Research Methodology Module - 03 Notes
Research Methodology Module - 03 Notes
Research Methodology Module - 03 Notes
Patents: Conditions for Obtaining a Patent Protection, To Patent or Not to Patent an Invention.
Rights Associated with Patents. Enforcement of Patent Rights. Inventions Eligible for Patenting.
Non-Patentable Matters. Patent Infringements. Avoid Public Disclosure of an Invention before
Patenting. Process of Patenting. Prior Art Search. Choice of Application to be Filed. Patent
Application Forms. Jurisdiction of Filing Patent
Application. Publication. Pre-grant Opposition. Examination. Grant of a Patent. Validity of
Patent Protection. Post-grant Opposition. Commercialization of a Patent. Need for a Patent
Attorney/Agent. Can a Worldwide Patent be Obtained. Do I Need First to File a Patent in India.
Patent Related Forms. Fee Structure. Types of Patent Applications. Commonly Used Terms in
Patenting. National Bodies Dealing with Patent Affairs. Utility
Models.
Process of Patenting. Prior Art Search. Choice of Application to be Filed. Patent Application
Forms. Jurisdiction of Filing Patent Application. Publication. Pre-grant Opposition. Examination.
Grant of a Patent. Validity of Patent Protection. Post-grant Opposition. Commercialization of a
Patent. Need for a Patent Attorney/Agent. Can a Worldwide Patent be Obtained. Do I Need First
to File a Patent in India. Patent Related
Forms. Fee Structure. Types of Patent Applications. Commonly Used Terms in Patenting.
National Bodies Dealing with Patent Affairs. Utility Models.
Creativity being the keystone of progress, no civilized society can afford to ignore the
basic requirement of encouraging the same.
The economic and social development of a society is largely dependent on creativity.
The protection provided by the IPR to the creators/innovators is in fact an act of
incentivization for encouraging them to create more and motivates others to create new
and novel things.
However, if IPR is practised rigidly, it may have a negative impact on the progress of
society.
For example, compliance with the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS)
Agreement has affected the farming community as they are unable to store seeds for the
next crop.
Multinational companies regulate the price of seeds, which is generally beyond the reach
of a majority of the farmers.
To circumvent the negative impact of IPR, certain laws, exceptions and limitations
associated with IPR have been enacted to maintain a balance between the interests of the
creators/inventors and the community.
For example, farmers‘ rights under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers‘ Rights
(PVP&FR) Act, 2001 entitles them to many privileges, such as ‗Rights on seeds’
provides rights to the farmers to save seeds, use seeds and share, exchange or sell seeds to
1.2. IP Governance
Since IP is an integral component of human society, each and every nation has dedicated
agencies for laying out the guidelines, implementation and enforcement of IP related
matters.
In India, many organizations/agencies deal with various aspects of IP.
The governance of all categories of IP, except the Plant Variety and Farmers‘ Rights Act,
is carried out by the Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (DPIIT)
under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, GoI.
There are a few other dedicated organizations/departments established by the government
to promote patent-ecosystem (patent awareness, patent filing and patent
commercialization) in India e.g. Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment
Council (TIFAC), National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) and Cell for
IPR Promotion and Management (CIPAM), etc.
In order to create a hassle-free exchange of IP related activities amongst all the nations, it
is imperative to have minimum standards of rules and regulations pertaining to all aspects
of IP including rights, empowerment, exceptions, etc.
To achieve this goal, the United Nations (UN) has established an organization called the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
This agency is at the forefront of imparting knowledge about IP and governs international
filing and registration of IP through various Conventions and Treaties like Paris
IP, especially patents, is considered as one of the important cogs in assessing the
innovation index of a nation.
The global ranking organizations always have IP or a subset of IP as one of the
parameters for understanding and grading the Science, Technology and Innovation (STI)
ecosystem of a nation.
For example, the Scimago (publically available online portal which ranks journals and
countries based on the data taken from Scopus) 2020 report ranked India at 4th position
in the parameter of a number of ‗Research Publications‘, and 50th position in the
parameter of ‗Intellectual Property Rights‘.
The global ranking can be improved by sensitizing the teaching and scientific
communities about the importance of IP and creating infrastructure for the same in the
institutes of higher learning.
1.4. Origin of IP
Though there is no official record of the origin of IP, it is believed that a rudimentary
form of IP was being practised around 500 Before the Common Era (BCE) in Sybaris, a
state of Greece.
The natives of Sybaris were granted a year‘s protection for using their intellect to create
―any new improvement in luxury.‖
A practical and pragmatic approach for IP governance started taking shape in medieval
Europe. In 1623, Britain passed an Intellectual Property Legislation which entitled guilds
(association of artisans or merchants) to create innovations and bring them to market for
trade purposes.
However, this legislation brought a lot of resentment amongst the public, and thus was
replaced by the ‗Statute of Monopolies‘, which gave the rights to the original
creator/inventor for 14 years.
Another legislation, ‗Statute of Anne‘, was passed by the British parliament in 1710.
This legislation aimed at strengthening copyrights by providing rights to the authors for
recreation and distribution of their work.
The work could also be renewed for another 14 years. By the end of the 18 th century and
the beginning of the 19th century, almost every country started laying down IP legislation
to protect their novel inventions and creations.
1.5.1. Patents
The history of the Indian patent system dates back to the pre independence era of British
rule.
The first patent related legislation in India was Act VI of 1856, adapted from the British
Patent Law of 1852.
The objective of this legislation was to encourage the inventions of new and useful
manufactures.
The rights conferred to the inventor were termed as ‗Exclusive Privileges‘.
In 1859, certain amendments were made to the Act, such as: Grant of exclusive privileges
to useful inventions.
Increase of priority time from 6 months to 12 months.
Exclusion of importers from the definition of the inventor.
The world’s first patent was granted in 1790 to Samuel Hopkins in USA for the "making of pot
ash and pearl ash by a new apparatus and process". In India, the first patent (known as
‘Exclusive Privileges’ at that time) was awarded in 1856 to a civil engineer, George Alfred
DePenning from Calcutta, for his invention, ‘An Efficient Punkah Pulling Machine’.
A few years later, it was felt that ‗Designs‘ could also pass the criteria of the invention and thus
should be included in the Patent Act. The new Act was rechristened as ―The Patterns and
Designs Protection Act‖ under Act XIII of 1872.
This Act was further amended in 1883 (XVI of 1883) to include the provision of protection for
‗Novelty‘ in the invention.
At the beginning of the 20th century, all the earlier Acts related to inventions and designs were
done away with the introduction of ‗The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911‘ (Act II of 1911).
As per this Act, the governance of patents was placed under the management of the Controller of
Patents. In the next three decades, many amendments were introduced for reciprocal
arrangements with other countries for securing priority dates.
After India got independence in 1947, many patent experts felt the need to review the Indian
Patents and Designs Act, 1911, keeping the national interest (economic and political) in mind.
These recommendations were introduced in the Act XXXII of 1950. Two years later, another
amendment (Act LXX of 1952) was made to provide compulsory licencing of patents related to
food, drugs and chemicals killing insects and microbes.
Based on these amendments, a bill was presented in the parliament in 1953 but was rejected.
In 1957, the central government constituted yet another powerful committee under the
chairmanship of Justice N.
RajagopalaAyyangar to seek inputs for further strengthening the Indian Patent Law.
However, the Indian Patents and Designs Act of 1911 remained applicable for designs only till
1994.
In 1995, India signed the TRIPS Agreement and got a transition period of 10 years (1995-2005)
to make domestic laws compatible with the international treaty.
In 1999, The Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 was introduced providing for the filing of
applications for ‗Product Patents‘ in the areas of drugs, pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals
(earlier, only ‗processes‘ were protected under the Patent Act).
The new Patent Act also included provisions for the grant of Exclusive Market Rights (EMRs)
for the distribution and sale of pharma products on fulfilment of certain conditions.
This Act introduced new Patent Rules, 2003, thus replacing the earlier Patents Rules, 1972.
However, the actual need for copyrights law was felt only after the invention of printers and
copiers. Before the invention of printers, writing could be created only once.
It was highly laborious and the risk of errors was involved in the manual process of copying by a
scribe.
During the 15th and 16th centuries, printing was invented and widely established in Europe.
The term of copyrights was for the lifetime of the author plus seven years after death. Unlike
today, copyrights in work were not automatic.
The registration of copyright was mandatory for the enforcement of rights under the Act.
The government could grant a compulsory license to publish a book if the owner of the
copyright, upon the death of the author, refused to allow its publication.
In the second phase Indian legislature, under the British Raj, enacted the Copyright Act of 1914
based on the Imperial Copyright Act (1911) of the UK. An Act for criminal sanction for an
infringement was introduced.
The Copyright Act 1957 was enacted, superseding the Indian Copyright Act, 1914, in order to
suit the provisions of the Berne Convention (1886).
The 1957 Act has been amended six times (1983, 1984, 1992, 1994 and 1999, 2012), to comply
with WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), 1996 and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty
(WPPT), 1996.
Most of the amendments in copyright laws were in the digital environment, such as penalties for
circumvention of technological protection measures;
rights of management information; liability of internet service provider;
introduction of statutory licenses for the cover versions (the cover version is re-recording or re-
composition of the original song by other artists or composers and is also termed as a remake,
cover song, revival, etc.) and broadcasting organizations;
ensuring the right to receive royalties for authors and usic composers;
exclusive economic and moral rights to performers;
equal membership rights in copyrights societies for authors and other right owners and exception
of copyrights for physically disabled to access any works.
The first statutory law related to Trademarks (TM) in India was the Trade Marks Act, 1940,
which was carved out from the Trade Marks Act, 1938 of the UK.
It was followed by the incorporation of provisions of TM stated in the Indian Penal Code,
Criminal Procedure Code and the Sea Customs Act. Later on, Trade Marks
Act, 1940 was rechristened as Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. Nearly four decades
later, this Act was repealed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
The need for this occurred to comply with the provisions of the TRIPS. It is the current
governing law related to registered TM.
Geographical Indicators have been defined under Article 22 (1) of the WTO Agreement on
TRIPS.
Although India has no specific Trade Secrets Laws, Indian courts have upheld Trade Secrets
protection under various statutes, including contract law, Copyright law, the principles of equity
and the common law action of breach of confidence (which in effect amounts to a breach of
contractual obligation).
In the 21st century, Information Technology (IT) has revolutionized the economic and societal
growth of the world economy.
The rapid and tremendous scientific advancements in the field of IT resulted in the creation of a
new class of IP called the Layout-Design of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits.
Various organizations, including WTO and TRIPS Agreement laid down rules and regulations
regarding the protection of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits and Layout Designs (SICLD)
India being a member of the WTO also passed an Act called the SICLD Act, 2000.
This Act is TRIPS compliant and fulfils the conditions of the TRIPS agreement (Articles. 35 to
38) concerning the protection of SICLD.
Till 1970s, not much emphasis was laid on patentable matter originating from animals and
plants.
However, microbes and microbial products/processes were patentable.
To include all kinds of biological materials under the ambit of patent laws, a decision to enact a
new sui generis law under the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of
Plants (UPOV, 1978) and UPOV, 1991 was taken.
These decisions were taken to address environmental and public interest concerns.
The Indian Patents Act, 1970 excludes ―plants and animals in whole or any part thereof other
than microorganisms‖ from patentability.
To comply with the mandate of Article 27.3 (b) of TRIPS, India adopted the PPV&FR Act, 2001
as a sui generis regime protecting not only new plant varieties but also farmers‘ rights.
It is the ancient and indigenous knowledge held by any community or a group of people.
In olden times it was not recorded anywhere and was available only in oral form.
TK is not limited to a particular field. It covers a wide area, such as the use of plants or their
extracts for medical treatments, a traditional form of dance, particular techniques used for
hunting, craft knowledge/skills and so on.
Though there is no official record but some forms of TK find appearance in the culture, stories,
legends, folklore, rituals, songs, etc.
Previously, there was no mechanism available to protect TK, but now, it has been recognized as
IPR under TRIPS Agreement. T
he Government of India has created a digital library termed as Traditional Knowledge Digital
Library (TKDL) as a repository of 2,50,000 formulations of various systems of Indian medicine.
A design is a creation of the human mind, which is appealing to the eyes and attracts the
attention of the viewers.
The need to protect Industrial Designs (ID) was recognized in the 18th century and the Indian
legislation enacted the ‗Patterns and Designs Act‘ in 1872 for the first time.
The Act was enacted to protect the rights over the creation of the designs and novel patterns by
the inventors.
The Act was replaced by the British Patents and Designs Act in 1907, which later became the
basis for the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911.
In 1970, a separate Act was enacted for the patent, i.e. the Patent Act, 1970.
The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, remained in force for designs only. Finally, in the
year 2000, a dedicated Act for the ID was passed, which came into force in 2001.
In 1927 the ‗Indian Forest Act‘ and later on the ‗Wildlife Protection Act, 1972‘ was enacted to
provide legal protection to biodiversity.
In 1988, the ‗National Forest Policy‘ was passed, which brought revolutionary changes in the
conservation and management of biodiversity.
The Acts and policies in force to protect the environment and biodiversity in India include
Mining and Mineral Development Regulation Act, 1957;
Water (prevention and control of pollution) Act, 1974;
Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Biological Diversity Act, 2002;
Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (recognition of rights)
Act, 2006;
National Biodiversity Action Plan, 2009;
National Environment Policy, 2006 and a few more.
In order to fill the gaps existing in the IP Laws and Acts and also to introduce new
guidelines/directions based on the current scenario (socially and politically), each nation keeps
on updating the concerned IP Laws and Acts. Some of the salient amendments made in Indian
Laws and Acts on IPR are mentioned below:
Table 1.1: History of Laws and Acts pertaining to intellectual property in India.
In order to understand the extensive field of IP, it has been divided into various
categories. In India, these categories include Patents, Copyright and Related Rights,
Trademark, Trade Secrets, Industrial Designs, Geographical Indications and
Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Designs. Each of these categories is
described in the following sections.
Patents
A patent is an exclusive right granted for an innovation that generally provides a new way of
doing something or offers a new technical solution to a problem.
The exclusive right legally protects the invention from being copied or reproduced by others.
In return, the invention must be disclosed in an application in a manner sufficiently clear and
complete to enable it to be replicated by a person with an ordinary level of skill in the relevant
field.
Novelty - Not part of ‘State of the Art’. The innovation claimed in the patent application is new
and not known to anybody in the world. In other words, the innovation is
a) not in the knowledge of the public,
b) not published anywhere through any means of publication and
c) not be claimed in any other specification by any other applicant.
Inventive step - Not obvious to the person (s) skilled in the art.
The innovation is a) a technical advancement over the existing knowledge,
b) possesses economic significance and,
c) not obvious to a person skilled in the concerned subject.
Once an invention has been developed, the inventor has to decide whether to exploit the
invention for personal benefits as provided by the statutory laws of the country or put it in
the public domain. By and large, the inventor prefers the former option.
Only a miniscule of inventions are placed in the public domain without claiming any
benefits.
In the latter case, anybody can exploit the innovation for commercial or societal benefit
without paying any money to the inventor.
If the owner of an invention wishes to seek monetary gains, he can choose from either of
the two options, i.e. patenting or Trade Secret.
If the inventor is absolutely sure of maintaining the secrecy of invention for a very long
period (maybe 100 years or more) and the probability of reverse engineering of the
technology is nil or very low, then the ‗Trade Secret‘ category is preferred.
If the invention has a short life span or can be kept secret only for a small period of time
(a couple of years or so) or the probability of reverse engineering is high once the
invention is in the public domain, then the ‗patent‘ category is preferred.
As per the Court of Law, a patent owner has the right to decide who may or may not use
the patented invention.
In other words, the patent protection provided by the law states that the invention cannot
be commercially made, used, distributed, imported, or sold by others without the patent
owner's consent.
The patent owner may permit other parties to use the invention on mutually agreed terms.
As a matter of fact, the patent rights are negative rights as the owner is restricting others
from using the patent in any manner without his prior permission.
The patent holder may choose to sue the infringing party to stop illegal use of the patent
and also ask for compensation for the unauthorized use.
Patents may be granted for inventions/technologies in any field, ranging from a paper clip
or ballpoint pen to a nanotechnology chip or a Harvard mouse (mouse with cancer
genes).
It is a general belief that patents are awarded only to major scientific breakthroughs. But,
it is not true. In fact, the majority of patents are granted to inventions displaying an
improvement over the existing invention.
For example, many patents can be awarded to a single molecule e.g. penicillins (an
antibiotic that kills microbes) and its derivatives.
The derivatives are made by making subtle changes in the structure of the penicillin
resulting in new/improved properties, such as acid stability or temperature stability or
killing a wide range of microbes (germs).
The new antibiotic molecules, known as second, third or fourth generation penicillins can
also be patented.
In our daily life, we use many patented items, such as toothbrush, toothpaste, shoes, pen,
eyeglasses, textiles, mobile phones, wrist watch, bicycle, scooter, car, television, cold
drinks, beverages and many more.
It is not uncommon that many products contain several inventions (patents) e.g. the
laptop computer involves hundreds of inventions working together. Similarly, cars,
mobile phones and televisions have many patented components.
In the ‗Patent Act, 1970, there are some exclusions (product and processes) that cannot be
patented, such as:
Invention contrary to public morality - a method for human cloning, a method for gambling.
Mere discovery - finding a new micro-organism occurring freely in nature, laws of gravity.
Mere discovery of a new form of a known substance - use of aspirin for heart treatment.
Aspirin was patented for reducing fever and mild pains.
Frivolous invention - dough supplemented with herbs, merely changing the taste of the dough,
100 years calendar, bus timetable.
Inventions falling within Section 20(1) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - inventions relating
to compounds of Uranium, Beryllium, Thorium, Plutonium, Radium, Graphite, Lithium and
more as notified by the Central Government from time to time.
Literary, dramatic, musical, artistic work - books, sculptures, drawings, paintings, computer
programmes, mathematical calculations, online chatting method, method of teaching,
method of learning a language as they are the subject matter of Copyright Act. 1957.
Plants and animals - plants and animals in whole or any part including seeds, varieties and
species and essentially biological processes for the production or propagation of plants and
animals are excluded from the scope of protection under patents.
Once the patent is granted to the applicant, he owns the right to use or exploit the invention in
any capacity. If anyone uses the invention without the prior permission of the owner, that act will
be considered an infringement of the invention. Infringements can be classified into two
categories:
Direct Infringement - when a product is substantially close to any patented product or in a case
where the marketing or commercial use of the invention is carried out without the permission of
the owner of the invention.
It is pertinent to mention that the Central government always holds the rights (Section 100 of the
Patent Act, 1970, Rule 32 of the Patent Rules, 2003) to use the invention in the case of national
emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency after notifying the owner.
Generally, an invention that has been either published or publicly displayed cannot be
patented, as the claimed invention will lose the ‗Novelty‘ criterion.
However, under certain circumstances,the Patents Act provides a grace period of 12
months for filing a patent application from the date of its publication in a journal or
presentation in a reputed scientific society or exhibition.
Sometimes, disclosure of an invention before filing a patent application is unavoidable,
e.g. selling your invention to a potential investor or a business partner who would like to
know complete details of the invention in order to judge its commercial value.
In such a case, it is advisable to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) or any other
confidential agreement to safeguards your interest.
In India, the process of grant of a patent is a lengthy procedure that may take anywhere 3-4 years
or more. The major steps involved in this process are listed in figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Flow chart of major steps involved in the grant of a patent.
Patents’ Databases
Indian Patent Advanced Search System(InPASS- http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/publicsearch/).
Patentscope(WIPO- https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/).
Espacenet(EU- https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/).
USPTO(USA- https://www.uspto.gov/).
Although, majority of NPL data is available freely on the public forum, some of the
journals are paid and can be accessed after paying the subscription.
Major Patent Offices such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO),
European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), etc. are maintaining inhouse
NPL databases to make patents examination more effective.
2.1.9.2. Choice of Application to be Filed - Once a decision has been made to patent the
invention, the next step is, what kind of application needs to be filed i.e. provisional patent
application or complete (Final) patent application - generally, the provisional patent application
is preferred for the following reasons:
In other words, the provisional application does not require complete specifications of the
inventions.
The application can be filed even though some data is yet to be collected from pending
experiments.
A provisional application allows you to secure a priority date for the patent applied.
However, it is mandatory to file the complete patent application within one year of the filing of
the provisional application; otherwise, the application stands rejected.
2.1.9.3. Patent Application Forms - As per the Patent Act, 1970 (Section 39) and the Patents
Rules, 2003 (Rule 7, 54, 135 and subrule (1) of rule 20, the application for the grant of patent is
filed using Form-1 (Fig. 2.2) and Form-2 (Fig. 2.3).
The ‗Claims‘ of the patent are a very crucial part of the specifications because they define the
actual boundary of the invention.
‗Claims‘ specify what is actually claimed by the invention and what is being sought to be
protected.
It clearly describes what the patent does and does not cover. The Claims are usually expressed as
a declaration of technical particulars articulated in legal terms.
Below mentioned are two important forms Form-1 and Form-2 for filing the patent application
(http://www.ip india.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPORule/1_10_1_patents-amend ments-rules-
2005.pdf).
In the case of joint applications, all the applicants are bestowed with equal rights and
consideration.
2.1.9.5. Publication –
Once the patent application has been filed at the Regional Patent Office, the patent
application is kept secret for 18 months in the Patent Office.
After the expiry of 18 months (from the date of filing of the application or the priority
claimed date,whichever is earlier), the application is published in the Official Journal of
Patent Office (http://www.ipindia.nic.in/journalpatents.htm).
The purpose of publishing the application is to inform the public about the invention. The
publication of an application is a mandatory step.
2.1.9.7 Examination –
a) The applicant for the patent wrongfully obtained the invention or any part of the
invention.
b) The invention claimed has been published before the priority date.
c) The invention claimed was publicly known/used before the priority date.
d) The invention claimed is obvious and does not involve an inventive step.
e) The subject of the claim is not patentable as per Chapter II of the Patent Act, 1970.
f) The details/specifications of the invention do not sufficiently and clearly describe the
invention.
a) The patent owner has a decent job e.g. university professor and has no desire or aptitude
to exploit the patent on his own.
b) The patent owner may not have the necessary manufacturing facilities.
c) The manufacturing facility is not able to meet the market demand.
d) The patent owner wishes to concentrate on one geographic market; for other geographical
markets, he may choose to license the patent rights.
Once the patent is granted, the patentee (person holding the rights to the patent) enjoys
the exclusive rights to use the patented invention.
Only the patentee has the right to licence or deal with the patent for any deliberations.
Although, the validity of the granted patent is for 20 years (from the date of filing a
patent application), but the patentee is required to furnish information (Form-27), on an
annual basis relating to the commercialization/selling of the patent. It is called as
‗Working/Licensing of the Patent‘.
In an Exclusive Licence, the patent is sold to only one individual/organization for a fixed time
period. During this time period, no other person or entity can exploit the relevant IP except the
named licensee.
In Non-Exclusive Licence, a patentee can sell his patent rights to as many individuals/parties as
he likes. If the patentee is not able to commercialize his patent within three years from the date
Reasonable requirements of the public concerning the patented invention have not been
satisfied.
The patented invention is not available to the public at a reasonable price.
The patented invention is not worked in the territory of India.
However, given the complexity of patent documents, it is advisable to seek legal assistance from
a patent attorney/agent when drafting a patent application.
Furthermore, the legislation of many countries requires that an applicant, whose ordinary
residence or principal place of business is outside the country, be represented by an attorney or
agent qualified in the country (which usually means an agent or attorney who resides and
practices in that country).
There is no such term as ‗Universal Patent‘ or ‗World Patent‘ or ‗International Patent‘ as the
patent rights are territorial.
An application for a patent must be filed with a Patent Office of the country in which one wishes
to seek patent protection.
Unfortunately, this option becomes laborious, cumbersome, timeconsuming and expensive if one
wishes to file a patent application in many countries.
To ease out this issue, many Regional Offices have been established which receive patent
applications on behalf of a group of nations e.g. European Patent Office and African Regional
Intellectual Property Organization.
A single application is sufficient to cover many nations that are members of a particular regional
office/organization. However, if one wishes to seek patent protection in several countries
worldwide, it is preferred to file an international patent under the Patent Cooperation Treaty
(PCT).
The only condition is that the applicant‘s country should be a member of PCT. India, along with
over 190 nations, is a member of PCT.
But for this, prior approval is needed from the Patent Office. However, this approval can be
waived off under the following circumstances:
The applicant is not an Indian resident.
If 6 weeks have expired since the patent application was filed in India by an Indian resident.
If two or more inventors are working on an invention in a foreign country and one of the
inventors is an Indian resident.
The invention does not have a potential market in India and hence does not wish to file the patent
in India. In such a scenario, the Indian resident has to seek Foreign Filing Permission (FFP) from
an Indian Patent Office.
In case of international collaboration, if one part of the invention originated in India and the
inventor is an Indian resident, he has to seek permission to file the patent outside India.
If the invention is related to defense or atomic energy or utility model, the inventor/s needs to
seek permission from the Indian Patent Office because inventions related to these domains are
not the subject matter of patentability in India.
Ordinary Application - A patent application filed with complete specifications and claims
but without claiming any priority date.
PCT Application - An international application filed in accordance with PCT. A single
application can be filed to seek patent protection and claim priority in all the member countries
of PCT.
Divisional Application - When an application claims more than one invention, the applicant
on his own or to meet the official objection on the ground of plurality may divide the application
and file two or more applications.
This application divided out of the parent one is known as a Divisional Application. The priority
date for all the divisional applications will be the same as that of the main (the Parent)
Application (Ante-dating).
Benefit - There is no need to pay a separate renewal fee for the ‗Patent of Addition‘, during the
term of the main patent. It expires along with the main patent.
Convention Application - If a patent application has been filed in the Indian Patent Office,
and the applicant wishes to file the same invention in the one or more Convention countries (e.g.
Paris Convention) by claiming the same priority date on which application was filed in India,
such an application is known as Convention Application.
The applicant has to file Convention Application within 12 months from the date of filing in
India to claim the same priority date
In many cases, a new invention involves an incremental improvement over the existing products,
but this technical improvement is not sufficient enough to pass the stringent criterion of
‗Novelty‘ and ‗Non-obviousness‘ set aside for the grant of a patent.
Such small innovations can still be legally protected in some countries and termed as ‘Utility
Models’ or ‘Petty Patents’ or ‘Innovation Patents’.
In this case, the criterion of ‗Novelty‘ and ‗Non-obviousness‘ are diluted or relinquished. But
the requirement of industrial application or utility is the same as that for patents.
Utility Model is a helpful tool for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) since the grant
of a ‗Utility Model‘ is usually less rigorous and involves minimal cost.
MSMEs do not have deep pockets to carry out intensive R&D leading to the grant of patents.
But their innovations are good enough for improving their products/processes and bringing more
financial rewards.
Such inventions pass the requirements set aside for Utility Models but not for patents.
The life of the Utility Model is less as compared to the patents. It varies from 7-15 years in
different countries.
Nearly 80 countries, including France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, China, Finland, Russian
Federation and Spain, provide protection for Utility Models under their IPR laws.
India till date does not recognize utility patents. If these small patents are recognised under IP
protection in India, it will catapult the number of patents (filed and granted) on annual basis.
The patent system in India is governed by the Patents Act, 1970 (No.39 of 1970) as amended
by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 and the Patents Rules, 2003.
The Patent Rules are regularly amended in accordance with the changing environment, the most
recent being in 2020.
Maximum number of patents (9700) have been granted to a Japanese Shunpei Yamazaki in
a span of 49 years (1972- December, 2020) at the rate of 196 patents per year.
Maximum number of Patents (1299) granted to a person of Indian origin is Gurtej Sandhu
in a span of 30 years (1991- December, 2020) at the rate of 43 patents per year.
Patent Status (India): The number of patent applications filed in India is considerably low vis a
vis many countries.
However, during 10 years period (2010-20) an increase of nearly 30% and 86% was observed in
the number of patent applications filed and examined respectively (Fig. 2.5).
In case of patents granted, data of first three years (2010-13) showed a dip in the numbers
followed by a significant rise (nearly six folds) in the ensuing years (2013-20).
It could be attributed to the increase in the number of patent applications processed as the
government hired more patent examiners.
The number of patent examined rose to 80,088 in 2019- 20 as compared to 11,208 in 2010-11.