Structuralism and Deconstructionism
Structuralism and Deconstructionism
Structuralism and Deconstructionism
Structuralism
Structuralism is a method used by sociologists, anthropologists, literary theorists,
and linguists.
They employ it to show how all aspects of culture are based upon some underlying
structure. These structures are formed by interrelations. Therefore, Structuralism is
an intellectual literary movement which was commenced in France in the 1950s.
The anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss was the first intellectual who applied this
intellectual movement in his works. Ronald Barthes put forward this movement by
applying it in his works. However, its origin is in the works of Ferdinand de
Saussure in his development of the structural linguistics.
It was extending from linguistics to other disciplines as well and the concepts of
structuralism achieved widespread influence throughout the 1960s, 1970s and
1980s. Hence, it is also difficult to describe structuralism in a single definition or
proposition. However, it can be said that the essence of structuralism is the belief
that nothing can be understood in isolation and everything must be seen in the
context of the larger structure(s) it is a part of it. This looking for a bigger structure
of everything is called structuralism.
Structuralists believe that codes, signs, and rules govern all social and cultural
practices, including communication, the "language" of sports, friendships,
education, and literature. They wish to discover those codes that they believe give
meaning to all our social and cultural customs. The proper study of meaning and
therefore reality is an examination of the system behind these practices, not the
individual practices themselves.
For the structuralist, the proper study of literature becomes a study of the conditions
surrounding the act of interpretation itself, not an in-depth investigation of an
individual work. Structuralists believe that a study of the grammar, or the system of
rules that govern literary interpretation, becomes the critic's primary task.
Practiced by such critics as Jonathan Culler, Tzvetan Todorov, Roland Barthes, and
Gerard Genette, structuralism challenged New Criticism's methodology for finding
meaning within a text.
Ferdinand de Saussure's “ A Course in General Linguistics”
Ferdinand de Saussure's “ A Course in General Linguistics” (1916)is a summary of
his lectures at the University of Geneva from 1906-1911. In these lectures, Saussure
examines the relationship between speech and the evolution of language, and
investigates language as a structure system of signs.
He claims that linguistics is related to the history of language, and to the social or
cultural influences that shape the development of language. Linguistics also
includes the following studies:
Sign
The Object/Thing
Signifier Signified
The Physical existence The Mental Concept
(Sound, word, image) Fruit, apple, freshness, teacher,
Red, leaf, round, apple doctor, car, etc.
A Synchronic relationship is one where two similar things exist at the same
time. While the Diachronic is the change in the meaning of words over time.
Saussure criticized current linguistics as seeking to understand language changes
but not why it changed or what underlying factors where changing. He thus moved
the study of language from diachronic to synchronic relationships.
Deconstruction
The French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) is considered the father of
Deconstructionism. It is a critique of structuralism. Derrida accepts the ground of
Sausser’s linguistics just to dismantle it.
Deconstructionism (1969) is a method of critical analysis of philosophical and
literary language. Also, it is regarded a strategy of critical questioning directed
toward exposing:
1-Unquestiobable Metaphysical assumptions
2-Internal contradictions in philosophical language
3-Literary language
Differance
Derrida coins the term “Difference” which is constituted of “differ” and “defer”.
One signifier is always different from the other and it keeps postponing the other.
No sign is completed in itself.
Half of it is something else and that is never there.
There is always some lack, some incompleteness. So no entity is a unified whole.
Aporia
Aporia is: A deadlock of meaning. No conclusion. "state of the aporetic" and "a
perplexity or difficulty".
Thesis and Antithesis remain opposed to each other without any possibility of
Synthesis.
Deconstruction in General:
In short, Derrida Deconstructionism means: No text has absolute meaning.
There is always some possibility of some new interpretation.
A text is multilayered.
Language id entirely metaphorical.
He demolished distinction between literature and non-literature