes, goods and services that can be commercialized and sold to earn profits.
There is therefore a very thin line between an innovator and an entrepreneur.
Technology Transfer
Technology transfer refers to the flow of “hardware” and “software” elements of technology, that is,
equipment, methods, procedures, information, knowledge, skills and know-how, from one individual or
organization to another for economic purposes.
Types of Technology Transfer.
There are many types of technology transfer: horizontal and vertical, internal and external, commercial
and noncommercial, and passive and active.
Horizontal transfer is when established technology is processed from one environment to another, and
its aim is not commercialization but the dissemination of technology and extending its application. It
includes licenses, sale of patents and designs, know-how, industrial cooperation, technical services, joint
ventures, and turnkey contracts. An example of horizontal transfer can be a company that tries to
maximize the return from its technology but is unable to do this by directly selling end products. It
occurs in relations between industrial (the global north) and developing countries (the global South).
There is no improvement of technology unless it is necessary to adapt it to local conditions.
The vertical transfer means moving technology from research to development and production. This
includes progressive stages of invention, innovation, and diffusion, usually by commercialization. The
vertical transfer takes place within one organization or in the transaction between different actors, such
as a research institute and company. Examples include contract research and development, scientific and
technical advice, technical staff movement, and spin-offs.
The internal transfer is based on knowledge existing in the enterprise, which is not documented, and on
results of internal research, as well as on knowledge of company employees and customer relations
management. In contrast, the external transfer includes individuals and inventors, technology
companies, research and development units, joint or cooperative research and development agreements,
research consortiums, higher education institutions, science and technology parks, fairs and economic
missions, Internet databases, and brokerage events.
The commercial transfer is related to the flow of tangible assets in commercial transactions between
different entities. It is also the conversion of scientific and technological knowledge into commercial
products or services. For example, trade in goods, foreign direct investment, licensing agreements, joint
ventures, international subcontracting, turnkey contracts, patents, licensing, spinoffs, cross-licensing,
and strategic supplier agreements. The noncommercial transfer is a movement of knowledge and
capacities from one place or organization to a recipient country, firm, or community. Examples are
capacity building and training, exchange of personnel, technical assistance programs, trade fairs, the
flow of books and journals, movement of persons through immigration, academic exchange, project and
study visits, and collaborative research.
The passive transfer takes place when technology movement is based on the application of a potential
user. It includes only the knowledge, without transferring the skills connected to it (e.g., reports and
manuals). The active transfer is when the provider of the technology assists with its application (e.g.,
demonstration of the technology and training in developing countries), and in semi-active form when a
third-party agency or broker provides the transfer process to the final user.
Technology Transfer Models
The more complex configuration of stages in the interaction between transferor and transferee are
technology transfer models. Usually, such models include the following: (1) proposal and planning,
including a techno-economic analysis to establish the project, including location and preparing a
business case and resources; (2) identification of technologies needed to be transferred; (3) basic
engineering studies, specifying details of the plant to be designed; (4) detailed civil engineering plans,
plant construction, and production startup; (5) selection of local suppliers for equipment and
subcontracting services, adapting the process and product if needed; (6) training and improving local
skills for transferred technology; and (7) providing external support to strengthen the relationship
between sender and recipient. Transfer models show that transferees from developing countries should
be involved at all stages of the process from the beginning; the transfer does not end with the start of
technology usage, and it should be supported with the training of engineering and worker skills.
Factors influencing technology movement can be grouped into four categories: firm specific, industry-
specific, region-specific, and nation-specific. At the company level, barriers and factors of success
include stakeholder awareness of foreign technologies, internationalization and connections with
research institutions, relationships between transferor and recipient, and level of education and
technological capabilities of the workforce. Industry specific factors include the level of market
development and profitability and political and regulatory conditions for the sector. On regional and
national levels, factors include political support for industry, the openness of trade, investment regime,
quality of institutions, business risk, availability of human capital, cultural values and norms, local
needs, and relations between academic, political, and business organizations. Those factors can also be
analyzed as micro and macro-barriers. Micro-barriers can be resolved by transferor and transferee,
whereas macro-barriers need external influence on economic, financial, political, institutional, cultural,
and social contexts. Technology Gap A technology gap between developed and developing countries
influencing world poverty can be reduced by technology transfer. The effective transfer can be
established by engagement, financial and training support of industrialized countries, corporate
responsibility, international organizations, and determination of global south countries' governments. In
the past, programs often failed because of problems such as the selection of technologies from
uncompetitive areas, lack of human capital, lack of engineering studies (e.g., resulting in a large
displacement of people and destruction of agricultural lands), lack of intellectual rights protection, and
investment by companies that are owned and controlled by overseas investors, and thus do not support
the citizens of developing countries.
Technology Life Cycle and Innovation S-Curve
A standout amongst the most famous concepts in Innovation is the Innovation S-Curve, the technology
life cycle. This system, which operates alongside the Bass Model, is used to decide execution in regards
to time and exertion. It assists in deciding the level of development of the industry/item.
As a result, while assessing an item or an industry, it is significant to understand where it is on the S-
curve because of the numerous implications that result out of that such as the possible risks and pitfalls
that are associated for specific phases on it.
Major Phases of Technology Life Cycle
Taking a glance of technology life cycle, we can decipher 4 different stages: Ferment, Takeoff,
Maturity, Discontinuity. Positioning a new industry/ product assists professionals to determine what is
the potential of it and also decide on a certain innovation strategy that will fit best for it.
Era of Ferment: This phase is in the start of the S-Curve example of innovation. It is the point at which
the item/industry is totally new. As a result, a predominant design in the market hasn’t been established
yet. In this manner, the opposition between the various players in the industry is wild. As a result,
usually at this stage most of the resources are spent on research and development.
Takeoff: In this phase, because of the capacity to conquer a noteworthy specialized obstacle or the
capacity to satisfy a request of the market, the item/industry have been embraced by the early greater
part and figured out how to cross the chasm and a predominant design has been established as of now.
Subsequently, the market will be portrayed with a fast development underway, and the item will move
rapidly towards a full market acknowledgment.
Maturity: Here, the item is received almost totally by society and is usually moving toward a physical
point of confinement. Because of the strong rivalry among the real players in the market which is plainly
characterized at this stage, most of the resources now are spent on enhancing the generation processes
and making them less expensive. Thusly, oftentimes the products at this stage turn out to be totally
standardized and the innovations at this stage are considered incremental.
Discontinuity: At this phase the advancement occurs, as another S-Curve example can rise. Since the
previous item/industry reaches an era of maturity, there is an open door for another item to speak to the
innovators segment in the populace and they will start another item life cycle which is usually
considered as the Disruption.
INNOVATION
Goals of Innovation
1) Improved quality
2) Improves productivity
3) 2. Creation of new markets
4) 3. Extension of the product range
5) 4. Reduced labor costs
6) Improved production processes
7) Reduced materials
8) Reduced environmental damage
9) Replacement of products or services
10) Reduced energy consumption
11) Conformance to regulations
12) Improve process and organizational efficiency
13) Increases revenue
14) Increases market share
15) Faster speed to market for products and services
16) Enhances employee engagement and retention
17) Increases customer loyalty
18) Reduce the risk of disruption by competitors
The first goal suggests that the most common reason for organizations to invest in changes to products,
processes, and services is to improve quality. Most of these goals range across improvements to
products, processes, and services and dispel a popular myth that innovation deals mainly with new
product development. Most of the goals could apply to any organization.
Innovation process
The process of innovation can be described in terms of the interactions between four key subprocesses.
•Idea generation
•Opportunity recognition
•Development
•Realization
•Learning
Idea Generation
The first stage in our perspective of the innovation process relates to the creative activity of generating
an opportunistic idea. This stage involves the continuous scanning of the internal and external
environment for threats and opportunities that might be developed into an innovation by the
organization. This stage involves mining the sources of innovation for new ideas and evaluating
solutions to identified problems. An organizational culture that encourages creativity and empowerment
can significantly support this phase of the process. The input typically stems from a technical insight
into a product or process or thoughts about a service. In some cases ideas arise from observed problems
that have occurred in the past or may occur in the future. Ideas can also be stimulated by the goals of the
organization or an unanticipated opportunity. Various stimuli can lead to the creation of an idea and
range from reading magazines and observing problems to visiting other organizations and having
informal discussions with colleagues and customers.
Opportunity Recognition
The second stage of the process is opportunity recognition, in which the opportunity of developing the
idea into a new product, process, or service is assessed and evaluated relative to other opportunities.
This phase of the process involves deciding which innovative ideas will be pursued by the organization
and which are deemed outside its interest. The undertaking of innovative actions is both expensive and
resource intensive for any organization, and even large organizations such as 3M and Intel need to
choose which ideas to pursue. How this decision is made can be complex and involves tradeoffs,
including correlation with the strategic goals and resources available to the organization, the
organization’s current capability, the mix of innovations already being developed, the actions of
competitors, and the emerging signals from the external environment. Similarly, this evaluation of
prospective innovations is not a onetime event but occurs periodically during the innovation process to
ensure that the organization is investing in positive innovations. Cooper (1986) refers to these decision
points as “stage-gates,” where unsuitable initiatives are eliminated to allow extra resources to be
directed toward more suitable innovations. Two types of error can occur at this phase of the process: An
idea that would have been successful for the organization may not be pursued, or an idea that will be
unsuccessful for the organization may be allowed to continue. The more damaging of these errors is the
latter because the development of this idea will consume scarce resources and prevent another beneficial
idea from being developed. In scenarios where a good idea is wrongly abandoned, it is likely that in a
supportive culture, this idea will recur at the idea generation phase. The difficulty in this phase of the
process is that the organization does not have a crystal ball to see into the future and therefore cannot
know for certain which ideas will be winners or losers. Members of the organization can only make the
most enlightened decision they can, based on available knowledge, and continue to periodically screen
their portfolio of developing innovations for appropriateness. As a consequence of this phase, ideas are
often improved, merged with other ideas, or in many cases shelved or abandoned. An important test for
an idea is that it match the goals of the organization and available resources, such as people and money.
Development
If an opportunity is recognized as appropriate for the organization, then the idea moves to a new stage
where it can be developed further. This phase involves the development of the idea or solution into a
potential innovation that is ready for launch to its internal or external market. The development of an
innovation can be highly resource intensive for any organization. The selection of innovations by an
organization is con - strained by the budget and the existing portfolio of innovative actions. Similarly,
certain innovations may require competencies and skills that are scarce or even absent from the
organization, and this scarcity can hinder the implementation of certain innovations. Organizations must
carefully manage the innovative actions, ensuring that they are adequately resourced to ensure success.
Part of managing the implementation of these actions is constant scanning of the external environment
for emerging trends that may alter the trajectory of the innovation. The development phase of the
innovation is usually undertaken as a team approach (because of the diverse competencies needed) and
involves making the initial idea tangible in a form that best meets market demands. Key activities of this
phase can include experimentation, design and development, testing, market analysis, and prototyping.
At the end of the development phase, the initial idea has been developed into a tangible product, process,
or service that the organization views as capable of meeting user needs. Many potential innovations wait
at the end of the development phase for market conditions to be right before they move to the realization
phase.
Realization
This phase of the innovation process relates to the launch to the market, which is where the customer
makes the final evaluation of the innovation. Understanding customer needs is essential to ensure that
the eventual offering to the market meets these needs. A strong alignment between the objectives of the
particular innovation and the needs of the customer increases the likelihood that the innovation’s initial
market adoption will be a success. This fact becomes most pronounced with respect to technology
innovations, where the organization must manage fulfillment of each of the customer segments across
the product life cycle (Moore, 1999). Although Figure 3.1 represents the realization phase as following
the development phase, in reality these phases overlap. Market information about customer needs is an
essential input to the development phase, and information about the innovation’s attributes is necessary
to begin educating and preparing the marketplace. The objective of the realization phase of the process
is to develop an innovation for the market that meets customers’ needs and is readily adopted. When the
organization is developing a process innovation, the market can be said to be internal. Consequently, the
realization phase encompasses activities such as commissioning, validation, and training to facilitate its
successful adoption.
Learning
Learning is the final subprocess in the innovation process. It requires the organization to analyze the
previous phases of the innovation process and identify areas where the process can be improved. In this
way, even innovative actions that are abandoned or end in failure can be beneficial because the
organization can learn from its mistakes and avoid repeating them in the future. Similarly, the new
knowledge acquired from undertaking the prospective innovations can also be used as input to the idea
generation phase that may lead to future innovations. Over time the organization’s effectiveness at
managing its innovation process improves, which will also increase the success of its future innovative
actions.
PRODUCT INNOVATION
It involves new product and new characteristics of old products.
A product innovation is the act of bringing a new to the market place that improves the range and
quality of products on offer
The process that makes them may be much the same but the product has changed incrementally or
radically
Product innovation may be tangible manufactures goods, intangible services, or a combination of the
two.
Tangible product innovation that has had a very significant impact on the way people live and work
are personal computers, mobile phones, and microwave ovens.
Product innovation is a type of innovation that is more noticeable for the consumer and it is related
either to the enhancement of a company’s older products, either to the development of new products
which are based on new technologies or which solve new needs of a consumer
Product innovation occurs as a reaction to multiple factors – for example, a consumer needs are
determined by social, cultural or economic factors, while at a business and organizational level, product
innovation is performed when its purpose is the expansion to new market segments or the attainment of
competitive advantage.
Definition Phase
The what, when, and who of the definition phase set forth the task, timing, and team makeup for the
innovation project. For a process innovation, the task would be to plan the conversion, the timing would
be a time objective with an endpoint with multiple checkpoints, and the team would include a project
manager and team members to coordinate the changeover to the new process. The targets of the
innovation project should emerge from the conceptualization of the project. When setting the objectives
of the project, the project team should make sure the goals are:
1. Specific and well-defined
2. Realistic and doable
3. Timed for achievability
4. Measurable in a realistic manner
5. Agreed on by the team and the management of the firm
6. The person responsible (the project manager) is identified and known to others.
It is also during this stage that the organization is moving beyond looking at what needs to be done, and
identifying what will be done. Therefore, the relevant gap analysis, the results that have spurred the
development of a project team to undertake an innovative activity, and the list of potential alternatives
should be brought together to begin the project records. These records will be instrumental in doing the
post-project evaluation. Recall that part of evaluation is are you where you thought you would be. The
definition stage is also a key place for the organization to ask if this is where it wants to go. After all, it
is after this stage that the escalation of commitment of resources really begins.
Design Phase
During the design phase, the firm begins to decide what it needs to meet the strategic goals, who will be
responsible for the project, and how the process of innovation will take place. The definition phase has
established the targets and standards for the project. The first question in the design phase concerns
feasibility: Can the project be done? If so, the design phase can begin. There are two key types of
individuals who must be on the team if design is to be viable concept generators and concept
implementers. Concept generators throw out ideas about how to solve the problems, and concept
implementers focus on how to accomplish the ideas. In design, it is important to begin with a concept of
the whole and then design components to fit into the whole. The definition phase should give the
innovation team the concept of the whole, and the design phase should fill in the parts.
The individual or individuals in the design phase need to possess three talents:
1. The ability to recognize future trends while contributing to the designs for their firm
2. The ability to recognize the potential commercial significance of their own R&D settings as well as in
other interactions in their life
3. The ability to integrate the commercial and technical worlds. This requires knowledge of what is
possible and what is wanted
Development Phase
The development phase begins the actual effort to implement the innovation. Until now, laying the
groundwork has been the focus. The abstract phase is completed, and now the innovation team needs to
enact the first trial run of the product or process. The more planning and thought that go into design, the
fewer problems should arise during this phase. However, that does not mean everything will go
smoothly. This phase and the next are led by engineering design and manufacturing. The steps in
development are:
1. Define a method for building the product or implementing the process. A prototype should be built
and tested against the design requirements.
2. Evaluate the firm s resources for best practice capabilities. This requires continuous evaluation and
iteration of the design. The goal is to maximize the firm s ability to produce a desirable deliverable
(product or process).
3. Develop a list of materials needed and a design for routing those materials to determine the actual
cost. Until a prototype is built, tested, redesigned, and rebuilt that meets acceptable criteria, the costs are
estimated. Only when there is a clear set of inputs should the vendor-supply chain be determined and
final costs calculated.
4. Determine the ability of the firm to introduce the innovation along with all of the other products and
processes in the firm. Are there synergies with other products and processes? Will the innovation take
away resources needed in other parts of the firm? If the capacity to implement the innovation is
insufficient, then capital resources need to be committed or the product mix needs to be changed.
Newness in one area of the firm can affect a number of other areas. Ideally, managers addressed this
issue earlier, but during the development phase, it will become clearer what is needed for the innovation.
5. Make sure common sense is still the driving force in decision-making. As the prototype is being
developed and tested, the tendency is to become too enthusiastic. This often results in escalation of
commitment without solid reasons and analysis for the decisions.
6. Market for when the capacity to produce the product or process is available. Many times, firms will
announce an innovation, and then the delays in producing it lead people to wonder if it will ever happen.
In the software development industry such delays in meeting the announced release date occurs often,
although it is not a desirable outcome.
7. Determine the required profit margin, market size, and profitability. These need to be part of the
decision before full-scale launch. Too often, firms make a great new product, sell a bunch, and then
wonder why the bottom line does not grow. This is especially true in small entrepreneurial firms. If the
product or process meets the criteria of the definition and design and the costs and returns look good for
launch, then the firm should move to the application phase.
Application Phase
The application phase concerns the installing/releasing the new process or products for the whole
organization. This is the do of the innovation project process. If it is a process innovation, then the
installation of the process should be ready for all parts of the organization that will be making the
change. If the innovation is a new product then the product (and the associated activities) is ready for
full production. As the project team turns over the innovation to the appropriate functions of the firm,
some debugging may need to take place. However, as handover begins, it is important to begin project
closeout. In preparing for the innovation project closeout, several issues are likely to emerge:
1. Burnout or the loss of interest after working the project is common at the end of a project. Because of
burnout, the post-project evaluation is often overlooked. Burnout can also lead team members not to
follow through on debugging. The developers of the innovation have the most knowledge of capabilities
and potential ways to fix problems, and they should remain involved until the processes are running
smoothly.
2. For project team members, concern about what they will be doing next may be distracting. If the team
member knows what the next project will be, then excitement over the newness may cause some neglect
of the application and post-project review phases. If the team member does not know if there is another
assignment or what it will be, anxiety may lead to a failure to focus on finishing the current project.
Because project teams are often cross-functional, there is a loss of social network and work group that
needs to be addressed as the launch takes place.
3. In most projects, bugs (problems) will still exist. This causes frustrations as the developers and
customers try to find solutions. In addition, following the innovation launch there is commonly a
reallocation of resources from the team. If unanticipated bugs arise, then there may be insufficient
budget
and resources to fix them.
4. Documentation for the product needs to be compiled. This compilation of documents will aid in the
evaluation phase. Often, toward the end of the project, the documentation is not as clear because
everyone knows what is happening. However, without the documentation, institutional memory can be
lost.
5. Comparison of goals, definition, and schedules to actual outcomes as the project ends. How closely
does the final product or process match the definition of the project and the design?
6. Contractual commitments finalized with vendors, suppliers, and customers (both internal and
external).
7. The last part of application is to transfer responsibilities to those in the organization who will take
over the innovation project team s outcome. For a new product, for example, the responsibility will
probably move to operations for the manufacturing process. The development of the ongoing
manufacturing process becomes a new innovation project. The documentation of the project team should
be helpful in making this transfer.
Since processes are interrelated, each process should consider its relationships with other processes.
Good business processes always need to be looking forward and require periodic review and revision to
keep up with changes in the internal and external business environments. If a company experiences
massive growth, will the processes still be effective and efficient? If a process is good at supporting 20
customers, does it still work when supporting 200 customers? Some processes cannot be changed
significantly due to a lack of availability of technology and tools. Maybe the steps in the process are not
the problem, perhaps the company tools and technology need to be improved. Companies need to ensure
their processes are built for both present demand and future growth; that processes are scalable.
Lack of a good process can lead to inconsistency, time loss, employee frustration, customer frustration
and dissatisfaction, lost revenue, etc. It is important to have good processes in place and ensure your
staff understand these processes and apply them consistently. Without a good business process
company growth and success are difficult to achieve.
Not only is it important to have processes but it is also equally important that these processes be
effective and efficient in reaching the goal. If the goal is to add a course to your college timetable, then
the process and procedures you follow to do that should help you obtain that goal (effective) and should
do it in a timely and user-friendly way (efficient). When processes are created with these things in
mind, they increase employee effectiveness and efficiency, maintain consistency and quality, and
improve customer satisfaction. Customers continue to shop with a business because of reliability in
product or service quality, price, design, etc. Employees become good at their jobs because they follow
the business process they were given. Once good processes are established at one business location, the
organization can adopt the same processes at multiple locations (just like McDonald’s does).
Cow Path Theory
Cow Path Theory shows a cow zigging and zagging around a tree, fence, and rock to get to the water
supply. Employees follow the Cow Path when they should be creating a new, more efficient path. The
Cow Path Theory is a theory that many organizations have processes they have been following for years
and may not notice that these existing processes may no longer be efficient or effective. Employees may
continue to follow the old, outdated processes because they are used to them and don’t wish to put in the
effort to learn something new, or they don’t feel it is their job to question the processes that have been in
place for many years.
Implement a Process Improvement Plan
Given how process improvements deliver a range of organizational benefits from better communication
to increased profitability, it’s essential to know how to implement a process improvement plan. Listed
below are the steps to do so.
Identify the improvement opportunity. Map the current process. Identify what is not working well.
Obtain stakeholder buy-in. Clarify stakeholders’ roles and degree of involvement with the process
change. Explain the rationale for change.
Design the process improvement plan. Determine the changes required to improve the process and
decide how you will measure the effectiveness of the changes, evaluate any risks, and identify how the
changes will affect the customer experience; for example, introducing a technical solution to streamline
the workflow helps, particularly if the solution automates many of the process steps. Transforming
processes affects an organization to varying degrees depending on the extent of the changes. If the
process improvement is larger than small adjustments affecting a single team, project planning may be
needed with a full project plan incorporating the five project management process groups. This includes
identifying budgets to cover costs like training and any additional resource requirements needed to
execute the changes.
Test the changes. Often when designing new processes, a company might test in a single department at a
single location before implementing the changes in all departments at multiple locations, or before
integrating a new technology system with an old technology system. Take time to test thoroughly and
compile measurable results for analysis. Make adjustments as needed, then when you are sure the new
process works according to plan then you can roll it out across the organization.
Monitor and optimize. Even after thorough testing, process improvements require daily monitoring in
the early weeks of a rollout to catch any issues that may have been missed during the test phase. The
monitoring should compare the results of the improved process against the goals identified at the start of
the project. Collect more feedback from stakeholders and continue to optimize until you have met or
exceeded all benchmarks for the process.
Once a company improves a process, the reality is that it must review the process again in the future.
Business goals, market forces, and new technologies evolve, making established processes and
procedures inefficient or obsolete. Rather than execute a big project whenever a change is required, most
organizations adopt an approach of small, iterative, improvements that happen routinely over time.
Tools and Techniques for Improving Processes
The tools and techniques most commonly used in process improvement are:
• What threats and opportunities are most pressing in the firm’s environment?
• What are the firm’s key strengths and weaknesses?
• Does the firm have any sources of sustainable competitive advantage?
• What are the firm’s core competencies, and what kind of value propositions do those core
competencies offer to customers? How do managers want those value propositions to evolve?
• What key resources and capabilities does the firm need to develop or acquire to meet its long-term
objectives?
A coherent technological innovation strategy both leverages and enhances the firm’s existing
competitive position, and it provides direction for the future development of the firm. Formulating a
technological innovation strategy first requires an accurate appraisal of where the firm is currently. It
then requires articulating an ambitious strategic intent—one that creates a gap between a company’s
existing resources and capabilities and those required to achieve its intent. The ability of the firm to
cohesively leverage all its resources around a unified vision can enable it to create a competitive
advantage that is very difficult for competitors to imitate.
External Analysis
The two most commonly used tools for analyzing the external environment of the firm include Porter’s
five-force model and stakeholder analysis.
Porter’s five-force model entails assessing the degree of existing rivalry, threat of potential entrants,
bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of customers, and threat posed by substitutes. Recently
Porter added a sixth force, the role of complements.
Stakeholder analysis involves identifying any entity with an interest in the firm, what it wants from the
company, and what claims it can make on the company.
Internal Environment
To analyze the internal environment, firms often begin by identifying strengths and weaknesses in each
activity of the value chain. The firm can then identify which strengths have the potential to be a source
of sustainable competitive advantage. The SWOT analysis is used to analyze the internal environment.
Competencies often combine different kinds of abilities, such as abilities in managing the market
interface (e.g., advertising, distribution), building and managing an effective infrastructure (e.g.,
information systems, logistics management), and technological abilities (e.g., applied science, process
design).
Andrews (1971) introduced the concept of core competence and defined it as “what the company can do
particularly well”. A capability that is central to a firm’s value-generating activities.
Prahalad and Hamel (1990), explained that core competencies are the primary competencies that a firm
leverage to compete, although the competencies may often be difficult to identify or overshadowed by
the importance of the firm’s products. Using the analogy of a tree, Prahalad and Hamel explained that
core competencies are like the root system that “provides nourishment, sustenance, and stability”
Distinctive Competence
A capability that is visible to the customer, superior to other firms’ competencies to which it is
compared, and difficult to imitate.
Distinctive competencies help a firm to stand out in its markets when its competencies are superior to its
competitors’ competencies. Firms can accomplish this goal by involving factors such as brand loyalty,
successful technology, causal ambiguity (i.e., difficulty disentangling what the resource is or how it is
created), and economic deterrence.
Technological competence is ability to create and use a particular field of technology effectively, which
is gained through extensive experimentation and learning in its research, development and employment
in production.
Based on his view, he proposed a hierarchical framework that aims to identify and exploit core
competence in a structured manner. The sequence of steps in the Tampoe model is explained as follows.
The identification process starts by establishing the organisation revenue stream and the products and
services it offers. Only those products which make a significant contribution to the organization’s
revenue, profit and strategic targets are determined and selected for analysis. Those candidate products
are then analyzed to identify core products and services which are then further separated into essential
components to determine the basic technologies, people skills, processes and strategic assets that play an
important role to create them. At the end of this stage, the core competences of the organisation become
apparent, as shown in Fig. 2.1. The findings are consequently tested against secondary products and
services to ascertain whether they are generated from the identified core competences and whether there
are new markets in which these skills can be deployed. If, for instance, the test results do not appear
associated with the determined core competences, then they would be potentially subject to divestment
or disposal.
Strategic Intent
A firm’s purpose is to create value. This entails more than just improving operations or cutting costs; it
means leveraging corporate resources to create more performance for customers, more well-being for
employees, and more returns for shareholders. This is accomplished through developing new businesses
and markets, and leveraging corporate resources, all guided by the firm’s strategic intent. A company’s
strategic intent is a long-term goal that is ambitious, builds upon and stretches the firm’s existing core
competencies, and draws from all levels of the organization.
Once the firm articulates its strategic intent, managers should identify the resources and capabilities that
the firm must develop or acquire to achieve its strategic intent.
The US National Task Force on Technology has listed five specific reasons individuals and
organizations should be concerned about the management of technology.
1. The rapid pace of technological change demands a cross discipline approach if economic
development is to occur in an effective and efficient manner to take advantage of technological
opportunities.
2. The rapid pace of technological development and the increasing sophistication of consumers have
shortened product life cycles. The result of these factors is a need for organizations to be more proactive
in the management of technology.
3. There is a need to cut product development times as well as to develop more flexibility in
organizations. The lead-time from idea to market is being reduced by the emergence of new or
altered technologies.
4. Increasing international competition demands that organizations must maximize competitiveness by
effectively using new technologies.
5. As technology changes, the tools of management must change, but the process of determining what
those new tools should be is in its infancy.
In Kenya, technology and innovation is controlled by the science, technology and innovation act, 2013,
which establishes the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NCSTI).
The functions of the Commission are to—
(a) develop, in consultation with stakeholders, the priorities in scientific, technological and innovation
activities in Kenya in relation to the economic and social policies of the Government, and the country’s
international commitments;
(b) lead inter-agency efforts to implement sound policies and budgets, working in collaboration with the
county governments, and organizations involved in science and technology and innovation within Kenya
and outside Kenya;
(c) advise the national and county governments on the science, technology and innovation policy,
including general planning and assessment of the necessary financial resources;
(d) liaise with the National Innovation Agency and the National Research Fund to ensure funding and
implementation of prioritized research programmes;
(e) ensure co-ordination and co-operation between the various agencies involved in science, technology
and innovation;
(f) accredit research institutes and approve all Scientific research in Kenya;
(g) assure relevance and quality of science, technology and innovation programmes in research
institutes;
(h) advise on science education and innovation at both basic and advanced levels;
(i) in consultation with the National Research Fund Trustees, sponsor national scientific and academic
conferences it considers appropriate;
(j) advise the Government on policies and any issue relating to scientific research systems;
(k) promote increased awareness, knowledge and information of research system;
(l) co-ordinate, monitor and evaluate, as appropriate, activities relating to scientific research and
technology development;
(m) promote and encourage private sector involvement in scientific research and innovation and
development;
(n) annually, review the progress in scientific research systems and submit a report of its findings and
recommendations to the Cabinet Secretary;
(o) promote the adoption and application of scientific and technological knowledge and information
necessary in attaining national development goals;
(p) develop and enforce codes, guidelines and regulations in accordance with the policy determined
under this Act for the governance, management and maintenance of standards and quality in research
systems; and
(q) undertake, or cause to be undertaken, regular inspections, monitoring and evaluation of research
institutions to ensure compliance with set standards and guidelines.
The Art of High Technology Management
Outstanding high-technology firms tend to score high in most of the six categories below, while less
successful ones usually score low in several. The categories include;
1) Business focus;
Many leaders in high-technology fields, such as computers, aerospace, semiconductors, biotechnology,
chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, electronic instruments, and duplicating machines, realize the great bulk of
their sales either from a single product line or from a closely related set of product lines.
When the company grows and establishes a secondary product line, it is usually closely related to the
first.
Another policy that strengthens the focus of leading high-technology firms is concentrating R&D on one
or two areas. Such a strategy enables these businesses to dominate the research, particularly the more
risky, leading-edge explorations.
Another other way that a company demonstrates a strong business focus is through consistency in the set
of priorities and a pattern of behavior that is continually reinforced by top management.
(2) Adaptability
Successful firms balance a well-defined business focus with the willingness, and the will, to undertake
ajor and rapid change when necessary. Concentration, in short, does not mean stagnation. Immobility is
the most dangerous behavioral pattern a high-technology firm can develop: technology can change
rapidly, and with it the markets and customers served. Therefore, a high-technology firm must be able to
track and exploit the rapid shifts and twists in market boundaries as they are redefined by new
technological, market, and competitive developments.
To undertake such wrenching shifts in direction requires both agility and daring. Organizational agility
seems to be associated with organizational flexibility — frequent realignments of people and
responsibilities as the firm attempts to maintain its balance on shifting competitive sands.
(3) organizational cohesion
The key to success for a high-tech firm is not simply periodic renewal. There must also be cooperation
in the translation of new ideas into new products and processes. As Ken Fisher, the architect of Prime
Computer’s extraordinary growth, puts it, “If you have the driving function, the most important success
factor is the ability to integrate. It’s also the most difficult part of the task.”
To succeed, the energy and creativity of the whole organization must be tapped. Anything that restricts
the flow of ideas, or undermines the trust, respect, and sense of a commonality of purpose among
individuals is a potential danger. This is why high-tech firms fight so vigorously against the usual
organizational accoutrements of seniority, rank, and functional specialization. Little attention is given to
organizational charts: often they don’t exist.
Younger people in a rapidly evolving technological field are often as good — and sometimes even better
— a source of new ideas as are older ones. In some high-tech firms, in fact, the notion of a “halflife of
knowledge” is used; that is, the amount of time that has to elapse before half of what one knows is
obsolete.
Communication is key in improving cohesion In high-tech organizations. One way to combat the
development of such distance is by making top executives more visible and accessible.
A policy of conscious job rotation also facilitates this sense of communal-ity. In the small firm,
everyone is involved in everyone else’s job: specialization tends to creep in as size increases and
boundary lines between functions appear. If left unchecked, these boundaries can become rigid and
impermeable. Rotating managers in temporary assignments across these boundaries helps keep the lines
fluid and informal, however.
(4) Entrepreneurial culture
While continuously striving to pull the organization together, successful high-tech firms also display
fierce activism in promoting internal agents of change. Indeed, it has long been recognized that one of
the most important characteristics of a successful high-technology firm is an entrepreneurial culture.
(5) Sense of integrity
Successful high-tech firms tend to exhibit a commitment to long-term relationships. The firms view
themselves as part of an enduring community that includes employees, stockholders, customers,
suppliers, and local communities: their objective is to maintain stable associations with all of these
interest groups.
Although these firms have clear-cut business objectives, such as growth, profits, and market share, they
consider them subordinate to higher order ethical values. Honesty, fairness, and openness — that is,
integrity — are not to be sacrificed for short-term gain. Such companies don’t knowingly promise what
they can’t deliver to customers, stockholders, or employees. They don’t misrepresent company plans and
performance. They tend to be tough but forthright competitors. This commitment to ethical values must
start at the top, otherwise it is ineffective.
(6) “Hands-on” top management.
CEOs of successful high-technology firms are usually actively involved in the innovation process to
such an extent that they are sometimes accused of meddling. Good high-tech managers not only
understand how organizations, and in particular engineers, work, they understand the fundamentals of
their technology and can interact directly with their people about it. This does not imply that it is
necessary for the senior managers of such firms to be technologists (although they usually are in the
early stages of growth). What appears to be more important is the ability to ask lots of questions, even
“dumb” questions, and dogged patience in order to understand in-depth such core questions as: (a) how
the technology works; (b) its limits, as well as its potential (together with the limits and potential of
competitors’ technologies); (c) what these various technologies require in terms of technical and
economic resources; (d) the direction and speed of change; and (e) the available technological options,
their cost, probability of failure, and potential benefits if they prove successful.