Quality of Human Resources
Quality of Human Resources
Quality of Human Resources
ECONOMICS ISSUES
ISSN : 2986-0067
E-ISSN : 2986-1284
VOLUME 2 NO 2, 2023
PP: 199-213
University;nurdinbrasit@gmail.com
3Lecturer in Master of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin
University;umar.fauziah@yahoo.com
Abstract.
This study aims to determine: (1) the effect of the quality of human resources, Partial and
Simultaneous Motivation and Compensation for employee performance at the Enrekang sub-
district office, Enrekang district.This research was conducted at the Enrekang sub-district
office, Enrekang Regency, which is located at Jalan Jendral Sudirman No.25, Batili. This
research method is a quantitative descriptive approach. Data collection techniques using
questionnaires and observation methods. Data analysis in this study used validation test
techniques, reliability and multiple linear regression analysis using the SPSS for Windows
version 25 application, with a total sample of 23 respondents. The results of this study indicate
that: 1) The quality of human resources has a partial effect on employee performance at the
Enrekang sub-district office, Enrekang Regency which is characterized by a t count value that
is greater than t table, namely 2.217 > 2.093 . 2) Motivation has a partial effect on employee
performance at the Enrekang sub-district office, Enrekang Regency which is characterized by
a t count value that is greater than t table, namely 2.834 > 2.093. 3) Compensation has a partial
effect on employee performance at the Enrekang sub-district office, Enrekang Regency which
is characterized by a t count value that is greater than t table, namely 5.445 > 2.093 . 4) Quality
of Human Resources, Motivation and Compensation simultaneously influence employee
performance at the Enrekang sub-district office,
Keywords: Quality of Human Resources, Motivation, Compensation and Performance.
A. INTRODUCTION
B. LITERATURE REVIEW
Reliable quality human resources are those who master science, technology,
information, have a commitment to human life and other living things, and have
functional relationships with social and biogeophysical (environment) systems in
sociogeophysical (social) ecosystems which are highly required in sustainable
development (Djaafar , in Martin Wibisono 2007:12). According to (Sedarmayanti: 36),
Competence as an attribute of the quality of Human Resources has a significant effect
on individual performance. Organizational culture has a decisive contribution in
shaping employee behavior.
Reliable quality human resources are those who master science, technology,
information, have a commitment to human life and other living things, and have
functional relationships with social and biogeophysical (environment) systems in
sociogeophysical (social) ecosystems which are highly required in sustainable
development (Djaafar , in Martin Wibisono 2007:12). According to Syamsir Torang
(2013: 53) argues that the factors that influence the character or quality of an
individual in an organization are: compensation, motivation, leadership and conflict.
Motivation
According to Malayau SP Hasibuan (2017: 141) that motivation comes from the
word "movere" which means encouragement or driving force that is only given to
humans, especially to subordinates or followers. Motivation is a function of a person's
motive needs (motive), expectations (expectation) and stimulation (incentive).
Motivation is a series of gifts to encourage employees to take action to achieve a
desired goal. In other words, motivation becomes a force and encouragement to take
action so that employee needs can be met. The motivational process places more
emphasis on the content of needs, but also focuses on how and what goals the
individual is motivated according to (Utaminingsih, in Femy Fransiesca 2022: 45)
Motivation is an energy that moves an individual to try to achieve the expected
goals (Samsiar Torang 2016: 57). Meanwhile, according to Robbins and Judge (in Lisa
Asmira 2022:21) motivation is a process that explains a person's intensity, direction
Compensation
Performance
According to Harsuko (in Hastuti 2021: 39), performance is the extent to which
a person has played for him in carrying out organizational strategy, both in achieving
specific goals related to individual roles and or by showing what is declared relevant
to the organization.
In general, performance is defined as the effort made by someone to carry out
a job where there is a reciprocal relationship between superiors and subordinates to
achieve a goal.
conceptual framework
Increasing a productive workforce, in this case employee performance is highly
prioritized through various efforts to foster enthusiasm for work, it is necessary to pay
attention to supporting factors for employees so that they can improve the
performance of these employees/employees. Therefore, employees need to pay
special attention to the quality of human resources, motivation and compensation.
Based on the theoretical basis that has been stated in the discussion above, therefore
the quality of Human Resources, motivation and compensation that has on
performance is described in the form of a conceptual framework picture.
Compensation H-3
(X3) H-4
C. RESEARCH METHODS
Types of research
This research was carried out in an agency, in this case the Enrekang District
Office, Enrekang Regency, which is located at Jalan Jendral Sudirman No.25, Batili. This
research is planned for approximately two to three months.
D. RESEARCH RESULT
Characteristics of Respondents
1. Characteristics of Respondents Based on Gender
Table 4.1
Based on Respondent's Gender
Gender Number of Percentage (%)
Respondents
Man 16 69.6
Woman 7 30.4
Total 23 100
From table 4.2 above, it can be seen that the highest level of education for
employees is at the undergraduate level with a total of 14 people or 60.9%. then at the
high school education level there were 7 people or 30.4% and the lowest level of
employee education was a Masters degree with 2 people or 8.7%.
2. Reliability Test
Reliability is to measure the questionnaire which is an indicator of the variable.
Question items are said to be reliable if a person's answer to the question is
consistent.According to Sugiyono (2017: 130) states that the reliability test isthe
extent to which measurement results using the same object will produce the same
data.
Table 4.8
Reliability Test Results
Cronbach's Reliability Information
Variable Alpha Standards
HR Quality (X1) 0.622 0.6 Reliable
Motivation (X2) 0.799 0.6 Reliable
Compensation (X3) 0.789 0.6 Reliable
Employee 0.727 0.6 Reliable
Performance (Y)
Source: Primary data processed, 2020
Based on the data presented above in table 4.8, it can be seen that the
Cronbach's alpha value of each research variable is> 0.6. Thus these results can
indicate that each research variable has met the requirements for Cronbach's alpha
value, so it can be concluded that all variables have a high level of reliability.
Results of Hypothesis Testing and Discussion
In this study, questionnaires were distributed to the research sample, namely
employees and temporary employees in the Sub-District Office of Enrekang District. as
many as 23 people. The following describes the results of data analysis based on the
answers of the respondents.
1. Influence of HR quality (x1) partially on employee performance (y), Influence
of motivation (x2) partially on employee performance (y), Effect of
compensation (x3) partially on employee performance (y)
Table 4.9
Results of Multiple Linesr Regression Analysis (Coefficientsa)
UnstandardizedCo Standardized
efficients Coefficients
Model B std. Error Betas t Sig.
1 (Constant) -5,926 2,759 -2,147 045
HR Quality .293 .132 .290 2.217 039
Work .442 .156 .367 2,834 011
Hypothesis testing
The hypothesis testing carried out in this study aims to see how the independent
variables influence the dependent variable. Testing this hypothesis consists of testing
the hypothesis partially (Test T) and testing the hypothesis simultaneously (Test F).
1. coefficient of Determination,
Coefficient This determination is used to determine how much influence the
independent variables have on the dependent variable. From the results of
calculations using the SPSS version 25 program, it can be seen that the coefficient of
determination (R Square) obtained is 0.748. This shows that the independent
variables, namely the quality of human resources, motivation and compensation have
a significant influence on employee performance with a percentage of 74.8%, thus the
employee performance variable can be influenced by other variables, namely 25.2% is
influenced by variables that are not examined in this study.
Table 4.10
Coefficient of Determination (Summary models)
Adjusted R
Model R R Square Square std. Error of the Estimate
1 .865a .748 .709 1012
a. Predictors: (Constant), Compensation, Work Motivation, HR Quality
Source: 2020 data processing
The R square value is 0.748, this indicates that the contribution of the
simultaneous positive influence of the quality of human resources, motivation and
compensation on employee performance is the contribution of other variables outside
the variables in this study.
Table 4.11
Simultaneous Test Results (ANOVAa)
Sum of Mean
Model Squares Df Square F Sig.
1 Regression 57,859 3 19,286 18,845 .000b
residual 19,445 19 1,023
Total 77,304 22
a. Dependent Variable: Employee Performance
b. Predictors: (Constant), Compensation, Work Motivation, HR Quality
Source: 2020 data processing
From the table in the F test or simultaneous test above, the Fcount value is
18.845 with a significance of 0.000. The Ftable is 3.13. Thus it can be concluded that
Fcount > Ftable (18.845 > 3.13) and the probability value is less than 0.05, the
independent variables (quality of human resources, motivation and compensation)
simultaneously affect the dependent variable (employee performance) at the
Enrekang sub-district office , Regency. Enrekang.
Table 4.12
Partial Test (Coefficientsa)
UnstandardizedCo Standardized
efficients Coefficients
Model B std. Error Betas t Sig.
Table 4.13
Path Coefficients Independent Variables (Correlations )
Model Zero-order partial Part
1 (Constant)
From table 4.11 it is known that the partial influence of the human resource
quality variable on employee performance variables is 45.3%, then for the motivation
variable with a partial influence on employee performance variables of 54.5% and the
partial influence of compensation variables on performance variables is 78, 1%.
Discussion of Research Results
1. The results of multiple regression analysis using a partial test found that there
is an influence between the quality of human resources and employee
performance, this is indicated by the t count which is greater than t table,
namely 2.217 > 2.093. These results indicate that the quality of human
resources affects the performance of employees in the Enrekang sub-district
office, Kab. Enrekang.
2. The results of multiple regression analysis using the partial test found that
REFRENCE
Asmira, Lisa. 2022. The effect of work environment and compensation on employee
performance through work motivation on employees of PT.PP.LONSUM TBK
BALOMBESSIE ESTATE, BULUKUMBA DISTRICT. Thesis. Master of
Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin
University.
Amrullah. 2012. The effect of ability, motivation and compensation on employee
performance at the administrative bureau of Hasanuddin University. thesis .
Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business,
Hasanuddin University.
Adamy, Mrbawi.2016. Human Resource Management: Theory, practice and research.