Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 1/20

Date: ________
Student Name: _________________________ TA Name: ___________
Personal Number: - TA Signature: _______________
Notes:

_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
(The mixer tutorial and assignment at the end of tutorial is optional)
LAB-2 (Tutorial)
Gilbert Mixer Simulation
(Cadence SpectreRF)
Prepared By
Rashad.M.Ramzan
rashad@isy.liu.se

Receiver Front-end
LO

RF Image
LNA
Filter Filter
Mixer
50Ω

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 2/20
Introduction:
This Tutorial LAB describes how to use SpectreRF in Analog Design Environment to
simulate the parameters which are important in design verification of a mixer. To
characterize a mixer, the following figure of merits are usually simulated and measured.

1. Power Consumption
2. RF to IF Conversion Gain
3. Noise and NF
4. Input and Output Impedance Matching
5. LO to RF and LO to IF Isolation
6. Linearity

The analyses listed below are used to characterize the mixer for the above mentioned
parameters:

1. Conversion Gain
• Voltage Conversion Gain Versus LO Signal Power (Swept PSS with PAC)
• Voltage Conversion Gain Versus RF Frequency (PSS and Swept PAC)
• Voltage Conversion Gain Versus RF Frequency (PSS and Swept PXF)
• Power Conversion Gain Versus RF Frequency (QPSS)
2. Port-to-Port Isolation Among RF, IF and LO Ports (PSS and Swept PAC)
3. Power Dissipation (QPSS)
4. S-Parameters (PSS and PSP)
5. Total Noise and NF, SSB and DSB Noise Figures (PSS and Pnoise)
6. Intermodulation Distortion and Intercept Points (PSS and Swept PSS)
7. Mixer Performance with a Blocking Signal (QPSS, QPAC, and QPnoise)
Instructions
• You can complete this tutorial in your own time, if there is any problem please send
an email or show up in the office of the TA. You must answer the questions in the
LAB compendium before you start the tutorial, this will help you to comprehend
the tutorial material and simulations.
Cadence Setup and Guidelines

Please read the “Cadence Setup and Guidelines” section LNA Tutorial.

1. Background Preparation
Please answer the following questions before the LAB. For answers look at the lecture
notes and text books for this course.
• List the major categories (Active/Passive, single/double balanced) of the mixers, one
advantage and disadvantage of each type?

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 3/20

• How can we relate the blocker strength (both in case of in band and out of band
blockers) allowed in certain standard with LO leakage?

• Why can we not use AC and SP analysis for Mixer circuits, why are periodic and quasi
periodic types of analysis mandatory to simulate these circuits?

• Passive mixers have better IP3 but they have conversion loss rather than gain and hence
degraded NF. Gilbert Mixer is double balanced active mixer with differential topology.
Please comment about the isolation, gain, NF and IP3 characteristic of Gilbert Mixer
compared to passive mixers. Why is higher LO strength needed for a Gilbert mixer?

• Define the SSB and DSB Noise Figure of a mixer? In case of Zero-IF architecture
which type of NF should be simulated and measured?

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 4/20
• The RF-LO, RF-IF and LO-IF feedthrough create problem in receiver design. Please
specify one problem for each of them.
RF-LO:

RF-IF:

LO-IF:

• What is meant by the “desensitization” in radio receiver?

• Why are even order distortions “fatal” for ZeroIF receiver designs and are ignorable for
superheterodyne receivers? Is differential LNA and Mixer a remedy to this problem?

2. Gilbert Mixer Simulation

2.1. Simulation Environment Setup
• We will be using AMS 0.35µm CMOS (c35b4) process for these LABs.
• Load the Cadence and technology file using
• module add cadence/5.0.33
• module add ams/3.60
• Start cadence by typing ams_cds –tech c35b4 –mode fb&
• Make a new library new_lab (you can put your own name or as you like) in
Cadence Library Manager
• Create and draw the Schematics, mixer_testbench a as shown in Fig-1 and
mixer as shown in Fig-2. The components values are listed in next section for
your convenience.
• For details of simulation setup please read the Cadence Setup Guidelines
section of LNA Tutorial

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 5/20

Fig 1: Gilbert Mixer Schematic

Fig 2: Test Bench of Gilbert Mixer

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 6/20
2.2. Circuit Simulation Setup
• RF Port in mixer_testbench Schematic

50 Ohms in Resistance

1 in Port Number

Sine or dc in Source Type depending upon the analysis you
choose

Type frf in Frequency name 1 field (choose sine for this)

Type frf in Frequency 1 field

Type prf in Amplitude1 in dBm field

display small signal parameter  check Box

Type pacmag in PAC Magnitude field
• LO Port in mixer_testbench Schematic

50 Ohms in Resistance

2 in Port Number

Sine in Source Type

Type flo in Frequency name 1 field

Type flo in Frequency 1 field

Type plo in Amplitude1(dBm) field
• IF Port in Schematic mixer_testbench

50 Ohms in Resistance

3 in Port Number

dc in Source Type
• Component Values in Schematic mixer_testbench

Vdd = 3.3V, Coupling Capacitors= 10nF

RF and LO external port matching resistors = 50 Ω

Balun (Single input Impedance= 50 Ω , Balanced output
Impedance= 50 Ω ,Insertion loss = 0db)

All LO port VCVS (Type  linear, Gain=0.5, gain =0.5)

IF port VCVS (Type  linear, Gain=1, gain =1)

V3 and V4  DC Voltage  2.5V
• Component Values in MIXER Schematic

M1, M2, M7, M8, Mbias = 200µm/0.35µm

M3,M4,M5,M6 = 100µm/0.35µm

R0, R1,R2 = 500 Ω and R3,R4 = 3000 Ω
2.3. Voltage Conversion Gain
A mixer’s frequency converting action is characterized by conversion gain (active mixer)
or loss (passive mixer). The voltage conversion gain is the ratio of the RMS voltages of
the IF and RF signals. The power conversion gain is the ratio of the power delivered to
the load and the available RF input power. When the mixer’s input impedance and load
impedance are both equal to the source impedance, the power and voltage conversion
gains, in decibels, are the same. Note that when you load a mixer with a high impedance
filter, this condition is not satisfied. You can calculate the voltage conversion gain in two
ways:

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 7/20
• Using a small signal analysis, like PSS with PAC or PXF. The PSS with PAC or PXF
analyses supply the small-signal gain information. A second method is to use a two-
tone large-signal QPSS analysis which is more time-consuming.
• The power conversion gain also requires two-tone large-signal QPSS analysis.
a) Voltage Conversion Gain versus the LO Signal Power (swept PSS with PAC)
• RF Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  DC
• LO Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  sine (flo,flo,plo)
• IF Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  DC
• Verify the Design variables values in the affirma window are

frf = 2.4 GHz, flo = 2.4 GHz

prf = -50 and plo = 10 both in dbm field

pacmag = 1 , not in dbm range
• In the affirma window, select Analysis Choose
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis

Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  flo flo 2.4GHz (press update from
schematic button) , look like
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2

Beat Frequency  2.4G, Output Harmonics  10

Accuracy Default  Moderate, Sweep  variable (plo)

Sweep Range  -10 to 20, Sweep Type  Linear

No of steps  10 , Enable and apply
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select PAC for Analysis

Frequency Sweep Range  2.4GHz

Sideband  Max Sideband 2

Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) PSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  PAC

Function  Voltage, Select  net

Sweep  Variable, Signal Level  Peak

Modifier  dB20, Output Harmonics  -1

Select mixout node in schematics

You will see the plot as shown in Fig-3.
Note-1: The PAC analysis calculates the gain directly when the pacmag parameter is 1V. If
this is not the case take the ratio of input and output.
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden
Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 8/20

Fig 3: Voltage Conversion Gain versus the LO Signal Power

Note-2: The plo for maximum gain is 5dBm in this case. We will use this value in the
subsequent simulations.
b) Voltage Conversion Gain versus RF Frequency (PSS with swept PAC)
• Test Bench Parameters same as part a)
• In Design variables

Change plo = 5
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select PAC for Analysis

Frequency Sweep Range  2.4GHz to 2.41GHz

Sideband  Max Sideband 2

Enable and apply
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis

Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  flo flo 2.4GHz (press update from
schematic button) , look like
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2

Beat Frequency  2.4G, Output Harmonics  10

Accuracy Default  Moderate

Switch off the sweep option

Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) PSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  PAC

Function  Voltage, Select  net

Sweep  Sideband, Signal Level  Peak, Modifier  dB20

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 9/20

Output Harmonics -1 0 -10M

Select mixout node in schematics

You will see the plot as shown in Fig-4.

Fig 4: Voltage Conversion Gain versus RF frequency using PAC and PXF
c) Voltage Conversion Gain versus RF Frequency (PSS with swept PXF)
• Test Bench Parameters same as part a)
• In Design variables

Change plo = 5
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis

Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  (press update from schematic button) , it
should look like
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2

Beat Frequency  2.4G

Output Harmonics  10, Accuracy Default  Moderate

Sweep option off, Enable and apply
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select PXF for Analysis

Frequency Range  1KHz to 10MHz

Sideband  Max Sideband 2

Sweep Type  automatic, Output  voltage

Positive output node  mixout (from schematic)

Negative output node  gnd (from schematic)

Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 10/20
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) PSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  PXF

Function  Voltage, Sweep  Sideband, Modifier  dB20

Output Harmonics 1 1K -10M

Select RF port in schematics

You will see the plot as shown in Fig-4 above.
2.4. Port-to-Port Isolation among (PSS, Swept PAC and Swept PXF)
The PAC and PXF analysis can be combined to produce the transfer function from
different ports to each other. Here we will simulate the RF-LO, RF-IF and LO-IF feed
through.
RF-LO feed-through affects the LO if a strong blocker is present at the RF input. RF-IF
feed through creates and even order distortion for Zero-IF receivers. LO-IF feedthrough
must be limited to avoid the desensitization problem in the stage following the mixer.
• Test bench is same as voltage conversion gain analysis.
• Make sure plo = 5 in design variables
• RF port type: Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  sine (as in earlier analysis)
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis

Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  (press update from schematic button) , it
looks like
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2
frf frf 2.4G Large PORT1

Beat Frequency  2.4G

Output Harmonics  10, Accuracy Default  Moderate

Switch off the sweep option

Enable and apply
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select PAC for Analysis

Frequency Sweep Range  2.4GHz to 2.41GHz

Sideband  Max Sideband 2, Sweep Type  Automatic

Enable and apply
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select PXF for Analysis

Frequency Range  2.4GHz to 2.43GHz

Sideband  Max Sideband 2, Sweep Type  automatic

Output  voltage,

Positive output node  mixout (from schematic)

Negative output node  gnd (from schematic); Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden
Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 11/20
RF-to-LO Feedthrough:
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) PSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  PAC

Function  Voltage

Select  net

Sweep  Sideband

Signal Level  Peak

Modifier  dB20

Output Harmonics -1 0 to 10M (This represents the down
converted RF signal at LO port)

Select LO port, see the results in the Fig-5
RF-to-IF Feedthrough:
• Now just change.

Output Harmonics 0 2.4G -2.41G (This represents the RF
signal to IF port without down conversion)

Select IF port, see the results in the Fig-5

Fig 5: RF-to-LO & IF Feedthrough

LO-to-IF Feedthrough:
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) PSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  PXF

Function  Voltage, Sweep  Sideband, Modifier  dB20

Output Sideband  0 2.4G -2.43G

Select LO port in schematics , see the results in the Fig-6
LO-to-RF Feedthrough:

Now Select RF port instead of LO port in schematics (Fig-6)

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 12/20

Fig 6: LO-to-IF Feedthrough

2.5. Power Dissipation, Large Signal Power (Voltage) Conversion Gain (QPSS)
QPSS (Quasi Periodic Steady State Analysis) is an analysis that invokes a series of PSS
like analyses over all the input frequencies, their harmonics and the inter-modulation of the
frequencies and harmonics.
QPSS allows arbitrary signal inputs, including sum of sinusoids which are not periodic, so
called quasi periodic extension of PSS. Similar to PAC (Periodic AC analysis) it calculates
the responses of the circuits that exhibit the frequency translation like mixer, oscillator etc.
Unlike PAC, PSS is not explicitly required before QPSS as it simulates the moderate and
large signal behavior instead of small signal behavior.

• Disable all other analysis

• RF Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  sine (frf,frf,prf)
• LO Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  sine (flo,flo,plo)
• IF Port Parameters in the Schematic

Resistance  50 Ω, Source Type  DC
• Verify that the Design variables values in the affirma window are

frf = 2.41 GHz, prf = -30 , flo = 2.4GHz, plo = 5 , pacmag = 1
• In the affirma window, select Analysis Choose
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select QPSS for Analysis

Click update from schematic

You should see the lines below (change the harmonics manually
to 5 and 3. your port numbers may be different)
flo flo 2.4G large potr2 5
frf frf 2.41 moderate port1 3

Accuracy  moderate

Enable and apply

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 13/20
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) QPSS
• The QPSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  qpss, Function  power

Select  instance with two terminal, Modifier  dB10

Select VDD source terminal in schematics

You will see the plot as shown in Fig7
Note: QPSS and PSS provide the spectrum not a scalar values. Summation of harmonics
and sidebands gives a good estimate of the total power consumption. Most of the power is
in the main output harmonics.

Fig 7: Large Signal Voltage Conversion Gain

2.6. S-Parameters (PSS and PSP)
QPSS (Quasi Periodic Steady State Analysis) is an analysis that invokes a series of PSS
like analysis over all the input frequencies, their harmonics and the inter-modulation of the
frequencies and harmonics.
• In Design variables

Change RF port  dc
• Verify the variable values in the affirma window

flo = 2.4 GHz (frf, prf, pcmag are meaningless in this analysis)

plo= 5
• Disable previous QPSS analysis; Now at the top of choosing Analysis window
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis, Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  (press update from schematic button)
flo flo 2.4GHz Large PORT2

Beat Frequency  2.4G, Output Harmonics  10

Accuracy Default  Moderate, Enable and apply
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSP for Analysis
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden
Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 14/20

Sweep type  absolute (If you choose relative , you can see
results on scale of 2.4Ghz and onward)

Start-stop  1K -- 10M, Sweep Type  Automatic

Press Select port button and point to the RF, IF and LO ports in
schematic, and enter the desired data
1 PORT0 1 2.4G - 2.41G
2 PORT3 0 2.4G - 2.41G
3 PORT1 1 2.4G - 2.41G

Order of ports is important, in our case Port0 (RF) is numbered
1 and port 3 (IF) is numbered 2. These are considered as input
and out ports for noise analysis respectively.

Do Noise  Yes, Maximum sidebands  10, Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
• In the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form) QPSS
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  psp, Function  SP or NF or NFdsb

Plot Type Rectangular, Modifier  db20

You will see the plot as shown in Fig8 and Fig9

Fig 8: NF and S-Parameter Plots

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 15/20
Fig 9: S-Parameters Isolation Plots
2.7. Noise Figure (PSS and Pnoise)
Typically, the signal present at the image frequency is not desired. The mixer translates
both the RF and the image signals to the same IF. So for a noiseless mixer the output SNR
is half the input SNR ie. NFSSB of a noiseless mixer is 3 dB.

However, in some applications (direct conversion receivers) the signal present at the image
frequency contains useful information, and hence the NFDSB is measured and calculated.

• In schematic

RF port  dc (prf, frf , pcmag are meaning less)

LO port  sine (flo,flo,plo)
• Verify the variable values in the affirma window

flo = 2.4 GHz , plo= 5
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select PSS for Analysis

Uncheck the Auto Calculate Box

Set fundamental tone  flo flo 2.4GHz (press update from
schematic button)

Beat Frequency  2.4G

Output Harmonics  10

Accuracy Default  Moderate

Sweep  variable

Variable name plo

Sweep Range  -10dBm to 20dBm

Sweep Type  Linear

No of steps  10 , Enable and apply
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select Pnoise for Analysis

Sweep type  absolute

Start-stop  10M (noise is calculated at this frequency, the1/f
noise effect will not present, to see that make this frequency 10K
or 1K)

Maximum side band 10

Output voltage select mixout and gnd

Input source  port  select RF port

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 16/20

Reference sideband  -1

Noise Type  sources, , Enable and apply
• In the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start the
simulation, make sure that simulation completes without errors.
• Now in the affirma window click on the Results Direct plot (main form)
Pnoise
• The PSS results window appears.

Analysis Type  Pnoise

Function  NF or NFdsb or Output Noise

You will see the plot as shown in Fig10
Note: If you select output as probe instead of voltage and point to IF port, you can
get all types of NFs, noise correlation matrices and equivalent noise parameters.

Fig 10: Noise Figure SSB , DSB and Output Noise

2.8. 1dB Compression and IIP3 (QPSS & QPAC)
In small signal conditions the output power increases linearly with increase in the input
signal power, When circuits shift toward large signal operation this relation is no longer
linear. The 1dB compression point is a measure of this nonlinearity. This is power where
the output of the fundamental crosses the line that represents the output power extrapolated
from small signal conditions minus 1dB.
The recommended approach to calculate the 1dB CP and IIP3 is to apply large LO and one
medium RF tone and perform the QPSS analysis. Then you apply the second tone as a
small tone close to the RF signal frequency and perform the QPAC. The power of the 2nd
small signal RF tone has to small enough that IM1 and IM3 are in there asymptotic ranges.
• Change/Check the LO Port Parameters in Schematic Window

LO port  sine (flo,flo,plo)

IF port  DC and 50 Ohms
• Change the RF Port Parameters in Schematic Window

Sine in Source Type

frf in Frequency name 1 field

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 17/20

frf in Frequency 1 field

prf in Amplitude1(dBm) field

Click on the Box Display Signal Parameters

pacmagdb in PAC Magnitude field (dB field)
• Verify the variable values in the affirma window

flo = 2.4 GHz, frf =2.401 GHz, prf = -10 ,plo= 5, pacmagdb=prf
• In the affirma window, select Analysis Choose
• Disable previous analysis; The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select qpss for Analysis

In Fundamental Tones, the following lines should be visible (if
its different please change them)
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2 5
frf frf 2.401G modrate PORT1 4

Accuracy Default  Moderate

High light the Sweep Button

Select Design Variable, small window appears, choose prf in it

Sweep Range  Choose the start : -70dBm and Stop: 10dBm

Sweep Type  Linear and No of Steps =15

Enable Box in the bottom should be checked.
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select QPAC for Analysis

Sweep Type  absolute, Freq  2.4011GHz

Max Clock Order  2, Enable and apply
• Click OK in the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start
the simulation.
• In the affirma window, select Results Direct plot (main form) Main Form

Analysis  QPSS

Select Function  Compression Point

Gain Compression  1dB

Extrapolation Point  -70dB

1st Order Harmonic  -1 1 (1M)

Select Port (Fixed R (Port)) click IF PORT

The resulting plot is shown in Fig11
• In the affirma window, select Results Direct plot (main form) Main Form

Analysis  QPAC , Function  IPN Curves

Select Port (Fixed R (Port))

Highlight variable Sweep Prf

Extrapolation Point  -60dB

Highlight Input Referred IP3, Order  3rd

3rd Order Harmonic  1 -2 (900K)

1st Order Harmonic  -1 0 (1.1M)

Activate the Schematic Window and click on IF port to view the
results as shown in Fig12

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 18/20

Fig 11: 1db Compression point and IIP3

Fig 12: IIP3 using QPSS and QPAC

2.9. Effect of the Blocker on Gain and NF of Mixer (QPSS, QPAC and QPnoise)
In band and out of band blockers are specified for all standards (GSM, DECT etc) as
discussed in class lectures. These blocker desensitize the receiver i.e. the gain and NF of
the receiver for desired signal is drastically degraded. All communication standards
include the blocking requirement for both mobile terminals and base stations. The
requirement defines several in-band and out-of-band blockers.
• Change/Check the LO Port Parameters in Schematic Window

LO port  sine (flo,flo,plo)

IF port  DC and 50 Ohms

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden

Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 19/20
• Change the RF Port Parameters in Schematic Window

Sine in Source Type

frf in Frequency name 1 field

frf in Frequency 1 field

prf in Amplitude1(dBm) field

Click on the Box Display Signal Parameters

pacmagdb in PAC Magnitude field
• Verify the variable values in the affirma window

flo = 2.4 GHz, frf = 2.403 GHz

prf = -50 ,plo= 5, pacmagdb =-30db
• In the affirma window, select Analysis Choose
• The Choose Analysis window shows up

Select qpss for Analysis

In Fundamental Tones, the following lines should be visible (if
its different please change them)
flo flo 2.4G Large PORT2 5
frf frf 2.403G modrate PORT1 4

Accuracy Default  Moderate

High light the Sweep Button

Select Design Variable, small window appears, choose prf in it

Sweep Range  Choose the start : -50dBm and Stop: 10dBm

Sweep Type  Liner and No of Steps =15

Enable Box in the bottom should be checked.
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select QPAC for Analysis

Sweep Type  absolute

Freq  2.401GHz

Max Clock Order  2

Enable and apply
• Now at the top of choosing Analysis window

Select QPNoise for Analysis

Sweep Type  absolute, Freq  1M

Max Clock Order  10

Output Probe  select PORT3 (IF-Port)

Input Probe  select PORT1 (RF-Port)

Select Refrence Side Band  (1 0), Enable and apply
• Click OK in the affirma window click on Simulation Netlist and Run to start
the simulation.
• In the affirma window, select Results Direct plot (main form) Main Form

Analysis  QPAC , Function  voltage

Select instance with two terminals

Sweep  variable, Modifier  dB20

Output Harmonic  1M (-1 0)
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden
Spring 2008: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (TSEK-03) 20/20

Click in Schematic on IF port

View the results as shown in Fig14
• In the affirma window, select Results Direct plot (main form) Main Form

Analysis  QPNoise , Function  Noise Figure

View the results as shown in Fig13

Fig 13: Voltage Conversion Gain & NF in presence of Blocking Signal

. .
Assignment: Modified Gilbert Mixer with Improved
Performance
Improve the NF, Gain by 2dB and IP3 by 3dB. To achieve this goal you can use the
same circuit used in this tutorial and burn more power. Alternately to save the power you
can apply any of the advance technique for gain and linearity enhancement discussed in the
class lecture.
Please, report your result in a form of the table as shown below. Please, describe very
briefly how you modified the circuit to meet the specifications and problems encountered
during simulations.

Parameter Present Design Your Design

Gain
NF
1dB Comp Point
IIP3
…..

Electrical Engineering Department (ISY) Linköping University, Sweden