366-Article Text-3721-1-10-20210728
366-Article Text-3721-1-10-20210728
366-Article Text-3721-1-10-20210728
org
IJCI
International Journal of
International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3)
Curriculum and Instruction
(2021) 2167–2177
Abstract
The role of inclusive research in understanding inclusive education has been globally emphasized in
literature. Promoting inclusive education in a newly established senior high school, students in this study
were actively involved as co-creators of knowledge with the aim of transforming pedagogies and classrooms.
This study employed grounded theory approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1998) in repeatedly examining the data
from the actual participation of 85 senior high school students who expressed their voices on the learning
experiences that they had in the first two months of school. Allowing students to become co-creator and co-
interpreter of information, the analysis presents richer knowledge on how learning environments such as
senior high school classrooms and grounds can be transformed into inclusive educational settings. Although
it was easy to collect data, the source which is in the form of documents could be incomplete and limited the
researchers in probing information that needed clarification. Inclusive research is crucial in understanding
epistemic diversity, which is a domain in the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). This
allows teachers and learners to further view education with greater consideration of their acquired
knowledge and where everyone in the learning process benefits.
© 2016 IJCI & the Authors. Published by International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction (IJCI). This is an open-
access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Inclusive research, grounded theory approach, senior high school, Philippines
1. Introduction
Schooling these days is becoming more exciting and liberating due to many efforts that
attempt to transform education. One factor influential to this transformation is the
technological revolution particularly of the world wide web; that is from Web 1.0 to Web
3.0 where users are not just recipient of information but also creators of knowledge.
Additionally, the global movement towards an equitable and quality education for all
compels educators to focus on constant inquiry and reflection which can effectively
facilitate the improvement of practice and enhance teaching and learning for all.
The trend for inquiry is currently leaning towards inclusive and participatory research.
Rather than using students and teachers as subjects of research, the emerging praxis of
research now includes them as co-producer of knowledge. They become actively involved
in transforming schools into a democratic learning environment where both
responsibility and glory are neither accounted to the teachers and school leaders nor the
students alone. Using the metaphor of the horse and the carriage, both entities should
have a collective understanding that one is not functioning well without the other.
The school where this study took place is a newly opened senior high school in a rural
community in the Philippines. Over 80% of the enrolled students moved in from the
adjacent national high school while the minority consists of learners from other
provinces, of students who completed an alternative program for out-of-school youth, and
of returning students whose ages are beyond their current grade level. Being a new
school, programs and activities, as well as funding and learning resources are not
completely set in place.
Miranda, et. al./ International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3) (2021) 2167-2177 2169
The researchers in this study were four teachers and the school head of the public
senior high school. Two of these teachers have just recently transferred from private
schools while one has just recently completed the units required for education and passed
the teachers’ board. The school head is a master teacher and has recently moved in from
a large public junior high school to the newly established senior high school which has a
total of 85 enrolments.
The context cited above is very significant to the nature of this research since findings
implicate on the establishment of the school, laying down the foundation for multiple
stakeholders. The expected audience of this research are not just internal stakeholders
but also the community, the educational leaders at different levels, and decision-makers
who operate in both bureaucratic and democratic environments.
2. Literature Review
The revolution of technology from analogue to digital systems has created massive
changes in the way people gain not just information but also skills that help them make a
meaningful living. To be more specific, the development of Web 2.0 technologies has
placed both the content and the user equally important (Magnuson, 2013), making
knowledge creation more decentralized. With teachers effectively using Information and
Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the classroom, we may address what Jimoyiannis
and colleagues (2013) once concluded that young people are more superior than teachers
in the use of ICT. Instead of feeling less skillful, teachers begin to harness technologies in
meaningful activities such as scaffolding and mentoring. Engaging activities are more
likely to occur by utilizing appropriate technologies in teaching and learning. The fit of
these tools supports the notion that the impact of using technology in the classroom is not
directly attributable to the technology per se but to how these technologies are being used
(Hew &and Cheung, 2013).
Schools have agency in providing students with meaningful experiences where their
individualities are thoughtfully considered. The role of schools in inclusion is very crucial
in creating environment where all students feel safe and experience equal opportunities.
As argued by Carrington and colleagues (2013), public schooling is ideally an avenue
where students are apprentice for democratic participation, and it prepares them to be
actively involved in the shaping and transforming of the society. This exists in schools
where student opinions matter; where teachers are not the only “experts” in the
classroom; and where everyone feels that they have something worthwhile to say (Kane
& Chimwayange, 2013). This level of inclusivity is what this paper believed to be more
socially-just and research-based in improving the praxis at MDSHS. Supplemented by
the top-down development activities, the bottom-up approach of understanding teaching
and learning is seen to be an effective way of honing teachers into quality educators.
Being informed of the pattern used by the literature in listening to student voices (e.g.
Kane & Chimwayange, 2013), this research draws on students’ written reflections on
their learning experiences inside and outside the classroom.
This inquiry is focused on how Grade 11 students voice out their learning experiences,
how their experiences are translated into best classroom practices, and how these
findings help in improving teaching and learning. In writing the research questions, we
decided to follow the basic principle of appreciative inquiry. This conceptual framework
was introduced by Cooperrider and Srivastva (1987) in their Appreciative Inquiry in
Organizational Life with research perspective pointing to social innovation rather than
problem-solving. Bringing fresh perspectives, appreciative inquiry suggests what might
Miranda, et. al./ International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3) (2021) 2167-2177 2171
work which provides a clearer vision of realistic opportunities for improving classroom
practices. Another essential element is the style of research that taps on the affective
dimension of an individual. Appreciative inquiry is based on affirmation which fosters
belief, trust and conviction; not on criticism which is based on negative feelings like
skepticism and doubt. This type of inquiry results to the development of theory based on
data represented by the collective will of an organization. As proposed by Serrat (2017),
“every organization has something that works right” (p.596). The essential step for the
organization is to find its life-giving forces that sustains the organization.
3. Methods
Greater interest for inclusive research has motivated the researchers to consider
qualitative approach in this study. As posited by Nind (2014), this method of research
gives participants a high regard for their voice as owners of valid perspectives about their
experiences. These experiences were examined using the grounded theory approach by
creatively and imaginatively theorizing out of the data. Suter (2014) emphasized the non-
routinized nature of qualitative approach because there are many ways to think about
this approach. With grounded theory, allowed our minds to wander on data and we made
free associations of information by comparing and questioning until we discover new
meaningful concepts (Thornberg, 2012a).
posts would be used for the teachers’ inquiry on best classroom practices. Lastly, as
Stoner (2015) clarified, a collection of posts from a site maybe considered a public
document – a less intrusive source of data - which this research has prepared by
conducting a course evaluation.
4. Results
This analysis highlights the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis.
In this subject, the most enjoyable thing for me is our group activities as we
can always collaborate during class recitations. I can also enhance my
English skills (Post#71).
Relative to this, the students enjoy much the use of online applications while performing
their individual assessment. Doing online review sessions through educational sites like
“Quizzizz” gave students a fun-filled learning with a motivation to do situational
analysis, and courage to take criticisms. Online quizzes provided challenge to most of
them, as they were required to do careful reading and analysis of every item on the test.
They could find satisfaction in doing such type of assessments as they were presented
with the reasons or justifications for every misconception about the lesson they once held
in mind.
I really enjoyed learning in oral comm, especially when we had online quizzes
on QUIZZIZZ. I love it as it shows how modern we are now. I enjoyed those
quizzes because aside from being interactive, fun or thrilling, it is also very
educational. I got to learn from my mistakes because the questions weren’t
identification. It makes us read more and understand and eventually, learn
(Post#67).
I learn a lot in this subject especially from our teacher. I like my teacher so
much because she always helps me understand the lesson (Post#88).
2174 Miranda, et. al./ International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3) (2021) 2167-2177
In this subject (Oral communication), I enjoy and like the most is when we had a
group activity whereby each group was asked to think of its own country, culture,
literature, traits, values, and language. It let us to communicate with different
nationalities and build good relationships with them. It also improved my English
skills (Post#265).
5. Discussion
This research advances three important implications for teacher and learning: listening
to students’ voices, teachers as researchers, and transforming teaching and learning.
This is part of youth development where senior high school students participate in
activities promoting healthy identities (Cammarota & Romero, 2011). The use of different
technologies is very engaging for many students because it taps into their skills in the
use of devices and various tools and platforms (Bell, 2010). As the students reported that
their ideas were always being considered, they were able to develop a positive regard for
Miranda, et. al./ International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3) (2021) 2167-2177 2175
their school performance. They are not just students who come to school regularly; but
they are the students who portrait their sense of responsibility.
6. Conclusions
References
Bahng, E., & Lee, M. (2017). Learning experiences and practices of elementary teacher candidates
on the use of emerging technology: A grounded theory approach. International Electronic
Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2), 225-241. doi:10.26822/iejee.2017236118
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing
House, 83, 39-43. doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415
Cammarota, J. & Romero, A. (2011). Participatory action research for high school students:
transforming policy, practice, and the personal with social justice education. Educational
Policy, 25(3), 488-506. doi: 10.1177/0895904810361722
Carrington, S., MacArthur, J., Kearney, A., Kimber, M., Mercer, L., Morton, L., & Rutherford, G.
(2013). Towards an inclusive education for all. In S. Carrington & J. MacArthur (Eds.),
Teaching in inclusive school communities. Queensland: John Wiley.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in
Organizational Change and Development, 1, 126-169. Retrieved from www.researchgate.,net.
Dimmock, C. (2016). Conceptualising the Research–Practice–Professional Development Nexus:
Mobilising Schools as “Research-engaged’ Professional Learning Communities. Professional
Development in Education, 42(1), 36-53. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.963884
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education:
The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47-64. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001
Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to
integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for pedagogy 2.0. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 248-267. doi: 10.14742/ajet.157
Kane, R., & Chimwayange, C. (2014). Teacher action research and student voice: Making sense of
learning in secondary school. Action Research, 12(1), 52-77. doi:10.1177/1476750313515282
Konza, D. M., & 77-86. (2012). Researching in schools: Ethical issues. International Journal of the
Humanities, 9(6), 77-86. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2012/2224.
Magnuson, M. L. (2013). Web 2.0 and information literacy instruction: Aligning technology with
ACRL standards. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 244-251. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.008
Nind, M. (2014). Inclusive research and inclusive education: Why connecting them makes sense
for teachers’ and learners’ democratic development of education. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 44(4), 525-540. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.936825
Philippine Department of Education [DepEd]. (2017). National Adoption and Implementation of
the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. (DO No.42, s. 2017). Philippines:
Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph.
Miranda, et. al./ International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13(3) (2021) 2167-2177 2177
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the Journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).