IWSS Lacidogna
IWSS Lacidogna
IWSS Lacidogna
25 – 26 June 2020
Such optimization procedures are generally carried out by means of Finite Element
models2, focusing mostly on diagrid lateral rigidity.
1. Scaramozzino D., Lacidogna G., Carpinteri A. New trends towards enhanced structural efficiency and
aesthetic potential in tall buildings
buildings:: The case of diagrids
diagrids.. Applied Sciences
Sciences,, 10 (2020),
2020), 3917.
3917.
2. Tomei V., Imbimbo M., Mele E. Optimization of structural patterns for tall buildings:
buildings: The case of
diagrids.. Engineering Structures
diagrids Structures,, 171 (2018
2018),
), 280
280--297
297..
3. Lacidogna G., Scaramozzino D., Carpinteri A. A matrix matrix--based method for the structural analysis of
diagrid systems
systems.. Engineering Structures
Structures.. 193 (2019),
2019), 340-
340-352.
352. 2
Introduction
Recently, it has been shown that the optimal diagrid geometry depends on the need
to limit the lateral displacements of the structure or the torsional flexibility4.
Moreover, besides minimizing the lateral and torsional flexibility, the goal is also to
use the lowest amount of structural material as well as to design a structure that is
feasible from a constructing process perspective
perspective..
multi-response
A multi- p multi-
multi-objective
j optimization
p p
process needs therefore to be carried
out to find out the best diagrid geometry to limit both the lateral and torsional
flexibility, as well as the mass and complexity of the structure.
4. Lacidogna G., Scaramozzino D., Carpinteri A. The influence of the geometrical shape on the structural
behavior of diagrid tall buildings under lateral and torque actions.
actions. Developments in the Built Environment.
Environment.
2 (2020),
2020), 100009.
100009.
M. Rostami et al,
al, Evaluation of new hexagrid structural G. Angelucci et al,
al, Diagrid structural systems for Swiss Re Building, Londra, 2004
system in bionic high
high--rise buildings, 4th. Internt.
Internt. Conf. on tall buildings: Changing pattern configuration 180 meters – 40 floors
Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Archithectural and through topological assessments, Struct
Struct.. Design
Development, Barcelona – Spain, 2016
Urban Development, Build., 2017
Tall Spec. Build.,
4
Matrix--based method (MBM) for the structural analysis
Matrix
The proposed method is original and consists in the direct calculation of the
diagrid stiffness matrix (based on the definition of the stiffness coefficients)
coefficients).
It is based on the following assumptions, which are meant to simplify the
mathematical formulation while allowing to capture the global structural
behavior:
{F } = [ K ]{δ }
Diagonal angles
angles:: from 35
35°° to 84
84°°
Total height:
height: 168 m
Total number of floors
floors:: 48
4. Lacidogna G., Scaramozzino D., Carpinteri A. The influence of the geometrical shape on the structural
behavior of diagrid tall buildings under lateral and torque actions.
actions. Developments in the Built Environment.
Environment.
8
2 (2020),
2020), 100009.
100009.
Response variables
2. Tomei V., Imbimbo M., Mele E. Optimization of structural patterns for tall buildings:
buildings: The case of
diagrids.. Engineering Structures
diagrids Structures,, 171 (2018),
2018), 280-
280-297.
297.
4. Lacidogna G., Scaramozzino D., Carpinteri A. The influence of the geometrical shape on the structural
behavior of diagrid tall buildings under lateral and torque actions.
actions. Developments in the Built Environment.
Environment. 9
2 (2020),
2020), 100009.
100009.
Desirability function
0 0 0 0
0.831 0.845 0.850 0.855
0.952 0.956 0.959 0.959
0.851 0.851 0.851 0.850
0.895 0.888 0.886 0.881
0.249 0.206 0.186 0
The outcomes can also be plotted onto surface representations, where the
maximum
i off the
th surface
f corresponds
d tot the
th optimal
ti l geometrical
t i l
configuration..
configuration
12
Conclusions and future works
Considering a 168 meter tall building, we found that the diagonal angle is
tthee most
ost important
po ta t pa
parameter
a ete tthat
at aaffects
ects the
t e desirability
des ab ty va value.
ue. Thee
optimal value is found around 65
65°°, with a negligible dependence on the floor
plan shape.
Moreover, the influence of the building aspect ratio on the optimal geometry
will be investigated.
investigated.