NDI 0013 - Guidelines For Loadouts
NDI 0013 - Guidelines For Loadouts
NDI 0013 - Guidelines For Loadouts
0013/ND
www.gl-nobledenton.com
GUIDELINES FOR LOADOUTS
PREFACE
This document has been drawn with care to address what are likely to be the main concerns based on the
experience of the GL Noble Denton organisation. This should not, however, be taken to mean that this document
deals comprehensively with all of the concerns which will need to be addressed or even, where a particular matter is
addressed, that this document sets out the definitive view of the organisation for all situations. In using this
document, it should be treated as giving guidelines for sound and prudent practice on which our advice should be
based, but guidelines should be reviewed in each particular case by the responsible person in each project to ensure
that the particular circumstances of that project are addressed in a way which is adequate and appropriate to ensure
that the overall advice given is sound and comprehensive.
Whilst great care and reasonable precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document to ensure that the
content is correct and error free, no responsibility or liability can be accepted by GL Noble Denton for any damage or
loss incurred resulting from the use of the information contained herein.
CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.
1 SUMMARY 4
2 INTRODUCTION 5
2.1 SCOPE 5
2.2 REVISIONS 5
2.3 DOWNLOADS 7
3 DEFINITIONS 8
4 THE APPROVAL PROCESS 10
4.1 GL NOBLE DENTON APPROVAL 10
4.2 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL 10
4.3 SCOPE OF WORK LEADING TO AN APPROVAL 10
4.4 LIMITATION OF APPROVAL 10
4.5 SAFETY DURING LOADOUT 11
5 CLASSES OF LOADOUT 12
6 STRUCTURE TO BE LOADED 13
6.1 DESIGN 13
6.2 WEIGHT CONTROL 14
7 SITE AND QUAY 15
7.1 SITE CAPACITY 15
7.2 MARINE ASPECTS 15
7.3 LOADOUT PATH 15
8 BARGE 16
8.1 CLASS 16
8.2 STABILITY 16
9 LINK BEAMS, SKIDWAYS AND SKIDSHOES 17
10 MOORINGS 18
11 GROUNDED LOADOUTS 19
12 PUMPING AND BALLASTING 20
13 LOADOUTS BY TRAILERS, SPMTS OR HYDRAULIC SKID-SHOES 22
13.1 STRUCTURAL CAPACITY 22
13.2 LOAD EQUALISATION & STABILITY 22
13.3 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT 22
13.4 SKIDSHOES 22
14 PROPULSION SYSTEM DESIGN, REDUNDANCY AND BACK-UP 23
15 LIFTED LOADOUTS 26
16 TRANSVERSE LOADOUTS 27
17 BARGE REINSTATEMENT AND SEAFASTENINGS 28
18 TUGS 29
19 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATION 30
REFERENCES 31
APPENDIX A - CHECK LIST OF INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL 32
TABLES
Table 5-1 Loadout classes 12
Table 12-1 Required Pump Capacity 20
Table 12-2 Example of required pumping capacity calculation 21
Table 14-1 Propulsion System Design 24
Table 14-2 Typical Friction Coefficients 25
1 SUMMARY
1.1 These Guidelines have been developed for the loadout of items including offshore jackets, SPAR
sections, modules, bridges and components from the shore onto floating or grounded barges and
ships.
1.2 The principles of these Guidelines can also be applied to the load-in of structures onto the shore from
a floating vessel/barge.
1.3 This document supersedes the previous revision, document no 0013/NDI Rev 4 dated 19 Jan 2009. A
5
summary of the principal changes is given in Section 2.2.4.
1.4 These Guidelines are intended to lead to an approval by GL Noble Denton, which may be sought
where an operation is the subject of an insurance warranty, or where an independent third party review
is required.
1.5 A description of the Approval Process is included, for those projects which are the subject of an
insurance warranty.
1.6 This document includes the requirements for consideration, intended to represent sound practice, for
the structure to be loaded, loadout site, link beams and skidways, trailers, pumping and ballasting,
jacking systems and winches, grounded loadouts, transverse loadouts, moorings, seafastenings, tugs
and weather forecasts.
1.7 Methods for lifted loadouts are derived from GL Noble Denton’s lifting Guideline document –
Guidelines for Marine Lifting Operations [Ref. 1].
1.8 Check lists are appended, to act as a guide to information required.
2 INTRODUCTION
2.1 SCOPE
2.1.1 This document refers to the transfer of a cargo onto a barge or vessel by horizontal movement or by
lifting. including structures such as jackets, SPAR sections, modules, topside components and bridges.
It contains general recommendations and checklists of information required to allow approval of such
operations by GL Noble Denton.
2.1.2 The guidelines and calculation methods set out in this document represent the views of GL Noble
Denton and are considered sound and in accordance with offshore industry practice. Operators should
also consider national and local regulations, which may be more stringent.
2.1.3 Due to the wide range of loadout and loadin methods, this document cannot cover all aspects of every
loadout or loadin scheme. Alternative proposals and methods will be considered on their own merits,
and can be approved if they are shown to be in accordance with safe practice.
2.1.4 This document applies particularly to skidded and trailer transported floating loadouts, in tidal waters.
The varying requirements for grounded loadouts, or loadouts accomplished by lifting are also included.
Reference to a 'barge' includes a 'ship' or a 'vessel' as applicable.
2.1.5 For lifted loadouts, the factors to be applied to rigging arrangements, lift points and structure may be
derived from the latest revision of GL Noble Denton document 0027/ND - Guidelines for Marine Lifting
Operations [Ref. 1]. It should be noted that Ref. [1], although aimed primarily at offshore lifting
operations, also includes methods and factors for lifts by floating cranes inshore, and for loadouts by
shore-mounted cranes.
2.1.6 These guidelines are intended to lead to an approval by GL Noble Denton. Such approval does not
imply that approval by designers, regulatory bodies and/or any other party would be given.
2.2 REVISIONS
2.2.1 Revision 2 dated 1 April 2002 superseded and replaced the previous Revision 1 dated 7 July 1993.
Changes introduced in Revision 2 included:
The inclusion of a Definitions Section
Expansion of the Section on Limitation of Approval
The introduction of the concept of classes of loadout, depending primarily on the tidal conditions
Reference to the Draft ISO Standard on Weight Control
Relaxation of under-keel clearance requirements.
Expansion of the Section on Moorings
Relationship of pumping requirements to the loadout class
Relationship of propulsion, braking and pull-back system requirements to the loadout class
Limited allowance of friction for temporary seafastenings
Reformatting and Section renumbering as necessary.
2.2.4 This Revision 5 supersedes and replaces Revision 4. Significant changes (indicated by a line in the
right hand margin) include:
Text in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 amended
Definitions (Barge, Insurance Warranty, IACS, Loadout, NDT, Survey, Surveyor, Vessel,
Weather Restricted Operation, and Weather Un-restricted Operations) in Section 3 revised.
Text in Section 4.2.2 revised to state loadout.
Link beam adequacy in Section 4.4.3.included.
Skidway tolerances included in Section 6.1.5.
1% load cell accuracy deleted from Section 6.2.5.
Class reinstatement added in Section 8.1.4 and Section 17.7 included.
Grounding pad area and depth added to Section 11.1. 5
Text added to Section 13.2.2 for stability of 3-point support.
Text in Section 14.3 and Table 14-1 for Class 2 skidded loadout pull-back and braking,
requirements changed from “Required” to “Recommended”. Slope changed to gradient.
Weight and CoG tolerances included in Section 16.7.
Requirements for weight reports and weighing enhanced in Section A.1.2.
Link beam construction reports added in Section A.2.8.
Reference to IACS for rigging added in Section A.8.4 and Section A.9.4.
2.3 DOWNLOADS
2.3.1 All GL Noble Denton Guidelines can be downloaded from www.gl-nobledenton.com.
3 DEFINITIONS
3.1 Referenced definitions are underlined.
4.4.5 Unless specifically included, a Certificate of Approval for loadout does not include any moorings of the
barge or vessel following completion of loadout or loadin. If approval of moorings is required, other
than for the loadout or loadin operation itself, then specific approval should be requested.
4.4.6 Any alterations to the surveyed items or agreed procedures after issue of the Certificate of Approval
may render the Certificate invalid unless the changes are approved by GL Noble Denton in writing.
5 CLASSES OF LOADOUT
The loadout operation will be classed according to the tidal conditions. Requirements for design,
reserves and redundancy of mechanical systems will vary according to the class of loadout.
Table 5-1 Loadout classes
1 The tidal range is such that regardless of the pumping capacity provided, it is not
possible to maintain the barge level with the quay throughout the full tidal cycle, and the
loadout must be completed within a defined tidal window, generally on a rising tide.
2 The tidal range is such that whilst significant pumping capacity is required, it is possible
to maintain the barge level with the quay during the full spring tidal cycle, and for at
least 24 hours thereafter.
3 Tidal range is negligible or zero, and there are no tidal constraints on loadout. Pumping
is required only to compensate for weight changes as the loadout proceeds.
4 Grounded loadout, with tidal range requiring pumping to maintain ground reaction
and/or barge loading within acceptable limits.
6 STRUCTURE TO BE LOADED
6.1 DESIGN
6.1.1 The item to be loaded, hereafter called the 'structure', shall be designed taking into account static and
dynamic loads, support conditions, environmental loads and loads due to misalignment of the barge
and shore skidways or uneven ballasting.
6.1.2 For skidded loadouts, analyses which account for the structure and skidway should be presented
which consider the elasticity, alignment and as-built dimensions of the shore and barge skidways for
each stage of loadout. In the absence of detailed information, a 75/25 percent distribution of load
across either diagonal may be considered as appropriate.
6.1.3 For trailer or SPMT loadouts, the reactions imposed by the trailer configuration shall be considered.
6.1.4 For lifted loadouts, the structure, including the padeyes, shall be analysed for the loads and reactions
imposed during the lift, as set out in Ref. [1].
6.1.5 The structure and supports shall be demonstrated as being capable of withstanding the subsidence of 5
any single support with respect to the others by at least 25mm.
6.1.6 Consideration shall also be given to lifting off construction supports or onto seafastening supports
where these operations form an integral part of the loadout operation.
6.1.7 The structural strength of high quality structural steelwork with full material certification and NDT
certificates showing appropriate levels of inspection shall be assessed using the methodology of a
recognised and applicable offshore design code including the associated load and resistance factors
for LRFD codes or safety factors for ASD/WSD codes. Traditionally AISC has also been considered a
reference code - see the Note in Section 6.1.9 below regarding its applicability.
6.1.8 Except as allowed by Section 17.4, all load cases shall be treated as a normal serviceability limit state
(SLS) / Normal operating case.
6.1.9 The infrequent load cases covered by Section 17.4 may be treated as an ultimate limit state (ULS) /
Survival storm case. This does not apply to:
Steelwork subject to deterioration and/or limited initial NDT unless the condition of the entire
loadpath has been verified, for example the underdeck members of a barge or ship.
Steelwork subject to NDT prior to elapse of the recommended cooling and waiting time as
defined by the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) and NDT procedures. In cases where
this cannot be avoided by means of a suitable WPS, it may be necessary to impose a reduction
on the design/permissible seastate.
Steelwork supporting sacrificial bumpers and guides.
Spreader bars, lift points and primary steelwork of lifted items.
Structures during a load-out.
Note:
If the AISC 13th Edition is used, the allowables shall be compared against member stresses
determined using a load factor on both dead and live loads of no less than:
WSD option LRFD Option
SLS: 1.0 1.60
ULS: 0.75 1.20
8 BARGE
8.1 CLASS
8.1.1 The barge shall be classed by a recognised IACS Member. Alternatively, structural drawings and
results of structural analyses shall be supplied to GL Noble Denton for review. Additional surveys may
be required by GL Noble Denton.
8.1.2 The loads induced during loadout, including longitudinal bending, loads on internal structure and local
loads, shall be checked to be within the approved design capabilities.
8.1.3 Mooring attachments and all attachments for jacking or winching shall be demonstrated to be adequate
for the loads anticipated during or after loadout. See also Section 10.
8.1.4 Some loadout operations may temporarily invalidate the class or loadline certificate, and it will be
necessary for any items temporarily removed for loadout be reinstated after loadout. This may apply if,
for instance, holes have been cut in the deck for ballasting, if towing connections have been removed 5
or, in some instances, after grounding on a pad. In such cases the vessel must be brought back into
class prior to sailaway.
8.2 STABILITY
8.2.1 Barge stability shall be shown to be adequate throughout the loadout operation. Particular attention
should be paid to:
A loadout onto a barge with a small metacentric height, where an offset centre of gravity may
induce a heel or trim as the structure transfer is completed – i.e. when any transverse moment
ceases to be restrained by the shore skidways or trailers.
A loadout where there is a significant friction force between the barge and the quay wall,
contributed to by the reaction from the pull on system and the moorings. The friction may cause
“hang-up” by resisting the heel or trim, until the pull-on reaction is released, or the friction force
is overcome, whereupon a sudden change of heel or trim may result. (See also Section 14.5).
Cases where a change of wind velocity may cause a significant change of heel or trim during
the operation.
8.2.2 After the structure is fully on the barge, then stability should comply with the requirements of Ref. [3]
and those of the flag state.
10 MOORINGS
10.1 A loadout may normally be considered a weather restricted operation. Limiting weather conditions for
the loadout operation shall be defined, taking into account:
the forecast reliability for the area
the duration of the operation including a suitable contingency period
the exposure of the site
the time required for any operations before or after the loadout operation including barge
movements and moorings, ballasting, system testing, final positioning and initial seafastening
currents during and following the operation, including blockage effects if applicable
the wind area of the cargo and the barge/vessel.
10.2 For weather restricted operations, the maximum forecast operational criteria should be lower than the
design criteria. As a guideline, a ratio of 0.8 for wind and 0.75 for wave height may be used to derive
the operational criteria from the design criteria.
10.3 Moorings for the loadout operation shall be designed for the limiting weather as defined in Sections
10.1 and 10.2 above.
10.4 Wires, shackles, mooring furniture including bollards, chocks, cleats, clench plates, winch to deck
anchoring arrangements and other steel components shall be designed to the certified safe working
load where applicable, or to give a factor of safety of not less than 3.0 on the breaking load for
moorings that do not consider a single mooring line failure scenario, and 2.2 where a single line
mooring failure is considered. Where a safe working load cannot be determined (e.g. for bollards,
chocks etc), then its adequacy shall be documented by calculations to either WSD of LRFD design
principles based on the maximum expected loads.
10.5 Synthetic lines are generally not preferred for loadouts, being too elastic. If used, the factor of safety
on breaking should be not less than 5.0 for moorings that do not consider a single mooring line failure
scenario, and 4.5 where a single line mooring failure is considered. New ropes should be pre-
stretched.
10.6 Mooring winches should be adequately designed, with structural capacity not less than that required by
Section 10.4. If the mooring load is to be held on the winch brake, then the brake capacity, with the
outer wrap on the drum, should exceed the mooring design load times by a minimum factor of 1.3.
Where winches are used, tension monitoring devices/meters shall be used.
10.7 In cases where existing yard loadout mooring equipment is being used, wires and winches may
sometimes be offered which have a breaking load greater than the barge equipment to which they are
connected. Great care is needed in such situations, and the wire loadings should be controlled and
monitored.
10.8 Mooring prior to and after loadout shall normally be considered an unrestricted operation. If approval
is required for such moorings, they shall normally be designed to the 10 year return period storm for
the area and season.
10.9 Safety factors in Sections 10.4 and 10.5 may be reduced on a case by case basis on the submission of
risk mitigation measures, provision of standby tugs, restricted operations or rigorous mooring design
calculations.
11 GROUNDED LOADOUTS
11.1 The plan area of the grounding pad with respect to the barge keel shall be of sufficient extent to ensure
stability of the edges of the grounding pad. Geotechnical site investigation data shall be submitted
together with geotechnical calculations demonstrating the capacity of the grounding pad. 5
11.2 A survey of levels over an area including the grounding pad shall be submitted, showing suitable
support conditions for the barge.
11.3 A bar sweep or side-scan survey, supported by divers’ inspection if appropriate, shall be made just
before positioning the barge, to ensure that no debris exists which could damage the barge bottom
plating.
11.4 If even support over the barge bottom plating cannot be achieved, then calculations shall be submitted
showing that no overstress will occur.
11.5 The barge shall be ballasted to provide sufficient ground reaction to withstand the 10 year return period
storm loadings, in both pre and post-loadout conditions, at mean high water spring tide and 10 year
storm surge condition.
11.6 The barge should be positioned and ballasted onto the pad several tides before the loadout operation,
to allow for consolidation and settlement. Barge levels should be monitored during this time.
11.7 Final skidway levels shall be compatible with assumptions used for structural analysis as in Sections
6.1.1 and 6.1.2.
11.8 The ballast shall be adjusted during loadout, if required, to avoid barge settlement or overstress.
11.9 A plan shall be prepared for the initial seafastening and float-off operation following completion of
loadout.
11.10 Even when the barge is on the grounding pad, mooring lines between the barge and quayside shall be
maintained.
11.11 Between loadout and sailaway, the barge keel shall be inspected, either by diver survey or internal
tank inspection, in order to maintain the barge in class. Class surveyor attendance will be required.
11.12 The grounding pad elevation shall be defined based on the actual depth of the barge and not the
moulded barge depth.
A 150%
1
B 150%
(Tidal window)
C 120%
2 A 150%
A 100%
3
B No requirements
(Little tide)
C 75%
A 120%
4
B 120%
(Grounded + pumping)
C 100%
12.2 Pump capacity shall be based on the published pump performance curves, taking account of the
maximum head for the operation, and pipeline losses.
12.3 If the barge pumping system is used as part of the main or back-up pump capacity, then a barge
engineer familiar with the system shall be in attendance throughout the operation. The loadout
communication system should include the pumproom.
12.4 All pumps and systems shall be tested and shown to be operational within 24 hours of the start of
loadout. At the discretion of the GL Noble Denton surveyor, a verification of pump capacity may be
required.
12.5 Pumps which require to be reversed in order to be considered as part of the back-up capacity shall be
capable of such reversal within 10 minutes, and adequate resources shall be available to perform this
operation.
12.6 Pumps which require to be moved around the barge in order to be considered as part of the back-up
capacity, shall be easily transportable, and may only be so considered if free access is provided at all
stages of loadout between the stations at which they may be required. Adequate resources shall be
available to perform this operation.
12.7 Ballast and barge levels shall be monitored during loadout, and shown to be within the limits of
movements of any link beams and the structural limitations of the barge and structure.
12.8 Where a barge, vessel or ship has a compressed air ballast/de-ballast system the time lag needed to
pressurise or de-pressurise a tank should be taken into account, as should any limitations on
differential pressure across a bulkhead.
12.9 The following table gives an example for a Class 2 Loadout that assumes that the worst single system
failure reduces the pumping capacity to 80% of the full capacity (with any consistent units).
13.4 SKIDSHOES
13.4.1 As appropriate, the requirements for trailers and SPMTs shall also apply to hydraulically operated
skidshoes. The stability of hydraulic skidshoes transverse to their line of action shall be demonstrated
to be adequate. Attention should be paid to the effects listed in Section 13.2.2.
14.7 Propulsion system design shall be in accordance with the following table:
Note: Where “recommended” is stated, and it is not planned to provide that requirement, a risk 5
assessment shall be carried out, and the risks shown to be acceptable to the approving office.
“Recommended” shall be taken to read “required” if a foreseeable failure could extend the
operation outside the planned window.
14.8 The coefficients of friction used for design of propulsion systems shall not be less than the “maximum”
values shown in the following table, unless justification can be provided for a lower value. The “typical”
values shown are for information only, and should be justified if used.
Static Moving
Level surfaces
Typical Maximum Typical Maximum
Sliding
Rolling
14.9 The nominal computed load on winching systems shall not exceed the certified safe working load
(SWL), after taking into account the requirements of Sections 14.7 and 14.8 and after allowance for
splices, bending, sheave losses, wear and corrosion. If no certified SWL is available, the nominal
computed load shall not exceed one third of the breaking load of any part of the system.
14.10 The winching system should normally be capable of moving the structure from fully on the shore to
fully on the barge without re-rigging. If re-rigging cannot be avoided, then this should be included in
the operational procedures, and adequate resources should be available.
14.11 For skidded loadouts the structure may be moved closer to the quay edge prior to the commencement
of loadout.
15 LIFTED LOADOUTS
15.1 Where the structure is lifted onto the barge by shore-based or floating crane, the requirements of Ref
[1] shall apply, as appropriate.
15.2 Loads imposed by shore-based mobile cranes on the quay shall be shown to be within allowable
values, either by calculation or historical data.
15.3 Floating cranes shall be moored as required by Section 10. Thruster assistance may be used if
available to augment the mooring arrangement following successful DP tests carried out immediately
prior to loadout.
15.4 Where the offshore lifting padeyes are used for loadout, then a programme for inspection of the lift
points after loadout shall be presented. As a minimum, inspection of the padeyes and their connection
into the structure shall be carried out by a qualified NDT inspector in accordance with the original
fabrication drawings. Access for this (including the possible de-rigging of the lift point) shall be
provided as required. At the discretion of the attending surveyor, additional NDT inspections may be
required.
15.5 If the offshore lift rigging is used for loadout then the rigging shall be inspected by a competent person
prior to departure of the structure.
16 TRANSVERSE LOADOUTS
16.1 Loadouts where the Structure is moved transversely onto the barge require special consideration and
care, for various, but not limited to, the following reasons:
In nearly all cases the ballast plan must take account of additional parameters. Structure
weight transfer, transverse heel, longitudinal trim and tidal level must all be considered.
Friction between the side of the barge and the quay may be more critical than for an end-on
loadout, as there may be a smaller righting moment available in heel than in trim to overcome
this force. Snagging or hang-up can lead to the ballast operator getting out of synchronisation
with the structure travel. Release of the snagging load has led to instability and failures.
Stability may be more critical than for an end-on loadout and changes of heel may be
significant. The moment to change the barge heel 1 degree should be computed and
understood for all stages of loadout.
16.2 A risk assessment should be made of the effects of potential errors in ballasting, and of friction
between the barge and the quay.
16.3 Calculations should be carried out for the full range of probable GM values, module weight and centre
of gravity predicted during loadout.
16.4 Ideally, discrete ballast programmes should be prepared for tidal level, weight on barge, trim and heel
corrections.
16.5 Where a winch or strand jack system is used to pull the structure onto the barge, the effects of the
pulling force on the friction on the fenders should be considered.
16.6 For sliding surfaces between the barge and the quay, particular attention should be paid to lubrication
and use of low friction or rolling fenders.
16.7 Ballasting calculations for transverse loadouts shall be based on the weighed weight and CoG and 5
include load combinations addressing weight and CoG contingencies.
18 TUGS
18.1 Approved tugs shall be available or in attendance as required, for barge movements, removal of the
barge from the loadout berth in the event of deteriorating weather, or tug back-up to the moorings.
18.2 Towing operations following loadout should generally be in accordance with GL Noble Denton
document 0030/ND - Guidelines for Marine Transportations Ref. [3].
18.3 If tugs are used as part of the loadout, inspections shall be carried out as part of the approval, i.e. for
communications and adequacy. Tug inspections shall be carried out at least 12 hours prior to the start
of operations.
REFERENCES
[1] GL Noble Denton Report No. 0027/ND – Guidelines for Marine Lifting Operations.
[2] ISO International Standard ISO 19901-5 – Petroleum and natural gas industries – specific requirements for
offshore structures – Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction.
[3] GL Noble Denton Report No. 0030/ND – Guidelines for Marine Transportations.
A.1 STRUCTURE
A.1.1 Structural analysis report, including:
Structural drawings including any additional loadout steelwork
Description of analyses programs used
Structural model
Description of support conditions
Loadcases including derivation of weights and contingencies
Unity checks greater than 0.8
Justification of over-stressed members
Detailed checks on structure support points, padeyes, winch connection points
Proposals for reinforcements if required.
A.1.2 Weight report for structure (including results of weighing operation and load cell calibration
certificates). 5
A.2 SITE
A.2.1 Site plan, showing loadout quay, position of structure, route to quay edge if applicable, position of all
mooring bollards and winches and any reinforced areas with allowable bearing capacities.
A.2.2 Section through quay wall.
A.2.3 Drawing showing heights above datum of quay approaches, structure support points, barge,
linkbeams, pad (if applicable) and water levels. The differential between civil and bathymetric datums
shall be clearly shown.
A.2.4 Statement of maximum allowable loadings on quay, quay approaches, wall, grounding pads and
foundations.
A.2.5 Specification and capacity of all mooring bollards and other attachment points proposed.
A.2.6 Bathymetric survey report of area adjacent to the quay and passage to deep water, related to same
datum as item A.2.3.
A.2.7 Bathymetric survey of pad, for grounded loadouts, related to the same datum as item A.2.3.
A.2.8 Structural drawings of skidways and link beams, with statement of structural capacity, construction
(material and NDT reports) and supporting calculations. 5
A.2.9 Method of fendering between barge and quay, showing any sliding or rolling surfaces and their
lubrication.
A.3 BARGE
A.3.1 General arrangement and compartmentation drawings.
A.3.2 Hydrostatic tables and tank tables.
A.3.3 Details of class.
A.3.4 Static stability at all stages of loadout.
A.3.5 Allowable deck loadings and skidway loadings if applicable.
A.4 TRAILERS
A.4.1 Trailer specification and configuration.
A.4.2 Details of any additional supporting steelwork, including linkspan bridges and attachments.
A.4.3 Allowable and actual axle loadings.
A.4.4 Allowable and actual spine bending moments and shear forces.
A.4.5 Schematic of hydraulic interconnections.
A.4.6 Statement of hydraulic stability of trailer or SPMT system, with supporting calculations.
A.4.7 For SPMTs, details of propulsion axles and justification of propulsion capacity.
A.4.8 Specifications of tractors if used.
A.5 PUMPS
A.5.1 Specification and layout of all pumps, including back-up pumps.
A.5.2 Pipe schematic, and details of manifolds and valves where applicable.
A.5.3 Pump performance curves.
A.9 MOORINGS
A.9.1 Limiting design and operational weather conditions for loadout.
A.9.2 Mooring arrangements for loadout operation and post-loadout condition.
A.9.3 Mooring design calculations showing environmental loads, line tensions and attachment point loads for
limiting weather condition for loadout, and for post-loadout moorings if applicable.
A.9.4 Specification and certificates of all wires, ropes, shackles, fittings and chains. This certificate shall be
issued or endorsed by a body approved by an IACS member or other recognised certification body 5
accepted by GL Noble Denton.
A.9.5 Specification for winches, details and design of winch foundation/securing arrangements.
A.9.6 Details of fendering including lubrication arrangements as appropriate.
A.10 TUGS
A.10.1 Details of any supporting tugs including bollard pull and towing equipment.
A.11 MANAGEMENT
A.11.1 Organogram showing management structure and responsibilities.
A.11.2 Location of key personnel.
A.11.3 Details of manning levels, showing adequate coverage for all operations and emergency procedures.
A.11.4 Times of shift changes, if applicable.
A.11.5 Weather forecast arrangements.
A.11.6 Communications.
A.11.7 Adequate lighting for all critical areas.
A.11.8 Operation bar-chart showing time and duration of all critical activities including:
Mobilisation of equipment
Testing of pumps and winches
Testing of pull-on and pull-back systems
Barge movements
Initial ballasting
Structure movements
Loadout operation
Trailer removal
Seafastening
Re-mooring
Decision points.
A.11.9 Methods of monitoring barge level and trim, and ballast quantities, including consideration of hang-up
between barge and quay.
A.11.10 If a computerised ballast control system is to be used, a description of the system, with back-up
arrangements, should be supplied.
A.11.11 Time and place for progress and decision meetings.
A.11.12 Safety procedures.
A.11.13 HAZOPs, HAZIDs and Risk Assessments,
A.12 CONTINGENCIES
A.12.1 Contingency plans shall be presented for all eventualities, including as appropriate:
Pump failure
Mains power supply failure
Jack-winch failure
Trailer/skidshoe power pack failure
Trailer/skidshoe hydraulics failure
Trailer tyre failure
Tractor failure
Failure of any computerised control or monitoring system
Mooring system failure
Structural failure
Deteriorating weather.