213 224
213 224
213 224
PEM
1
!
3
%& ' (# $ ) * + 2
" # $
4
+ # $ )
, -
6 $ 7) 5 3*42 $) ! %0 ! 0 $) 1 2 ./ )
8- 9 ?< *( = > : 0 < - < ;- ) :%(60-40) 8 2 9
Proton Exchange (PEM) A 6 6 6B @ 8-
6$- > @ AE > ' ' . C A&B ') ; * :Membrane
+ 6 6 ') 6 ) ; * :MATLAB H G ' $ F* -
.
Cathode : O 2 + 4 H + + 4e 2H 2 O
215
! PEM
D& & O + 7c > " & -& = ! 3& ' / R& (1bar & 343 K) -=B
- & + E O+ & (Lact) >! / ' B ?+@2 7 :; / #$ 1
.#>!; " 6! <>; ! K ! $ K" & ' -! 0 $ K" !
; E ' a! ! ! #$ # K - & 7 ; ! ! #$ 1 KT / & -E! 0 ! D& &
&' ( E 3 D& & 7 ; (LOhm) -E # 6 & -E 6 '( "! 0 1 '
D -e 0 E / !" 0 #$ / 0 6 S ' -! 0 ' " 0 ( ;
. ! ! C 5 -; ! 75B>; " ; ( D& & O +
/ $ K" ' % (LCon) ! ! #$ % K - & -E + #$ 1 C>! ! 3 !
' >! / M 9 ' D& & O + 7 ' ! + . > ' 9E ; 1 D9
/' B " ]& " 7[) " " & D - 6( 4!! ; 3 #E E 6
# 7 B>; ! $ K" ' # 0 - & >! " # ! 6S ' -! 0 ! ! !
.5 B K" & = ' ; & B 2 !
1.6
0.8
E-Lact
! ! 9E ' -! 0 $ K" ]& 6
. ; ! ! $ K" & ;
0.6 E-Lact.-Lohm
E-Lact.-Lohm.-Lcon.
0.4
0.2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2 600
current Density(mA/Cm2)
. - O- P A C E (3) ) 1.5
Power Density(mW/Cm 2)
H C E 8- !
(mW/Cm2)
:3-5
Voltage(V)
1 300
: E ) 0.5
Cell Voltage(V)
: = ! !
Current Density(mA/Cm2)
)M E ) ) (2) )
# $ 1- - B 6 .
# $1 - -=B 1 " ; 1 polarization ) - - H C E 8 :2-5
K .(1 bar & 343 K) 1 :(Curve
1 ! - - & ]& (0.5bar & 25 C) ' o
(E) ; !> 1 ! ! ( 3) " ]&
:; #$ -=B 1 1 '. ; 7 = ! ' ; #$ ! ! - &
' -! 0 C 5 - D !! & ' a! - & + 5E& R 2 ( "
( "! ( D $ 1 A ( .1 ! (LOhm # 0 ) (Lact >! ) K:K / & -E! 0
3 = &!& D& !! 0 6! 3 = ; ! ! ( " ]& " 7(LCon " ! )
218
. . .
1.6
0.8
0.2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
. - A&B (5) )
E>FG HIJ;<= HIK LMIN=> BCD ?@A8 9:;<=>:5L5 10% E& < >; D& +
:FOPO=> QIRS . # 0
6 ' hB ' 5E& UB " 2 600
:; & + ( ! & ) 62
Voltage(V)
1 300
9 ; 1 &' !" F 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
Current Density(mA/Cm2)
219
! PEM
DC bus current
m DC bus current Scope2
600
Clock
i
DC bus current
+
In1 Out1 Pfuel
Pf uel + + FC + -
500
+v
lo a d 1
lo a d 2
C o n n 1 4 lo a d 3
lo a d 4
lo a d 5
- - FC - - DC bus v oltage y
Input Control
Subsystem To Workspace
100Vdc Boost
P o w e r D e n s ity (m W )
Fuel Cell Stack
C onn1
C onn2
C onn3
400
C on8
DC/DC Converter
(average value)
1.25 bar
f low rate Current 1 bar
Scope 300 0.8 bar
Continuous Flow rate regulator
0.6 bar
pow ergui
0.4 bar
A > > PEM @ 1* (7) ) R 200
. Simulik/Matlab 0 $- A F 100
A @ :1L6L5 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
: S )
Current Density(mA/Cm2)
! E 8- (6) )
Performance of Fuel Cells System on
. -
constant Fuel flow rate and pressure
-=B / &K! 6 ' ! + #$ Simulik/Matlab 0 ' :6-5
20 12
L ite r
0 10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time Time
Fuel supply Pressure(bar) Fuel supply Pressure(bar)
4 4
bar
2 2
bar
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time Time
Efficiency Efficiency%
50 50
100%
100%
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time Time
Load Current Load Current
20 20
A m p e r(A )
A m p e r(A )
10
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0
Time
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
A @ A (9) )
Time
@ A (8) )
.! S )
.A S )
6 6 6 @ :3L6L5
A @ :2L6L5
: S )
: $ ') S )
Performance of Fuel Cells System on
constant Fuel flow rate and variable Performance of Fuel Cells System on
pressure constant pressure and variable Fuel flow
rate
" / &K! 6 ' ! + #$
" 7(1.5 bar) -=B / &K! ! + #$
12.2 # 0 E ) S 6 2 ;
=!! (Liter/min.) S 62 ;
0.0 – 1.5 ) B -=B =! 7(Liter/min.
/ ! " ?+@2 !D
(10) " ]& "7 ! C 5 - (bar
S # 0 -=B ' 9 !$
7 ; B# ! " & !
& #$ ( 9) " &] " 7/& K " &
1 & (# -! S " ! 1 '
)9 6 ! !& O + & 75 "
=& !C & ! / M -=B
! ' " 7D - 8 ! #$ "
"$ 7 S B$( 6 ' 9
*$ 0 E 6! )9 !
' %50 U L! (10) " ]&
)9 U L! <>;
! ( B Z" !
. S c 3 ( 6' i S # 0
3 ( B$( #- + S # 0 ! 6!
' ( 4 5) 1 E> # $ "+ " O+ . S
1 ! ' -! 0 <>; ! -=B < >;
' -! C D ! :; S
! ( ! /0 ' & -
. # 0
221
! PEM
12
li te r
+" 7 :; #$ ] \ #$ -=B KL! 10
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time
12 14 16 18 20
bar
$ &% & ! #$ / (
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time
Efficiency
100
. :; O #$
100%
50
0
Appendix 1 0 2 4 6 8 10
Time
Load Current
12 14 16 18 20
20
A m p e r(A )
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time
@ A (10) )
. S )
: -6
PEM > ! Table[1] & :; '(& < ' 9!; & !
.[12] E )
> 9 B /0 62 5 ! PEM
7/0 + a :; m ;
KL ! UB ! #! 6' 9 !
' -! 0 # $ ' >! / M -=B 1
+ + ! 7 "" ; 3 ( #$ A jK 71 !
6' 9 MATLAB , & ;! & /0
#! / + 7 " K >9 /
3 ( >! U B ( 1 9 #- ! % & #$ / "+
# $ '> #$:! 6 ' :;
[Table.2]from [13] 4+ I @ ?;f! J @ " 7 :; 4 ; ' -! mE2
,& # $ :; S
7 C 3:! # ! Matlab/Simulink
S + " ! 1 6 ' / =! ?/I @ J k(
+ KL ! & #$ &" " & + / (
K ! S 3 ( #$ & F / =!
S 1 E + :; R 2 9 !
6! - B$( $ ! 6' 7 :;
B $( ' :; + C -! !
. :; S B& D& !
222
. . .
MF
[1]-Connea , J.M. " hydrogen Fuel for Surface
Transportation"1996.
[2]- Services Athero,Fuel Cell Handbook "
EG&G Services ,2000.
[3] – Http://Fuel
Cells.Si.edu//alk/alkmain.htm.
G @ A 79 [Table.3]
[4]- Hydrogen Fuel Cell Engines and Related
Technologies: Rev 0, December 2001. .Matlab/Simulink
[5] – Yang ,C. " Introduction to Fuel Cell %feul cell (V, I)
Science and Engineering "Lecture 5 - Fuel %feul cell (V, I)$
Cell Fundamentals. Hydrogen Economy , TTP T=343; %K
289 -2002. R=8.31447;
[6] - Bernardi , D.M. , Alche, J. '' A F=96484;
Mathematical Model of the solid-polymer P=1;
Electrolyte Fuel Cell'' , Electrochemical P1=P; %PH2
Society, Vol.139,N 0.1,Jan.1995. P2=P; %Po2
[7] – R.F. Mann, J.C.Amphlett, ''Development E=1.229-0.0085*(T-
and Application of a Generalized steady-state 298)+T*0.0000431*(log(P1)+0.5*log(P1));
Electrochemical Model for a PEM Fuel cell '' %En=Enernst for open cercut
J. power Sources /2000. D=exp(-498*T.^(-1));
[8] – J.M.Correa, F.A. Farret, '' An Analysis i=0.01:0.01:75;
of the Dynamic Performance of proton J=i*15;
Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells using an Lact=-
Electrochemical Model"/ IEEE Industial 0.9514+T*(0.00354+0.000078*((log(P2/(5.08
Electronics Society, 2001. *(10^6))))*D)-0.000196*log(i)); %Activtion
[9] – D. Xue, Z. Dong ''Optimal Fuel Cell losses
System Design Considering Functional Rint=0.01605-0.000035*T+0.00008*i;
Performance and Production Costs'' J. power Lohm=-i.*Rint; %ohmic losses
Sources/ 1998. B=0.016; %volt
223
! PEM
[10]- R. Roshandel, B. Farhanieh. " The
effects of non-uniform distribution of catalyst
loading on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel
cell performance" ELSEVIER/ September
2007.
[11] R.F. Mann , J.C. Amphlett , M.A.I.
Hooper , H.M. Jensen , B.A. Peppley , and
P.R. Roberge, " Development and application
of a generalized steady – state electrochemical
model for a PEM fuel cell." J. power Sources ,
vol. 86 ,pp. 173 -180 ,2000.
[12] Jeferson M. Correa, student Member ,
IEEE, Felix A.Farret, Luciane N. Canha, and
Marcelo G. Simoes, Senior Member , IEEE. "
An Electrochemical –Based Fuel -cell Model
suitable for Electrical Engineering Autoation
Approach" 2004 IEEE.
[13] Bouziane MAHMAH. Abdelhamid
M'RAOUI. Maïouf BELHAMEL. Hocine
BENMOUSSA " Experimental Study and
Modelling of a Fuel Cell PEMFC Fed
Directly with Hydrogen / Oxygen" June 2006
– Lyon France.
[14] Q. Li W. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Jia, M. Han.
"Nonlinear robust control of proton exchange
membrane fuel cell bystate feedback exact
linearization"Journal of Power Sources
(2009).
[15] Jia, Member.Q. Li, Y. Wang,Y.T.Cham,
"Modeling and Dynamic Characteristic
Simulation of a proton exchange membrane
fuel cell linearization"2009 IEEE.
. / / : 62 % & h !
224