Uncertainties
Uncertainties
www.pmt.education
Sources of uncertainties
Every measurement that is made will have some inherent uncertainty. It is important to
consider if the true value lies in the range that is outlined by the quoted uncertainty.
Experiments should be designed with an attempt to reduce the uncertainty in each value and
therefore the outcome of the experiment. Procedures should be used so that individual
uncertainties are minimised in order to provide a realistic value and uncertainty for the outcome.
Longer questions often require an evaluation of arrangements and procedures to assess how
uncertainty could be reduced. This can include discussions on the use of different apparatus
design or procedure. The effect of these changes on experimental results can be different
depending on the specific experimental situation meaning only the experimenter can assess
their impact and usefulness.
www.pmt.education
Readings and measurements
Readings
Uncertainty in a reading for a specific instrument is said to be plus or minus half of the
smallest division.
Example: Thermometer
Only one judgement has to be made (the height of the liquid). Therefore it is a reading and it
can be assumed that the zero value has been correctly set.
A temperature measured using a thermometer with graduations of 1°C is said to have an
uncertainty of ±0.5 °C.
It is common to write down values with the uncertainty, for example, 2.40 ± 0.01 V. It is normally
quoted to the same number of decimal places as the value.
Measurements
Both of the uncertainties in a measurement must be taken into account; the uncertainty of the
zero marker and the uncertainty of the measurement point.
Summary
• The uncertainty of a reading (one judgement) is at least ±0.5 of the smallest scale reading.
• The uncertainty of a measurement (two judgements) is at least ±1 of the smallest scale
reading.
www.pmt.education
Experimental method
The method by which measurements are taken can also affect the uncertainty.
In some situations, resolution of an instrument is not the limiting factor in the uncertainty of a
measurement.
It is considered best practice to write down the full reading and then to write to fewer
significant figures when the uncertainty has been estimated.
Examples:
1. A stopwatch has a resolution of hundredths of a second, but the measurement is likely to
be more affected by the reaction time of the experimenter.
Therefore the full reading on the stopwatch (eg 12.20 s) should be recorded, carrying all
the significant figures for all repeats. The number of significant figures can then be
reduced to a more appropriate value during an averaging process later on.
2. If a digital measuring instrument is being used, the uncertainty cannot be taken from
the last figure in the readout as it is not always the full value. Manufacturers quote the
percentage uncertainties for the different ranges of that specific instrument.
In exams, it can be assumed that the uncertainty in a given value is ±1 the last significant
figure.
Example: Boiling points
A boiling point quoted as being 78 °C can be assumed to have an uncertainty of ±1 °C. It could
be lower than this but without knowing experimental details, there is no evidence to assume
otherwise.
Repeated measurements
Repeating a measurement is a good method for reducing the uncertainty.
In some experiments, it allows anomalies (values that lie far away from the general trend of the
other measurements) to be identified more easily. These outlying results can then be removed
from the data set before calculating a mean.
On other occasions, outliers can be important to include and so uncertainty can be found
using a different method. If measurements are repeated, the uncertainty can be calculated by
finding half the range of the measured values.
Example: Distance
www.pmt.education
From this, percentage uncertainty can be found by dividing the uncertainty by the mean
distance and multiplying it by one hundred.
The method required to be used in an exam question will be made clear in the wording of the
question.
Titrations:
Titres 1 and 3 are concordant so can be averaged to find a mean titre volume of 23.23 cm3.
The total error in a titre is a result of three factors:
This depends on the glassware used, as some burettes are calibrated to a higher accuracy
than others.
www.pmt.education
Uncertainties in exams
In exam questions, it will be made clear whether the question is asking for the uncertainty of a
reading, a measurement, or given data to be calculated.
Mark schemes will allow sensible alternative answers and will credit clear working
methods.
It can be helpful to read the examiner report to see the common mistakes that are made to
help improve answers to practical questions.
Uncertainty in a gradient can be found using two lines drawn on the graph:
● The “best” line of best fit.
● Either the steepest or shallowest gradient line of best fit possible from the data.
The gradient of each line should then be found, and the uncertainty calculated using:
percentage uncertainty = |best gradient−worst gradient| × 100%
The modulus bars in this equation mean that this value will always be positive.
Percentage uncertainty in the y-intercept can also be found using the same method with the
varying intercept values.
www.pmt.education
Combining uncertainties
When adding or subtracting values, the individual absolute uncertainty in each value is
added to find the total uncertainty.
When multiplying or dividing values, the individual percentage uncertainty in each value is
added to find the total uncertainty.
When a value is raised to a power, the percentage uncertainty is multiplied by the same
value as the power.
Summary
(taken from the AQA Chemistry Practical Handbook)
www.pmt.education