Optimum-Cost-Based Renewable Energy Chart Considering Micro-Hydro, solar-PV, and Hybrid Systems Using HOMER Suitable For Eastern Himalayan Regions of India
Optimum-Cost-Based Renewable Energy Chart Considering Micro-Hydro, solar-PV, and Hybrid Systems Using HOMER Suitable For Eastern Himalayan Regions of India
Optimum-Cost-Based Renewable Energy Chart Considering Micro-Hydro, solar-PV, and Hybrid Systems Using HOMER Suitable For Eastern Himalayan Regions of India
Corresponding Author:
Adikanda Parida
Department of Electrical Engineering, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology
Nirjuli, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Email: adikanda_2003@yahoo.co.in
NOMENCLATURE
𝑈𝑑𝑠 , 𝑈𝑞𝑠 : 2-axis stator voltages of the DFIG 𝐿𝑠 : DFIG stator self-inductance
𝑈𝑑𝑟 , 𝑈𝑞𝑟 : 2-axis rotor voltages of the DFIG 𝑃𝑟 : Rotor active power of the DFIG
𝐼𝑑𝑠 , 𝐼𝑞𝑠 : 2-axis stator currents of the DFIG 𝑃𝑛𝑒𝑡 : Rotor active power of the DFIG
𝐼𝑑𝑟 , 𝐼𝑞𝑟 : 2-axis rotor currents of the DFIG 𝑄𝑠 : Power at load bus
𝐿𝑚 : DFIG magnetizing inductance 𝑄𝑠∗ : Stator reactive power of the DFIG
𝑃𝑠 : Stator active power of the DFIG 𝜔𝑒 : Reference reactive power of the DFIG
𝑅𝑠 , 𝑅𝑟 : Stator and rotor resistances of the DFIG 𝜔𝑟 : Frequency of the DFIG stator flux
Supercripts: (𝑠, 𝑟, 𝑒): Stator, rotor, synchronous reference frames
1. INTRODUCTION
Almost 70% of global energy needs have been fulfilled with the burning of fossil fuels which
significantly contributes to greenhouse carbon emissions. Emissions from thermal and gas turbine power units
are significant contributors to greenhouse carbon emissions. To address the global climatic change issues, the
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention was brought up with quantified and legal
bindings to greenhouse gas emissions [1], [2]. The mentioned bindings were reflected in the form of carbon
tax and high energy bills in many developing countries where energy demand increases exponentially [3]. To
avoid the financial and legal bindings, expansion of renewable energy generation and its technology
upgradation was the only feasible option for the energy planners.
Energy cost plays a vital role in the expansion, competition, and implementation of renewable energy
generation projects. To address this issue, proper renewable energy planning is the need of the hour [4].
Therefore, nonconventional energy integration with the already existing energy supply as the distributed
generation has become the need of the hour to minimize the energy demand deficit within the Kyoto Protocol
framework [5]. Renewable energy capacity addition requires energy planning and energy management [6]–[9].
Therefore, energy planning and energy management must be operated concurrently to maximize renewable
energy generation at a minimum cost. Considering the criteria for the renewable energy composition chart, the
cost of renewable energy and its availability is the key factor that influences all other factors mentioned in the
abstract section. Therefore, renewable energy planning and its technology development must be directed by
mentioned two key factors.
Discontinuity of energy supply from renewable sources is a major limitation. However, properly
analyzing the power generation tendency, another renewable energy source that possesses the complementary
nature of the parent source shall be selected for hybridization [10]–[14]. A storage battery augmented solar-
PV based renewable energy supplied smart building energy management system has been proposed in [15].
However, the integration of a large storage battery is not cost effective and environmentally friendly [16].
Therefore, optimum sizing of integrated renewable energy systems is essential to target the load pattern of the
load [17]–[19]. In a different technological dimension, some researchers also suggest the adoption of renewable
energy not only addresses the climatic change issues but also will unburden the power sector economically as
it reduces power theft [20], [21]. This is true to some extent. However, improper renewable energy capacity
augmentation at individual load terminals as suggested in [20], [21] is not economically viable [22]. A similar
type of renewable energy architecture using multiple energy inputs has been proposed [23]. Over the last few
years, effectual research is going on to come up with appropriate integration of conventional energy input with
its non-conventional counterparts. In this track, the presented research as reported in [24]–[28] is helpful to
limit the overloading of the utility supply. However, the involvement of large storage batteries in these systems
is not appreciable. A solar-PV and micro-hydro hybrid generation-based energy system is presented in [29]. In
this case also, due to improper load matching, a large number of storage batteries are required. Therefore, the
scheme proposed in [29] is not cost-effective. For all smart systems energy efficiency must be high and energy
cost must be as low as possible [30]. While planning for the rural area energy needs, the configuration of a
smart village energy load has been taken into account and properly analyzed in this paper. The presented paper
considers the proper augmentation of locally available renewable energy sources for hybridization. The
significant contribution of this paper can be summarized as follows: i) The availability of matching optimum
cost renewable power at the load terminals with minimum battery backup; ii) Implementation of equality
constraint criteria technique for load sharing among selected renewable sources for minimum energy cost; and
iii) Moreover, the availability of low-cost renewable energy at the load center is an encouraging factor for rural
electrification in terms of consumer friendliness.
Case-Study Region
Int J Appl Power Eng, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2023: 126-135
Int J Appl Power Eng ISSN: 2252-8792 129
of lighting, fan, AC, PC, and motors. Except for rest days, the class hours in the institute are for 8 hours between
8 a.m., and 5 p.m. As shown in Table 1, the load on the Feeder-2 is illumination, AC, and fans and the
operational time on working days is 7 hours/day and 18 hours/day on nonworking days. The probability for
computation of time of operation is 0.8. The load on Feeder-3 is almost similar to Feeder-2. Similarly, the
working hours for administrative premises is almost 7 hours/day and 5 days/week. The load on Feeder-4 is
almost similar to Feeder-2. For the presented study, the loading time for the residential area was considered to
be 17 hours/day (6 a.m. to 11 a.m. of a day). During the analysis, the street light luminaries within the institute
complex were found to be of 80 watts capacity and the has been assigned to Feeder-5.
(a)
(b)
Figure 4. Energy demand pattern (a) single line representation of the load considered for case-study and
(b) load profile (daily average) of the organization considered for case-study
During reduced water flows into the reaction turbine, to maintain 1 p.u stator power and rated stator
voltage level, the rotor side converter (RSC) will inject the additional power through the DFIG rotor drawn
from the DC-link with the help of the presented controller. Moreover, the surplus power available in the DC-
link will be delivered to the AC-link using a grid side converter (GSC) as shown in Figure 5. In the complete
model of the proposed generation system, an appropriate amount of dummy load arrangement is essential if
the system needs to be operated in standalone mode. However, for the testing purpose, the proto-type hybrid
generation system is operated in grid-connected mode and hence there is no need for a dummy load. In the
presented system, for lab experiment purposes, an arrangement for a small battery charging unit has been made
which may be utilized in the future for electric vehicle charging.
Both active and reactive power control of the DFIG which is considered to be the reference energy
source for energy planning through the energy trade-off process is accomplished through two control loops
(10). The instantaneous active power is compared with the reference active power which is the active power
rating of the DFIG set d-axis rotor current. Similarly, in the second loop, the instantaneous active power is
compared with the reference reactive power which is set equal to 0 kVAR. This is because the system is
supposed to operate at the unit power factor. For the proposed scheme, the availability of power at the load bus
is ensured through either one of the following generation schedules in a day:
i) Both micro-hydro generators and solar-PV systems feed the power.
ii) Micro-hydro generator is only feeding the power.
iii) Solar-PV system is only feeding the power.
iv) Neither the micro-hydro generator nor the solar-PV system feeds the power.
The schedule mentioned in (iv) is the rarest of rare cases. Where the backup option is either infeasible
or not economically viable. Rather, power is supplemented by the utility for the presented scheme. Similarly,
the generation schedule mentioned in (i) is a natural and definite phenomenon and occurs for 7 hours. (9.0am-
4.0pm) every day in a clear sky situation. Where excess power will be delivered to the utility if it is grid
connected system or allowed to dissipate in a dummy load for a standalone system. However, the power
schedule mentioned in (ii) and (iii) needs a very small storage battery backup. Where the capacity of the storage
battery is much less than the existing schemes.
Ps Transformer P = P P ' ( )
AC Load
net s r
Utility
Controller
jγ slip
DC Q =0 *
I qre
(I )
L
(U )
ref ref
e
e e
U crref qr dr 2 Ps
PI_4 PI_2
(U ) r ref
r Electric Vehicles
I dre Ps*
GSC
PWM
AC
DC
Buck-Boost
Solar PV generation Regulator
Cd DC-Link Vdc
Int J Appl Power Eng, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2023: 126-135
Int J Appl Power Eng ISSN: 2252-8792 131
Figure 6. Availability of solar radiation and status of the storage battery backup
5.3. If the total load assigned to micro-hydro and solar-PV hybrid generation system
𝑒
Considering, 𝑝𝑔𝑖 as the total power fed from both the renewable sources selected and 𝑝𝑑𝑒 as the average
demand in the trade-off region. Therefore, the energy cost function can be defined as (1).
𝐶 = ∑2𝑖=1 𝐶𝑖 (𝑝𝑔𝑖
𝑒
) (1)
∑2𝑖=1 𝑝𝑔𝑖
𝑒
− 𝑝𝑑𝑒 = 0 (2)
therefore, expressing (1) using the Lagrange multiplier function ( ) can be defined as (3).
𝐶 = ∑2𝑖=1 𝐶𝑖 (𝑝𝑔𝑖
𝑒
) − 𝜆[∑2𝑖=1 𝑝𝑔𝑖
𝑒
− 𝑝𝑑𝑒 ] (3)
𝜕𝐶 𝑑𝐶1 𝑑𝐶2 𝑒
For energy cost minimization, 𝑒 = 0. Therefore, 𝑒 = 𝑒 = 𝜆. Where 𝑝𝑔1 is the active power generation
𝜕𝑝𝑔𝑖 𝑑𝑝𝑔1 𝑑𝑝𝑔2
𝑒
from the solar-PV unit, 𝑝𝑔2 is the active power generation from the micro-hydro generation unit, and
Optimum-cost-based renewable energy chart considering micro-hydro … (Adikanda Parida)
132 ISSN: 2252-8792
($/kWh) is the incremental cost of energy. The generation capacity from both sources must match with the
average demand between 9 a.m.-4 p.m. which is 1,260 kW. Therefore, the constraints for optimization are:
The cost of energy (COE) in-case of only micro-hydro generation is 0.14$/kWh and that for solar-PV is
0.175$/kWh. Therefore, the incremental COE can be (5).
𝑒 𝑒
𝐼𝐶1 = 0.175𝑝𝑔1 , 𝐼𝐶2 = 0.14𝑝𝑔2 (5)
From (5), the maximum value of 𝜆 is 220.5. As per the constraints in (4), the optimum allocation of load
between the mentioned renewable sources of energy for minimum total energy can be seen in Table 3.
It has been observed in the Himalayan region that the water flow in the case of a micro-hydro type of
plant as proposed in this paper is highly dependent on rainfall. Therefore, micro-hydro and solar-PV generation
are complementary to each other. Therefore, for the proposed analysis, solar-PV is proposed to be integrated
with the micro-hydro generation system to supply the average power required by the load during the availability
of solar-PV power. Otherwise, the supply will be from the micro-hydro generation system. The benefit of the
proposed scheme is that it can be realized with no or minimum battery backup.
For this case study, to generate an average power of 560 kW from solar-PV, 600 kW of solar-PV
generation plant has been recommended with 100 Ah of the storage battery. The cost of energy from the solar-
PV with a marginal storage battery to supplement power between 9 a.m.-4 p.m. has been computed using the
HOMER Pro-3.2 software tool. The same has been presented in Table 4. The COE, in this case, is $0.145
which is comparable with the COE of the micro-hydro generation system. Therefore, considering the average
load profile of the load center as shown in Figure 4(b), 14 units of micro-hydro generators 50 kW each and
600 kW of solar-PV generation system are proposed for the mentioned designated load
Int J Appl Power Eng, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2023: 126-135
Int J Appl Power Eng ISSN: 2252-8792 133
was very limited scope for the extended experiment on the practical systems. However, some of the vital test
results were captured and presented in Figure 8. As shown in Figure 8, it has been observed that by varying the
water flow, the speed of the DFIG rotor varies continuously. However, the active power at the stator of the
DFIG remains constant as the power fluctuation in the DFIG is adjusted through a power exchange between
the DC-link and the rotor of the DFIG. However, the net power fluctuates at the load bus. This can be minimized
through the augmentation of appropriate dummy loads at the load bus.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 7. Active power sharing (a) DFIG rotor power response to turbine power output; (b) Utility power input
variation in response to the wind turbine output variations; (c) Utility power input variation in response to the
solar-PV power output variations; and (d) DC-link voltage profile of the proposed hybrid generation scheme
Figure 8. DFIG stator and net active power variation in response to rotor speed variation
7. CONCLUSION
The renewable energy chart for minimum COE has been successfully mathematically formulated and
implemented using HOMER Pro-3.2. The equality constraint criteria technique was adopted for the
mathematical formulation of the problem. The proposed renewable energy-based hybrid energy system suitable
for rural electrification was initially simulated using the MATLAB Simulink platform. During the simulation,
it has been observed that the proposed control model was appropriately participating in the energy exchange
process. The simulated model has been implemented using a proto-type 3 kW micro-hydro and 3 kW solar-PV
systems using suitable controllers. It has been observed that the COE when the load is independently supplied
with the micro-hydro system is the lowest @$0.14/kWh. However, power generation from such units is highly
dependent on rainwater as these systems are realized through small reservoirs. As the solar-PV generation is
almost commentary to micro-hydro generation in the mentioned locality as experienced, it is considered for
augmentation to overcome the above-mentioned limitations of the micro-hydro generation unit. When it is
attempted to calculate the COE for solar-PV with battery back-up to supplement the total load, it is found to
be @$0.145/kWh and without battery back-up @$0.142/kWh. Therefore, to overcome the limitations like the
continuity of power supply from both generation options, energy cost limitations of solar-PV, and demography
of the load center, micro-hydro, and solar-PV-based hybrid generation arrangement is recommended. In the
recommended hybrid generation case, the COE is found to be @$0.142/kWh. Though, the COE of the hybrid
generation system is marginally higher than the standalone micro-hydro generation system, considering the
continuity of power supply, this marginally higher energy cost is within the accepted range. However, some
more accurate economic analyses shall be considered using more advanced software platforms for more
accurate COE.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the DST, Govt. of India, for providing financial support for this research
work through the project DST/SEED/TITE/2017(G). Without their support, it would not have been possible
for us to complete this research project work.
REFERENCES
[1] Å. Rosenqvist, A. Milne, R. Lucas, M. Imhoff, and C. Dobson, “A review of remote sensing technology in support of the Kyoto
Protocol,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 441–455, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00070-4.
[2] X. gang Zhao, L. Wu, and A. Li, “Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China,” Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, vol. 79, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.034.
[3] Z. Jia and B. Lin, “Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
vol. 159, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120187.
[4] J. Yuan, C. Farnham, and K. Emura, “Development and application of a simple BEMS to measure energy consumption of
buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 109, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.012.
[5] M. S. Zefreh, T. D. Todd, and G. Karakostas, “Energy provisioning and operating costs in hybrid solar-powered infrastructure,”
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 986–994, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2319239.
[6] F. Pilo, G. Pisano, and G. G. Soma, “Optimal Coordination of Energy Resources With a Two-Stage Online Active Management,”
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 4526–4537, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2107717.
[7] P. Palensky and D. Dietrich, “Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 381–388, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2158841.
[8] D. Han and J. Lim, “Smart home energy management system using IEEE 802.15.4 and zigbee,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer
Electronics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1403–1410, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TCE.2010.5606276.
[9] R. Velik and G. Zucker, “Autonomous perception and decision making in building automation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3645–3652, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2009.2038985.
[10] A. Parida, S. Choudhury, and D. Chatterjee, “Microgrid Based Hybrid Energy Co-Operative for Grid-Isolated Remote Rural Village
Power Supply for East Coast Zone of India,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1375–1383, 2018, doi:
10.1109/TSTE.2017.2782007.
[11] A. Parida and D. Chatterjee, “Cogeneration topology for wind energy conversion system using doubly-fed induction generator,”
IET Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1406–1415, 2016, doi: 10.1049/iet-pel.2015.0581.
[12] A. Parida and D. Chatterjee, “Stand-alone AC-DC microgrid-based wind-solar hybrid generation scheme with autonomous energy
exchange topologies suitable for remote rural area power supply,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol.
28, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1002/etep.2520.
[13] A. Parida and D. Chatterjee, “Integrated DFIG–SCIG‐based wind energy conversion system equipped with improved power
generation capability,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 3791–3800, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1049/iet-
gtd.2016.1246.
[14] A. Parida and D. Chatterjee, “Model-based loss minimisation scheme for wind solar hybrid generation system using (grid-
connected) doubly fed induction generator,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 548–559, 2016, doi: 10.1049/iet-
epa.2016.0040.
[15] P. Zhao, S. Suryanarayanan, and M. G. Simoes, “An energy management system for building structures using a multi-agent
decision-making control methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 322–330, 2013, doi:
10.1109/TIA.2012.2229682.
[16] Z. Wang, C. Gu, F. Li, P. Bale, and H. Sun, “Active demand response using shared energy storage for household energy
Int J Appl Power Eng, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2023: 126-135
Int J Appl Power Eng ISSN: 2252-8792 135
management,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1888–1897, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2258046.
[17] A. Chauhan and R. P. Saini, “Discrete harmony search based size optimization of Integrated Renewable Energy System for remote
rural areas of Uttarakhand state in India,” Renewable Energy, vol. 94, pp. 587–604, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.079.
[18] I. Kougias, S. Szabó, F. Monforti-Ferrario, T. Huld, and K. Bódis, “A methodology for optimization of the complementarity between
small-hydropower plants and solar PV systems,” Renewable Energy, vol. 87, pp. 1023–1030, Mar. 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.073.
[19] A. S. Brouwer, M. van den Broek, W. Zappa, W. C. Turkenburg, and A. Faaij, “Least-cost options for integrating intermittent
renewables in low-carbon power systems,” Applied Energy, vol. 161, pp. 48–74, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.090.
[20] M. A. A. Pedrasa, T. D. Spooner, and I. F. MacGill, “Coordinated Scheduling of Residential Distributed Energy Resources to
Optimize Smart Home Energy Services,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 134–143, 2010, doi:
10.1109/TSG.2010.2053053.
[21] C. O. Adika and L. Wang, “Autonomous appliance scheduling for household energy management,” IEEE Transactions on Smart
Grid, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 673–682, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2271427.
[22] F. Corno and F. Razzak, “Intelligent energy optimization for user intelligible goals in smart home environments,” IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2128–2135, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2214407.
[23] X. Guan, Z. Xu, and Q. S. Jia, “Energy-efficient buildings facilitated by microgrid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no.
3, pp. 243–252, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2010.2083705.
[24] N. Sasidharan, N. Madhu M., J. G. Singh, and W. Ongsakul, “An approach for an efficient hybrid AC/DC solar powered Homegrid
system based on the load characteristics of home appliances,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 108, pp. 23–35, 2015, doi:
10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.051.
[25] V. Kapsalis and D. Karamanis, “On the effect of roof added photovoltaics on building’s energy demand,” Energy and Buildings,
vol. 108, pp. 195–204, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.016.
[26] G. Mokhtari, G. Nourbakhsh, F. Zare, and A. Ghosh, “Improving the penetration level of PVs using DC link for residential
buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 72, pp. 80–86, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.007.
[27] H. Fathabadi, “Increasing energy efficiency of PV-converter-battery section of standalone building integrated photovoltaic
systems,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 101, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.024.
[28] K. Qian, C. Zhou, M. Allan, and Y. Yuan, “Modeling of load demand due to EV battery charging in distribution systems,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 802–810, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2057456.
[29] R. Syahputra and I. Soesanti, “Renewable energy systems based on micro-hydro and solar photovoltaic for rural areas: A case study
in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 472–490, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.015.
[30] S. Bharany et al., “Energy-efficient clustering scheme for flying ad-hoc networks using an optimized leach protocol,” Energies,
vol. 14, no. 19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14196016.
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Adikanda Parida received the M.Tech. degree in industrial systems and drives
from RGPV, Bhopal, India, 2005, and a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering department
from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. His research interests include hybrid renewable
power generation, rural electrification, energy conservation, and management. He is a
member of IEEE. He can be contacted at email: ap@nerist.ac.in.
Bikuk Lomdak received the M.Tech. degree in power systems from North
Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, Nirjuli, India, 2021, and pursuing a
Ph.D. degree in North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, Nirjuli, India,
His research interests include hybrid renewable power generation. He can be contacted at
email: bikukupsc@gmail.com.