National Mathematics Policy Guidelines 2013
National Mathematics Policy Guidelines 2013
National Mathematics Policy Guidelines 2013
National
Mathematics
Policy
Guidelines
(September 3, 2013)
1
CONTENTS
2
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The unsatisfactory performance of students in mathematics and the low levels of numeracy
exhibited by students and graduates of the Jamaican educational system has been a cause of
much concern for stakeholders in education and in the private and public sectors. The impact of
this current trend is significant as Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
has become the driving force of emerging job markets. With less than 20% of a given secondary
cohort leaving the formal education system with mathematics qualifications, there is a small
percentage of the population able to access the opportunities which are and will become
available in the coming years.
In response to what is clearly a crisis, the Government of Jamaica is seeking to improve the
standard of mathematics education in an attempt to raise the levels of numeracy and attainment
in mathematics of all students in Jamaica. In so doing the National Mathematics Policy has been
developed.
In an attempt to address the issue of teacher quality, the policy outlines clear standards for
mathematics teacher education in Jamaica.
While the Policy outlines a framework for implementation, monitoring and evaluation, details
are provided in the guidelines and standards which accompany the document and in the National
Strategic Plan which will be published separately.
4
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
RATIONALE
The concepts and principles embedded within mathematics underpin several activities in which
we are engaged on a day to day basis – weather prediction, banking, interpreting data, analysing
trends – to name a few. In order for a country to reap positive benefits from the outcomes of
mathematics teaching, its citizenry should be able to engage in these activities with confidence
and with more than a transactional understanding of these concepts and principles.
In Jamaica, however, there is the concern that an insufficient number of persons in the society
are equipped with the skills and understandings required to function effectively in life after
school and are unable to apply the mathematics they have learnt in a meaningful way and in
unfamiliar contexts. The lack of mathematical understanding has been, too often, reflected in the
unsatisfactory performance of students of Mathematics at all levels of the education system. Poor
attitudes to the subject are also very evident among many students, and some view mathematics
as being of little use to them outside of school. . Understandably, there are several factors which
contribute to this situation, but, the fact that there are no commonly agreed aims and objectives
for mathematics education in Jamaica, has only served to exacerbate the problem.
Experiences provided in the mathematics classroom should be geared towards the development
of skills which enable not only meaningful use of the ideas learnt, but also the development of
problem solving and critical thinking skills. This cannot be achieved, however, unless focus is
placed on the quality of mathematics teaching. As such, attention must be paid to producing
teachers of the highest quality and to ensuring that the product of mathematics education meets
the standards and expectations set.
The National Mathematics Policy seeks to outline principles, and define standards for the
teaching and learning of mathematics in Jamaica in order to improve the quality of
a) teachers of mathematics and
b) mathematics teaching at all levels of the education system.
As Jamaica strives to take its place within a fiercely competitive and highly globalized
marketplace, its school graduates must be equipped with the requisite mathematical knowledge
needed, and must, too, possess reasoning, problem solving and critical thinking skills if they are
to support national development and if they are to access the kinds of jobs that are emerging and
compete internationally. .
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Table 1 which shows data generated from the assessment of students in the Grade 3 Diagnostic
Test between 2003 and 2011, demonstrates the less than satisfactory performance of students at
that level.
Table 1 (below), shows statistics on performance for the period 2002 to 2012 in the Grade 3
Mathematics Diagnostic Test
5
Table 1 Grade Three Diagnostic Test Mastery by Strand
The test which assesses mastery of concepts developed in the Grade 1 – 3 curriculum consists
mainly of items designed to evaluate knowledge of, and competence in, using number related
concepts. Examination of the data indicates low levels of mastery across all five strands of the
curriculum, with particularly low levels in number.
In 2003, only 16.4% of the grade 3 cohort was able to attain mastery in Number - a rate which
increased to 49.6% in 2011.
As shown in Table 2, the Low levels of performance continued in Grade 4 with less than 50% of
a given cohort attaining mastery on the Grade 4 Numeracy Test.
6
Table 3 Mastery Levels per Strand (2011) Grade 4 Numeracy Test
STRAND PERCENTAGE
MASTERY
Number Representation 58.2
Number Operation 45.3
Measurement 69.3
Geometry 75.3
Algebra 54.5
Statistics 47.0
Source: Student Assessment Unit, MOE, Kingston, Jamaica
A closer analysis of the 2011 results show that that the levels of mastery, particularly in the
Number Strands, remain unsatisfactory with less than 50% of the cohort being able to master
number operation and statistics.
The Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT) was introduced to the Jamaican education system in
1999. Table 4 shows the national average for the period 2002 – 2012, data which indicates that
over the years there has been sustained improvement in the performance of students on the test.
Despite the increase, current levels of attain continue to be relatively low, with a national
average for 2012 of 63%. It is important to note that a contributing factor to the 6% increase seen
between 2010 and 2011 was no doubt as a result of the implementation of the Competence Based
Transition Policy which saw more than 6,000 students not being allowed to sit the 2010 GSAT
examinations because they had failed to attain mastery in the Grade 4 Literacy Test.
YEAR NATIONAL
AVERAGE GSAT
2002 51
2003 48
2004 44
2005 58
2006 53
2007 46
2008 55
2009 53
2010 57
2011 62
2012 63
Source: Student Assessment Unit, MOE, Kingston, Jamaica
7
The Caribbean Examinations Council‟s CSEC Mathematics Examination is the main means of
assessing mathematical knowledge normally at the end of five years of secondary education in
Jamaica.
An analysis of the data for the period 2001 – 2011 shows that while 23 – 45% of a given sitting
cohort was able to attain Grades 1 – 3 Proficiency in the examination during the period, this
represents only between 10 and 21% of the given age cohort.
Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Eligible Cohort 36,560 36,830 39,491 35,720 36,969 39,038 40,037 39,155 42,108 44,842 43,497
%age attaining
Grades 1-3 as 17
%age of
Cohort 13 16 15 10 17 17 16 21 19 21 19
Sitting 16,376 16,176 16,795 15,362 15,635 18,153 18,606 18,758 19,990 20,742 20,850
Awards 4,741 5,849 6,086 3,609 6,195 6,581 6,599 8,103 8,185 9,271 8,318
%age attaining
Grades 1-3 37%
%age of Total
Sitting 29% 36% 36% 23% 40% 36% 35% 43% 41% 45% 40%
Even while the statistics on these specific examinations, taken as a whole, is an indicator of a
serious problem with respect to the teaching and learning of mathematics in Jamaica, the annual
reports of the Caribbean Examinations Council consistently point out that generally, candidates
neither demonstrate basic mathematical skills nor good reasoning and problem solving skills, and
refer to a lack of conceptual understanding amongst the candidates particularly as it relates to
basic or foundation concepts. (June 2012 CSEC Mathematics Examiners Report)
The implications to the nation of consistently poor performance in mathematics are far-reaching
and significant. Not only is it important that Jamaica produces good mathematicians in order that
they may fit key roles in society, but it is also vital that persons who emerge from the school
system – at whatever level – are equipped with basic numeracy skills in order that they may be
empowered to participate equitably, effectively and efficiently in the wider society. Indeed,
literacy and numeracy skills are requisites for successful participation in society in the 21st
century and the structures of education must be seen to contribute to the development of such
skills.
The National Mathematics Policy is focused on establishing principles and standards to guide the
teaching and learning of mathematics in Jamaica, in the hope that this will impact on the levels
of performance and the numeracy skills of students at the early childhood, primary and
secondary levels of the system. The Policy also outlines requirements for the training of
mathematics teachers.
8
THE POLICY
2.1 VISION
The National Mathematics Policy acknowledges the importance of developing Numeracy, that is,
the use of mathematics both as a natural tool throughout the curriculum, and one to be used in
everyday life. As a result the policy seeks to establish standards to guide
improve quality and competence of mathematics educators
improved teaching and learning of mathematics
development of standards and guidelines to support teaching and learning of mathematics
For the purposes of this Policy, „Numeracy” and “Mathematical Literacy” will be used
interchangeably. The definition to be adopted will be one that is now internationally accepted,
and which has been articulated by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)i.
“ Mathematical literacy is the capacity to identify and understand the role that mathematics plays
in the world, make well-founded judgments, and use and engage with mathematics in ways that
meet the needs of one‟s life as a constructive, concerned and reflective citizen.”
The ability to apply numbers to a range of mathematical skills and processes in order to
solve problems in everyday life.
In recognition of the important role that mathematics plays, the MOE has determined that
mathematics lessons should be focused on facilitating the development of
conceptual understanding
computational fluency and
problem solving skills
These goals will be operationalized in the classroom through the use of appropriate teaching
methodologies which are underpinned by the notion of constructivism and which focus on
understanding and the development of skills and processes rather than number crunching and the
memorization of facts and formulae.
11
2.3.2 Planning for Instruction
Every mathematics lesson must be guided by an individual lesson plan and must provide
opportunities for students to:
Be engaged
Explain
Explore
Elaborate
Evaluate
2.3.3 Assessment
Assessment in mathematics must not be restricted to traditional summative styles such as end-of-
term/end-of-year tests. Rather, assessment must be an integral part of teaching and must be used
to support the learning process. This means that any assessment strategy used by the teacher
must provide useful information to teachers, students and parents
The position of the Ministry of Education therefore is that assessment in mathematics will
focus on the learners’ understandings as well as their procedural skills. It must be used
both to diagnose the nature and causes of barriers to learning and to monitor the progress
of learning and teaching so as to improve learning.
In addition to the opportunities for continuous assessment which should be used by the school
throughout the delivery of the formal curriculum, the Ministry of Education will spearhead
national assessments in mathematics at vital stages of students‟ educational cycle.
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 4
Grade 6
Grade 9
Grade 11
12
as it relates to numeracy development for each cohort of students. This approach should also be
taken with the Grade 2 Diagnostic Test which should be administered at the end of Grade 2.
Grade 4 – At this stage students have covered four years of mathematics instructions in the
primary school system. Though teachers are conducting their own assessment it is necessary to
obtain information on students‟ performance on a national level so as to plan for instructions.
The instrument administered at this stage will be the first nationally administered test designed to
evaluate student‟s numeracy development.
Grade 6 – At the end of Grade 6 students prepare to transition from primary to secondary
education. This becomes another crucial stage to assess the progress. It is recommended that
schools receiving students in Grade 7 administer a diagnostic test to evaluate the mastery of
concepts which are critical to the students ability to successfully access the Grade 7 curriculum.
Items should be designed to support the identification of common errors and misconceptions.
Secondary
Grade 9 – It is important at this stage to find out what students know as they prepare make
crucial decisions about selection of subjects that tends closer to career choices.
Grade 11 - A national assessment is required as students should be certified nationally when they
terminate the secondary level.
It is critical that assessment be used to not just evaluate student performance, but to guide
and inform instruction. As a result, school leadership should ensure that data generated
from the administration of assessment tools is carefully scrutinised, common errors and
misconceptions identified and the information used to plan relevant remedial programmes.
Assessment must
reflect the mathematics that pupils should know and be able to do;
engage students in tasks that involve problem solving, reasoning and communication
(both written and oral);
provide opportunities for pupils to demonstrate their application of mathematics to real
world situations;
facilitate creative thought through the use of problems which hold the possibility for
alternative solutions.
In order to accomplish this, teachers must use a range of sources to provide information, utilizing
both formal and informal methods. Paper-and-pencil tests are only one source of such
information, and by themselves are limiting and inadequate in describing fully a student‟s
knowledge and understanding of mathematics. Others sources which may be utilized include:
Observation
Listening to pupils
Use of games
Questioning
Portfolios
13
Journals
Projects
The instrument developed for administration at the end of Grade 11, should be an achievement
instrument designed to evaluate what students should know and be able to do based on the
national curriculum and will, in addition to measuring mathematical competency, will also
measure the extent to which students have attained an appropriate level of mathematical literacy.
All students in Grade 11 must sit the Grade 11 assessment whether or not they are registered to
sit the CSEC mathematics examination.
Grades 12 – 13, Community Colleges, Colleges and Universities and other professional
organisations will develop their own mathematics programme with support from the Ministry of
Education.
2.3.4 Reporting
Schools will develop reporting procedures in order to provide feedback to parents, students and
the Ministry of Education, in order to track the level of numeracy throughout the school life of
students. Student learning outcome targets for each year will be established and used as criteria
for assessment.
In order to ensure that students are given the opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills and
competences which are facilitated through the curriculum, adequate contact hours for
mathematics instruction must be provided for in the school timetable.
In the context of the Primary Curriculum, teachers are expected to take advantage of the
opportunity to integrate mathematics-related ideas in the integrated lesson. However, time must
be provided each day for focus on the development of numeracy skills.
At the Early Childhood (ages 3 – 5), a MINIMUM of 25 – 30 minutes per day is to be focused on
the development of numeracy skills during the guided learning sessions.
For students in Grades 1 – 3 (Lower primary) and Grades 4 - 6, the time for discrete instruction
in mathematics is to be no less than 1 hour per day.
2.3.5.2 Secondary
All secondary schools should provide a minimum of 240 minutes dedicated to the teaching and
learning of mathematics and numeracy per 5-day week for students in Grades 7 - 11. This must
include at least 4 separate sessions of teacher contact per week. In addition, adequate time will be
14
provided to complete the mathematics syllabuses for local, regional and international
examinations.
While the courses are designed specifically to explore mathematical concepts, the courses should
not be delivered as lectures but should be delivered using a methodology which requires the
lecturer to employ methodologies which
a) allow for the development of concepts (prospective teachers must master the
content at least 2 grade levels above which they are being prepared to teach)
b) appreciate the concepts behind traditional and emerging algorithms and those
which students may invent
c) provide an opportunity to identify and make connections within and across
strands
d) explore the application of the related mathematical ideas to real life contexts
and other disciplines
e) provide an opportunity for participants to share their ideas for problem solving
and elicit their reasoning
f) explore common misconceptions, errors and overgeneralisations
g) support prospective teachers in developing the habits of mind of a
mathematical thinker - the ability to identify patterns, reason, prove. Students
should be engaged so that they learn to look at problems from multiple angles
Teacher educators must therefore ensure that they model best practices by engaging their student
teachers in the exploration of the related concepts and by consistently linking the concepts to real
world contexts. It is also critical that courses are developed to provide prospective teachers with
opportunities to integrate the use of ICT technologies in the design and delivery of mathematics
lessons.
Each teacher education institution should have adequate systems in place to manage student data.
Regulations should be developed (in accordance with international standards) to manage students
who are consistently failing to perform in core courses. It is critical however that for students to
be assessed as having passed a course, students should be required to attain a pass in BOTH
course work and the final examination.
15
2.4 STANDARDS
Persons who pursue a programme with Mathematics education as a minor (or a minimum
of 21 credit hours in mathematics/mathematics education should only be allowed to teach
to Grade 9
Teachers who do not possess the new minimum requirement of a First Degree but have a
Diploma in Secondary Education (Single Option Mathematics) should only be allowed to teach
up to Grade 9 while those who pursued with a Double Option Mathematics Diploma may be
allowed to teach to Grade 11
Mathematics teaching at all levels of the education system should be designed to support
students in developing conceptual understanding, critical thinking and problem solving skills.
The curriculum and the teaching approach together should be designed to help students develop:
In order for the Jamaican education system to produce students with the characteristics outlined
in section…, it is critical that its classrooms be furnished with teachers of mathematics at both
the primary and secondary levels who demonstrate
a) A positive attitude towards the subject from a personal and professional perspective
b) A sound understanding of the mathematical content needed to teach at the level to which
they are assigned
c) the Knowledge and expertise required to use the most effective methods to teach the
content
It is therefore imperative that persons certified to teach mathematics in the Jamaican education
system be graduates of teacher education programmes with a focus on mathematics education,
and meeting requirements stated in this Policy.
Teacher training programmes are expected to adequately prepare teachers to teach mathematics
in ways articulated in this Policy.
17
2.4.4.1 Matriculation
Each institution is required to ensure that gaps identified are addressed before students are
allowed to graduate.
The programme of study should provide all candidates with the opportunity to explore concepts
which they will be required to teach from the relevant curriculum using a suite of methodologies.
The teacher-in-training must experience mathematics in ways which will enable them to provide
18
the appropriate environment for their own students once they enter the system. As such, teacher
training programmes in mathematics education should also allow the teacher-in-training to:
be engaged
explore
explain
elaborate and
evaluate
Courses included in the programme should adequately address concepts which prospective
teachers will be required to teach. While teaching of content is critical, the mathematical
education programme should see a seamless synergy between content and methodology.
Teacher educators should model the methodologies being espoused. The teacher education
programme should therefore support the prospective teacher in developing the knowledge, skills
and competences relating to effective strategies for developing the related concepts
PROGRAMME COURSES
Early Childhood Number
Early Years Geometry and Measurement
(3 – 5 years) Pedagogy
Early Childhood Number
Early – Grades Geometry and Measurement
(1 – 3) Algebraic Thinking and Using Data
Pedagogy
Primary Mathematics 4 – 6 Number
Geometry
Measurement
Algebra and Data
Pedagogy
Secondary 7 – 11 Number Theory
Algebra 1 and 2
Geometry
Trigonometry
Measurement
Functions
Calculus 1
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Secondary 7 – 13 All of the above in addition to
Calculus 2
Introductory Analysis
Linear Algebra
Discrete Mathematics and Computer Science
In managing the practicum experience, teacher training institutions must ensure that
opportunities are provided for the student teacher to make connections between theory and
practice particularly as it relates to the teaching and learning of mathematics. Carefully selected
mentors should be identified within the context to which the student has been identified.
ALL primary and early childhood student teachers, must be observed teaching mathematics by a
mathematics specialist during the penultimate practicum experience. The grade obtained from
this exercise must be used in calculating the final grade for the practicum experience.
Teachers-in-training must be seen at least three times during their Practicum assignment by
mathematics education specialist.
The Government of Jamaica will provide the human and material resources, facilitating the
process by securing for the system:
teachers, who satisfy the minimum qualification requirements in all schools;
teachers trained in mathematics/numeracy at appropriate levels in all schools;
adequate classroom space to avoid overcrowding and noise levels which inhibit
mathematics learning;
Schools and school boards will study the policy and implement it, and
implement the relevant elements within their institutional contexts;
promote mathematics and numeracy development of pupils;
Parents and Community will gain an understanding of the policy with a view to supporting it and
take active roles in the mathematics and numeracy development of their children.
3.7 Learners
22
The National Mathematics and Numeracy Policy is linked to and supported by
The National Curriculum Policy
The ICT in Education Policy
The National Assessment Programme and
The National Comprehensive Numeracy Programme
Implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the National Mathematics and Numeracy Policy
should be guided by a rolling strategic plan developed to outline strategies which will be used by
the Ministry of Education. Oversight for the implementation of the plan should be managed by a
National Mathematics Working Group and supported by the following sub-committees
a) Regional Mathematics Committee
b) Mathematics Professional Development Committee
c) Mathematics Initial Teacher Education Committee
d) Public Education and Marketing Committee
e) Gender issues in Mathematics Education
The Policy will be subject to review and revision at the end of every five years, or at any earlier
time as deemed necessary by the Ministry of Education. The review is to be initiated by the
Chief Education Officer and supported by the relevant units.
23
The National Mathematics Policy was first drafted in 2003 by Dr Camille Bell-Hutchinson then a
lecturer in the Department of Educational Studies, UWI, Mona. This followed an extended
period of consultation and input from the public and private sector. The original project team
comprised:
Ms Patricia Johnson, Miss Patt Flett, Mr Aldin Bellinfantie, Mrs Rosalyn Kelly, Mrs Lorna
Thompson, Mr Derrick Hall and Mrs Janice Steele.
.
This revised policy document is the result of a review of current practice and international
standards. The Review process was led by Dr. Tamika Benjamin, National Mathematics
Coordinator, at the Ministry of Education and benefited from contributions from:
Mrs Rosalyn Kelly Retired Senior Education Officer, Core Curriculum Unit
Mr Derrick Hall Senior Education Officer, Core Curriculum Unit
Mrs Novlet Plunkett Head Department of Mathematics Mico University College
Dr Donna Powell – Wilson Head Mathematics Department, Shortwood Teachers‟
College
Dr Camella Buddoo Lecturer, Mathematics Education, School of Education
Dr Byron Buckley
Ms Nicolette Deer
Dr Camille Bell-Hutchinson, Mathematics Educator, and currently the Campus Registrar at The
University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, acted as Consultant to the team and was
responsible for the production of the final draft of the Policy.
The team also received support from Mrs. Maxine Henry-Wilson ( JTEC), Mr. Maurice Smith
(Technical Assistant to the Chief Education Officer) and members of the Policy Analysis
Research and Statistics Unit in the Planning and Development Division of the Ministry of
Education.
24