10.1515 - HTMP 2013 0094
10.1515 - HTMP 2013 0094
10.1515 - HTMP 2013 0094
Haitao Liu*, Yanchong Yu, Weiqing Chen, Qingxian Wang and Guangshun Wang
Fig. 3: Fracture morphology of tensile tested samples: (a) steel 1 at 1150 °C; (b) steel 1 at 1000 °C; (c) steel 2 at 1150 °C; (d) steel 2 at 1000 °C;
(e) steel 4 at 1150 °C; (f) steel 4 at 1000 °C
the Mn/S ratio of the eco-friendly Bi-S based free cutting 3.2 Fracture morphology
steel, in which the S content is around the range of 0.30–
0.35 wt-%, should be greater than 3.5 for hot rolling of The fracture surfaces of the tensile test specimens were
billets without crack development. observed by SEM. The steels with good hot ductility all
556 H.T. Liu et al., Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel
3.3 E
ffect of Mn/S ratio on dynamic
recrystallization
3.4 G
eneration of sulfide inclusions with
different Mn/S ratios Fig. 4: Flow stress–strain curves as function of tensile temperature
for the examined steels (arrows indicate dynamic recrystallization):
The typical longitudinal microstructures of the quenched (a) steel 1; (b) steel 2; (c) steel 4
fractures for steel 1 with the Mn/S ratio of 1.21 were ob-
served using SEM and EDS, and the result was shown in or FeS phases, which have a low melting point [23]. Mean-
Fig. 5. A lot of precipitated phases were observed at while, from Figs. 3a, 3b and 4a, it can also be seen that
the grain boundary. EDS analysis of these precipitated the strength of steel 1 was so poor and this result was
phases revealed that they were Fe-rich (Fe,Mn)S phases mainly caused by the weak grain boundary. In other
H.T. Liu et al., Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel 557
Fig. 5: Typical longitudinal microstructures of quenched fractures for steel 1: (a) microstructure near fracture at 1200 °C; (b) cracks
magnification at 1200 °C; (c) microstructure near fracture at 1150 °C; (d) microstructure near fracture at 1100 °C
Fig. 6: Typical morphologies of the sulfide inclusions on the surface of fractures in steel 1: (a) spherical sulfides; (b) rod-like sulfides;
(c) dendritic or rod-like sulfides; (d) bead or chain-like, fish-bone eutectic, and clusters of fine sulfides
558 H.T. Liu et al., Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel
words, these phases with low melting point would obvi- the low Mn/S ratio in steel 1. Meanwhile, the morphology
ously reduce the strength of the grain boundary and re- of these Fe-rich (Fe,Mn)S phases could be mainly classi-
sulted in the formation of cracks along the grain boundary fied to six types as follows: spherical, rod-like, dendritic
[24]. or rod-like, bead or chain-like, fish-bone eutectic, and
As it is known, most of the sulfide inclusions usually clusters of fine sulfides [26–27]. The typical morphologies
precipitate as MnS in the enriched interdendritic liquid of them were shown in Fig. 6.
at the last stage of solidification during freezing [23–27]. Fig. 7 showed the SEM and EDS photos of the sulfide
However, the data in the phase diagram of Fe-rich Fe-Mn-S inclusions which formed in sequence in steel 1 at 1000
system also shows that an insufficient addition of Mn to S and 900 °C. From Fig. 7, it also can be seen that there was
containing steels would cause the formation of the liquid a higher Fe content in the Fe-rich sulfide phases precipi-
phase or Fe-rich sulfide phase in a peritectic or a eutectic tated later.
mode [28–30]. In addition, the segregation of sulphur in The typical longitudinal microstructures of the
the steel would promote the formation of the Fe-rich quenched fractures for steel 2 with the Mn/S ratio of 2.97
sulfide phases along the grain boundary [28–29]. There- were shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that there were few
fore, in this work, few MnS as primary sulfide inclusions Fe-rich sulfide phases precipitated at 1150 °C (Fig. 8a), but
were formed but many Fe-rich (Fe,Mn)S as secondary many bead or chain-like Fe-rich (Fe,Mn)S phases and
sulfide phases after the primary crystallization of the Fe cracks at 1100 °C along the grain boundary (Fig. 8b) in
phase during solidification, which would be attributed to accord with its worse ductility. Meanwhile, the Fe content
Fig. 7: SEM morphology and EDS analysis of the typical sulfide inclusions formed in sequence for steel 1: (a) 1000 °C; (b) 900 °C
H.T. Liu et al., Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel 559
References
[1] K. Sander, J. Lohse and U. Pirntke, Heavy Metals in Vehicles
‒ Final Report, Institut für Ökologie und Politik GmbH,
Hamburg, pp. 4‒44 (2000).
[2] J. Lohse, K. Sander and M. Wirts, Heavy Metals in Vehicles II
‒ Final Report, Institut für Ökologie und Politik GmbH,
Hamburg, pp. 45‒91 (2001).
[3] R. Philip, B. Volker and E. Ingo, Steel Res. Int., 178(12), 908‒914
(2007).
Fig. 10: Typical SEM photos of the bismuth films segregated along [4] M. Somekawa, M. Kaiso and Y. Matsushima, Kobelco
austenite grain boundary (BES mode): (a) steel 2 at 1050 °C; Technology Review, 24(1), 9‒13 (2001).
(b) steel 4 at 1050 °C [5] L. Vea, SAE Technical Paper on ‘New Steel Bar Products and
Processing for Automotive Applications’, Society of Automotive
Engineers, Detroit, pp. 77‒82 (1997).
Pure Bi has a melting point of 271.3 °C, the bismuth [6] H.T. Liu and W.Q. Chen, Steel Res. Int., 83(12), 1172‒1179
films present at austenite grain boundary would exist (2012).
as liquid forms at the testing temperatures and would sig- [7] J. Klapsia, Hutnicke Listy, 58(9), 18‒19 (2003).
[8] J. Klapsia and E. Karczmarczyk, Hutnicke Listy, 55(10), 36‒38
nificantly reduce the strength of the grain boundary and
(2000).
cause grain boundary embrittlement. Therefore, the seg- [9] Y. Kim, H. Kim, S.Y. Shin, K. Rhee, S.B. Ahn, D.L. Lee, N.J. Kim
regation of bismuth along grain boundary also would be and S. Lee, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 42, 3095‒3105 (2011).
harmful to the hot ductility of the eco-friendly Bi-S based [10] S.K. Cho, J. Korean Inst. Met. Ma., 34(7), 822‒829 (1996).
free cutting steel in addition to the lower Mn/S ratio. [11] H. Kim, M. Kang, S.Y. Shin and S. Lee, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 568,
8‒19 (2013).
[12] Y. Kim, H. Kim, S.Y. Shin, K. Rhee, S.B. Ahn, D.L. Lee, N.J. Kim
and S. Lee, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 43(3), 882‒892 (2012).
4 Conclusions [13] K. Oikawa, H. Ohtani, K. Ishida and T. Nishizawa, ISIJ Int., 35(4),
402‒408 (1995).
The hot ductility of the eco-friendly Bi-S based free cutting [14] L.K. Bigelow and M.C. Flemings, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 6(2),
steel was found to depend on the Mn/S ratio, and the 275‒283 (1975).
[15] G.A. Toledo, O. Campo and E. Lainez, Steel Research, 64(6),
Mn/S ratio of the steel should be greater than 3.5 for hot
292‒299 (1993).
rolling of billets without crack development. [16] E. López-Chipres, C. Maldonado, A. Bedolla-Jacuinde,
The low Mn/S ratio could restrain the occurrence M. EI-Wahabi and J.M. Cabrera, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 480(1), 49‒55
of dynamic recrystallization and cause the formation of (2008).
H.T. Liu et al., Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel 561
[17] B. Mintz, R. Abushosha and J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int., 32(2), 241‒249 [24] C. Zhang, E.B. Yue and S.T. Qiu, Continuous Casting, 27(6),
(1992). 6‒10 (2008).
[18] B. Mintz and Z. Mohamed, Mater. Sci. Technol., 4(10), 895‒902 [25] Z.Z. Liu, M. Kuwabara, R. Satake and T. Nagata, ISIJ Int., 49(7),
(1988). 1087‒1093 (2009).
[19] A. Cowley and B. Mintz, Mater. Sci. Technol., 20(11), 1431‒1439 [26] L.K. Bigelow and M.C. Flemings, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 6,
(2004). 275‒283 (1975).
[20] B. Mintz, R. Abu-Shosha and M. Shaker, Mater. Sci. Technol., [27] E.T. Turkdogan, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 6, 663‒664 (1975).
9(10), 907‒914 (1993). [28] H. Ohtani, K. Oikawa and K. Ishida, High Temp. Mat. Processes,
[21] F. Zarandi and S. Yue, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 37(7), 2316‒2320 19(3), 197‒210 (2000).
(2006). [29] G.S. Mann and L.H. Van-Vlack, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 7,
[22] E. López-Chipres, C. Maldonado, A. Bedolla-Jacuinde and J.M. 469‒475 (1976).
Cabrera, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 460, 464‒470 (2007). [30] J. Miettinen and B. Hallstedt, Calphad, 22(2), 257‒273 (1998).
[23] G. Sridhar, S.K. Das and N.K. Mukhopadhyay, Eng. Fail. Anal.,
6(3), 155‒172 (1999).