RFP Vol VII - Project Summary Bankot

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
MUMBAI
(Government of Maharashtra Undertaking)
Request for Proposal
For
Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Kolmandla, District

Raigad to Veshvi on Revas Reddi Coastal Highway (SH (Special) No. 5) in
Ratnagiri District on EPC Mode in state of Maharashtra
Volume-VII
Project Summary
MARCH - 2024
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.
Opp. Bandra Reclamation Bus Depot, Near Lilavati Hospital, KC Marg, Bandra (West),
Mumbai – 400050
Volume-
Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Kolmandla,
VII
District Raigad to Veshvi on Revas Reddi Coastal Highway (SH (Special)
Project
No. 5) in Ratnagiri District on EPC Mode in state of Maharashtra
Summary
GLOSSARY OF ITEMS
2A Two Axle
3A Three Axle
AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
AD Animal Drawn Vehicles
ADB Asian Development Bank
ADT Average Daily Traffic
AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
AIV Aggregate Impact Value
ATMS Advance Traffic Management System
BIS Bureau of Indian Standards
BOQ Bill of Quantity
BOT Build Operate & Transfer
BPO Business Process Outsourcing
BS Bureau of Standards
CBD Commercial Business District
CBR California Bearing Ratio
CBSE Central Board of Secondary Education
CC Cement Concrete
CCTV Closed Circuit Television
CD Cross Drainage
CDP City Development Plan
Ch. Chainage
CISCE Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations
CRRI Central Road Research Institute
CRZ Coastal Regulation Zone
CW Carriageway
CWC Central Water Commission
DGPS Digital Global Positioning System
DPR Detailed Project Report
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EPC Engineering Procurement & Construction
ETS Electronic Total Station
FIDIC Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils
Fig Figure
FOB Foot Over Bridge
FR Feasibility Report
FSR Feasibility Study Report
GAD General Arrangement Drawing
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GOI Government of India
GoM Government of Maharashtra
GPS Global Positioning System
GR Government Resolution
i M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
GST Goods and Service Tax

GVW Gross Vehicle Weight
Ha Hectare
HCM Heavy Construction Machinery
HDPE High Density Polyethylene
HFL High Flood Level
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection
HQ Head Office
HT Line High Tension Line
HTL High Tide Level
HVM Heavy Vehicular Machines
IR Inception Report
IRC Indian Road Congress
IRC-SP Indian Road Congress - Special Publication
IS Indian Standards
ISO International Organization for Standardization
ITI Industrial Training Institute
JNPT Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust
JSW Jindal Steel Works
Km Kilometre
LA Land Acquisition
LCV Light Commercial Vehicles
LHS Left Hand Side
LMV Light Motor Vehicle
LOA Letter of Acceptance
LOS Level of Service
LT Line Low Tension Line
LTL Low Tide Level
LWL Low Water Level
MAV Multi Axle Trucks
MIDC Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation
MJB Major Bridge
MMR Mumbai Metropolitan Region
MMRDA Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
MNB Minor Bridge
MOEF Ministry of Environment and Forests
MoR Ministry of Railways
MoRT&H Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
MoT Ministry of Transport
MSEB Maharashtra State Electricity Board
MSECPL Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd
MSRDC Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation.
MSRTC Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation.
MTHL Mumbai Trans Harbour Line
NGO Non-Government Organisation
NH National Highway
NHAI National Highway Authority of India
NHDP National Highway Development Project
ii M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
NIOS National Institute of Open Schooling

NMV Non-Motorized Vehicles
NP Non-Pressure
NPV Net Present Value
NSDP Net State Domestic Product
OD Origin Destination
OFC Optical Fibre Cables
PAF Project Affected Families
PAP Project Affected People
PCI Per Capita Income
PCU Passenger Car Unit
PHF Peak Hour Factor
PHT Peak Hour Traffic
PIA Project Influence Area
POT Point on Tangent
PP Pre-Primary
PPP Public Private Partnership
PQC Pavement Quality Concrete
PTFE Poly tetra fluro ethylene
PUP Pedestrian Under Pass
PWD Public Works Department
QAP Quality Assurance Plan
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
RAR Rehabilitation and Resettlement
RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete
RCF Rashtriya Chemical Fertilizers
RE Reinforced Earth
RF Rise Fall
RHS Right Hand Side
ROB Road Over Bridge
RoW Right of Way
RUB Road under Bridge
SCF Seasonal Correction Factor
SCLR Santacruz Chembur Link Road
SEZ Special Economic Zone
SH State Highway
SIA Social Impact Assessment
SLR Superintendent Land Records
SMV Slow Moving Vehicles
SOR Specification of References
SOR Schedule of Rates
SP Superintendent of Police
SPT Standard Penetration Test
SSR State Schedule Rate
SUG Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
TBM Temporary Bench Marks
TL Team Leader
TMC Turning Moment Count
iii M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune
Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
TOR Terms of References

TWOT Tractor without Trailer
TWT Tractor with Trailer
UCR Uncoursed Rubble
URP Utility Relocation Plan
USD U.S. Doller
VDF Vehicular Damage Factor
VOC Vehicle Operating Cost
VOP Vehicular Over Pass
VUP Vehicular Under Pass
iv M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
CONTENTS
CHAPTER-00 ....................................................................................................................... 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
0.1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................... 1
0.2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
0.3 NEED OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................... 2
0.4 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 3
0.4.1 PROPOSED ALIGNMENT ............................................................................... 3
0.4.2 GOVERNMENT APPROVAL ........................................................................... 3
0.5 OBJECTIVES OF THE SERVICES ............................................................................ 5
0.6 SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................................................................................. 5
0.7 CONSTRUCTION PACKAGES .................................................................................. 6
0.8 SALIENT FEATURES OF PROJECT ......................................................................... 1
0.9 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 2
0.10 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 3
0.11 LIST OF VILLAGES.................................................................................................... 3
0.12 DESIGN STANDARDS ADOPTED............................................................................. 4
0.13 RIGHT OF WAY ROW (ROW) ................................................................................... 4
0.14 ABUTTING LAND USE PATTERN ............................................................................. 4
0.15 TERRAIN ................................................................................................................... 4
0.16 FOREST..................................................................................................................... 4
0.17 TRAFFIC SURVEYS, ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 5
0.18 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS .......................................................................................... 6
0.19 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 9
0.20 DESIGN PROPOSALS............................................................................................... 9
0.20.1 DESIGN SPEED .............................................................................................. 9
0.20.2 DESIGN CROSS SECTION............................................................................. 9
0.21 ALIGNMENT DESIGN ................................................................................................ 9
0.21.1 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ............................................................................ 9
0.21.2 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT ............................................................................... 10
0.22 ROAD JUNCTIONS.................................................................................................. 10
0.23 PAVEMENT COMPOSITION ................................................................................... 11
0.24 PROPOSALS FOR STRUCTURES .......................................................................... 15
0.25 DETAILS OF RETAINING WALL.............................................................................. 15
0.4.1 Reference Documents .......................................................................................... 16
v M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.4.2 The Salient features of Bridge and Approaches .................................................... 16
0.4.3 The summary of Design Material .......................................................................... 17
0.4.4 Description of the Bridge ....................................................................................... 18
0.4.5 Span Arrangement ................................................................................................ 19
0.4.6 Structure at Deck .................................................................................................. 22
0.5 RE WALL ................................................................................................................. 22
0.26 R AND R APPROACH.............................................................................................. 23
0.27 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ................................................................................. 24
0.28 UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN .................................................................................. 25
0.29 LEAD CHART........................................................................................................... 25
0.30 RATE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 26
0.31 COST ESTIMATE .................................................................................................... 26
0.32 ECONOMIC EVALUATION ...................................................................................... 27
0.33 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS .............................................................. 27
0.34 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION .............................................................. 27
0.34.1 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................... 27
0.34.2 RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................... 28
vi M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 0. 1 Key Map .............................................................................................................. 3

Figure 0. 2 Key Map of Bankot creek Bridge ......................................................................... 7
Figure 0. 3 Graphical representation of abutting land use pattern in CP-07........................... 4
Figure 0. 4 Earthquake Zone of India .................................................................................. 19
Figure 0. 5 Span Arrangement of Bridge (Sectional Elevation for Navigational Span) ......... 21
Figure 0. 6 Deck Structure .................................................................................................. 22
LIST OF TABLES
Table 0. 1 Salient Features of Project ................................................................................... 1

Table 0. 2 Alignment Description........................................................................................... 3
Table 0. 3 List of Villages passing through Project Corridor .................................................. 4
Table 0. 4 Traffic Survey Location and Schedule .................................................................. 5
Table 0. 5 Annual Average Daily Traffic Summary at various locations (In PCUs) ................ 5
Table 0. 6 Adopted Traffic growth rates ................................................................................ 6
Table 0. 7 Combined Traffic Forecast ................................................................................... 7
Table 0. 8 Estimated traffic for two lane stretch of Project ..................................................... 9
Table 0. 9 Typical Cross Section Schedule ........................................................................... 9
Table 0. 10 Details of at Grade Major Intersection .............................................................. 10
Table 0. 11 Details of at Grade Secondary Junctions .......................................................... 11
Table 0. 12 Design Traffic ................................................................................................... 11
Table 0. 13 Pavement Structural Details ............................................................................. 12
Table 0. 14 Summary of Recommended Pavement Crust Summary................................... 13
Table 0. 15 Design parameters for Dowel bars and Tie Bars .............................................. 13
Table 0. 16 Summary of Reinforcement System ................................................................. 14
Table 0. 17 Proposals for Structures ................................................................................... 15
Table 0. 18 Details of Retaining wall ................................................................................... 15
Table 0. 19 Details of RE wall ............................................................................................. 22
Table 0. 20 List of affected structures ................................................................................. 24
Table 0. 21 Lead Chart ....................................................................................................... 26
vii M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune
Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
CHAPTER-00
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.1 BACKGROUND
This Coastal Highway is traversing through various towns like Alibag, Chaul,
Revdanda, Nandgaon, Murud, Shrivardhan, Mandangad, Dapoli, Harihareshwar,
Guhaghar, Jaigad, Ganpatipule of Raigad & Ratnagiri district and further passes
through Devgad, Malvan, Vengurla, Kudal and Sawantwadi talukas of Sindhudurg
district. This portion of the project road is yet to be declared as NH necessary
proposal is submitted to MoRT&H by State Govt. and as per Road Development Plan
1981-2001 Talasri to Patradevi is coastal highway MSH-4. Deputy Chief Minister and
Finance Minister of the State has announced to develop this coastal Highway with
world class facilities in line with California Coastal Highway in budget session of 2020
on 8th March 2020 in the Assembly to boost the economy of the Konkan region and
work is entrusted to MSRDC as deposit contribution work. As per directives of Govt.
vide letter dated 30.06.2020, project is handed over to MSRDC by the CE (NH) PWD
Konkan Bhavan Mumbai. MSRDC has given presentation to Hon‟ble Chief Minister,
GoM on 16.06.2021 on concept of development of coastal Highway in line with
California coastal highway along coast line by constructing missing creek bridges on
priority.
0.2 INTRODUCTION
Recently, MSRDC has been assigned for development of Coastal highway link from
JNPT-Revas bundar-Alibag-Murud-Shrivardhan to Bagmandla (Bankot) in Raigad
District. This report is submitted in accordance with the Terms of Reference and
Inception report and QAP plan approved by MSRDC. Final Feasibility Report has
been prepared and submitted after Preliminary survey of subjected road project by
keeping in view the observations/ comments from client. Widening proposal is of
construction of two lanes with paved shoulders along road stretch and balances both
side highway and Sagarmala links by up gradation with existing highway. With the
disposition of these both sides of existing highways and upcoming Sagarmala links,
one can note this alignment runs more or less concurrent along the Sea Face, serve
as single feeder link to major beaches along the road side. MSRDC has
commissioned services to M/s. Monarch for preparation of said DPR. As per
requirement of task M/s. Monarch carried out all feasibility surveys, investigations &
1 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
studies. This Final Feasibility Report has been submitted in response to the Terms of
Reference clause 10.3, stage 2. On other hand, Final Detailed Project Report is
being submitted in response to the Terms of Reference clause 10.7, stage 3.
Modifications and up gradations were incorporated in this DPR which has been
suggested by MSRDC and actual project requirements. As a part of the study to
establish the viability, this Project Report has been prepared after carrying out
engineering surveys and appropriate assessment of a preliminary design considering
the engineering conditions, the present traffic and its growth, the environmental
impact assessment as well as the social aspects along with cost assessment. This
report among other aspects covers the details of various structures on river, streams,
creeks, nalla, existing crossings of roads, rails, water bodies and grade separators
along the proposed Coastal way, Preparation of section 3 for ROW and allied
structures and marking of alignment on revenue maps, identification of Tourist spots,
eco-friendly structures, and water bodies etc. along and within the proposed Right of
Way inclusive of demarcation of RoW at project corridor.
0.3 NEED OF THE PROJECT
The commuters or tourists need to follow existing available highway for missing link
due to creek portion, either they prefer ferry ride or they should travel long distance
which is available towards Sahyadri hill at narrow width of water way for bridge
crossing.
Currently, there is no through road from Mumbai to Goa Border along coast line. The
existing MSH-04 coastline road is available in segmental manner due to long creeks.
Due to this discontinuity, road user or tourists have some restrictions to plan their
trips. To avoid such difficulties and to boost for tourism industry, it is necessary to
improve existing MSH-04 by constructing creek bridges along the coast line on
priority. For commuters other than tourists, the existing NH-66 and upcoming Konkan
Expressway will be available for travel with high speed.
It was also commonly observed that people from MMR region and rest of
Maharashtra, frequently visits the beaches along coastline of Maharashtra as a relief
from their daily routine stress. As there is no through coastal road option in terms of
coastal Highway is available to the tourists for enjoyable reach at everywhere along
Coastline picnic spots. There is a limitation for tourism development due lack of
through link and the time taken for journey. To encourage tourism, it strongly needs
to improve the existing MSH-04 Road to attract the tourists in numbers by connecting
all missing links with shortest distance.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Figure 0. 1 Key Map
0.4 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION
0.4.1 PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
The Start point of Coastal Highway is proposed at Dronagiri node of CIDCO via
Karanja Revas village, Raigad district and passes through Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg
district and ends at Kiranpani – Arondha Bridge on Maharashtra State Border on NH-
66.
This Coastal Highway is traversing through various towns like Alibag, Chaul,
Revdanda, Nandgaon, Murud, Shrivardhan, Mandangad, Dapoli, Harihareshwar,
Guhaghar, Jaigad, Ganpatipule of Raigad & Ratnagiri district and further passes
through Devgad, Malvan, Vengurla, Kudal and Sawantwadi talukas of Sindhudurg
district. Due to the upgradation of the highway, the journey from Dronagiri (Revas) to
Kiranpani – Arondha Bridge (Reddi) will take about 10 to 11 hours.
0.4.2 GOVERNMENT APPROVAL

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
In order to boost the tourism of the state considering tourist locations along the
coastline and establish connectivity to international tourist with Navi Mumbai Airport,
Goa Airport and Chipi airport and Domestic tourist by establishing connectivity with
other National Highway grid.
The proposal of development of coastal highway was discussed in Cabinet infra-

structure committee meeting under chairmanship of the chief Minister, GoM held on
14.01.2021 and again on 25.08.2021 and MoM was issued on 26.08.2021. Govt. has
granted permission to MSRDC to implement the up gradation of Revas to Reddi
coastal highway for four lane/two lane carriageway with paved shoulders with rigid
pavement on deposit contribution basis vide GR dated 06.09.2021. Govt. has also
accorded approval to proposed alignment and block estimate of the project and
directed to implement the project in phased manner by giving priority for construction
of missing bridges and bypasses with land acquisition required for highway.
In view of this MSRDC Ltd has submitted proposal of implementation of the project in
phased manner vide letter no. MSRDC/Revas-Reddi/Mantralya/2021 /6732 (b) dated
23.11.2021. Govt. in Public Works Department has accorded approval vide Govt.
letter no 202 khashes;0/P. K.266/Raste-8 dated 23.02.2022.
GoM has directed to take up the work in hand under following phases by completing
the work of preparation of Detailed Project Report.
PHASE-I
1) Construction of following 3 major creek bridges on proposed alignment
a) Construction of Bridge across Dharmtar creek between Revas- Karanja on

Revas-Reddi Coastal Highway
b) Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Village kolmandla

in Raigad District and Village Veshvi in Ratnagiri District on Revas Reddi
Coastal Highway MSH No.04
c) Construction of Major Bridge across Kelshi Creek on Revas- Reddi Coastal

Highway Tal. Dapoli, dist. Ratnagiri.
2) Land acquisition for Geometrical Improvement of the proposed alignment and

bypasses.
3) The work stretches between the two destinations in which no land acquisition is
required shall be taken in hand for execution.
PHASE-II

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
1) Construction of all balance missing creek bridges along the proposed coastal
highway.
2) Construction of Balance stretches of highway, bypasses and bridges
3) Govt. directed to update the progress of work for Govt. Review time to time.
MSECPL (M/s. Monarch Surveyors and Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd.) has been
entrusted the Consultancy services for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR)
for Rehabilitation and Upgrading to Single/Intermediate lanes to Two Lane with
paved shoulder/ Four lane configuration of JNPT - Revas bundar - Alibag – Murud -
Shrivardhan to Bagmandla (Bankot) in Raigad District by the ‘Maharashtra State
Road Development Corporation”.
The Consultant has studied the alignment finalized by the CE PW (NH), Mumbai and
fresh mandate given to them to consider proposed alignment as close as to coastline
in line with California coastal Highway. Consultant has submitted three alternative
alignments and recommended for preferred alignment based on evaluation matrix.
Government of Maharashtra, Public Works Department has accorded approval to the
preferred alignment vide G. R. No KHASHE-2022/P. K. 79/Raste-8 dated 16.03.2022
0.5 OBJECTIVES OF THE SERVICES
The main objective of the consultancy service is to establish the technical, economic
viability of the project and prepare detailed project reports for rehabilitation and
upgrading of the existing roads with appropriate lane configuration.
0.6 SCOPE OF SERVICES
a) The up-gradation of work to appropriate lane width shall be within the existing
right of way as far as possible avoiding land acquisition, except for locations
having inadequate width and where provisions of short realignments, alignment
corrections, and improvement of intersections are considered necessary and
practicable and cost effective.
b) The Consultant shall furnish land acquisition details as per revenue records/maps
for further processing of land acquisition. Consultant shall also submit section 3
and 15(2) draft notification under Maharashtra Highway Act 1955. For further
action MSRDC is in process of appointment of land acquisition consultant.
c) The Consultants shall prepare documents for EPC mode of contracts under DPR
assignment.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
d) Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Management Plan and
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Studies shall be carried out by the Consultant
meeting the requirements of the lending agencies like ADB/ World Bank/JICA, etc.
e) Wherever required, consultant will liaise with concerned authorities and arrange
all clarifications. Approval of all drawings including GAD and detail engineering
drawings will be got done by the consultant from the Railways. However, if
Railways require proof checking of the drawings prepared by the consultants, the
same will be got done by MSRDC and payment to the proof consultant shall be
made by MSRDC. Consultant will also obtain „NO Objection Certificate‟ from
Ministry of Environment Forest and Climatic Changes (MoEF&CC) and also
incorporate the estimates for shifting of utilities of all types of services involved
from concerned local authorities in the DPR.
f) The consultant shall prepare the bid documents including required technical
schedules as per EPC mode of contract documents. For that it is suggested that
consultant should also go through the EPC documents of ministry before bidding
the project. The Consultant shall assist the MSRDC and its Financial Consultant
and the Legal Adviser by furnishing clarifications as required for the financial
appraisal and legal scrutiny of the Project Highway and Bid Documents.
0.7 CONSTRUCTION PACKAGES
The entire Package-I lies in Raigad district which passes through 3 talukas; Alibag,
Murud & Shrivardhan. It is noted that Taluka boundaries terminates at Creek Portion
which are currently missing link. To achieve construction easiness, it is necessary to
avoid missing link. Considering size of the project 159.611 km, it is better to prepare
construction packages in phased manner on following backgrounds:
 Smaller construction packages will result in neutral & competitive bidding.
 Fast JM Process and Possession of Land due to smaller construction

packages.
 No effect on routine tourism of the individual regional territory due to division

of work by various construction packages.
 It would be possible to get administrative approval for missing creek individual

creek bridges therefore construction packages for bridge with approaches
and road work are proposed separately.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Considering above parameters, Different Construction Packages for Coastal
Highway PKG-I Revas to Bankot (159.611Km) has prepared. This Project summary
Report describes Construction of Two-Lane Bridge across Bankot Creek with
approaches Connecting Danda Tq. Shreevardhan and Bankot Tq. Ratnagiri in
Raigad & Ratnagiri District only (km 157+899 to km 159+611)
Harihareshwar
Beach
Danda
157+899
`
Proposed Bankot
Creek Bridge
Reddi Bankot
159+661
Proposed Bridge
Proposed Approaches
Figure 0. 2 Key Map of Bankot creek Bridge

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.8 SALIENT FEATURES OF PROJECT
The salient features of the Project bridge are as given below:
Table 0. 1 Salient Features of Project
Features From km 157+899 to km 159+611

Length of Bridge 1.711 km
Lane Configuration Two Lane with PS from 157+899 to km
159+610
Proposed RoW 30.00 m
Project Theme Construction of Two Lane Bridge across
Bankot Creek with Approaches connecting
Harihareshwar Tq. Shrivardhan to Bankot
Tq. Mandangad on Revas-Redi Coastal
Highway (MSH-04) in Raigad and Ratnagiri
District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC
Mode
Administrative District Raigad & Ratanagiri
Administrative Taluka Shrivardhan and Ratangiri
Villages (No) 02 (Danda, Bankot )
Utilization length of existing road. (km) At start and end Point
Length of green field alignment (km) 1.711
Horizontal geometry Overall horizontal geometry is as per NH
standard
Vertical geometry Overall vertical geometry is as per NH
standard.
Major Creek Bridges(No.) One across Bankot Creek
Length of RE Wall (m) 371 m on Both Side
Length of Retaining wall (m) Nil
Bus shelters/Bus stops (No.) Nil
At Grade Major Junctions (No.) Nil
At Grade Minor Junctions (No.) Nil
Length of Built up drain (Meter) Nil
Average travel speed kmph 40-60 in Built-up Section, 80-100 in Open
Country Section
Pavement composition PQC M40 –300 mm

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Features From km 157+899 to km 159+611

DLC – 150 mm
GSB – 250 mm
Road Furniture Provisions are made as per IRC: 67:2012.
Road Markings Provisions are made as per IRC: 35:2015.
Salient features of Bridge
1 Total Length 1.340 km

2 Width of Bridge as per IRC: SP -73 18.00 m
3 Design Speed 80 kmph
4 ROW and Carriageway As shown in TCS drawings and given in
TCS Schedule given below
5 Central Median Nil
6 Footpath 1.50m on both sides of carriageway
7 Provisions of utility Additional Load of 0.1T/m shall be
considered on each side of footpath and
necessary arrangement shall be provided
as per site requirements.
9 Decorative Bridge Lighting As per Detailed Design
10 Decorative Street Lighting As per Detailed Design
11 Navigation Span 1 nos.
12 Minimum Clear Horizontal 100.00 m
Clearance for Navigation Span
13 Minimum Clear Vertical Clearance 30.00 m
for Navigation Span
14 Type of Foundation Pile Foundation
15 Type of Sub Structure RCC Structure
16 Type of Superstructure Cable stay for Navigational span and
RCC structure for remaining length and
approaches
17 Inspection Gallery At each Pier cap with proper railing as per
GAD
18 Fender arrangement for Navigational span
19 Expansion Joint Strip Seal expansion joint
20 Type of Bearing Spherical
0.9 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
The main scope of “Rehabilitation and Up gradation of Revas-Reddi Coastal

Highway MSH-04” is based on the engineering surveys & investigations for various

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
engineering aspects that governs project costs. With this objective, the methodology
adopted for the project is based on initial studies, secondary data, traffic analysis,
topographic survey, revenue calculations and Cost Estimates. Preliminary Design
and Engineering field studies such as subsoil investigations, material investigation,
traffic surveys & forecasting works are completed for the final preferred alignment as
suggested in the Alignment Report submitted separately.
0.10 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION
The project site of “Revas-Reddi Coastal Highway MSH-04 Construction of

Agardanda Creek bridge” starts at Agardanda Near at KM 157+899 and ends Near
Bagmandla at KM 159+610. Overall length of the package is 1.711 KM. Following
table 0.3 shows the Geographic Locations Details of the alignment of the proposed
corridor.
Table 0. 2 Alignment Description
Sr. No. Component Description

1 Start Latitude/ Longitude 17º 59΄ 24.08˝ N, 73º 02΄ 24.6˝ E Near Danda
2 End Latitude/ Longitude 17º 58΄ 23.21˝ N, 73º 2΄ 13.26˝ E Near Bankot
3 Village 02 (Danda, Bankot )
3a Taluka Shrivardhan and Ratangiri
3b District Raigad, Ratnagiri
3c State Maharashtra
4 Start at Km 157+899
5 End at Km 159+610
6 Nearest Railway Station
7 Nearest Airport Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai
8 Nearest Jetty
0.11 LIST OF VILLAGES
Project alignment passes entirely through Murud & Mhasala Taluka of Raigad
District. List of villages through which project alignment is passing in Murud &
Mhasala taluka is given below:

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Table 0. 3 List of Villages passing through Project Corridor
Sr. Length
Village Name Start Chainage End Chainage
No. (km)
1 DANDA 157+899 157+165 0.734
2 BANKOT 158+872 159+610 0.738
0.12 DESIGN STANDARDS ADOPTED
The design of road geometry for the project road for Bankot Creek bridge is proposed
to be based on “The Manual of Standards & Specifications for Two laning of National
Highways through Public Private Partnership (PPP) Mode” published by Planning
commission, New Delhi, IRC: SP: 73-2018.
0.13 RIGHT OF WAY ROW (ROW)
Government of Maharashtra has directed to consider 30 m RoW for two lane paved
shoulder.
0.14 ABUTTING LAND USE PATTERN
The land use pattern on both sides of the project highway in maximum section is
agricultural, followed by barren land.
Figure 0. 3 Graphical representation of abutting land use pattern in CP-07
0.15 TERRAIN
The terrain of this stretch can be termed as plain and flat throughout.
0.16 FOREST
There is no forest anywhere along the project corridor.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.17 TRAFFIC SURVEYS, ANALYSIS
The following traffic surveys were mainly conducted to arrive at the projected traffic
on the proposed expressway:
▪ Classified Traffic Volume Count (TVC) Surveys
▪ Origin and destination (O-D) surveys
▪ Axle Load (AL) Surveys

All survey types were conducted in accordance with the guidelines specified in IRC
9-1972, IRC 102-1988, and IRC SP19-2001. The surveys were conducted at points
close to where the proposed Expressway would intersect with the National, State,
and other highways/district roads and other locations from which, traffic that may
eventually use the Coastal way either partly or entirely. The following Table presents
the location of above surveys and traffic survey schedule
Table 0. 4 Traffic Survey Location and Schedule
Sr.
Survey Description Location Start Date End Date
No.
1 2 Day Manual TVC Thal 19 Dec 2021 21 Dec 2021
2 2 Day Manual TVC Nagaon 19 Dec 2021 21 Dec 2021
3 1 Day Video TVC Vadkhal 23 Dec 2021 24 Dec 2021
4 1 Day OD Vadkhal 23 Dec 2021 24 Dec 2021
5 1 Day Axle Load Vadkhal 23 Dec 2021 24 Dec 2021
6 3 Day Video TVC Murud 19 Dec 2021 22 Dec 2021
7 2 Day Manual TVC Wadvali 26 Dec 2021 28 Dec 2021
8 1 Day OD Mhasala 27 Dec 2021 28 Dec 2021
9 1 Day Axle Load Mhasala 27 Dec 2021 28 Dec 2021
10 3 Day TMC Ghoteghar 19 Dec 2021 22 Dec 2021
11 3 Day TMC JSW 02 Jan 2022 05 Jan 2022
12 3 Day TMC Shrivardhan 23 Dec 2021 26 Dec 2021
As described above locations traffic survey activities has been conducted and after
analysing the same ADT has been prepared further correction factors are applied to
achieve AADT. Adopted Seasonal Correction Factor for survey carried out in the
month of December are.
 SCF for Petrol Vehicles: 1.1
 SCF for Diesel Vehicles: 1.2
Table 0. 5 Annual Average Daily Traffic Summary at various locations (In PCUs)

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Location Car Bus Truck Total

A1 2DAYS CVC - THAL 4868 956 1353 7178
A2 3DAYS CVC Karle 9423 1339 2366 13128
A3 3DAYS CVC Parhur 2929 354 1786 5068
A4 1Day CVC VADKHAL 9221 1409 3499 14130
A5 2DAYS CVC -NAGAON 1792 244 128 2163
A6 3DAYS CVC Korlai 2718 423 193 3334
A7 3DAYS CVC MURUD 1563 431 173 2167
A8 2DAYS CVC -WADVALI 1260 454 416 2131
A9 3DAYS CVC Galsure 1300 299 299 1898
Highest traffic is observed at Wadvali in this section.
0.18 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
The socio-economic indicators, namely, Net State Domestic Product (NSDP),

Population and Per Capita Income (PCI) for PIA have been collected from various
secondary sources for using in the estimation of traffic growth rates. Weighted Socio-
Economic Indicators have been calculated for each vehicle type using the Zone
Influence Factors observed from OD survey. These have been summarized and
Traffic Growth rates are adopted for said package is as below.
Table 0. 6 Adopted Traffic growth rates
Time 2-axle 3-axle

Cars Bus LCV MAV
Period Truck Truck
2021-2023 8.42 4.14 5.75 5.67 4.73 1.77
2023-2028 9.16 3.65 7.98 7.82 6.52 2.28
2028-2033 9.89 3.05 6.66 6.52 5.69 1.99
2033-2038 10.60 2.52 5.51 5.41 4.72 1.73
2038-2043 10.76 2.10 4.58 4.47 3.89 1.50
2043-2048 10.39 1.84 4.02 3.73 3.25 1.31
2048-2053 10.39 1.67 3.66 3.39 2.96 1.25
The traffic has been forecasted as per the projected traffic growth rates as mentioned
in the above table. Traffic forecast has been carried out for each location as per the
base traffic numbers derived from the classified volume count. Traffic is forecasted
up to 2053 as shown in tables below. Indo HCM 2017 is used for determining lane
capacity required.

Volume-VII
Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Kolmandla, District Raigad to Veshvi on Revas Reddi
Project Summary
Coastal Highway (SH (Special) No. 5) in Ratnagiri District on EPC Mode in state of Maharashtra
Table 0. 7 Combined Traffic Forecast
Bus 3-
Two Auto Car / Jeep / Mini 2-axle Total
Year LGV axle MAV Total PCUs
Wheeler Rick. Taxi Minibus Bus LGV Truck Vehicles
Truck
2022 9886 844 9221 98 216 1316 556 256 184 217 22794 23730
2023 10380 861 9998 102 225 1392 588 270 192 221 24229 25195
2024 10899 878 10913 106 233 1503 634 291 205 226 25889 27013
2025 11444 896 14359 110 323 1623 761 416 263 371 30566 33588
2026 12016 914 15674 114 334 1753 822 449 280 379 32735 36037
2027 12617 932 17109 118 346 1892 887 484 299 388 35073 38682
2028 13248 950 18676 123 359 2043 958 521 318 397 37594 41542
2029 13910 969 20523 126 370 2180 1022 555 336 405 40397 44584
2030 14606 989 22553 130 381 2325 1090 592 355 413 43433 47879
2031 15336 1009 24784 134 393 2479 1162 630 376 421 46724 51448
2032 16103 1029 27235 138 405 2645 1240 671 397 429 50292 55316
2033 16908 1049 29929 142 417 2821 1322 715 419 438 54162 59509
2034 17753 1070 33101 146 428 2976 1395 754 439 446 58509 64047
2035 18641 1092 36610 150 439 3140 1472 795 460 453 63251 68990
2036 19573 1114 40490 153 450 3313 1553 838 482 461 68427 74377
2037 20552 1136 44782 157 461 3496 1639 883 504 469 74079 80250
2038 21579 1159 49528 161 473 3689 1729 931 528 477 80255 86659
2039 22658 1182 54858 165 483 3858 1808 972 549 484 87018 93498
2040 23791 1205 60762 168 493 4035 1891 1016 570 492 94423 100977
2041 24981 1230 67301 172 503 4219 1978 1061 592 499 102536 109161
2042 26230 1254 74544 175 513 4413 2068 1109 616 507 111428 118120
2043 27541 1279 82566 179 524 4615 2163 1158 639 514 121180 127934

Volume-VII
Project Summary
Bus 3-
Two Auto Car / Jeep / Mini 2-axle Total
Year LGV axle MAV Total PCUs
Wheeler Rick. Taxi Minibus Bus LGV Truck Vehicles
Truck
2044 28918 1305 91148 182 534 4800 2250 1201 660 521 131520 138195
2045 30364 1331 100621 186 544 4993 2341 1246 682 528 142835 149416
2046 31882 1358 111078 189 554 5194 2435 1293 704 535 155221 161691
2047 33476 1385 122623 192 564 5403 2533 1341 727 542 168785 175125
2048 35150 1412 135367 196 574 5620 2634 1391 751 549 183645 189836
2049 36908 1441 149436 199 584 5826 2731 1438 773 556 199890 205817
2050 38753 1469 164967 203 594 6038 2831 1487 796 562 217700 223333
2051 40691 1499 182112 206 604 6259 2934 1537 819 569 237230 242539
2052 42725 1529 201039 209 614 6488 3041 1589 843 577 258655 263606
2053 44862 1559 221933 213 624 6725 3152 1643 868 584 282164 286723

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.19 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
After the completion of above surveys, the following outcome has been estimated for
further development proposals.
Table 0. 8 Estimated traffic for two lane stretch of Project
Year 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2053

Traffic In PCUs per Day 11252 15513 21265 29002 39412 53506 64510
LOS offered by Two lane Road LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F LOS F LOS F
From above, the said section is eligible for Two lane divided carriageway. Hence, two lanes
is proposed on the basis of HCM issued by CSIR, New Delhi.
0.20 DESIGN PROPOSALS
0.20.1 DESIGN SPEED
The project alignment is having two Lanes with Paved Shoulders Configuration. The
alignment has been designed with the design speed of 80 km/hr. for plain/rolling
terrain and 60/40 km/hr for Hilly terrain/ Busy built-up areas.
0.20.2 DESIGN CROSS SECTION
Typical Cross-Section of the project Highway are proposed on the basis Manual IRC
SP 73-2018 with some necessary modifications, these indicative cross sections for
CP-07 follow with reference to the Manual IRC SP 73-2018 without hampering its
self-explanatory status.
Table 0. 9 Typical Cross Section Schedule
Sr. Design Chainage

(M) Length
No TCS Type Remarks
(M)
. From To
1 157+899 158+211 312.00 TCS-3B Approach
2 158+211 159+551 1340.00 TCS-3A Bridge
3 159+551 159+610 59.00 TCS-3B Approach
0.21 ALIGNMENT DESIGN
0.21.1 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
Broken back and reverse curves are found in sizable number at site along existing
alignment of coastal road. Few of the existing horizontal curves, which are found
deficient in terms of radius, layouts, transition lengths, super elevation etc., are

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
refined in accordance with minimum requirement criteria specified in IRC: SP:73-
2018.
0.21.2 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT
The proposed alignment passes mainly through Plain/Ruling areas in Package 01 of

coastal road. In most of the stretches, attempts have been made to keep the gradient
below 3.5% and also avoid deep cuttings. However, at the valley and hilly areas,
steep gradients in permissible limits are proposed. The vertical profile is shown in the
plan and profile drawings of the drawing volume. The details of vertical curves for all
project corridors are worked out. The profile of the project corridors has been
finalized on the basis of the DTM data collected during the topographic survey. In
addition to the standards and guidelines as per IRC and MoRTH, a number of other
considerations have been made to finalize the vertical profile.
0.22 ROAD JUNCTIONS
Primary Intersections are most important busy intersections followed by major

roads like NH/SH etc. We have proposed junction developments in accordance with
IRC: SP: 41:1994 or grade separated facilities in accordance with IRC: 62:1976 by
VUP provision for these primary/major junctions. There are total 2 intersections noted
along the project corridor i.e. in the start and at the end of alignment. The proposal
of channelized junctions is made in accordance with IRC: SP: 41:1994.
Table 0. 10 Details of at Grade Major Intersection
Existing
Design Type of Side
Sr. Chainag Type of Cross
Chainage Junction (LHS/RHS Destination Remark
No. e Road
(Km) (Y,T,X) / Both)
(Km)
1 157+899 Y SH and NH
2 159+610 X SH
Secondary Junctions - These are less important intersections followed by minor

roads like MDR/ODR/VR/Local streets etc. These secondary junctions are proposed
for junction improvements only at grade level.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Table 0. 11 Details of at Grade Secondary Junctions
Type
Existing Design Side of
Sr. Type of Destinatio Remar
Chainag Chainag (LHS/RH Cros
No. Junction n k
e e S/ Both) s
Road
Nil
0.23 PAVEMENT COMPOSITION
Considering heavy rainfall zone of the area, a project road recommended for rigid
pavement for main Carriageway and paved shoulders. The detailed design for entire
corridor is under the head of Pavement Design chapter of main report. The entire
design has been prepared by considering safety of road users, economy of project
and environment friendly construction. The entire pavement design is based on IRC:
58:2015. The design is prepared on following input parameters
Design traffic - From Projected Traffic figures from traffic analysis and forecast are
considered for two lanes pavement design stretch is 688 CVPD for base year 2022.
Table 0. 12 Design Traffic
Description Value for Two of lane
Design Period (years) 30

Total Two-way Commercial Traffic (CVPD) in the year of
763
completion of construction
Av. Annual rate of growth of commercial traffic
0.05
(expressed as decimal)
Cumulative No of Commercial vehicles during design
18502887
period (two-way), A
Average No of axles per commercial vehicle, B 2.35
Cumulative No of Commercial Axles during design period
43481784
(two-way), C = A*B
Proportion of traffic in predominant 1
Lateral Placement factor 0.25

Factor for selection of traffic for BUC analysis (for six-
0.457
hour period during day), F
Factor for selection of traffic for TDC analysis (for six-
0.033
hour period during day), G
Design axle repetitions for BUC analysis (for 6 hour day
4967794
time traffic)
Proportion of vehicles with spacing between front and the
1.00
first rear axle less than the spacing of transverse joints,

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary

Design axle repetitions for TDC analysis (for 6-hour night
3587247
time traffic)
Proportion of Front single (steering) Axles, K1 0.443
Proportion of Rear single Axles,K2 0.429
Proportion of tandem Axles, K3 0.111
Proportion of Tridem Axles, K4 = (1-K1-K2-K3) 0.017
Effective CBR – Single value of 7% of effective CBR has been computed 90th
percentile CBR value of field tests results at site. To compute single CBR value out
of all of the test values. The homogeneous stretches in accordance with CBR range
has finalized and as per IRC guidelines from IRC-37-2012 (Annex-IV, Pg.67), 90th
percentile CBR value is determined as 7%.
Pavement structural Details – The entire pavement design is based on following

Structural parameters adopted under the guidelines of on IRC: 58:2015.
Table 0. 13 Pavement Structural Details
Modulus of subgrade reaction of subgrade, MPa/m 48
Thickness of Granular Sub base, mm 250
Thickness of Dry Lean Concrete sub base, mm 150

Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of foundation,
277
MPa/m
Unit weight of Concrete, kN/m3 24
28-day Flexural strength of cement concrete, MPa 4.5

0
Max. day-time Temperature Differential in slab, C
20.3
(for bottom-up cracking)
Night-time Temperature Differential in slab, 0C (for
15.15
top-down cracking)
Trail Slab Thickness ,mm 240
Load Transfer Efficiency Factor for TDC analysis,
0.66
Beta
Elastic Modulus of Concrete, Ec (MPa) 3000
Poisson's Ratio of Concrete, Mu 0.15
Radius of relative stiffness, m 0.59772

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Pavement Design Output – After adopting above design input parameters and
structural details, design output is as follows-
For slab thickness 240 mm = 0.240 m for CP-07
Radius of relative stiffness (l) = = 0.59772 m
Total Bottom-up Fatigue Damage =0.549

Total Top-Down Fatigue Damage =0.201
Sum of CFD for BUC +TDC =0.549+0.201 = 0.750
Design thickness is safe, as 0.750 < 1. Hence, 240 mm thickness is safe. As per
clause no.6.3.4.1 of IRC: 58:2015, the design thickness may be increased by 10 mm
to (i) to permit two retexturing and (ii) grinding to rectify faulting during the service life.
Therefore, consider slab thickness 250 mm.is recommended
Table 0. 14 Summary of Recommended Pavement Crust Summary
Rigid Pavement for Two lane stretch

Main Carriage way with tied concrete
shoulders
PQC DLC GSB Total
300 mm 150 mm 250 mm 700 mm
Reinforcement System – After obtaining 250 mm pavement thickness, Dowel bars

and tie bars are Designed on following design parameters.
Table 0. 15 Design parameters for Dowel bars and Tie Bars
Sr.
Parameter Value for Two of lane
No.
Dowel Bars
1 PQC thickness 300 mm
2 Joint width – expansion 20 mm
Joint width – contraction 5 mm
3 Modulus of sub-grade reaction “k” 48 Mpa / m
4 Radius of relative thickness (I) 616.30 mm
5 E for dowel bar 200000 MPa
6 Modulus of Dowel support 415000 MPa/m
7 Maximum single axle load 190 kN

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Sr.
Parameter Value for Two of lane
No.
8 Maximum single wheel load 190 / 2 = 95 kN
Load transfer at terminal stage to tied concrete
9 30%
shoulder
10 Wheel load for dowel bar design 70% = 95 * 0.7 = 66.5 kN
11 Load transfer through dowel bar 50% = 56 * 0.5 = 33.25 kN
Tie Bars
Slab Thickness 0.25
Lane Width ,b 3.5
Coefficient of friction, f 1.5
Density, KN/M3 24
Allowable Tensile stress for Plain Bars, Mpa 125
Allowable Tensile stress for Deformed Bars, Mpa 200
Allowable Bond stress for plain Bars, Mpa 1.75
Allowable Bond stress for deformed Bars, Mpa 2.46
Diameter of tie bar 12
Frictional force at bottom of slab, AS Plain 252
Frictional force at bottom of slab, AS Deformed 157.5
C/S of Bar 113.097
Perimeter of Tie bar 37.69
Spacing of Tie Bar ,Plain 425
Length of tie bar, L, Plain 580
Spacing of Tie Bar, Deformed 700
Length of tie bar, L, Deformed 640
Summary of Reinforcement System –

Table 0. 16 Summary of Reinforcement System
Description Two Lane Carriageway
Panel size 3.5 m x 4.5 m + tied concrete shoulders on either side
Reinforcement System Dowel bar (Plain 40 mm) spacing 250 mm and length 450 mm
Tia bar (Plain 12 mm)

Spacing 425 mm and length 580mm
Tie bar (Deformed 12 mm)

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Description Two Lane Carriageway

Spacing 700 mm and length 640 mm
0.24 PROPOSALS FOR STRUCTURES
The rivers, streams, nallas and canals are mapped from the detailed topography
survey map and Topo Sheets availed from Survey of India. The watersheds of the
rivers/ streams at crossing points have been delineated with the help of Geo
Referenced Survey of India Topo Sheets and cross checked with Google Earth
Imagery. The watershed area, fall in height, total and segmental stream lengths and
corresponding elevations have also been determined with the help of Survey of India
Topo Sheets. The details hydraulic analysis for all major crossing rivers& streams
has been performed as per IRC 05 – 2015 and IRC SP 13 -2014. The clear water
opening & soffit level of the structures are verified against the existing major
structures on downstream & upstream side of the crossing point.
The various types of structures proposed in project corridor is summarized in

following table:
Table 0. 17 Proposals for Structures
Structure Type Reconstruction New Construction Keep Intact Total

Major Creek Bridges(No.) - 01 (2 Lane) - 01
Major Bridges (No.) - - - -
Minor Bridges (No.) - - - -
RCC Box Culverts(No.) - - - -
Proposed HP Culverts(No.) - - - -
0.25 DETAILS OF RETAINING WALL
Details of RE wall provided in project corridor are given below:

Table 0. 18 Details of Retaining wall
Left Side of the Road Right side of the Road

Sr.
From To Length From To Length
No.
(Km) (Km) (Km) (Km) (Km) (Km)
1 157+899 158+211 312.00 157+899 158+211 312.00
2 159+551 159+610 59.00 159+551 159+610 59.00
Total 371.00 Total 371.00

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.4.1 Reference Documents
The consultant referred various documents for design of structures to make it safe
and economical. Hence, Indian Roads Congress (IRC) codes were referred for
design of various structures. It recommends suitable options as per practices
followed and acceptable to Government of Maharashtra. The main recommendations
of the document are summarized below:
1. The structural designs are based on the IRC Codes viz. IRC: 18, IRC: 21,
IRC:112 and IRC: 78. The other codes are also to be followed to the extent they
are relevant.
2. The structures are designed for 2-lanes of traffic (with median verge) carrying
70R, Class-„A‟ loading as well as Special vehicle loading.
3. The length of the project bridge passes through creek. Mostly, Pile foundations
have been provided in creek stretch. The choice of the type of foundation, the
depth of founding level and the load-bearing capacity are based on the
geotechnical investigations carried out for specific structures.
4. For the Creek Bridge, adequate clearance is proposed as per navigational
Standards. The same is also reflected in the General arrangement drawings.
5. Creek Bridge has been designed, limiting slopes in approaches not steeper than
3.3%.
0.4.2 The Salient features of Bridge and Approaches
The details of Design of proposed Creek bridge and Approaches are given below.
1 Total Length 1.711 Km

2 Bridge Length 1.340 Km
3 Width of Carriageway Single carriageways of 13.0m with Both
side footpath 1.5m wide.
4 Spanning arrangement 21 Span of 50m each , 1 Span of 62.5m
each, 1 Span of 40m each, 1 Span of 125m
each (Navigational P14-P15)
5 Design Speed 80 kmph
6 Central Median (Open to Sky) -
7 Footpath 1.5m wide on outer side of both
carriageway

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
8 Provisions of utility Additional Load of 0.1T/m shall be

considered on each side of footpath and
necessary arrangement shall be provided as
per site requirements.
9 Decorative Street Lighting At every 30 m interval
10 Navigation Span 1 nos
11 Minimum Clear Horizontal 1 x 100 m
12 Minimum Clear Vertical 30.00 m
13 Type of Foundation Pile Foundation
14 Type of Sub Structure RCC Structure
15 Type of Superstructure Steel Structure
16 Aesthetic Requirement RCC structure with cable stayed bridge
span for Navigation purpose.
17 Inspection Gallery At each Pier cap with proper railing
18 Thickness of Deck Slab 250mm
19 RoW and Carriageway 30m (As per TCS and GAD)
0.4.3 The summary of Design Material
The details material used for the creek bridge are given below,
Sr. No. Item Grade of Concrete

RCC Crash Barrier
1 RCC M-40
(New Jersy Type)
2 Wearing Coat 50mm AC + 25 mm BC
GI. Water Spout & GI
3 100 mm Dia.
Grating
Reinforcement for
4 TMT Fe 500D
RCC work
5 Expansion Joint Strip seal
6 Bearings Spherical Bearing
7 Pile Foundation M40
8 Open Foundation M40
9 Pile Cap M45
10 Pier and Pier Cap M55
11 Pedestal M55
12 Deck Slab M55

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Sr. No. Item Grade of Concrete

13 Ant-Crash barrier M40
0.4.4 Description of the Bridge
After considering numerous geotechnical conditions and Environmental factors at the

bridge site, including technical feasibility and constructability, the project team opted
for a two separate structure for bridge with Steel superstructure and RCC Foundation
and substructure for 2 lane Road Bridge. Bridge site is situated in coastal area with
severe wind condition, saline weather, very high tidal water. As per Service
Environment classification the exposure condition for the bridge is Extreme. The tide
values for Dharamtar Creek are as given below
Tide Levels at Revas Creek
Height (m) above Mean sea Level (MSL)
Mean High Water Springs (MHWS) +3.112
Also, this area falls in earthquake zone–IV. Earthquake zone map of India is shown in Fig.
0.4.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Figure 0. 4 Earthquake Zone of India
0.4.5 Span Arrangement
Main Span of bridge was received based on navigational clearance, geotechnical

data and based upon construction methodology for foundations. Due to thick layer of
marine clay & considering experience of pile foundations it was decided to go with
bored cast in situ piles with permanent liners. Foundation work will be completed
either by using temporary cofferdam made by sheet piles or temporary earth filling.
There are one navigation spans of 120m in creek bridge and non-navigational span
are restricted to 50 m, 62.5 m , 40 m the detailed arrangements are shown in GAD.
The Total no. of spans are 25 with total number of 26 piers.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Horizontal and vertical clearances at Navigation Channel

The navigational channel for the proposed new Agardanda Creek Bridge shall be as
below;
Vertical Clearance
Sr. No. Chainage (Km) Vertical Clearance above Type of Channel

MHWS (3.92m)
1 158+211 to 159+923 Variable as per GAD Non-Navigational
2 159+923 to 159+048 30.00 m Navigational
3 159+048 to 159+551 Variable as per GAD Non-Navigational
Horizontal Clearance
Sr. No. Chainage (Km) Horizontal Clearance (m) Type of Channel

1 158+211 to 159+923 As per GAD Non-Navigational
2 159+923 to 159+048 1 x 100.00 m Navigational
3 159+048 to 159+551 As per GAD Non-Navigational

Volume-VII
Project Summary
Figure 0. 5 Span Arrangement of Bridge (Sectional Elevation for Navigational Span)

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.4.6 Structure at Deck
Considering the corrosion & maintenance the necessary protective coating has
considered for Steel Structure in RCC work and for Super structure. The deck slab
and wearing coat has proposed for Pavement.
Figure 0. 6 Deck Structure
0.5 RE WALL
Details of RE wall provided in project corridor are given below:

Table 0. 19 Details of RE wall
Sr. Left Side of the Road Remraks

No. From (Km) To (Km) Length (m)
1 157+899 158+211 312.00 On both side
2 159+551 159+610 59.00
Total 371.00

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.26 R AND R APPROACH
The resettlement and rehabilitation principles adopted for this project; will provide
compensation, resettlement and Rehabilitation assistance as per RFCTLARR 2013,
to all project affected persons (loss of land, residences, business establishments and
other such immovable properties), including the informal dwellers/ squatters in the
corridor of impact (COI) which is 20m in settlement area and 30m in open area on
the existing alignment. These will be submitted in Draft Resettlement Action Plan.
The primary objective of the RAP is to identify impacts and to plan measures to
mitigate various losses of the Project while the specific objectives are as follows:
 To prepare an action plan for the project affected people for improving or at
least retaining the living standards in the post resettlement period;
 To outline the entitlements for the affected persons for payment of

compensation and assistance for establishing the livelihoods;
 To develop communication mechanism to establish harmonious relationship

between MEGA and Project Affected Persons (PAPs);
 To ensure adequate mechanism expeditious implementation of R&R.
Settlements
The project road passes through Raigad district in the state of Maharashtra. Murud,
and Mhasala Tehsils lies under this section of coastal highway of Raigad districts.
Major part of the project road is passing through Agricultural zone for about 30.0 % in
entire road segment. The Major length of alignment improved due to poor geometry
of existing road; however, the requirement of new land is more, due to dense
population on existing road, the bypasses are proposed to avoid traffic conflict and
accidents. The bypass is finalized after detailed study of the project road.
a) Land
The area required for the improvement including bypass, Widening, Geometrical
Improvement & Realignment is proposed for land acquisition. Proposed road passes
through 3 Villages, which get affected partially.
Following structures will be affected while up gradation of project corridor:

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Table 0. 20 List of affected structures
Sr. No. Type of Structure No of Structures

Nil
0.27 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
The project will have multiple benefits. It will reduce the travel time substantially. In
addition, the improved road will provide other benefits like proposed activity improves
the economic status of the village people along project area. Overall improvement
will be expected in terms of;
 Development and improvement in transportation infrastructure facility will

connect villages with the neighbouring city.
 Improved infrastructure facilities
 Better approach to Medical & Educational services and quick transportation

of perishable goods like fruits, vegetables and dairy products and
 Development of local agriculture and handicrafts
 Development of tourism and pilgrimage
 Vocational and skill development training for youth
 Opening up of opportunities for new occupations
 Improved quality of life for people and so on.
 Transporting, processing and marketing of agricultural products
 Fast and safe connectivity resulting in savings in fuel, travel time and total
transportation cost to the society
 Reduction in accidents
 Reduction in pollution
 Proposed Tree Plantation along the road side, green pockets alongside of
the alignment will have social benefits to the nearby people
 Along with this it is also proposed to have area development, real estate
development, medical facilities, food courts, police stations, public toilets,
petrol pumps. This will definitely add value in the social and financial benefits
in the region

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
 Indirect and direct employment opportunity to people from all skilled,

semiskilled and unskilled streams will act as social benefits
It is assumed that the overall project will boost socio-economic development in the
entire Raigad district region.
0.28 UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN
The details of existing underground utility services, likely to be affected due to the
proposed Project segments were collected from various agencies operating/
maintaining these utilities has been examined for conflict with the proposed Road
Structure and relocation has suggested wherever the situation demands with on-site
protection measures. In the DPR phase, the utilities were identified and provisions
were made in the estimate for its appropriate relocation. The detailed Utility
Relocation, Cost estimates were made in association with concerned departments.
Balance additional provisions suggested by service provider if any will be conducted
during execution at the cost of service provider.
Overhead utilities such as LT line, HT line, and OFC lines were noted in while
carrying out inventory. Provisions of cross ducts at appropriate interval have been
proposed for crossing utilities. The provision of separate utility corridor has been
proposed for the same.
0.29 LEAD CHART
The average lead for different construction materials is worked out based on the
sources of the materials. The lead rates (transportation) are based on the schedule of
rates 2022-23 of Maharashtra.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
Table 0. 21 Lead Chart
LEAD CHART:
Ref SSR 2022-2023 Pages 553 to 560
Sr. Total SSR Page Total Lead
Material Unit
No. Lead Number Charges
Km Rs.
1 Trap metal 40 mm & above m3 5.00 558 263.19
2 Murum m3 3.00 557 219.98
3 Earth m3 3.00 557 219.98
4 Cement MT 5.00 554 164.99
5 Steel MT 5.00 553 164.99
6 Crushed metal m3 5.00 558 263.19
7 Crushed Sand m3 5.00 558 263.19
8 Asphalt MT 147.00 554 1,470.00
9 Rubble from Roadway excavation m3 5.00 557 321.99
0.30 RATE ANALYSIS
The rate analysis has been carried on the basis of STANDARD DATA BOOK for
analysis of rate (First revision) and adopting Schedule of rate provided by
Government of Maharashtra, Public work department, State SOR for year 2022-
2023. The basic rates for each construction items were analysed on the basis of
material study undertaking the prices of construction materials collected from various
sources and on the anticipated distance of source to the site of work. For items
where these rates are not available, the rates were adopted as per previous
experience of the consultant / Market rates and prevailing percentage over these
rates were considered.
0.31 COST ESTIMATE
The cost estimates have been prepared for the project as rigid pavement standard
two lane carriageway with paved shoulder road.
The plan & profile for final selected approved alignment has been prepared and got
approved from MSRDC. Based on it General Arrangement Drawings (GAD) for all
the structures of the project has also been finalized.
In general, the work is to be executed as per IRC 58: 2018 for Rigid Pavement and
Technical Specifications contained in “Specifications Road and Bridge Works” (Fifth
Revision) published in 2013.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.32 ECONOMIC EVALUATION
Project IRR
From economic evaluation of project road, seems that IRR obtained for this project is
more than 12% for the said package. Hence, it indicates that entire project becomes
technically and economically viable to proceed.
0.33 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
MSRDC guided consultant to identify land pocket along corridor to develop tourism
infrastructure to generate the revenue for Government. Consultant has identified land
pockets for tourism developments like Shopping Malls, Sport Centres, Market Space,
Restaurants, bars, etc. Land pockets for 32 hectors (For Package-I) are identified
and MSRDC has put up towards GoM to further actions.
0.34 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
0.34.1 CONCLUSION
Upon deliberations from the detailed engineering studies and studies of various
alignment options, structural proposals, the consultant finally arrived at the following
conclusions for improvement and development of Package – I of project corridor:
The proposed project development will help in:
 Socio-economic development of the area; Reduction in travel time, loss of tourism

revenue, vehicle operation cost;
 This project upon completion will boost the tourism of Raigad district and will
improve the living standard of residents.
 Optimum utilization of existing road and existing land width.
 Easy and Early Construction due to package wise phasing.
 It would satisfy popular long pending demand to establish a dependable through

connectivity without any conflict along west coast in Maharashtra state.
 Improvement of existing road to the possible extent (with improvements of

pedestrian facilities wherever necessary) which will further enhance acceptability.
 The project road link becomes more realistic after completion and operation of
entire Revas to Reddy Coastal Highway.

Volume-
VII
Project
Summary
0.34.2 RECOMMENDATION
The project road is planned to be constructed as rigid pavement along with

improvement of cross drainages, however present riding comfort level and safety
level warrant of either strengthening or new construction of road to reduce VOC and
travel time. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop new CC roads with two
lanes carriageway with paved shoulder for long term solution through Budgetary
provisions. Necessary safeguard shall be taken to protect pedestrians in busy areas
and built up areas. Protective structures for traffic such as parapets, railings,
roadside safety barriers, foot paths, refuge lanes, pedestrian road markings/signals
etc. shall be provided, wherever necessary in accordance with IRC guidelines.
The project road is not financially viable because of its high cost of construction due
to creek bridges and provision of rigid pavement and up gradation of cross
drainages. Therefore, it is recommended to take up work of improvement through
Budgetary provisions to boost the economy of Konkan area which are undeveloped
part of the state. On other hand it stood technically and economically viable. Hence,
it is recommended to move forward.

RFP Vol VII - Project Summary Bankot

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RFP Vol VII - Project Summary Bankot

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RFP Vol VII - Project Summary Bankot

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD

(Government of Maharashtra Undertaking)

Request for Proposal

Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Kolmandla, District

Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.

i M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

GST Goods and Service Tax

ii M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

NIOS National Institute of Open Schooling

TOR Terms of References

iv M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

v M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

vi M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Figure 0. 1 Key Map .............................................................................................................. 3

Table 0. 1 Salient Features of Project ................................................................................... 1

1 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

0.3 NEED OF THE PROJECT

2 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Figure 0. 1 Key Map

0.4 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION

0.4.1 PROPOSED ALIGNMENT

0.4.2 GOVERNMENT APPROVAL

3 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

The proposal of development of coastal highway was discussed in Cabinet infra-

1) Construction of following 3 major creek bridges on proposed alignment

a) Construction of Bridge across Dharmtar creek between Revas- Karanja on

b) Construction of Major Bridge across Bankot Creek between Village kolmandla

c) Construction of Major Bridge across Kelshi Creek on Revas- Reddi Coastal

2) Land acquisition for Geometrical Improvement of the proposed alignment and

4 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

2) Construction of Balance stretches of highway, bypasses and bridges

0.5 OBJECTIVES OF THE SERVICES

0.6 SCOPE OF SERVICES

5 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

0.7 CONSTRUCTION PACKAGES

 Smaller construction packages will result in neutral & competitive bidding.

 Fast JM Process and Possession of Land due to smaller construction

 No effect on routine tourism of the individual regional territory due to division

 It would be possible to get administrative approval for missing creek individual

6 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Figure 0. 2 Key Map of Bankot creek Bridge

7 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

0.8 SALIENT FEATURES OF PROJECT

The salient features of the Project bridge are as given below:

Table 0. 1 Salient Features of Project

Features From km 157+899 to km 159+611

1 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

Features From km 157+899 to km 159+611

1 Total Length 1.340 km

0.9 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

The main scope of “Rehabilitation and Up gradation of Revas-Reddi Coastal

2 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

0.10 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION

The project site of “Revas-Reddi Coastal Highway MSH-04 Construction of

Sr. No. Component Description

0.11 LIST OF VILLAGES

3 M/s. Monarch Surveyors & Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Pune

0.12 DESIGN STANDARDS ADOPTED

0.13 RIGHT OF WAY ROW (ROW)